Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Monday, November 7, 2022

Are You Worried And Can't Get Beyond It?

 

The Prophecy Concerning the 1st & 2nd Comings of Christ


 
DANIEL 9: EXACT PROPHECY

1981-01-02
D. Brandt Berg

Daniel gave one of the most amazing time prophecies in the whole Bible in Daniel 9, in which the very year of Christ’s crucifixion and when He became Messiah were prophesied. He didn’t actually become Messiah until He was crucified; technically He was not Savior of the world until He died. He died in 30 AD, according to our calendar. It’s important to remember the dates and years, because as you’ll see, it works out exactly as the Lord prophesied through Daniel, to the very year of His death.

But first of all, the Lord said that there were going to be 70 sevens of years (Daniel 9:24). The Bible translates it “weeks” because they use the same word for “seven” as for “week.” But in this case it should have been translated “sevens”—70 sevens, not 70 weeks. The Bible says: “Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.”

Seventy sevens of years, 490 years, “are determined upon thy people and thy holy city.” In other words, He’s talking about the Jews, and their holy city, Jerusalem. He said they’re going to have 70 sevens or 490 years of history to finish the transgression, make an end of sins, and make reconciliation for iniquity. Jesus did that when He died on the cross.

“And to bring in everlasting righteousness.” Now you can say that started with Jesus’ death on the cross, but it goes quite a bit beyond that. We don’t really enjoy worldwide righteousness today, do we? Only Christians, only those who love Jesus have inherited His righteousness, and there’s still plenty of iniquity in the world. Everlasting righteousness is only going to come into the world in full, completely, as far as Christ’s kingdom is concerned, when Jesus comes back.

He says, “Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times” (v. 25). Threescore and two is 62.

From the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince, or Jesus, shall be first of all seven sevens, or 49. And threescore and two is 62 sevens. Why did he divide it up like that? Because the seven sevens or the 49 years are talking about “The street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.”

It took them 49 years to rebuild Jerusalem and the wall, seven sevens. Then after that, it will be 62 sevens, or 434. That’s a total of 483 years. First of all, there would be seven sevens, 49 years, which was the time it took to rebuild the city and the wall. Then there would be 62 more: “And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself” (v. 26). The Messiah is Jesus, and He was going to be cut off, “but not for Himself.” He died on the cross, but not for Himself. For us!

From the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince would be first of all seven sevens, that was to build the city and the wall, and then 62 more sevens. First we have to find out when the commandment was issued and by whom, that the Jews should go home and rebuild the city and the wall. Not the temple—that was given earlier—but the city and the wall. The commandment to rebuild the temple was under Ezra, but the commandment to go home and build the city and the wall was under Nehemiah. The king who sent Nehemiah home to rebuild the city was Artaxerxes. He was still powerful and ruling and reigning, and he sent Nehemiah to rebuild Jerusalem and the wall. It took him exactly 49 years to do it.

Then after that, it was to be 62 sevens, 434 years, or a total of 483 years until Jesus was to be crucified. A total of 483 years from the time this king issued a proclamation to rebuild the city of Jerusalem. The date when he made that proclamation was 453 BC. From 454 BC to AD 30 is 483 years, and that’s a prophecy giving the exact length of time from the issuing of the edict to go and rebuild the city to the time of Christ, when He was crucified.

Jesus said, “It’s not for you to know the times or the seasons, and of that hour knows no man but My Father” (Acts 1:7; Matthew 24:36). But if He didn’t want us to know something about the times and seasons, why did He give us so many signs of the times? We may not know the day or the hour when Jesus is coming, but if we know exactly when the Antichrist takes over, then we will know the week or month when Jesus is coming.

What happened to the 70th week of Daniel, or the 70th seven years? I know the Lord told Daniel to close up the book and seal up the prophecy until the end, but now we’re supposed to open the book, break the seals, and read it and understand it. It’s been almost 2,500 years that the book of Daniel has been virtually a sealed book, Revelation virtually a sealed book, until just within about the past 150 years. Since about the middle of the 19th century, men have begun to open the book, break the seals, and understand the prophecies—what Daniel was saying and what John was saying in Revelation, and what Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and Isaiah were saying.

We’re in the 26th verse, continuing after Jesus’ death, “the Messiah cut off, but not for Himself.” That was obviously the crucifixion of Jesus. “And the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary, and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.”

He says, “the people of the prince that shall come.” That’s not Prince Jesus, because Jesus has already been crucified—this is talking about another prince that shall come and “destroy the city and the sanctuary, and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.”

You can consider that the Roman general Titus in a way was a forerunner, a prototype, but the final fulfillment is going to come in the 27th verse. Who is this prince that shall come? The Antichrist. “He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week” (v. 27). One seven, which means seven years. We find out later that he makes this covenant between himself and not only the Jews but also other religions that have to do with Jerusalem. It would have to be a covenant with three religions, with the Christians, the Muslims, and the Jews.

It has to be a covenant to restore worship, the rebuilding of the Jewish temple, and the restoration of sacrificial worship on the altar in front of the temple. He is going to allow the Jews to rebuild the temple, to restore the sacrificial worship, and to seem to have religious freedom again for 3½ years.

The 70th week begins with the covenant with the Jews and Christians and Muslims, that Jerusalem shall be a holy city and they can restore their sanctuaries and their worship. He’s going to give everybody religious freedom, and he brags about all he’s going to do for them. He does this to get their cooperation to make him the world dictator. So when he confirms the covenant, that starts the Antichrist kingdom.

Now whether it will be public when he does this, we don’t know. There have been lots of secret treaties in history. In fact, we didn’t find out until after World War II when the winners began to divvy up the spoils and the countries what secret promises and treaties had been made with Russia. First by Roosevelt at Yalta with Stalin, then by Truman at Potsdam also with Stalin. They divided up the world between the Allies and Russia should they win the war.

It may be a secret treaty or agreement by the Antichrist, and if so, it’ll be the smartest piece of politicking and diplomacy ever engineered! Anybody that settles the fights between the Israelis and the Arabs and the Christians and the Muslims and makes them come to an agreement is a genius, a superman, and that’s who it’ll be, the Antichrist. It’s called a holy covenant because it has to do with religion.

He internationalizes the city of Jerusalem. He makes that his capital. He sets his palace in it, and it becomes his city, the head of his world government. In order to get in firm control and power, he promises to internationalize the city of Jerusalem so that they will have religious freedom there and religious rights of worship and be able to restore their various temples and sanctuaries and churches, and all be able to have free access to Jerusalem. Like Rome in the time of the Roman Empire, of which he’s a fulfillment in a way, in which every Roman citizen throughout the empire, regardless of his nationality or his country, could travel freely from country to country and come to Rome as his capital city.

But in the middle of the seven years, he causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease. At the end of 3½ years he breaks the covenant: “And in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.” There’s going to be nothing but trouble from then on; it’s going to be an “overspreading of abominations.” That’s virtually the same term used in the “abomination of desolation” (Matthew 24:15).

After the Antichrist breaks the covenant, there are going to be 3½ years of Great Tribulation: desolations and wars and overspreading of abominations. He puts an image of himself in the holy place, in the temple, and from what we read in Revelation, it will have the power to speak (Revelation 13:15).

This last half of the seven years is the Great Tribulation; the first half is world peace. He makes the covenant as a world peace treaty, and everything is going fine; he’s restoring the world and he’s bringing world peace, until he’s finally got everything firmly in his grip. At the end of 3½ years he breaks the covenant, and Jesus said that he would then place the Abomination of Desolation in the holy place (Matthew 24:15). We find out that that’s an image of himself in Revelation 13.

In Matthew 24, Jesus says he’ll place it in the holy place, and Jesus predicts that will begin the Great Tribulation, and that it will last until He comes (Matthew 24:15, 21, 29–31). During this time, people are going to be branded with the Mark of the Beast. They’re not going to be allowed to worship God or worship anybody but the Antichrist. The Antichrist won’t want anybody to worship anybody but himself; he wants to be God! He’s going to be the Antichrist. This word does not mean just against Christ, but in place of Christ. He wants himself to be the Messiah and be worshipped like Jesus and be the world king like Jesus is going to be.

There’s the whole outline of history from the time of Daniel through the time of Christ, down to the very end. Verse 27: “Even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.” The Antichrist is going to be desolate; he’s been the desolator, and the Wrath of God is going to be poured out. The angel stands with one foot on the land and one foot on the sea and says, “Time shall be no more” (Revelation 10:5–6). Hallelujah!

I can promise you we’re going to know when Jesus is coming just as much as they should have known exactly when Jesus was going to come and be crucified 483 years before it happened. We’re going to at least know the year. Here’s a definite year, date, time prophecy with a specific length of time. The whole seven years is the reign of the Antichrist, starting at the signing of the covenant, when they internationalize Jerusalem. But in the middle of the week, the covenant is broken, the Abomination of Desolation is set up, and the Great Tribulation begins.

You may not know exactly when this covenant is made, because that would be big news when they finally settle this fracas between the Israelis and the Arabs and the dispute over Jerusalem. But when this Abomination of Desolation is set up, you’re going to know not only the exact length of the Tribulation, but the date of the coming of Jesus Christ! You are going to know at least 3½ years ahead of time.

Jesus said, “Of that day and that hour knows no man, only My Father in heaven.” He didn’t say we wouldn’t know the week, month, or certainly the year! But I believe we’re going to know the week, almost the day and the hour, figuring exactly 3½ years from when Jesus said “when ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation stand in the holy place, flee to the mountains” (Matthew 24:15–16).

Here are two of the most exact time prophecies in the Bible, one about the First Coming of Christ and one about the Second Coming of Christ. The two most specific prophecies in the Bible are about Jesus’ First and Second Coming. Isn’t that wonderful? Maybe that’s why the old woman Anna and the old prophet Simeon were in the temple, because they knew it was getting to be near the time of the Messiah. He’d have to be born pretty soon if He was going to be crucified in 30 AD. The old woman prophesied when she saw Him and dear old Simeon took Him in his arms and said, “Let now Thy servant depart in peace, for mine eyes have seen Thy salvation” (Luke 2:28–30).

When you see Jesus coming down from the sky, you’re going to either be still alive and pop up from where you are or pop out of your grave—and you’re going to say, “Let thy servant depart in peace, for mine eyes are beholding the glory of God!” Hallelujah!

Copyright © January 1981 by the Family International

Sunday, November 6, 2022

Mysterious Deaths Could Be Vaccine Related

 

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca

Back to top

What Does Putin Want?

Welcome to Sott.net
Sun, 06 Nov 2022
Secret History
Vladimir Putin and Russian Sovereignism

José Alsina Calvés
The Postil Magazine
Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:22 UTC

© The Postil Magazine
The Motherland Calls (1967).As we mentioned in a previous article, Boris Yeltsin's period of government in Russia led the country into unprecedented economic chaos and a real danger of fragmentation. The savage privatization of companies and infrastructures gave birth to the emergence of the so-called "oligarchs," former officials and politicians of the communist regime who had accumulated a great deal of power and wealth with these privatizations, wealth that contrasted with the growing misery of the majority of the Russian population.

In September and October 1993, the discontent of a large part of the population against Yeltsin's policies led to the uprising of the Duma (parliament) against the president. The previous elections had given a majority to Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a populist and nationalist leader, but the very presidentialist structure of Russian politics meant that in reality the Duma had very little power. In the uprising would converge the patriotic and illiberal forces that would form the basis of the patriotic movement that would be led by Vladimir Putin: Zhirinovsky's nationalists, the Russian communist party (actually national-communist) of Gennady Zyuganov, and tsarist and orthodox religious groups. Despite their ideological differences, these groups had in common their opposition to liberalism and Westernism, and their defense of the integrity and sovereignty of Russia.

The rebel deputies made a strong stand in the Duma building, which was shelled by military units loyal to Yeltsin. The uprising was crushed. But from this point on Yeltsin's political line began to waver. Yeltsin's eight years in power had been a truly dark period in Russian history, with an anti-national government allied to the interests of foreign powers. His policy of change towards a Western-style liberal society was based on Western foreign investment and large loans from international financial institutions. However, none of this materialized in reality — the loans from the International Monetary Fund were in dribs and drabs, immensely smaller than promised and served only to pay the interest on the foreign debt.

In a way, a certain parallel can be drawn between the Russian and Spanish transitions: Governments that respond to foreign interests, dismantling of industry, privatization of companies and danger of fragmentation due to growing nationalism. The only difference is that in Spain there has not been the patriotic reaction that took place in Russia.

Although the uprising in the Duma was crushed by force, it showed the failure of the Yeltsin project. The oligarchs, enriched by savage privatizations, and who supported liberal and pro-Western policies, withdrew their support for the president and promoted an unknown — Vladimir Putin, thinking that he would carry out a policy more in line with their interests. Yeltsin resigned on December 31, 1999, so the year 2000 was the beginning of a new era in Russia.

Vladimir Putin was a bureaucrat. He had nothing to do with the patriotic and sovereigntist forces that had led the 1993 uprising. But Putin came from the Security Services (the former KGB) and was educated in the idea that these services, together with the military might, were meant to defend the national interest.

From the beginning of his mandate, Putin advocated a more assertive and nationalistic foreign policy, which would not be subordinated to the interests of the Western powers, and which gave him the support of the Russian military elite. But, at the same time, he skillfully enlisted the support of Boris Berezovsky, the leading oligarch of the Yeltsin era, who thought, wrongly, that Putin would further his interests.

Putin forced the oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky into exile. He also brought about the fall of Roman Abramovich and Alexander Voloshin, other powerful oligarchs. Subsequently, the new leaders of these clans helped him to drive out Berezovsky.

In fact, from the very beginning, Putin initiated a battle for control of the economy, which led to a confrontation with the oligarchs. He succeeded in exiling Berezovsky and Abramovich. Subsequently, in July 2000, he arrested Vladimir Gusinsky, the largest media owner, accusing him of having stolen ten million dollars from the state-owned Russian Video company.

In 2003, near the end of his first term, Putin arrested the powerful oil millionaire Mikhail Kodorkovsky, accusing him of tax evasion and corruption. Even at that time, and using these arrests as an excuse, the West began to accuse Putin of "authoritarianism" and of returning to the police methods of the Stalinist era. This campaign was joined by the media (New York Times, 2003, Washington Post, 2003); and the U.S. State Department itself claimed that the basic freedom of Russians was in danger. As we can see, the Western (more specifically US) animosity towards Putin goes back a long way, from the moment he refused to be a puppet — like his predecessor, Yeltsin.

Kodorkovsky perfectly represented the former functionary of the communist apparatus, enriched by the savage privatizations of the Yeltsin era. He tried to use his immense fortune to finance his campaign for the Russian presidency, emboldened by Western support, which presented him as a representative of "liberal and democratic" values.

The concentration of wealth in the hands of a few oligarchs had caused some 31 million Russians (more than 20% of the population) to subsist on the equivalent, or less, of 50 dollars a month. According to a UN study, half of the Russian population lived in poverty; and according to figures from the Russian State Statistics Committee, in 2002, more than forty million Russians suffered from malnutrition. In such circumstances, it no longer seems so strange that many Russians longed for the Soviet era.

Together with this data concerning the quality of life, the destruction of the state health care system should also be noted. All this led to a drop in life expectancy from 70 years for men in the Soviet era to 57 years.

The Putin government's political offensive against Kodorkovsky was central to President Putin's second election in 2003. It projected an image of fighting against the oligarchs that made him very popular for a population that, in the words of political scientist Yuri Tsyganov, wanted to see all Russian gangsters prosecuted and punished for the social destruction they had caused in Russia.

Kodorkovsky was noted, not only for the accumulation of great wealth, but for his intention to use it politically. He had made large contributions of money to what he called "democratic opposition parties," and had tried to exploit social discontent to instigate a change of regime.

In view of all this, the Western propaganda that keeps talking about "Putin's oligarchs" is pathetic, when precisely what has characterized Putin's domestic policy has been the persecution and economic and political neutralization of these oligarchs, enriched during the Yeltsin period, and who had been characterized by their support for liberal and Westernist ideas in Russia.

Towards the end of his second term, in 2007, Putin gave an important speech at the Munich Conference on security policy. In this speech he set out a whole doctrine of international relations based on multipolarity, a doctrine that is essential to know in order to understand the deep roots of the current conflict with Ukraine.

This doctrine can be summarized in the following points:The unipolar model of the world is not only unacceptable, it is impossible.
The USA has overstepped its national borders in every sense, imposing its economic, political, cultural and educational policies on other nations.
Decision-making on the use of military force should be at the UN.
NATO is advancing its border forces to our borders.
What happened to those promises given by our Western partners after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact?
With one hand "charitable aid" is given, with the other hand economic backwardness is preserved and profits are collected.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has become an instrument for securing the interests of some states against others.
Russia, in its millennia-long history, has always had an independent foreign policy. We will not change this tradition.With these eight points Putin clearly established the basic lines of his international policy. The mere fact of maintaining the unity of Russia against the policies of balkanization and disintegration of the Yeltsin era readily meant a confrontation with the unipolar "New World Order," cherished by the US after the collapse of the USSR. Maintaining Russian national pride, the refusal to ask for forgiveness, the uninhibited assumption of its own history (from Tsarism to the USSR) — constituted a provocation towards the ideology of this "New World Order," which consists of nothing more than exporting and imposing the values of American society on the entire globe.

To all this must be added the low permeability of Russian society as a whole to the ideological project of Agenda 2030, with all its tentacles: neo-feminism, climate hysteria, gender ideology, immigrationism and multiculturalism. Russia has become a problem for the "New World Order," a "problem" with a vast expanse, reserve of raw materials and nuclear weapons.

During the Trump period, nothing serious happened. Trump proved to be the least globalist of all US presidents (he did not initiate any war), more concerned with domestic issues of the American nation, and whose moves in international politics did not clash (at least head-on) with Russia.

With the arrival of Biden everything changed. This character, who is nothing more than a puppet of the neo-con sectors of the Democratic Party, made it very clear in his electoral campaign that his policy would be aimed at making the USA once again the world LEADER. This meant that the USA would return to the policy of Unipolarity (disguised as "multilateralism") and, therefore, confrontation with any power that opposed them.

Let us recall that the neo-cons are the spokesmen of a messianic vision of America as a nation united only by a creed capable of extending to all humanity. In the neo-con theory, the USA is a "universal nation" that has "human rights" as its foreign policy axis, in the same way as the Soviets had Marxism-Leninism. Biden's America is thus once again the expansive epicenter of "liberal democracy."

For the neo-cons, that is, for Biden, liberal democracy and the market economy, can be built anywhere in the world, with the help, if necessary, of American fighter-bombers and missiles; or, better still, of a puppet state — as in the case of Ukraine. Any opposition is "tribalism," Nazism, Stalinism or all three at once. Naturally, the arms lobby smiles complacently.

José Alsina Calvés is a historian and philosopher who specializes in political biography, the history of science and the history of ideas and edits the journal Nihil Obstat. This article appears through the kind courtesy of Posmodernia.



Copyright © Fight for Your Faith