Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Is This the End of Christianity in the Middle East?

By Eliza Griswold, NY Times, Magazine, July 22, 2015

There was something about Diyaa that his wife’s brothers didn’t like. He was a tyrant, they said, who, after 14 years of marriage, wouldn’t let their sister, Rana, 31, have her own mobile phone. He isolated her from friends and family, guarding her jealously. Although Diyaa and Rana were both from Qaraqosh, the largest Christian city in Iraq, they didn’t know each other before their families arranged their marriage. It hadn’t gone especially well. Rana was childless, and according to the brothers, Diyaa was cheap. The house he rented was dilapidated, not fit for their sister to live in.

Qaraqosh is on the Nineveh Plain, a 1,500-square-mile plot of contested land that lies between Iraq’s Kurdish north and its Arab south. Until last summer, this was a flourishing city of 50,000, in Iraq’s breadbasket. Wheat fields and chicken and cattle farms surrounded a town filled with coffee shops, bars, barbers, gyms and other trappings of modern life.

Then, last June, ISIS took Mosul, less than 20 miles west. The militants painted a red Arabic “n,” for Nasrane, a slur, on Christian homes. They took over the municipal water supply, which feeds much of the Nineveh Plain. Many residents who managed to escape fled to Qaraqosh, bringing with them tales of summary executions and mass beheadings. The people of Qaraqosh feared that ISIS would continue to extend the group’s self-styled caliphate, which now stretches from Turkey’s border with Syria to south of Fallujah in Iraq, an area roughly the size of Indiana.

In the weeks before advancing on Qaraqosh, ISIS cut the city’s water. As the wells dried up, some left and others talked about where they might go. In July, reports that ISIS was about to take Qaraqosh sent thousands fleeing, but ISIS didn’t arrive, and within a couple of days, most people returned. Diyaa refused to leave. He was sure ISIS wouldn’t take the town.

A week later, the Kurdish forces, known as the peshmerga, whom the Iraqi government had charged with defending Qaraqosh, retreated. (“We didn’t have the weapons to stop them,” Jabbar Yawar, the secretary general of the peshmerga, said later.) The city was defenseless; the Kurds had not allowed the people of the Nineveh Plain to arm themselves and had rounded up their weapons months earlier. Tens of thousands jammed into cars and fled along the narrow highway leading to the relative safety of Erbil, the Kurdish capital of Northern Iraq, 50 miles away.

Piling 10 family members into a Toyota pickup, Rana’s brothers ran, too. From the road, they called Diyaa repeatedly, pleading with him to escape with Rana. “She can’t go,” Diyaa told one of Rana’s brothers, as the brother later recounted to me. “ISIS isn’t coming. This is all a lie.”

The next morning Diyaa and Rana woke to a nearly empty town. Only 100 or so people remained in Qaraqosh, mostly those too poor, old or ill to travel. A few, like Diyaa, hadn’t taken the threat seriously. One man passed out drunk in his backyard and woke the next morning to ISIS taking the town.

As Diyaa and Rana hid in their basement, ISIS broke into stores and looted them. Over the next two weeks, militants rooted out most of the residents cowering in their homes, searching house to house. The armed men roamed Qaraqosh on foot and in pickups. They marked the walls of farms and businesses “Property of the Islamic State.” ISIS now held not just Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, but also Ramadi and Fallujah. (During the Iraq War, the fighting in these three places accounted for 30 percent of U.S. casualties.) In Qaraqosh, as in Mosul, ISIS offered residents a choice: They could either convert or pay the jizya, the head tax levied against all “People of the Book”: Christians, Zoroastrians and Jews. If they refused, they would be killed, raped or enslaved, their wealth taken as spoils of war.

No one came for Diyaa and Rana. ISIS hadn’t bothered to search inside their ramshackle house. Then, on the evening of Aug. 21, word spread that ISIS was willing to offer what they call “exile and hardship” to the last people in Qaraqosh. They would be cast out of their homes with nothing, but at least they would survive. A kindly local mullah was going door to door with the good news. Hoping to save Diyaa and Rana, their neighbors told him where they were hiding.

Diyaa and Rana readied themselves to leave. The last residents of Qaraqosh were to report the next morning to the local medical center, to receive “checkups” before being deported from the Islamic State. Everyone knew the checkups were really body searches to prevent residents from taking valuables out of Qaraqosh. Before ISIS let residents go–if they let them go–it was very likely they would steal everything they had, as residents heard they had done elsewhere.

Diyaa and Rana called their families to let them know what was happening. “Take nothing with you,” her brothers told Diyaa. But Diyaa, as usual, didn’t listen. He stuffed Rana’s clothes with money, gold, passports and their identity papers. Although she was terrified of being caught–she could be beheaded for taking goods from the Islamic State–Rana didn’t protest; she didn’t dare. According to her brothers, Diyaa could be violent. (Diyaa’s brother Nimrod disputed this, just as he does Diyaa’s alleged cheapness.)

At 7 the next morning, Diyaa and Rana made the five-minute walk from their home to Qaraqosh Medical Center Branch No. 2, a yellow building with red-and-green trim next to the city’s only mosque. As the crowd gathered, Diyaa phoned both his family and hers. “We’re standing in front of the medical center right now,” he said, as his brother-in-law recalled it. “There are buses and cars here. Thank God, they’re going to let us go.”

It was a searing day. Temperatures reach as high as 110 degrees on the Nineveh Plain in summer. By 9 a.m., ISIS had separated men from women. Seated in the crowd, the local ISIS emir, Saeed Abbas, surveyed the female prisoners. His eyes lit on Aida Hana Noah, 43, who was holding her 3-year-old daughter, Christina. Noah said she felt his gaze and gripped Christina closer. For two weeks, she’d been at home with her daughter and her husband, Khadr Azzou Abada, 65. He was blind, and Aida decided that the journey north would be too hard for him. So she sent her 25-year-old son with her three other children, who ranged in age from 10 to 13, to safety. She thought Christina too young to be without her mother.

ISIS scanned the separate groups of men and women. “You” and “you,” they pointed. Some of the captives realized what ISIS was doing, survivors told me later, dividing the young and healthy from the older and weak. One, Talal Abdul Ghani, placed a final call to his family before the fighters confiscated his phone. He had been publicly whipped for refusing to convert to Islam, as his sisters, who fled from other towns, later recounted. “Let me talk to everybody,” he wept. “I don’t think they’re letting me go.” It was the last time they heard from him.

No one was sure where either bus was going. As the jihadists directed the weaker and older to the first of two buses, one 49-year-old woman, Sahar, protested that she’d been separated from her husband, Adel. Although he was 61, he was healthy and strong and had been held back. One fighter reassured her, saying, “These others will follow.” Sahar, Aida and her blind husband, Khadr, boarded the first bus. The driver, a man they didn’t know, walked down the aisle. Without a word, he took Christina from her mother’s arms. “Please, in the name of God, give her back,” Aida pleaded. The driver carried Christina into the medical center. Then he returned without the child. As the people in the bus prayed to leave town, Aida kept begging for Christina. Finally, the driver went inside again. He came back empty-handed.

Aida has told this story before with slight variations. As she, her husband and another witness recounted it to me, she was pleading for her daughter when the emir himself appeared, flanked by two fighters. He was holding Christina against his chest. Aida fought her way off the bus.

“Please give me my daughter,” she said.

The emir cocked his head at his bodyguards.

“Get on the bus before we kill you,” one said.

Christina reached for her mother.

“Get on the bus before we slaughter your family,” he repeated.

As the bus rumbled north out of town, Aida sat crumpled in a seat next to her husband. Many of the 40-odd people on it began to weep. “We cried for Christina and ourselves,” Sahar said. The bus took a sharp right toward the Khazir River that marked an edge of the land ISIS had seized. Several minutes later, the driver stopped and ordered everyone off.

Led by a shepherd who had traveled this path with his flock, the sick and elderly descended and began to walk to the Khazir River. The journey took 12 hours.

The second bus–the one filled with the young and healthy–headed north, too. But instead of turning east, it turned west, toward Mosul. Among its captives was Diyaa. Rana wasn’t with him. She had been bundled into a third vehicle, a new four-wheel drive, along with an 18-year-old girl named Rita, who’d come to Qaraqosh to help her elderly father flee.

The women were driven to Mosul, where, the next day, Rana’s captor called her brothers. “If you come near her, I’ll blow the house up. I’m wearing a suicide vest,” he said. Then he passed the phone to Rana, who whispered, in Syriac, the story of what happened to her. Her brothers were afraid to ask any questions lest her answers make trouble for her. She said, “I’m taking care of a 3-year-old named Christina.”

For more than a decade, extremists have targeted Christians and other minorities, who often serve as stand-ins for the West. This was especially true in Iraq after the U.S. invasion, which caused hundreds of thousands to flee. “Since 2003, we’ve lost priests, bishops and more than 60 churches were bombed,” Bashar Warda, the Chaldean Catholic archbishop of Erbil, said. With the fall of Saddam Hussein, Christians began to leave Iraq in large numbers, and the population shrank to less than 500,000 today from as many as 1.5 million in 2003.

The Arab Spring only made things worse. As dictators like Mubarak in Egypt and Qaddafi in Libya were toppled, their longstanding protection of minorities also ended. Now, ISIS is looking to eradicate Christians and other minorities altogether. The group twists the early history of Christians in the region–their subjugation by the sword–to legitimize its millenarian enterprise. Recently, ISIS posted videos delineating the second-class status of Christians in the caliphate. Those unwilling to pay the jizya tax or to convert would be destroyed, the narrator warned, as the videos culminated in the now-infamous scenes of Egyptian and Ethiopian Christians in Libya being marched onto the beach and beheaded, their blood running into the surf.

The future of Christianity in the region of its birth is now uncertain. “How much longer can we flee before we and other minorities become a story in a history book?” says Nuri Kino, a journalist and founder of the advocacy group Demand for Action. According to a Pew study, more Christians are now faced with religious persecution than at any time since their early history. “ISIL has put a spotlight on the issue,” says Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives, whose parents are from the region and who advocates on behalf of Eastern Christians. “Christianity is under an existential threat.”

One of the main pipelines for Christians fleeing the Middle East runs through Lebanon. This spring, thousands of Christians from villages in northeastern Syria along the Khabur River found shelter in Lebanon as they fled an ISIS assault in which 230 people were seized for ransom. This wasn’t the first time that members of this tight-knit community had been driven from their homes. Many of these villagers were descendants of those who, in 1933, fled Iraq after a massacre of Assyrian Christians left 3,000 dead in one day.

On a recent Saturday, 50 of these refugees gathered for a funeral at the Assyrian Church of the East in Beirut, which sits on the steep slope of Mount Lebanon, not far from a BMW-Mini Cooper dealership and a Miss Virgin Jeans shop. The priest, the Rev. Sargon Zoumaya, buttoned his black cassock over a blue clerical shirt as he prepared to officiate over the burial of Benjamin Ishaya, who arrived just months before, displaced from one of the villages ISIS attacked. (He had died of complications following a head wound inflicted by a jihadist.)

“We’re afraid our whole society will vanish,” said Zoumaya, who left his Khabur River village more than a decade ago to study in Lebanon. He picked up his prayer book and headed downstairs to the parish house. The church was helping to care for 1,500 Syrian families. “It’s too much pressure on us, more than we can handle,” he said. The families didn’t want to live in the notoriously overcrowded Lebanese refugee camps that had filled with one-and-a-half million Syrians fleeing the civil war. They no longer wanted to live among Muslims. Instead they crammed into apartments with exorbitant rents that the church subsidized as best it could.

Inside the church, men and women sat in two separate circles. A young woman passed out Turkish coffee in paper cups. Waves of keening rose from the ring of women, led by Ishaya’s widow. Wearing an olive green suit, she sat at the head of the open coffin, weeping, as women touched her husband’s body. Nearby, her son, Bassam Ishaya, nursed two broken feet. He’d been trying to support his family by repairing couches until one dropped on him. The Ishaya family left Syria with nothing. ISIS, Bassam said, told them they “either had to pay the jizya, convert or be killed.” He pointed to a blue crucifix tattoo on his right arm. “Because of this, I had to wear long sleeves,” he said.

To escape, the Ishayas were airlifted from Al-Hasakah, a town in northeastern Syria, which had been under the joint control of the Assad government and the Kurds but has since largely fallen to ISIS, and flown 400 miles to Damascus. From there, they drove to the Lebanese border. Syrian Air charged $180 for the flights; Assad’s government charged $50 a person, the refugees at the funeral said.

Since the civil war broke out in Syria in 2011, Assad has allowed Christians to leave the country. Nearly a third of Syria’s Christians, about 600,000, have found themselves with no choice but to flee the country, driven out by extremist groups like the Nusra Front and now ISIS. “As president, he made the sheep and the wolf walk together,” Bassam said. “We don’t care if he stays or goes, we just want security.” Assad has used the rise of ISIS to solidify his own support among those who remain, saying that he is the only thing standing in the way of an ISIS takeover.

Like most of the refugees in the parish house, Bassam wasn’t planning on returning to Syria. He was searching for a way to the West. His brother Yussef moved to Chicago two years earlier. He didn’t have a job yet, but his wife worked at Walmart. Maybe they would help. He wanted to leave like everyone else, although it would hasten the end of Christianity in Syria. No one would go home after what ISIS had done. “Christians will all leave,” he said. “What can I do? I have four kids, I can’t leave them here to die.”

After his father’s coffin was sealed, Bassam and the rest of the male mourners filed out. As the women looked on, the men filled waiting cars and drove, past a cement factory, to a nearby graveyard. The mourners lifted the coffin into a wall of doors, which resembled the shelving units in a morgue. This was a pauper’s grave. Since the family couldn’t afford the fee, the church paid $500 to place the coffin here. In a few months, the body would be quietly burned, although cremation is anathema to Eastern Christian doctrine. The ashes would take up less space in this overcrowded city of the dead.

Later, Zoumaya talked of his family members, who were among the 230 captured by ISIS. At noon, on the day ISIS arrived in his wife’s village, Zoumaya called his father-in-law to check in.

“This is ISIS,” said the man who answered.

“Please let my family go,” the priest begged. “They’ve done nothing to you. They’re not fighting.”

“These people belong to us now,” the man said. “Who is this calling?”

Zoumaya hung up. He feared what ISIS might do if they knew who he was. But this was not the end of his communication with them; they sent him photographs via WhatsApp. He pulled out his phone to show them. Here was a jihadi on a motorcycle, grinning in front of the charred grocery store that belonged to his father. Here was a photo, before ISIS arrived, of a 3-month-old’s baptism. Here was a snapshot of the family dressed up for Somikka, Assyrian Halloween.

“All these people are missing,” he said.

ISIS wants $23 million for these captives, $100,000 each, a sum no one can pay.

This spring the U.N. Security Council met to discuss the plight of Iraq’s religious minorities. “If we attend to minority rights only after slaughter has begun, then we have already failed,” Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, the high commissioner for Human Rights, said. After the conference ended, there was mounting anger at American inaction. Although the airstrikes were effective, since October 2013, the United States has given just $416 million in humanitarian aid, which falls far short of what is needed. “Americans and the West were telling us they came to bring democracy, freedom and prosperity,” Louis Sako, the Chaldean Catholic Patriarch of Babylon who addressed the Security Council, wrote to me in a recent email. “What we are living is anarchy, war, death and the plight of three million refugees.”

Of the 3.1 million displaced Iraqis, 85 percent are Sunnis. No one has suffered more at the hands of ISIS than fellow Muslims. Other religious minorities have been affected as well and in large numbers: the Yazidis, who were trapped on Mount Sinjar in Northern Iraq last summer, as ISIS threatened them with genocide; as well as Shia Turkmen; Shabak; Kaka’i; and the Mandeans, who follow John the Baptist. “Everyone has seen the forced conversions, crucifixions and beheadings,” David Saperstein, the United States ambassador at large for religious freedom, said. “To see these communities, primarily Christians, but also the Yazidis and others, persecuted in such large numbers is deeply alarming.”

It has been nearly impossible for two U.S. presidents–Bush, a conservative evangelical; and Obama, a progressive liberal–to address the plight of Christians explicitly for fear of appearing to play into the crusader and “clash of civilizations” narratives the West is accused of embracing. In 2007, when Al Qaeda was kidnapping and killing priests in Mosul, Nina Shea, who was then a U.S. commissioner for religious freedom, says she approached the secretary of state at the time, Condoleezza Rice, who told her the United States didn’t intervene in “sectarian” issues. Rice now says that protecting religious freedom in Iraq was a priority both for her and for the Bush administration. But the targeted violence and mass Christian exodus remained unaddressed. “One of the blind spots of the Bush administration was the inability to grapple with this as a direct byproduct of the invasion,” says Timothy Shah, the associate director of Georgetown University’s Religious Freedom Project.

More recently, the White House has been criticized for eschewing the term “Christian” altogether. When ISIS massacred Egyptian Copts in Libya this winter, the State Department came under fire for referring to the victims merely as “Egyptian citizens.” Daniel Philpott, a professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame, says, “When ISIS is no longer said to have religious motivations nor the minorities it attacks to have religious identities, the Obama administration’s caution about religion becomes excessive.”

Last fall, Obama did refer to Christians and other religious minorities by name in a speech, saying, “we cannot allow these communities to be driven from their ancient homelands.” When ISIS threatened to eradicate the Yazidis, “it was the United States that stepped in to beat back the militants,” Alistair Baskey, a spokesman for the National Security Council, says. In northeastern Syria, where ISIS is still launching attacks against Assyrian Christian villages, the U.S. military recently come to their aid, Baskey added. Refugees are a thornier issue. Of the more than 122,000 Iraqi refugees admitted to the United States, nearly 40 percent already belong to oppressed minorities. Admitting more would be difficult. “There are limits to what the international community can do,” Saperstein said.

Eshoo, the Democratic congresswoman, is working to establish priority refugee status for minorities who want to leave Iraq. “It’s a hair ball,” she says. “The average time for admittance to the United States is more than 16 months, and that’s too long. Many will die.” But it can be difficult to rally widespread support. The Middle East’s Christians often favor Palestine over Israel. And because support of Israel is central to the Christian Right–Israel must be occupied by the Jews before Jesus can return–this stance distances Eastern Christians from a powerful lobby that might otherwise champion their cause. Recently, Ted Cruz admonished an audience of Middle Eastern Christians at an In Defense of Christians event in Washington, telling them that Christians “have no better ally than the Jewish state.” Cruz was booed.

Earlier this year, Lebanon closed its borders to almost everyone escaping the war in Syria but made an exception for Christians fleeing ISIS. When the extremists attacked the villages along the Khabur River, the interior minister, Nouhad Machnouk, ordered the official in charge of the border to allow Christians to enter the country. “I can’t put this in writing,” the border official said. Machnouk replied, “O.K., say it aloud, word by word.”

Machnouk told me this story on a recent evening. “They’re paying much, much, much more than others,” in both Syria and Iraq, he said. “They’re not Sunni and not Shia, but they’re paying more than both.”

The front line against ISIS in Northern Iraq is marked by an earthen berm that runs for hundreds of miles over the Nineveh Plain. A string of Christian towns now stands empty, and the Kurdish forces occupy what, for thousands of years, was Assyrian, Chaldean and Syriac land. In one, Telskuf, seized by ISIS last year, the main square is overgrown with brambles and thistles. It was once a thriving market town. Every Thursday, hundreds came to buy clothes, honey and vegetables. Telskuf was home to 7,000 people; now only three remain.

The Nineveh Plain Forces, a 500-member Assyrian Christian militia, patrols the town. The N.P.F. is one of five Assyrian militias formed during the past year after the rout of ISIS. It shares a double aim with two other militias, Dwekh Nawsha, an all-volunteer force of around 100, and the Nineveh Plains Protection Units, a battalion of more than 300: to help liberate Christian lands from ISIS and to protect their people, possibly as part of a nascent national guard, when they return home. The two other militias are the Syriac Military Council, which is fighting alongside the Kurds in northeastern Syria, and the Babylonian Brigades, which operate under Iraq’s Shia-dominated militias.

A few of these militias are aided by a handful of American, Canadian and British citizens, who, frustrated with their governments’ lack of response to ISIS, have traveled to Syria and Iraq to fight on their own. Some come in the name of fellow Christians. Some come to relive their roles in the United States invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan–or to make amends for them. One American named Matthew VanDyke, the founder of Sons of Liberty International, a security company, has provided free training for the N.P.U. and is now about to work with a second militia, Dwekh Nawsha. VanDyke, who is 36, traveled to Libya in 2011 to fight against Muammar el-Qaddafi’s forces; he was captured and spent 166 days in solitary confinement before escaping and returning to combat. He has no formal military training, but since last fall, he has brought American veterans to Iraq to help the N.P.U., including James Halterman, a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq, who found the group on the Internet after watching a segment about Westerners fighting ISIS on Fox News. The United States government does not support groups like VanDyke’s. “Americans who have traveled to Iraq to fight are not part of U.S. efforts in the region,” Joseph Pennington, the consul general in Erbil, says. “We wish they would not come here.”

In Iraq, the militias operate at the front only with the approval of the Kurdish peshmerga, who are using the fight against ISIS to expand their territory into the Nineveh Plain, long a disputed territory between Arabs and Kurds. Even to travel 1,000 yards between bases and forward posts, the Christian militias must ask the Kurds for permission. The Kurds are looking to integrate all the Christian militias into their force; they have succeeded with the N.P.F. and two others. But the N.P.U. remains wary. They fear that the Kurds are using the Christian cause to seize territory for a greater Kurdistan. And because the Kurdish forces abandoned them as ISIS approached, the militias want the right to protect their own people. For now, they make do with the help they can find. Romeo Hakari, the head of the N.P.F., said, “We want U.S. trainers, but we can’t even afford to buy weapons.” After his militia purchased 20 AK-47s in an open market in Erbil, the Kurds gave them 100 more.

Other than a daily mortar or two launched by ISIS from a village a mile and a half away, the area the N.P.U. patrolled was a sleepy target. After coalition airstrikes pushed ISIS out of Telskuf last summer, the group retreated about a mile and a half to the southwest. Beyond a bulldozed trench and a line of burlap sandbags littered with sunflower-seed shells, 12 black flags fluttered over a village. Three weeks earlier, at 4:20 a.m., two suicide bombers carrying a ladder to place over the trench attacked this forward post. The suicide attack was foiled after the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS launched airstrikes, which killed 13 ISIS fighters, Manaf Yussef, a Kurdish security official in charge of this front, said. “Without airstrikes, we’d lose,” he said.

Even if ISIS is defeated, the fate of religious minorities in Syria and Iraq remains bleak. Unless minorities are given some measure of security, those who can leave are likely to do so. Nina Shea of the Hudson Institute, a conservative policy center, says that the situation has grown so dire that Iraqi Christians must either be allowed full residency in Kurdistan, including the right to work, or helped to leave. Others argue that it is essential that minorities have their own autonomous region. Exile is a death knell for these communities, activists say. “We’ve been here as an ethnicity for 6,000 years and as Christians for 1,700 years,” says Dr. Srood Maqdasy, a member of the Kurdish Parliament. “We have our own culture, language and tradition. If we live within other communities, all of this will be dissolved within two generations.”

The practical solution, according to many Assyrian Christians, is to establish a safe haven on the Nineveh Plain. “If the West could take in so many refugees and the U.N.H.C.R. handle an operation like that, then we wouldn’t ask for a permanent solution,” says Nuri Kino, of A Demand for Action. “But the most realistic option is returning home.”

“We don’t have time to wait for solutions,” said the Rev. Emanuel Youkhana, the head of Christian Aid Program Northern Iraq. “For the first time in 2,000 years, there are no church services in Mosul. The West comes up with one solution by granting visas to a few hundred people. What about a few hundred thousand?” If Iraq devolves into three regions–Sunnis, Shia and Kurds–there could be a fourth for minorities. “Iraq is a forced marriage between Sunni, Shia, Kurds and Christians, and it failed,” Youkhana said. “Even I, as a priest, favor divorce.”

Tarek Mitri, a former Lebanese minister and a former special representative to the U.N. secretary general for Libya, says that his impression in speaking to officials in the White House “is that Obama is in a withdrawal mood. He thinks that he was elected to withdraw from Afghanistan and Iraq and to make a deal with Iran. If this is the mood, then we shouldn’t expect much or ask much from the Americans.” Baskey, of the National Security Council, counters that “rather than withdrawing, the president and this administration have, in fact, remained deeply engaged, building and leading a coalition of some 60 nations to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL.”

The last time Rana, one of the women taken by ISIS from Qaraqosh, was able to speak to her family by phone was in September. She told them what had befallen Rita and Christina. Rita had been given as a slave to a powerful member of ISIS; Christina was given to a family to be raised as a Muslim.

Rana said little about her own circumstances, and her family didn’t ask. To be honest, they weren’t sure they wanted to know what ISIS had done to her.

For months now, the phone Rana used has been switched off. “There’s word they’re still alive,” Rabee Mano, 36, a refugee from Qaraqosh who runs an underground railroad out of the Islamic State, told me one recent evening over beer and kebabs. “She’s been ‘married’ to a powerful guy in ISIS,” he added.

How speaking up can save lives

BBC, 26 July 2015

Bosses in all fields can make mistakes. And while junior staff may always feel uncomfortable pointing them out, in some areas failing to do so could cost lives.

Aviation and medicine are two professions where the hierarchy that exists can make it particularly difficult for those lower down the pecking order to speak out.

One of the ways airlines are trying to reduce potentially fatal errors occurring is to use psychological techniques to break down that hierarchical structure and encourage people at all levels to highlight if something is about to go wrong–and medicine is starting to follow suit.

The aviation industry has embraced what’s known as a “just” culture, where reporting errors is encouraged to prevent mistakes turning into tragedies.

This approach followed disasters like that in Tenerife where on 27 March 1977 when 583 people died after two planes collided on the ground and burst into flames.

There was nothing technically wrong with either plane, and the main reason behind the crash was found to be the “authority gradient” in the cockpit of one plane.

The captain had overruled the co-pilot who thought they hadn’t been cleared for take-off.

Finding it hard to speak up in front of senior colleagues–even when it’s a matter of life or death–is something that can get in the way of openly pointing out errors.

Even with teams who work very closely, like the crew on an aeroplane, junior staff have been known to keep quiet in an emergency rather than question the actions of a pilot.

Surgical teams now hope to learn from years of research in aviation psychology which have made crashes a rarity.

Matt Lindley flies jumbo jets and trains doctors in safety. He recalls a case where a surgeon was preparing to operate on a child’s hand.

A junior member of staff noticed they were about to operate on the wrong hand–but her fears were dismissed. She tried again.

He said: “It’s quite unusual, a lot of people just back down after the first time you’re not acknowledged. She was told quite bluntly to be quiet.”

The team finally realised they’d operated on the wrong hand about 10 minutes into the procedure. Afterwards the junior doctor said she felt guilty–but also that she didn’t have the skills to make herself heard.

Mr Lindley says she should have been assertive–and used certain “trigger words”.

“I am concerned. I am uncomfortable. This is unsafe. Or we need to stop. And I think no matter what position you are in the pecking order, to ignore those four trigger words would be very very difficult.”

Most doctors say they’ve had a “light bulb moment” when they finish the course that he runs on these techniques.

“Many say: why am I doing this course when I’ve been a doctor for 25 years–I should have done this on day one!”

In 2012/2013 in England there were nearly 300 “never events”–incidents which can cause serious harm or death and are wholly preventable.

Measures do exist. The WHO’s Operating Checklist provides prompts at each stage of an operation for staff to carry out important checks–including basic checks like asking a patient to confirm their date of birth.

Rhona Flin, professor of applied psychology at Aberdeen University, has spent years analysing how human error can lead to disaster.

She says: “People often think their own industries are very different. Actually if you’re a psychologist who’s worked in different industrial settings it all looks pretty much the same to me.

“They’re all humans working in these technical environments. They’re affected by the same kind of emotions and social factors.”

Prof Flin says deference to authority can get in the way of open, honest reporting of errors and that at the time of the Tenerife disaster psychologists who observed crews training in flight simulators were alarmed by what they saw.

“Captains were briefed in advance to take some bad decisions or feign incapacity–to measure how long it would take for co-pilots would take to speak up. One psychologist monitoring their responses commented ‘Co-pilots would rather die than contradict a captain’.”

Mr Frank Cross is a vascular surgeon who works in London. He remembers vividly a mistake he made 30 years ago–leaving a swab behind in a patient’s body during an operation on her bowel.

When the patient came back complaining of a lump in her abdomen a few months later the swab was detected and removed.

He says it’s always better to own up, “You need to be open and honest if you make a mistake, and show that you are sorry.”

Divine Healing: A Touch of Grace

Link
By P. Amsterdam

Audio length: 12:20
Download Audio (11.3MB)

When giving the disciples the Great Commission to go into all the world and preach the Gospel, Jesus also said that these signs will follow those who believe: “They will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.”1 Throughout the Gospels, there are numerous examples of Jesus using touch in healing.

Jesus stretched out His hand and touched him, saying, “I will; be clean.” And immediately his leprosy was cleansed.2

Jesus in pity touched their eyes, and immediately they recovered their sight and followed Him.3

Now when the sun was setting, all those who had any who were sick with various diseases brought them to Him, and He laid his hands on every one of them and healed them.4

The apostles also used touch in their healing of others.

[Peter] took him by the right hand and raised him up, and immediately his feet and ankles were made strong.5

It happened that the father of Publius lay sick with fever and dysentery. And Paul visited him and prayed, and putting his hands on him healed him.6

Often people would touch Jesus and be healed.

When the men of that place recognized Him, they sent around to all that region and brought to Him all who were sick and implored Him that they might only touch the fringe of His garment. And as many as touched it were made well.7

All the crowd sought to touch Him, for power came out from Him and healed them all.8

Another example we can follow is using oil for anointing when we pray.

Is anyone among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith will save the one who is sick, and the Lord will raise him up.9

Sometimes when Jesus would heal, He would instruct the person to take some sort of action.

Then He said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” And the man stretched it out, and it was restored, healthy like the other.10

Jesus said to him, “Go your way; your faith has made you well.” And immediately he recovered his sight.11


The greatest of these is love

In addition to healing being a platform for sharing the Gospel, one of the main motivations for praying for people is compassion. Jesus had compassion and sympathy for the suffering of others, and He did something about it.

When He went ashore He saw a great crowd, and He had compassion on them and healed their sick.12

As He drew near to the gate of the town, behold, a man who had died was being carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow, and a considerable crowd from the town was with her. And when the Lord saw her, He had compassion on her and said to her, “Do not weep.” Then He came up and touched the bier, and the bearers stood still. And He said, “Young man, I say to you, arise.”13

A leper came to Jesus, beseeching Him and falling on his knees before Him, and saying, “If You are willing, You can make me clean.” Moved with compassion, Jesus stretched out His hand and touched him, and said to him, “I am willing; be cleansed.” Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed.14

Compassion can be seen as love in action. Jesus leaving the halls of heaven to live among us was a manifestation of God’s love for mankind. God is compassionate. Jesus reflected the compassion and love of God through His actions. We are filled with the Holy Spirit, meaning the Spirit of God dwells within us, and thus we too should be moved to action by compassion and love.

The Holy Spirit, who dwells in us, has made available spiritual gifts, one of which is healing. The apostle Paul wrote about the gifts of the Holy Spirit in 1 Corinthians 12. He states:

Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as He wills.15

After speaking about these gifts, he says:

I will show you a still more excellent way. If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.16

Paul strongly makes the point that if we have the gifts of the Spirit and can do all kinds of wonderful things because of these gifts, we must do them in love, as without love we are nothing.

No matter what your theology or methodology regarding healing, ministering to people must be done with love—to put yourself in the position of the sick person, or those grieving their loss, and act in a loving manner by showing sympathy. Love is the key when working with the infirm and with their loved ones.


When God doesn’t seem to answer our prayers for healing

While it’s a good thing to stand on God’s Word, to know that God has promised to, and does, answer prayer, I think it’s important to face certain truths—such as that not every prayer is answered in the manner we expect, and that sometimes God chooses not to answer immediately or in a way that we see it as His answer. God is greater than we are, and while we should claim His Word and stand on it and trust Him thoroughly, we need to understand that His ways are higher than ours and that He, in His infinite love and wisdom, may do or allow things in our lives or those of others that we don’t understand.

To demand that God answer every prayer for healing in a way that we expect, and, if that prayer is not answered, or is answered differently than we would have hoped, to put the blame on someone, in my opinion takes away from God’s power, from His sovereignty. It’s saying that we know better than God. God has more dimensions than we do. He knows so much more than we do—He knows supremely better than we do what’s best for each individual.

I believe that God heals people who are prayed for. Sometimes He heals instantaneously, sometimes progressively. Some He heals in this lifetime, and some He heals eternally through taking them home to Him. Whether God heals someone in this lifetime or in eternity, He is compassionate and loving. I believe it’s best to follow His Word by praying for the sick in obedience to His commands, trusting that as you pray, God will answer, and then leave the way He answers in His hands, and not try to place blame on someone—yourself or others—if a healing doesn’t take place every time.

At the same time, we also need to remember that there are many promises of healing in God’s Word; that Jesus, the apostles, many believers in the early church and throughout Christian history, including nowadays, have used healing in their witness, as well as for one another. They have prayed for the sick, and people were supernaturally healed.

As Christians, we’ve all been given the power to pray for the sick, as evidenced by the words of Jesus, His commands to His disciples to pray for the sick, His personal example, and the example of the early disciples. It takes faith to step out and pray for others, especially in a situation where you don’t know the person. It may be awkward, it could be embarrassing, but in doing so, the opportunity is given to someone to be touched by God. Many people would be happy to have someone pray for their healing, whether they are believers or not. When we pray for someone’s healing, we provide an opening for His love and power to be manifested to an individual.

His Word is clear—healing is available! He’s given us as believers power to heal. He’s sent us as disciples to preach the Gospel and heal the sick. The Holy Spirit, who dwells within us, has made the gift of healing available to us. When we pray for the sick, they will be healed in accordance with God’s will. No matter what method we use, God’s Spirit can use us as vehicles for His healing if we will take the step to pray for others. What a wonderful gift! What an opportunity to make a difference in the lives of others! What a tremendous vehicle for showing someone the love of Jesus, God’s compassion!

We may not know all the theological ins and outs, we may not know every method available, we may not completely understand why some people are healed and others aren’t, but what we do know is that the power of healing is available to us, as Christians, to help in ministering to others and leading them to salvation.

May God’s love and compassion motivate us to use all the means at our disposal, including the power of healing, to fulfill our mission of bringing Jesus into the lives of others.

Originally published April 2012. Adapted and republished April 2014.
Read by Simon Peterson.


1 Mark 16:15–18 ESV.

2 Matthew 8:3 ESV.

3 Matthew 20:34 ESV.

4 Luke 4:40 ESV.

5 Acts 3:7 ESV.

6 Acts 28:8 ESV.

7 Matthew 14:35–36 ESV.

8 Luke 6:19 ESV.

9 James 5:14–15 ESV.

10 Matthew 12:13 ESV.

11 Mark 10:52 ESV.

12 Matthew 14:14 ESV.

13 Luke 7:12–14 ESV.

14 Mark 1:40–42 NAU.

15 1 Corinthians 12:4–11 ESV.

16 1 Corinthians 12:31–13:2 ESV.

Cura Divina: Um Toque da Graça de Deus

Link
P. Amsterdam

Ao dar aos discípulos a Grande Comissão de irem ao mundo e pregarem o Evangelho a toda criatura, Jesus também disse que estes sinais seguiriam aos que creram: “Porão as mãos sobre os enfermos e eles recuperarão”.[1] Os Evangelhos mostram diversos exemplos de Jesus usando o toque na cura.

E Jesus, estendendo a mão, tocou-o, dizendo: Quero; sê limpo. E logo ficou purificado da lepra.[2]

Então, Jesus, movido de íntima compaixão, tocou-lhes nos olhos, e logo viram; e eles o seguiram.[3]

E, ao por do sol, todos os que tinham enfermos de várias doenças lhos traziam; e, impondo as mãos sobre cada um deles, os curava.[4]

Os apóstolos também tocaram as pessoas ao orarem por sua cura.

E [Pedro] tomando-o pela mão direita, o levantou, e logo os seus pés e tornozelos se firmaram.[5]

Aconteceu estar de cama enfermo de febre e disenteria o pai de Públio, que Paulo foi ver, e, havendo orado, pôs as mãos sobre ele e o curou.[6]

Muitas vezes as pessoas eram curadas ao tocar Jesus.

E, quando os homens daquele lugar O conheceram, mandaram por todas aquelas terras em redor e trouxeram-Lhes todos os que estavam enfermos. E rogavam-Lhe que, ao menos, eles pudessem tocar a orla da Sua veste; e todos os que a tocavam ficavam sãos.[7]

E toda a multidão procurava tocar-Lhe, porque saía dEle virtude que curava todos.[8]

Outro exemplo que podemos seguir é usar um óleo para ungir as pessoas ao orar por elas.

Está alguém entre vós doente? Chame os presbíteros da igreja, e orem sobre ele, ungindo-o com azeite, em nome do Senhor. E a oração da fé salvará o doente, e o Senhor o levantará.[9]

Às vezes, ao curar, Jesus também pedia à pessoa que fizesse algo.

Então disse àquele homem: Estende a mão. E ele a estendeu, e ficou sã como a outra.[10]

E Jesus lhe disse: Vai, a tua fé te salvou. E logo ele viu.[11]


O maior destes é o amor

Além da cura ser uma plataforma para compartilhar o Evangelho, a compaixão é um dos maiores motivadores para se orar pelas pessoas. Jesus tinha compaixão. Ele Se solidarizava com os outros, e tomava uma atitude.

E Jesus, saindo, viu uma grande multidão e, possuído de íntima compaixão para com ela, curou os seus enfermos.[12]

E, quando chegou perto da porta da cidade, eis que levavam um defunto, filho único de sua mãe, que era viúva; e com ela ia uma grande multidão da cidade. E, vendo-a, o Senhor moveu-Se de íntima compaixão por ela e disse-lhe: Não chores. E, chegando-se, tocou o esquife (e os que o levavam pararam) e disse: Jovem, Eu te digo: Levanta-te.”[13]

E aproximou-se dEle um leproso, que, rogando-Lhe e pondo-se de joelhos diante dEle, Lhe dizia: Se queres, bem podes limpar-me. E Jesus, movido de grande compaixão, estendeu a mão, e tocou-o, e disse-lhe: Quero, sê limpo. E, tendo ele dito isso, logo a lepra desapareceu, e ficou limpo.[14]

Podemos traduzir compaixão como o amor sendo colocado em ação. O fato de Jesus ter deixado os átrios celestes para viver entre nós foi uma manifestação do amor de Deus pela humanidade. Deus é compassivo. Jesus refletiu tal compaixão e amor de Deus por meio de Suas ações. Nós estamos preenchidos com o Espírito Santo, o que significa que o Espírito de Deus habita em nós, portanto deveríamos nos sentir compelidos a agir por compaixão e amor.

O Espírito Santo, que habita em nós, disponibilizou-nos dons espirituais, um dos quais é cura. A respeito dos dons do Espírito Santo, o apóstolo Paulo disse em 1 Coríntios 12:

Ora, há diversidade de dons, mas o Espírito é o mesmo. E há diversidade de ministérios, mas o Senhor é o mesmo. E há diversidade de operações, mas é o mesmo Deus que opera tudo em todos. Mas a manifestação do Espírito é dada a cada um para o que for útil. Porque a um, pelo Espírito, é dada a palavra da sabedoria; e a outro, pelo mesmo Espírito, a palavra da ciência; e a outro, pelo mesmo Espírito, a fé; e a outro, pelo mesmo Espírito, os dons de curar; e a outro, a operação de maravilhas; e a outro, a profecia; e a outro, o dom de discernir os espíritos; e a outro, a variedade de línguas; e a outro, a interpretação das línguas. Mas um só e o mesmo Espírito opera todas essas coisas, repartindo particularmente a cada um como quer.[15]

Depois de relacionar esses dons, ele diz:

E eu vos mostrarei um caminho ainda mais excelente. Ainda que eu falasse as línguas dos homens e dos anjos e não tivesse amor, seria como o metal que soa ou como o sino que tine. E ainda que tivesse o dom de profecia, e conhecesse todos os mistérios e toda a ciência, e ainda que tivesse toda a fé, de maneira tal que transportasse os montes, e não tivesse amor, nada seria.[16]

Paulo destaca com firmeza que, se temos os dons do Espírito que nos capacita a tantas obras maravilhosas, devemos fazê-las em amor, pois sem amor, nada somos.

Não importa a teologia ou metodologia usadas para a cura, deve-se ministrar para as pessoas em amor. Devemos nos colocar no lugar da pessoa doente, ou dos que perderam o seu amado, e agir com amor e sermos solidários. O segredo é ter amor quando se relaciona com pessoas enfermas e seus amados.


Quando Deus não aprece responder nossas orações por cura

Se por um lado é bom firmar-se na Palavra de Deus, sabendo que Ele prometeu atender às orações e o faz, por outro, é importante encarar certas verdades. Uma delas é que nem todas as orações são respondidas como esperamos. Às vezes Deus prefere não atender imediatamente ou da maneira que achamos que Ele deveria. Deus é muito maior do que nós. Devemos clamar e nos firmar na Sua Palavra, confiando em Jesus a cada passo, mas também devemos entender que os Seus caminhos são mais altos do que os nossos, e que Ele, no Seu infinito amor e sabedoria, talvez permita que aconteçam coisas na nossa vida ou de outros que nós não entendemos.

Exigir que Deus atenda a cada oração por cura como desejamos, ou que, caso não atenda, ou o faça de uma maneira diferente do que esperávamos, devemos culpar alguém, na minha opinião é minimizar o poder e a soberania de Deus. É o mesmo que dizer que sabemos mais do que Deus. Mas Ele age em dimensões diferentes das nossas; tem um conhecimento superior, e Ele, mais do que ninguém, sabe o que é melhor para cada pessoa.

Eu acredito que Deus cura as pessoas por quem se ora. Às vezes a cura é imediata, outras vezes, paulatina. Algumas pessoas Ele cura nesta vida, outras para a eternidade, levando-as para o Céu. Quer Deus cure a pessoa nesta vida, quer na eternidade, Ele é compassivo e amoroso. Acredito que o melhor é seguir a Sua Palavra e orar pelos doentes, obedecendo aos Seus mandamentos, confiando que, conforme orar, Ele atenderá. Depois disso, deixe Deus escolher como vai atender, e não culpe os outros, a si mesmo ou outros, caso a pessoa não sare.

Ao mesmo tempo, também devemos nos lembrar que a Palavra de Deus contém muitas promessas que Jesus, os apóstolos, muitos crentes na época da igreja primitiva e na história do Cristianismo, inclusive hoje em dia, têm usado a cura no seu testemunho, e também para ajudarem-se mutuamente. Os cristãos têm orado pelos doentes e as pessoas têm sarado de maneira sobrenatural.

As palavras de Jesus deixam evidente que cada cristão recebeu o poder de orar pelos doentes. Ele próprio deu esse exemplo e recomendou aos discípulos e primeiros seguidores que orassem pelos doentes. É preciso fé para orar pelas pessoas, principalmente quando estamos testemunhando e não conhecemos a pessoa. Podemos ficar constrangidos ou sem graça, mas se orarmos, estaremos dando a alguém a oportunidade de receber um toque divino. Muita gente, crente ou não crente, ficaria feliz se alguém orasse por sua cura. Quando oramos pela cura de alguém, criamos um espaço para o amor e o poder de Deus se manifestarem em favor da pessoa.

A Palavra de Deus deixa bem claro que é possível ser curado! Ele deu aos crentes o poder para curar. Enviou-nos como discípulos a pregar o Evangelho e curar os enfermos. O Espírito Santo, que habita em nós, colocou o dom da cura ao nosso dispor. Ao orarmos por um doente, ele será curado de acordo com a vontade de Deus. Não importa o método escolhido, o Espírito de Deus pode nos usar como instrumentos para a cura se dermos o primeiro passo de orar pelas pessoas. Que dom fabuloso! Que oportunidade de fazer a diferença na vida das pessoas! Que ferramenta mais incrível para mostrar a alguém o amor de Jesus e Sua compaixão!

Talvez não conheçamos todos os detalhes teológicos ou métodos disponíveis. Pode ser que não entendamos completamente por que algumas pessoas são curadas e outras não. Mas sabemos que o poder de curar está disponível a todo cristão para nos ajudar a ministrar e guiar as pessoas à salvação.

Que o amor e a compaixão de Deus nos motivem a usar todos os meios possíveis, inclusive o poder da cura, para cumprirmos a nossa missão de levar Jesus às pessoas.

Publicado originalmente em abril 2012. Adaptado e republicado em abril 2014. Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli. Revisão Denise Oliveira.


[1] Marcos 16:15–18.

[2] Mateus 8:3.

[3] Mateus 20:34.

[4] Lucas 4:40.

[5] Atos 3:7.

[6] Atos 28:8.

[7] Mateus 14:35–36.

[8] Lucas 6:19.

[9] Tiago 5:14–15.

[10] Mateus 12:13.

[11] Marcos 10:52.

[12] Mateus 14:14.

[13] Lucas 7:12–14.

[14] Marcos 1:40–42.

[15] 1 Coríntios 12:4–11.

[16] 1 Coríntios 12:31–13:2.

No Princípio Era a Palavra

Link
Compilação

O Evangelho de João é o Evangelho no qual buscar o plano da salvação, é onde encontramos uma explicação detalhada do que se trata a salvação, e da razão por que Jesus veio à terra. O Evangelho de João foi escrito por aquele que provavelmente era o mais jovem de todos os discípulos, de quem se diz, “o discípulo que Jesus amava.”[1]

A maioria dos peritos, teólogos e historiadores basicamente concorda que ele era provavelmente o mais jovem e talvez até fosse adolescente. Contudo, ele entendeu o plano da salvação e a razão de Jesus ter vindo. Não apenas para cumprir todas as profecias sobre o Messias, nem mesmo para ser o Messias naquela época, de certo modo. João explicou claramente, através do poder do Espírito Santo, o significado de Jesus e quem Ele realmente era.

Quem é que João diz que Jesus era? Ele era a Palavra. É a primeira coisa que João diz: “No princípio era aquele que é a Palavra. Ele estava com Deus, e era Deus. Ela estava com Deus no princípio. Todas as coisas foram feitas por intermédio dele; sem ele, nada do que existe teria sido feito.”[2]

Jesus foi mais que tudo a Palavra de Deus. O que é uma “palavra”? O texto grego usa o vocábulo “logos,” que significa “palavra,” mas tem um significado muito profundo. “Logos” é um tipo de palavra que significa uma expressão, ou até uma manifestação de algo. Portanto, Jesus é a expressão de Deus.

Deus estava tentando comunicar o Seu amor através de Jesus, fazendo de Jesus uma expressão do amor de Deus. Deus queria mostrar ao mundo o Seu amor. Você não pode ver amor, não consegue ver Deus, de modo que Ele enviou a Sua Palavra. Ele o disse em Jesus! Ele o expressou em Jesus. Ele comunicou Seu amor em Jesus!

A palavra grega “logos” é muito profunda, e significa uma expressão verdadeira e genuína, algo quase tangível; muito expressivo e real, e comunica com tamanha eficácia e significado! Jesus foi a expressão do amor de Deus. Ele era o significado do amor de Deus. Era a comunicação do amor de Deus. Ele expressava o amor de Deus. Ele mostrava o amor de Deus. Ele simbolizava o amor de Deus. Ele manifestava o amor de Deus.

João parece ter realmente captado isso e entendido a profundidade espiritual do amor de Deus e Sua salvação e o que Jesus realmente significava para o mundo inteiro, não apenas os judeus. João captou o significado mais profundo e grandioso de Jesus, e só pode ter sido obra do Espírito Santo. É maravilhoso ele demonstrar tamanha profundidade sendo que era o mais jovem de todos. Ele teve que depender do Espírito Santo para compreender o significado e transmitir que Jesus era a Palavra de Deus, a expressão de Deus, o amor de Deus, assim como o Filho de Deus.—David Brandt Berg

A expressão de Deus

Em Filipenses 2:6–8, Paulo menciona que Jesus é igual a Deus. Ele declara “sendo em forma de Deus,” mas que Ele não sentia a necessidade de se agarrar ou manter essa igualdade de natureza/forma. Em vez disso, por amor a nós, Ele “esvaziou-Se a Si mesmo” (literalmente deixou Seus privilégios de lado), assumindo a forma de um servo. “Humilhou-Se a Si mesmo sendo obediente, e obediente até à morte, e morte de cruz.” Colossenses 2:9 fala de Jesus e diz, “Porque nEle (Cristo) habita corporalmente toda a plenitude da divindade.”

Relacionado a isso está o ensinamento de que Jesus é a própria imagem ou expressão de Deus. João 1:1 refere-se a Jesus como a Palavra. Em grego, Palavra procede de logos, que significa “pensamento” ou “expressão.” Em Colossenses 1:15, diz que Cristo é “a imagem do Deus invisível.” 2 Coríntios 4:4 também diz que Cristo “ é a imagem de Deus.” Hebreus 1:3 diz que Cristo é “o resplendor da Sua glória, e a expressa imagem da Sua pessoa.”—Bob Williams

O Logos

Deus é o criador de todas as coisas, é eterno e auto existente. Por isso, para Jesus ser Deus, tem que ser eterno e também ter existido antes de todas as coisas, além de ter participado da criação de tudo o que existe. Segundo os primeiros três versículos do Evangelho de João:

No princípio era o Verbo, e o Verbo estava com Deus, e o Verbo era Deus. Ele estava no princípio com Deus. Todas as coisas foram feitas por meio dEle, e sem Ele nada do que foi feito se fez.

Falando do Deus Filho antes de vir à Terra, João se referiu a Ele como a Palavra, não como Jesus. Estes versículos mostram que a Palavra/Jesus participou da criação, “Todas as coisas foram feitas por meio dEle.” No original em grego, o termo usado por João e traduzido por Palavra era Logos, também usado anteriormente no século VI a.C. pelo filósofo grego Heráclito no sentido de razão divina ou plano que coordena um universo em constante mudança. Sendo assim, para quem falava grego naquela época, Logos significava razão, um termo que os ajudava a entender o sentido dos versículos, por exemplo em “no princípio era a razão ou a mente de Deus. Dessa forma eles entendiam que antes da criação o logos existia na eternidade junto com Deus. Portanto, o Logos, a Palavra, o Deus Filho, existia antes de qualquer coisa ter sido criada, inclusive antes do tempo, espaço ou energia.

Como Atanásio, um dos pais da igreja primitiva escreveu, “O Logos existe desde sempre.” Ele é eterno. O Logos, Deus Filho, estava junto com Deus, o Pai, e era Deus.

João 1:14 continua:

O Verbo se fez carne, e habitou entre nós. Vimos a sua glória, a glória como do unigênito do Pai, cheio de graça e de verdade.

João diz claramente que o Logos, a Palavra, Deus Filho, Se tornou carne e viveu na terra, ou seja, o Deus Filho viveu como um ser humano. Isso significa que Ele, um ser eterno e espiritual, assumiu a forma humana no tempo e no espaço. Isso só poderia acontecer se Deus encarnasse mesmo — exatamente o que aconteceu quando Jesus de Nazaré nasceu. Ele Se tornou o Deus homem, Deus na carne, que habitou entre nós.—Peter Amsterdam

Cheio de graça e verdade

A verdade não é simplesmente algo passivo que interceptamos, como o resultado de um episódio do CSI[3] que nos deixa inteiramente certos “do que realmente aconteceu.” A verdade com certeza tem este elemento de definição; de estar certo, o Logos que se tornou carne é o relato definitivo de Deus sobre a verdade. Mas isso é algo muito mais profundo e mais dimensional do que os fatos frios e indiferentes, como evidenciados mais adiante na descrição de João do Cristo como “cheio de graça e de verdade” em si mesmo. A verdade tem uma qualidade correspondente, interativa e participativa que não toma mais de uma hora para ser absorvida e melhor entendida ao engajar sua profundidade e personalidade em um mundo de alternativas impessoais e simplistas. Pois, se a verdade é pessoal—como o é, uma Pessoa—é preciso toda uma vida de engajamento com aquele que é a verdade e o Espírito que nos leva ativamente à descoberta desta verdade.

Não resta dúvidas que o mistério da religião cristã é enorme—um mistério não no sentido do CSI, mas um mistério revelado. A descrição que Paulo faz de Jesus é cheia de verdades inescrutáveis com provas irrefutáveis: “Deus se manifestou em carne, foi justificado no Espírito, visto dos anjos, pregado aos gentios, crido no mundo, recebido acima na glória.”[4] Evidências da altura e da profundidade dessa verdade misteriosa podem verdadeiramente ser recebidas como impressões factuais e definitivas. De modo que elas são pistas que apontam para uma Pessoa multidimensional, inexaurível, cheia de graça e verdade.—Jill Carattini

Publicado no Âncora em junho de 2015.


[1] João 13:23; 19:26; 20:2; 21:7, 20.

[2] João 1:1–3, NVI.

[3] CSI: Crime Scene Investigation—um seriado da televisão americana.

[4] 1 Timóteo 3:16.

Faith Is the Starting Point

Link
By Maria Fontaine

Audio length: 10:52
Download Audio (9.9MB)

“This is the victory that overcomes the world, even your faith.” “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”—1 John 5:4, Hebrews 11:1

Faith is the password, the foundation of power, anointing, and victory. Faith is the starting point in whatever we feel called to do for the Lord. We need faith to obey God’s Word, faith to step out and try new and different things, faith that the Lord can use us in new ways, faith that we can facilitate the gospel being “preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations.”1

Faith is vital. It’s what will enable us to walk through open doors, take advantage of golden opportunities, and follow God wherever He leads. It’s what will help us to say yes to Jesus—yes to taking a risk, yes to trying a new method in our witness, yes to taking the time to minister to that person He puts in our path, yes to not giving up on some needy soul, yes to whatever His will may be for each of us.

To get results, we need faith! Faith is what will drive us, help us to do the impossible, and to put action behind our beliefs and visions, to persevere when things are tough. Faith will catapult us over obstacles.

Sometimes faith seems a little bit mysterious, but it’s actually not complicated.We don’t have to try so hard to dissect faith or understand it. We simply need to trust in that which we have good reason to believe is true, Jesus, who is the author and finisher of our faith—the one who honors our trusting Him and His guidance in our lives. Once we have come to that place of trust, then we can embark on that which the Lord leads us to do with complete confidence that He will honor our trust in Him and our acknowledging Him all along the way.

We live by faith and walk by faith and it’s our “title deed,” but faith is also manifested by action. It’s a “doing” word, because faith without works is dead.2 We don’t have to feellike we have faith, or think that we have great faith. If we just start doing the things the Lord leads us to do, we’ll realize that we possess this valuable treasure—and the more we use our faith and feed it, the stronger it will grow.


(Jesus:) Have you ever seen those sports interviews in which they’re interviewing an athlete after a victory or a game that they won, and they ask the victor what gave them the edge? What gave them the upper hand so that they were able to defeat their competitor? They often say that it was confidence, that they believed in themselves, they believed in their team, and they believed that they could win.

Faith is having confidence in Me. Faith is knowing that you can trust Me completely. Faith knows that no matter what comes your way, or what you face, I will bring you through it; I will work things together for your good, regardless of the circumstances.

Faith isn’t something you just “have” naturally. Faith grows, it’s built over time. The more your faith is tested and the more you turn to Me and My Word, the more your faith will grow.

I can strengthen your faith when you are in faith-inducing situations. Such challenges are trying at the time, but result in greater faith if you take a stand of faith and watch Me come through for you.


Tips on how to strengthen your faith and put it into action

Be willing to take steps, especially if they stretch your faith.

*

Manifest your faith by taking initiative, by thinking outside of the box and breaking out of your mold or comfort zone.

*

Let your mind stretch. Your faith is almost always limited by your mind and what you are willing to accept as possible. Push the barriers back. Explore the uncharted seas.

*

Don’t let past failures, or fear of future failures, hold you back.

*

Settle on a plan to put your faith into action, even if it’s a plan that you know will stretch you, or that you may not feel fully ready for. Tossing around a variety of ideas is a good first step, but there comes a point where you have to look at the valid ones and select your course of action. Once you have your course of action, determine a first step. So many good ideas go nowhere because the first step isn’t taken.

*

Don’t stop with a good first step; have a projection you’re working with that will get you to your goal.

*

It’s likely that not every element of your projection will work out as planned. When that happens, realign your projection and then keep moving forward.

*

The basic principle of all faith and action is doing! Get started. Once you know the Lord’s will for you, get to it.

*

Be willing to do the hard work that comes with putting your faith into action. Faith is the underlying belief that a plan is workable and achievable. But any worthwhile venture requires elbow grease, slogging it out at times, and perseverance to see it through, and sometimes even to simply get it off the ground.

*

Invest time in proving your faith once you know something is God’s will. Don’t fizzle out at the first sign of difficulty. Don’t give up too soon. Faith takes the challenges, both expected and unexpected, as they come, and tackles them. It doesn’t just will them away; it devises a plan for the solution and then puts it into effect.

*

Be positive, but also be realistic. Putting faith into action does not mean you’re unrealistic. It means that while you’re projecting into the future and aiming toward your vision, you are also translating what that means into practical, everyday steps that you can take with God’s help.

*

Faith requires a will to work. Faith doesn’t lazily wait for a bolt of lightning from the sky before acting. The “bolt” may be on its way, but faith won’t be idle during that time; faith will be hard at work, both trusting the Lord and also actively doing what you can.

*

Don’t feel bad about having to change your plans a little along the way. Faith is not afraid to adapt plans, because of your confidence that God is in control. Change is a fellow laborer alongside faith.

Don’t be stuck in a rut as to where your faith can take you. Expect that it can take you great distances, and then get busy proving that.

*

Expect some setbacks, but don’t let them hold you back. Learn to work around, over, under, or even through them if need be. Setbacks often bring to light elements that were not fully accounted for in your initial plan, and as a result they can help your plan to be more successful in the long run. Faith will give you the right outlook on setbacks and help you take advantage of them as stepping stones to success.

*

Celebrate the victories along the way, even the little ones. Even celebrate the unexpected problems you had to resolve that then resulted in victory.

*

Ask for prayer from others if you feel your faith is under attack.

*

Be faithful to spend time in God’s Word, which helps to strengthen your faith and increase your vision.

*

Listen to faith-building stories and testimonies from others. Be around people with faith.

*

Keep a log of answered prayers. It’s a great faith booster and also an excellent aid in your times of praise and worship.

*

The muscle of faith doesn’t grow or get stronger by staying within your comfort zone. Once you’ve gotten one step down, then take the next one; just like an athlete who trains with heavier weights once he’s mastered a certain level. Your faith grows and gets stronger by continuing to exercise your faith.


(Jesus:) Faith is at its finest when it’s been through the wringer and still comes out with a grin. That’s the sign of durable faith. Do your part to strengthen your faith and nourish it through your times with Me and My Word.

Faith has a work element to it as well. Faith is what transfers something from a nice thought to a world-changing action. There’s nothing laid back about having faith; you need to be willing to get off your rump, roll up your sleeves, and work hard.

Your work for Me is a work of My Spirit, but it’s equally a work in the physical realm. Faith is what will take you from a mere plan to reality. Faith is not complete without action; it’s a package deal.

Faith will rock your world, because not only will you hope for great things, you will set about to take action by faith. Faith will be the substance of the things you hope for and the evidence of them even while they are yet unseen.3

Originally published August 2008. Adapted and republished July 2015.
Read by Debra Lee.



1 Matthew 24:14.


2 James 2:26.


3 Hebrews 11:1.

On Earth As It Is in Heaven: Pushing Back the Darkness

By Dena Dyer

“Wow,” my oldest said. “That was incredible.”

“I know,” I replied. Tears streamed down my face, and I took a few deep breaths to collect myself.

The two of us had just finished watching the final scene of the 2012 movie, Les Miserablés, based on the stage musical of the same name. I’d seen the live production a half-dozen times, but each time the closing number made me cry.

After the deeply flawed, deeply faithful characters strive for freedom from tyranny and injustice, both those who died and those who lived sing together of heaven in a stirring finale, “Can You Hear the People Sing?”

Their voices raised along with their flags, the now-unified cast asks:

Do you hear the people sing
Lost in the valley of the night?
It is a music of a people
Who are climbing to the light …
They will live again in freedom
In the garden of the Lord.
They will walk behind the plough-share,
They will put away the sword.
The chain will be broken
And all men will have their reward.

The song touches the place inside me that longs for earth and heaven to meet. My spirit groans to see Satan thrown down, once and for all.

But when I say, “Lord, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven,” what does that really mean? How can I live kingdom-minded on this fragile soil while continuing to pray—and work—for spiritual fruits such as peace and love?

As children of the light, you and I are meant to shine so brightly that darkness is pushed back, even a tiny bit. When we do that, heaven kisses earth.
We are all called

Whether we work as mothers or movers, contractors or cooks, when we serve diligently in the place God has set us, we are freedom fighters. We plant seeds of hope with each action, interaction, and reaction. “Faith can … be the spiritual energy that enables the transformations for which our world so desperately hungers,” says Jim Wallis in Faith Works: How to Live Your Beliefs and Ignite Positive Social Change.

We are part of a royal priesthood, and our sphere of influence is our congregation. With the Spirit’s help, you and I can bring God’s kingdom to earth in a myriad of ways. We can create a redemptive piece of art, perform thankless tasks with a joyful spirit, and respond to insults or slights with forgiveness.

In his book Ordinary: Sustainable Faith in a Radical, Restless World, Michael Horton writes:

In all sorts of ways we’re not even aware of, the kingdom is growing and our neighbors are being served. There may be a quiet reference in the coffee room that provokes a coworker weeks later to ask a question about life and death … You made lunch for the kids and got them to school on time. You worked well with your hands to supply neighbors with what they need … Now we are free to do the little things that matter, without anxiety about how it all turns out in the end.
Not up to us

Remember what Jesus said to Peter, the ready-fire-aim disciple with a habit of putting his foot squarely in his mouth? He announced: “I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”1

It’s a paradox: we are called to work for restoration and renewal, pray for transformation, and put feet to our faith. However, in the end, we trust that God will do the work through, for, and in us.

It’s important to remember this when we engage in freeing modern-day slaves, feeding the hungry, and clothing the poor. The sheer number of people living in all sorts of captivity is overwhelming. “Compassion fatigue” is a common ailment affecting those who serve those on life’s margins.

While we are seeking the kingdom and making God’s priorities ours, we must rest in the fact that God is the one who changes people and institutions. His spirit prompts revival. His grace brings salvation. We don’t have to fear that we’ll mess things up.

As Paul wrote to the Roman church, “It does not, therefore, depend on human desire or effort, but on God’s mercy.”2

Thank heaven!

From http://www.thehighcalling.org/work/earth-it-heaven-pushing-back-darkness, © 2001 - 2011 H. E. Butt Foundation. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission from Laity Lodge and TheHighCalling.org. Article by Dena Dyer.

Monday, July 27, 2015

THE POWER of THE BRAIN AND QUANTUM BIOLOGY

Link
Written by Dr. Caroline Leaf

From the pioneers of the development of the computer such as Alan Turin [1] to Hollywood films[2], artificial intelligence in medicine [3], contests between computers and humans [4] and the more recent singularity movement led by Ray Kurzweil [5], the notion that artificial intelligence would soon become more powerful than the human brain has captured the public imagination. Since Hal the computer in ‘2001, A Space Odyssey’ [6] we have imagined robots and computers as eventually becoming sentient beings- a logical conclusion of a materialist mindset that asserts that the mind (soul) only emerges from complicated brain computation [7]. In contrast the Bible states that the soul was created when God breathed His Spirit into a human formed from physical dust (Genesis 2:7). Interestingly, recent scientific research is pointing to the fact that a world taken over by super-intelligent sentient robot beings is actually a total fantasy - the brain is much more powerful than we once thought by many orders of magnitude [8].

The position of the status quo has been that information is processed by weighted connections (synapses) or nodes [9]. Therefore it seemed it was possible to reproduce brain function using computer simulation. A human brain was estimated to operate at 10^9 bits per second at the synaptic level, however there is now evidence of information processing taking place at the microtubular level inside the cell [8]. Microtubules were once thought to be just cell scaffolding - now it is clear they form the nervous system of the cell. After all, single-celled animals which do not have synapses have been shown to have intelligence [10]. Dendrites, which are the branches of single nerve cells (neurons), are now been compared to mini-computers rather than binary switches, as once thought [11]. Taken together, therefore, a whole human brain can conceivably operate at 10^27 bits per second [8]. That is more processing power than all the computers in the world put together [8][12]. Therefore it is inconceivable that attempts to simulate the Human Brian, like the epic Billion Euro Human Brain Project [13], a progression of Henry Markram’s Blue Brain Project [14], will ultimately succeed. However such projects will yield and has already yielded useful information about brain structure and function that can be applied to medical informatics [15] as well as computer technology [16].

Additionally there is also evidence that the brain is operating at the quantum level in the microtubules [17]. Interestingly biological processes such as photosynthesis, bird navigation and olfaction (odor detection) have been shown to take advantage of quantum effects such as superposition as proposed by as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle [18]. It seems biological process are tapping into the ‘spooky’ (as described by Einstein [19] world of quantum entanglement, where information transfer is not limited time or location. A whole new discipline termed ‘Quantum Biology’ is emerging. It is therefore conceivable that more biological processes operate at a quantum level. The brain actually may be acting like a quantum computer at the microtubular level as proposed by Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose’s Orch-OR Theory [17]. In fact there is growing experimental evidence for this theory which is also implying that the brain is processing information using fractal resonance frequencies not just electrical action potentials- akin to songs within songs in an orchestral arrangement [20].

We are truly ‘fearfully and wonderfully made’ (Psalm 139:14). The above-mentioned research is showing that the brain is much more powerful, functioning at a more profound manner than was once thought. This surely points to the infinitely powerful and innovative Mind of The Creator, The God of the whole Universe described in the His Living Word, the Bible.

References 1. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012 Jul 28;370(1971):3273-6. The foundations of computation, physics and mentality: the Turing legacy. Cooper SB, Abramsky S. 2. ‘Blade Runner’ (1982), ‘The Terminator’ (1984), ‘The Matrix’ (1999), 'I, Robot’ (2004), ‘The Machine’ (2013), ‘Chappie’ (2015). 3. Ramesh AN, Kambhampati C, Monson JRT, Drew PJ. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2004;86(5):334-338. 4. Chess: Garry Kasparov vs Deep Blue (Computer) (1997), Jeopardy: Watson (Computer) vs Humans (2011) 5. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology- Sep 26, 2006 by Ray Kurzweil. 6. ‘2001, A Space Odyssey’ (1968) 7.The Emerging Mind: The BBC Reith Lectures 2003 – September 20, 2003 by Vilaynur Ramachandran 8. J Biol Phys. 2010 Jan;36(1):53-70. A critical assessment of the information processing capabilities of neuronal microtubules using coherent excitations. Craddock TJ, Tuszynski JA 9. Connectivism: Learning as Network-Creation, Learning Circuits, November 2005. 10. CELL INTELLIGENCE Guenter Albrecht-Buehler, Ph.D. Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago. Website-http://www.basic.northwestern.edu/g-buehler/FRAME.HTM 11. Spencer L. Smith, Ikuko T. Smith, Tiago Branco, Michael Häusser. Dendritic spikes enhance stimulus selectivity in cortical neurons in vivo. Nature, 2013 12. Ars Technica- World’s total CPU power: one human brain by John Timmer. http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/adding-up-the-worlds-storage-and-computation-capacities/ 13. The Human Brain Project- https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/ 14. The Blue Brain Project - http://bluebrain.epfl.ch/page-52063.html 15. Human Brain Project- Medical Informatics- https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/medical-informatics-platform 16. Human Brain Project- Neuromorphic Computing-https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/neuromorphic-computing-platform 17. Phys Life Rev. 2014 Mar;11(1):39-78. Consciousness in the universe: a review of the 'Orch OR' theory. Hameroff S, Penrose R. 18. Quantum Effects in Biology – September 22, 2014. by Masoud Mohseni ,Yasser Omar, Gregory S. Engel, Dr Martin B. Plenio. HFSP J. 2009 Dec;3(6):386-400. Quantum physics meets biology. Arndt M, Juffmann T, Vedral V. 19. Spooky Action at a Distance By Brian Greene 09.22.11 .NOVA http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/spooky-action-distance.html 20. Information 2014, 5(1), 28-100. Design and Construction of a Brain-Like Computer: A New Class of Frequency-Fractal Computing Using Wireless Communication in a Supramolecular Organic, Inorganic System. Subrata Ghosh, Krishna Aswani, Surabhi Singh, Satyajit Sahu, Daisuke Fujita and Anirban Bandyopadhyay

A Mideast Game of Thrones

By Patrick J. Buchanan, Creators Syndicate, July 21, 2015

As President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran is compared to Richard Nixon’s opening to China, Bibi Netanyahu must know how Chiang Kai-shek felt as he watched his old friend Nixon toasting Mao in Peking.

The Iran nuclear deal is not on the same geostrategic level. Yet both moves, seen as betrayals by old U.S. allies, were born of a cold assessment in Washington of a need to shift policy to reflect new threats and new opportunities.

Several events contributed to the U.S. move toward Tehran.

First was the stunning victory in June 2013 of President Hassan Rouhani, who rode to power on the votes of the Green Revolution that had sought unsuccessfully to oust Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009.

Rouhani then won the Ayatollah’s authorization to negotiate a cutting and curtailing of Iran’s nuclear program, in return for a U.S.-U.N. lifting of sanctions. As preventing an Iranian bomb had long been a U.S. objective, the Americans could not spurn such an offer.

Came then the Islamic State’s seizure of Raqqa in Syria, and Mosul and Anbar in Iraq. Viciously anti-Shiite as well as anti-American, ISIS made the U.S. and Iran de facto allies in preventing the fall of Baghdad.

But as U.S. and Iranian interests converged, those of the U.S. and its old allies–Saudi Arabia, Israel and Turkey–were diverging.

Turkey, as it sees Bashar Assad’s alliance with Iran as the greater threat, and fears anti-ISIS Kurds in Syria will carve out a second Kurdistan, has been abetting ISIS.

Saudi Arabia sees Shiite Iran as a geostrategic rival in the Gulf, allied with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Assad in Damascus, the Shiite regime in Iraq and the Houthis in Yemen. It also sees Iran as a subversive threat in Bahrain and the heavily Shiite oil fields of Saudi Arabia itself.

Indeed, Riyadh, with the Sunni challenge of ISIS rising, and the Shiite challenge of Iran growing, and its border states already on fire, does indeed face an existential threat. And, so, too, do the Gulf Arabs.

Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown in the Middle East today.

The Israelis, too, see Iran as their great enemy and indispensable pillar of Hezbollah. For Bibi, any U.S.-Iran rapprochement is a diplomatic disaster.

Which brings us to a fundamental question of the Middle East.

Is the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal and our de facto alliance against ISIS a temporary collaboration? Or is it the beginning of a detente between these ideological enemies of 35 years?

Is an historic “reversal of alliances” in the Mideast at hand?

Clearly the United States and Iran have overlapping interests.

Neither wants all-out war with the other. For the Americans, such a war would set the Gulf ablaze, halt the flow of oil, and cause a recession in the West. For Iran, war with the USA could see their country smashed and splintered like Saddam’s Iraq, and the loss of an historic opportunity to achieve hegemony in the Gulf.

Also, both Iran and the United States would like to see ISIS not only degraded and defeated, but annihilated. Both thus have a vested interest in preventing a collapse of either the Shiite regime in Baghdad or Assad’s regime in Syria.

And, thus, Syria is probably where the next collision is going to come between the United States and its old allies.

For Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Israel all want the Assad regime brought down to break up Iran’s Shiite Crescent and inflict a strategic defeat on Tehran. But the United States believes the fall of Assad means the rise of ISIS and al-Qaida, a massacre of Christians, and the coming to power of a Sunni terrorist state implacably hostile to us.

Look for the Saudis and Israelis, their agents and lobbies, their think tanks and op-ed writers, to begin beating the drums for the United States to bring down Assad, who has been “killing his own people.”

The case will be made that this is the way for America to rejoin its old allies, removing the principal obstacle to our getting together and going after ISIS. Once Assad is gone, the line is already being moved, then we can all go after ISIS. But, first, Assad.

What is wrong with this scenario?

A U.S. no-fly zone, for example, to stop Assad’s barrel bombs, would entail attacks on Syrian airfields and antiaircraft missiles and guns. These would be acts of war, which would put us into a de facto alliance with the al-Qaida Nusra Front and ISIS, and invite retaliations against Americans by Hezbollah in Beirut, and the Shiite militia in Baghdad.

Any U.S.-Iran rapprochement would be dead, and we will have been sucked into a war to achieve the strategic goals of allies that are in conflict with the national interests of the United States. And our interests come first.

Living in Switzerland ruined me for America and its lousy work culture

By Chantal Panozzo, Vox, July 21, 2015

I was halfway through a job interview when I realized I was wrinkling my nose. I couldn’t help myself. A full-time freelance position with a long commute, no benefits, and a quarter of my old pay was the best they could do? I couldn’t hide how I felt about that, and the 25-year-old conducting the interview noticed.

“Are you interested in permanent jobs instead?” she asked.

“I could consider a permanent job if it was part-time,” I said.

She looked at me like I was speaking a foreign language and went right back to her pitch: long commute, full-time, no benefits. No way, I thought. Who would want to do that? And then it hit me: Either I had become a completely privileged jerk or my own country was not as amazing as I had once thought it to be. This wasn’t an unusually bad offer: It was just American Reality.

Before I moved to Switzerland for almost a decade, American Reality was all I knew. I was living in a two-bedroom apartment making $30,000 a year in a job where I worked almost seven days a week with no overtime pay and received 10 days of paid time off a year.

In other words, for the hours worked, I was making minimum wage, if that. The glamour of this job was supposed to make up for the hours, but in reality, working every weekend is a ticket to burnout–not success.

My husband and I were so accustomed to American Reality that when he was offered an opportunity to work in Switzerland, we both thought about travel and adventure–not about improving our quality of life. It hadn’t occurred to us that we could improve our quality of life simply by moving.

But without realizing it, or even asking for it, a better life quality came to us. And this is why, now that I’m back, I’m angry that my own country isn’t providing more for its people. I will never regret living abroad. It taught me to understand another culture. And it taught me to see my own. But it also taught me something else–to lose touch with the American version of reality.

Here are seven ways living abroad made it hard to return to American life.

1) I had work-life balance. The Swiss work hard, but they have a strong work-life balance. According to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the average Swiss worker earned the equivalent of $91,574 a year in 2013, while the average American worker earned only $55,708. But the real story is that the average American had to work 219 hours more per year for this lesser salary.

Which brings us to lunch. In Switzerland, you don’t arrive to a meeting late, but you also don’t leave for your lunch break a second past noon. If it’s summer, jumping into the lake to swim with the swans is an acceptable way to spend your lunch hour. If you eat a sandwich at your desk, people will scold you. I learned this the hard way.

“Ugh,” said Tom, a Swiss art director I shared an office with at a Zurich ad agency. “It smells like someone ate their lunch in here.” He threw open the windows and fanned the air.

“They did. I ate a sandwich here,” I said.

Tom looked at me like I was crazy.

“No. Tomorrow you’re having a proper lunch. With me,” he said.

The next day, exactly at noon, we rode the funicular to a restaurant where we dined al fresco above Zurich. After lunch, we strolled down the hill. I felt guilty for being gone for an hour and a half. But no one had missed us at the office.

Lunchtime is sacred time in Switzerland. When I was on maternity leave, my husband came home for lunch to help me care for our daughter. This strengthened our marriage. Many families still reunite during weekdays over the lunch hour.

Weekends in Switzerland encourage leisure time, too. On Sundays, you can’t even shop–most stores are closed. You are semi-required to hike in the Alps with your family. It’s just what you do.

2) I had time and money. The Swiss have a culture of professional part-time work, and as a result, part-time jobs include every benefit of a full-time job, including vacation time and payment into two Swiss pension systems. Salaries for part-time work are set as a percentage of a professional full-time salary­-because unlike in the United States, part-time jobs are not viewed as necessarily unskilled jobs with their attendant lower pay.

During my Swiss career, I was employed by various companies from 25 percent to 100 percent. When I worked 60 percent, for example, I worked three days a week. A job that is 50 percent could mean the employee works five mornings a week or, as I once did, two and a half days a week. The freedom to choose the amount of work that was right for me at varying points of my life was wonderful and kept me engaged and happy.

Often, jobs in Switzerland are advertised with the percentage of work that is expected. Other times, you can negotiate what percentage you would like to work or request to go from working five days a week to four days a week, for example. There is normally little risk involved in asking.

One married couple I knew each worked 80 percent, which meant they each spent one day a week at home with their child, limiting the child’s time in day care to three days a week while continuing full professional lives for both of them. According to a recent article in the New York Times, “Why U.S. Women Are Leaving Jobs Behind,” 81 percent of women in Switzerland are in the workforce, versus 69 percent in the US. I believe attitudes toward professional part-time work–for both men and women–have a lot to do with this.

3) I had the support of an amazing unemployment system. About three years into my Swiss life, I lost my job. And I discovered that in Switzerland, being on unemployment meant you received 70 to 80 percent of your prior salary for 18 months. The Swiss government also paid for me to take German classes, and when I wasn’t looking for jobs, I could afford to write a book.

In the United States, on the other hand, unemployment benefits generally pay workers between 40 and 50 percent of their previous salary, and these benefits only last for six months on average. However, thanks to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009, some unemployed people now receive up to 99 weeks of benefits.

4) I witnessed what happens when countries impose wealth-based taxes. Compared with taxes in the United States, Swiss taxes are easy on the average worker. For example, a worker earning the average wage of $91,574 would pay only about 5 percent of that in Swiss federal income tax. Instead of taxing salaries at high percentages–a practice that puts most of the tax burden on the middle class, where most income comes from wages and not from capital gains–Switzerland immediately taxes dividends at a maximum of 35 percent and also has a wealth-based tax.

While the American tax system is supposed to be progressive–so the more you earn, the more taxes you pay–up to 39.6 percent tax for the highest income brackets, the superrich escape paying these kind of taxes because they aren’t making most of their money in wages.

For example, in 2010, Mitt Romney, whose total income was $21.6 million, paid only $3 million in taxes, or a tax rate of about 14 percent, which is amazing when you consider this is the same tax rate American families earning wages from about $16,750 to $68,000 paid in 2010.

The Swiss taxation method leaves money in the pocket of the average worker–and allows them to save accordingly. The average adult in Switzerland has a net worth of $513,000 according to the 2013 Credit Suisse Wealth Report. Average net worth among adults in the US is half that.

While I witnessed the benefits of the Swiss tax system for the average person, I did not benefit from them due to my American citizenship. Instead, I paid both Swiss tax and American tax while living in Switzerland. Unfortunately, the US is one of the only nations in the world where tax is citizen-based instead of resident-based. (China, in a new push to enforce tax law for citizens working abroad, is one of the others, along with Eritrea.)

5) I had lots of paid vacation time and was never made to feel guilty about taking it. At my former American job, I received 10 days of paid vacation per year, and each of those days came with a sizable portion of guilt if actually used. But in Switzerland, my husband’s company gave employees six weeks of vacation a year. Most of the Swiss companies I worked for gave four–the legal minimum is four. Moreover, everything shut down between Christmas and New Year’s, giving most employees like me another guaranteed week off.

People in Europe took vacation seriously. Once, when I only took 10 days for a trip to Spain, my colleagues chastised me for taking so little time off. I learned to take vacation chunks in two-week intervals. Well rested, I noticed that I felt more productive and creative when I returned to work. Recent American research confirms what I was feeling: Relaxing can make you more productive. So why don’t Americans embrace vacation time?

6) I never had to own a car. I’m currently cringing at the idea of being required to buy a car. A Honda dealer here in Chicago recently quoted me $18,000 for a 2012 Accord, and that seems like a lot of money–especially when you still need to pay for insurance, gasoline, and repairs. The price is even more daunting for someone who isn’t used to being required to pay for such a thing.

Not owning a car is financially freeing–and it saves the environment, too. In Switzerland, 21 percent of households do not own a car, versus 9.2 percent in the US.

The Swiss train connects to the bus that connects to the cable car to get you on the slopes in the middle of nowhere at the scheduled second. From Zurich, I could also take a high-speed train to Paris in three and a half hours. Now I can barely get from the western suburbs to the north side of Chicago in that amount of time–let alone have the option to do it carless. This means I’m turning down jobs instead of taking them. This isn’t good for the American economy or for me.

And let’s be clear: Living in a city suburb is no excuse for having bad transit options. I lived exactly the same distance from Zurich that I now live from Chicago (15 miles) but shared none of the public transport frustrations.

7) I had excellent health care when I gave birth–and then enjoyed a fully paid 14-week maternity leave. When I gave birth in Switzerland, I was encouraged to stay five days in the hospital. So I did. The $3,000 bill for the birth and hospital stay was paid in full by my Swiss insurance. As was the required midwife, who came to my apartment for five days after I came home from the hospital to check on both my health and my baby’s.

Had I been in the US for my delivery, the cost would have been much higher–and the quality of care arguably lower. The average price for a vaginal birth in the US is $30,000 and includes an average of less than a two-day hospital stay.

Swiss law also mandates a 14-week maternity leave at a minimum of 80 percent pay. I was lucky enough to receive 100 percent pay. Compare that with the US, where new mothers aren’t guaranteed any paid time off after giving birth. In Switzerland, it’s also common to choose how much work to return to after having a child. Since my Swiss job at the time had been full time, I chose to return at 60 percent.

Other American friends in Switzerland who gave birth also chose to return to their careers part time: My engineering manager friend chose 70 percent, and my lawyer friend chose 80 percent. We had great careers, we had balance, and we also had a Swiss government that paid a monthly child stipend whether we needed it or not. For Americans like me, Swiss Reality was privilege.

Finally, finally, after almost a decade abroad, my husband and I decided we needed to go home to see what home felt like, or if the United States even felt like home anymore. So we put our Swiss residence permits on hold for two years and went back to Chicago.

While I enjoy being close to family again, returning to the United States made me realize who I’ve become: someone who can’t believe companies aren’t required to pay into a pension fund beyond Social Security. Someone who is offended that most women in America don’t have the maternity benefits she had.

And someone who is mad that she must own a car for lack of efficient public transportation. Someone who, because of all of this, is still debating where she ultimately wants to call home.

Chantal Panozzo is the author of Swiss Life: 30 Things I Wish I’d Known. She has written about Switzerland and expat life for the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith