Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Authority, Opinion, and the Definition of Marriage


Georgia Purdom


It’s been all over the news—and unless you live under a rock, you probably know what I’m referring to. Dan Cathy, president of Chick-fil-A, defined marriage according to the Bible and a media storm ensued. Cathy stated, “We are very much supportive of the family—the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that.”[1]

My husband said he didn’t know why people were so surprised. After all, Cathy is a Christian, and we should expect him to define marriage according to the Bible. He’s right, but in a society that says we should be tolerant of everything (except the right to be intolerant, of course), Cathy’s statement was considered completely unacceptable.

What I really appreciated about Cathy’s statement was the phrase, “biblical definition of the family unit.” As Christians, the Bible is our ultimate authority, so when we define marriage or share our thinking on any issue, it must be grounded in the authority of God’s Word. Otherwise, it’s just our opinion! Scotland recently decided to legalize gay marriage. In an article by a minister of the Church of Scotland who professes to be a Christian, he stated that initially he opposed gay marriage but changed his mind.[2] He stated, “So what made me change my mind? The key factors were meeting Christian same-sex partners, and revisiting scriptures which were used to buttress the Churches’ anti-gay position.”

Notice that one of the key factors is what I would call the “happiness factor.” He describes same-sex couples he knows and how happy, committed, and loving they are. Essentially he is saying that gay marriage is right because it makes people happy. But this is nothing more than his opinion! Is that how right and wrong should be decided? What if it makes someone happy to shoot and kill other people—should that also be considered right?

In the article he doesn’t deal with specific biblical passages that speak against homosexuality (e.g., Romans 1) that should be his focus. Instead, he says that since certain civil laws (e.g., stoning disobedient children) are no longer applicable and because, “In the past, people have used scripture to support slavery and to oppress women,” therefore the Bible isn’t always right or relevant. He writes, “The truth is that language is always changing to meet new situations.” But what does God say about His Word in Proverbs 30:5–6?




Every word of God is pure;
 He is a shield to those who put their trust in Him.
Do not add to His words,
 Lest He rebuke you, and you be found a liar.

The language that God uses to convey His truth never changes! Now, our ministry is centered on apologetics and not questions regarding Old Testament law, but my opinion is that certain civil laws do not apply today because they were specifically for the nation of Israel under the old covenant (or another view is that God has changed, modified, or abrogated certain laws in the New Testament). People have read their own ideas into the Bible to support racism and the oppression of women, but God’s Word makes it clear that we are one race (Acts 17:26) and that women and men are equal before Christ (Galatians 3:28).

Although it’s easy to see the problems with the ideas of this compromised Christian minister, I see many Christians today “leaving the Bible out of it” when they defend the biblical definition of marriage. In interviews I have watched when Christians are asked why marriage should be defined as one man and one woman, many will say things like, “Traditional marriage is what’s best for society,” or “Children need a mother and a father.” While these are good outcomes of traditional marriage, they are not the reason marriage should be defined as between one man and one woman. That definition comes solely from the Bible!

If it’s up to man to decide what marriage should be, then the definition is completely arbitrary and whose arbitrary opinion should become law? Who defines the “best for society” and why that should be the goal? Why not what’s worst for society? Without the ultimate authority of God’s Word, the meaning of words like good and bad, right and wrong, are meaningless. Why can’t you marry more than one person, your dog or your car? Proponents of gay marriage say it will never lead to things like that. But why not? That is the logical outcome, no matter how absurd it may seem now, when there is no ultimate authority that determines the definition of marriage. I encourage you to read “Morality- the Secular Response?” by Bodie Hodge for more on these ideas.

My family showed our support for Chick-fil-A on Saturday. Even on Saturday the line was out to the door the entire time we were there! How encouraging to see such a great outpouring of support for a business run on biblical principles.


I love Chick-fil-A!


Even though my husband Chris is not a fan of chicken, he enjoyed the meal, and Elizabeth loves going there!

Keep fighting the good fight of the faith![1] K. Allan Blume, “’Guilty as charged,’ Cathy says of Chick-fil-A’s stand on biblical and family values,” Baptist Press, July 16, 2012.

[2] Ron Ferguson, “Same-sex marriage debate rages on as the government goes down a courageous road,”Aberdeen Press and Journal, July 31, 2012.

Conte com Milagres!


David Brandt Berg

Quando é fraco, então é forte, porque a força de Deus se manifesta.[1] Se a pessoa não tem o Senhor, qualquer cansaço físico ou problema de saúde pode desanimá-la. A tendência da fraqueza física é enfraquecer o espírito. O Diabo o ataca quando você não está bem. Ele lança golpes sujos e luta da maneira mais desonesta. Mas, por outro lado, quando você está para baixo, o Senhor o resgata.

Não pode achar que todo ataque do Inimigo é culpa sua. Às vezes, atraímos ataques porque ficamos com a resistência baixa, vulneráveis. E ele gosta de atacar nessas ocasiões, quando estão mais fracos. Por isso, é sua culpa, em parte. Mas, por outro lado, nem sempre é diretamente por um grande pecado ou fraqueza, ou porque não ficou tão perto do Senhor como devia.

Lembre-se que Jesus inclusive foi levado ao deserto e tentado pelo próprio Diabo, e até mesmo o Seu corpo físico sofreu nas mãos do Diabo por um tempo. Imagine! O Diabo teve permissão para colocar Jesus à prova e atacá-lO. Mas, nesses ataques, Ele resistiu ao Inimigo com a Palavra de Deus e recusou-se a se submeter, até o Inimigo perceber que Jesus não ia desistir, e então ele desistiu.[2]

Foi um período de prova logo antes de Jesus iniciar o Seu ministério, depois de ter passado 40 dias em oração e jejum. Sabemos que Jesus era perfeito e tudo aquilo não foi decorrente do pecado. O Senhor permite essas provas para fortalecer a nossa fé.

No caso da minha mãe, sempre que ela ia dar testemunho da cura milagrosa de uma paralisia quase total, ela passava por uma grande prova e sofria um terrível ataque do Inimigo.

Na última noite das suas reuniões ela sempre contava seu testemunho de cura e salvação, e essa história de vida era uma das coisas mais poderosas que ela tinha, e por meio da qual ganhou muitas almas e inspirou muita fé nas pessoas.

No entanto, não me lembro de praticamente nenhuma ocasião quando o Inimigo não tenha tentado detê-la antes de contar o seu testemunho. Ela ou ficava extremamente doente ou quebrava os óculos, ou caia e se machucava, ou algo assim. O Diabo corria solto e atacava de todos os lados para detê-la.

A minha mãe costumava dizer, “O Diabo tem medo do testemunho”, e não é possível dar esse tipo de testemunho se não viver e praticar tudo isso.

Uma vez, depois de mais ou menos um ano que ficou salva e foi curada, sentada no palco esperando para dar o seu testemunho, ela sentiu o corpo ficar paralisado de novo. Não conseguia mexer as pernas. Por um momento ela ficou grudada na cadeira sem conseguir se mexer, e pensou, “Senhor, o que está acontecendo? O que é isto?” O Senhor imediatamente lhe deu a resposta por meio de um versículo um tanto estranho: “São vaidades vãs”.[3]

Ela então disse: “Ah, quer dizer que é uma mentira do Diabo? Ele está tentando me convencer de que estou paralítica, mas não é verdade!” Ela então repreendeu o Diabo e foi quando anunciaram o seu nome. Ela pulou da cadeira e foi à frente, para o púlpito, dando o seu testemunho com muito mais poder do que até então.

A minha mãe já havia aprendido que o Inimigo não desiste tão fácil. Afinal, ela ficara cinco anos de cama e fora curada milagrosa e instantaneamente. Quando descobriu que estava curada e pediu ajuda para sentar-se na cama, algo que não fazia há cinco anos, o médico disse à enfermeira, “Não deixe ela se levantar. Esse é o impulso da morte!”

Minha mãe disse, “Saia da frente. Não atrapalhe Deus!”, e pediu à empregada para ajudá-la a se sentar. Ela tinha passado muito tempo sedada durante cinco anos, praticamente na mesma posição, porque o seu coração ameaçava parar de bater.

E agora, de repente, ela dizia que ia se sentar. É claro que foi um verdadeiro passo de fé. Mesmo que ela não tivesse tido nenhum problema, sentar-se subitamente depois de cinco anos teria sido um grande impacto no seu coração.

Então, sentada ali na cama, de repente ela começou a sangrar e desmaiou. Voltou a si pouco tempo depois, em uma poça de sangue e perguntou: “Senhor, qual é o problema? Achei que estava curada! Por que estou com esta hemorragia terrível?”

Imediatamente lhe veio uma visão. Apesar de não saber muito sobre cura, ela conhecia a Palavra, o Senhor podia lhe responder com um versículo, e viram-lhe dois versículos.

Um para lhe mostrar a razão: “O inimigo anda em derredor bramando como um leão buscando a quem possa tragar!”[4] O Senhor estava lhe dizendo que o Inimigo é que a combatia.

O outro versículo foi para encorajá-la: “Quando o inimigo vier como uma corrente de águas, o Espírito do Senhor arvorará a sua bandeira contra ele!”[5] E ela então percebeu que devia repreender o Inimigo diretamente.

Um outro versículo também lhe veio, “Resisti ao inimigo e ele fugirá de vós.”[6] Ela então começou a lutar de verdade contra o Inimigo. Sabia muito pouco sobre tudo isso, de modo que foi, sem dúvida, o Espírito de Deus se manifestando.

A vitória não veio sem antes uma grande prova e ataque do Inimigo, mesmo depois de estar curada. Mas quando meu pai chegou à casa, ela finalmente se levantou com a ajuda dele e caminhou sozinha pela primeira vez em anos!

O Senhor nos coloca à prova para obter uma vitória ainda maior da aparente derrota, porque isso nos faz aproximar mais de Deus, clamar e realmente recorrer a Ele. Caso contrário, a tendência é deixar o barco correr. Mas dessa forma precisamos nos apoiar mais no Senhor. Quando você finalmente ganha a vitória sobre o Inimigo, então o Senhor pode Se manifestar completamente.

O que Inimigo não sabe e tenta fazê-lo se esquecer, para impedi-lo de clamar a ajuda ao Senhor, é que “Quando sou fraco, então sou forte, pois a Sua força se aperfeiçoa na minha fraqueza”.[7] Eu sei que muitas vezes, quando estava mais fraco na carne, estava mais forte no espírito, porque tinha que me entregar completamente nas mãos do Senhor. Você não sabe como vai chegar lá, mas Ele pode fazer a obra para você.

Uma vez tive um sonho interessante. Maria, eu e algumas pessoas estavam sentadas no saguão de um hotel antigo escrevendo cartas, lendo etc. Mas, ao que parece, puxamos conversa com o jovem recepcionista de cabelos loiros já quase na casa dos 30.

Estávamos testemunhando para ele sobre o Senhor e o amor, mas ele parecia um pouco desiludido e cético, amargurado e cansado de tudo, incerto quanto ao amor.

Então eu disse, “É claro que existe amor! Todos precisam de amor”. Olhei nos seus olhos e disse, “Você precisa de amor como todas as outras pessoas”. Ele ficou um pouco sem graça, e disse, “É, acho que preciso. Gostaria que fosse à minha casa conversar com minha esposa. Ela também precisa do amor de Deus”.

Foi como se ele tivesse finalmente encontrado o que buscava e queria compartilhar com a pessoa que amava. Fomos à sua casa, e ao pisarmos no jardim ele pediu desculpas pelo lixo espalhado no local. Havia uma pilha de madeira, e diferentes móveis e uma pilha de tralha aqui e ali.

Ele disse, “Sinto muito, mas sabem como é, a gente vai acumulando coisas…”. Eu disse, “É assim mesmo quando a gente está construindo uma casa. Parece que nunca vai ficar pronta. Consome bastante tempo”. Eu estava tentando deixá-lo à vontade, já que ele estava sem graça por ter desperdiçado tanto tempo em coisas materiais.

É interessante, quando falamos do amor do Senhor e dos verdadeiros valores da vida, as pessoas começam a perceber como as outras coisas nada valem.

Entramos na casa, uma construção antiga. Enquanto estávamos em pé na sala, ele falava que gostaria de ajudar sua esposa com o amor do Senhor que tínhamos mencionado.

De repente, abriu-se um pouco a porta de aceso a uma escada, onde se via uma jovem, aparentemente sua esposa, com uma camisola de seda, cabelos escuros e curtos. Parecia surpresa e sem jeito por terem chegado convidados e ela não estar devidamente arrumada para recebê-los.

A minha impressão é que ela queria passar despercebida, mas quando a vi passando pela porta, eu disse, para cortar o gelo e aliviar o constrangimento dela, “Toda casa tem um anjo, este deve ser o seu”.Todos sorrimos e rimos, e ao ver que tinha sido pega, ela virou-se na nossa direção e sorriu. Ficamos muito espantados!

O rosto dela estava coberto de acne. Pareciam bolhinhas pretas ou algo assim em todo o seu rosto. Se não fosse por isso ela seria uma bonita moça de vinte e poucos anos, mas estava uma bagunça! Ela ficou ainda mais sem graça ao perceber nossa surpresa com o terrível estado do seu rosto.

Pedindo desclpas, ela disse, “Sinto muito, mas tenho isso há muito tempo. Nada ajuda”.Mas eu disse, “Olha, o Senhor pode ajudar. Nada é impossível para o Senhor. Ele pode fazer coisas ainda maiores do que isso. Você só precisa acreditar nEle, confiar em Jesus e orar por isso”.

Ela parecia não ter esperança, como se achasse impossível fazer algo para resolver a situação. Mas o marido aparentemente tinha fé no poder do Senhor, que Ele responderia à oração, e fé em nós. Então ele disse, “Claro, por favor, orem por ela.”

Então fui até ela, segurei o seu rosto e orei pedindo que o Senhor a livrasse daquele mal e a curasse. Foi uma oração fervorosa, porque senti que seria um verdadeiro testemunho para o jovem e encorajaria a sua fé quanto a tudo que tínhamos testemunhado para ele.

Quando terminei de orar, tirei as mãos do seu rosto e estava totalmente limpo, curado, lindo.

Impressionados, começamos a louvar ao Senhor e Lhe agradecer por Sua fidelidade e por ter curado essa jovem como um testemunho do Seu poder, principalmente para o jovem marido. Mas, aparentemente, ela estava tão desencorajada que não acreditou, e disse desanimada, “É, provavelmente vai voltar, como sempre acontece”. Eu lhe disse para agradecer ao Senhor e ter fé, e não voltaria, porque o Senhor a tinha curado. Mas ela ainda assim tinha uma atitude tipo “Olha, não estou acreditando muito”.

O jovem não cabia em si de contente, totalmente emocionado, nos agradeceu e chamou a atenção de leve dela por sua falta de fé.

Uma das lições do sonho é que eu aprendi sobre ser fiel em testemunhar. O Senhor sempre vai ser fiel e nos ajudar até ao fim e fazer a Sua parte.

Mas, é claro, o que mais me impressionou no sonho foi o incrível milagre de cura, para o qual deveríamos ter cada vez mais fé, e teríamos se formos fieis e acreditarmos, confiarmos em Deus, orarmos pelas pessoas como devemos fazer, e contarmos com milagres como sinal e testemunho para encorajar a fé das pessoas.

A única razão porque não vemos mais milagres é porque não acreditamos em Deus como devíamos, não desafiamos o Inimigo, repreendemos o Diabo nem esperamos que Deus atenda! Se fizéssemos isso, veríamos muito mais milagres desse tipo! Lembro de ficar com vergonha por não confiarmos mais em Deus e esperarmos esse tipo de milagres. Deus nos abençoe com mais fé!

Conte com milagres! E, em nome de Jesus, os receberá! “Creia e recebereis”![8] Conte com milagres!

Publicado originalmente em julho de 1975. Atualizado e republicado em junho de 2012. Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli. Revisão Denise Oliveira.


[1] 2Coríntios 12:9–10.

[2] Mateus 4:1–11.

[3] Salmo 31:6; Jonas 2:8.

[4] 1Pedro 5:8.

[5] Isaias 59:19.

[6] Tiago 4:7.

[7] 2Coríntios 12:9–10.

[8] Marcos 11:24.

Die Daily


“For the love of Christ constrains us.”1
By David Brandt Berg

Download Audio (6.02MB)

What do you have a vision for? What do you have faith for? What do you yourself expect God to do this year, not next year? What can you see happening right now and from now on? What do you personally plan to do about it? What do you personally hope to do about it and want to do about it?

The most uncomfortable place for a Christian is a comfortable place. One of the greatest dangers is the feeling that you’ve really accomplished something; so much so, that you no longer have that driving motivation which makes you feel like you cannot stop, that you’ve got to keep going even if it kills you!

We cannot go on “business as usual”! If we don’t obey God, this could happen to us, the feeling that we have arrived—that we’ve made it and we’re satisfied with what we’ve accomplished. The minute you get that feeling, that’s as far as you get.

How like death moving is! It’s the end of one life and the beginning of another. Moving is hard to do. I’m having a real battle moving on to the next place. If I have to keep moving, I have to keep dying. You can understand why Paul said, “I die daily.”2

It’s not a matter of looking off in the future. If you’re not willing to die daily right now in order to get the job done, you’ll never be able to die someday as a martyr. And if you’re not willing to deny yourself in all the little ways every day to reach the lost, you’ll never be able to deny yourself in the end by a martyr’s death.

If you’re not willing to go and choose to die daily for Jesus right now, you may never be! And that begins on your block, getting out in your neighborhood, in your part of the world. As the lady said when she had to witness, “Oh, this just kills me!”

Well, that’s exactly what it should do: It should kill your pride, your selfishness, your egotism, and may even cause some considerable physical sacrifice. If you have lost that compulsion—that feeling that you just have to get out and make progress and keep moving or you’ll die, and if you don’t have that feeling anymore that you’d rather get out there and die for something rather than live for nothing—then you’ve lost the martyr spirit. That’s the real martyr spirit!

This daily dying is the hardest kind, because you do it a thousand times, whereas at the end of your life the final death is nothing by comparison. Your final death is your graduation! This slow death of dying a little each day—that’s what takes a lot of guts.

A young reporter once asked the leader of a well-known Eastern religion about his young followers and if he thought they were old enough to understand what it was all about. He wisely answered, “We’re all old. You’re old. You may die tomorrow. They’re old because their lives may be over tomorrow. So today we’re all old.” In other words, they’ve got to be old enough. Their lives may be over tomorrow.

“Boast not thyself of tomorrow.”3 It may not only be later than you think, but you may be older than you think. You’re counting on doing the job someday soon, but we’d better do it now!—Or we may never get it done.

The question I want to ask is: Are you getting in a rut? Are you turning sour, losing your fire, your convictions, your vision, your faith, your courage? And where is your initiative?

There’s nothing that succeeds like success. But at the same time, there’s nothing that fails faster than failure! You’re never so near the abyss, the deep, bottomless pit, as you are when you’re standing on the brink—on the mountaintop. When you’re on the top, it’s not only the most victorious place to be, but it’s the most dangerous. When you’re on the bottom, you have nothing to lose. There’s no way out but up, and the bottom is the safest place in the world. You’re nobody and nobody cares what you do.

There’s also such a thing as trying to go too fast. You get out of touch with the Lord. Some of you nearly work yourselves to death—you’re really killing yourselves! You have to take a vacation. God’s Word even tells us to. God couldn’t even trust them to stop their work one day a week to take the rest they needed. He had to make it a commandment and say, “Just take it off because I said so!”4 You’re going to burn out if you don’t.

You want to die daily, but you don’t want to die completely right now! It’s your business for God’s sake to stay alive so you can carry on, and this attitude of trying to kill yourself off quickly through your service to Him instead of trying to live as long as possible is not what God wants. You’re going to have to try to live a little longer to carry out what God wants.

The gruff, blustery, colorful, dramatic, outspoken, but highly successful General Patton is credited to have once said, contrary to popular opinion, that “It’s not the duty of every good soldier to die for his country, but to see that the other dumb bastard dies for his country!” In other words, although a good soldier must be willing to die for his cause, if necessary, it’s far better for him to learn how to live for it, how to stay alive and keep fighting, as you won’t be much good to anyone dead.

You have so much to do and so little time to do it in—so many things to take care of, so many people to take care of—that you work yourself to a frazzle and a frenzy trying to get everything done and take care of everything and everybody, that you’re going to find that you may very well be neglecting both God and God’s will.

If we’ve gotten the idea that our main job is to keep disciples and to grow in numbers, we have lost our whole goal. If you think that is our main objective, you have forgotten what it’s all about! Our job is to reach the ends of the earth with the Gospel—to get the message across. That’s our job. God helping us, I want to see us not fail.



Originally published September 1972. Updated and republished August 2012.
Read by Peter Amsterdam.


1 2 Corinthians 5:14.

2 1 Corinthians 15:31.

3 Proverbs 27:1.

4 Exodus 20:10–11.

Copyright © 2012 The Family International.

Riot leaves an Egyptian village without Christians


By Sarah El Deeb, AP, Aug 4, 2012


DAHSHOUR, Egypt (AP)—When the angry mob was rampaging through town, storming her home and those of other Christians, the 70-year-old woman hid in her cow pen, pushing a rock against the door. There she cowered for hours, at one point passing out from tear gas being fired by police that seeped in.

When Sameeha Wehba emerged just before dawn, she found she was the only Christian left in this small Egyptian village just south of Cairo.

Dahshour’s entire Christian community—as many as 100 families some estimate—fled to nearby towns in the violence earlier this week. The flock’s priest, cloaked in a white sheet to hide him, was taken out in a police van. At least 16 homes and properties of Christians were pillaged and some torched and a church damaged.

The violence was ultimately rooted in a dispute over a badly ironed shirt that escalated into a fight in which a Christian burned a Muslim to death, in turn sparking the rampage by angry Muslims.

“It was a devil’s moment,” Wehba said Thursday at the home of her Muslim neighbors, who have taken her in. “Whoever caused this was the devil’s son.”

The unprecedented exodus underscores how sectarian divisions that festered under decades of Hosni Mubarak’s rule are taking a turn to the worse, complicated by the problems of post-revolution Egypt, a country where 10 percent of the population are Christian.

Police forces have been weakened and often don’t carry out their duties. Islamists have been emboldened, with rhetoric fanning hatreds. In an atmosphere of lawlessness, Muslims and Christians alike feel freer in unleashing prejudices that in the past were kept barely under the surface.

Most notably in Dahshour, police did nothing as tensions spiraled following the burning of the Muslim man late last month.

While the man clung to life for several days, Muslim residents openly threatened to retaliate against all Christians. When the Muslim died Tuesday, the only solution from police was to encourage or assist in removing the Christian population before the violence erupted that night, Christians say. During the rampage, security forces acted to stop the crowd from storming the church, firing tear gas.

“What is grave this time is that violence was not only expected but preventable, and security forces failed to prevent it even though they had prior knowledge,” said Hossam Bahgat, head of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, which monitors sectarian violence.

In the past, incidents of sectarian violence in Egyptian towns often took a routine course. A local spat between a Muslim and Christian would escalate, and if a death occurred, violence would be sparked. Police would often see a bit of unrest as a way to let off steam but then negotiate a compromise solution over the death. Officials would deny any sectarian nature to the conflict.

In recent years, there have been cases where a whole Christian family was ordered by authorities to leave their hometown to prevent retaliation. At the same time, Christians have become more ready to use violence as a preventive measure when they fear they will be attacked, Bahgat said.

But uniquely in Dahshour, angry Muslims treated the entire Christian community as the family of the accused killer and subject to retaliation.

Egypt’s new president, Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, didn’t comment on the violence for several days. On Friday, he appealed to Dahshour’s Christians to return home, promising justice against perpetrators of the violence. But, echoing the line that Mubarak’s government always took for Muslim-Christian violence, he denied the incident was sectarian.

“This was an individual incident and its origin is not about Muslims and Christians, and it happens every day. It was blown out of proportion,” he said. Morsi’s spokesman denied the eviction was forced.

The village of 15,000 is tucked between several of Egypt’s most stunning ancient pyramids and surrounded by picturesque palm groves. Security trucks are now deployed on its winding, unpaved narrow roads to guard the church and empty Christian properties.

Many in the village say the Christians should not be allowed to return until the Christian laundry worker who set fire to the Muslim is killed. Some residents take an even harder line and say they shouldn’t be let back at all.

The sentiments were on display even in the neighboring Muslim family that took in Wehba to protect her in case of further reprisals.

Um Mohammed, the 65-year old matron of the household whose son was a friend of the slain man, says Christians can come back, but only if justice is served against the killer. “He burned my heart. He must also be burned. It is retribution,” she said.

“No Christian will return to this village again!” someone shouted from behind Umm Mohammed. It came from a little girl wearing a strict version of the Islamic headscarf, covering her head and much of her torso. The girl—apparently the child of a neighbor—was quickly shushed and hustled out of the room by the family.

“We didn’t kick them out for nothing,” said Ali el-Gizawy, a 47-year old government employee. “They betrayed our trust, and they will not be allowed to return.”

The Christians feel a mix of frustration at the incompetence of authorities, a sense of injustice and a fear their fate may be irreversible.

Kirollos Shehata, a 22-year old Coptic Christian resident, said he hadn’t wanted to leave but finally did as his Muslim neighbors and his own departing family members urged him to go with the others to avoid more violence.

“Now I can’t imagine going back,” he said. For him, it’s not fear of violence but a sense that the Christians humiliated themselves by leaving. “How would we look to the rest of the community and how will people treat us?” He spoke on condition his current location is not revealed.

The dispute began when the laundry man, Sameh, burned the shirt of his Muslim client, setting off an argument first with the client’s wife and then with the client himself, according to several residents. The argument turned violent. On July 26, an angry crowd gathered outside Sameh’s home, and he and his family lobbed firebombs down on them from his roof.

One man in the crowd, 27-year-old Moez Mohammed, was set aflame and was hospitalized with severe burns.

The next two days, Mohammed’s brothers and friends went down the village’s main Christian street, waving firebombs and threatening violence, Shehata said. When one Christian countered that the whole community was not to blame, a fight broke out, until it was broken up by neighbors.

“They said if you don’t leave the village, you will all die,” Shehata recalled. Aside from the anger over the young man’s death, there was economic jealousy because local Christians are seen as better off, he said. Moreover, some Islamists used the occasion to ignite deep-seated biases against Christians and their local priest and settle scores.

Among the Muslims, stories of Mohammed’s death circulated and grew more gruesome in the retelling.

“His eyes were on fire,” said a young boy in the house where Wehba was a guest. “He ran like a ball of fire,” said the boy’s grandmother. Another described his skin melting. Some said Mohammed had tried to break up the fight between Sameh and his client over the shirt; other said saved a little girl from the fire before he caught flame himself.

Meanwhile, Christian families began sending women and children out of the village, Shehata said.

When Mohammed died on Tuesday, those still there left and police escorted the priest out. After Mohammed’s burial in the evening, hundreds of Muslims began attacking the homes Christians left behind and tried to storm the church, located inside the priest’s house.

Wehba, the elderly woman who lives alone in her family home, was forgotten in the confusion.

“She is like one of us,” said Umm Mohammed, her host, adding that she sleeps next to Wehba to reassure her. “She has no one. And she has nothing to do with it.”

Israel's Fading Democracy


By Avraham Burg, NY Times, August 4, 2012

WHEN an American presidential candidate visits Israel and his key message is to encourage us to pursue a misguided war with Iran, declaring it “a solemn duty and a moral imperative” for America to stand with our warmongering prime minister, we know that something profound and basic has changed in the relationship between Israel and the United States.

My generation, born in the ’50s, grew up with the deep, almost religious belief that the two countries shared basic values and principles. Back then, Americans and Israelis talked about democracy, human rights, respect for other nations and human solidarity. It was an age of dreamers and builders who sought to create a new world, one without prejudice, racism or discrimination.

Listening to today’s political discourse, one can’t help but notice the radical change in tone. My children have watched their prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, kowtow to a fundamentalist coalition in Israel. They are convinced that what ties Israel and America today is not a covenant of humanistic values but rather a new set of mutual interests: war, bombs, threats, fear and trauma. How did this happen? Where is that righteous America? Whatever happened to the good old Israel?

Mr. Netanyahu’s great political “achievement” has been to make Israel a partisan issue and push American Jews into a corner. He has forced them to make political decisions based on calculations that go against what they perceive to be American interests. The emotional extortion compels Jews to pressure the Obama administration, a government with which they actually share values and worldviews, when those who love Israel should be doing the opposite: helping the American government to intervene and save Israel from itself.

Israel arose as a secular, social democratic country inspired by Western European democracies. With time, however, its core values have become entirely different. Israel today is a religious, capitalist state. Its religiosity is defined by the most extreme Orthodox interpretations. Its capitalism has erased much of the social solidarity of the past, with the exception of a few remaining vestiges of a welfare state. Israel defines itself as a “Jewish and democratic state.” However, because Israel has never created a system of checks and balances between these two sources of authority, they are closer than ever to a terrible clash.

In the early years of statehood, the meaning of the term “Jewish” was national and secular. In the eyes of Israel’s founding fathers, to be a Jew was exactly like being an Italian, Frenchman or American. Over the years, this elusive concept has changed; today, the meaning of “Jewish” in Israel is mainly ethnic and religious. With the elevation of religious solidarity over and above democratic authority, Israel has become more fundamentalist and less modern, more separatist and less open to the outside world. I see the transformation in my own family. My father, one of the founders of the state of Israel and of the National Religious Party, was an enlightened rabbi and philosopher. Many of the younger generation are far less open, however; some are ultra-Orthodox or ultranationalist settlers.

This extremism was not the purpose of creating a Jewish state. Immigrants from all over the world dreamed of a government that would be humane and safe for Jews. The founders believed that democracy was the only way to regulate the interests of many contradictory voices. Jewish culture, consolidated through Halakha, the religious Jewish legal tradition, created a civilization that has devoted itself to an unending conversation among different viewpoints and the coexistence of contradictory attitudes toward the fulfillment of the good.

The modern combination between democracy and Judaism was supposed to give birth to a spectacular, pluralistic kaleidoscope. The state would be a great, robust democracy that would protect Jews against persecution and victimhood. Jewish culture, on the other hand, with its uncompromising moral standards, would guard against our becoming persecutors and victimizers of others.

BUT something went wrong in the operating system of Jewish democracy. We never gave much thought to the Palestinian Israeli citizens within the Jewish-democratic equation. We also never tried to separate the synagogue and the state. If anything, we did the opposite. Moreover, we never predicted the evil effects of brutally controlling another people against their will. Today, all the things that we neglected have returned and are chasing us like evil spirits.

The winds of isolation and narrowness are blowing through Israel. Rude and arrogant power brokers, some of whom hold senior positions in government, exclude non-Jews from Israeli public spaces. Graffiti in the streets demonstrates their hidden dreams: a pure Israel with “no Arabs” and “no gentiles.” They do not notice what their exclusionary ideas are doing to Israel, to Judaism and to Jews in the diaspora. In the absence of a binding constitution, Israel has no real protection for its minorities or for their freedom of worship and expression.

If this trend continues, all vestiges of democracy will one day disappear, and Israel will become just another Middle Eastern theocracy. It will not be possible to define Israel as a democracy when a Jewish minority rules over a Palestinian majority between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea—controlling millions of people without political rights or basic legal standing.

This Israel would be much more Jewish in the narrowest sense of the word, but such a nondemocratic Israel, hostile to its neighbors and isolated from the free world, wouldn’t be able to survive for long.

But there is another option: an iconic conflict could also present an iconic solution. As in Northern Ireland or South Africa, where citizens no longer spill one another’s blood, it will eventually become clear that many Israelis are not willing to live in an ethnic democracy, not willing to give up on the chance to live in peace, not willing to be passive patriots of a country that expels or purifies itself of its minorities, who are the original inhabitants of the land.

Only on that day, after much anguish, boycotts and perhaps even bloodshed, will we understand that the only way for us to agree when we disagree is a true, vigorous democracy. A democracy based on a progressive, civil constitution; a democracy that enforces the distinction between ethnicity and citizenship, between synagogue and state; a democracy that upholds the values of freedom and equality, on the basis of which every single person living under Israel’s legitimate and internationally recognized sovereignty will receive the same rights and protections.

A long-overdue constitution could create a state that belongs to all her citizens and in which the government behaves with fairness and equality toward all persons without prejudice based on religion, race or gender. Those are the principles on which Israel was founded and the values that bound Israel and America together in the past. I believe that creating two neighboring states for two peoples that respect one another would be the best solution. However, if our shortsighted leaders miss this opportunity, the same fair and equal principles should be applied to one state for both peoples.

When a true Israeli democracy is established, our prime minister will go to Capitol Hill and win applause from both sides of the aisle. Every time the prime minister says “peace” the world will actually believe him, and when he talks about justice and equality people will feel that these are synonyms for Judaism and Israelis.

And for all the cynics who are smiling sarcastically as they read these lines, I can only say to Americans, “Yes, we still can,” and to Israelis, “If you will it, it is no dream.”

Avraham Burg, a former speaker of the Knesset, is the author of “The Holocaust Is Over: We Must Rise From Its Ashes” and the chairman of Molad, the Center for Renewal of Democracy.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith