Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Proteins: Life’s Molecular Machines

Proteins are huge molecules made by linking together hundreds, or even thousands, of different amino acids like beads on a long necklace. These proteins are not found in random arrangements, but are specifically designed to carry out unique biological functions. In order to function properly, they must have exactly the right amino acids, in exactly the right positions, and be of exactly the right length. It is the specific sequence of the ‘beads’ on a protein chain that allows each one to form the perfect 3-dimensional configuration needed to perform the required functions within our bodies.

It is estimated that the human body contains over 200,000 different proteins.1 The following description of proteins is given by molecular biologist Michael Denton: “If a cell were magnified a thousand million times...in every direction we looked, we would see all sorts of robot-like machines. We would notice that these simplest of the functional components of the cell -- the protein molecules -- were astonishingly, complex pieces of molecular machinery, each one consisting of about three thousand individual atoms arranged in highly organized 3-D spatial configurations…the task of designing even one such molecular machine - that is, a single functioning protein molecule - would be completely beyond our capacity...”2

One example of a very common protein is the hemoglobin molecule. Hemoglobin is a protein in our red blood cells that transports oxygen throughout our bodies. The molecule is perfectly designed to transport the optimal amount of oxygen in exactly the right way. If just one of the 287 amino acids which make up the hemoglobin molecule is out of place, an often fatal disease called sickle-cell anemia results. Because of this misplacement of just 1 out of 287 specific amino acids, the defective hemoglobin molecules bind together when the amount of oxygen in the bloodstream becomes low. This in turn stretches the red blood cells into a sickle shape which cannot easily flow through small blood vessels.

If this is the consequence of the misplacement of just one amino acid out of 287; how could all of the very specific proteins needed by the first form of life have developed by random chance processes? The simplest known form of life has over 100 different (and specific) proteins. These are all formed from only L-type amino acids and are arranged in a very specific order by the DNA molecule. Yet in the words of John Horgan, “The DNA cannot do its work, including forming more DNA, without the help of proteins. In short, proteins cannot form without DNA, but neither can DNA form without proteins.” This is the classic chicken or egg mystery. You need both to be present simultaneously because one cannot form without the other.

Further complicating the process is the fact that all laboratory experiments simulating the conditions necessary for the formation of life produce a random mixture of 50:50 R and L stereotypes. The odds of just one protein forming (such as the 287 amino acid hemoglobin molecule) with all L stereotypes, could be compared to flipping a coin and getting “heads” 287 times in a row. This could statistically only happen only once in every 10124 tries. Most scientists agree that any specific event with odds greater than 1050 will never happen. It gets even more impossible, though, because proteins are not just random molecules, but need all the amino acids to be in a specific order to function correctly. The odds of getting the specific 100 proteins required for the simplest form of life, with all L stereotypes, and all in the specific order needed, is greater than 1/1010,000. Yet, a single human body uses not a mere 100, but 100,000 such specifically designed proteins!

These outlandish odds demonstrate the scientific impossibility of the formation of life by chance reactions. However, these problems are almost never presented in textbooks. Our children deserve better than an indoctrination which ignores these overwhelming problems.

1. James Perloff, Tornado in a Junkyard, Refuge, 1999, p. 66.

2. Michael Denton, Evolution:A theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler, p. 328. 3. John Horgan, “In the Beginning”, Scientific American, 2/91, p. 119.

Witnessing

By David Brandt Berg

Download Audio (7.04MB)

“Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature” is not an option. It’s a commandment. The message is clear. There’s no denying it or excusing ourselves. We must simply have the faith to obey, even if it means going out not knowing whither we go.1

Jesus made it quite clear that all Christians are ordained to preach the Gospel when He said in John 15:16, “Ye have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit.”

Therefore, it is not just a nice thing to do when we feel like it or can find the time, but it is the God-given job and responsibility of all of His true children, as Paul expressed, “For though I preach the Gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me: yea, woe is unto me if I preach not the Gospel.”2

This is why we devote our time and energies to preaching the Gospel to every creature and winning their souls to Jesus Christ and His service for others.3 That’s what we’re here for: to win people to Christ! For “herein is My Father glorified, that ye bearmuch fruit; so shall ye be My disciples.”4

Regardless of nationality, country, color, or creed, the heart of man is the same the world over, and his heartaches and sorrows and sins and pains and fear of death are the same. His longings, loves, and hunger for God and His truth, for joy and happiness and peace of mind, are God-created, and the same in men the world over.

Even though many people are seeking genuine love, they seldom, if ever, find it. For there are never enough of God’s people who are willing to show them His real love. As Jesus Himself said, “The harvest truly is plenteous, but the laborers are few. Therefore,” He commanded, “pray ye the Lord of the harvest, that He will send forth laborers into His harvest.”5

Only the supernatural, miracle-working power of the Holy Spirit of God Himself can do the job and win their hearts, bring them to a decision, and cause them to be bornagain as new creatures. Therefore, God has promised an anointing of this very power to His witnesses to help them lead others to Him. “Ye shall receive power after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you. And ye shall be witnesses unto Me.”6 The purpose of the power is for witnessing.

We’ve got nothing but God, so let’s show them His Spirit! As Paul said, “My speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: that your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.”7 It’s this fiery anointing that counts.

If you haven’t got the fire, I don’t care how “good” a witness you are; it’s just cold, dead icicles of facts and figures, and you’ll never set anyone else on fire without it! As Jesus said, “Without Me, ye can do nothing.”8

But if you do your part, and “abide in the vine,” yielding yourself to Him in submission and humility, then the Lord will do His part, and inspire you, or fill you with His Spirit, so you can “bear much fruit”—newborn babes into the kingdom of God.9

As a young preacher with real love for the lost and a sincere desire to try to win the lost the churches had failed to reach, I tried everything I could think of, dreamed up every method I could imagine to try to carry the Gospel to them. I preached on the streets and in the parks; I sang at the top of my voice; I showed pictures and movies anywhere I possibly could—to reach people with the message of God’s love! But it was still the meeting method and the mass evangelism approach, which only had moderate success.

Then, one day I found out the exciting truth and thrilling fact that you could win more souls witnessing individually to individual people wherever you could find them, anywhere, any time, all the time, everywhere to everybody! You have to search them out individually, personally, with tender loving care and personal attention. Jesus said that the good shepherd “calleth his own sheep by name (personally, individually) and leadeth them out.”10

As children of God, you should have love and compassion for everyone—young or old, rich or poor, strong or weak, even if you don’t like them—“every creature!” However, God’s Spirit will lead you especially to those who really need your loving help, and who will respond in appreciation, just as the Spirit will also lead them to you.

God’s Spirit goes where there are open and receptive hearts that are hungry. He seeks the low and the humble and the contrite heart, but resists the proud. His Word says, “The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit. He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich (or full) He hath sent empty away. … For God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble.”11

In leading people to the Lord, you often have to inspire their faith in you before they can believe in God. You are their link with God. As Jesus said, “He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth Me; and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me.”12

You must establish points of contact with them. There must be something in common in order for people to communicate. Use the kind of language that will win them. If it takes strong language to get the point across, use it! If it takes sweeter language, use that. Ask God for wisdom.13

One of the most needed abilities in witnessing is adaptability: being able to beanything to reach anybody and to become all things to all men. This tactic of adaptability was largely responsible for much of the apostle Paul’s soul-winning success. He said, “To the Jews, I became as a Jew; that I might gain (win) the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them. ... I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.”14

Sometimes, all people need is for someone to listen, and that’s half the job of being a witness. Let’s not fail them in showing them we’re willing to listen to their troubles. Often they’re really hungriest for fellowship and companionship and real love and sympathy, just somebody to talk to, to relieve their loneliness and to feel like somebody cares and shares their misery and their needs and problems.

(Prophecy:) “Can you not hear the heartcry of their bosom? To love is to weep with them, to cry with them, to suffer with them that suffer, and to feel the agony of heart with them whose hearts are broken!”

Originally published May 1975. Updated and republished September 2012.
Read by Peter Amsterdam.


1 Hebrews 11:8.

2 1 Corinthians 9:16. See also Ezekiel 3:17–19.

3 Mark 16:15.

4 John 15:8.

5 Matthew 9:37–38.

6 Acts 1:8.

7 1 Corinthians 2:4–5.

8 John 15:5.

9 See John 15:1–8.

10 John 10:3.

11 Psalm 34:18; Luke 1:53; 1 Peter 5:5.

12 John 13:20.

13 James 1:5.

14 1 Corinthians 9:20, 22.

Obama's America: Waiting for Blowback

Posted: 01 Sep 2012 03:45 AM PDT

By Nicolas J.S. Davies, Huffington Post, Aug. 30, 2012
The United States has suffered three widely acknowledged military disasters since the end of the Second World War: in Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. The American public responded to each crisis by electing new leaders with a mandate to end the wars and avoid new ones. But in each case, our new leaders failed to make the genuine recommitment to peace and diplomacy that was called for. Instead, they allayed the fears of the public by moving American war-making farther into the shadows, deploying the CIA and special operations forces in covert operations and proxy wars, sowing seeds of violence and injustice that would fester for decades and often erupt into conflict many years later.

Six months after taking office, President Eisenhower signed an armistice agreement to end the Korean War. But three weeks later, he unleashed the CIA’s first covert operation, to overthrow the elected government of Iran. The nationalization of Iran’s oil industry was reversed and U.S. oil companies gained a substantial share of Iran’s oil production. Problem solved, right? Not exactly—the U.S. coup and its support for the Shah’s despotic rule led to the 1979 Iranian Revolution and a hostage crisis at the U.S. Embassy. Now the long-term breakdown of diplomatic relations between the United States and Iran threatens to explode into a new American war.

A year later, the CIA followed up on its “success” in Iran by removing another elected leader, Jacobo Arbenz Guzman of Guatemala. The coup rescued United Fruit Company’s ownership of 42% of the agricultural land in Guatemala from Arbenz’s modest efforts at land reform, but the 42-year civil war that followed killed at least 250,000 people.

The U.S. defeat in Vietnam led to ten years of relative peace, in which the U.S. avoided open warfare anywhere in the world. But once again, this concealed what senior U.S. military officers have called the “disguised, quiet, media-free” approach to war in Central America and Afghanistan. Proxy forces armed with American weapons and supported by small numbers of American “advisers” once again plunged millions of people’s lives into chaos.

In El Salvador and Nicaragua, the political parties the U.S. fought in the 1980s have eventually won elections and come to power anyway. And in Afghanistan, mujaheddin that the U.S. armed and supported in the 1980s produced the most dramatic act of “blowback” ever on September 11th 2001, plunging America into a decade or more of war, economic crisis and global chaos that we have yet to find our way out of.

President Obama fulfilled the U.S. commitment to withdraw from Iraq that the Maliki government wrung out of the Bush administration, and he stopped the CIA from kidnapping people and bundling them off to Guantanamo. But even after his much-vaunted “withdrawal” from Afghanistan, there will still be twice as many U.S. troops there as when he took office. And he halted the parade of men in orange jump suits stumbling off American planes into the tropical sunshine in Cuba, not by restoring the rule of law, but by ordering the extra-judicial execution of terrorism suspects—a national policy of cold-blooded murder.

Not a week goes by without news of U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan or Yemen, but the U.S. also conducts assassinations by helicopter-borne special forces like the ones who killed Osama Bin Laden. The former head of Special Operations Command (SOCOM), Admiral Eric Olson, told an Aspen Institute conference that SOCOM conducts a dozen such operations every night in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The total number of night raids in Afghanistan escalated from twenty per month in early 2009 to over a thousand per month two years later, and senior officers admit that at least half of them target the wrong person or house.

Sixty thousand U.S. special operations forces now conduct assassinations, night-raids, training missions, joint operations and exercises in 120 countries around the world, twice as many as when Obama came to power, with deployments in about 70 countries at any given time.

In The Politics of Heroin, Alfred McCoy described how the CIA formed secret alliances with Nationalist Chinese generals in Burma and Thailand, Corsican gangsters in Marseilles, Afghan warlords, Haitian military officers, Manuel Noriega in Panama and Nicaraguan Contra commanders. In every case, the CIA’s partners exploited their impunity as U.S. allies to become major players in the global drug trade. Now former Mexican special forces trained at Fort Bragg and Fort Benning run the Zetas drug cartel, and the new police chief installed by a U.S. offensive in Kandahar province in Afghanistan in 2011 reportedly earns $60 million a year from opium smuggling.

The current expansion of U.S. special forces to conduct covert and proxy warfare sacrifices U.S. long term interests in peace, stability and the rule of law for short-term political gain, just as when U.S. “advisers” were sent to Vietnam in the 1950s and to Central America and Afghanistan in the 1980s. But which of the 120 countries where U.S. special forces now operate will become the next Vietnam or Iran or Guatemala?

Could it be India, which holds 50 joint training exercises a year with U.S. forces, the most of any country in the world, as it battles separatists in Kashmir and Assam and a “people’s war” by Naxalites or Maoists in 7 other provinces?

Or what about Uganda, Burundi, Sierra Leone, Djibouti or Kenya, where U.S. forces are training African Union “peacekeepers” to fight the Al-Shabab militia in Somalia? Or the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Central African Republic or South Sudan, where U.S. special forces have been sent to track down Joseph Kony but are suspected of planning a covert war against Sudan?

The pervasiveness and perversity of America’s military madness could produce severe “blowback” from any one of the 120 countries where U.S. special forces now operate. So how will we respond when the inevitable blowback comes? Will we once again fall in line as our leaders lash out at some new enemy? Or will we know enough of our own history to look in the mirror and recognize the real source of the violence and chaos that our irresponsible leaders keep unleashing on the world?

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Book on Bin Laden Killing Contradicts U.S. Account


Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:43 AM PDT

By Eric Schmitt, NY Times, August 29, 2012

WASHINGTON—A new first-person account of the Navy SEALs raid that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan last year contradicts the Obama administration’s previous descriptions of the mission, raising questions about whether the leader of Al Qaeda posed a clear threat to the commandos who fired on him.


According to the account in the book, “No Easy Day,” which will go on sale next week under the pseudonym Mark Owen, Bin Laden was shot in the head when he peered out of his bedroom door into a top-floor hallway of his compound as the SEALs rushed up a narrow stairwell toward him.


The author, whom military officials have identified as Matt Bissonnette, 36, said he was directly behind the “point man,” or lead commando, as the SEALs followed Bin Laden into the room, where they found him on the floor at the foot of his bed with “blood and brains spilled out of the side of his skull,” and two women wailing over his body, which was “still twitching and convulsing.”


The author said he and another member then trained their weapons on Bin Laden’s chest and fired several rounds, until he was motionless. The SEALs later found two unloaded weapons—an AK-47 rifle and a Makarov pistol—near the bedroom door.


In the administration’s version of events, the lead commando’s shot in the stairwell missed, and the SEALs confronted Bin Laden in the bedroom, killing him with one shot to the chest and another above the left eye.


The new book’s account, if true, raises the question of whether Bin Laden posed a clear threat in his death throes.


Military officials have said that the SEALs made split-second decisions, fearing that Bin Laden, though unarmed, could have exploded a suicide vest or other booby trap. Critics, however, say that while the military has described the raid as a “kill or capture” mission, there was virtually no chance the SEALS would bring Bin Laden back alive.


The Pentagon and the White House declined to comment on the new account, reflecting at least in part the administration’s reluctance to reopen an issue at a time when Republicans have accused the administration of exploiting the raid’s success to burnish President Obama’s national security credentials during his re-election campaign.


Elsewhere in the book, the author states that members of the SEALs unit were not “huge fans of Obama,” although they respected the commander in chief for authorizing the operation. “We just got this guy re-elected,” the author quotes another member of the unit, identified by the pseudonym Walt, as saying.


The Associated Press and The Huffington Post reported the new account of Bin Laden’s death on Wednesday after purchasing copies of the book. The New York Times obtained a copy later on Wednesday.


In response to a crush of news media attention, criticism and consumer demand, Dutton, the imprint of Penguin that acquired the book in secret, said this week that it was moving up the book’s planned Sept. 11 release date by one week, to Tuesday. Demand for the 336-page book has been enormous; it is currently No. 1 on the best-seller lists at Amazon.com and BN.com.

Friday, August 31, 2012

Chinese Language Reveals Creation


One of the primary characteristics that separate human behavior from animals’ is the ability to transfer abstract concepts to another human via written language. The Bible teaches that this ability came directly from our Creator. It also teaches that the vastly different languages of the world are a result of the confusion of one original language during an event known as the tower of Babel. Our English word babble (meaning gibberish, chatter, nonsense) has it roots in this event. Modern scientific studies really have no better explanation because it is still a mystery how totally different languages could have developed by any natural process.

There should be accounts in ancient cultures for Biblical events such as the creation of man, the fall of man, the existence of a single creator (God), the world wide flood, and the tower of Babel; if these were actual happenings in time and space. Knowledge of all these events can be found not just in the Bible, but in the ancient writings of people throughout the world.

One of the more interesting collaborations can be found within the very characters of ancient Chinese letter symbols. Ancient Chinese writing consisted of a series of word pictures or pictographs which combined separate features to express an idea or concept. Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism dominate the religious beliefs of China today. However, 2000 years before the appearance of any of these religious beliefs, the ancient Chinese served a single creator god known as “Shang Ti”. The symbol for Shang Ti (God) is a combination of the symbol for emperor and the symbol for heaven (or above).



Thus, the original God worshiped by the Chinese was a single heavenly emperor (not many gods).



The Bible states that God created man from the dust of the ground and breathed into him the breath of life. This is presented as a factual event and the original Biblical language is not poetry, but a narrative description of a literal event. We even read in Matthew that Jesus Christ referred to this event as a true happening rather than a symbolic concept, “Have you not read that in the beginning He made them man and women.” The ancient Chinese symbol for create is a combination of person (or breath), dust, walking, and alive.



Thus, to create, is to have dust walk, breathe, and live.



The Bible further describes a world wide flood catastrophe in which all human life with the exception of eight individuals on a floating vessel were destroyed. The ancient Chinese symbol for ‘boat’ is vessel, eight, and people.



Thus, a boat is eight people on board of a vessel!



The Bible again states that man was told to spread out over the earth after the worldwide flood. Yet, he rebelled and built a tower to his own glory. God ended this rebellion by confusing man’s language so that the people set out and journeyed across the globe in different language groups. Interestingly, the ancient Chinese chose to use the identical symbol for confusion and rebellion ... a combination of tongue and right leg (or journey).



Thus, to confuse is to set out on a journey with a new tongue (or language).



These are just a few of the many examples of the historical knowledge of the Bible that the ancient Chinese people must have had as they developed their written language. Many more examples can be found in an excellent book by C.H. Kang and Ethel Nelson called The Discovery of Genesis.

The Inevitable Extinction of Humanity

By Bruce Malone

For the last 200 years, science has increasingly become ruled by a single “prime directive.” Those who remember the original Star Trek series will recall that every starship in the Federation fleet was bound by one unbreakable rule—they were never to interfere with the development of another culture. In a similar way, one unbreakable rule guides all modern scientific endeavors. Richard Dickerson, a prominent biochemist and member of the elite National Academy of Sciences, states it this way, “Science, fundamentally is a game. It is a game with one overriding and defining rule: Let us see how far and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes, without ever invoking the supernatural... A chess player is perfectly capable of moving his opponent’s king physically from the board and smashing it in the midst of a tournament. This would not make him the champion because the rules have not been followed.” 1

It is because of the “prime directive” of science (i.e. we must explain everything via evolution) that no matter how conclusive the evidence for our recent creation, it will not be acknowledged. Further-more, the evidence pointing to this reality will be buried, ignored, and at times not even seen by those whose paradigm of reality is that the prime directive must be upheld even at the cost of intellectual honesty.

For the last 50 years, it has been acknowledged that if there is more than one minor mistake on the genetic code of a species per generation, that species is ultimately doomed to extinction. For instance, if cockroaches have been around for 300 million years and they have one minor random change to their DNA every generation, over a billion meaningless mistakes would have built up - dooming them to extinction. No mechanism exists which can eliminate these minor mistakes. Natural selection can act as a quality control mechanism which can eliminate individuals with major genetic problems because such offspring are less fit for survival. However, natural selection cannot remove mistakes in the genetic code that build up having minimal survival effect.

For instance, suppose our genetic code was similar to a textbook full of information and each subsequent copy of the textbook had a few letters randomly changed. Natural selection would be like the test taken by everyone who had read each unique textbook with its individual set of errors. Very few, if any of the textbooks, could be eliminated based on the results of end of the year student testing. The next generation of books would have a few more errors, and the third generation a few more..etc...until the textbook ultimately became meaningless nonsense. Yet, for any given textbook generation, natural selection (the testing of students using all of the textbooks from that generation of books) would have no ability to eliminate any but the most blatantly erroneous textbooks. This is why it has been acknowledged that more than one minor error per generation will ultimately doom a species to extinction due to the “genetic load” of errors building up on its DNA code.2

It is not widely reported that every generation of humans has not one random error in their DNA code but thousands of random and permanent changes. These random changes are actually a loss of functioning information—the same way that random changes in the letters of a textbook result in the loss of information content.

The obvious question of ‘where did all of the original information come from?’ is also being ignored, as is the rate of detrimental changes -- orders of magnitude greater than any yet to be identified source of adding information. Furthermore, the rate at which mistakes are increasing on the human genome provides compelling evidence that the human genome cannot possibly have been around more than a few hundred generations nor can it survive indefinitely.

Never has there been so much scientific evidence supporting the reality that humans were recently created by an unimaginably intelligent designer. It is this evidence which makes it obvious that our hope lies not in this life nor in this physical universe—which is winding down, not up. Our hope lies in reconciling ourselves with the designer of this universe and in what He has done to provide for us in the eternity which will follow our physical extinction.

1. Dr. Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Simon & Schuster,

p. 240, 1998.

2. Dr. J.C. Sanford, Genetic Entropy: The Mystery of the Genome, Ivan Press, 2005.

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Homenaje a la amistad

María Fontaine

Cuando se muda una persona, un amigo cercano, algunos sin querer, preguntamos: «Si Dios me ama tanto, ¿por qué permite que me dejen mis amigos más cercanos? Necesito mucho a esa persona. Ahora que no está conmigo, tengo una sensación de pérdida, de que me falta algo. Señor, ¿por qué no hiciste que fuera de otra forma?»

Es probable que los discípulos de Jesús se sintieran de forma muy parecida. Al fin y al cabo, imagínense la sensación de pérdida que tendrían cuando Jesús los dejó. Jesús, el Hijo de Dios, que había estado con ellos día tras día, enseñándoles a amar, prodigándoles instrucción, aleccionándolos para que supieran cómo comunicarse sabiamente con los demás y llevar a cabo la misión, apoyándolos, ayudándolos, escuchándolos, consolándolos. Él era todo para ellos, ¡compartió todo lo que tenía con ellos! ¿Pueden imaginarse una pérdida mayor que esa? Deben haber sentido un desgarro emocional, una sensación de pérdida y de incertidumbre en cuanto a cómo seguirían adelante sin Él.

Tengo la certeza de que esos días en aquel aposento alto fueron momentos de gran búsqueda interior, de tratar de entender todas las preguntas que deben haberles pesado tanto en el corazón. Sin embargo, cuando miraron al Espíritu Santo para que les diera consuelo —a quien Jesús les dijo que enviaría—, encontraron la fe y el valor para seguir adelante y llevar a cabo lo que Jesús confiaba que harían. Sabían que no podían fallarle, aunque Él ya no estuviera con ellos físicamente y aunque sintieran una gran pérdida. Con la ayuda del Espíritu Santo, hallaron consuelo y el ungimiento para llevar a cabo Su obra. ¡Fíjense en lo que sucedió cuando Sus discípulos empezaron a atender a quienes necesitaban el amor y la vida que Jesús les había dado! El Espíritu obró poderosamente por medio de ellos. Con esa experiencia, se acercaron más que nunca a Jesús, porque todo lo que Él les había entregado empezó a crecer y a manifestarse abundantemente en otros por medio de ellos.

Nuestras amistades son versiones en miniatura del mismo principio. Cuando Dios permite que se rompa el círculo por un tiempo —a veces hasta que lleguemos al cielo—, nuestras amistades tienen la posibilidad de empezar su propia reacción en cadena que afecte y mejore la vida de muchos, y también la nuestra con creces. El vínculo de amistad que ustedes tienen con alguien es una manifestación del amor de Jesús; Su Espíritu fluye a través de ustedes y hacia ellos; y a través de ellos hacia ustedes.

Lo mejor que pueden hacer para manifestar el cariño que le tienen a un amigo es hacer que la vida de ustedes sea un ejemplo vivo de todo lo que esa persona significa para ustedes, y todo lo que esa amistad les ha traído. Cuando aprovechan toda la belleza, bondad, amabilidad y enseñanzas que aprendieron juntos, se convierte en un testimonio vivo de su amistad, lo que atrae a otros y hace que esa amistad tenga un significado incluso mayor.

El Señor dio unas palabras bellas y consoladoras acerca de la amistad; quiero reproducirlas en este documento.

Jesús dice:

«Aprovecha lo que esta amistad te ha enseñado, lo valioso que adquirieron el uno del otro; y toma la determinación de demostrar el cariño que tienes por ese amigo al emplear todo lo has ganado. Lo que tu amigo te ha dado y que ha compartido contigo se ha vuelto parte de ti y seguirá bendiciéndote a ti y a otros. Es el regalo que te ha entregado ese amigo. El regalo que le des a tu amigo es emplear todo eso, de modo que se multiplique lo que esa amistad les ha ofrecido.

»Descubrirás que una parte de ese viejo amigo se mantiene viva y crece en tu vida, de modo que seas una mejor persona, una persona más prudente. Es la manera perfecta de mantener viva esa amistad en tu corazón. Válete de eso para entablar amistad con tantas personas como puedas. Así, la amistad se vuelve total de verdad.

»Esa es una razón por la que hay gran y potente unidad en el Cielo. Todos los lazos de amistad y de amor que creas en la Tierra se convierten en un gozo eterno para ti en el Cielo. Allí te darás cuenta que jamás has perdido un amigo, sino que la partida de cada uno en el plano físico causó que se iniciara la comunicación, tanto contigo como por medio de ti, con todos los amigos que habrás tenido en esta vida.

»Si tienes amigos que siguen contigo o que están cerca, aprecia su valor. Si tienes amigos que se van o que se han ido, o si te mudarás y te despedirás, festeja la cercanía que han tenido y el regalo que ha sido; y esfuérzate por cultivar otras relaciones parecidas.»

A continuación reproducimos algunas frases acerca de la amistad. Ya sea que tengas amigos que se hayan trasladado a otro continente, que se hayan ido al Cielo a estar con Jesús, que sean viejos amigos o nuevas amistades, que uno te acompañe y otro esté ausente, o que pienses en Jesús, tu mejor amigo, estas reflexiones pueden ayudarte a que te concentres en el bello regalo que nos da Dios: la amistad.

*

Un amigo verdadero es un regalo de Dios; y solo Él, que creó los corazones, puede unirlos. Robert South

*

Al decir «amistad» se intenta expresar el mayor amor, el desinterés más extremo, la comunicación más abierta, los sufrimientos más nobles, la verdad más seria, el consejo más sincero y la mayor unión de pareceres de la que son capaces los hombres y las mujeres valientes. Jeremy Taylor

*


Un amigo fiel es un refugio seguro; el que lo halla ha encontrado un tesoro. Libro de Sirácides 6:14

*

Un amigo puede considerarse la obra maestra de la naturaleza. Ralph Waldo Emerson

*

Amistad: Ser una mano fuerte en la oscuridad para alguien en tiempos de necesidad. Hugh Black

*

La amistad requiere que haya una gran comunicación entre amigos. De lo contrario, no puede ni nacer ni existir. San Francisco de Sales

*

La amistad es una responsabilidad, no una oportunidad. Benjamín Franklin

*

Un verdadero amigo se desahoga con franqueza, aconseja con justicia, ayuda de buena gana, se aventura con audacia, acepta todo con paciencia, defiende con valor, y no deja de ser un amigo indiscutible. William Penn

*

Cultiva las cualidades que deseas que tenga un amigo, porque alguien quiere que seas su amigo. Anónimo

*

¡Ah!, el consuelo indescriptible de sentirse a salvo en compañía de una persona; no tener que sopesar las ideas ni medir las palabras, sino expresarlas todas —como son, paja y grano juntos—, sabiendo que una mano fiel las tomará y las pasará por el tamiz, guardará lo que tenga valor y, luego, con un soplo de bondad, eliminará el resto. George Eliot

*

Para el mundo, eres solo una persona. Sin embargo, podrías serlo todo para una persona. Anónimo

*

Los buenos amigos se parecen a las estrellas. No siempre los ves, pero sabes que siempre están ahí. Anónimo

*

Un amigo es alguien que te da fuerzas con oraciones, te bendice con amor y te anima infundiéndote esperanza. Anónimo

*

No necesitamos tanto de la ayuda de nuestros amigos como de la confianza en esa ayuda. Epicuro

*

Mi mejor amigo es el que saca lo mejor de mí. A quien le puedo decir: «Me gusto más cuando estoy contigo». Anónimo

*

La amistad que brota del corazón no puede congelarse debido a la adversidad, al igual que el agua que mana de un arroyo no puede congelarse en el invierno. James Fenimore Cooper

*

El amigo es aquel que es como otro yo. Cicerón

*

Caminar con un amigo en la oscuridad es mejor que caminar solo en la luz. Helen Keller

*

Los amigos son el medio por el que Dios nos cuida. Anónimo

*

Los amigos son como ángeles que nos siguen por la vida. Anónimo

*

Cada amigo representa un mundo en nuestro interior. Un mundo que tal vez no surge hasta la llegada de ese amigo; solo en ese encuentro nace un nuevo mundo. Anais Nin

*

Ningún amor, ni amistad, puede cruzar la senda de nuestro destino sin dejar una huella eterna. Francois Mocuriac

*

Fue una gran bendición haber conocido a alguien a quien me costó decirle adiós. Anónimo

*

Todos tomamos distintos caminos en la vida, pero a donde sea que vayamos, llevamos un poquito unos de otros. Tim McGraw

*

Ni tiempo ni distancia pueden disminuir la amistad de quienes están mutuamente convencidos de su valía. Anónimo

*

El descubrimiento más bello que pueden hacer los amigos de verdad es que pueden crecer por separado, sin distanciarse. Elisabeth Foley

*

Entre amigos no hay distancia excesivamente grande, pues el amor le da alas al corazón. Anónimo

*

Con cada amigo que amo y que ha sido trasladado a las oscuras entrañas de la tierra, una parte de mí ha quedado enterrada allí. Sin embargo, la contribución de ellos a mi felicidad, fortaleza y comprensión, me sigue sosteniendo en un mundo cambiado. Helen Keller

*

Los verdaderos amigos nunca se alejan; tal vez los separe la distancia, pero siguen unidos de corazón. Anónimo

*

VER que has perdido un ser querido.
INVERTIR en otros las bendiciones de la amistad.
DETERMINAR que las amistades perdidas viven en nosotros y en quienes se cruzan en nuestro camino.
ATAR lazos eternos de amistad que rodeen a los demás y perduren por siempre. Anónimo

*

Los recuerdos son eternos; jamás mueren. Los amigos permanecen unidos y nunca se despiden para siempre. Anónimo

Artículo publicado por primera vez en diciembre de 2011 y actualizado en septiembre de 2012. Traducción: Victoria Martínez y Antonia López.

Eu Te Amo! – Você Pessoalmente!

Maria Fontaine

Fiquei muito triste quando ouvi dizer que alguns de vocês às vezes acham que o Senhor está distante, que não passa de um Poderoso em algum lugar na atmosfera que certa vez expressou o Seu amor por meio do imenso sacrifício de Seu Filho -- mas que na realidade Ele não está muito interessado em você pessoalmente, nos seus problemas, nas situações que o deixam triste e confuso, amedrontado, sem esperança ou sozinho.

Talvez sinta que Jesus o ama de maneira genérica, mas não entende como Ele poderia amá-lo de forma calorosa, íntima e pessoal como o seu melhor amigo, ou alguém apaixonado por você que quer participar de cada detalhezinho da sua vida, conhecer todos os seus pensamentos, seus mais profundos desejos e ficar na sua companhia o tempo todo. Alguém que deseja fazê-lo feliz, que está sempre pensando em você e em como suprir suas maiores necessidades, sem deixar o amor que sente por você ser afetado por seus erros e falhas, muito pelo contrário, olhando além deles e vendo o seu coração.

Você não entende como Jesus haveria de querer realmente se sintonizar em cada aspecto da sua vida, em todos os detalhes relativos a você apenas e garantir que supre cada pequena necessidade, sempre ao seu lado, pronto para acolhê-lo em Seus braços e consolá-lo quando está triste, participar de sua alegria, acalmá-lo e espantar os temores, e explicar situações e coisas que o perturbam.

Eu já ouvi pessoas dizendo, “Não entendo como Jesus poderia me amar tanto assim ou estar feliz comigo. Sou ruim demais. Já cometi tantos erros! Não consigo superar meus problemas pessoais, além de que não tenho nenhum talento… Sou incapaz de fazer grande coisa pelo Senhor. Eu me sinto um zero à esquerda. Tem um monte de gente melhor do que eu que pode fazer o trabalho do Senhor e que Ele deve amar muito mais.”

Fico de coração quebrado quando ouço que alguém diz isso ou sequer pensa isso, pois sei o quanto Jesus ama cada um individualmente de uma maneira muito especial e profunda. Para mim uma das coisas mais lastimáveis neste mundo é alguém não entender e não saber o quanto Jesus o ama.

São muitas as manifestações do grande amor do Senhor por cada um de nós. Primeiro, Ele morreu por nós. E também designou a cada um onde testemunhar e servir a Ele de uma maneira específica e sob medida. Ele o chamou e escolheu. O maravilhoso conselho e instrução que o Senhor nos deus na Bíblia e em outros escritos inspirados, sem falar dos conselhos que dá continuamente em profecia para os que desejam é uma outra grande manifestação do Seu amor presente no nosso dia a dia. Além do mais, o Senhor quer que saiba que cada pessoa é ímpar e especial, e que Ele Se preocupa com cada mínimo detalhe da sua vida intimamente, assim como o faz com outros especificamente.

Jesus disse:

“Nem um passarinho cai ao chão sem que o seu Pai o saiba.”[1] E você não vale muito mais do que as aves? Meu querido, peça e receberá, para que o seu gozo se cumpra.[2] Desejo preencher o seu coração com o Meu amor e gozo inefável. Eu o amo com um amor eterno. Você é especial para Mim.[3] Você, Meu precioso pequenino é querido para Mim.

Não dê ouvidos ao Maligno que deseja afastá-lo de Mim, pois Eu o amo de verdade. Venha, fique Comigo na Palavra e manifestarei o Meu amor por você. Se permanecer em mim o Meu amor se manifestará e, conforme você der, também receberá.[4] Encha o seu coração com o Meu amor por meio da Minha Palavra. Farei milagres por você e verá toda a alegria que lhe tenho preparada, além do Meu amor inescrutável.

*

Meu queridíssimo, ouço os seus pensamentos, e conheço os seus mais profundos anelos, temores e inseguranças. Ouço tudo e a todos conheço. Você vive como se precisasse provar algo aos outros, acha que estou distante por causa das suas falhas, erros e pecados, considera-se ruim demais. Acha que o castigo por essas coisas e que não poderia jamais amá-lo incondicionalmente.

Tenta fazer o que é certo, ser bom, falar de Mim para os outros. No entanto, às vezes acha que estou muito distante e não consigo ouvi-lo, não falo com você nem Me importo. Mas fico muito triste ao ver que nutre esse tipo de pensamento. Nada poderia estar mais longe dos meus verdadeiros sentimentos por você!

Você é o Meu amado em quem Me comprazo! Por favor, renuncie a essas dúvidas! Encha-se com o Meu Espírito. Você é muito precioso para Mim e o amo muito. Mas é preciso rechaçar essas mentiras para poder vivenciar o Meu amor. Precisa lançá-los fora! Precisa dar o passo de fé de acreditar que o amo.

Conheço os seus erros, mas o amo assim mesmo. Sei dos seus pecados, mas não o desamparo. Estou bem ao seu lado e cuido de você. Fico triste, muito triste quando você não acredita nisso, não aceita o Meu amor nem Me inclui na sua vida. Acha que é culpa minha que se sente tão distante de Mim, mas não é. Eu amo você! Precisa acreditar que não estou tão longe assim. Eu não quero castigá-lo. Você não precisa ser bom o suficiente para Mim nem se esforçar tanto para sentir-se digno do Meu amor. Você édigno. Mas isso não importa, pois o amo de qualquer forma.

Pare de tentar ser bom o suficiente para Mim, pois jamais conseguirá. Jamais conseguirá fazer o suficiente, mas isso não tem nada a ver. Eu o amo exatamente como você é. Não precisa se preocupar. Venha aqui e ficaremos juntinhos conversando e desfrutando da companhia um do outro. Serei para você mais do que uma luz e melhor do que um caminho conhecido.[5]

Publicado originalmente em janeiro de 1995. Atualizado e republicado em agosto de 2012. Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli. Revisão Denise Oliveira.


[1] Mateus 10:29.

[2] João 16:24.

[3] Jeremias 31:3.

[4] João 15:4; Lucas 6:38.

[5] Lucas 1:79.

No Chance of Life By Chance


In the 1700’s, many scientists believed that life spontaneously generated from non-living matter (such as raw meat or sewage). In the 1800’s, using careful experimentation, Louis Pasteur proved this concept wrong and verified that life only comes from previously existing life. Ironically, many scientists have once again returned to the belief that life came from nonlife…in spite of the fact that there is no experimental evidence to show how that could have happened. The reason for the return of this unsupported belief is that science has been defined to eliminate the consideration of the only other alternative—the creation of life by an intelligent designer.

Even the simplest living cell is an incredibly complex machine. It must be capable of detecting malfunctions, repairing itself, and reproducing itself. Man has never succeeded in building a machine capable of these same functions. Yet, most scientists accept the belief that life arose from non-life despite the ever increasing amount of evidence clearly indicating that it did not and could never happen. It would be easier to believe that a chemical manufacturing facility found on Mars had built itself.

A classic experiment used to support the belief that life “built itself” was first proposed in 1953 by Stanley Miller. In this experiment, sparks were discharged into an apparatus through which common gases were circulated. These gases reacted to form various organic products which were then collected and analyzed. The experiment succeeded in producing a few of the 20 amino acids required by living cells. These results have been heralded as proof that life could have arisen by itself. However, dozens of major problems with this experiment, (clearly understood for more than 30 years), still go unanswered and are not even mentioned to students.1

For instance, our early atmosphere is assumed to have had no oxygen because this would stop amino acid formation. However, with no oxygen, there would be no ozone shield. With no ozone shield, life would be impossible. The fact that oxidized rocks throughout the geological record indicate that oxygen has always been present is ignored.

In addition, the same gases which can react to form amino acids in the presence of sunlight undergo known reactions which remove them from the atmosphere. The required gases simply could not have been around long enough for life to have developed. Further-more, a cold trap was used to keep the reaction products from being destroyed as fast as they formed. Where is this “cold trap” in nature?

The biggest problem is that the amino acids formed in this experiment are always a 50/50 mixture of stereotypes (L and D forms). Stereotypes are like a drawer full of right-hand and left-hand gloves, identical in every way except a mirror image of each other. Life uses only L stereotypes of these random amino acids. Yet, equal proportions of both types are always produced. How could the first cell have selected only L stereotypes from the random, equally reactive mixture produced in this experiment? And what about the other required types of amino acids which have never been formed in this experiment?

These are just some of the myriad problems regarding the fanciful idea that life generated itself. What this experiment really proves is that life could not possibly have developed in this manner. Yet, students are told just the opposite.

No experiment has ever shown that matter has the ability to come alive. The best explanation for life is still that life only comes from pre-existing life. As you search for the truth, perhaps you should consider the possibility that the source of all life... is God.



1. Thaxton, C.B., Bradley, W.L., Olsen,R.L., The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Chapter 4, Philosophical

Library, 1984.

'We believe that the USA is the major player against Syria and the rest are its instruments'

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 03:31 AM PDT

Robert Fisk, The Independent, 28 August 2012
The battle for Damascus could be heard inside the Foreign Minister’s office yesterday, a vibration of mortars and tank fire from the suburbs of the capital that penetrated Walid Muallem’s inner sanctum, a dangerous heartbeat to match the man’s words.

America was behind Syria’s violence, he said, which will not end even after the battle for Aleppo is over. “I tell the Europeans: ‘I don’t understand your slogan about the welfare of the Syrian people when you are supporting 17 resolutions against the welfare of the Syrian people’. And I tell the Americans: ‘You must read well what you did in Afghanistan and Somalia. I don’t understand your slogan of fighting international terrorism when you are supporting this terrorism in Syria’.”

Walid Muallem spoke in English and very slowly, either because of the disconcerting uproar outside or because this was his first interview with a Western journalist since the Syrian crisis began. At one point, the conflict between rebels and government troops in the suburbs of Douma, Jobar, Arbeen and Qaboun—where a helicopter was shot down—became so loud that even the most phlegmatic of Foreign Ministers in a region plagued by rhetoric glanced towards the window. How did he feel when he heard this, I asked him?

“Before I am a minister, I am a Syrian citizen, and I feel sad at seeing what’s happening in Syria, compared with two years ago,” he said. “There are many Syrians like me—eager to see Syria return to the old days when we were proud of our security.”

I have my doubts about how many Syrians want a return to “the old days” but Muallem claims that perhaps 60 per cent of the country’s violence comes from abroad, from Turkey, from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, with the United States exercising its influence over all others.

“When the Americans say, ‘We are supplying the opposition with sophisticated instruments of telecommunications’, isn’t this part of a military effort, when they supply the opposition with $25m—and much more from the Gulf and Saudi Arabia?”

Of America’s power, Walid Muallem had no doubt. The Americans, he says, succeeded in frightening the Gulf countries about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, persuaded them to buy arms from the US, fulfilling Franklin Roosevelt’s 1936 dream of maintaining bases for oil transportation.

“We believe that the US is the major player against Syria and the rest are its instruments.” But wasn’t this all really about Iran? I asked, a dodgy question since it suggested a secondary role for Syria in its own tragedy. And when Muallem referred to the Brookings Institution, I groaned.

“You are laughing, but sometimes when you are Foreign Minister, you are obliged to read these things—and there was a study by the Brookings Institute [sic] called The Road to Tehran, and the result of this study was: if you want to contain Iran, you must start with Damascus…

“We were told by some Western envoy at the beginning of this crisis that relations between Syria and Iran, Syria and Hezbollah, Syria and Hamas are the major elements behind this crisis. If we settle this issue, they [the Americans] will help end the crisis. But no one told us why it is forbidden for Syria to have relations with Iran when most if not all the Gulf countries have very important relations with Iran.”

For the Syrian Foreign Minister, the crisis started with “legitimate demands” subsequently addressed by “legislation and reforms and even a new constitution”. Then along came “foreign elements” who used these legitimate demands “to hijack the peaceful agenda of the people”.

There followed a familiar tale. “I don’t accept as a citizen to return back centuries to a regime which can bring Syria backwards. In principle …no government in the world can accept an armed terrorist group, some of them coming from abroad, controlling streets and villages in the name of ‘jihad’.”

It was the duty of the Syrian government to “protect” its citizens. Assad represents the unity of Syria and all Syrians must participate in creating a new future for Syria. If Syria falls, its neighbour countries will fall. Muallem travels to the non-aligned summit in Iran tomorrow to burnish what he calls their “constructive efforts” to help Syria.

I asked about chemical weapons, of course. If Syria had such weapons, they would never be used against its own people, he said. “We are fighting armed groups inside Aleppo, in the Damascus suburbs, before that in Homs and Idlib and this means fighting within Syrian cities—and our responsibility is to protect our people.”

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith