by Gary Allen, 1971
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
1. DON'T CONFUSE ME WITH FACTS
2. SOCIALISM — ROYAL ROAD
3. THE MONEY MANIPULATORS
4. BANKROLLING THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
5. ESTABLISHING THE ESTABLISHMENT
6. THE ROCKEFELLERS & THE REDS
7. PRESSURE FROM ABOVE & PRESSURE FROM BELOW
8. YOU ARE THE ANSWER
FOURTEEN SIGNPOSTS TO SLAVERY
WHAT WILL YOU DO?
MEMBERS OF THE CFR NOMINATED
& APPOINTED BY PRESIDENT NIXON TO GOVERNMENT POSTS
OPERATION COUNTERATTACK
WHAT
THOSE "IN THE KNOW" SAY
·
“I wish that every citizen of every country in the
free world & every slave behind the Iron Curtain might read this book.” -- Ezra Taft Benson — Former Secretary of Agriculture
·
“NDCC is an admirable job of amassing information to
prove that communism is socialism & socialism (a plot to enslave the world)
is not a movement of the downtrodden but a scheme supported & directed by
the wealthiest of people. If enough Americans read & act upon NDCC, they
really can save the Republic from the conspirators — whose plans for the
destruction of our country are galloping fast toward completion.” -- Dan Smoot — Former Assistant to J. Edgar Hoover
·
“Now that NDCC is available, I no longer need to
answer "no" to the question which is often put to me, namely: ‘Mr.
Dodd, is there a book which I can read so I can know what you know?’ No higher
praise is possible for this book.” -- Norman
Dodd — Chief Investigator Reece Committee to Investigate Foundations
·
“This book concerns the way in which our nation &
other nations are actually governed. As Benjamin Disaeli said, this is not the
way in which most people think nations are governed. The whole subject of the Insiders who so largely
control our political & economic lives is a fascinating mystery. For the
reader who is intelligent but uninitiated in the literature of superpolitics, I
can think of no better introduction to the field than NDCC.” -- Dr. Medford Evans — Former Chief of Security for the
Atom Bomb Project
·
“Since people of the Jewish faith have been the #1
historical victims of the Communist Conspiracy, we wish every member of our
faith would carefully read this book so they will become aware of the forces
which often attempt to manipulate them.” -- Dr. Barney Finkel — President, The Jewish Right
·
“Whatever one dares to call the apparatus described
& documented in this book, he will ignore it at
his peril. 1972 may well be our last chance to defuse this destructive
device. This book tells you how you can expose & demolish it.” -- Dean Clarence E. Manion — Former Dean Notre Dame law
School
You may
have received this book through the mail it is a gift from a concerned American
who has read the book. The donor believes that the survival of our country
hinges on the public becoming aware of the material contained here in. All he
asks is that you read the book. Thank you.Gary Allen is a California-based free-lance journalist. After majoring in history at
First printing, Feb72 - 350,000
Second printing. Mar72 - 1,250,000
Third printing, Apr72 - 4,000,000
Second printing. Mar72 - 1,250,000
Third printing, Apr72 - 4,000,000
Published by Concord Press P.O. Box 2686
Seal Beach , Calif.
90740
Manufactured in theUSA
Manufactured in the
INTRODUCTION
The
story you are about to read is true. The names have not been changed to protect
the guilty. This book may have the effect of changing your life. After reading
this book, you will never look at national & world events in the same way
again.
NDCC will be a very controversial book. At first it will receive
little publicity & those whose plans are exposed in it will try to kill it
by the silent treatment. For reasons that become obvious as you read this book,
it will not be reviewed in all the "proper" places or be available on
your local bookstand. However, there is nothing these people can do to stop a
grass roots book distributing system. Eventually it will be necessary for the
people & organizations named in this book to try to blunt its effect by
attacking it or the author. They have a tremendous vested interest in keeping
you from discovering what they are doing. And they have the big guns of the
mass media at their disposal to fire the barrages at NDCC.
By sheer volume,
the "experts" will try to ridicule you out of investigating for
yourself as to whether or not the information in this book is true They will
ignore the fact that the author about to conjecture. They will find a
typographical error or ague some point that is open to debate. If necessary
they will lie in order to protect themselves by smearing this book. I believe those who pooh-pooh the information herein because
psychologically many people would prefer to believe we are because we all like
to ignore bad news. We do so at our own peril.
Having been a college instructor, a State Senator & now a Congressman,
I have had experience with real professionals at putting up smokescreens to
cover up their own actions by trying to destroy the accuser. I hope that
you will read the book carefully, draw your own conclusions & not accept
the opinions of those who of necessity must attempt to discredit the book. Your
future depends upon it. -- John G. Scmitz, US Congressman, 25Oct71
1. DON'T CONFUSE ME WITH FACTS
Most of us have had the
experience, either as parents or youngsters, of trying to discover the
"hidden picture' within another picture in a children's magazine. Usually
you are shown a landscape with trees, bushes, flowers & other bits of
nature. The caption reads something like this: "Concealed somewhere in
this picture is a donkey pulling a cart with a boy in it. Can you find
them?" Try as you might, usually you could not find the hidden picture
until you turned to a page farther back in the magazine which would reveal how
cleverly the artist had hidden it from us. If we study the landscape we realize
that the whole picture was painted in such a way as to conceal the real picture
within, & once we see the "real picture," it stands out like the
proverbial painful digit.We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for us which deliberately hide the real picture. In this book we will show you how to discover the "hidden picture" in the landscapes presented to us daily through newspapers, radio & TV. Once you can see through the camouflage, you will see the donkey, the cart & the boy who have been there all along.
Millions of Americans are concerned & frustrated over mishappenings in our nation. They feel that something is wrong, drastically wrong, but because of the picture painters they can't quite put their fingers on it.
Maybe you are one of those persons. Something is bugging you, but you aren't sure what. We keep electing new Presidents who seemingly promise faithfully to halt the world-wide Communist advance, put the blocks to extravagant government spending, douse the tea of inflation, put the economy on an even keel, reverse the trend which is turning the country mto a moral sewer, & toss the criminals into the hoosegow where they belong. Yet despite high hopes & glittering campaign promise these problems continue to worsen no matter who is in office. Each new administration, whether it be Republican or Democrat continues the same basic policies of the previous administration which it had so thoroughly denounced during the election campaign. It is considered poor form to mention this, but it is true nonetheless. Is there a plausible reason to explain why this happens? We are not supposed to think so. We are supposed to think it is all accidental & coincidental & that therefore there is nothing we can do about it.
FDR once said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." He was in a good position to know. We believe that many of the major world events that are shaping our destinies occur because somebody or somebodies have planned them that way. If we were merely dealing with the law of avenges, half of the events affecting our nation's well-being should be good for
Those who believe that major world events result from planning are laughed at for believing in the "conspiracy theory of history." Of course, no one in this modern day & age readily believes in the conspiracy theory of history — except those who those who believe that major world events result from planning are laughed at for believing in the "conspiracy theory of history." Of course, no one in this modern day & age really believes in the conspiracy theory of history — except those who have taken the time to study the subject. When you think about it, there are really only 2 theories of history. Either things happen by accident neither planned nor caused by anybody, or they happen because they are planned & somebody causes them to happen. In reality, it is the accidental theory of history preached in the unhallowed Halls of Ivy which should be ridiculed. Otherwise, why does every recent administration make the same mistakes as the previous ones? Why do they repeat the errors of the past which produce inflation, depressions & war? Why does our State Department "stumble" from one Communist-aiding "blunder" to another? If you believe it is all an accident or the result of mysterious & unexplainable tides of history, you will be regarded as an "intellectual" who understands that we live in a complex world. If you believe that something like 32,496 consecutive coincidences over the past 40 years stretches the law of averages a bit, you are a kook!
Why is it that virtually all "reputable" scholars & mass media columnists & commentators reject the cause & effect or conspiratorial theory of history? Primarily, most scholars follow the crowd in the academic world just as most women follow fashions. To buck the tide means social & professional ostracism. The same is true of the mass media. While professors & pontificators profess to be tolerant & broadminded, in practice it's strictly a one way street-with all traffic flowing left. A Maoist can be tolerated by Liberals of Ivory Towerland or by the Establishment's media pundits, but to be a conservative, & a conservative who propounds a conspiratorial view, is absolutely verboten. Better you should be a drunk at a national WCTU convention!
Secondly, these people have over the years acquired a strong vested emotional interest in their own errors. Their intellects & egos are totally committed to the accidental theory. Most people are highly reluctant to admit that they have been conned or have shown poor judgment. To inspect the evidence of the existence of a conspiracy guiding our political destiny from behind the scenes would force many of these people to repudiate a lifetime of accumulated opinions. It takes a person with strong character indeed to face the facts & admit he has been wrong even if it was because he was uninformed. Such was the case with the author of this book. It was only because he set out to prove the conservative anti-Communists wrong that he happened to end up writing this book. His initial reaction to the conservative point of view was one of suspicion & hostility; & it was only after many months of intensive research that he had to admit that he had been "conned."
Politicians & "intellectuals" are attracted to the concept that events are propelled by some mysterious tide of history or happen by accident. By this reasoning they hope to escape the blame when things go wrong.
Most intellectuals, pseudo & otherwise, deal with the conspiratorial theory of history simply by ignoring it. They never attempt to refute the evidence. It can't be refuted. If & when the silent treatment doesn't work, these "objective" scholars & mass media opinion molders resort to personal attacks, ridicule & satire. The personal attacks tend to divert attention from the facts which an author or speaker is trying to expose. The idea is to force the person exposing the conspiracy to stop the exposure & spend his time & effort defending himself.
However, the most effective weapons used against the conspiratorial theory of history are ridicule & satire. These extremely potent weapons can be cleverly used to avoid any honest attempt at refuting the facts. After all, nobody likes to be made fun of. Rather than be ridiculed most people will keep quiet; and, this subject certainly does lend itself to ridicule & satire. One technique which can be used is to expand the conspiracy to the extent it becomes absurd. For instance, our man from the Halls of Poison Ivy might say in a scoffingly arrogant tone, "I suppose you believe every liberal professor gets a telegram each morning from conspiracy HQ containing his orders for the day's brainwashing of his students?" Some conspiratorialists do indeed overdraw the picture by expanding the conspiracy (from the small clique which it is) to include every local knee-jerk liberal activist & government bureaucrat. Or, because of racial or religious bigotry, they will take small fragments of legitimate evidence & expand them into a conclusion that will support their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally "Jewish," "Catholic," or "Masonic." These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but, sadly play into the hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are screwballs.
"Intellectuals" are fond of mouthing clichés like "The conspiracy theory is often tempting. However, it is overly-simplistic." To ascribe absolutely everything that happens to the machinations of a small group of power hungry conspirators is overly simplistic. But, in our opinion nothing is more simplistic than doggedly holding onto the accidental view of major world events.
In most cases Liberals simply accuse all those who discuss the conspiracy of being paranoid. "Ah, you right wingers," they say, "rustling every bush, kicking over every rock, looking for imaginary boogeymen." Then comes the coup de grace -- labeling the conspiratorial theory as the "Devil theory of history." The Liberals love that one. Even though it is an empty phrase, it sounds so sophisticated!
With the leaders of the academic & communications world assuming this sneering attitude towards the conspiratorial (or cause & effect) theory of history, it is not surprising that millions of innocent & well-meaning people, in a natural desire not to appear naive, assume the attitudes & repeat the clichés of the opinion makers. These persons, in their attempt to appear sophisticated, assume their mentors' air of smug superiority even though they themselves have not spent 5 minutes in study on the subject of international conspiracy.
The "accidentalists" would have us believe that ascribing any of our problems to planning is "simplistic" & all our problems are caused by Poverty, Ignorance & Disease -- hereinafter abbreviated as PID. They ignore the fact that organized conspirators use PID, real & imagined, as an excuse to build a jail for us all. Most of the world has been in PID since time immemorial & it takes incredibly superficial thinking to ascribe the ricocheting of the
It is not true, however, to state that there are no members of the intellectual elite who subscribe to the conspiratorial theory of history. For example, there is Professor Carroll Quigley of the Foreign Service School at
"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for 20 years & was permitted for 2 years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers & secret records. I HAVE NO AVERSION TO IT OR TO MOST OF ITS AIMS & HAVE, FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, BEEN CLOSE TO IT & TO MANY OF ITS INSTRUMENTS. I have objected, both in the past & recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that IT WISHES TO REMAIN UNKNOWN, & I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." (Emphasis added)
We agree, its role in history does deserve to be known. That is why we have written this book. However, we most emphatically disagree with this network's aim which the Professor describes as "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country & the economy of the world as a whole." In other words, this power mad clique wants to control & rule the world. Even more frightening, they want total control over all individual actions. As Professor Quigley observes: "… his [the individual's] freedom & choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth & followed, as a number, through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health & medical requirements, & his final retirement & death benefits." It wants control over all natural resources, business, banking & transportation by controlling the governments of the world. In order to accomplish these aims the conspirators have had no qualms about fomenting wars, depressions & hatred. They want a monopoly which would eliminate all competitors & destroy the free' enterprise system. And Professor Quigley, of Harvard, Princeton & Georgetown approves!
Professor Quigley is not the only academic who is aware of the existence of a clique of self-perpetuating conspirators whom we shall call Insiders. Other honest scholars finding the same individuals at the scenes of disastrous political fires over & over again have concluded that there 'is obviously an organization of pyromaniacs at work in the world. But these intellectually honest scholars realize that if they challenged the Insiders head-on, their careers would be destroyed. The author knows these men exist because he has been in contact with some of them.
There are also religious leaders who are aware of the existence of this conspiracy. In a UPI story dated 27Dec65, Father Pedro Arrupe, head of the Jesuit Order of the Roman Catholic Church, made the following charges during his remarks to the Ecumenical Council:
"This … Godless society operates in an extremely efficient manner at least in its higher levels of leadership. It makes use of every possible means at its disposal, be they scientific, technical, social or economic. It follows a perfectly mapped-out strategy. It holds almost complete sway in international organizations, in financial circles, in the field of mass communications; press, cinema, radio & TV."
There are a number of problems to be overcome in convincing a person of the possible existence of a conspiratorial clique of Insiders who from the very highest levels manipulate government policy. In this case truth is really stranger than fiction. We are dealing with history's greatest "whodunit," a mystery thriller which puts Erle Stanley Gardner to shame. If you love a mystery, you'll be fascinated with the study of the operations of the insiders. If you do study this network of which Professor Quigley speaks, you will find that what had at first seemed incredible not only exists, but heavily influences our lives.
It must be remembered that the first job of any conspiracy, whether it be in politics, crime or within a business office, is to convince everyone else that no conspiracy exists. The conspirators success will be determined largely by their ability to do this. That the elite of the academic world & mass communications media always pooh-pooh the existence of the Insiders merely serves to camouflage their operations. These "artists" hide the boy, the cart & the donkey.
Probably at some time you have been involved with or had personal knowledge of some event which was reported in the news. Perhaps it concerned an athletic event, an election, a committee or your business. Did the report contain the "real" story, the story behind the story? Probably not. And for a variety of reasons. The reporter had time & space problems & there is a good chance the persons involved deliberately did not reveal all the facts. Possibly the reporter's own prejudices governed what facts went into the story & which were deleted. Our point is that most people know from personal experience that a news story often is not the whole story. But many of us assume that our own case is unique when really it is typical. What is true about the reporting of local events is equally as true about the reporting of national & international events.
Psychological problems are also involved in inducing people to look at the evidence concerning the Insiders. People are usually comfortable with their old beliefs & conceptions. When
These same factors apply today. Because the Establishment controls the media, anyone exposing the Insiders will be the recipient of a continuous fusillade of invective from newspapers, magazines, TV & radio. In this manner one is threatened with loss of "social respectability" if he dares broach the idea that there is organization behind any of the problems currently wracking
If you ask these people which is more important -- social respectability or saving their children from slavery -- they will tell you the latter, of course. But their actions (or lack of same) speak so much louder than their words. People have an infinite capacity for rationalization when it comes to refusing to face the threat to
One thing which makes it so hard for some socially minded people to assess the conspiratorial evidence objectively is that the conspirators come from the very highest social strata. They are immensely wealthy, highly educated & extremely cultured. Many of them have lifelong reputations for philanthropy. Nobody enjoys being put in the position of accusing prominent people of conspiring to enslave their fellow Americans, but the facts are inescapable. Many business & professional people are particularly vulnerable to the "don't jeopardize your social respectability" pitch given by those who don't want the conspiracy exposed. The Insiders know that if the business & professional community will not take a stand to save the private enterprise system, the socialism through which they intend to control the world will be inevitable. They believe that most business & professional men are too shallow & decadent, too status conscious, too tied up in the problems of their jobs & businesses to worry about what is going on in politics. These men are told that it might be bad for business or jeopardize their government contracts if they take a stand. They have been bribed into silence with their own tax monies!
We are hoping that the conspirators have underestimated the courage & patriotism remaining in the American people. We feel there are a sufficient number of you who are not mesmerized by the television set, who put God, family & country above social status, who will band together to expose & destroy the conspiracy of the Insiders. The philosopher Diogenes scoured the length & breadth of ancient
2. SOCIALISM — ROYAL ROAD
Everyone knows that Adolph
Hitler existed. No one disputes that. The terror & destruction that this
madman inflicted upon the world are universally recognized. Hitler came from a
poor family which had absolutely no social position. He was a high school
drop-out & nobody ever accused him of being cultured. Yet this man tried to
conquer the world. During his early career he sat in a cold garret & poured
onto paper his ambitions to rule the world. We know that.Similarly, we know that a man named Vladimir Ilich Lenin also existed. Like Hitler, Lenin did not spring from a family of social lions. The son of a petty bureaucrat, Lenin, who spent most of his adult life in poverty, has been responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of your fellow human beings & the enslavement of nearly a billion more. Like Hitler, Lenin sat up nights in a dank garret scheming how he could conquer the world. We know that too.
Is it not theoretically possible that a billionaire could be sitting, not in a garret, but in a penthouse, in
It is difficult for the average individual to fathom such perverted lust for power. The typical person, of whatever nationality, wants only to enjoy success in his job, to be able to afford a reasonably high standard of living complete with leisure & travel. He wants to provide for his family in sickness & in health & to give his children a sound education. His ambition stops there. He has no desire to exercise power over others, to conquer other lands or peoples, to be a king. He wants to mind his own business & enjoy life. Since he has no lust for power, it is difficult for him to imagine that there are others who have … others who march to a far different drum. But we must realize that there have been Hitlers & Lenins & Stalins & Caesars & Alexander the Greats throughout history. Why should we assume there are no such men today with perverted lusts for power? And if these men happen to be billionaires is it not possible that they would use men like Hitler & Lenin as pawns to seize power for themselves?
Indeed, difficult as this is to believe, such is the case. Like
The concept that Communism is but an arm of a larger conspiracy has become increasingly apparent throughout the author's journalistic investigations. He has had the opportunity to interview privately four retired officers who spent their careers high in military intelligence. Much of what the author knows he learned from them. And the story is known to several thousand others. High military intelligence circles are well aware of this network. In addition, the-author has interviewed 6 men who have spent considerable time as investigators for Congressional committees. In 1953, one of these men, Norman Dodd, headed the Reece Committee's investigation of tax-free foundations. When Mr. Dodd began delving into the role of international high finance in the world revolutionary movement, the investigation was killed on orders from the Eisenhower occupied White House. According to Mr. Dodd, it is permissible to investigate the radical bomb throwers in the streets, but when you begin to trace their activities back to their origins in the "legitimate world," the political iron curtain slams down.
You can believe anything you want about Communism except that it is a conspiracy run by men from the respectable world. People will often say to an active anti-Communist: "I can understand your concern with Communism, but the idea that a Communist conspiracy is making great inroads in the
On the face of it, that is a very logical & plausible argument. The American people are indeed anti-Communist. Suppose you were to lay this book down right now, pick up a clipboard & head for the nearest shopping center to conduct a survey on Americans' attitudes about Communism. "Sir," you say to the first prospect you encounter, "we would like to know if you are for or against Communism?"
Most people would probably think you were putting them on. If we stick to our survey we would find that ninety-nine percent of the people are anti-Communist. We probably would be hard put to find anybody who would take an affirmative stand for Communism.
So, on the surface it appears that the charges made against anti-Communists concerned with the internal threat of Communism are valid. The American people are not pro-Communist. But before our imaginary interviewee walks away in disgust with what he believes is a hokey survey, you add: "Sir, before you leave there are a couple of other questions I would like to ask. You won't find these quite so insulting or ludicrous." Your next question is: "What is Communism? Will you define it, please?"
Immediately a whole new situation has developed. Rather than the near-unanimity previously found, we now have an incredible diversity of ideas. There are a multitude of opinions on what Communism is. Some will say: "Oh, yes, Communism. Well, that's a tyrannical brand of socialism." Others will maintain "Communism as it was originally intended by Karl Marx was a good idea. But it has never been practiced & the Russians have loused it up." A more erudite type might proclaim: "Communism is simply a rebirth of Russian imperialism."
If perchance one of the men you ask to define Communism happened to be a political science professor from the local college, he might well reply: "You can't ask 'What is Communism?' That is a totally simplistic question about an extremely complex situation. Communism today, quite unlike the view held by the right wing extremists in
If you think we are being facetious here, you haven't talked to a political science professor lately. For the above is the prevailing view on our. campuses, not to mention in our State Department.
Whether you agree or disagree with any of these definitions, or, as may well be the case, you have one of your own, one thing is undeniable. No appreciable segment of the anti-Communist American public can agree on just what it is that they are against. Isn't that frightening? Here we have something that almost everybody agrees is bad, but we' cannot agree on just what it is we are against.
How would this work in a football game, for example? Can you imagine how effective the defense of a football team would be if the front four could not agree with the linebackers who could not agree with the corner backs who could not agree with the safety men who could not agree with the assistant coaches who could not agree with the head coach as to what kind of defense they should put up against the offense being presented? The obvious result would be chaos. You could take a sand lot team & successfully pit them against the Green Bay Packers if the Packers couldn't agree on what it is they are opposing. That is academic. The first principle in any encounter, whether it be football or war (hot or cold), is: Know your enemy. The American people do not know their enemy. Consequently, it is not strange at all that for 3 decades we have been watching one country of the world after another fall behind the Communist curtain.
In keeping with the fact that almost everybody seems to have his own definition of Communism, we are going to give you ours, & then we will attempt to prove to you that it is the only valid one. Communism: AN INTERNATIONAL, CONSPIRATORIAL DRIVE FOR POWER ON THE PART OF MEN IN HIGH PLACES WILLING TO USE ANY MEANS TO BRING ABOUT THEIR DESIRED AIM - GLOBAL CONQUEST.
You will notice that we did not mention Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, bourgeois, proletariat or dialectical materialism. We said nothing of the pseudo-economics or political philosophy of the Communists. These are the TECHNIQUES of Communism & should not be confused with the Communist conspiracy itself. We did call it an international conspiratorial drive for power. Unless we understand the conspiratorial nature of Communism, we don't understand it at all. We will be eternally fixated at the Gus Hall level of Communism. And that's not where it's at, baby!
The way to bring down the wrath of the Liberal press Establishment or the professional Liberals is simply to use the word conspiracy in relation to Communism. We are not supposed to believe that Communism is a political conspiracy. We can believe anything else we wish to about it. We can believe that it is brutal, tyrannical, evil or even that it intends to bury us, & we will win the plaudits of the vast majority of American people. But don't ever, ever use the word conspiracy if you expect applause, for that is when the wrath of Liberaldom will be unleashed against you. We are not disallowed from believing in all types of conspiracy, just modern political conspiracy.
We know that down through the annals of history small groups of men have existed who have conspired to bring the reins of power into their hands. History books are full of their schemes. Even Life magazine believes in conspiracies like the Cosa Nostra where men conspire to make money through crime. You may recall that LIFE did a series of articles on the testimony of Joseph Valachi before the McClellan Committee several years ago. There are some aspects of those revelations which are worth noting.
Most of us did not know the organization was called Cosa Nostra. Until Valachi "sang" we all thought it was named the Mafia. That is how little we knew about this group, despite the fact that it was a century old & had been operating in many countries with a self-perpetuating clique of leaders. We didn't even know it by its proper name. It is not possible a political conspiracy might exist, waiting for a Joseph Valachi to testify? Is Dr. Carroll Quigley the Joseph Valachi of political conspiracies?
We see that everybody, even LIFE magazine, believes in some sort of conspiracy. The question is: Which is the more lethal form of conspiracy criminal or political? And what is the difference between a member of the Cosa Nostra & a Communist, or more properly, an insider conspirator? Men like Lucky Luciano who have scratched & clawed to the top of the heap in organized crime must, of necessity, be diabolically brilliant, cunning & absolutely ruthless. But, almost without exception, the men in the hierarchy of organized crime have had no formal education. They were born into poverty & learned their trade in the back alleys of
Now suppose someone with this same amoral grasping personality were born into a patrician family of great wealth & was educated at the best prep schools, then Harvard, Yale or Princeton, followed by graduate work possibly at Oxford. In these institutions he would become totally familiar with history, economics, psychology, sociology & political science. After having graduated from such illustrious establishments of higher learning, are we likely to find him out on the streets peddling 50-cent tickets to a numbers game? Would you find him pushing marijuana to high schoolers or running a string of houses of prostitution? Would he be getting involved in gang-land killings? Not at all. For with that sort of education, this person would realize that if one wants power, real power, the lessons of history say, "Get into the government business." Become a politician & work for political power or, better yet, get some politicians to front for you. That is where the real power -- & the real money -- is.
Conspiracy to seize the power of government is as old as government itself. We can study the conspiracies surrounding Alcibiades in
Every conspirator has 2 things in common with every other conspirator. He must be an accomplished liar & a far-seeing planner. Whether you are studying Hitler, Alcibiades, Julius Caesar or some of our contemporary conspirators, you will find that their patient planning is almost overwhelming. We repeat FDR's statement: "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
In reality, Communism is a tyranny planned by power seekers whose most effective weapon is the big lie. And if one takes all the lies of Communism & boils them down, you will find they distill into 2 major lies out of which all others spring. They are: (1) Communism is inevitable, & (2) Communism is a movement of the downtrodden masses rising up against exploiting bosses.
Let us go back to our imaginary survey & analyze our first big lie of Communism -- that it is inevitable. You will recall that we asked our interviewee if he was for or against Communism & then we asked him to define it. Now we are going to ask him: "Sir, do you think Communism is inevitable in
Next we ask: "Well then, do you think socialism is inevitable in
Then we ask our interviewee: "Since you say you are not a socialist but you feel the country is being socialized, why don't you do something about it?" His response will rim: "I'm only one person. Besides it's inevitable. You can't fight City Hall, heh, heh, heh."
Don't you know that the boys down at City Hall are doing everything they can to convince you of that? How effectively can you oppose anything if you feel your opposition is futile? Giving your opponent the idea that defending himself is futile is as old as warfare itself. In about 500 B.C. the Chinese war lord-philosopher Sun Tsu stated, "Supreme excellence in warfare lies in the destruction of your enemy's will to resist in advance of perceptible hostilities." We call it "psy war" or psychological warfare today. In poker, it is called "running a good bluff." The principle is the same.
Thus we have the American people: anti-Communist, but unable to define it & anti-socialist, but thinking it is' inevitable. How did Marx view Communism? How important is "the inevitability of Communism" to the Communists? What do the Communists want you to believe is inevitable Communism or socialism? If you study Marx' Communist Manifesto you will find that in essence Marx said the proletarian revolution would establish the SOCIALIST dictatorship of the proletariat. To achieve the SOCIALIST dictatorship of the proletariat, 3 things would have to be accomplished: (1) The elimination of all right to private property; (2) The dissolution of the family unit; & (3) Destruction of what Marx referred to as the "opiate of the people," religion.
Marx went on to state that when the dictatorship of the proletariat had accomplished these three things throughout the world, & after some undetermined length of time (as you can imagine, he was very vague on this point), the all powerful state would miraculously wither away & state socialism would give way to Communism. You wouldn't need any government at all. Everything would be peace, sweetness & light & everybody would live happily ever after. But first, all Communists must work to establish SOCIALISM.
Can't you just see Karl Marx really believing that an omnipotent state would wither away? Or can you imagine that a Joseph Stalin (or any other man with the cunning' & ruthlessness necessary to rise to the top of the heap in. an all-powerful dictatorship) would voluntarily dismantle the power he had built by fear & terror?'*
(*Karl Marx was hired by a mysterious group who called themselves the League of Just Men to write the Communist Manifesto as demogogic boob-bait to appeal to the mob. In actual fact the Communist Manifesto was in circulation for many years before Marx' name was widely enough recognized to establish his authorship for this revolutionary handbook. All Karl Marx really did was to update & codify the very same revolutionary plans & principles set down 70 years earlier by Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Order of illuminati in
Socialism would be the bait … the excuse to establish the dictatorship. Since dictatorship is hard to sell in idealistic terms, the idea had to be added that the dictatorship was just a temporary necessity & would soon dissolve of its own accord. You really have to be naive to swallow that, but millions do?
The drive to establish SOCIALISM, not Communism, is at the core of everything the Communists & the Insiders do. Marx & all of his successors in the Communist movement have ordered their followers to work on building SOCIALISM. If you go to hear an official Communist speaker, he never mentions Communism. He will speak only of the struggle to complete the socialization of
And many members of the Establishment push this same theme. The Sept70 issue of
"Mr. Nixon is probably not a great reader of Marx, but [his advisors] Drs. Burns, Shultz & McCracken are excellent scholars who know him well & could have brought the President abreast & it is beyond denying that the crisis that aided the rush into socialism was engineered by the Administration…"
Dr. Gaibraith began his article by stating:
"Certainly the least predicted development under the Nixon Administration was this great new thrust to socialism. One encounters people who still aren't aware of it. Others must be rubbing their eyes, for certainly the portents seemed all to the contrary. As & opponent of socialism, Mr. Nixon seemed steadfast…
Gaibraith then proceeds to list the giant steps toward socialism taken by the Nixon Administration. The conclusion one draws from the article is that socialism, whether it be from the Democrat or Republican Parties, is inevitable. Fellow Harvard socialist Dr. Arthur Schlesinger has said much the same thing:
"The chief liberal gains in the past generally remain on the statute books when the conservatives recover power liberalism grows constantly more liberal, & by the same token, conservatism grows constantly less conservative…"
Many extremely patriotic individuals have innocently fallen for the conspiracy's line. Walter Trohan, columnist emeritus for the Chicago Tribune & one of
"It is a known fact that the policies of the government today, whether Republican or Democratic, are closer to the 1932 platform of the Communist Party than they are to either of their own party platforms in that critical year. More than 100 years ago, in 1848 to be exact, Karl Marx promulgated his program for the socialized state in the Communist Manifesto…"
And Mr. Trohan has also been led to believe that the trend is inevitable:
"Conservatives should be realistic enough to recognize that this country is going deeper into socialism & will see expansion of federal power, whether Republicans or Democrats are in power. The only comfort they may have is that the pace will be slower under Richard M. Nixon than it might have been under Hubert H. Humphrey…
Conservatives are going to have to recognize that the Nixon Administration will embrace most of the socialism of the Democratic administrations, while professing to improve it…
The Establishment promotes the idea of the inevitability of Communism through its perversion of terms used in describing the political spectrum. (See Chart 1) We are told that on the far Left of the political spectrum we find Communism, which is admittedly dictatorial. But, we are also told that equally to be feared is the opposite of the far Left, i.e., the far Right, which is labeled Fascism. We are constantly told that we should all try to stay m the middle of the road, which is termed democracy, but by which the Establishment means Fabian (or creeping) socialism. (The fact that the middle of the road has been moving. inexorably leftward for forty years is ignored.) Here is an excellent example of the use of false alternatives. We are given the choice between Communism (international socialism) on one end of the spectrum Naziism (national socialism) on the other end, or Fabian socialism in the middle. The whole spectrum is socialist!
This is absurd. Where would you put an anarchist on this spectrum? Where do you put a person who believes in a
Chart 1 & 2
#1
Dictatorship
Democracy Dictatorship
Communism Fabian Socialism Fascism
#2
Total
Govt. Anarchy
Communism Constitutional
Socialism Limited Govt
Pharoahism
Caesarism
Chart 1 depicts a false
Left-Right political spectrum used by Liberals which has Communism
(International Socialism) on the far Left & its twin, Fascism (National
Socialism) on the far Right with the "middle of the road" being
Fabian Socialism. The entire spectrum is SocialistChart 2 is a more rational political spectrum with total government in any form on the far Left & no government or anarchy on the far right. The
There is an accurate political spectrum. (See Chart 2.) Communism is, by definition, total government. If you have total government it makes little difference whether you call it Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Caesarism or Pharaohism. It's all pretty much the same from the standpoint of the people who must live & suffer under it. If total government (by any of its pseudonyms) stands on the far Left, then by logic the far Right should represent anarchy, or no government.
Our Founding Fathers revolted against the near-total government of the English monarchy. But they knew that having no government at all would lead to chaos. So they set up a
It was
Since all Communists & their Insider bosses are waging a constant struggle for SOCIALISM, let us define that term. Socialism is usually defined as government ownership &/or control over the basic means of production & distribution of goods & services. When analyzed this means government control over everything, including you. All controls are "people" controls. If the government controls these areas it can eventually do just exactly as Marx set out to do -- destroy the right to private property, eliminate the family & wipe out religion.
We are being socialized in
Doesn't it strike you as strange that some of the individuals pushing hardest for socialism have their own personal wealth protected in family trusts & tax-free foundations? Men like Rockefeller, Ford & Kennedy are for every socialist program known to man which will increase your taxes. Yet they pay little, if anything, in taxes themselves. An article published by the North American Newspaper Alliance in Aug67 tells how the Rockefellers pay practically no income taxes despite their vast wealth. The article reveals that one of the Rockefellers paid the grand total of $685 personal income tax during a recent year. The Kennedys have their Chicago Merchandise Mart, their mansions, yachts, 'planes, etc., all owned by their myriads of family foundations & trusts. Taxes are for peons! Yet hypocrites like Rockefeller, Ford & Kennedy pose as great champions of the "downtrodden." If they were really concerned about the poor, rather than using socialism as a means of' achieving personal political power, they would divest themselves of their own fortunes. There is no law which prevents them from giving away their own fortunes to the poverty stricken. Shouldn't these men set all example? And practice what they preach? If they advocate sharing the wealth, shouldn't they start with their own instead of that of the middle class which pays almost all the taxes? Why don't Nelson Rockefeller & Henry Ford II give away all their wealth, retaining only enough to place themselves at the national average? Can't you imagine Teddy Kennedy giving up his mansion, airplane & yacht & moving into a $25,000 home with a $20,000 mortgage like the rest of us?
We are usually told that this clique of super-rich are socialists because they have a guilt complex over wealth they inherited & did not earn. Again, they could relieve these supposed guilt complexes simply by divesting themselves of their unearned wealth. There' are doubtless many wealthy do-gooders who have been given a guilt complex by their college professors, but that doesn't explain the actions of Insiders like the Rockefellers, Fords or Kennedys. All their actions betray them as power seekers.
But the Kennedys, Rockefellers & their super-rich confederates are not being hypocrites in advocating socialism. It appears to be a contradiction for the super-rich to work for socialism & the destruction of free enterprise. In reality it is not.
Our problem is that most of us believe socialism is what the socialists want us to believe it is -- a share-the-wealth program. That is the theory. But is that how it works? Let us examine the only Socialist countries according to the Socialist definition of the word extant in the world today. These are the Communist countries. The Communists themselves refer to these as Socialist countries, as in the
If one understands that socialism is not a share-the Wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate & control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. The plan of the conspirator Insiders then is to socialize the
How is this to be accomplished? Chart 3 shows the structure of our government as established by our Founding Fathers. The Constitution fractionalized & subdivided governmental power in every way possible. The Founding Fathers believed that each branch of the government, whether at the federal, state or local level, would be jealous of its powers & would never surrender them to centralized control. Also, many phases of our lives (such as charity & education) were put totally, or almost totally, out of the grasp of politicians. Under this system you could not have a dictatorship. No segment of government could possibly amass enough power to form a dictatorship. In order to have a dictatorship one must have a single branch holding most of the reins of power. Once you have this, a dictatorship is inevitable.
Charts
FEDERALGOVT.
State Govts.
Labor Finance Business Executive Legislative Judicial Courts City
County
DEMOCRATIC
SOCIALISM
EXECUTIVE
Labor
Finance Business Legislative Judicial States Counties Cities Charity Police
Educ.
A dictatorship was
impossible in our Republic because power was widely diffused. Today, as we
approach Democratic Socialism1 all power is being centralized at the apex of
the executive branch of the federal government. This concentration of power
makes a dictatorship inevitable. Those who control the President indirectly
gain virtual control of the whole country.The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes noted: "Freedom is government divided into small fragments." Woodrow Wilson, before he became the tool of the Insiders, observed: "This history of liberty is a history of the limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it." And the English historian Lord Acton commented: "Power tends to corrupt & absolute power corrupts absolutely." Even though these men lived after our Constitution was written, our forefathers understood these principles completely.
But what is happening today? As we move leftward along the political spectrum towards socialism, all the reins of power are being centralized in the executive branch of the federal government. Much of this is being done by buying with legislation or with "free" federal grants all the other entities. Money is used as bait & the hook is federal control. The Supreme Court has ruled, & in this case quite logically, that it is hardly lack of due process for the government to regulate that which it subsidizes."
If you & your clique wanted control over the
3. THE MONEY MANIPULATORS
Many college history
professors tell their charges that the books they will be using in the class
are "objective." But stop & ask yourself: Is it possible to write
a history book without a particular point of view? There are billions of
events, which take place in the world each day. To think of writing a complete
history of a nation covering even a year is absolutely incredible.Not only is a historian's ability to write an "objective" history limited by the sheer volume of happenings, but by the fact that many of the most important happenings never appear in the papers or even in somebody's memoirs. The decisions reached by the "Big Boys" in the smoke-filled rooms are not reported even in the NYT which ostensibly reports all the news that is fit to print. ("All the news that fits" is a more accurate description
In order to build his case, a historian must select a miniscule number of facts from the limited number that are known. If he does not have a theory, how does he separate important facts from unimportant ones? As Professor Stuart Crane has pointed out, this is why every book "proves" the author's thesis. But no book is objective. No book can be objective; & this book is not objective. (Liberal reviewers should have a ball quoting that out of context.) The information in it is true, but the book is not objective. We have carefully selected the facts to prove our case. We believe that most other historians have focused on the landscape, & ignored that which is most important: the cart, boy & donkey.
Most of the facts which we bring out are readily verifiable at any large library. But our contention is that we have arranged these facts in the order which most accurately reveals their true significance in history. These are the facts the Establishment does not want you to know.
Have you ever had the experience of walking into a mystery movie two-thirds of the way through? Confusing wasn't it? All the evidence made it look as if the butler were the murderer, but in the final scenes you find out, surprisingly, that it was the man's wife all along. You have to stay & see the beginning of the film. Then as all the pieces fall into place, the story makes sense.
This situation is very similar to the one in which millions of Americans find themselves today. They are confused by current happenings in the nation. They have come in as the movie, so to speak, is going into its' conclusion. The earlier portion of the mystery is needed to make the whole thing understandable. (Actually, we are not really starting at the beginning, but we are going back far enough to give meaning to today's happenings.)
In order to understand the conspiracy it is necessary to have some rudimentary knowledge of banking and, particularly, of international bankers. While it would be an over-simplification to ascribe the entire conspiracy to international bankers, they nevertheless have played a key role. Think of the conspiracy as a hand with one finger labeled "international banking," others "foundations," "the anti-religion movement" "Fabian Socialism," & "Communism." But it was the international bankers of whom Professor Quigley was speaking when we quoted him earlier as stating that their aim was nothing less than control of the world through finance.
Where do governments get the enormous amounts of money they need? Most, of course, comes from taxation; but governments often spend more than they are willing to tax from their citizens & so are forced to borrow. Our national debt is now $455 billion, every cent of it borrowed at interest from somewhere.
The public is led to believe that our government borrows from "the people" through savings bonds. Actually, only the smallest percentage of the national debt is held by individuals in this form. Most government bonds, except those owned by the government itself through its trust funds, are held by vast banking firms known as international banks.
For centuries there has been big money to be made by international bankers in the financing of governments & kings. Such operators are faced, however, with certain thorny problems. We know that smaller banking operations protect themselves by taking collateral, but what kind of collateral can you get from a government or a king? What if the banker comes to collect & the king says, "Off with his head"? The process through which one collects a debt from a government or a monarch is not a subject taught in the business schools of our universities, & most of us -- never having been in the business of financing kings -- have not given the problem much thought. But there is a king-financing business & to those who can ensure collection it is lucrative indeed.
Economics Professor Stuart Crane notes that there are 2 means used to collateralize loans to governments & kings. Whenever a business firm borrows big money its creditor obtains a voice in management to protect his investment. Like a business, no government can borrow big money unless willing to surrender to the creditor some measure of sovereignty as collateral. Certainly international bankers who have loaned hundred of billions of dollars to governments around the work command considerable influence in the policies of such governments.
But the ultimate advantage the creditor has over the king or president is that if the ruler gets out of line the banker can finance his enemy or rival. Therefore, if you want to stay in the lucrative king-financing business, it is wise to have an enemy or rival waiting in the wings to unseat every king or president to whom you lend. If the king doesn't have an enemy, you must create one.
Preeminent in playing this game was the famous House of Rothschild. Its founder, Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of
"If you will look back at every war in
In describing the characteristics of the Rothschilds & other major international bankers, Dr. Quigley tells us that they remained different from ordinary bankers in several ways: they were cosmopolitan & international; they were close to governments & were particularly concerned with government debts, including foreign government debts; these bankers came to be called "international bankers." (Quigley, Tragedy & Hope, p.52)
One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the international bankers in political history is that the Rothschilds were Jewish. Anti-Semites have played into the hands of the conspiracy by trying to portray the entire conspiracy as Jewish. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The traditionally Anglo-Saxon J.P. Morgan & Rockefeller international banking institutions have played a key role in the conspiracy. But there is no denying the importance of the Rothschilds & their satellites. However, it is just as unreasonable & immoral to blame all Jews for the crimes of the Rothschilds as it is to hold all Baptists accountable for the crimes of the Rockefellers.
The Jewish members of the conspiracy have used an organization called the Anti-Defamation League as an instrument to try to convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds or their allies is an attack on all Jews. In this way they have stifled almost all honest scholarship on international bankers & made the subject taboo within universities.
Any individual or book exploring this subject is immediately attacked by hundreds of A.D.L. committees all over the country. The A.D.L. has never let truth or logic interfere with its highly-professional smear jobs. When no evidence is apparent, the A.D.L., which staunchly opposed so-called "McCarthyism," accuses people of being "latent anti-Semites." Can you imagine how they would yowl & scream if someone accused them of being "latent" Communists?
Actually, nobody has a right to be more angry at the Rothschild clique than their fellow Jews. The Warburgs, part of the Rothschild empire, helped finance Adolph Hitler. There were few if any Rothschilds or Warburgs in the Nazi prison camps! They sat out the war in luxurious hotels in
Since the keystone of the international banking empires has been government bonds it has been in the interest of these international bankers to encourage government debt. The higher the debt the more the interest Nothing drives government deeply into debt like a war; & it has not been an uncommon practice among international bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts. For example, during our Civil War the North was financed by the Rothschilds through their American agent, August Belmont, & the American South through the Erlangers, Rothschild relatives.
But while wars & revolutions have been useful to international bankers in gaining or increasing control over governments, the key to such control has always been control of money. You can control a government if you have it in your debt; a creditor is in a position to demand the privileges of monopoly from the sovereign. Money-seeking governments have granted monopolies in state banking, natural resources, oil concessions & transportation. However, the monopoly which the international financiers most covet is control over a nation's money.
Eventually these international bankers actually owned as private corporations the central banks of the various European nations. The Bank of England, Bank of France & Bank of Germany were not owned by their respective governments, as almost everyone imagines, but were privately owned monopolies granted by the heads of state, usually in return for loans. Under this system, observed Reginald McKenna, President of the Midlands Bank of
"Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills."
All those who have sought dictatorial control over modern nations have understood the necessity of a central bank. When the League of Just Men hired a hack revolutionary named Karl Marx to write a blueprint for conquest called The Communist Manifesto, the fifth plank read: "Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital & an exclusive monopoly." Lenin later said that the establishment of a central bank was ninety percent of communizing a country. Such conspirators knew that you can not take control of a nation without military force unless that nation has a central bank through which you can control its economy. The anarchist Bakunin sarcastically remarked about the followers of Karl Marx: "They have one foot in the bank & one foot in the socialist movement."
The international financiers set up their own front man in charge of each of
"It must not be felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians & agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up & were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called 'international' or 'merchants' bankers) who renamed largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated (private banks.] These formed a system of international cooperation & national dominance which was more private, more powerful, & more secret than that of their agents in the central banks… (Quigley, op.cit., pp.326-7)
Dr. Quigley also reveals that the international bankers who owned & controlled the Banks of
Naturally those who controlled the central banks of Europe were eager from the start to fasten a similar establishment on the
But, even though America did not have a central bank after President Jackson abolished it in 1836, the European financiers & their American agents managed to obtain a great deal of control over our monetary system. Gustavus Myers, in his History of The Great American Fortunes, reveals:
"Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the
During the 19th century the leading financiers of the metropolitan East often cut one another's financial throats, but as their Western & rural victims started to organize politically, the "robber barons" saw that they had a "community of interest" toward which they must work together to protect themselves from thousands of irate farmers & up & coming competitors. This diffusion of economic power was one of the main factors stimulating the demands for a central bank by would-be business & financial monopolists.
In Years of Plunder Proctor Hansl writes of this era:
"Among the Morgans, Kuhn-Loebs & other similar pillars of the industrial order there was less disposition to become involved in disagreements that led to financial dislocation. A community of interest came into being, with results that were highly beneficial…"
But aside from the major Eastern centers, most American bankers & their customers still distrusted the whole concept
In order to show the hinterlands that they were going to need a central banking system, the international bankers created a series of panics as a demonstration of their power a warning of what would happen unless the rest of the bankers got into line. The man in charge of conducting these lessons was John Pierpont Morgan, American-born but educated in
By the turn of the century J.P. Morgan was already an old hand at creating artificial panics. Such affairs were well coordinated. Senator Robert Owen, a co-author of the Federal Reserve Act, (who later deeply regretted his role), testified before a Congressional Committee that the bank he owned received from the National Bankers' Association what came to be known as the "Panic Circular of 1893." It stated: "You will at once retire one-third of your circulation & call in one-half of your loans…
Historian Frederick Lewis Allen tells in LIFE magazine of 25Apr49, of Morgan's role in spreading rumors about the insolvency of the Knickerbocker Bank & The Trust Company of
"Oakleigh Thorne, the president of that particular trust company, testified later before a congressional committee that his bank had been subjected to only moderate withdrawals … that he had not applied for help, & that it was the [Morgan's] 'sore point' statement alone that had caused the run on his bank. From this testimony, plus the disciplinary measures taken by the Clearing House against the Heinze, Morse & Thomas banks, plus other fragments of supposedly pertinent evidence, certain chroniclers have arrived at the ingenious conclusion that the Morgan interests took advantage of the unsettled conditions during the autumn of 1907 to precipitate the panic, guiding it shrewdly as it progressed so that it would kill off rival banks & consolidate the preeminence of the banks within the Morgan orbit."
The "panic" which Morgan had created, he proceeded to end almost single-handedly. He had made his point. Frederick Allen explains:
"The lesson of the Panic of 1907 was clear, though not for some 6 years was it destined to be embodied in legislation: the
The man who was to play the most significant part in providing America with that central bank was Paul Warburg, who along with his brother Felix had immigrated to the US from Germany in 1902. (See Chart 4.) They left brother Max (later a major financier of the Russian Revolution) at home in
Paul Warburg married Nina Loeb, daughter of Solomon Loeb of Kuhn, Loeb & Company,
Both Paul & Felix Warburg became partners in Kuhn, Loeb & Company.
In 1907, the year of the Morgan-precipitated panic, Paul Warburg began spending almost all of his time writing & lecturing on the need for "bank reform." Kuhn, Loeb & Company was sufficiently public spirited about the matter to keep him on salary at $500,000 per year while for the next 6 years he donated his time to "the public good."
Working with Warburg in promoting this "banking reform" was Nelson Aldrich, known as "Morgan's floor broker in the Senate." Aldrich's daughter Abby married John D. Rockefeller Jr. (the current Governor of NY is named for his maternal grandfather).
Chart 4
FEDERAL RESERVE
Nina Loeb
Paul Warburg
Max Warburg
Kuhn, Loeb & Co.
Jekyl Island
Felix Warburg
Nelson Aldrich
Freida Schiff
Frank Vanderlip
Henry Davison
Jacob Schiff
"Colonial" House
Piatt Andrew
Benjamin Strong
Woodrow Wilson
After the Panic of 1907,
Aldrich was appointed by the Senate to head the National Monetary Commission.
Although he had no technical knowledge of banking,
Aldrich & his entourage spent nearly 2 years & $300,000 of the
taxpayers' money being wined & dined by the owners of "Despite my views about the value to society of greater publicity for the affairs of corporations, there was an occasion, near the close of 1910, when I was as secretive-indeed as furtive-as any conspirator
I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to
The secrecy was well warranted. At stake was control over the entire economy. Senator Aldrich had issued confidential invitations to Henry P. Davison of J.P. Morgan & Company; Frank A. Vanderlip, President of the Rockefeller-owned National City Bank; A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; Benjamin Strong of Morgan's Bankers Trust Company; & Paul Warburg. They were all to accompany him to
At
"After a general discussion it was decided to draw up certain broad principles on which all could agree. Every member of the group voted for a central bank as being the ideal cornerstone for any banking system." (p.399)
Warburg stressed that the name "central bank" must be avoided at all costs. It was decided to promote the scheme as a "regional reserve" system with 4 (later 12) branches in different sections of the country. The conspirators knew that the NY bank would dominate the rest, which would be marble "white elephants" to deceive the public.
Out of the
When the Aldrich Bill could not be pushed through Congress, a new strategy had to be devised. The Republican Party was too closely connected with Wall Street. The only hope for a central bank was to disguise it & have it put through by the Democrats as a measure to strip Wall Street of its power. The opportunity to do this came with the approach of the 1912 Presidential election. Republican President William Howard Taft, who had turned against the Aldrich Bill, seemed a sure-fire bet for reelection until Taft's predecessor, fellow Republican Teddy Roosevelt, agreed to run on the ticket of the Progressive Party. In America's 60 Families, Ferdinand Lundberg acknowledges:
"As soon as
Perkins & J.P. Morgan & Company were the substance of the Progressive Party; everything else was trimming.
In short, most of
The Democrat candidate, Woodrow Wilson, was equally the property of Morgan. Dr. Gabriel Kolko in his The Triumph of Conservatism, reports: "In late 1907 he [Wilson] supported the Aldrich Bill on banking, & was full of praise for Morgan's role in American society." (p.205) According to Lundberg: "For nearly 20 years before his nomination Woodrow Wilson had moved in the shadow of Wall Street." (p.112)
Woodrow Wilson & Teddy Roosevelt proceeded to whistle-stop the country trying to out-do each other in florid (& hypocritical) denunciations of the Wall Street "money trust" -- the same group of Insiders which was financing the campaigns of both.
Dr. Kolko goes on to tell us that, at the beginning of 1912, banking reform "seemed a dead issue… The banking reform movement had neatly isolated itself."
The Insiders' sheepdog who controlled
In his The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, Professor Charles Seymour refers to the "Colonel" as the "unseen guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act.
In order to support the fiction that the Federal Reserve Act was "a people's bill," the Insider financiers put up a smoke-screen of opposition to it. It was strictly a case of Br'er Rabbit begging not to be thrown into the briar patch. Both Aldrich & Vanderlip denounced what in actuality was their own bill. Nearly 25 years later Frank Vanderlip admitted: "Now although the Aldrich Federal Reserve Plan was defeated when it bore the name Aldrich, nevertheless its essential points were all contained in the plan that finally was adopted."
Taking advantage of Congress' desire to adjourn for Christmas, the Federal Reserve Act was passed on 22Dec13 by a vote of 298-to-60 in the House, & in the Senate by a majority of 43-to-25.
There was genuine opposition to the Act, but it could not match the power of the bill's advocates. Conservative Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. proclaimed with great foresight, "The bill as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of currency… I do not like to think that any law can be passed which will make it possible to submerge the gold standard in a flood of irredeemable paper currency." (Congressional Record, 10Jun32.) After the vote, Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr., father of the famous aviator, told Congress:
"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth… When the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized…
This is the Aldrich Bill in disguise…
The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation…
The Federal Reserve Act was, & still is, hailed as a victory of "democracy" over the "money trust." Nothing could be farther from the truth.
The whole central bank concept was engineered by the very group it was supposed to strip of power. The myth that the "money trust" had been defrocked should have been exploded when Paul Warburg was appointed to the first Federal Reserve Board -- a board which was handpicked by "Colonel" House. Paul Warburg relinquished his $500,000-a-year job as a Kuhn, Loeb partner to take a $12,000-a-year job with the Federal Reserve. The "accidentalists" who teach in our universities would have you believe that he did it because be was a "public-spirited citizen." And the man who served as Chairman of the NY Federal Reserve Bank during its early critical years was the same Benjamin Strong of the Morgan interests, who accompanied Warburg, Davison, Vanderlip et al. to
How powerful is our "central bank?" The Federal Reserve controls our money supply & interest rates, & thereby manipulates the entire economy -- creating inflation or deflation, recession or boom, & sending the stock market up or down at whim. The Federal Reserve is so powerful that Congressman Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, maintains:
"In the
Neither Presidents, Congressmen nor Secretaries of the Treasury direct the Federal Reserve! In the matters of money, the Federal Reserve directs them! The uncontrolled power of the "Fed" was admitted by Secretary of the Treasury David M. Kennedy in an interview for the 5May69, issue of U.S. News & World Report:
"Q: Do you approve of the latest credit-tightening moves?
A: It's not my job to approve or disapprove. It is the action of the
Federal Reserve."
Prof. Carroll Quigley of
Harvard, Princeton & Georgetown Universities wrote book disclosing
international bankers' plan to control the world from behind the political
& financial scenes. Quigley revealed plans of billionaires to establish
dictatorship of the super-rich disguised as workers' democracies.J.P. Morgan created artificial panic used as excuse to pass Federal Reserve Act Morgan was instrumental in pushing
And, curiously enough, the Federal Reserve System has never been audited & has firmly resisted all attempts by House Banking Committee Chairman Wright Patman to have it audited. (NYT, 14Sept67.)
How successful has the Federal Reserve System been? It depends on your point of view. Since Woodrow Wilson took his oath of office, the national debt has risen from $1 billion to $455 billion The total amount of interest paid since then to the international bankers holding that debt is staggering, with interest having become the third largest item in the federal budget. Interest on the national debt is now $22 billion every year, & climbing steeply as inflation pushes up the interest rate on government bonds. Meanwhile, our gold is mortgaged to European central banks, & our silver has all been sold. With economic catastrophe imminent, only a blind disciple of the "accidental theory of history" could believe that all of this has occurred by coincidence.
When the Federal Reserve System was foisted on an unsuspecting American public, there were absolute guarantees that there would be no more boom & bust economic cycles. The men who, behind the scenes, were pushing the central bank concept for the international bankers faithfully promised that from then on there would be only steady growth & perpetual prosperity. However, Congressman Charles A. Lindberg Sr. accurately proclaimed:
"From now on depressions will be scientifically created."
Using a central bank to create alternate periods of inflation & deflation, & thus whipsawing the public for vast profits, had been worked out by the international bankers to an exact science.
Having built the Federal Reserve as a tool to consolidate & control wealth, the international bankers were now ready to make a major killing. Between 1923-29, the Federal Reserve expanded (inflated) the money supply by 62%. Much of this new money was used to bid the stock market up to dizzying heights.
At the same time that enormous amounts of credit money were being made available, the mass media began to ballyhoo tales of the instant riches to be made in the stock market. According to Ferdinand Lundberg:
"For profits to be made on these funds the public had to be induced to speculate, & it was so induced by misleading newspaper accounts, many of them bought & paid for by the brokers that operated the pools…"
The House Hearings on Stabilization of the Purchasing Power of the Dollar disclosed evidence in 1928 that the Federal Reserve Board was working closely with the heads of European central banks. The Committee warned that a major crash had been planned in 1927. At a secret luncheon of the Federal Reserve Board & heads of the European central banks, the committee warned, the international bankers were tightening the noose.
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, came to
On October 24, the feathers hit the fan. Writing in The US' Unresolved Monetary & Political Problems, William Bryan describes what happened:
"When everything was ready, the NY financiers started calling 24-hour broker-call loans. This meant that the stockbrokers & the customers had to dump their stock on the market in order to pay the loans. This naturally collapsed the stock market & brought a banking collapse all over the country because the banks not owned by the oligarchy were heavily involved in broker-call claims at this time, & bank runs soon exhausted their coin & currency & they had to close. The Federal Reserve System would not come to their aid, although they were instructed under the law to maintain an elastic currency."
The investing public, including most stock brokers & bankers, took a horrendous blow in the Crash, but not the Insiders. They were either out of the market or had sold "short" so that they made enormous profits as the Dow Jones plummeted. For those who knew the score, a comment by Paul Warburg had provided the warning to sell. That signal came on 9Mar29, when the Financial Chronicle quoted Warburg as giving this sound advice:
"If orgies of unrestricted speculation are permitted to spread too far, the ultimate collapse is certain … to bring about a general depression involving the whole country."
Sharpies were later able to buy back these stocks at a 90% discount from their former prices.
To think that the scientifically engineered Crash of '29 was an accident or the result of stupidity defies all logic. The international bankers who promoted the inflationary policies & pushed the propaganda which pumped up the stock market represented too many generations of accumulated expertise to have blundered into "the great depression."
Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking & Currency Committee, commented:
"It [the Depression] was not accidental. It was a carefully-contrived occurrence… The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as the rulers of us all."
Although we have not had another depression of the magnitude of that which followed 1929, we have since suffered regular recessions. Each of these has followed a period in which the Federal Reserve tromped down hard on the money accelerator & then slammed on the brakes. Since 1929 the following recessions have been created by such manipulation:
1936-37 — Stock Prices fell 50%;
1948 — Stock prices dropped 16%;
1953 — Stock declined 13%;
1956-57 — The market dipped 13%;
1957 — Late in the year the market plunged 19%;
1960 — The market was off 17%;
1966 — Stock prices plummeted 25%;
1970 — The market plunged over 25%.
Chart 5, based on one
appearing in the highly respected financial publication, Indicator Digest
of 24Jun69, shows the effects on the Dow-Jones Industrial Average of Federal
Reserve policies of expanding or restricting the monetary supply. This is how
the stock market is manipulated & how depressions or recessions are
scientifically created. If you have inside knowledge as to which way the
Federal Reserve policy is going to go, you can make a ton of money.The members of the Federal Reserve Board are appointed by the President for 14-year terms. Since these positions control the entire economy of the country they are far more important than cabinet positions, but who has ever heard of any of them except possibly Chairman Arthur Burns? These appointments which should be extensively debated by the Senate are routinely approved. But, here, as in
And, Professor Quigley reveals that these international bankers who owned & controlled the Banks of
The end result, if the Insiders have their way, will be the dream of Montagu Norman of the Bank of England "that the Hegemony of World Finance should reign supreme over everyone, everywhere, as one whole super-national control mechanism." (Montagu Norman by John Hargrave, Greystone Press, N.Y., 1942.)
4. BANKROLLING THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
The establishing of the
Federal Reserve System provided the "conspiracy" with an instrument
whereby the international bankers could run the national debt up to the sky,
thereby collecting enormous amounts of interest & also gaining control over
the borrower. During the Wilson Administration alone, the national debt expanded
800%.Two months prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the conspirators had created the mechanism to collect the funds to pay the interest on the national debt. That mechanism was the progressive income tax, the second plank of Karl Marx' Communist Manifesto which contained ten planks for SOCIALIZING a country.
One quite naturally assumes that the graduated income tax would be opposed by the wealthy. The fact is that many of the wealthiest Americans supported it. Some, no doubt, out of altruism & because, at first, the taxes were very small. But others backed the scheme because they already had a plan for permanently avoiding both the income tax & the subsequent inheritance tax.
What happened was this: At the turn of the century the Populists, a group of rural socialists, were gaining strength & challenging the power of the NY bankers & monopolist industrialists. While the Populists had the wrong answers, they asked many of the right questions. Unfortunately, they were led to believe that the banker-monopolist control over government, which they opposed, was a product of free enterprise.
Since the Populist threat to the cartelists was from the Left (there being no organized political movement for laissez-faire), the Insiders moved to capture the Left. Professor Quigley discloses that over 50 years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Leftwing political movement in the
"What made it decisively important this time was the combination of its adoption by the dominant Wall Street financier, at a time when tax policy was driving all financiers to seek tax-exempt refuges for their fortunes…" (p.938)
Radical movements are never successful unless they attract big money and/or outside support. The great historian of the 20th century, Oswald Spengler, was one of those who saw what American Liberals refuse to see that the Left is controlled by its alleged enemy, the malefactors of great wealth. He wrote in his monumental Decline of the West (Modern Library, NY, 1945):
"There is no proletarian, not even a Communist, movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, in the direction indicated by money, & for the time being permitted by money -- & that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact."
While the Populist movement was basically non-conspiratorial, its Leftist ideology & platform were made to order for the elitist Insiders because it aimed at concentrating power in government. The insiders knew they could control that power & use it to their own purposes. They were not, of course, interested in promoting competition but in restricting it. Professor Gabriel Kolko has prepared a lengthy volume presenting the undeniable proof that the giant corporate manipulators promoted much of the so-called "progressive legislation" of the Roosevelt & Wilson eras -- legislation which ostensibly was aimed at controlling their abuses, but which was so written as to suit their interests. In The Triumph of Conservatism (by which Kolko mistakenly means big business), he notes:
“the significant reason for many businessmen welcoming & working to increase federal intervention into their affairs has been virtually ignored by historians & economists. The oversight was due to the illusion that American industry was centralized & monopolized to such an extent that it could rationalize the activity [regulate production & prices] in its various branches voluntarily. Quite the opposite was true. Despite the large numbers of mergers, & the growth in the absolute size of many corporations, the dominant tendency in the American economy at the beginning of this century was toward growing competition. Competition was unacceptable to many key business & financial interests…"
The best way for the Insiders to eliminate this growing Competition was to impose a progressive income tax on their competitors while writing the laws so as to include built-in escape hatches for themselves. Actually, very few of the proponents of the graduated income tax realized they were playing into the hands of those they were seeking to control. As Ferdinand Lundberg notes in The Rich & The Super-Rich:
"What it [the income tax] became, finally, was a siphon gradually inserted into the pocketbooks of the general public. Imposed to popular huzzas as a class tax, the income tax was gradually turned into a mass tax in a jujitsu turnaround
The Insiders' principal mouthpiece in the Senate during this period was Nelson Aldrich, one of the conspirators involved in engineering the creation of the Federal Reserve & the maternal grandfather of Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller. Lundberg says that "When Aldrich spoke, newsmen understood that although the words were his, the dramatic line was surely approved by 'Big John [D. Rockefeller]… '" In earlier years Aldrich had denounced the income tax as "communistic & socialistic," but in 1909 he pulled a dramatic & stunning reversal. The American Biographical Dictionary comments:
"Just when the opposition had become formidable he [Aldrich] took the wind out of its sails by bringing forward, with the support of the President [Taft], a proposed amendment to the Constitution empowering Congress to lay income taxes."
Howard Hinton records in his biography of Cordell Hull that Congressman Hull, who had been pushing in the House for the income tax, wrote this stunned observation:
"During the past few weeks the unexpected spectacle of certain so-called 'old-line conservative' [sic] Republican leaders in Congress suddenly reversing their attitude of a lifetime & seemingly espousing, through ill-concealed reluctance, the proposed income-tax amendment to the Constitution has been the occasion of universal surprise & wonder."
The escape hatch for the Insiders to avoid paying taxes was ready. By the time the Amendment had been approved by the states (even before the income-tax was passed), the Rockefellers & Carnegie foundations were in full operation.
One must remember that it was to break up the Standard Oil (Rockefeller) & U.S. Steel (Carnegie) monopolies that the various anti-trust acts were ostensibly passed. These monopolists could now compound their wealth tax-free while competitors had to face a graduated income tax which made it difficult to amass capital. As we have said, socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, as the socialists would like you to believe, but a consolidate-&-control-the-wealth program for the Insiders. The Reece Committee which investigated foundations for Congress in 1953 proved with an overwhelming amount of evidence that the various Rockefeller & Carnegie foundations have been promoting socialism since their inception. (See Rene Wormser's Foundations: Their Power & Influence, Devin Adair, NY, 1958.)
The conspirators now had created the mechanisms to run up the debt, to collect the debt, & (for themselves) to avoid the taxes required to pay the yearly interest on the debt. Then all that was needed was a reason to escalate the debt. Nothing runs up a national debt like a war. And WWI was being brewed in
In 1916, Woodrow Wilson was re-elected by a hair. He had based his campaign on the slogan: "He Kept Us Out of War!" The American public was extremely opposed to
While all of the standard reasons given for the outbreak of WWI in
The assassination of an Austrian Archduke was merely an incident providing an excuse for starting a chain reaction.
After years of fighting, the war was a complete stalemate & would have ended almost immediately in a negotiated settlement (as had most other European conflicts) had not the
As soon as
In order to generate war fever, the sinking of the
Submarine warfare was a phony issue.
The
During the "war to end all wars," Insider banker Bernard Baruch was made absolute dictator over American business when President Wilson appointed him Chairman of the War Industries Board, where he had control of all domestic contracts for Allied war materials. Baruch made lots of friends while placing tens of billions in government contracts, & it was widely rumored in Wall Street that out of the war to make the world safe for international bankers he netted $200 million for himself.
"Colonel" House (l) was front man for the International banking fraternity. He manipulated President Woodrow Wilson (r) like a puppet.
German born International financier Paul Warburg masterminded establishment of Federal Reserve to put control over nation's economy in hands of international bankers. The Federal Reserve controls the money supply which allows manipulators to create alternate cycles of boom & bust, i.e., a roller coaster economy. This allows those in the know to make fabulous amounts of money, but even more important, allows the Insiders to control the economy & further centralize power in the federal government.
While Insider banker Paul Warburg controlled the Federal Reserve, & international banker Bernard Baruch placed government contracts, international banker Eugene Meyer, a former partner of Baruch & the son of a partner in the Rothschilds' international banking house of Lazard Freres, was Wilson's choice to head the War Finance Corporation, where he too made a little money.*
(*Meyer later gained control of the highly influential Washington Post which became known as the "
It should be noted that Sir William Wiseman, the man sent by British Intelligence to help bring the
WWI was a financial bonanza for the international bankers. But it was a catastrophe of such magnitude for the
The Bolshevik Revolution in
Most people today believe the Communists were successful in
In the
The year is 1917. The Allies are fighting the Central Powers. The Allies include
But where were Lenin & Trotsky when all this was taking place? Lenin was in
Lenin was sent across
The Germans, on the face of it, had a plausible excuse for financing Lenin & Trotsky. The 2 Germans most responsible for the financing of Lenin were Max Warburg & a displaced Russian named Alexander Helphand. They could claim that they were serving their country's cause by helping & financing Lenin. However, these 2 German "patriots" neglected to mention to the Kaiser their plan to foment a Communist revolution in
For the father-in-law of Max Warburg's brother, Felix, was Jacob Schiff, senior partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (Paul & Felix Warburg, you will recall, were also partners in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. while Max ran the Rothschild-allied family bank of Frankfurt.) Jacob Schiff also helped finance Leon Trotsky. According to the NY Journal-American of 3Feb49: "Today it is estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in
One of the best sources of information on the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution is Czarism & the Revolution by an important White Russian General named Arsene de Goulevitch who was founder in
"The main purveyors of funds for the revolution, however, were neither the crackpot Russian millionaires nor the armed bandits of Lenin. The 'real' money primarily came from certain British & American circles which for a long time past had lent their support to the Russian revolutionary cause…
De Goulevitch continues:
"The important part played by the wealthy American banker, Jacob Schiff, in the events in
General Alexander Nechvolodov is quoted by de Goulevitch as stating in his book on the Bolshevik Revolution:
"In Apr17, Jacob Schiff publicly declared that it was thanks to his financial support that the revolution in
Chart 6
FINANCING THE
BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
Paul
Warburg Max Warburg
$6,000,000
Jacob
Schiff Col. House
$20,000,000
N.E.P.
TROTSKY Hitler
LENIN
$5,000,000
Harriman
Alfred Milner
Rockefeller
Rothschild
Vanderlip
J.P. MORGAN & CO
ROCKEFELLERS
Schiff spent millions to
overthrow the Czar & more millions to overthrow Kerensky. He was sending
money to According to de Goulevitch:
"Mr. Bakhmetiev, the late Russian Imperial Ambassador to the
Schiff's participation in the Bolshevik Revolution, though quite naturally now denied, was well known among Allied intelligence services at the time. This led to much talk about Bolshevism being a Jewish plot. The result was that the subject of financing the Communist takeover of
Still another important financier of the Bolshevik Revolution was an extremely wealthy Englishman named Lord Alfred Milner, the organizer & head of a secret organization called "The Round Table" Group which was backed by Lord Rothschild (discussed in the next chapter).
De Goulevitch notes further:
"On 7Apr17, General Janin made the following entry in his diary ('Au G.C.C. Russe" - At Russian G.H.Q. - Le Monde Slave, Vol.2, 1927, pp.296-297): Long interview with R., who confirmed what I had previously been told by M. After referring to the German hatred of himself & his family, he turned to the subject of the Revolution which, he claimed, was engineered by the English and, more precisely, by Sir George Buchanan & Lord (Alfred) Milner.
De Goulevitch goes on to reveal: "In private interviews I have been told that over 21 million roubles were spent by Lord Milner in financing the Russian Revolution."
It should be noted parenthetically that Lord Milner, Paul, Felix & Max Warburg represented "their" respective countries at the Paris Peace Conference at the conclusion of WWI.
If we can somehow ascribe Max Warburg's financing of Lenin to German "patriotism," it was certainly not "patriotism" which inspired Schiff, Morgan, Rockefeller & Milner to bankroll the Bolsheviks. Both
… Hagedorn, Herman, The Magnate,
In the Bolshevik Revolution we see many of the same old faces that were responsible for; creating the Federal Reserve System, initiating the graduated income tax, setting up the tax-free foundations & pushing us into WWI. However, if you conclude that this is anything but coincidental, your name will be immediately expunged from the Social Register.
No revolution can be successful without organization & money. "The downtrodden masses" usually provide little of the former & none of the latter. But Insiders at the top can arrange for both.
What did these people possibly have to gain in financing the Russian Revolution? What did they have to gain by keeping it alive & afloat, or, during the 1920's by pouring millions of dollars into what Lenin called his New Economic Program, thus saving the Soviets from collapse?
Why would these "capitalists" do all this? If your goal' is global conquest, you have to start somewhere. It may or may not have been coincidental, but
In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some of the world's richest & most powerful men financing a movement which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping of their wealth men like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans, & Milners. But obviously these men have no fear of international Communism. It is only logical to assume that if they financed it & do not fear it, it must be because they control it. Can there be any other explanation that makes sense? Remember that for over 150 years it has been standard operating procedure of the Rothschilds & their allies to control both sides of every conflict. You must have an "enemy" if you are going to collect from the King. The East-West balance-of-power politics is used as one of the main excuses for the socialization of
Lord Alfred Milner, wealthy English man & frontman for the Rothschilds, served as paymaster for the International bankers in
According to his grandson John, Jacob Schiff long-time associate of the Rothschilds, financed the Communist Revolution in
Home of the CFR on
[NOTE BY DOCUMENT CONVERTER, THIS (ABOVE) IS A SHOT OF THE BACK COVER OF THE C.F.R’S ANUUAL REPORT, 1997] www.foreignrelations.org
We can only theorize on the manner in which
We do know this, however. A clique of American financiers not only helped establish Communism in
At
None of the foregoing makes sense if Communism really is what the Communists & the Establishment tell us it is. But if Communism is an arm of a bigger conspiracy to control the world by power-mad billionaires (& brilliant but ruthless academicians who have shown them how to use their power) it all becomes perfectly logical.
It is at this point that we should again make it clear that this conspiracy is not made up solely of bankers & international cartelists, but includes every field of human endeavor. Starting with Voltaire & Adam Weishaupt & running through John Ruskin, Sidney Webb, Nicholas Murray Butler, & on to the present with Henry Kissinger & John Kenneth Galbraith, it has always been the scholar looking for avenues of power who has shown the "sons of the very powerful" how their wealth could be used to rule the world.
We cannot stress too greatly the importance of the reader keeping in mind that this book is discussing only one segment of the conspiracy, certain international bankers. Other equally important segments which work to foment labor, religious & racial strife in order to promote socialism have been described in numerous other books. These other divisions of the conspiracy operate independently of the international bankers in most cases & it would certainly be disastrous to ignore the danger to our freedom they represent.
It would be equally disastrous to lump all businessmen & bankers into the conspiracy. One must draw the distinction between competitive free enterprise, the most moral & productive system ever devised, & cartel capitalism dominated by industrial monopolists & international bankers. The difference is the private enterpriser operates by offering products & services in a competitive free market while the cartel capitalist uses the government to force the public to do business with him. These corporate socialists are the deadly enemies of competitive private enterprise.
Liberals are willing to believe that these "robber barons" will fix prices, rig markets, establish monopolies, buy politicians, exploit employees & fire them the day before they are eligible for pensions, but they absolutely will not believe that these same men would want to rule the world or would use Communism as the striking edge of their conspiracy. When one discusses the machinations of these men, Liberals usually respond by saying, "But don't you think they mean well?"
However, if you think with logic, reason & precision in this field & try to expose these power seekers, the Establishment's mass media will accuse you of being a dangerous paranoid who is "dividing" our people. In every other area, of course, they encourage dissent as being healthy in a "democracy."
5. ESTABLISHING THE ESTABLISHMENT
One of the primary reasons
the Insiders worked behind the scenes to foment WWI was to create in
its aftermath a world government. If you wish to establish national monopolies,
you must control national governments. If you wish to establish international
monopolies or cartels, you must control a world government.After the Armistice on 11Nov18, Woodrow Wilson & his alter ego, "Colonel" House (the ever present front man for the Insiders), went to Europe in hopes of establishing a world government in the form of the
Americans certainly didn't want to get into a World Government with double-dealing Europeans whose specialty was secret treaty hidden behind secret treaty. The guest of honor, so to speak, stalked out of the banquet before the poisoned meal could be served. And, without American inclusion, there could be no meaningful World Government.
Aroused public opinion made it obvious that the U.S. Senate dared not ratify a treaty saddling the country with such an internationalist commitment. In some manner the American public had to be sold on the idea of internationalism & World Government. Again, the key was "Colonel" House.
House had set down his political ideas in his book called Philip Dru: Administrator in 1912. In this book House laid out a thinly-fictionalized plan for conquest of
In 1919 House met in
The Round Table organization in
"In the middle 1890's Rhodes had a personal income of at least a £1 million sterling a year (then about $5 million) which he spent so freely for his mysterious purposes that he was usually overdrawn on his account…"
Cecil Rhodes' commitment to a conspiracy to establish World Government was set down in a series of wills described by Frank Aydelotte in his book American
"The 7 wills which Cecil Rhodes made between the ages of 24-46 [
In his first will
The 'Confession of Faith' enlarges upon these ideas. The model for this proposed secret society was the Society of Jesus, though he mentions also the Masons."
It should be noted that the originator of this type of secret society was Adam Weishaupt, the monster who founded the Order of Illuminati on May 1, 1776, for the purpose of conspiracy to control the world. The role of Weishaupt's Illuminists in such horrors as the Reign of Terror is unquestioned, & the techniques of the Illuminati have long been recognized as models for Communist methodology. Weishaupt also used the structure of the Society of Jesus (the Jesuits) as his model, & rewrote his Code in Masonic terms. Aydelotte continues:
"In 1888
Apparently for strategic reasons, Lord Rothschild was subsequently removed from the forefront of the scheme. Professor Quigley reveals that Lord Rosebury "replaced his father-in-law, Lord Rothschild, in Rhodes' secret group & was made a Trustee under
The "secret society" was organized on the conspiratorial pattern of circles within circles. Professor Quigley informs us that the central part of the "secret society" was established by March, 1891, using
"At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system [the Round Table Group] had to be greatly extended. Once again the task was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in
Joseph Kraft (CFR), however, tells us in Harper's of Jul58, that the chief agent in the formal founding of the Council on Foreign Relations was "Colonel" House, supported by such proteg6s as Walter Lippmann, John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles & Christian Herter. It was House who acted as host for the Round Table Group, both English & American, at the key meeting of 19May19, in the Majestic Hotel, Paris, which committed the conspiracy to creation of the CFR.
Although Quigley stresses the importance of Morgan men at the creation of the organization known as the Council on Foreign Relations, this organization's own materials & "Colonel" House's own memoirs reveal his function as midwife at the birth of the C.F.R.
The CFR's Twenty-Fifth Annual Report tells us this of the CFR's founding at
The
Later the plan was changed to create an ostensible autonomy because, "… it seemed unwise to set up a single institute with branches." It had to be made to appear that the CFR in
According to Quigley, the most important financial dynasties in
The CFR has come to be known as "The Establishment," "the invisible government" & "the Rockefeller foreign office." This semi-secret organization unquestionably has become the most influential group in
One of the extremely infrequent articles to appear in the national press concerning this Council was published in the Christian Science Monitor of 1Sept61. It began this way:
"On the west side of fashionable
Although the formal membership in the CFR is composed of close to 1,500 of the most elite names in the worlds of government, labor, business, finance, communications, the foundations, & the academy -- & despite the fact that it has staffed almost every key position of every administration since those of FDR -- it is doubtful that one American in 1,000 so much as recognizes the Council's name, or that one in 10,000 can relate anything at all about its structure or purpose. Indicative of the CFR's power to maintain its anonymity is the fact that, despite its having been operative at the highest levels for nearly 50 years & having from the beginning counted among its members the foremost lions of the Establishment communications media, we discovered after poring over volumes of the Readers' Guide To Periodical Literature covering several decades that only one magazine article on the CFR has ever appeared in a major national journal -- & that in Harper's, hardly a mass-circulation periodical. Similarly, only a handful of articles on the Council have appeared in the nation's great newspapers. Such anonymity -- at that level -- can hardly be a matter of mere chance.
What makes this secret organization so influential? No one who knows for a certainty will say. The Christian Science Monitor, which is edited by a member of the American Round Table (a branch of Milner's secret society) did not in the article of 1Sept61, that "its roster … contains names distinguished in the field of diplomacy, government, business, finance, science, labor, journalism, law & education. What united so wide ranging & disparate a membership is a passionate concern for the direction of American foreign policy."
The Christian Science Monitor indicates the fantastic power the C.F.R. has had during the last 6 administrations:
"Because of the Council's single-minded dedication to studying & deliberating American foreign policy, there is a constant flow of its members from private' to public service. Almost half of the Council members have been invited to assume official government positions or to act as consultants at one time or another." [Emphasis added]
The policies promoted by the CFR in the fields of defense & international relations become, with a regularity which defies the laws of chance, the official policies of the US Government. As Liberal columnist Joseph Kraft, himself a member of the CFR, noted of the Council in the Harper's article: "It has been the seat of some basic government decisions, has set the context for many more, & has repeatedly served as a recruiting ground for ranking officials." Kraft, incidentally, aptly titled his article on the CFR, "School for Statesmen -- an admission that the members of the Council are drilled with a "line" of strategy to be carried out in
As WWII approached, the Round Table Group was influential in seeing that Hitler was not stopped in
With the Round Table doing its work in Europe, the C.F.R. carried the ball in the
"With the outbreak of war in Europe it was clear that the
[After
This is the group which designed the UN ... the first major successful step on the road to a
"Great popular support & enthusiasm for the UN policies should be built up, well organized & fully articulate. But it is also necessary to do more than that. The opposition must be rendered so impotent that it will be unable to gather any significant support in the Senate against the UN Charter & the treaties which will follow."
One wonders if the boobs at the Party level ever questioned why they were to support an organization dominated by the hated "Wall Street" personalities. The landscape painters of the mass media have outdone themselves painting the U.N. as a peace organization instead of a front for the international bankers.
Not only did members of the CFR dominate the establishment of the UN, but CFR members were at the elbow of the American President at Teheran,
So completely has the CFR dominated the State Department over the past 38 years that every Secretary of State except Cordell Hull, James Byrnes, & William Rogers has been a member of the CFR. While
Today the CFR remains active in working toward its final goal of a government over all the world -- a government which the Insiders & their allies will control. The goal of the CFR is simply to abolish the
The reason is evident to those who have studied its membership for this little known semi-secret organization to be called "the Establishment." (See Chart 7) International banking organizations that currently have men in the CFR include Kuhn, Loeb & Company; Lazard Freres (directly affiliated with Rothschild); Dillon Read; Lehman Bros.; Goldman, Sachs; Chase Manhattan Bank; Morgan Guaranty Bank; Brown Bros. Harriman; First National City Bank; Chemical Bank & Trust, & Manufacturers Hanover Trust Bank.
Among the major corporations that have men in the
Chart 7
WORLD SUPRA-GOVERNMENT
RothschiId
Schiff
Milnar Foundations
Warburg
Vanderlip
Roundtable• Rockefeller
Rockefeller
Ford
Baruch
Carnegie
Morgan
R.I.I.A
Executive
Department
C.F.R.
Kuhn
Loeb
Lazard
Freres
Dillon,
Rand Standard Oil NBC, CBS, Rand
Lehman
Bros. IBM Time, Life Hudson Institute
Goldman,
Sachs Xerox Fortune, Look Fund for Republic
Chase
Manhattan Eastman Kodak Newsweek Brookings Institute
New
York Times
Morgan
Guaranty Pan American Washington Post
Firestone
LA Times Lovestone
McGraw-Hill
Reuther
Simon
& Shuster
L.I.D.
Book of the Month
U.W.F.
Saturday Review
Business
Week
CFR are Standard Oil, IBM, Xerox, Eastman Kodak, Pan American,
Firestone, U. S. Steel, General Electric & AT&T Company.Also in the CFR are men from such openly Leftist organizations as the Fabian Socialist Americans for Democratic Action, the avowedly Socialist League for Industrial Democracy (formerly the Intercollegiate Socialist Society), & the United World Federalists which openly advocates world government with the Communists. Such devotedly Socialist labor leaders as the late Walter Reuther, David Dubinsky & Jay Lovestone have also been members of the CFR. In theory, these men & organizations are supposed to be the blood enemies of the banks & businesses listed above. Yet they all belong to the same lodge. You can see why that fact is not advertised.
The CFR is totally interlocked with the major foundations & so-called "Think Tanks." Included in the interlock are the Rockefeller, Ford & Carnegie foundations & the Rand Corporation, Hudson Institute, Fund for the Republic & Brookings Institute "Think Tanks."
The fact that the CFR operates in near-complete anonymity can hardly be accidental. Among the communications corporations represented in the C.F.R. are NBC, CBS, Time, Life, Fortune, Look, Newsweek, NYT, Washington Post, LA Times, NY Post, Denver Post, Louisville Courier Journal, Minneapolis Tribune, the Knight papers, McGraw-Hill, Simon & Schuster, Harper Bros., Random House, Little Brown & Co., Macmillan Co., Viking Press, Saturday Review, Business Week & Book of the Month Club. Surely the CFR could get a few blurbs of publicity if publicity were desired. If it seems impossible that one entity could control such a vast array of firms, it is because most people do not know that the so-called founders of such giants as the NYT & NBC were chosen, financed & directed by Morgan, Schiff & their allies. The case of Adolph Ochs of the Times & David Sarnoff of RCA are examples of this control. Both were given early financial aid by Kuhn, Loeb & Company & Morgan Guaranty.
These are the Establishment's official landscape painters whose jobs it is to make sure the public does not discover the CFR & its role in creating a world socialist dictatorship.
You will recall that "Colonel" House believed we should have 2 political parties but only a single ideology — One World socialism. This is exactly what we have in this country today. (See Chart 8) Although there are philosophical differences between the grass roots Democrats & the grass roots Republicans, yet as you move up the party ladders these differences become less & less distinguishable until finally the ladders disappear behind the Establishment's managed news curtain & come together at the apex under the control of the CFR. In 1968, when George Wallace maintained that there wasn't a dime's worth of difference between the 2 parties, he may not have known how right he was or why.
Chart 8
CONTROL OF POLITICAL PARTIES
Democrats Republicans
Dean Acheson CFR Dwight Eisenhower
Alger Hiss
John Foster Dulles
Adlai
Stevenson Managed News Curtain Thomas
E. Dewey
John Kennedy
Jacob Javits
Edward Kennedy
Paul Hoffman
Robert Kennedy
Robert McNamara
Averell
Harriman John Gardner
George Ball
Henry Cabot Lodge
Henry Fowler
Rockefellers
Dean Rusk
Elliot Richardson
Adam
Yarmolinsky Arthur Burns
John K.
Galbraith Henry Kissinger
Arthur
Schlesinger, Jr. Richard Nixon
Hubert Humphrey
John Lindsay
Democrat RepublicanThe following are so-called Democrats who have been or now are CFR agents: Dean Acheson, Alger Hiss, Adlai Stevenson, John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Edward Kennedy,* Averell Harriman, George Ball, Henry Fowler, Dean Rusk, Adam Yarmolinsky, Hubert Humphrey & John Lindsay.
(*
It is interesting to note that rewards of cushy jobs were given by the international bankers to many men high in the LBJ administration for their services. Undersecretary of State George Ball went with Lehman Brothers; Secretary of the Treasury Henry Fowler was taken in by Goldman, Sachs & Co.; Budget Director Peter Lewis, Undersecretary of the Treasury Frederick Deming & former Secretary of Commerce C.R. Smith all avoided the bread lines by being picked up by Lazard Freres (Rothschilds). Fowler & Deming were largely responsible for policies which led to European nations claiming half of our gold (& having potential claims on the rest) as well as denuding the U.S. Treasury of all of the silver reserves it had built up over a century of time. Did the international bankers take pity on these men for their incompetence or were they rewarded for a job well done?
Controlling the Republican Party for the CFR have been Dwight D. Eisenhower, John Foster Dulles, Thomas E. Dewey, Jacob Javits, Robert McNamara, Henry Cabot Lodge, Paul Hoffman, John Gardner, the Rockefeller clan, Elliott Richardson, Arthur Burns, Henry Kissinger & Richard Nixon.* While it is true that every administration since FDR has been dominated by the C.F.R., the Nixon Administration has set the all-time record by appointing over 110 C.F.R. members to key positions. Henry Kissinger, the "Colonel" House of the Nixon Administration, came to his job directly from employment on the CFR staff. Kissinger represents the very opposite of everything Nixon said he stood for in his campaign. Both Liberals & Conservatives admit Kissinger is by far the most important man in the Nixon Administration.
(*Richard Nixon now claims that he no longer belongs to the CFR, having dropped out when the organization became an issue in his primary campaign for the governorship of California in 1962. Nixon has never said why he dropped out, but the fact that he has appointed over 110 CFR members to important positions in his administration speaks for itself. It should come as no surprise that the very same Richard Nixon who campaigned in 1968 as a conservative had already made his real position very clear to the Insiders of the CFR by authoring an article in the CFR magazine, Foreign Affairs, in Oct67. The title of "The members of the Council [On Foreign Relations article, "Asia after Vietnam," revealed how the aspiring President Nixon would open a new policy toward Red China & bring "realism" to our Asian foreign policy. The CFR's Annual Report for 1952, admitted that sometimes members in sensitive positions were forced to go underground & keep the membership secret.)
Administrations, both Democrat & Republican, come & go-but the CFR lingers on. This is why the more things seem to change, the more they remain the same. The fix is in at the top, where the same coterie of Insiders, bent on control of the world, runs the show. As Professor Quigley admits:
"There does exist, & has existed for a generation, an international… network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists or any other groups, & frequently does so." [Emphasis added.)
Yes, the Insiders have no aversion to working with the Communists whose ostensible goal is to destroy them. While the Insiders are serving champagne & caviar to their guests in their summer mansions at
Clearly, the
"The members of council [On Foreign Relations] are persons of much more than average influence in their community. They have used the prestige that their wealth, their social position, & their education have given them to lead their country toward bankruptcy & military debacle. They should look at their hands. There is blood on them -- the dried blood of the last war & the fresh blood of the present one [the Korean War] (HUMAN SACRIFICE)
It goes without saying that the CFR's hands are bloodier now with the gore of 50,000 Americans in
It should not be surprising to learn that there is on the international level an organizational equivalent of the CFR. This group calls itself the Bilderbergers. If scarcely one American in 1,000 has any familiarity with the CFR, it is doubtful that one in 5,000 has any knowledge of the Bilderbergers. Again, this is not accidental.
The strange name of this group is taken from the site of the first meeting in May54 -- the Hotel de Bilderberg -- in Oostebeek Holland. The man who created the Bilderbergers is His Royal Highness Prince Bernhard of the
Prince Bernhard's counterpart among the American Bilderbergers is David Rockefeller, chairman of the board of the CFR, whose economic base is the giant Chase Manhattan Bank & Standard Oil. Among the other Bilderbergers from the world of ultra-high finance are Baron Edmund de Rothschild of the House of Rothschild, C. Douglas Dillon (CFR) of Dillon Read & Co., Robert McNamara of the World Bank, Sir Eric Roll of S.G. Warburg & Co., Ltd., Pierce Paul Schweitzer of the IMF, & George Ball (CFR) of Lehman Brothers.
Not everyone who attends one of the Bilderbergers' secret meetings is an Insider, but only men of the Left are allowed to attend the private meetings following the general sessions. The avowedly Socialist Parties of
The Bilderberger Advisory Committee forms an even more inner circle than the Steering Committee. Americans on the Advisory Committee include Joseph E. Johnson, Dean Rusk, Arthur H. Dean, George Nebolsine, John S. Coleman, General Walter Bedell Smith & Henry J. Heinz II. Again, all are members of the CFR.
One would assume (that is, if one had not read this book) that when the world's leading parliamentarians & international tycoons meet to discuss the planning of their various nations' foreign policies, that the news hawks from papers & televisionland would be screaming to high heaven that such an event held in secret makes a mockery of the democratic process. One might expect Walter Cronkite to be thundering in wrath about an elite clique meeting to plan our lives; or the NYT editorialists to be pounding their smoking typewriters, fuming about "the public's right to know." But, of course, the landscape painters merely brush the Bilderbergers right out of existence & focus the public's attention on something like the conditions in the prisons or coke bottles littering the highways. Since the Bilderbergers are a group of the Left (or, as the Liberals in the media might say, but don't, "a group of progressives") they are allowed to go on in peace & quiet planning for 1984. The fact that there is heavy Rockefeller (Chase Manhattan Bank & CFR) influence in the media might also have something to do with the fact that while everybody has heard of, say, The John Birch Society (& almost always in a derogatory manner from the Eastern Establishment media), practically nobody has heard of the Bilderbergers.
Prince Bernhard of the
Edmond & Guy de Rothschild, leaders of the French Rothschild clan. The Rothschilds are closely connected with Prince Bernhard in business (Royal Dutch Shell) & in the building of a one world super government with the Soviets. Time of 20Dec63, says of Guy: "Guy is every inch a Rothschild. He personifies much of what the family name stands for … He is a friend & confidante of some of
As this is written, there have been 29 Bilderberger meetings to date. They usually last 3 days & are held in remote, but plush quarters. The participants are housed in one location & are protected by a thorough security network. Decisions are reached, resolutions adopted, plans of action initiated, but only Bilderbergers ever know for sure what occurred. We must assume that these people did not congregate merely to discuss their golf scores. The press, naturally, is not allowed to be present, although occasionally a brief press conference is held at the end of the meeting at which time the news media are given in very general terms the Bilderberger version of what was discussed. Why all the secrecy if there is really nothing to hide? Why do the Ford, Rockefeller & Carnegie foundations finance the meetings if they are not important? Yes, why?
The most recent meeting took place at Laurance Rockefeller's Woodstock Inn at
"A rather tight lid of secrecy was being kept on the conference… A closed-door meeting was held in
The Woodstock Inn will apparently be sealed up like
When Prince Bernhard arrived at
6. THE ROCKEFELLERS & THE REDS
The most important American
of those "different personages" who run the world from behind the
scenes are the Rockefellers. The Rockefeller clan reportedly has worked with the
Rothschilds & their agents since the 1880's when the original John D.
arranged to get a rebate on every barrel of oil he & his competitors
shipped over Kuhn, Loeb & Co.-controlled Pennsylvania & Baltimore
& Ohio railroads. It has been a profitable partnership ever since,
although there appear to have been areas in which the 2 financial dynasties
competed.The involvement of the Rockefellers with their supposed blood enemies, the Communists, dates back to the Bolshevik Revolution. During the 1920's Lenin established his New Economic Policy (the same name Mr. Nixon applied to his wage-price control package), when the supposedly hated capitalists were invited back into
The Federal Reserve-CFR Insiders began pushing to open up Communist Russia to
The Rockefellers assigned their public relations agent, Ivy Lee, to sell the American public the idea that the Bolsheviks were merely misunderstood idealists who were actually kind benefactors of mankind.
Professor Antony Sutton of Stanford University's Hoover Institution, notes in his highly authoritative Western Technology & Soviet Economic Development:
"Quite predictably, 180 pages later, Lee concludes that the communist problem is merely psychological. By this time he is talking about 'Russians' (not Communists) & concludes 'they are all right.' He suggests the
After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard of
In 1927, Standard Oil of NY built a refinery in
Shortly thereafter Standard Oil of NY & its subsidiary, Vacuum Oil Company, concluded a deal to market Soviet oil in European countries & it was reported that a loan of $75,009,000 to the Bolsheviks was arranged. (
We have been unable to find out if Standard Oil was even theoretically expropriated by the Communists. Sutton writes:
"Only the Danish telegraph concessions, the Japanese fishing, coal & oil concessions, & the Standard Oil lease remained after 1935." (Ibid, Vol.11, p.17.)
Wherever Standard Oil would go, Chase National Bank was sure to follow. (The Rockefeller's Chase Bank was later merged with the Warburg's Manhattan Bank to form the present Chase Manhattan Bank.) In order to rescue the Bolsheviks, who were supposedly an archenemy, the Chase National Bank was instrumental in establishing the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce in 1922. President of the Chamber was Reeve Schley, a vp of Chase National Bank. (Ibid, Vol.11, p.288) According to Professor Sutton: "In 1925, negotiations between Chase & Prombank extended beyond the finance of raw materials & mapped out a complete program for financing Soviet raw material exports to the
The Rockefeller's Chase National Bank also was involved in selling Bolshevik bonds in the
"The Soviet government has been given U.S. Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board & the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank & the Guaranty Trust Company & other banks in NYC.
Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in NY, & of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, & of the State Bank of the
(Congressional Record, 15Jun33.)
But the Rockefellers apparently were not alone in financing the Communist arm of the Insiders' conspiracy. According to Professor Sutton "… there is a report in the State Department files that names Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (the long established & important financial house in NY) as the financier of the First 5-Year Plan. See
Professor Sutton proves conclusively in his 3-volume history of Soviet technological development that the
"Stalin paid tribute to the assistance rendered by the
Remember that this was at a time when the Soviets had already established an extensive spy network in the
Sutton shows that there is hardly a segment of the Soviet economy which is not a result of the transference of Western, particularly American, technology.
This cannot be wholly the result of accident. For 50 years the Federal Reserve-CFR-Rockefeller-Insider crowd has advocated & carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the
What has been true of the past is even more valid today. The leader in promoting the transfer of technology & increasing aid & trade with the Communists is the CFR.
On 7Oct66, President Lyndon Johnson, a man who had appointed a CFR member to virtually every strategic position in his administration, stated:
"We intend to press for legislative authority to negotiate trade agreements which could extend most-favored-nation tariff treatment to European Communist states. We will reduce export controls on East-West trade with respect to hundreds of non-strategic items…
The NYT reported one week later on 13Oct66:
"The US put into effect today one of President Johnson's proposals for stimulating East-West trade by removing restrictions on the export of more than 400 commodities to the Soviet Union & Eastern Europe…
Among the categories from which items have been selected for export relaxation are vegetables, cereals, fodder, hides, crude & manufactured rubber, pulp & waste paper, textiles & textile fibers, crude fertilizers, metal ores & scrap, petroleum, gas & derivatives, chemical compounds & products, dyes, medicines, fireworks, detergents, plastic materials, metal products & machinery, & scientific & professional instruments."
Virtually every one of these "non-strategic" items has a direct or indirect use in war. Later, items such as rifle cleaning compounds, electronic equipment & radar were declared "non-strategic" & cleared for shipment to the
Not surprisingly, the Rockefellers have been leaders in championing this bloody trade. On 16Jan67, one of the most incredible articles ever to appear in a newspaper graced the front page of the Establishment's daily, the NYT. Under the headline "Eaton Joins Rockefellers To Spur Trade With Reds" the article stated:
"An alliance of family fortunes linking Wall Street & the
International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC) is run by Richard Aldrich, grandson of Federal Reserve plotter Nelson Aldrich, & Rodman Rockefeller (CFR), Rocky 5 son. On 20Oct69, IBEC announced that N.M. Rothschild & Sons of
Cyrus Eaton Jr. is the son of the notoriously pro-Soviet Cyrus Eaton, who began his career as secretary to John D. Rockefeller. It is believed that Eaton's rise to power in finance resulted from backing by his mentor. The agreement between Tower International & IBEC continues an old alliance. Although Eaton's name does not appear on the CFR's membership rolls, the Reece Committee which investigated foundations for Congress in 1953, found that Eaton was a secret member.
Among the "non-strategic" items which the Rockefeller-Eaton axis is going to build for the Communists are 10 rubber goods plants, including 2 synthetic rubber plants worth $200 million. Mr. Eaton explains in the Times article: "These people are setting up new automobile plants & know they have got to have tire factories." Under the Nixon Administration which, contrary to campaign promises, has multiplied trade with the Reds tenfold, American concerns are building the world's largest truck factory for the Communists. Trucks are necessary for a nation's war machine & truck factories can be converted to the production of tanks as was done during WWII. The
In addition, the Rockefellers & Eatons are constructing a $50 million aluminum producing plant for the Reds Aluminum for jet planes is considered "non-strategic under Johnson-Nixon doctrine. Even more incredibly, the Times reveals:
Nelson Rockefeller greets Khrushchev, the infamous "Butcher of Budapest." The Rockefeller & Eaton families have now joined forces to build war production plants behind the Iron Curtain so that the Communists can become a bigger threat to
When Communist dictators visit the
"Last month, Tower International reached a tentative agreement with the Soviet patent & licensing organization, Licensintorg, covering future licensing & patent transactions. Until now, Mr. Eaton said, the Russians have left the buying & selling of licenses & patents to the Amtorg Trading Corporation, the official Soviet agency in this country for promoting Soviet-American trade."
This means that the Rockefellers & Eatons have a monopoly on the transfer of technological capability to the supposed enemies of the super-rich, the
"Mr. Eaton acknowledged the difficulties that Amtorg's representatives had encountered here in trying to arrange licensing agreements with American companies. 'As you can imagine,' he said, 'it is almost impossible for a Russian to walk into the research department of an American aerospace company & try to arrange the purchase of a patent'."
Certainly every loyal American will say to himself, "Well, I would hope to God the Soviets couldn't walk into our defense plants & buy a patent." The Rockefellers & the Eatons have solved that problem for the Communists. Now, instead of dealing with an official agency of the Soviet government, American concerns will be dealing with the Rockefellers. Meanwhile, nearly 50,000 Americans have died in
Thus by the purchase of patents for the Communists the Rockefellers are virtually in charge of research & development for the Soviet military machine, allowing the Soviets to mass produce American developments. The transfer of such knowledge is even more important than the sale of weapons. A process that may have taken an American corporation a decade to develop is transferred in toto to the Communists. Does it make sense to spend $75 billion a year on national defense & then deliberately increase the war-making potential of an avowed enemy? It does to Mr. Rockefeller & the Insiders.
Since the Rockefellers have contracted to arrange for patents for the Soviets, they are by dictionary definition Communist agents. Would it not be more accurate to define the Communists as Rockefeller agents?
Indicative of this was a strange event which occurred in Oct64. David Rockefeller, president of the Chase Manhattan Bank & chairman of the board of the CFR, took a vacation in the
For 5 decades the Communists have based their propaganda on the theme that they were going to destroy the Rockefellers & the other super-rich. Yet we find that for 5 decades the Rockefellers have been involved in building the strength of the Soviets. We are supposed to believe those international cartelists do this because they are foolish or greedy. Does this make sense? If a criminal goes up & down the streets shouting at the top of his lungs that as soon as he gets hold of a gun he is going to kill Joe Doaks, & you learn that Doaks is secretly giving guns to the criminal, one of 2 things must be true. Either Doaks is a fool or all the shouting is just "show biz" & the criminal secretly works for Doaks. The Rockefellers are not fools.
While David runs the financial end of the Rockefeller dynasty, Nelson runs the political. Nelson would like to be President of the
You will recall that right in the middle of drawing up the Republican platform in 1960, Mr. Nixon suddenly left
In The Making of the President, 1960, Theodore White noted that Nixon accepted all the Rockefeller terms for this meeting, including provisions "that Nixon telephone Rockefeller personally with his request for a meeting; that they meet at the Rockefeller apartment … that their meeting be secret & later be announced in a press release from the Governor, not Nixon; that the meeting be clearly announced as taking place at the VP's request; that the statement of policy issuing from it be long, detailed, inclusive, not a summary communiqué."
The meeting produced the infamous "Compact of Fifth Avenue" in which the Republican Platform was scrapped & replaced by Rockefeller's socialist plans. The Wall Street Journal of 25Jul60, commented: "… a little band of conservatives within the party … are shoved to the sidelines… The 14 points are very liberal indeed; they comprise a platform akin in many ways (to the Democratic platform & they are a far cry from the things that conservative men think the Republican Party ought to stand for…" As Theodore White put it:
"Never had the quadrennial liberal swoop of the regulars been more nakedly dramatized than by the open compact of
The whole story behind what happened in Rockefeller's apartment will doubtless never be known. We can only make an educated guess in light of subsequent events. But it is obvious that since that time Mr. Nixon has been in the Rockefeller orbit.
After losing to Kennedy by an eyelash, Mr. Nixon, against his wishes, & at the request (or order) of Rockefeller, entered the
When Nixon left
The man most observers agree is the most powerful man in the Administration on domestic policy matters is Attorney General John Mitchell. Mitchell, who had been a Nixon law partner, served as campaign manager in 1968, & reportedly will serve in that capacity in 1972. The Wall Street Journal of 17Jan69, revealed that Mitchell was Rocky's personal lawyer. The Establishment's landscape painters have etched a picture of Mitchell as a tough cop-type conservative bent; it appears that in reality Mitchell is but another Rockefeller agent.
Richard Nixon was elected President on a platform which promised to stop
How did Mr. Nixon come to pick an ultra-liberal to be his #1 foreign policy advisor? We are told by TIME magazine that Mr. Nixon met Kissinger at a cocktail party given by Clare Boothe Luce during the Christmas holidays in 1967. Mr. Nixon is supposed to have been so impressed by Dr. Kissinger's cocktail party repartee that he appointed him to the most powerful position in the Nixon Administration. Mr. Nixon would have to be stupid to have done that; & Mr. Nixon is not stupid. The Kissinger appointment was arranged by Nelson Rockefeller. (
Mr. Nixon's fantastic about-face was praised by LBJ in the Washington Star of 1Dec71. The paper states:
"Former President LBJ acknowledges that Richard Nixon, as a Republican President, has been able to accomplish some things that a Democratic President could not have…
"'Can't you just see the uproar,' be asked during a recent interview, 'if I had been responsible for
"'Nixon has gotten by with it,' he observed, an appreciative tone in his voice. 'If I had tried to do it, or Truman, or Humphrey, or any Democrat, we would have been clobbered.'"
Nelson Rockefeller & Richard Nixon are theoretically political enemies, but Rocky arranged '68 election so that if he could not be President, someone whom he controlled would be. The Rockefeller family through their Chase Manhattan Bank & other entities have been great benefactors of the Soviet Union ever since Communist Revolution in
The boss & his 2 employees -- the 3 musketeers of the CFR -- Rocky, President Nixon & Henry Kissinger confer. Kissinger of Harvard was made virtual Assistant President by Rockefeller on whose staff he had served for a dozen years. Kissinger also had been on the staff of the CFR just prior to joining the Nixon Administration. Kissinger was the very embodiment of everything Nixon denounced during his '68 campaign. This explains why Nixon has reversed himself on so many stands. Among those to hail Mr. Nixon's move to the Left is Alger Hiss, the Communist spy Richard Nixon helped convict (Chicago Tribune, 25Oct71. It was the Hiss Case which catapulted Nixon from obscurity into the Senate, the Vice Presidency &, eventually, the White House.
7. PRESSURE FROM ABOVE & PRESSURE FROM BELOW
The Establishment's
official landscape artists have done a marvelous job of painting a picture of
Richard Nixon as a conservative. Unfortunately, this picture is 20 years out of
date. The very liberal Senator Hugh Scott of "… If President Liberal were actually in the White House, it is not at all hard to imagine the reaction to his program. The right would be assailing President Liberal for bugging out of
Instead, the liberals have showered the President with dead cats, while most conservatives have maintained a glum silence, & thus the Administration has been 'little credited' for 'much genuine achievement.' But there are certain special reasons, which Pat Moynihan omitted to mention, why this is so.
Alsop further explains how having the reputation of being an enemy of the Liberal Democrats helps Nixon pass their program:
"For one thing, there is a sort of unconscious conspiracy between the President & his natural enemies, the liberal Democrats, to conceal the extent to which his basic program, leaving aside frills & rhetoric, is really the liberal Democratic program. Richard Nixon is the first professional politician & 'real Republican' to be elected President in 40 years -- & it is not in the self-interest of the liberals to give credit to such a President for liberal initiatives. By the same token, it is not in the self-interest of the President to risk his conservative constituency by encouraging the notion that he is not a 'real Republican' after all, but a liberal Democrat at cut rates.
There are plenty of examples of the mutual obfuscation which results from this mutual interest. The withdrawal of half a million men from
… When the President cuts back real military strength more sharply than in a quarter of a century, the liberals attack him for failing to 'reorder priorities.' The President, in his rhetoric about a 'strong defense,' plays the same game. The result, as John Kenneth Galbraith accurately noted recently, is that 'most people & maybe most congressmen think the Administration is indulging the Pentagon even more than the Democrats,' which is the precise opposite of the truth…"
Alsop continued what is probably the most damning column ever written about Richard Nixon by noting the role that the mass media have played in portraying to the public an image that is the reverse of the truth:
"… There is also a human element in this exercise in mutual obfuscation. To the liberals, especially the liberal commentators who dominate the media, Richard Nixon is Dr. Fell ('The reason why I cannot tell, but this I know & know full well, I do not like thee, Dr. Fell.'). This is not surprising. Not too many years ago, Richard M. Nixon was one of the most effective -- & least lovable -- of the conservative Republican professionals of the McCarthy era."
The columnist, himself a member of the socialist Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), speculated on what the "old Nixon" would have had to say about the "new Nixon":
"… on his past record, it is not at all hard to imagine R.M. Nixon leading the assault on the President for his 'bug-out,' 'fiscal irresponsibility,' 'galloping socialism,' & all the rest of it. So how can one expect Mr. Nixon to defend President Liberal's program with the passionate conviction that a President Robert Kennedy, say, would have brought to the defense of such a program?"
Alsop has revealed the real Nixon & is obviously pleased. Those who voted for Nixon shouldn't be quite so happy. If you liked the Richard Nixon who ran for the Presidency, then you cannot, if you are consistent, like the Richard Nixon who is President. Nixon & his fellow "moderates" have turned the Republican elephant into a donkey in elephant's clothing. On 19Jun59, VP Nixon gloated: "In summary, the Republican administration produced the things that the Democrats promised." It looks as if it's happening again!
A year & a half earlier Nixon had been warbling a different tune:
"If we have nothing to offer other than a pale carbon-copy of the New Deal, if our only purpose is to gain & retain power, the Republican Party no longer has any reason to exist, & it ought to go out of business."
The Nixon "Game Plan," as Harvard Professor John Kenneth Galbraith gleefully points out, is SOCIALISM. The Nixon "Game Plan" is infinitely more clever & dangerous than those of his predecessors because it masquerades as being the opposite of what it is.
Mr. Nixon is aware that most Americans fear "big government." An Aug68, Gallup Poll showed that 46% of the American public believed that "big government" was the "biggest threat to the country."
While centralizing power at a rate which would have made Hubert Humphrey blush, Mr. Nixon has continued to pay lip service to decentralization. During the first year of his Administration Mr. Nixon announced his "New Federalism" (the name taken from the title of a book by Nelson Rockefeller). The first part of the "New Federalism" is the Family Assistance Program (FAP) which would, contrary to his campaign promises, provide a Guaranteed Annual Income. Based on suggestions from John Gardner of file CFR & Daniel Moynihan, a member of the board of directors of the socialist
The second major segment of the President's "New Federalism" is revenue sharing with the states, touted as a step in the decentralization of power from the federal government. Actually, the program does just the opposite. The money must first go from the states to
Mr. Nixon's "power to the people" slogan really means "power to the President."
House Ways & Means Chairman Wilbur Mills has called the revenue-sharing plan a "trap" that "could become a massive weapon against the independence of state & local government." The plan, said Mills, "goes in the direction of centralized government."
But, Mr. Nixon is very clever. In his 1971 State of the Union Message, the talk in which he used the Communist slogan "Power to the People," the President said:
"We in
That sounds reasonable doesn't it? The Executive branch will give up some power & the Congress will give up some power & the people will gain by having these powers returned to them. Right? Wrong! That is nothing but verbal sleight-of-hand. Notice the precision of Mr. Nixon's language. He speaks of the "Executive branch in
To many political observers the most shocking development of the past year was the admission by President Richard Nixon to newsman Howard K. Smith that he is "now a Keynesian in economics." The jolted Smith commented later, "That's a little like a Christian Crusader saying: 'All things considered, I think Mohammed was right.'" Howard K. Smith was well aware that such a statement was tantamount to a declaration by Mr. Nixon that "I am now a Socialist." John Maynard Keynes, the English economist & Fabian Socialist, bragged that he was promoting the "euthanasia of capitalism."
It is generally believed in
In his internationally syndicated column of 3Feb71, James Reston (C.F.R.) exclaimed:
"The Nixon budget is so complex, so unlike the Nixon of the past, so un-Republican that it defies rational analysis… The Nixon budget is more planned, has more welfare in it, & has a bigger predicted deficit than any other budget of this century."
During 1967, while on the primary trail, Richard Nixon made exorbitant Democrat spending his Number Two campaign issue, just behind the failure of the Democrats to win the Vietnam War. Mr. Johnson's 1967 Budget was $158.6 billion, "Which at the time seemed astronomical. Mr. Nixon claimed that if that amount were not sliced by $10 billion the country faced financial disaster. At a time when the Vietnam War was a far bigger financial drain than it is now, Richard Nixon argued that we should be spending around $150 billion. President Nixon is now spending $230 billion, & bills already introduced in Congress & likely to pass could push the 1972 Fiscal Budget (1Jul71-1Jul72) to $250 billion.
The point is that the man who campaigned as Mr. Frugal in 1968 is, in his third year of office, out-spending by $80-100 billion what he said his predecessor should spend. And some experts are predicting that Mr. Nixon could spend as much as $275 billion next year.
This is the same Richard Nixon who in
While it took LBJ 5 years to run up a $55 billion deficit, Senator Harry Byrd notes that the accumulated deficit for Mr. Nixon's first 3 years will reach at least $88 billion. Congressional experts are now predicting Richard Nixon could well pour on the red ink to a total of $124 billion in this term of office alone.
In order to halt inflation Mr. Nixon has now instituted wage & price controls. Most Americans, sick of seeing their paychecks shrink in purchasing power each month, have overwhelmingly approved. But this is because most people are not aware of the real causes of inflation. And you can be sure that the Establishment's landscape painters will not explain the truth to them. The truth is that there is a difference between inflation & the wage-price spiral. When the government runs a deficit, brand new money in the amount of the deficit is put into circulation. As the new money percolates through the economy it bids up wages & prices. This is easy to understand if you think of our economy as a giant auction. Just as at any other auction, if the bidders are suddenly supplied with more money, they will use that money to bid up prices. Inflation, in reality, is an increase in the supply of money. It causes the wage-price spiral which is generally mislabeled inflation. You could not have a wage price spiral if you did not have an increase in the money supply with which to pay it. This is not just economics, it is physics. You can't fill a quart bottle with a pint of milk. To say that the wage-price spiral causes inflation is like saying wet streets cause rain. Mr. Nixon, unlike the vast majority of the American public, is aware of the real causes of "inflation." He explained it clearly on 27Jan70:
"The inflation we have at the start of the Seventies was caused by heavy deficit spending in the Sixties. In the past decade, the Federal Government spent more than it took in -- $57 billion more. These deficits caused prices to rise 25% in a decade."
Business blames "inflation" on the unions, & unions blame "inflation" on business, but only the government can cause "inflation."
Mr. Nixon has fastened wage & price controls on the economy supposedly to solve a problem which Mr. Nixon (& LBJ) created by running huge deficits. If he sincerely wanted to stop "inflation" he would have put wage & price controls on the government rather than on the rest of us & would have stopped deficit spending. People are cheering Nixon because he "did something." This is akin to cheering for a motorist who shoots a pedestrian he has just run over.
Wage & price controls are at the very heart of Socialism. You can't have a totalitarian government without wage & price controls & you can't have a free country with them. Why? You cannot impose slavery upon people who have economic freedom. As long as people have economic freedom, they will be free. Wage & price controls are people controls. In his Phase II speech, Mr. Nixon made it clear that the 90-day wage & price controls are with us in one disguise or another from now on. They are a major step towards establishing an all-powerful Executive branch of the federal government.
After the Insiders have established the United Socialist States of
The Insiders' code word for the world superstate is "new world order," a phrase often used by Richard Nixon. The CFR states in its Study #7: "The
A world government has always been the object of the Communists. In 1915, in #40 of the Russian organ, The Socialist Democrat, Lenin proposed a "
One of the most important groups promoting the "world union" is the United World Federalists, whose membership is heavily interlocked with that of the CFR. The UWF advocate turning the UN into a full-fledged world government which would include the Communist nations.
Richard Nixon is, of course, far too clever to actually join the UWF, but he has supported their legislative program since his early days in Congress. In the Oct48 issue of the UWF publication World Government News, on p.14, there appears the following announcement:
"Richard Nixon: Introduced world government resolution (HCR 68) 1947, & ABC (World Government) resolution 1948."
World government has a strong emotional appeal for Americans, based on their universal desire for world peace. The Insiders have the Communists rattling their sabers with one hand & dangling the olive branch with the other. Naturally everyone gravitates towards the olive branch, not realizing that the olive branch is controlled by another arm of the entity that is rattling the sabers.
In Sept68, candidates for public office received a letter from the United World Federalists that stated:
"Our organization has been endorsed & commended by all
Richard Nixon: “Your organization can perform an important service by continuing to emphasize that world peace can only come thru world law. Our goal is world peace. Our instrument for achieving peace will be law & justice. If we concentrate our energies toward these ends, I am hopeful that real progress can be made.”
Hubert Humphrey: “Every one of us is committed to brotherhood among all nations, but no one pursues these goals with more dignity & dedication than the United World Federalists.”
There really was not a dime's worth of difference. Voters were given the choice between CFR world government advocate Nixon & CFR world government advocate Humphrey. Only the rhetoric was changed to fool the public.
A world government requires a world supreme court, & Mr. Nixon is on record in favor of a world supreme court. And a world government must have a world police force to enforce the laws of the World Super state & keep the slaves from rebelling. The LA Examiner of 28Oct50, reported that Congressman Richard Nixon had introduced a "resolution calling for the establishment of a UN police force…"
Not surprisingly, the Insiders have their pet planners preparing to administrate their world dictatorship. Under an immense geodetic dome at Southern Illinois University is a completely detailed map of the world which occupies the space of 3 football fields. Operating under grants from the Ford, Carnegie & Rockefeller foundations (all extensively interlocked with the CFR) a battery of scientists including everything from geographers, psychologists & behavioral scientists to natural scientists, biologists, biochemists & agronomists are making plans to control people. These elite planners conduct exercises in what they call "the world game." For example: There are too many people in Country A & not enough people in Country B. How do you move people from Country A to Country B? We need so many males, so many females, so many of this occupation & so many of that occupation, so many of this age & so many of that age. How do you get these people from Country A & settle them in Country B in the shortest possible time? Another example:
We have an uprising in Country C (or as it would now be called, District C) How long does it take to send in "peace" forces to stop the insurgency?
The World Game people run exercises on global control. If you plan on running the world, you cannot go about it haphazardly. That is why the Insiders of the Ford, Carnegie & Rockefeller foundations are making these plans. The real name of the game is 1984. We will have systematic population reduction, forced sterilization or anything else which the planners deem necessary to establish absolute control in their humanitarian utopia. But to enforce these plans, you must have an all-powerful world government. You can't do this if individual nations have sovereignty. And before you can facilitate the Great Merger, you must first centralize control within each nation, destroy the local police & remove the guns from the hands of the citizenry. You must replace our once free
What we are witnessing is the Communist tactic of pressure from above & pressure from below, described by Communist historian Jan Kozak as the device used by the Reds to capture control of
The American middle class is being squeezed to death by a vise. (See Chart 9) In the streets we have avowed revolutionary groups such as the Students for a Democratic Society (which was started by the League for Industrial Democracy, a group with strong CFR ties), the Black Panthers, the Yippies, the Young Socialist Alliance. These groups chant that if we don't "change"
Chart 9
Instead, we find that most
of these radicals are the recipients of largesse from major foundations or are
receiving money from the government through the War on Poverty. The
Rothschild-Rockefeller-CFR Insiders at the top "surrender to the
demands" for Socialism from the mobs below. The radicals are doing the
work of those whom they hate the most.Remember Bakunin's charge that Marx' followers had one foot in the bank & the other in the Socialist movement.
Further indications of Establishment financing of the Communist S.D.S. are contained in James Kunen's The Strawberry Statement: Notes On A College Revolutionary .Describing events at the 1968 S.D.S. national convention,
Kunen says:
"Also at the convention, men from Business International Roundtables -- the meetings sponsored by Business International for their client groups & heads of government -- tried to buy up a few radicals. These men are the world's leading industrialists & they convene to decide how our lives are going to go. These are the boys who wrote the
They agreed with us on Black control & student control.
They want McCarthy in. They see fascism as the threat, see it coming from Wallace. The only way McCarthy could win is if the crazies & young radicals act up & make Gene look more reasonable. They offered to finance our demonstrations in
THAT IS THE STRATEGY. THE LANDSCAPE-PAINTERS FOCUS YOUR ATTENTION ON THE KIDS IN THE STREET WHILE THE REAL DANGER IS FROM ABOVE.
As Frank Capell recently observed in The Review Of The News:
"Of course, we know that these radical students are not going to take over the government. What they are going to do is provide the excuse for the government to take over the people, by passing more & more repressive laws to 'keep things under control.'"
The radicals make a commotion in the streets while the Limousine Liberals at the top in NY & Washington are Socializing us. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A DICTATORSHIP OF THE ELITE DISGUISED AS A DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT.
Now the Insiders of the Establishment are moving into a more sophisticated method of applying pressure from below. John Gardner, a "Republican" & member of the CFR, has established a grass roots proletarian organization called Common Cause. This may become the biggest & most important organization in American history. Common Cause's goal is to organize welfare recipients, those who have not voted before, & Liberals to lobby for Socialism. That lobbying will not only be expressed in pressuring Congress to pass Socialist legislation but will also be expressed as ballot power in elections. Common Cause is supposedly the epitome of anti-Establishmentarianism, but who is paying the bills? The elite Insider radicals from above. The #1 bankroller of this group to overthrow the super-rich & re-distribute their wealth among the poor is John D. Rockefeller III. Other key financiers are Andrew Heiskell (CFR), chairman of the board of Time, Inc., Thomas Watson (CFR), chairman of the board of IBM, John Whitney (CFR) of the Standard Oil fortune, Sol Linowitz (CFR), Chairman of the board of Xerox, & Gardner Cowles (CFR) of Cowles publications. In any organization, the man who pays the bills is the boss. The others are his employees.
What better proof could we have that Socialism is not a movement of downtrodden masses but of power hungry elitists? The poor are merely pawns in the game. Needless to say, the landscape painters hide Common Cause's financial angels so that only those who understand that the Establishment's game plan is SOCIALISM understand what is going on before their very eyes.
8. YOU ARE THE ANSWER
Many people cannot refrain
from rationalizing. After reading this book, some will bemoan the fact that the
situation is hopeless. These will be many of the same people who, before
reading this book, really did not believe the problems facing us were serious.
Some people wake up & give up in the same week. This is, of course, just
exactly what the Insiders want you to do.The conspiracy can be defeated. The Insiders are not omnipotent. It is true that they control important parts of the federal government, high finance & the mass media. But they do not control everything, or the vise would already have been closed. We might say the conspiracy controls everything but you. You are their Achilles heel if you are willing to fight. There is an old cliché in sports that quitters never win & winners never quit. We need a million Americans who are not quitters, but, moreover, who have the will to win!
Of course, you can't buck the conspiracy head on, trying to fight it on its home grounds. But the Insiders are vulnerable to an end run. You, & thousands of others like you can make an end run if you want to. It is our intention in this closing chapter to show why it can be done & how you can do it.
The timing for an end run has never been better. What Barry Goldwater said in 1964, people were willing to believe in 1968. Most people who voted for Nixon did so because he promised to balance the budget, not establish wage & price controls; slash government spending, not multiply it; cut welfare, not push for a guaranteed annual income; stand firm against the Communists, not lead the Red Chinese into the UN; build America's defenses, not continue to unilaterally disarm us; & stop aid & trade with our avowed Communist enemies, not double it. These were the issues which supposedly differentiated Nixon from Humphrey. Now we see that Nixon has repudiated his own promises & carried out those of his opponent. By 1972, millions of Americans will have concluded that there is little difference between the leadership of the 2 major parties. And more & more people are beginning to realize that there is a tiny clique of conspirators at the top which controls both the Democrat & Republican Parties.
The one thing these conspirators cannot survive is exposure. The Insiders are successful only because so few of their victims know what is being planned & how Insiders are carrying out those plans. Conspiracies can operate only in the dark. They cannot stand the truthful light of day. Once any sizeable minority of the American people becomes aware of the conspiracy & what it is up to, the many decades of patient planning & work by the Insiders in this country can be destroyed in an amazingly short period of time.
This job is largely a matter of getting others to realize that they have been conned & are continuing to be conned. You must become the local arm of the world's largest floating university. But before you can go to work, pointing out these conspiratorial facts to others, you must know the facts yourself. This book is designed to give you these facts, & can be your greatest tool. It is available on tape cassettes* so that you can virtually memorize its contents by listening to it repeatedly while you are washing the dishes or driving to & from work. The concept of an army of individuals which is dedicated to exposing "the conspiracy" frightens the Insiders because it works outside the channels which they control.
(*From Gary Allen Communications,
Richard Nixon has said of the Republican Party: "We've got to have a tent everyone can get into." The Democrats have obviously believed that for a long time.
But a Party must be based on principles or it has no justification for existence. Bringing Socialists into the Republican Party theoretically may broaden the base, but, in reality, serves only to disfranchise those who believe in a
In 1972, the Republicans will try to make you forget that Richard Nixon was elected on George Wallace's platform but has been carrying out Hubert Humphrey's. The pitch will be "party unity." "If not Nixon then who?" will be the typical response to complaints about Nixon's actions. But unity with evil is evil. During the campaign of 1972, Nixon will again talk conservatively while the CFR's Democrat candidate will sound frighteningly radical in order to stampede you into accepting Nixon as the lesser of 2 evils. The Establishment may even run its John Lindsay or Eugene McCarthy as a far Left third or fourth party candidate in order to split the Democratic Party & re-elect Richard Nixon with a comparatively small number of votes.
It is only logical that the Insiders will try to apply the coup de grace against
Democrats & Republicans must break the Insider control of their respective parties. The CFR-types & their flunkies & social climbing opportunist supporters must be invited to leave or else the Patriots must leave.
It is up to you to put the politicians on the spot & make the CFR-Insiders a campaign issue. This can be accomplished easily by creating the base of thinking that will oppose their positions. The Socialists must be forced to gather into one party. The conspiracy doesn't want the resultant clear distinction between party ideologies. The Insiders want the issues between the parties to be cloudy & gray, centering on personalities, not principles. Neither party can come out strongly against Socialism as long as it is pushing Socialist programs. But that is the way the Insiders want it.
The issue, very simply, is the enslavement of you & your children. Just because many of these Insiders are theoretically Americans, don't think they will spare this country the terror they have brought to 30 others through their hired Communist thugs. To the Insiders, the world is their country & their only loyalty is to themselves & their fellow conspirators. Being an American means no more to them than being an honorary citizen of
Those who are complacent & hope to escape the terror because they were not involved in politics or resisted the New Order coming to power must be made, by you, to understand that this all-encompassing need for terror includes them especially… that they cannot escape by doing nothing.
What can we expect from the conspiracy during the next few years? Here are 14 signposts on the road to totalitarianism compiled some years ago by historian Dr. Warren Carroll & a refugee from Yugoslavian Communism, Mike Djordjevich. The list is not in any particular order nor is the order of any particular significance as given here. But the imposition of any one of these new restrictions on liberty (none of which was in effect when the list was compiled) would be a clear warning that the totalitarian state is very near; & once a significant number of them -- perhaps 5 has been imposed, we can rationally conclude that the remainder would not be far behind & that the fight for freedom & the preservation of the Republic has been lost in this country.
FOURTEEN
SIGNPOSTS TO SLAVERY
1. Restrictions on taking
money out of the country & on the establishment or retention
of a foreign bank account by an American citizen.2. Abolition of private ownership of hand guns.
3. Detention of individuals without judicial process.
4. Requirements that private financial transactions be keyed to social security numbers or other government identification so that government records of these transactions can be kept & fed into a computer.
5. Use of compulsory education laws to forbid attendance at presently existing private schools.
6. Compulsory non-military service.
7. Compulsory psychological treatment for non-government workers or public school children.
8. An official declaration that anti-Communist organizations are subversive & subsequent legal action taken to suppress them.
9. Laws limiting the number of people allowed to meet in a private home.
10. Any significant change in passport regulations to make passports more difficult to obtain or use.
11. Wage & price controls, especially in a non-wartime situation
12. Any kind of compulsory registration with the government of where individuals work.
13. Any attempt to restrict freedom of movement within the
14. Any attempt to make a new major law by executive decree (that is, actually put into effect, not merely authorized as by existing executive orders.)
As you are no doubt aware, President Nixon already has invoked #1, 14 & 14.
Steps 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 & 13 already have been proposed & some are actively campaigned for by organized groups. As of 1Jan72, banks must report to the government any deposit or withdrawal over $5,000. The next step will be to restrict the taking of money out of the country. Big Brother is watching your bank account!
Increased government control over many kinds of private schools is proposed annually in many state legislatures. Compulsory non-military service-a universal draft of all young men & women, with only a minority going into the armed services has been discussed by the Nixon Administration as an alternative to the draft. Sensitivity training is already required for an increasing number of government workers, teachers & school children. As long ago as 1961, Victor Reuther proposed that anti-Communist groups & organizations be investigated & placed on the Attorney General's subversive list. The propaganda war in progress to force registration or confiscation of firearms is the number one priority of all the collectivists-an armed citizenry is the major roadblock to a totalitarian takeover of the
You are in this fight whether you want to be or not. Unless you are an Insider, you are a victim. Whether you are a multimillionaire or a pauper you have an enormous amount at stake.
The Insiders are counting on your being too preoccupied with your own problems or too lazy to fight back while the chains of slavery are being fastened on you. They are counting on their mass media to con you, frighten you, or ridicule you out of saving your freedom, and, most of all, they are counting on your thinking you can escape by not taking part in opposing their takeover.
They are also counting on those of you who recognize the conspiracy becoming so involved with watching all moves that you become totally mesmerized by their machinations, & thus become incapable of acting.
The choice is yours. You can say, "It can't happen here!" But nearly every one of the one billion people enslaved by the Communists since 1945 doubtless said the same thing. Or you can end run this whole conspiratorial apparatus.
The choice you must make was enunciated by Winston Churchill when he told the people of
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure & not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you & only a precarious chance of survival."
Because we have ignored warning after warning, we are now at that place in history. Unless you do your part now, you will face a further choice, also described by Mr. Churchill. He said:
"There may be even a worse fate. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves."
WHAT WILL YOU
DO?
If you are unwilling to get
involved because you feel it may be bad for business or may jeopardize your
social respectability, just look into the eyes of your children & tell them
that making a buck & climbing the social ladder are more important to you
than they are.This is the end of our case.
If you have decided not to do anything about it, then you can close this book, read no further, & turn out the light. That is just what you will be doing for the
If you decide that you will do something — that you at least are not yet controlled — read on — pick up the ball we are tossing you & with thousands of others, let's "end run," the conspiracy.
Here's how: The 4 keys in this program are:
1. You. What you do now is, of course, the key to this whole operation. If you delay, your motivation will wane, your concern will recede, but the danger will increase. Remember, the Insiders don't care how much you know about their conspiracy so long as you don't do anything about it. So keep reading & then act.
2. This book: None Dare Call It Conspiracy. In writing this book we have tried to give a concise overall picture of the nature of the conspiracy. We wrote it not only to explain the conspiracy, but to give you a complete program of action now, so that the many "You's" around the country would not necessarily have to be articulate sales men to make your "end run." You can simply pass this book out & let it do the job for you. The conspiracy may be able to stifle publicity on this book & keep it off the magazine rack at your local supermarket, but they can't stop you from distributing it to friends, neighbors, relatives & business associates & especially in your precinct. With a potential 30-million distribution of this book to those mentioned above (& in a manner yet to be described), you will create a base of opinion that will throw the Insiders out.
It is quite possible that in distributing this book, questions will come up concerning certain statements & conclusions with which you are not able to deal. There are a number of organizations that have well documented material on all subjects raised in this book. But after considerable personal research the author has concluded that the organization which is the leader in this field, has had the most experience, & is doing the best job of exposing the conspiracy is The John Birch Society,*
(*The Berkeley Gazette stated in an editorial of 26Aug71, commenting on The John Birch Society's 1958 10-point predictions for the U.S., "Whatever Else, Call Him [Robert Welch] 'Correct?" Write
Doesn't it appear strange that this organization which works toward decentralization of political power & the exposure of the Insiders should be so vilified by the mass media, while the CFR, which promotes centralization of power in the hands of a few within a world government, is practically never mentioned? So contact The John Birch Society for further back-up information (
3. Your Precinct. The precinct is the lowest denominator in our political structure. Any politician will agree that whoever reaches & influences the most people in the precinct wins the election. When you break down the job to be done to this least common denominator, it doesn't seem to be nearly as big a job as when you look at those millions of votes that need to be switched. Many elections are won or lost by less than 5 votes per precinct. Remember that every vote-switch you can accomplish (by planting the seed with your book) really amounts to two votes, as it takes one from the other side.
Start your "end run" in your own precinct now. Lists of registered voters are available from your
4. Your Congressman. You have now completed the 3 simple basic moves in your "end run. Barring a wholesale awakening by the American people, it is probably wishful thinking to believe that the C.F.R.'s hold on the Presidency can be broken in 1972. But it is possible to block the Insiders' men in the House of Representatives. Congress can still lift a powerful voice against the conspiracy if only it would. It can also throw a searchlight on to the CFR's stranglehold on the executive branch of the government. No burglar tries to rob a house when a spotlight is on him. With your effort Congress can be that spotlight.
It is at the Congressional level that the conspiracy can be delayed at least until there is sufficient strength to rout it. But your local Congressional candidate must be forced to take a public stand on the Council on Foreign Relations, its goals, & its power in the federal government. And once your candidate is elected you must make sure that he does not submit to the incredible pressure which will be put upon him in
How would you like to be a Congressman who had voted for any one of the 14 Signposts to Slavery, asking to be elected by constituents who had read None Dare Call It Conspiracy? It is therefore easier to keep a Congressman on the straight & narrow than a Senator or the President. The latter run less frequently than Congressmen & represent tremendously larger geographical areas. Although it is not easy, it is still possible for a good Congressman to finance his campaign from within his district & not be dependent on the Insiders for campaign contributions.
If there are no Congressional candidates worth supporting in your area at this time, support one or more in other areas. Never contribute money to the Republican or Democratic National Committee. That money, except in token amounts, will never reach anti-CFR-Establishment candidates, most of whom suffer from a severe shortage of funds, at least until they are well established. Only contribute your campaign dollars to those who are committed to fighting the conspiracy. A candidate running on good conservative principles is not enough. We've had many such candidates, & although most of them are very good men, they never come to grips with the real problems -- exposing those behind the World Socialist Movement.
So, organize your "end run," pass out your books & then keep your eagle eye on your Congressman & his voting record.
This "end run" concept we are suggesting is not just a game we are playing even though we use a football term.
To summarize: You do not necessarily have to be an articulate salesman to make this "end run." You do not necessarily have to know all the in's & out's of the total conspiracy -- the book is intended to do this for you.
All you have to do is find the wherewithal to purchase the books & one way or another see that you blanket your precinct with them. Then force your Congressman to stand up to the CFR Establishment.
It is simple. It is straightforward. It is a workable plan.
With 30 million "end runs" being made during 1972, you can, & will, rout the conspiracy, turn the tide of history & prevent the enslavement of yourself & your family.
Remember, seeds planted in 1972 will pay off not only this year, but in 1974 & 1976. If we do not build a large counter-revolutionary base in 1972, the ball game will be lost by 1976.
MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
NOMINATED & APPOINTED BY PRESIDENT NIXON TO GOVERNMENT POSTS
ADM. GEORGE
W. ANDERSON JR., Chairman, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
DR. GEORGE
P. BAKER, Advisory Council on Executive Organization
GEORGE
BALL, Foreign Policy
Consultant to the State Department
JACOB D.
BEAM, Ambassador to the Soviet Union
DAVID E.
BELL. Member of the National Commission on Population Growth & the American
Future
LT. GEN.
DONALD V. BENNETT, Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency
C. FRED
BERGSTEN, Operations Staff of the National Security Council
ROBERT O.
BLAKE, Ambassador to Mali
FRED J.
BORCIL Member, Commission on International Trade & Investment Policy
DR. HAROLD
BROWN, General Advisory Committee of the U.S. Arms Control & Disarmament
Agency, & senior member of the U.S.
delegation for talks with the Soviet Union on
Strategic Arm Limitations (S.A.L.T.)
WILLIAM B.
BUFFUM, Deputy Representative to the UN; Ambassador to Lebanon
ELLSWORTH
BUNKER, Ambassador to South Vietnam
FREDERICK
BURKHARDT, Chairman, National Commission on Libraries & Information Service
DR. ARTHUR
BURNS, Counselor to the President-later Chairman of the Board of the Federal
Reserve, succeeding C.F.R. member William McCheaney Martin
HENRY A.
BYROADE, Ambassador to the Philippines
COURTENEY
BROWN, Member, Commission on International Trade & Investment Policy
DAVID K.B.
BRUCE, Chief of the U.S. Delegation to the Paris Talks
HARLAN CLEVELAND,
Ambassador to N.A.T.O.
RICHARD N.
COOPER, Operations, Staff of the National Security Council
PHILIP K.
CROWE, Ambassador to Norway
WILLIAM B.
DALE, Executive Director of International Monetary Fund
NATHANIEL
DAVIS, Ambassador to Chile
C. DOUGLAS
DILLON, General Advisory Committee of the U.S.
Arms Control & Disarmament Agency
HARVEY S.
FIRESTONE JR, Chairman of the Board of Governors, U.S. Organization, Inc.
WILLIAM C.
FOSTER, General Advisory Committee of the U.S.
Arms Control & Disarmament Agency
THOMAS S.
GATES, Chairman, Commission on an All-Volunteer Armed Force
CARL J.
GILBERT, Special Representative for Trade Negotiations
GEN. ANDREW
I. GOODPASTER, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe
(succeeding CFR member Gen. Lyman Lemnitzer)
KERMIT
GORDON, General Advisory Committee of the U.S.
Arms Control & Disarmament Agency
JOSEPH A.
GREENWALD, U.S. Rep. to the Organization for Economic Cooperation &
Development
GEN. ALFRED
M. GRUENTHER, Commission on an All-Volunteer Armed Force
JOHN W.
GARDNER, Board of Directors. National
Center
RICHARD
GARDNER, Member, Commission on International Trade & Investment Policy
T. KEITH
GLENNAN, U.S. Rep., International Atomic Energy Agency
GORDON
GRAY, Member, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board; Member, Civilian
Defense Advisory Council
MORTON
HALPERIN, Operations Staff of the National Security Council
CHRISTIAN
A. HERTER JR., Commissioner on the part of the U. S.
on the International Joint Commission U.S.
& Canada
REV.
THEODORE M. HESBURGH, Chairman of the U. S.
Commission on Civil Rights; Member of Commission on All-Volunteer Armed Force
SAMUEL P.
HUNTINGTON, Task Force on International Development
JOHN N.
IRWIN II, Special Emissary to Discuss Current U.S.
Relations with Peru
I.K.
JAMIESON, Member National Industrial Pollution Control Council
SEN.
JACOB K. JAVITS, Rep.
to 25th Session of General Assembly of U.N.
JOSEPH E.
JOHNSON, Alternate Rep. to the 24th Session of the General Assembly
of the U.N.
HOWARD W.
JOHNSON, Member, National Commission on Productivity
JAMES R.
KILLIAN, General Advisory Committee of the U. S.
Arms Control & Disarmament Agency
WILLIAM R.
KINTNER, Member of Board of Foreign Scholarships
HENRY
A. KISSINGER, Assistant
to the President for National Security Affairs. Chief Foreign Policy Advisor
ANTONIE T.
KNOPPERS. Member of Commission on International Trade & Investment Policy
GEN. GEORGE
A. LINCOLN, Director of the Office of Emergency Preparedness
HENRY
CABOT LODGE, Chief
Negotiator at the Paris Peace Talks
GEORGE
CABOT LODGE, Board of Directors, Inter-American Social Development Institute
HENRY
LOOMIS, Deputy Director of the US Information
Agency
DOUGLAS
MacARTHUR II, Ambassador to Iran
ROBERT
McCLINTOC, Ambassador to Venezuela
JOHN J.
McCLOY, Chairman, General Advisory Committee of the U.S.
Arms Control & Disarmament Agency
PAUL W.
McCRACKEN, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
EDWARD S.
MASON, Task Force on International Development
CHARLES A.
MEYER, Assistant Secretary of State
FRANKLIN D.
MURPHY, Member of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
ROBERT D.
MURPHY, Special Consultant on International Affairs
PAUL H.
NITZE, Senior member, U.S. Delegation for Talks with the Soviet
Union on Strategic Arms Limitations (S.A.L.T.)
GEN. LAURIS
NORSTAD, Commission on an All-Volunteer Armed Force; Member, General Advisory
Committee of the U.S. Arms Control &
Disarmament Agency
ALFRED C.
NEAL, Member, Commission on International Trade & Investment Policy
RODERIC L.
O'CONNOR, Assistant Administrator for East Asia
of the Agency for International Development
ROBERT E.
OSGOOD, Operations Staff of the National Security Council
FRANK PACE
JR., Member of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
RICHARD F.
PEDERSEN, Counselor of the State Department
JOHN R.
PETTY, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs
CHRISTOPHER
H. PHILLIPS, Deputy Rep. in the U.N. Security Council
ALAN PIFER,
Consultant to the President on Educational Finance
SEN.
CLAIBORNE PELL, Rep. to 25th
Session of the General Assembly of the U.N.
ISIDOR I. RABI, Consultant-at-Large to the President's Science
Advisory Committee
ELLIOT L.
RICHARDSON, Undersecretary of State - now head of the Dept. of Health,
Education & Welfare
JOHN
RICHARDSON JR., Assistant Secretary of State for Educational & Cultural
Affairs
JAMES ROCHE,
Board of Directors, National
Center
DAVID
ROCKEFELLER, Task Force
on International Development
NELSON
A. ROCKEFELLER, Head of
a Presidential Mission to Ascertain the Views of Leaders in the Latin American
countries
RODMAN
ROCKEFELLER, Member,
Advisory Council for Minority Enterprise
ROBERT V.
ROOSA, Task Force on International Development
KENNETH
RUSH, Ambassador to the Federal Republic of Germany
DEAN
RUSK, General Advisory
Committee of the U. S. Arms Control &
Disarmament Agency
JOHN
D. ROCKEFELLER III, Chairman, National Commission on Population Growth &
the American Future
NATHANIEL
SAMUELS, Deputy Undersecretary of State
ADOLPH W.
SCHMIDT, Ambassador to Canada
JOSEPH J.
SISCO, Assistant Secretary of State for the Middle East & South
Asia
DR. GLENN
T. SEABORG, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission
GERARD
SMITH, Director of the Arms Control & Disarmament Agency
HENRY D.
SMYTH, Alternate Rep. of the 13th Session of the General Conference
of the International Atomic Energy Agency
HELMUT
SONNENFELDT, Operations Staff of the National Security Council
JOHN R.
STEVENSON, Legal Advisor of the State Department
FRANK
STANTON, U.S. Advisory Commission on
Information
ROBERT
STRAUS-HUPE, Ambassador to Ceylon & the Maldives Republic
LEROY
STINEBOWER, Member, Commission on International Trade & Investment Policy
MAXWELL D.
TAYLOR, Chairman, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
LLEWELLYN
THOMPSON, Senior Member U.S. Delegation for talks with the Soviet
Union on Strategic Arms Limitations (S.A.L.T.)
PHILIP H.
TREZISE, Assistant Secretary of State
CYRUS
VANCE, General Advisory
Committee of the U.S. Arms Control &
Disarmament Agency
RAWLEIGH
WARNER JR., Board of Trustees
Woodrow Wilson
International Center
ARTHUR K.
WATSON, Ambassador to France
THOMAS
WATSON, Board of Directors, National
Center
JOHN H.
WHITNEY, Board of Directors, Corporation for Public Broadcasting
FRANCIS O.
WILCOX, Member of President's Commission for the Observance of the 25th
Anniversary of the U.N.
FRANKLIN H.
WILLIAMS, President's Personal Representative for the Negotiation of Future
Political Status with the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
WALTER
WRISTON, Member, National Commission on Productivity
CHARLES W.
YOST, Ambassador to the UN
OPERATION
COUNTERATTACK
You can help! For every
dollar you contribute, Concord Press
promises to mail out 4 books. Each one will go to a vital segment of Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these My Brethren, ye have done it unto
This document is provided for reference purposes only. Statements in this document do not reflect the opinions of Reactor Core staff or the owner. If you find ought to disagree with, that is as it ought be. Train your mind to test every thought, ideology, train of reasoning, & claim to truth. There is no justice when even a single voice goes unheard. (1Thes.5:21, 1Jn.4:1-3, Jn.14:26, Jn.6:26, Rev.12:10, Pr.14:15, Pro.18:13)
Ad Dei Glorium
0 Comments:
Post a Comment