Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

EM SEIS DIAS - Por Que 50 Cientistas Decidiram Aceitar a Criação

http://www.scb.org.br/
Autor: John F. Ashton, Ph.D.
Páginas: 324 - coloridas

Este é um livro que, desde há cerca de 10 anos, estava sendo traduzido e editorado para ser impresso na primeira ocasião em que a SCB dispusesse de recursos suficientes para a sua publicação.

Seu autor é o Dr. John F. Ashton, criacionista australiano com quem os Editores mantiveram contato em congresso realizado na Austrália no ano 2000, e que gentilmente concedeu à SCB os direitos autorais para a publicação desse seu livro.

A tradução para o Português deste livro de autoria de John F. Ashton, originalmente publicado na Austrália em Inglês, foi efetuada pela Profa. Ieda C. Tetzke, e a revisão final procedida por uma equipe coordenada pela Sociedade Criacionista Brasileira, contando com a colaboração técnica dos Professores Mestres e Doutores Eduardo Ferreira Lütz, Nahor Neves de Souza Júnior, Queila de Souza Garcia, Tarcísio da Silva Vieira, Urias Echterhoff Takatohi e Wellington dos Santos Silva. A todas essas pessoas a SCB apresenta seus agradecimentos pela preciosa colaboração.

Foram inseridas nesta edição do livro várias ilustrações pertinentes, e sem dúvida ele será de leitura agradável e muito interessante por narrar a experiência pessoal de 50 cientistas que aceitaram a Criação da forma como ela é apresentada na Bíblia.

Por que alguns homens de ciência, muito bem preparados, ainda acreditam na Criação? Por que preferiram não acreditar na evolução darwinista ou mesmo na evolução teísta, na qual uma inteligência todo-poderosa é vista como direcionando os processos evolutivos? Poderiam cientistas
acreditar que a vida na Terra tem provavelmente menos de 10.000 anos de idade? Como eles lidariam com as evidências do registro fóssil e as eras sugeridas pela datação radiométrica de rochas que contariam milhões ou bilhões de anos?

Os ensaios apresentados nesse livro levantam questões que são debatidas acaloradamente entre
cientistas e educadores, e oferecem uma perspectiva diferente em nossa abordagem para a educação científica.

No livro, 50 cientistas explicam suas razões para a escolha dessa perspectiva criacionista. Todos
eles têm doutorado obtido em universidades públicas de prestígio na Austrália, EUA, Reino Unido, Canadá, África do Sul ou Alemanha. São professores universitários e pesquisadores, geólogos, zoólogos, biólogos, botânicos, físicos, químicos, matemáticos, pesquisadores biomédicos e engenheiros.

Pela primeira vez todas essas áreas estão sendo cobertas simultaneamente em uma só publicação
com os testemunhos pessoais de cientistas criacionistas.
Vale a pena ler !

Depois do Dilúvio

DEPOIS DO DILÚVIO http://www.scb.org.br/

Autor: Bill Cooper B. A. Hons.
Publicado em Português pela SCB
206 páginas
Formato: 14,7 x 20,7 cm
ISBN: 978-85-88611-13-9

O Autor concatena impressionantes evidências que indicam como os primeiros europeus registravam sua descendência desde Noé, na linhagem de Jafé, em documentos meticulosamente preservados; como conheciam tudo sobre a Criação e o Dilúvio; e como tiveram encontros com criaturas que hoje chamaríamos de dinossauros. Esses registros de diferentes nações imprimem aos capítulos 10 e 11 de Gênesis um grau de precisão que os destaca de todos os demais documentos históricos do mundo antigo. Em seu livro, fruto de mais de 25 anos de pesquisas, ele traça o desenvolvimento da controvérsia entre Criação e Evolução que grassou no mundo antigo, e detona muitos dos mitos e erros dos críticos bíblicos “modernistas”.

Bill Cooper é membro do Conselho e curador do Creation Science Movement, é casado e tem duas filhas. Recentemente recebeu o Honours Degree da Kingston University por seus estudos interdisciplinares em História das Idéias (Religião, Filosofia e Teoria Política) e Literatura Inglesa. Tem feito conferências sobre a “Tabela das Nações”, sob os auspícios do Creation Science Movement, na Alemanha e na Bélgica e em muitas ocasiões na Inglaterra, inclusive na Leeds University.

Ele tem escrito numerosos artigos para as revistas do Creation Science Movement e da Creation Science Foundation da Austrália, sobre a Tabela das Nações (Série sobre “A História Antiga do Homem”), sobre o Jonas histórico, e outros assuntos.

Este livro mostra como a História da Europa pode ser traçada desde o Dilúvio e os descendentes de Jafé, mediante relatos contemporâneos e a “Tabela das Nações”.

Palestinians to seek UN recognition next month

By Mohammed Daraghmeh, Associated Press, Oct. 28, 2012
RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP)—The Palestinian president is moving forward with his plan to seek upgraded observer status at the United Nations next month, despite American and Israeli threats of financial or diplomatic retaliation, officials said Sunday.

The decision sets the stage for a new showdown between Israel and the Palestinians at the world body, following last year’s attempt by the Palestinians to seek status as a full member state. Although that initiative failed to pass the U.N. Security Council, it caused months of diplomatic tensions with Israel.

“We will go to the U.N. regardless of any threats,” said Tawfik Tirawi, a senior member of President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah movement. “I expect the Israelis to take punitive measures against us, if we win this status, but this is our choice and we will not retract it.”

This year, the Palestinians are seeking “nonmember state” status in the U.N. General Assembly, where passage is assured. The 193-member assembly is dominated by developing nations sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. Officials say they are looking for what they call a “quality” majority that includes European countries as well, though Germany and Britain, for instance, have been cool to the Palestinian plan.

While upgraded status would not change the situation on the ground, the Palestinians say the move is still significant. They will ask for international recognition of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war.

They believe the U.N. vote would then require Israel to withdraw to the pre-1967 lines or face international legal action. Israel rejects a full return to those lines, and says the borders between Israel and a future Palestine must be reached through direct negotiations.

The Palestinians also hope to use upgraded status to join additional U.N. bodies, such as the International Criminal Court, where they could attempt to prosecute Israel on war crimes violations. The Palestinians last year received membership into UNESCO, the U.N. cultural agency. Over Israeli objections, they subsequently won recognition of the Church of the Nativity in the West Bank town of Bethlehem as an endangered heritage site.

The Palestinians last year decided to turn to the U.N. after years of deadlock in peace efforts with Israel. Negotiations have been frozen since late 2008, in large part over Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. The Palestinians say they will not resume talks without a settlement freeze.

Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said Israel has not yet decided how to respond, but he warned that U.N. recognition would “irreversibly poison the atmosphere” and make it impossible to resume peace talks.

“The Palestinians are openly declaring their intention to use this recognition as a weapon in an ever continuing diplomatic war they intend to wage against Israel,” he said. “If they are going to wage a legal and diplomatic war against Israel, what are the odds of returning to the negotiating table?”

Last year, Israel withheld millions of dollars in tax transfers to the Palestinians after their attempt to win full membership. That gambit was opposed by the United States, which threatened to use its veto power in the Security Council to block the bid.

The U.S. has not publicly said how it will respond this time, though Palestinian officials say Washington has also threatened to cut off vital financial aid to the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority.

Our Mysterious Past

By Bruce Malone: 

Just beneath the lush vegetation and majestic scenery of our planet is a massive worldwide graveyard. Plants and animals are buried by the billions under countless tons of mud and sediment which have subsequently turned to rock. How did all those organisms get there? The answer to that question is THE KEY to understanding our origin.

Starting in the early 1800’s geologists have chosen to interpret fossils and sediments based on a presupposition of slow accumulation, or more recently, multiple local catastrophes over billions of years (uniformitarianism). Thousands of geologists have been indoctrinated in this belief and have spent the last 150 years working to fit the evidence into this interpretation of earth history. Yet, many facts remain unexplained by this interpretation. Most of these “mysteries” disappear, if the reality of a recent worldwide flood is acknowledged. A jury looking for the truth starts with eye witness accounts. In addition to the Bible, which clearly presents the global flood as a factual event, every major culture in the world has a flood story. From the Aztecs to the Chinese...Aborigines to the ancient Greeks...all cultures have an ancient account of a universal flood. Many of these stories include details of a righteous man being saved on a floating vessel and attribute the event to judgment from God. If this really happened; people would have spread across the globe after the catastrophe. As centuries passed, the account of the flood would have become distorted. This is exactly what we find.

More evidence comes from fossils. The very existence of fossils is evidence of rapid burial. Fossils do not form today unless animals are rapidly buried. Yet many fossil deposits contain billions of tightly packed and intricately preserved creatures indicating that they had been washed together and rapidly buried. The extent, frequency, and lack of decay found in most fossil beds testify to the worldwide extent of the catastrophe.

The nature of the rock record is also a testimony to a worldwide flood. At many locations around the world, often resting just above those rock layers containing very few indications of life, there is a conglomeration of rocks and boulders. The Great Unconformity in the Grand Canyon is an example of this. The Great Unconformity represents a supposed 500 million years of missing earth history. But is there really any “missing” time? Along this interface great boulders of Shinumo Quartite are buried exactly as if they were transported into place by energetic flood waters.[1] The expected consequence of an extensive and energetic flood would be the rapid erosion of massive amounts of sediment and the redeposit of these sediments at other locations. Rocks and boulders would drop to the bottom of these flood waters and come to rest at the top of newly scoured surfaces. This is what we find between the Tapeats sandstone/Dox sandstone border in the Grand Canyon. Evolutionists assume there is a “missing” 500 million years at this border. Creationists see the evidence as a conformation of a worldwide flood with no “missing” time.

Creation geologists have only been working to explain the massive sedimentary rock layers of our planet by a worldwide flood for a few decades and there is still much to be explained. However, the creation model explains many problems which the uniformitarian model does not - despite 150 years of study from an evolutionary perspective.

The truth can only be found if all of the evidence is examined. Does our current scientific and education establishment allow for this freedom of investigation?

Footnote:

1. Austin, Steve, Grand Canyon Monument to Catastrophe - Field Study Guide Tour book, pp.44,
ICR, 1993.

Reaching “Pleasant Places”

By Amanda White

I love Psalm 23. Perhaps it’s because I especially love the verses about being in calm, beautiful, and peaceful situations. “He maketh me to lie down in green pastures; He leadeth me beside the still waters. He restoreth my soul: He leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.”1

I was meditating on this Psalm and realized that it’s somewhat of a snapshot of life. In that short chapter, just six verses, you get a brief picture of the cycles of life—the highs and lows, the good times and bad, the peaceful and chaotic. Yet through it all, one thing remains: God’s presence. The enduring and unchanging truth: “The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.”2

I’m a creature of comfort and routine. I like the times in my life when I’m resting in the green pastures and drinking from the beautiful still waters—those periods of time when everything is going well, when I’m seeing and feeling the blessings, when everything is chugging along pretty seamlessly.

I naturally feel the Lord’s presence more during times of peace and plenty. There’s not as much need; I feel more confident that He’s there and with me. Perhaps that’s why the psalmist didn’t need to remind himself that the Lord was with him in verse 2. We don’t often need to be reminded of God being with us during such times, because we already feel it—we’re in the green pastures and beside the still waters.

Sometimes, though, when things go haywire or not according to plan—the “dark valley” parts of life—I start to feel less like He’s with me, it’s easier to feel distant, and I have to keep reminding myself that He is there. Perhaps that’s why King David reminded himself of the Lord’s presence in verse 4, because he also had to boost his faith in times of difficulty: “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for Thou art with me; Thy rod and Thy staff they comfort me.”3

The Lord is with us, He is comforting us, even if we can’t sense His presence as strongly when we’re in the dark valley parts of life. He’s there, even if the dark valley portion of our journey is a little bit longer (or maybe even a lot longer) than we had hoped.

I’m going through a dark valley time right now. And, unfortunately, I’m impatient. I want the challenge over and done with. I want the Lord to supply what I need right away. I want to move from the “dark valley” part to the “green pasture” part as quickly as possible. And then I have to admit that when I get to the “green pasture” months, I will want that portion of my life to last as long as possible before I’m interrupted by another time in a new “dark valley.”

I read a quote this morning that clearly expressed my natural inclination, and yet reminded me that God’s perspective and plan is so much bigger and better than mine. So often I want Him to be “done already!!!!” And yet it’s just going to take that little bit longer for Him to set everything in place as He has planned.

“God relishes surprise. We want lives of simple, predictable ease—smooth, even trails as far as the eye can see—but God likes to go off-road. He places us in predicaments that seem to defy our endurance and comprehension—and yet don’t. By His love and grace, we persevere. The challenges that make our stomachs churn invariably strengthen our faith and grant measures of wisdom and joy we would not experience otherwise.”4

I’d like the stomach churning to end, but I also like the thought that God is loving this ride, that He’s somehow going to work things out for my good. And in the meantime, I hope that I will gain all that He has for me to experience before this off-road journey ends and I reach the green pastures again. I’m sure I will reach the green pastures at some point; we always do. I just need to be patient and wait for His timing.

This was His promise to my heart: “You can trust that I will lead and guide you into pleasant places. Those ‘pleasant places’ won’t be clear right away. There will be a period of time that will be pretty tough, that will be challenging, that will even be dark and bleak at times. But as you continue following Me, the ‘pleasant places’ will come, you will see.”

Another personal favorite promise that I love to claim during times of uncertainty or change is the verse “Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have entered into the heart of man the things which God has prepared for those who love Him.”5 I know that verse is talking about what the Lord has prepared for us in heaven, but I like to also claim it for the things that I’m sure He has prepared for me here on earth as well. Since I love Him and He loves me, I know that He has good things lined up ahead.

Here are a few more of the promises that I remind myself of when I’m in a time of uncertainty or change, or am waiting for the Lord to supply a need:



The thoughts and intents of your heart are ever before Me. I have always been with you, caring for you and leading you in the way that you should go. My love for you is the same today as it was yesterday, and as it will be forever—and it will never change. It is the constant, unchangeable, and unmovable factor—the God factor—that you can depend on, both now and in the days to come.6

*

I will keep, support, and protect you, regardless of the circumstances or the conditions in which you may find yourselves, just as I have done throughout history.7

*

I will do whatever is needed, and use whatever means are available to care for you, and you will not be left comfortless or uncared-for.8

*

I am the one responsible to care for you and provide for you and see you through any circumstances you face. Everything else can come and go—but nothing changes or impacts My ability to care for you, or My knowledge of your needs as an individual. What you give, I give back to you. What you trust Me for, I provide in one way or another.9

*

Place your confidence and trust where it belongs—firmly in Me and in My leading in your life, in My strength for what I ask of you, in My supply when I’m directing you to take on a certain venture. I’m committed to you, and that’s the bottom line. You can bank on it.10

*

Place your faith and trust in Me, and know that as you have given to Me, I will give to you. As you have served Me, I will serve you. I might not do it in the ways you’ve anticipated, hoped for, or planned for, but I will not fail. I am a man of My word.11

*

Everything else can come and go and change, but My care for you, My promises to you, will outlast it all. My nature and My goodness and My care are not limited to a time or circumstance. They transcend all.12

*

For as the days of a tree, so will be the days of My people; My chosen ones will long enjoy the works of their hands.13

*

Those who seek the Lord shall not lack.14

*

My times are in Your hand.15

*

The righteous shall flourish like a palm tree, He shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon. Those who are planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God. He is my rock, and there is no unrighteousness in Him.16


1 Psalm 23:2–3.

2 Psalm 23:1.

3 Psalm 23:4.

4 Tony Snow, “Cancer's Unexpected Blessings,” Christianity Today, July 20, 2007.

5 1 Corinthians 2:9 NKJV.

6 Originally published March 2010.

7 Originally published March 2010.

8 Originally published March 2010.

9 Originally published March 2010.

10 Originally published March 2010; adapted.

11 Originally published March 2010.

12 Originally published March 2010.

13 Isaiah 65:22 NIV.

14 Psalm 34:10 NKJV.

15 Psalm 31:15 NKJV.

16 Psalm 92:12–13, 15 NKJV.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Spiritual Explorers with Adventurous Hearts


A compilation

Download Audio (9.2MB)

I’ve just recently read “Mud, Sweat and Tears,” an autobiography by adventurer Bear Grylls. In case you’re not familiar with Grylls, he’s the star of TV’s “Man vs. Wild.” During each show, Grylls is dropped in some of the toughest terrains on earth and then has to find his way back to civilization. Highlights so far have included him sleeping inside the hollowed-out carcass of a dead camel, paddling a tiny self-made raft through shark-infested seas, and wrestling a wild boar to the ground.

But the book’s account of his life story is even more intense than the TV show. We read of his grueling SAS training (the daring special forces unit for the UK army) and breaking his back parachuting during a mission. Remarkably, after his recovery from this devastating event, he set his mind on a new goal and successfully became the youngest Briton to climb Mount Everest. Incidentally, there are some nice insights into his faith in Christ running throughout the book, too.

I might actually be the complete opposite of Bear Grylls. Any thought I ever had of parachuting, building a raft, or climbing a mountain has been quickly tidied away into my brain’s “unnecessary risks” file. As I read this book there honestly wasn’t even a tiny part of me that wanted to get involved with these same kinds of pursuits. To put it bluntly, when it comes down to sheer personality and my outlook toward life, I’m no adventurer.

But here’s the thing: When it comes to a life of following Jesus Christ, spiritually speaking, we must all become adventurers. The Holy Spirit of God may not send you to climb Everest, but he is indeed a sending Spirit, and, one way or another, he will lead you into a life of adventure. The Kingdom existence is not lived at a standstill or walked on smooth and level paths. It is a journey of excitement, exploration, faith, risk, and trust. Our personality types may not be of the bungee-jumping, free-falling variety, and a life of physical adventure and risk-taking is not for everyone. But when it comes to our service in the Kingdom of God and our life in the Spirit, we must all become adventurers. As we follow his heart and his voice in this world, we will be led to climb higher, dive deeper, and venture further into his plans and purposes.

When I look back over the last decade of my life, I’m encouraged to see a little something of this dynamic at work. My wife and I have moved house and location several times over these last 10 years to help plant new churches. The last chapter included two years in Atlanta for the beginnings of Passion City Church. Now we’re back in the UK at St. Peter’s Brighton, a new congregation planted in the most un-churched city in the UK. It’s not been a simple ride; moving is complicated—especially internationally and especially when you have five children!

No, it’s not always been easy. But it has also never been boring. Worshipping the God of all comfort does not mean we will live a comfortable life. But you can beteverything you have that it will be a fulfilled one.

The reason I share these details is simple: This life of moving around and jumping into these new church start-ups is so very far away from where my natural personality and temperament would have led me. I probably would have been content to sit at home and settle in just one location for this past decade. But something else has come into play—a factor which far outweighs my personality type or our location preferences. It is the Holy Spirit of God, stirring us up and sending us out. For our family it has meant several geographical relocations. For you it might mean obediently never moving away from the town you were born in, but living passionately, boldly, and daringly in one place. Whatever the case, it will be a life of surprises and never one of stagnation or tedium.

We must all become spiritual explorers and adventurous hearts inspired and empowered by Jesus and ready to follow wherever he leads.—Matt Redman1

*

Growth demands a temporary surrender of security. It may mean a giving up of familiar but limiting patterns, safe but unrewarding work … “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.”2 The real fear should be of the opposite course.—Gail Sheehy

*

In actual life every great enterprise begins with and takes its first forward step in faith.—Friedrich von Schlegel

*

When my daughter Julie invited me to go kayaking with her around the Channel Islands harbor, I thought it would be a leisurely afternoon. As soon as I crawled off of the dock into the kayak for the first time, however, I realized I might have been a bit optimistic. Bobbing on top of the water, the little craft felt horribly unstable.

The slightest shift of weight caused it to start rolling, threatening to dump me into the cold waters of the harbor. When I adjusted my weight to compensate, I overcorrected and the boat would begin to roll in the opposite direction. As I shifted and reshifted multiple times in a few seconds, my kayak quivered like a bowl of Jello in a California earthquake.

I honestly wondered if this had been such a good idea. If I was having so much trouble in the calm waters by the dock, how would I ever fare in the chop of the open water? Julie was already rowing around the dock. I only had a few seconds to choose whether or not to let go and sort it out in the going or stay holding on to the dock, looking like a wimp and missing out on the last special father-daughter day I would have with Julie before she got married.

Uncertain though I was about my ability to stay dry, I pushed away from the dock and learned how to stabilize the kayak and guide it into the open water. It took a while. Every move in the boat felt awkward until I got used to it. Even reaching for the paddle sent my kayak quivering again. I never regretted it, though. Eventually I learned how to row the kayak and we had a joyful afternoon cruising the harbor together—racing, splashing, laughing and enjoying the sights and the conversation.

I’ve thought about that day many times since because it mirrored so much of my life over the last decade. For so long I’ve sought a relationship with Jesus that fulfilled the promise and example of Scripture. Though I’d had tastes of it from time to time, the reality always seemed to fade away just as I got closer. I didn’t realize it at the time, but looking back, I know I was holding on to the dock. Afraid to follow his invitation to the open water, I clung to that which gave me temporary stability and security.

I had no idea that serving my desire for security and trying to follow Jesus were at odds with each other. No wonder my faith seemed so temporary and fruitless. Life in him can’t be lived holding on to the dock because of our insecurities. At some point we have to push away, and only then can we learn how to live this incredible life in Jesus.—Wayne Jacobsen

*

O’er uncharted sea
To their hearts’ desire
Do men of faith set sail,
While the beaten men
Walk with fearful hearts
Along life’s beaten trail.

The men of faith will challenge
Both men and Satan’s wrath,
But the beaten men will compromise
And walk the beaten path.

Beaten roads are for beaten men,
As they walk with measured tread;
With tuneless souls they move along
To dwell among the dead.

But men of faith climb unscaled walls,
And sail uncharted sea.
They dare to cross convention’s bounds
To set the captives free.
—Thomas Wyatt

*

The rugged climb doesn't dissuade the determined mountain climber; he revels in the challenge. Nothing can stop him from pressing on until he reaches his goal. No adversity can cause him to turn back. When he looks at the steep cliffs ahead, he doesn't focus on the danger but on the toeholds and narrow rock ledges that will take him to the peak. He isn't held back by the harshness of his surroundings or the toll the climb is taking on his body; he is propelled onward and upward by the thought of triumph.

There are many obstacles to surmount in life, but each one you conquer is another one behind you. When the going gets tough, lean on Me. Let Me lead the way and guide you up the rugged cliffs. I know all the danger spots and how to get past them. Together we will surmount each obstacle, together we will reach the summit, and together we will plant the flag of victory!—Jesus, speaking in prophecy3

Published on Anchor October 2012. Read by Bethany Kelly.
Music by Daniel Sozzi.


1 http://pastors.com/we-must-become-spiritual-explorers-with-adventurous-hearts/

2 Dostoevsky.

Monday, October 29, 2012

One Hundred Percent

A compilation

Download Audio (12.2MB)

I’ve told the story of my grandfather before in different venues. Papa, as we called him, was one of the greatest men of God I’ve ever known. But he also experienced one of the greatest hardships I’ve ever seen. Papa watched his wife of over 50 years slowly lose her mind and body to Alzheimer’s. By the end, she started to literally scream curses and obscenities at him. But he handled it with more grace and faith than you can imagine. Regardless of grandmother’s condition, he would go every day to the nursing home and comb her hair and tell her she was beautiful until they would kick him out.

Papa died about eighteen months before Grandma passed away. The final scenes of their marriage were pitiful, really, from a purely earthly perspective. Healing never came. And it broke Papa’s heart. But still, surprisingly, every time you would ask Papa how he was doing, he’d always say the same thing: 100%.

As a kid, it always bothered me that he said that because I felt like it couldn’t be true. His health was getting worse. His wife’s health was getting much worse. And everything he loved in his life and worked to build in his life was going away.

It wasn’t until years later after he passed away that I finally understood why he could say it. I was reflecting and praying about it, about how he could say he was 100% at the worst time in his life. It still sounded like a lie. He wasn’t 100%. He wasn’t even 50%. He wasn’t even 10%.

But then I felt like the Lord spoke back to me a sentence that completely flipped my perspective: It depends on what you’re measuring.

If you’re measuring his circumstances, he’s not 100%. But if you’re measuring his confidence in Christ… If you’re measuring his hope in a future home in heaven and that one day all things will be made new… If you’re measuring the faithfulness of God toward him despite his circumstances, then he was 100% all of the time.

If you were to measure how any of us feel in any given moment, none of us could ever say 100%. Your status is going to change with the shifting sands of your circumstances. You’re going to have bad days. The carpet of your life is going to be ripped out from underneath you a few times in your life. And in those moments, the temptation is going to be to equate your condition with your circumstances.

Don’t.

I don’t know you. I don’t know the circumstances you’re facing. The pain you’re enduring. What I do know is that most of you would say you’re not 100%. In fact, you may think you’re in the single digits. But regardless of what you’re going through, I’d still say the same thing to you [that] God said to me: It depends on what you’re measuring.

Although it’s difficult, choose to see things with a new perspective. You’re 100%. Not because of your circumstances. But because of the fact that regardless of your circumstances, Christ is 100% with you and for you. 100% of the time.—Steven Furtick

*

Praise the Lord, O my soul.—Psalm 146:1

*

God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. Selah.—Psalm 46:1–3

*

Bless the Lord, O my soul: and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits: who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy diseases; who redeemeth thy life from destruction; who crowneth thee with lovingkindness and tender mercies; who satisfieth thy mouth with good things; so that thy youth is renewed like the eagle's. The Lord executeth righteousness and judgment for all that are oppressed.—Psalm 103:1–6

*

Rejoice in the Lord always: and again I say, Rejoice. Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand. Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God. And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.—Philippians 4:4–7

*

Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.—John 14:27

*

When peace, like a river, attendeth my way,
When sorrows like sea billows roll;
Whatever my lot, Thou has taught me to say,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.

Though Satan should buffet, though trials should come,
Let this blest assurance control,
That Christ has regarded my helpless estate,
And hath shed His own blood for my soul.

My sin, oh, the bliss of this glorious thought!
My sin, not in part but the whole,
Is nailed to the cross, and I bear it no more,
Praise the Lord, praise the Lord, O my soul!

For me, be it Christ, be it Christ hence to live:
If Jordan above me shall roll,
No pang shall be mine, for in death as in life,
Thou wilt whisper Thy peace to my soul.

But Lord, ’tis for Thee, for Thy coming we wait,
The sky, not the grave, is our goal;
Oh, trump of the angel! Oh, voice of the Lord!
Blessed hope, blessed rest of my soul.

And Lord, haste the day when my faith shall be sight,
The clouds be rolled back as a scroll;
The trump shall resound, and the Lord shall descend,
Even so, it is well with my soul.

It is well, it is well
It is well with my soul.—Horatio Gates Spafford

This hymn was written by a Chicago lawyer, Horatio G. Spafford. You might think to write a worship song titled, “It is well with my soul,” you would indeed have to be a rich, successful Chicago lawyer. On the contrary, [these words were penned by] a man who had suffered almost unimaginable personal tragedy.

Horatio G. Spafford and his wife, Anna, were pretty well known in 1860s Chicago. And this was not just because of Horatio’s legal career and business endeavors. The Spaffords were also prominent supporters and close friends of D. L. Moody, the famous preacher. In 1870, however, things started to go wrong. The Spaffords’ only son was killed by scarlet fever at the age of four. A year later, it was fire rather than fever that struck. Horatio had invested heavily in real estate on the shores of Lake Michigan. In 1871, every one of these holdings was wiped out by the great Chicago Fire.

Aware of the toll that these disasters had taken on the family, Horatio decided to take his wife and four daughters on a holiday to England. And, not only did they need the rest—D. L. Moody needed the help. He was traveling around Britain on one of his great evangelistic campaigns. Horatio and Anna planned to join Moody in late 1873. And so, the Spaffords traveled to New York in November, from where they were to catch the French steamer Ville de Havre across the Atlantic. Yet just before they set sail, a last-minute business development forced Horatio to delay. Not wanting to ruin the family holiday, Spafford persuaded his family to go as planned. He would follow on later. With this decided, Anna and her four daughters sailed to Europe while Spafford returned to Chicago. Just nine days later, Spafford received a telegram from his wife in Wales. It read: “Saved alone.”

On November 2, 1873, the Ville de Havre had collided with The Lochearn, an English vessel. It sank in only 12 minutes, claiming the lives of 226 people. Anna Spafford had stood bravely on the deck, with her daughters Annie, Maggie, Bessie and Tanetta clinging desperately to her. Her last memory had been of her baby being torn violently from her arms by the force of the waters. Anna was only saved from the fate of her daughters by a plank which floated beneath her unconscious body and propped her up. When the survivors of the wreck had been rescued, Mrs. Spafford’s first reaction was one of complete despair. Then she heard a voice speak to her, “You were spared for a purpose.” And she immediately recalled the words of a friend, “It’s easy to be grateful and good when you have so much, but take care that you are not a fair-weather friend to God.”

Upon hearing the terrible news, Horatio Spafford boarded the next ship out of New York to join his bereaved wife. Bertha Spafford (the fifth daughter of Horatio and Anna, born later) explained that during her father’s voyage, the captain of the ship had called him to the bridge. “A careful reckoning has been made,” he said, “and I believe we are now passing the place where the de Havre was wrecked. The water is three miles deep.” Horatio then returned to his cabin and penned the lyrics of his great hymn.

The words which Spafford wrote that day come from 2 Kings 4:26. They echo the response of the Shunammite woman to the sudden death of her only child. Though we are told “her soul is vexed within her,” she still maintains that “It is well.” And Spafford’s song reveals a man whose trust in the Lord is as unwavering as hers was.

It would be very difficult for any of us to predict how we would react under circumstances similar to those experienced by the Spaffords. But we do know that the God who sustained them would also be with us.

No matter what circumstances overtake us, may we be able to say with Horatio Spafford...

When peace like a river, attendeth my way,
When sorrows like sea billows roll;
Whatever my lot, Thou hast taught me to say,
It is well, it is well with my soul.

Though Satan should buffet, though trials should come,
Let this blest assurance control,
That Christ hath regarded my helpless estate,
And hath shed His own blood for my soul!

It is well ... with my soul!
It is well, it is well, with my soul.1

Published on Anchor October 2012. Read by Simon Gregg.


1 From www.biblestudycharts.com.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

In Israel, Carter Derides Netanyahu and Obama


By Jodi Rudoren, NY Times, October 22, 2012
JERUSALEM—Three decades after leaving the White House, former President Jimmy Carter still functions inside the trappings of power, cruising through fiercely contested areas of this city on Monday in a 12-car motorcade, with Secret Service agents stationed strategically as he surveyed the view from the Mount of Olives.

But at 88, Mr. Carter, trying to nudge his agenda without an official platform, no longer filters his words for politics or diplomacy. On Monday, he ramped up his years of criticism of Israeli policy by saying that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lacked the courage of his predecessors and that he had abandoned the two-state solution that has been the accepted framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades. And just two weeks before the American election, he was almost as critical of President Obama, saying his administration has shirked the historical role played by the United States in the region.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that Netanyahu has decided the one-state option is the one he’s going to pursue,” Mr. Carter said.

As for Mr. Obama, a fellow Democrat, the former president said, “The U.S. government policy the last two to three years has basically been a rapid withdrawal from any kind of controversy.”

He added: “Every president has been a very powerful factor here in advocating this two-state solution. That is now not apparent.”

Mr. Carter was here with the former prime minister of Norway, Gro Harlem Brundtland, and the former president of Ireland, Mary Robinson, on behalf of the Elders, a group of 10 left-leaning éminences grises convened by Nelson Mandela in 2007 that aims to promote human rights and world peace by, according to its Web site, “speaking difficult truths and tackling taboos.” Mr. Carter and Ms. Brundtland met with President Shimon Peres of Israel on Sunday, and all three met with President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority on Monday, consulting in between with like-minded Palestinian and Israeli intellectuals. On Wednesday, they are scheduled to see Egypt’s new Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi.

A born-again Christian who served a single term as president from 1977 to 1981, Mr. Carter said he has been to Israel and the Palestinian territories about 30 times. He recalled swimming in the Dead Sea on his first visit, in 1973, and noted that there were then about 1,500 Jewish settlers in the West Bank, compared with the 350,000 living there now. And he has long been an outspoken critic of Israeli policy, particularly in his 2006 book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.”

But Mr. Carter said Monday that the situation is “worse now than it’s ever been for the Palestinians” because of the expanding settlements and lack of prospects for change. Describing himself as “grieved, disgusted and angry,” he said the two-state solution is “in death throes,” which he called “a tragic new development that the world is kind of ignoring.”

Surveys show Palestinians and Israelis overwhelmingly support a two-state solution, but intellectuals on both sides have increasingly been talking about a binational, single state. But models for such a state generally either imagine Israel losing its Jewish character, or ruling over a Palestinian majority in an undemocratic way. Mr. Carter called the one-state option “a catastrophe—not for the Palestinians, for Israel.”

“I’ve known every prime minister since Golda Meir,” Mr. Carter said, ticking off experiences with Menachem Begin, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak. “All the previous prime ministers have been so courageous in their own way. In the past, all committed to the two states.

“It looks to me like a decision has been made,” he added, “to go to the one-state solution but to conceal it from the world.”

Fossils Do Not Prove Evolution!

By Bruce Malone

Fossils. The very name brings to mind images of untold ages past...dinosaurs roaming ancient swamps...slow but steady progression as simple sea life was transformed into today’s complex variety. Is this an accurate reconstruction of the past or is a worldwide flood the correct explanation of the fossil record?

Fossils are the preserved evidence of past life. They are found in every part of the world, including the tops of the highest mountains. They may be as simple as a seashell which has left a permanent impression in sandstone or as grandiose as a giant plesiosaur whose bones have turned to rock after rapid burial. The fossils themselves tell us neither their age nor how they became encased in the rock layers. Rather, they must be interpreted within some view of earth history. Many people have been led to believe that the existence of fossils proves that millions of years have passed. In reality, fossils can form quite rapidly. Heat and pressure from rapid burial can accelerate the fossilization process. Geological conditions following a worldwide flood would have exceeded anything imaginable today and thus led to the rapid fossilization of the plants and animals on a massive scale.

Fossilization can happen rapidly under the right conditions, although it is a rare event today. Yet, there are mass burial sites throughout the world that are tightly packed with millions of fossils. Apparently, billions of organisms were washed together by the mass destruction of the worldwide flood, buried by massive amounts of sediment, and rapidly fossilized. These extensive fossil graveyards would be the predictable result of a worldwide flood, but would hardly fit the slow accumulation model which continues to be taught as the primary explanation of the fossil record. Something dramatically different must have happened in the past to have caused the wide spread fossilization which we find all over our planet. Noah’s flood would have been this event.

Geologists and paleontologists operating from a Christian world view acknowledge the possibility that a worldwide catastrophe buried unimaginable amounts of plants and animals. This was the disaster documented in the first book of the Bible. It lasted over a year and had reverberations lasting for centuries.

Although any order of burial in a flood would be possible, the general tendency would be for sea life to be buried in the lower rock layers and land animals to be buried in higher rock layers corresponding to their ecological niche. This tendency is generally found. Sea creatures would have been buried first because the salinity and temperature of the oceans would have changed during the catastrophe, wiping out massive numbers of these sea creatures. Ninety-five percent of all fossils found are sea creatures. Even after the flood, plant and animal extinction would have been common as many types of creatures failed to adapt to the dramatically changing conditions.

Creation geologists (and there are many of them) believe that the majority of the geological record is a result of geological activity during and subsequent to the year-long, worldwide flood. This flood would have been an incredibly complex event. It must have involved rapidly moving continental plates, changing climatic conditions, and massive volcanism for decades.

Geologists and paleontologists operating from an evolutionary world view acknowledge local catastrophes, but do not allow consideration of a worldwide flood. This would wipe out the “slow change over eons of time” interpretation of the fossils which is needed to continue believing in evolution.

Only one interpretation of the evidence can be correct and only one interpretation of the evidence agrees with what the Bible claims is the history of our planet.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Anxious Turks suspect US plot is behind Syria's implosion


By Emiko Jozuka, CS Monitor, October 20, 2012
Antakya, Turkey—In an empty coffee house in Antakya, local tradesman Ahmet Sari’s face crumples in anger as he speaks about Syria.

“What’s happening in Syria is all part of America’s great project to reshape the borders of the Middle East. America and its allies don’t care about bringing democracy to the Syrian people. Look at what happened to Iraq!” he fumes. “The imperialist countries are only after oil and mineral resources.”

Nineteen months into Syria’s conflict, resentment of Ankara and anti-US sentiment simmer in Antakya, which lies just over the border with Syria. The province is grappling with an ailing trade and tourism sector and an influx of refugees and rebel fighters. Locals blame the Turkish government for dragging them into the conflict by backing the Syrian opposition and aligning Turkey with the opposition’s Western allies.

The current administration’s “zero problems with neighbors” foreign policy, which stood strong for several years, now rings hollow as Turkey’s diplomatic ties with Syria and its ally Iran sour due to Ankara’s support for the rebels. And many say that all of these problems can be traced back to the US, who they are convinced got involved with, and perhaps even fomented, the Syrian unrest to loosen up regional powers’ grip on oil, enlisting Turkey as a pawn in the process. It had little to do with support for democracy, they believe.

The beliefs stem in part from a bold Bush administration political proposal that has faded into obscurity in the West, but remains lodged in the minds of many here. Known as the Greater Middle East Initiative, it was formally introduced by then-US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in 2006 at a conference in Tel Aviv. Her references to “the birth pangs of a New Middle East” and the unveiling there of a new map of the region featuring a “Free Kurdistan” are still remembered with resentment.

Even with a new administration in the White House that has sought to distance itself from the previous administration’s Middle East policies, many in the region are suspicious of US motives and don’t believe that the various uprisings began as indigenous, people-driven movements, independent of any US involvement.

Refik Eryilmaz, a Turkish parliamentarian from Antakya with the opposition Republican People’s Party, says that Western superpowers are trying to incite a sectarian conflict between Sunnis and Shiites so that countries in the region fragment along ethno-religious lines, becoming weaker in the process.

Syria is predominantly Sunni, but President Bashar al-Assad is an Alawite, a Shiite offshoot, as is most of his government.

“The access to oil will be made easier when people in these regions are divided and fighting amongst themselves. Both the US and Israel want to weaken Iran and strengthen their own position in the Middle East. But to do this, first they must weaken Syria and replace the current government with someone who supports them instead of Iran,” says Mr. Eryilmaz.

This suspicion—that outside intervention is stirring up sectarian strife in Syria—is a view shared by many in Antakya, Turkey’s most ethno-religiously diverse province.

Although Nihat Yenmis, president of the Alevi Cultural Foundation (AKAD) in Iskenderun, is convinced that sectarian violence will not seep into Turkey, he laments the plight of Syrian civilians, caught up in the cross-fire of a conflict that he interprets as planned and stoked by outside intervention.

“All ethno-religious groups have lived side by side in this region for centuries. But if someone hits a beehive from the outside, they will destroy the peace within the hive. All the bees inside the hive will fight with one another. That’s exactly what the US is doing in the Middle East,” says Mr. Yenmis.

The region’s penchant for Western conspiracy theories is long-standing, beginning with the then-secret 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement that divided up the region between the British and the French, scholars say.

That history influenced the perception of the Bush administration’s Greater Middle East Partnership Initiative, later renamed the New Middle East Project, that was drawn up in 2004 in response to potential “threats of terrorism” in the wake of 9/11. The mission was to bolster democracy and socio-economic development in the Middle East and North Africa and build a bulwark against the expansion of radical terrorist groups, such as Al Qaeda.

But the initiative stalled in the face of heightened anti-American sentiment in the wake of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Prominent Arab figures were quick to criticize it as another US attempt to “reform” a region it did not fully understand. In an article published in pan-Arab newspaper Al-Hayat in 2004, the chief editor of the Arab Human Development Report, Nader Fergany, criticized the “arrogant” worldview of the Bush administration which “causes it to behave as if it can decide the fate of states and peoples.”

Back in Antakya’s coffee house, with no end in sight to the Syrian conflict, local trader Ahmet Sari shows how deeply this sentiment reaches.

“So many people have died unnecessarily in Syria—children are dying,” he says, wearily. “We just want this war to stop and for there to be peace. We don’t hate the American people. We just want the US administration to stop trying to spread its expansionist policies.”

A Blast from the Past: Evolutionists seek to “place a chimpanzee in the manger, a gorilla on the cross, and a monkey in Joseph’s tomb.”

Georgia Purdom

A few weeks ago, my Dad was sorting through some old papers that had belonged to his parents and came across a booklet titled, “Evolution or the Bible—Which?” by Rev. Dewey Whitwell (the subtitle above is a quote from it). Of course, He knew I would be very interested in it! The booklet appears to have been published sometime between 1933 and 1955. We know this because Dr. Judson Rudd, president of William Jennings Bryan University (now Bryan College), wrote the foreword to the booklet and served as president during those years.

Rev./Dr. Dewey Whitwell was from Nashville, Tennessee, and was an evangelist in the Evangelical United Brethren denomination. The publisher of the book stated that Rev. Whitwell attended the Scopes case that was presented before the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1926. Other than that, I wasn’t able to find much information on Rev. Whitwell, but I did greatly appreciate what he wrote in this booklet over 50 years ago.

In the introduction to the booklet, Rev. Whitwell stated the following:

I wish to call your attention to a pertinent text for this discussion. The text is found in Gen. 1:1, “In the beginning God.” These first four words of the Bible are the key-note [sic] to all its facts. More depends upon these four words than any other words in the Bible. If we do not believe in the truthfulness of the text we cannot believe in a God, Christ, the Holy Ghost, the inspiration of the Scriptures, and Heaven. Therefore it can readily be seen that these four words are the foundation of the Bible.

Is this text true? If it is false then everything else in the Bible is false. If I did not believe in the truthfulness of this text I could not believe in any other words of the Bible. Thank God this text is true. “In the beginning God,” is a fact long ago established. . . . Yet agnostics, infidels, and atheists have tried (in vain) to prove to the world that God, Christ, Salvation, and Heaven, all constitute a fake. The Bible has truthfully stated: “The fool hath said in his heart there is no God.” [Psalm 14:1]

It is important that you believe in this text because otherwise you cannot believe in the special creation of man by God. Evolutionists deny the truthfulness of this text and the remainder of the Bible. (pp. 5–6)

I don’t think I could have said it any better myself! If Genesis isn’t true, then it casts doubt on the validity of the rest of Scripture. To be truly consistent, we must either believe all of it or none of it.

In a later chapter titled, “What is the origin of all life?” Rev. Whitwell begins by summarizing how evolutionists answer the question and then proceeds with what should be the Christian’s response.

Second, let the Bible tell us how all life came into existence. The book of Genesis is the best authority on creation in the all the world. You need not go any farther or search any longer for a better authority. There are two words in the book of Genesis that explain it all, namely, “God created.” This tells us that all life is a product of the creative hand of Almighty God. Therefore, the Bible teaches that all life is a special product of the creative hand of God, who created all things both in heaven and earth. (p. 20)

Yes, the Bible is the ultimate authority, and there is none better, since God was an eyewitness to His own creation!

In a concluding chapter, “What is the influence of evolution?” Rev. Whitwell expounds on the problems inherent in secular education.

Let me draw you another picture of the influence of evolution on the life of the individual. A child is born in a Christian home. He is taught the Lord’s prayer, and the simple story of Jesus and his power to save. He is made familiar with the Bible record of creation, and God’s plan of salvation. He is raised to go to church and Sunday school and to reverence the Word of God, ministers, and Christians everywhere. That boy completes high school and goes off to college. There he comes in contact with a teacher who teaches him that his family tree is millions of years old and that his immediate ancestors were monkeys, or related animals. He is taught that all life came from a nebular matter or a one-cell organism and that through the process of evolution this one-cell organism produced all life; that all species of every sort both in the vegetable an animal kingdom came from this one-cell organism. For four years this young man is drilled in this theory. He never hears this teacher mention the Bible, God, Christ, or the Holy Ghost. In fact the teacher leaves God out of his teaching. This young man returns home with a sheep-skin [sic] diploma in his hand but he says: “Mother, your old book of Genesis is out of date. The Bible and science do not harmonize. Science is an established fact and the Bible is nothing more than a hypothesis, therefore I am forced to discard the Bible.” This is a fair demonstration of the influence of evolution on the lives of individuals. This is exactly what takes place every year. (pp. 24-25)

How saddened Rev. Whitwell would be today knowing that many children who go to Christian colleges (see Already Compromised) have a similar experience after being taught by professing Christian professors who have compromised on God’s Word. Just as it was a call to parents of Whitwell’s time, it is a call to parents today to do their job of teaching and instilling in children the truth of God’s Word. We are blessed in modern times to have so many tools to teach children to defend their faith!

Rev. Whitwell concludes the chapter with this strong affirmation:

Personally I am one hundred per cent [sic] for the Bible, my God, my Christ, the Holy Spirit, the preservation of personal faith in all the cardinal principles of the Christian faith, the peace and progress of the world, the schools of our land, the church, the home, and the Old Time religion. I have decided that if the world wants to stray off after every kind of heresy and false doctrine, I shall continue to say: “Let others do as they may but as for me and my house we will serve the Lord.” [Joshua 24:15] (pp. 27–28)

I concur, “Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar.” (Romans 3:4) Thank you, Rev. Whitwell, for standing up for the truth of God’s Word in your time, and may we continue the legacy in the battle for the authority and truthfulness of God’s Word in our own generation.

Keep fighting the good fight of the faith!

After Libya, U.S. Seeks to LoJack Its Diplomats


By Spencer Ackerman, Wired, October 19, 2012
Among the horrors of the September assault on the Benghazi consulate was that security personnel at the diplomatic compound lost track of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens for hours. They next saw him when Libyans returned his corpse. A new program by the State Department’s security branch seeks to ensure diplomats in conflict zones can’t go missing anymore.

A recent solicitation revealed that State wants to upgrade its security to a Personnel Tracking and Locating system that could allow diplomats to check in with security personnel through their phones or other handheld devices. The “device agnostic” system would work similarly to the Blue Force Trackers that soldiers use to keep track of one another on the battlefield: a signal emanates from the device over a satellite network and appears as an icon on a digitized map monitored by State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security. Devices networked together that host the tracking software need to be able to call up a map on a web browser that shows the relative position of each user, layered over a GoogleEarth baseline.

The new system has to “display live/historical tracks with the following device information for all ingested devices: device ID, alias/call-sign, last reported latitude/longitude, last reported track receive time, and emergency status,” reads the solicitation for the system’s software. For additional security, State wants diplomats to be able to create geo-fences using the system, with automatic alerts going out to authorized users once the devices’ signal leaves (or, conceivably, enters) a perimeter.

It will never be known whether a tracker could have saved Stevens’ life. But his death provides a grim reminder of what can happen when diplomats disappear.

In an “emergency,” the State Department wants the software to “to remotely activate the microphone of audio-capable trackers”—which could allow security officials to gather intelligence on a hypothetical hostage situation.

To be very clear, there’s no way that tracking devices like these could have stopped the Libya assault from happening. They don’t substitute for understanding the dangers that lurk outside diplomatic gates or having available, competent security personnel prepared to deal with them. But the acrimony over the Benghazi debacle threatens to compel diplomats worldwide into retreating behind hardened embassy walls, rather than accepting the risks of travelling to far-flung areas where diplomacy sometimes needs to be conducted. LoJacking diplomats like they’re cars is one small way the department can mitigate those risks while still conducting vital foreign policy.

A Real American Hero- George McGovern


By Todd Gitlin, Foreign Policy, October 21, 2012

In August 1964, against his better judgment, at the behest of the usually astute Sen. J. William Fulbright, George McGovern voted for President Lyndon Johnson’s Tonkin Gulf resolution, and quickly regretted it. What made him an old-fashioned sort of liberal was his moral directness. When, in the Senate of 1970, he rose in favor of the McGovern-Hatfield bill, which would have cut off American military operations in Vietnam and withdrawn all the troops, he said this:

“Every senator in this chamber is partly responsible for sending 50,000 young Americans to an early grave. This chamber reeks of blood. Every senator here is partly responsible for that human wreckage at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval and all across our land—young men without legs, or arms, or genitals, or faces or hopes.

“There are not very many of these blasted and broken boys who think this war is a glorious adventure. Do not talk to them about bugging out, or national honor or courage. It does not take any courage at all for a congressman, or a senator, or a president to wrap himself in the flag and say we are staying in Vietnam, because it is not our blood that is being shed. But we are responsible for those young men and their lives and their hopes. And if we do not end this damnable war those young men will some day curse us for our pitiful willingness to let the executive carry the burden that the Constitution places on us.”

The bill went down, 55-39. Many more thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Laotians went down before President Richard Nixon had the grace to resign, and even then, the bill of impeachment failed to cite Nixon’s secret (from Americans, that is) bombing campaigns in Cambodia (Rep. John Conyers of the Judiciary Committee moved an additional article of impeachment, charging truthfully that Nixon submitted to Congress “false and misleading statements concerning the existence, scope and nature of American bombing operations in Cambodia.”) Many thousands of tons more napalm and Agent Orange (among other incendiary and poisonous weapons) rained down on Southeast Aside because, as McGovern would put it in his ringing acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention of 1972, “during four administrations of both parties, a terrible war has been chartered behind closed doors.”

That notorious speech became, to the neoconservatives, emblematic of American gutlessness. The neocons, then and since, did not pay so much attention to this line: “In 1968 many Americans thought they were voting to bring our sons home from Vietnam in peace, and since then 20,000 of our sons have come home in coffins.” Or this, in a reference to Nixon’s campaign of lies in 1968: “I have no secret plan for peace. I have a public plan. And as one whose heart has ached for the past 10 years over the agony of Vietnam, I will halt a senseless bombing of Indochina on Inaugural Day.” Or this: “There will be no more Asian children running ablaze from bombed-out schools. There will be no more talk of bombing the dikes or the cities of the north.”

Or this: “America must never become a second-rate nation. As one who has tasted the bitter fruits of our weakness before Pearl Harbor in 1941, I give you my pledge that if I become the president of the United States, America will keep its defenses alert and fully sufficient to meet any danger.”

No, what freaked them out was three words: “Come home, America.” The refrain was embedded like this:

“From secrecy and deception in high places; come home, America.

“From military spending so wasteful that it weakens our nation; come home, America.

“From the entrenchment of special privileges in tax favoritism; from the waste of idle lands to the joy of useful labor; from the prejudice based on race and sex; from the loneliness of the aging poor and the despair of the neglected sick—come home, America.

“Come home to the affirmation that we have a dream.”

“Isolationist,” they called him, shuddering at the South Dakotan who devoted much of his life to shipping American food around the world. To people exhausted by years of wretched, indefensible war—like me, for the first time granted a presidential candidate I could zealously vote for—these words were so, so long overdue. In many ways, they still are.

George McGovern, crushed by Richard Nixon in 1972, must be remembered as the man who stood up to recover America’s honor. R.I.P.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Common Creation Question Answered

by Bruce Malone: 

Many questions are raised by believers in evolution when presented with the evidence for creation. This article addresses some of these common questions.

How did the marsupials get to Australia?

Noah was charged with building the vessel to safeguard certain animals during the first flood (a massive and complex worldwide disaster) not with distributing them afterwards. Once Noah released the animals on Mount Ararat, natural instincts and climatic conditions determined how the redistribution of the animal population took place. As subsequent generations of animals spread across the globe, territorial prowess or chance movements would send certain groups in certain directions. 

 Those animals least suited for or least able to defend a territory would either be forced further from the landing site or exterminated. A consequence of the worldwide flood was a brief but severe ice age which locked ocean water into vast ice fields. This lowered ocean levels and created a land bridge to Australia. A similar land bridge connected Asia to Alaska during this period of Earth history allowing for the free movement of man and animals between these continents. Land movements during the ice age or the subsequent melting of the ice cut off the connection between Australia and Asia effectively isolating the unique animal life to Australia.

How could worldwide coal deposits form rapidly?

The first effect of the worldwide flood would have been the ripping up of vegetation and erosion on an unimaginable scale. As the water receded from one area, vegetation would have been deposited only to be subsequently buried as the area sank and water brought in more sediment. Thus, layer upon layer of coal would have been formed. Furthermore, it has been shown in the laboratory that vegetation can be turned in to coal in as little as one hour with sufficient heat and pressure. A recent model of coal formation is provided by a study of the catastrophic explosion of Mount St. Helens in 1980. This explosion knocked down millions of trees which ended up floating on Spirit Lake. Underneath this floating vegetation mat is a thick layer of peat consisting of tree bark and organic matter. If that organic matter were buried by a subsequent eruption, the result would be a coal seam covered by sedimentary rock. Repeated cycles would rapidly produce a series of coal seams with sediment on top of each seam. It is perfectly reasonable to believe that an enormous global flood would have rapidly created the extensive coal seams we find today.

Is “Survival of the Fittest” part of the evolution ?

Modern evolutionists have tried to distance themselves from this concept due to the obvious negative consequences of applying the principle to the social realm. Denying that survival of the fittest is part of the evolutionary process is akin to denying that one type of animal will drive another to extinction given the right conditions. Contrary to the rosy picture of animal cooperation which evolutionists like to portray, one type of animal has no qualms wiping out another in its quest to propagate itself. Wild dogs introduced to Australia are endangering native species because they are more aggressive and have no natural enemies. Sounds like “survival of the fittest” doesn’t it? Survival of the fittest has always been an integral part of the evolutionary theory.

If we are also animals that have evolved according to this basic principle of evolution; why shouldn’t we extend this principle to the social realm? Why shouldn’t we eliminate weaker classes of humans that compete for what we feel we need? Evolution taken to its logical conclusion leads to a savage world akin to Hitler’s Nazi Germany when the strong determine what is right. It was no coincidence that Hitler was strongly influenced by the writings of Darwin.

It is a slap in God’s face and a distortion of Scripture to believe that evolution, with its driving mechanism of survival of the fittest, would be a loving God’s method for creating and preserving us.

The Heart of It All: Salvation


By Peter

October 23, 2012
God’s Plan

The core teaching of the New Testament can be found in one of the most beautiful verses of Scripture:



For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.[1]

This verse reveals the amazing truth that the Creator of the universe loved the human race so much that He sent the second Person of the Trinity—God the Son, Jesus—to become human and to die in our place for the sins we have committed, so that we wouldn’t have to suffer the penalty for those sins even though we deserve to. We have the opportunity to receive everlasting life because Jesus has paid the price for our sins through His sacrifice.

God’s plan of salvation, which was decided upon before the creation of the world, is rooted in God’s love for humankind. God’s motivation is love. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit love us and made a way for us to be saved from the ultimate consequence of sin—spiritual death and separation from God in the afterlife, which is called hell in Scripture.

Some people have the impression that God is a cruel and angry God: that He judges people harshly because He is personally offended that they sinned against Him, and therefore He selfishly demands that they be punished. The true picture is very different. Because God’s nature includes the attributes of holiness, righteousness, justice, and wrath, in order to be true to His divine nature He must judge sin. He could have justly punished every human being for their sins. Instead, because His divine nature also includes the attributes of love, mercy and grace, His wish was that no one should perish,[2] and to that end He has made a way in which humans can be redeemed. That redemption is rooted in His love, because He “so loved the world.” His love is such that even though we are sinners, and have sinned against Him, He has, in love, made a way that we can be saved from the merited judgment for our sins. God’s plan of salvation is the manifestation of His mercy and love for humankind.

God shows His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.[3]

In this the love of God was made manifest among us, that God sent His only Son into the world, so that we might live through Him. In this is love, not that we have loved God but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.[4]
From the Beginning

God knew, before creating the universe, that human beings created with free will would sin, so He made a way to save humanity from the penalty for sin through His plan of salvation. His plan for the salvation of humankind enabled Him to be true to all aspects of His divine nature: His holiness, righteousness, and wrath, and His love, mercy, and grace.

God’s desire is to save humans, to redeem them, to reconcile them with Him, while remaining true to His nature. He was under no obligation to save us; He could have simply let all humans suffer the penalty of sin, but He didn’t. In His love for us, the triune God made a way to redeem us. God had the plan of salvation from the beginning, which was put into play starting with Adam and Eve’s first sin and which culminated in Jesus’ death and resurrection.

Since God is the omniscient Creator, it was no surprise to Him that Adam and Eve sinned. He knew that they would freely choose to disobey Him, and in His foresight, He had already designed His plan of salvation. When God told Adam and Eve the consequences of their sin, He also spoke to the serpent, saying:



I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.[5]

From the very beginning, God said that an offspring of the woman would bruise or crush the head of the serpent—Satan—while Satan would only bruise his foot. At the time that the first sin was committed by humanity, God was already foretelling how Jesus would defeat Satan.

His plan of salvation included calling out a people, Israel, to whom He would reveal Himself and give His commandments. It was through His words spoken to Israel that God revealed knowledge about Himself, the one true God, and His law. Israel guarded and passed on His revelation from generation to generation, thus ensuring its preservation. It was through the lineage of Israel that He sent His Son as the God-man, through whom He brought salvation to humanity.

The history of Israel is the history of God laying the groundwork for the salvation of humanity through Jesus.[6] The Old Testament not only contains prophecies about the Messiah’s life and mission, but also numerous foreshadows of the salvation to come through His incarnate Son. When speaking about the Old Testament, David Berg wrote:



God had a hard time getting the children of Israel out of the idolatry of Egypt and had to lead them through Moses, with the Law as their schoolteacher, by childish little illustrations and rituals, little material object lessons—the Tabernacle, the Ark, animal sacrifices, and the blood of beasts.—Types and shadows, mere pictures of the spiritual realities and eternal verities. He had to take what they understood, the things and forms with which they were familiar in the religions of Egypt and other heathen nations around them, in a fatherly attempt to audio-visualize for them the genuine spiritual truths of the mature adult true worship of God Himself. As the Apostle says, these were all “figures of the true,” mere visual likenesses or illustrations of the real unseen things of the Spirit! In the Old Testament were the illustrations; in the present New Testament time are the spiritual truths which we have now by faith alone (John 1:17).[7]
Old Testament Types and Shadows

In order to gain a deeper understanding of salvation and redemption, of why Jesus had to die on the cross in order for us to be forgiven for our sins and become reconciled with God, it’s important to review some of the “types and shadows” within the Old Testament. We’ll focus here only on those which are directly connected to Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross.

Throughout the book of Genesis there were sacrifices made to God, beginning with Cain and Abel, then continuing with Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and others. One particular story, that of Abraham being asked by God to sacrifice his son Isaac, prefigures God’s sacrifice of His Son for the sins of humanity. When Isaac asked his father where the lamb for the sacrifice was, Abraham said that God would provide it. When Abraham was about to slay his son on the altar, the Lord then showed him a ram that was caught in the bushes, which Abraham sacrificed instead of his son. The substitution of the lamb for Isaac as a sacrifice to God portrays the concept of substitutional sacrifice, which is the basis for the animal sacrificial system which God later gave to Israel through Moses, as a means of atoning for their sins. God’s provision of the ram foreshadows His supply of a sacrifice, His Son, for the sins of humanity.

Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering and laid it on Isaac his son. And he took in his hand the fire and the knife. So they went both of them together. And Isaac said to his father Abraham, “My father!” And he said, “Here am I, my son.” He said, “Behold, the fire and the wood, but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?” Abraham said, “God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering, my son.” So they went both of them together … And Abraham lifted up his eyes and looked, and behold, behind him was a ram, caught in a thicket by his horns. And Abraham went and took the ram and offered it up as a burnt offering instead of his son.[8]

Centuries later, when the descendants of Abraham, the Hebrews, were enslaved in Egypt, God spoke to Moses and told him that He would deliver the Hebrews out of the hands of the Egyptians. When the pharaoh of Egypt wouldn’t let them go, God informed Moses that on a certain night He was going to kill all the firstborn in Egypt, both men and animals. He commanded each Hebrew household to kill a year-old sheep or goat and to sprinkle its blood on the door frames of their houses. If they would do so, the firstborn in the houses with blood on the doorposts would be spared the judgment of God. Those without the blood would not be spared.

The Lord said to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, “This month shall be for you the beginning of months. It shall be the first month of the year for you. Tell all the congregation of Israel that on the tenth day of this month every man shall take a lamb according to their fathers’ houses, a lamb for a household … Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male a year old. You may take it from the sheep or from the goats, and you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of this month, when the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill their lambs at twilight. Then they shall take some of the blood and put it on the two doorposts and the lintel of the houses in which they eat it. They shall eat the flesh that night, roasted on the fire; with unleavened bread and bitter herbs they shall eat it. For I will pass through the land of Egypt that night, and I will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am the Lord. The blood shall be a sign for you, on the houses where you are. And when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and no plague will befall you to destroy you, when I strike the land of Egypt” … Then Moses called all the elders of Israel and said to them, “Go and select lambs for yourselves according to your clans, and kill the Passover lamb.”[9]

Their obedience in sacrificing the Passover lamb and sprinkling its blood on the doorframe was the key to the Hebrews being spared from God’s judgment, and resulted in them being freed from bondage and slavery. In the second year after their deliverance from Egypt[10] God instructed Moses to initiate the Levitical sacrificial system in which animal sacrifice would atone for sin. Authors Lewis and Demarest give the following excellent basic explanation of this sacrificial system:



In the burnt offering, the fellowship or peace offering, the sin offering, and the guilt offering, a sacrificial procedure was followed that generally involved the following elements: (1) an unblemished animal, connoting the idea of moral perfection, was presented at the door of the sanctuary by the offerer. (2) The offerer places his hands on the animal’s head, signifying identification with the victim and the transfer of the penalty of sin to the substitute. (3) The animal was slain by the offerer (in later times by the priest), signifying that death is the just punishment for sin. (4) The priest sprinkled the blood of the victim on the altar and around the base of it, the blood representing the life of the victim. And (5) the offering, in part or in whole, was burned on the altar of burnt offering, its fragrance ascending to God as a pleasing aroma. Repeatedly Scripture indicates that the purpose of these sacrifices was “to make atonement” for the offerer (Leviticus 1:4; 4:20; 5:13; Numbers 5:8; 8:12; 15:25).[11]

Every year on the Day of Atonement a special sacrifice was made for the sins of all the people. First the high priest made an offering for his own sins, followed by a special offering for the people. Again, Lewis and Demarest give a concise explanation:



The high priest sacrificed the first male goat brought by the people as a sin-offering and sprinkled its blood on and in front of the “atonement cover” in the Holy of Holies, thereby expiating the uncleanness of the people (Leviticus 16:15–19) and making atonement. This act of blood shedding, according to Leviticus 17:11, represents God’s ordained way of securing atonement. The high priest then laid his hands on the head of the second goat (the “scapegoat”) and confessed all the sins of the community, thus symbolically transferring guilt from the people to the victim. The second goat became the sin-bearer, as it irretrievably carried the sins and iniquities of the people into the wilderness.[12]

In these Old Testament sacrifices we can see the concepts of atonement and reconciliation for sins through substitution. In the same way as the ram was sacrificed in Isaac’s place, the animals were sacrificed for the sins of the offerer. These Old Testament sacrifices atoned for past sins, but needed to be repeated as new sins were committed.


God the Redeemer

Besides these types and shadows of atonement for sin through the substitutionary sacrifice of another in the place of the sinner, and sins of all being placed on a single “scapegoat,” there is another foreshadow in the Old Testament of things to come; namely, the understanding of God being the “Redeemer.”

In the exodus from Egypt, God Himself, through His mighty acts, delivered His people from bondage and slavery. He redeemed them and freed them. Speaking to Moses, He said:



Say therefore to the people of Israel, “I am the Lord, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will deliver you from slavery to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with great acts of judgment.”[13]

From this point on, God was called the Redeemer.

They remembered that God was their rock, the Most High God their redeemer.[14]

It is because the Lord loves you and is keeping the oath that He swore to your fathers, that the Lord has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.[15]

You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord your God redeemed you.[16]

The deliverance of the Hebrews from slavery was the work of God. The Hebrews weren’t able to deliver themselves from the bondage of the Egyptians. God is the one who pronounced judgment on the Egyptians when pharaoh would not let the Israelites go, and brought upon them the plagues that resulted in the miraculous deliverance of the Hebrew people. Through the sacrifice of the Passover lamb, God preserved the Hebrews from the punishment He inflicted upon the Egyptians.

God delivered the Hebrews through supernatural acts and wonders by His own hand, and not by their works. This was a foreshadow of the grace by which He redeems us through the work of God in salvation. It’s His work, not ours, which saves us. Salvation is available only by His grace, mercy, and love.

God’s plan of salvation through the death and resurrection of Jesus was His plan of redemption for human beings before humans ever existed. Within the Old Testament He begins to reveal His plan; and then in New Testament times when John the Baptist proclaims, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world,”[17] the fullness of His plan begins to be fully revealed.


The Lamb of God

The fulfillment of God’s plan of redemption through Jesus’ death, His sacrifice of Himself in our place through His blood shed for our sins, is repeatedly spoken of throughout the New Testament. He is the Lamb sacrificed, the one who has died in our stead, and who, like the scapegoat, has taken our sins upon Himself. He is the Redeemer who saves us from the slavery of sin. His death and resurrection is the culmination of the Old Testament types and shadows. It is the fulfillment of God’s plan of redemption. God has been holy, righteous, and just to His creations. He has been loving, merciful, and gracious. And we are beneficiaries of the greatest sacrifice ever made.



Christ loved us and gave Himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.[18]



We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all … For by a single offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.[19]

He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for His own sins and then for those of the people, since He did this once for all when He offered up Himself.[20]

He entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of His own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.[21]

You were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your forefathers, not with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot.[22]

Now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.[23]



In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace.[24]



God shows His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by His blood, much more shall we be saved by Him from the wrath of God.[25]

Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.[26]

This is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.[27]



[1] John 3:16 NKJ.


[2] The Lord is not slow to fulfill His promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance (2 Peter 3:9).


[3] Romans 5:8.


[4] 1 John 4:9–10.


[5] Genesis 3:15.


[6] Jack Cottrell, What the Bible Says About God the Redeemer (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1987), 402.


[7] David Berg, Flesh or Spirit? February 1971.


[8] Genesis 22:6–8,13.


[9] Exodus 12:1–3,5–8,12–13,21.


[10] In the first month in the second year, on the first day of the month, the tabernacle was erected … And he set the altar of burnt offering at the entrance of the tabernacle of the tent of meeting, and offered on it the burnt offering and the grain offering, as the Lord had commanded Moses (Exodus 40:17,29).


[11] Gordon R. Lewis and Bruce A. Demarest, Integrative Theology, Volume 2 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1996), 383–384.


[12] Gordon R. Lewis and Bruce A. Demarest, Integrative Theology, Volume 3 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1996), 184.


[13] Exodus 6:6.


[14] Psalm 78:35.


[15] Deuteronomy 7:8.


[16] Deuteronomy 15:15.


[17] John 1:29.


[18] Ephesians 5:2.


[19] Hebrews 10:10,14.


[20] Hebrews 7:27.


[21] Hebrews 9:12–14.


[22] 1 Peter 1:18–19.


[23] Ephesians 2:13.


[24] Ephesians 1:7.


[25] Romans 5:8–9.


[26] 1 Corinthians 5:7.


[27] Matthew 26:28.



Copyright © 2012 The Family International.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith