Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Friday, June 14, 2013

The Number One Job Skill in 2020

By George Anders, LinkedIn, June 11, 2013

What’s the crucial career strength that employers everywhere are seeking—even though hardly anyone is talking about it? A great way to find out is by studying fast-growing occupations, as compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Sports coaches and fitness trainers. Massage therapists, registered nurses and physical therapists. School psychologists, music tutors, preschool teachers and speech-language pathologists. Personal financial planners, chauffeurs and private detectives. These are among the fields expected to employ at least 20% more people in the U.S. by 2020.

Did you notice the common thread? Every one of these jobs is all about empathy.

In our fast-paced digital world, there’s lots of hand-wringing about the ways that automation and computer technology are taking away the kinds of jobs that kept our parents and grandparents employed. Walk through a modern factory, and you’ll be stunned by how few humans are needed to tend the machines. Similarly, travel agents, video editors and many other white-collar employees have been pushed to the sidelines by the digital revolution’s faster and cheaper methods.

But there’s no substitute for the magic of a face-to-face interaction with someone else who cares. Even the most ingenious machine-based attempts to mimic human conversation can’t match the emotional richness of a real conversation with a real person.

Visit a health club, and you’ll see the best personal trainers don’t just march their clients through a preset run of exercises. They chat about the stresses and rewards of getting back in shape. They tease, they flatter—maybe they even flirt a little. They connect with their clients in a way that builds people’s motivation. Before long, clients keep coming back to the gym because they want to spend time with a friend, and to do something extra to win his or her respect.

It’s the same story in health care or education. Technology can monitor an adult’s glucose levels or a young child’s counting skills quite precisely. Data by itself, though, is just a tool. The real magic happens when a borderline diabetic or a shy preschooler develops enough faith and trust in another person to embark on a new path. What the BLS data tells us is that even in a rapidly automating world, we can’t automate empathy.

Last week, when the BLS reported that the U.S. economy added 175,000 jobs in May, analysts noted that one of the labor market’s bright spots involved restaurants and bars. Waiters, cooks and bartenders accounted for a full 16% of the month’s job growth. As the Washington Post’s Neil Irwin put it, “A robot may be able to assemble a car, but a cook still grills burgers.”

Actually, it’s the people in the front of the restaurant—and behind the bar—that should command our attention. The more time we spend in the efficient but somewhat soulless world of digital connectivity, the more we will cherish a little banter with wait-staff and bartenders who know us by name. We will pay extra to mingle with other people who can keep the timeless art of conversation alive.

Força do Bem—Ética e Integridade Cristã

Peter Amsterdam

Uma das crenças básicas de AFI é que o cristão deveria ser um exemplo vivo do amor de Deus, tanto em palavras como em ações, manifestando as virtudes espirituais mencionadas na Bíblia.[1] Acreditamos que não se deve viver em conformidade com atitudes e valores contrários aos princípios de Deus.[2]

Nossos padrões de ética cristão refletem as crenças e valores fundamentais que abraçamos. Integridade é uma qualidade que implica em possuir e seguir altos princípios e padrões morais, além de honestidade. Ser íntegro significa apoiar e seguir nossas crenças no dia a dia.

Espera-se dos cristãos um alto grau de integridade, e respeita-se aqueles que seguem seus padrões éticos. Depois que as pessoas ficam sabendo que você é cristão, ou missionário, ou voluntário de uma organização cristã, geralmente esperam integridade e honestidade — altos princípios, e que se esforce por mantê-los.

As pessoas para as quais vai ministrar vão querer comprovar se você faz o que diz, ver se você é de confiança. Eu acho que todos nós já percebemos nas nossas interações que as pessoas normalmente esperam um padrão mais alto de integridade dos cristãos do que de outros. Admitimos que somos falhos, vasos fracos que servem de instrumento para o Senhor. No entanto, as pessoas esperam que o cristão seja um exemplo vivo da sua fé, e ficam desapontadas quando não cumprem essa expectativa.

Seguem-se algumas definições interessantes de integridade:



Segundo o dicionário: “Qualidade do que é inteiro, completo.” Quando sou íntegro, minha conduta reflete minhas palavras. Sou a mesma pessoa não importa onde esteja ou com quem esteja.

Integridade está mais relacionada ao que somos e não tanto ao que fazemos, pois quem somos determina o que fazemos. O nosso sistema de valores é intrínseco, não nos pode ser tirado, e se torna o nosso norte.[3]



Integridade determina o que não faremos, o que deixaremos de fazer e o que defenderemos a todo custo… A integridade é a base do que somos. Perdê-la significa perder uma parte essencial da nossa identidade.[4]



Integridade significa “estado de uma coisa que tem todas as suas partes”. Demonstra firme compromisso com nossos valores, os quais prezamos, nos são mais importantes, e moldam nossas vidas. Viver com base nisso é integridade.

Agir de acordo com suas convicções e o que considera importante lhe dá bem estar interior e paz de espírito… mesmo sendo difícil fazer isso, mas sente que é o certo. Já quando o seu comportamento conflita com seus valores a sensação é inversa.[5]



Integridade também é uma questão de convicção pessoal, e cada um deve determinar quais valores lhe são importantes e o que acha que deve seguir. Cada um de nós é responsável diante do Senhor por agir com integridade e atender aos nossos princípios e valores. A integridade moral dará credibilidade ao nosso testemunho, exemplo pessoal, e às nossas obras. Uma tradução moderna da Bíblia define esse conceito da seguinte forma: “E nisto você mesmo deve ser para eles um exemplo nas boas obras de toda espécie. Que tudo o que você fizer revele o seu amor pela verdade e o fato de que é absolutamente sincero nisso.”[6]

Em outras palavras, o exemplo comprovará as crenças que ensinamos, pois o que as pessoas veem e a sua impressão de nós influencia a sua resposta à nossa mensagem. Como disse o autor cristão John Maxwell, “Se eu fizer o que digo, terei resultados consistentes.” Essa é a nossa meta. Queremos que os resultados sejam condizentes com nossa fé e valores, vidas mudadas, pessoas transformadas que conhecerão a Cristo

Agir com integridade é essencial para conquistar credibilidade, tanto na vida pessoal como na obra missionária. Credibilidade significa conquistar o respeito de outros nos círculos que frequentamos, e uma maneira importante de alcançar esse objetivo é agindo com profissionalismo e integridade, mostrando que somos de confiança, que podem contar conosco e que operamos de maneira honesta, transparente, confiável e profissional. Como disse John Maxwell: “Quanto mais confiável você for, mais as pessoas acreditarão em você, o que lhe dará o privilégio de influenciar suas vidas. Quanto menos credibilidade, menos confiança as pessoas depositarão em você, e mais rapidamente perderá a sua posição de influência.”[7]

Hoje em dia as notícias correm rápido. É importante nos esforçarmos o máximo possível por garantir que essas notícias contribuirão para dar credibilidade e promover simpatia por nós.



Atualmente todos os sistemas são interligados e cada elemento afeta o outro. Somos um mosaico das nossas decisões diárias, pensamentos e ações, de grande ou de pequena envergadura. Como disse o escritor de negócios John Ellis, “A verdade pesa. A lealdade pesa. A mentira pesa. …não existe nada oculto, principalmente no mundo atual e conectado onde as notícias, particularmente as más notícias, são veiculadas em questão de segundos.”[8]



Ser honesto diante dos homens é uma pedra fundamental da integridade e do cumprimento dos nossos deveres cívicos ou sociais.[9] Em uma passagem bem conhecida no Evangelho de São Marcos, Jesus estabelece o padrão quanto aos deveres cívicos.



E, chegando eles, disseram-Lhe: “Mestre, sabemos que és homem de verdade e não Te importas com quem quer que seja, porque não olhas a aparência dos homens, antes, com verdade, ensinas o caminho de Deus. É lícito pagar tributo a César ou não? Pagaremos ou não pagaremos?” …

“Trazei-Me uma moeda, para que a veja.” E eles lha trouxeram. E disse-lhes: De quem é esta imagem e inscrição? E eles Lhe disseram: De César. E Jesus, respondendo, disse-lhes: Dai, pois, a César o que é de César e a Deus, o que é de Deus. E maravilharam-se dEle.”[10]



Também é bom consultar pessoas que entendem da situação para terem certeza que suas atividades estão amparadas na lei e o trabalho é edificado sobre um firme alicerce. No caso de uma associação, possivelmente precisará da assessoria de um advogado para garantir que age de acordo com os padrões éticos. Se estiver iniciando um negócio é aconselhável consultar um profissional para evitar erros que poderão custar bastante no futuro. Se estiver montando um maternal ou uma pré-escola, deve se certificar de ter os seguros exigidos e cumprir todas as exigências da lei para esse tipo de estabelecimento.

Cada um de nós é responsável por cumprir nossas obrigações e deveres cívicos, quer como membros de diretoria em uma entidade registrada (com ou sem fins lucrativos), quer como supervisores de um trabalho missionário ou parceiros em um projeto social ou empresa. Para a FI, que é uma organização com base na fé, integridade nos negócios e “honestidade diante dos homens” são valores importantes intrínsecos em uma vida temente a Deus e para os que seguem os ensinamentos de Jesus.

Amar a Deus e ao nosso próximo é a essência dos nossos princípios-guia e valores, a base da integridade como cristãos.



Jesus estabeleceu dois valores concisos e profundos para guiar nossas vidas: Amar a Deus e ao nosso próximo. Isso serve de alicerce para tudo o que formos edificar e de padrão para avaliarmos nossas decisões e ações.

Se amarmos a Deus de todo o coração, alma e entendimento, faremos o melhor possível por permanecer próximos dEle, tomando tempo na Sua presença e seguindo a Sua Palavra.

Se amarmos as pessoas e as tratarmos como gostariam de ser tratadas, se formos dutos do amor incondicional de Deus pelos outros, teremos consideração e respeito pelas pessoas; agiremos com integridade, pensando no que precisam e nos dispondo a dedicar tempo e/ou compartilhar nossas posses para suprir suas necessidades; demonstraremos o amor de Deus e ofereceremos a salvação a todos com quem temos contato.

Esses valores estabelecidos por Jesus são firmes, constantes e permanentes. Podemos usá-los como padrão de julgamento para qualquer circunstância e decisão, e neles basear nossas respostas, escolhas e ações. Nós, como seguidores de Jesus, individual e coletivamente na nossa organização, devemos ter esses dois valores como luz guia.[11]



Publicado originalmente em janeiro de 2011. Editado e republicado em junho de 2013. Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli e Denise Oliveira. Revisão Hebe Rondon Flandoli


[1] Ver Gálatas 5:22–23.

[2] Declaração de Fé de A Família Internacional: “Viver uma Vida Temente a Deus.”

[3] John Maxwell, Developing the Leader Within You (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2000).

[4] Lawrence M. Hinman, Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade de San Diego.

[5] Rhoberta Shaler, Ph.D.

[6] Tito 2:7 NLT.

[7] John Maxwell, Developing the Leader Within You (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2000).

[8] Steven R. Van Hook, Ph.D., “Ethical Public Relations—Not an Oxymoron.”

[9] Romanos 12:17.

[10] Marcos 12:14–17 NVI.

[11] Peter Amsterdam, "Planos para o Futuro," publicado originalmente em junho de 2010.

A New Song

By Robin Whaley

Download Audio (8.7MB)

“A lady named Anna was one of the thousands of people buried in the Haiti earthquake. Rescuers digging through the rubble found her after a week, not only alive, but singing. One of the rescuers commented, ‘It wasn’t the best singing we’d ever heard, but it was so passionate. Anna was just pleased to be saved!’”

This inspirational talk on being sincere and passionate in our praises is based on Exodus chapter 15. We’ve been rescued for eternity through God’s love in Jesus; that’s a reason to sing and praise. The speaker is Robin Whaley at Eden Baptist Church, Cambridge. Run time is 19 minutes.

Maturity, Growth, and Progress-for woman

By Jesus, speaking in prophecy
A message for women

Download Audio (5.6MB)

Let this time of midlife mark another point in your womanhood, another medal pinned on you, another token of a job well done. Even if it comes through tests and trials, through emotions, feelings and sensations which are not easily perceived or understood. Think of the many changes that come in the same manner, and while new and different experiences sometimes catch you off guard, they have the potential to become precious learning experiences.

This can be a time to enrich your soul and to prove once again your womanhood, your maturity. This is a great and glorious thing to Me, and I do not want it to be a tedious or a worrisome thing for you. It should be one more badge of courage, honor, and glory in your womanhood.

I look upon this time of trial, testing, change and new sensations as a time of maturity, growth, and progress. It is not something that I wish for you to worry about or fear. When you feel sensations that you are unsure of, look to Me and seek Me, and I will speak to your heart and explain these things to you and give you knowledge and understanding.

I will not leave you comfortless, but I will come to you. In the hour that you need it, I will come to you. I will comfort you and surround you with songs of deliverance.

*

I will replace your worry with joy. I will replace your discomfort with the comforting hand of My touch on you, with My love in your heart. I will comfort you and speak gentle words of love and encouragement that would engender trust and faith and the feeling of peace, even in the midst of trouble or change or whatever you do not understand.

I am with you in these changes, to bring you through to victory, joy, and usefulness. For you are planted in the house of the Lord and you will flourish in the courts of your God. You will still bring forth fruit in your old age; you will be rich and flourishing. When you wake in the night, I will speak words of comfort, words of cheer, words of encouragement to you.

I love you. I adore you, and I will care for you.

*

To you who have given your all, who have forsaken your life, who have given yourself to Me: Would I forsake you in your time of need? Am I a God afar off who does not hear?

No, I am your Husband, betrothed to you. And when you walk through the waters, I will be with you. When you pass through the fires, I will hold your hand, saying, “Fear not; I am with you.” As I was with Meshach, Shadrach, and Abednego in the fiery furnace, so will I be with you. We will walk through this together, you and I.

Remember that fear is one of the main devices of the Enemy of your soul. So when you are tempted to fear, or dread, or worry, please just ask Me about it. Rather than letting the fear take over, simply ask Me about this fear, give it to Me, put it in My hands. I am with you. I am as real as you are, and I am closer than your next breath.

I will not forsake you in your time of trouble, as you have not forsaken Me all these years. I am able to carry you through this. This will be a time of you drawing closer to Me.

I look forward to this time of communion and fellowship with you in the night seasons, when we are alone together, when everyone else is asleep and I have your attention. I am giving you this time to pour out your soul to Me, to pour out your deepest thoughts to Me, so that I may show you that I really am, that I am with you. I do exist inside of your soul, inside of your heart. I am waiting for you to come to Me, so I may walk with you.

Now is the time of the changing of the seasons, the time when you grow rich and golden and silver. These things are badges on your shoulders and ribbons draping down your arms. This time is an honor to you, and it is a time of graduation, a time of maturity.

I do honor you, and I will now be with you through this new venture. As I have been with you through the pioneering of many ministries and works in My service, I will be with you through the pioneering of this new stage, this new season in your life. I will make it a blessing to you.

I will pour down My grace and mercy and power upon you, as I show you how to walk through this new stage and how to become the woman that I have planned for you to be. For this is not the end; this is the beginning of a new stage, of a new era in your life. The lessons and maturity and wisdom that you gain are now another building block in your spiritual life. This is the beginning of the rest of your life.

Look to Me; hang on to Me. Put your arms around Me as we walk together into this new era, as I show you new horizons, and as I lift you up higher to see further over the horizon for what comes next.

Originally published 1996. Updated and republished June 2013.
Read by Bryan Clark.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Club of rich, powerful meet in secret near London

By Jill Lawless, AP, Jun 7, 2013:

LONDON (AP)—It’s a busy weekend at the luxury Grove Hotel, favored haunt of British soccer players and their glitz-loving spouses.

More than 100 of the world’s most powerful people are at the former manor house near London for a secretive annual gathering that has attained legendary status in the eyes of anti-capitalist protesters and conspiracy theorists.

The guest list for the Bilderberg meeting includes Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde and former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. British Prime Minister David Cameron is due to drop by Friday.

The Bilderberg Group was set up in 1954 to support military and economic co-operation between Europe and North America during the Cold War.

Named for the site of its first meeting—the Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Holland—the forum for prominent politicians, thinkers and business leaders has been held annually at a series of secluded venues in Europe and North America.

What happens at Bilderberg, stays at Bilderberg. There is no media access and the public is kept away by a large security operation. The group says that “there is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.”

But in a move toward slightly more openness, the group now has a website, which lists attendees and key topics for discussion, including the economy, U.S. foreign policy, “cyber warfare and the proliferation of asymmetric threats” and “major trends in medical research.”

Invitees include British Treasury chief George Osborne, Goldman Sachs chairman Peter Sutherland and Thomas Enders, CEO of aerospace company EADS.

Publication of these details has done little to ease the concerns of protesters, who sense a shadowy global elite at work in the secretive meeting.

“When 130 of the leaders from all across the West get together, and many of these are billionaires, they are people who are immensely wealthy and immensely powerful,” said Michael Meacher, a lawmaker from Britain’s Labour Party.

“And when they all get together, it’s not just to have a chat about the latest problem, it is to concert plans for the future of capitalism in the West. That is on a very different scale.”

Others go even further, putting Bilderberg at the heart of a global web of conspiracy. The protesters in Watford include U.S. talk-radio host and Sept. 11 “truther” Alex Jones, and former professional soccer player David Icke, who believes the world is run by a race of reptiles in human form.

Demonstrators plan to hold a “Bilderberg fringe” festival outside the hotel until the conference ends Sunday.

A Bilderberg spokesman—reached by email since no phone number is listed—said there is nothing sinister about the gathering.

“We disclose the date, the location, the participants and the key topics of the conference,” Xander Heijnen said. “Many groups of people meet without announcing it publicly at all, without disclosing who is taking part and without giving any key topics.

“The meetings broaden the participants’ range of viewpoints, help them to gain insights and exchange views,” he said. “It seems illogical to argue that a meeting of individuals designed to give and obtain fresh insights, somehow ‘undermines democracy.’”

That message has not swayed protesters like Judd Charlton, a ventriloquist from London who showed up Thursday to jeer at cars with blacked-out windows entering the hotel compound.

“We are basically here to bring down the parasites who are drug dealers and bank collapsers who seem to want to destroy this world,” he said.

More Breast-Feeding Could Save Billions and Prevent Thousands of Breast Cancer Cases

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 09:00 AM PDT
By Bonnie Rochman, TIME, June 07, 2013
Thanks to public health messages, everyone pretty much knows that breast-feeding is beneficial for baby. But it’s also really good for mom, and now a new study quantifies just how good.
If new moms adhered to the recommended guidelines that urge them to breast-feed each child they give birth to for at least one year, they could theoretically stave off up to 5,000 cases of breast cancer, about 54,000 cases of hypertension and nearly 14,000 heart attacks annually.
Averting those diseases could also save $860 million, according to research published in Obstetrics & Gynecology.
Those figures, while significant and intriguing, are not actual numbers from documented cases. Rather, they’re the result of a sophisticated statistical model used to compare the effect of current breast-feeding rates in the U.S. to ideal rates.
The study, led by Harvard researcher Dr. Melissa Bartick, simulated the experiences of about 2 million U.S. women from the time they were 15 until they turned 70, estimating outcomes and cumulative costs over the decades in between.
The conclusions, says Dr. Kathleen Marinelli, a neonatologist and chair-elect of the U.S. Breastfeeding Committee, represent a “very elegant mathematical and statistical look at the health costs to women and society of not breast-feeding optimally in the U.S.”
“What’s important is that it tells us that the cost of not providing support to women to optimally breast-feed their babies is astronomical because of the known health benefits to women. This points out that breast-feeding is not a lifestyle choice; it’s a public health imperative.”






By Bonnie Rochman, TIME, June 07, 2013

Thanks to public health messages, everyone pretty much knows that breast-feeding is beneficial for baby. But it’s also really good for mom, and now a new study quantifies just how good.

If new moms adhered to the recommended guidelines that urge them to breast-feed each child they give birth to for at least one year, they could theoretically stave off up to 5,000 cases of breast cancer, about 54,000 cases of hypertension and nearly 14,000 heart attacks annually.

Averting those diseases could also save $860 million, according to research published in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Those figures, while significant and intriguing, are not actual numbers from documented cases. Rather, they’re the result of a sophisticated statistical model used to compare the effect of current breast-feeding rates in the U.S. to ideal rates.

The study, led by Harvard researcher Dr. Melissa Bartick, simulated the experiences of about 2 million U.S. women from the time they were 15 until they turned 70, estimating outcomes and cumulative costs over the decades in between.

The conclusions, says Dr. Kathleen Marinelli, a neonatologist and chair-elect of the U.S. Breastfeeding Committee, represent a “very elegant mathematical and statistical look at the health costs to women and society of not breast-feeding optimally in the U.S.”

“What’s important is that it tells us that the cost of not providing support to women to optimally breast-feed their babies is astronomical because of the known health benefits to women. This points out that breast-feeding is not a lifestyle choice; it’s a public health imperative.”

Preach The Gospel At All Times And When Necessary Use Words


by Adele Richards on Jan 23rd, 2012
http://revivalmag.com/article/preach-gospel-all-times-and-when-necessary-use-words

What power do words really hold? According to statistics 55% of communication is non-verbal, 38% is in the tone and only 7% is communicated by the actual words. Which makes me wonder whether instead of studying theology, most preachers would do better to study mime. “Roll up! Roll up! Come to Bible School and learn how to walk up and down invisible steps, get trapped in an invisible cube and pull on an invisible rope. You’ll love it!”


No-one likes to be on the receiving end of a sales pitch.

The quote “Preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words” is attributed to Francis of Assisi, a monk who lived at the end of the 12th century. Makes you wonder which famous quotes of our century will stand the test of time. Maybe “I’ll be back!” or “Eat my shorts!”. Or then again…

Clearly there is something about Francis’s comment that resonates through the centuries. Perhaps it is because most people do not like to be preached at. Ironic then that the focus of most church services is ‘the preach’. Most of the sermons you hear are wonderful, I’m sure. It is that didactic ‘preachy’ preach that tells you how you should live and why you are getting it all wrong, that grates. Although I’m not sure if we in the church even notice this any more because we are so used to being ‘preached at’. It is mother’s milk to us.

The more you hang out with those outside the church, the more you see the wariness in their eyes when they sense a ‘preach’ heading their way. You know, that look they get when you say you are a Christian? You can see the defences go up as they prepare themselves for the sales pitch. And they can smell a sales pitch from ten miles away.

Let’s be honest. No-one likes to be on the receiving end of a sales pitch. Whether it’s someone on the phone trying to sell you life insurance, or a second hand car dealer announcing the deal of the century. You can tell when they are only interested in making a sale. You can tell when they don’t care one jot about you. It stinks.

But the Mac Genius at the Mac Bar, who clearly knows his stuff and is happy to lend you his expertise for a few minutes for free. Now that is attractive. Because he loves it, because he wants to help you, and because we are at some level aware of our need for help from an expert. If they aren’t obnoxious, we will listen.

So, I am quite comfortable with Francis’s idea that we can preach the gospel without getting all preachy. But what does Jesus have to say about all this? Jesus quotes Isaiah 61:1, “The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has anointed me to preach good news to the poor.” The word used for preach in the original Hebrew is ‘piel’ which means:
1) to gladden with good news
2) to bear news
3) to announce (salvation) as good news, preach

That second definition intrigues me. It makes the word ‘preach’, that I often think of as just words, seem like something more tangible. When you bear a child, or you bring a parcel, it’s not just words; there is something to see. And it’s pretty darn exciting.


My plan is to be stupidly in love.

And if you have really good news to share with someone – they can tell before you even open your mouth. It is physically difficult to hold the news in! Your body gives you away. Your eyes are shining! You burst into the room with a whoop! in your step. You bring the good news into the room with you. You can feel good news before it even takes word form. It’s contagious. Who wouldn’t want to know what you’re looking so flipping excited about? Apparently it even makes your feet look nice: “As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!" (Romans 10:15).

I have a confession. I’m pretty sure that I don’t often bring this kind of pizzazz into a room. Sometimes pizza, yes, but not good-news-bursting-out pizzazz. But I have a vision for one day, bringing the pizzazz. I have a dream of having more beautiful feet – and it’s not achieved by pedicures. My plan is to be stupidly in love. People who are in love are noticeably radiant. They are full of the joys of Spring, they love everyone and everything because life is good, because they are IN LURVE. Yes, that’s going to be me; shiny-eyed and glossy-coated. I love him, yes. We’re dating at the moment. But one day I’m going to fall for the Bridegroom big time and then, watch out! I shall be a woman in love.


They hung on every word he said.

When Jesus walked into a room he brought the pizzazz. I mean, he BROUGHT it, he DELIVERED it. BOOM. Something amazing was there, in the look in his eye. He only had to invite the disciples to follow him and they left their livelihoods in an instant. Children flocked to him. But Jesus did also use words. He taught and preached and he did tell people, didactically, what to do and not do. But he also told stories. Lots of stories. That most people did not understand. Even the disciples had to ask him what on earth the parable of the sower meant. And yet thousands of people still followed him up mountains, without a picnic lunch. They hung on every word he said, even when it made no sense to their brains at all. Why?

I once heard James Jordan of Fatherheart Ministries explain that when we are listening to an anointed preacher what we are really doing is drinking from their spirit. James is an amazing, anointed preacher himself; his teaching is theologically mind-blowing but that is not the best part. I have listened to him preach all day, day after day. I heard the same words many times over but it was always fresh because he spoke from his spirit; he released his spirit, and that brought the sweetest presence of Father into the room. He delivered.

This is why note-taking during sermons seems a little beside the point. If what the preacher is saying hasn’t gone into your spirit, if you haven’t encountered God as she speaks, and been changed by it, then a notebook full of references is of little lasting use to you.


Your friends who don't know God, know you.

True preaching isn’t about imparting information into someone’s mind. After all “knowledge puffs up, but love builds up”. True preaching is about imparting Love Himself. We encounter him, when the preacher knows how to speak from their heart or spirit. As Jesus says in Matthew 12:34, “out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks”. This connection between heart and mouth is vital:

For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. (Romans 10:10)

so that with one heart and mouth you may glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. (Romans 15:6)

If our words don’t tally with what is in our hearts they are empty and devoid of power. It is only when they connect with our hearts that they bring the power to change someone else. When preaching with words to those outside the church if the motive in our hearts is manipulative, the listener can hear that. They can see it in the coolness of our eye and they can smell it from a mile off. It stinks.

Words are powerful, but hearts more so. Your friends who don’t know God, know you. They read you. They read your life. They look to see whether you really love them or whether they are just your evangelism project. So if we want to be amazing preachers our hearts need to keep being filled with Love Himself. He smells amazing. So let’s love him, and love others, and fall even more madly in love because that’s a good sermon right there. Oh, and you can use words too. If necessary.

Syrian Teenager's Public Death Reveals Growing Anger as Civil War Continues

By Kareem Fahim and Hania Mourtada, NY Times, June 10, 2013

BEIRUT, Lebanon—The teenager’s name was Muhammad al-Qatta, and he was 14 years old when witnesses said radical Islamists in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo pulled him from his coffee kiosk on Sunday and later executed him in a public square.

Muhammad had left his house to close up his kiosk, where his work supported his family, his mother said. When someone approached him looking for a free cup of coffee, the teenager uttered the phrase that cast him among the victims of the war’s growing depravity.

“He was talking to this guy and told him, ‘I don’t want to lend you anything,’ ” the teenager’s father quoted him as saying.

“If Muhammad, peace be upon him, were to come to this earth right now, I would still not lend a cup of coffee to anyone unless they pay for it,” the teenager said.

Three men with long hair, wearing long beards and the robes favored by ultraconservatives, overheard the exchange. They accused the teenager of insulting the prophet, told him to leave the kiosk and then took him away in the car. When they returned an hour later, Muhammad bore the marks of a beating. In a square, they covered his head with his shirt, a makeshift blindfold, as if he were “some big shot,” his mother said.

She watched from her balcony, as hundreds of people gathered around. A resident of the neighborhood, Abu Abdo, heard what the men said. Addressing the “respected people of Aleppo,” they warned that cursing God or the Prophet Muhammad was a sin, saying it would be “punished this way.”

The teenager’s father heard the shots. His wife told him that the men had killed their son.

“His blood ran in front of me,” Muhammad’s mother, said in a grim video posted on the Internet on Monday. In her anguish, she invoked the name of another teenage victim in Syria, Hamza Ali al-Khateeb, whose death at the hands of government forces helped propel the uprising, now a war in its third year. He was pulled aside two years ago by government agents at a protest, brutalized and killed before being sent back to his family.

Just as Hamza’s death crystallized the rage against President Bashar al-Assad, Muhammad’s killing stoked similar feelings against a new power that has emerged during the war. It focused anger on hard-line Islamists, including foreigners, some of whom have seized on the conflict in Syria as an opportunity to impose their mores. For Muhammad’s mother and some her neighbors, the tyrannies were indistinguishable, trapping many Syrians in a vise.

In a home in Muhammad’s neighborhood, Mr. Abu Abdo said what had happened to the two boys was “the same.”

“Who kills a teen, whatever the reason is, is a killer,” he said, adding that Syrians were looking for life without the government’s security thugs “or radical Sunnis who raise black flags, and want to build a state not fit for our minds.”

There is growing anger at the small but assertive cadre of extremists who have joined the rebel ranks, and whose hard-line beliefs have unsettled even pious Syrians. Their influence is being felt in mosques, in schools and in committees and courts intended to enforce a strict version of Islamic law. Disgust with the radicals has peaked in recent months after reports of summary executions, including of government soldiers and men accused of crimes and then punished.

Israeli policy pivot strengthens grasp on East Jerusalem

By Benjamin Lynfield, CS Monitor, June 10, 2013

Jerusalem—Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat recently advised the city’s Arab residents to forget about ever having a capital in the predominantly Palestinian eastern part of the city.

In an interview last month, Mr. Barkat told the Times of Israel that if the Palestinians really want a capital in East Jerusalem, they can simply rename Ramallah, the de-facto capital of the West Bank about 10 miles to its north, “Jerusalem” or “north Jerusalem.”

“There is no such thing” as a Palestinian sovereign role in Jerusalem, he added.

The mayor’s rhetoric starkly highlights recent Israeli government actions that observers say are aimed at weakening the Palestinian presence in East Jerusalem and making the possibility of establishing a Palestinian capital there more remote.

Last week the government threw its weight behind a controversial property law that could enable the state to seize up to 40 percent of the Palestinian private property in Jerusalem. And in recent weeks, authorities have revived a policy of demolishing Palestinian homes built without permits, ending an unofficial moratorium on home demolitions in response to US criticism. Palestinians argue that restrictive planning policies make it virtually impossible to get the required permits.

Israeli organization Ir Amim (City of Nations), which calls for equality in the city, says that 12 buildings housing a total of 105 Palestinians have been destroyed since April 15.

“It’s all connected. It’s part of an overall policy of losing restraints and using more power to enforce themselves in East Jerusalem, to give the message ‘we are here and will make our presence felt with full impact,’” says Yehudit Oppenheimer, director of Ir Amim. “The idea is to consolidate Israeli control without any consideration of the Palestinians who live there.”

Abdullah Abdullah, a Ramallah-based member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, terms the moves “very dangerous.” About the property law, which was initially used by Israel to seize property left behind by Palestinians who fled or were expelled during the 1948 war, Mr. Abdullah says, “The least we can say is that this is theft, but it also changes the identity of Jerusalem.”

Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor dismissed Abdullah’s remark as “Palestinian propaganda.”

These developments do not bode well for US Secretary of State John Kerry’s efforts to prod the sides to a revival of peace talks on a two-state solution. His public remarks have not broached the city’s future status.

The government’s shift on Palestinian property in Jerusalem became apparent last week, after Israeli Supreme Court justices hearing appeals against property seizures demanded that Israeli Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein give his opinion.

“The legal position is indeed that properties in East Jerusalem whose owners are residents of Judea and Samaria are absentee properties,” Mr. Weinstein wrote the court, using Israel’s names for the West Bank.

This means that West Bank Palestinian residents can lose their property in East Jerusalem because they are designated “absentees”—even though they never sold their property and it was Israel that had expanded its borders to include their land in the 1967 annexation of East Jerusalem rejected as illegal by the international community.

Weinstein’s statement reverses a 2005 position by then attorney general Menachem Mazuz, who ruled that the absentee property law should not be applied in East Jerusalem because this was not its original intent and it could harm Israel’s international standing.

But Danny Seidemann, a lawyer who is head of Terrestrial Jerusalem, a research institute that promotes conflict resolution for the city, says shifting away from Mazuz’s stance could make up to 40 percent of the private Palestinian property in East Jerusalem subject to seizure by the Israeli government.

“The primary victims of this are all Palestinians in East Jerusalem,” he says.

Seidemann, who is widely considered to be the top independent Israeli specialist on East Jerusalem, noted that the state is simultaneously backing the eviction of Palestinians from East Jerusalem properties owned by Jews prior to Israel’s establishment in 1948.

“The state’s position is that any land in Jerusalem that belonged to Jews prior to 1948 and was lost as a result of war will revert to previous Jewish owners while any property that can be purported to be abandoned by Palestinians will also revert to Israelis,” Seidemann said. “That is not a level playing field and the comfort zone between these policies and apartheid is narrowing dangerously.”

Edward Snowden: saving us from the United Stasi of America

Daniel Ellsberg, The Guardian, 10 June 2013

In my estimation, there has not been in American history a more important leak than Edward Snowden’s release of NSA material—and that definitely includes the Pentagon Papers 40 years ago. Snowden’s whistleblowing gives us the possibility to roll back a key part of what has amounted to an “executive coup” against the US constitution.

Since 9/11, there has been, at first secretly but increasingly openly, a revocation of the bill of rights for which this country fought over 200 years ago. In particular, the fourth and fifth amendments of the US constitution, which safeguard citizens from unwarranted intrusion by the government into their private lives, have been virtually suspended.

The government claims it has a court warrant under Fisa—but that unconstitutionally sweeping warrant is from a secret court, shielded from effective oversight, almost totally deferential to executive requests. As Russell Tice, a former National Security Agency analyst, put it: “It is a kangaroo court with a rubber stamp.”

For the president then to say that there is judicial oversight is nonsense—as is the alleged oversight function of the intelligence committees in Congress. Not for the first time—as with issues of torture, kidnapping, detention, assassination by drones and death squads—they have shown themselves to be thoroughly co-opted by the agencies they supposedly monitor. They are also black holes for information that the public needs to know.

The fact that congressional leaders were “briefed” on this and went along with it, without any open debate, hearings, staff analysis, or any real chance for effective dissent, only shows how broken the system of checks and balances is in this country.

Obviously, the United States is not now a police state. But given the extent of this invasion of people’s privacy, we do have the full electronic and legislative infrastructure of such a state. If, for instance, there was now a war that led to a large-scale anti-war movement—like the one we had against the war in Vietnam—or, more likely, if we suffered one more attack on the scale of 9/11, I fear for our democracy. These powers are extremely dangerous.

There are legitimate reasons for secrecy, and specifically for secrecy about communications intelligence. That’s why Bradley Mannning and I—both of whom had access to such intelligence with clearances higher than top-secret—chose not to disclose any information with that classification. And it is why Edward Snowden has committed himself to withhold publication of most of what he might have revealed.

But what is not legitimate is to use a secrecy system to hide programs that are blatantly unconstitutional in their breadth and potential abuse. Neither the president nor Congress as a whole may by themselves revoke the fourth amendment—and that’s why what Snowden has revealed so far was secret from the American people.

In 1975, Senator Frank Church spoke of the National Security Agency in these terms:

“I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.”

The dangerous prospect of which he warned was that America’s intelligence gathering capability—which is today beyond any comparison with what existed in his pre-digital era—“at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left.”

That has now happened. That is what Snowden has exposed, with official, secret documents. The NSA, FBI and CIA have, with the new digital technology, surveillance powers over our own citizens that the Stasi—the secret police in the former “democratic republic” of East Germany—could scarcely have dreamed of. Snowden reveals that the so-called intelligence community has become the United Stasi of America.

So we have fallen into Senator Church’s abyss. The questions now are whether he was right or wrong that there is no return from it, and whether that means that effective democracy will become impossible.

Snowden did what he did because he recognised the NSA’s surveillance programs for what they are: dangerous, unconstitutional activity. This wholesale invasion of Americans’ and foreign citizens’ privacy does not contribute to our security; it puts in danger the very liberties we’re trying to protect.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith