Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

The Worth of a Witness!—Part 6 By M. Fountaine


Link

Isaac McCoy

Born: June 13, 1784, Fayette County, Pennsylvania.



Died: June 21, 1846, Louisville, Kentucky, at age 62.

McCoy was a missionary to the Indians. He moved to Kentucky at the age of six with his family. The McCoy family rafted down the Ohio River to Kentucky, settling first near Louisville, and in 1792 in Shelby County. Isaac’s mother was a Native American. His father was a Baptist minister, and though Isaac and his father had profound arguments on religion due to the elder McCoy’s opposition to missionizing, Isaac still set his eyes on becoming a missionary. In 1804 at the age of 20, Isaac McCoy married Christiana Polke, age 16. They had 14 children.

Isaac rode hundreds of miles through the wilderness and swam the swollen streams, often sleeping on the wet ground at night, for the sake of his missions, which he carried on for 29 years. One of the severest trials that Mr. McCoy was called to bear was the sickness and sometimes death that would visit his family during his absences from home. Five of his children died at different times while he was away.

From 1822 to 1832 he and his family ran a mission to the Indians, called the Carey Mission, in Niles, Michigan, named after William Carey, the English missionary to India. Two of the biggest problems, besides culture shock, that the Indians faced due to mingling with the settlers were alcoholism and exploitation. McCoy’s solution was to move the Indians beyond where they could be corrupted and exploited by the white people. But the tide of westward expansion in the U.S. was too strong, and his plans failed. Still, the vision of this preacher and pioneer was amazing to many. He worked as a surveyor, teacher, and government commissioner, besides running the school and preaching in the church.

He made ten trips on horseback to Washington D.C. to stir interest in Congress to implement measures beneficial to the Indians. In 1842, he organized the American Indian Mission Association. McCoy is remembered as a pioneer in Indian evangelistic efforts outside of the Northeast.

His wife, Christiana McCoy, also dedicated her life to working in the wilderness of Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, and Indian Territory, aiding her husband in his work of feeding, clothing, and teaching the Indians and their children about Jesus. She possessed the same spirit of love and determination as her husband, and zealously labored on behalf of the Indians until her death at age 73.

(Jesus:) “If you believe you are called by Me to a certain area, as McCoy was called to reach the Indians in his homeland, have courage to take the first step toward that calling. I’ll meet you in that first step with the anointing and blessings you need for the following steps. Some people know what their calling is, but are afraid to move forward. Don’t be afraid. Even if things don’t work out exactly as you expect, you’ll still not lose because you will have the blessings of fulfillment, of being a help to others, and of doing what you felt called to do for Me. Your calling doesn’t have to work out perfectly; it just has to have a beginning, a middle, and eventually a ‘well done’ from Me.”

For more information see:

http://baptisthistoryhomepage.com/mccoy.isaac.indian.miss.html

https://www.kshs.org/p/isaac-mccoy-papers/14076

http://biography.yourdictionary.com/isaac-mccoy

http://www.kansasmemory.org/item/497

http://bit.ly/1mCHwpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_McCoy

Helen Steiner Rice

Born: May 19, 1900, Lorain, Ohio.

Died: April 23, 1981, Wyoming, Ohio, at age 81.



“A man’s gift maketh room for him, and bringeth him before great men” (Proverbs 18:16 KJV).

Helen was a talented woman with an exceptional ability to write short inspirational and religious poems. As a child she loved to write rhyming couplets and to preach about God’s love to her family. Her life was tempered by bouts of depression, physical pain, and sorrow. Her father, a railroad worker, died suddenly in the worldwide Spanish Influenza epidemic of 1918, which ended any aspirations she may have had of attending college.

While working at the Lorain Electric Light and Power Company, she learned to decorate lampshades and taught other women how to do this. She was soon promoted to advertising manager, promoting the power company with both her poems and knack for window decorating. This is when she began her public speaking career, and by the age of 25 she was a nationally known speaker. In 1927 she founded her own speaker’s bureau. In June of 1928, Helen spoke at a bankers’ convention in Dayton, Ohio. Mr. Franklin Rice was assigned to escort Helen, and the following January they were married. Everything in life looked hopeful and promising.

Franklin invested most of their wealth in the stock market, but when it began to fluctuate, Helen wanted Franklin to stop buying securities. Franklin thought it was only a temporary fluctuation. In October of 1929, the market crashed, bringing on the Great Depression. Within only a few months, all their money was gone. Instead, they had countless bills. Franklin lost his job at the bank, leading to his tragic suicide a short time later. He and Helen had been married almost three years.

In 1931, she joined Gibson Greeting Cards in Cincinnati, where she worked for the next 40 years. Whatever the occasion, there was a verse from her heart and pen. Although she was a deeply religious woman, her religious greeting card poems were relatively few because of company restrictions. So in the evenings at home, she began to write inspirational verses to friends and co-workers and to enclose them in personal notes and letters. These reflected her growing and deepening faith in God.

When the greeting card editor at Gibson died suddenly in the mid-1930s, Helen took over the job. With her flourishing success, she began to have an ever-widening influence. Her fame skyrocketed when she wrote “The Priceless Gift of Christmas,” which was read on The Lawrence Welk Show in 1960.

Later she wrote poems like “A Child’s Faith,” “When I Must Leave You,” and “The End of the Road Is but a Bend in the Road.” In the years that followed, Helen was approached to write books of inspirational verses. She compiled many of the rhymed stanzas originally sent to those she loved as well as many new inspirational verses into books. This was done in addition to her full-time work producing greeting cards for Gibson. At the time of her mother’s death in the mid-1940s, she penned a condolence verse.

Her simple, sincere expressions of profound religious truths touched hearts and lives in the United States and beyond. People from around the world began to write to Helen for encouragement and support with their personal problems. She tried to answer as many of their letters as she could. She saw her correspondence as another form of service to God. Helen believed that her talent for easing human heartache through her verses was a God-given gift, one through which she could channel God’s love to the world.

When she retired from Gibson in 1971, she decided to retain an office there. This allowed her to continue working with Mary Jo Eling, her secretary, as they attempted to answer her volumes of correspondence. Rice insisted, “I go there every day, but I’m working for God now, not for Gibson.” She remained amazingly active until she was nearly 80 years old, despite the fact that she battled an increasingly painful and crippling arthritic condition.

Helen’s legacy is one of immense compassion. She remains one of America’s most prolific poets. She has been acclaimed as “the poet laureate of inspirational verse.” Her strong religious faith and ability to express deep emotion gave her poems a timeless appeal. She left behind a foundation so that her sizeable estate would be used to help the poor, the sick, and the needy. Helen believed that through this charitable foundation she would continue, even after her death, to give both inspiration and assistance to those in need. She said, “I only put to rhyme the truths God placed on my heart.”

The joy of unselfish giving

Time is not measured by the years that you live
But by the deeds that you do and the joy that you give.
And each day as it comes brings a chance to each one
To love to the fullest, leaving nothing undone
That would brighten the life or lighten the load
Of some weary traveler lost on life’s road.
So what does it matter how long we may live
If as long as we live we unselfishly give.
Helen Steiner Rice

(Jesus:) “Who might be comforted, encouraged, and blessed through your words if you would only put pen to paper? Helen didn’t personally know all the people her poems touched. She wrote because it gave her pleasure to do so, and because she felt that someone, somewhere, might be blessed through her poems with enough hope to carry on. What if that one person was your child, your spouse, someone dear to your heart? Helen’s faith is what motivated her love and care for those who looked to her for guidance and hope in dark times. But you don’t have to have the gift of writing poetry to convey God’s Spirit in a form that will help others. Consider what I have given you—whatever talent or gift—and put it to use. Whatever form My love takes as it pours through you, it is desperately needed in this world. It’s up to you to make use of it.”

For more information on Helen Steiner Rice:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Steiner_Rice

http://www.poemhunter.com/helen-steiner-rice/biography/

http://bit.ly/1S4DPFi

Dawson E. Trotman

Born: March 5, 1906, Bisbee, Arizona.

Died: June 18, 1956, Schroon Lake, New York, at age 50.

Quotation: “Do what others cannot and will not do. The greatest amount of wasted time is the time not getting started.”

Dawson Trotman, a California lumberyard worker, became a Christian after memorizing several verses of Scripture in a contest at church. Suddenly, John 1:12 and John 5:24 turned his life around. He began a Bible study group in his home that grew to become the movement known as the Navigators. This worldwide Christian organization supported various Christian ideals: maintaining the basic disciplines of the Christ-centered Spirit-filled life, abiding in the Word of God, the importance of personal follow-up, one-on-one discipleship training, Scripture memorization, and principles for multiplying Christian disciples, laborers, and equippers around the world. It was officially named the Navigators in 1934. Their mission as an international, interdenominational Christian ministry is to help people grow in Jesus Christ as they navigate through life.

Dawson and his friends extended their work to sailors in the U.S. Navy. There Dawson met a sailor, Les Spencer. They spent many hours together praying, studying the Bible, and memorizing Scripture. Dawson’s emphasis on living every area of life with and for the Lord came at an important time in Spencer’s life, who soon had 125 men on board the U.S.S. West Virginia who were growing in Christ and actively sharing their faith. By the end of World War II, thousands of men on ships and bases around the world were learning the principles of spiritual multiplication by the person-to-person teaching of God’s Word.



Dawson said, “You can’t treat a command in the Bible as advice. A command is a command!” He was a living protest against a form of Christianity that wanted to understand the Bible but wasn’t serious about obeying it.

In the early 1950s, Billy Graham, then a young, up-and-coming evangelist, pleaded with Dawson Trotman to help him follow up on the thousands who were committing their lives to Christ at his crusades. Dawson assigned key men to help Graham develop materials and train workers. Dawson and Graham became close friends.

Dr. Billy Graham said, “I think Dawson has personally touched more lives than anybody I have ever known.”

His work and writings were instrumental in the creation of the Campus Outreach ministry, which focuses on discipleship as a method of building up the community of Christians on college campuses. He wrote a book called Born to Reproduce, which has become a classic.

He drowned at Schroon Lake, possibly of a heart attack. He was attempting to rescue a girl who fell while water skiing. His wife and daughter carry on his work.


The Navigators is a worldwide Christian parachurch organization. Its purpose is the training of Christians, with a particular emphasis on enabling them to share their faith with others. The Navigators work alongside local churches by providing resources such as Bible study booklets and study aid materials, scripture memory aids, and Christian-oriented books.

Parachurch organizations are Christian faith-based organizations that work outside of and across denominations to engage in social welfare and evangelism, usually independent of church oversight.

(Jesus:) "Some people are afraid to let My Word really influence their lives because they don’t want to do what they feel it’s telling them to do. It’s hard to give up some things in life in order to follow through with what you believe I am asking of you. But I’ve promised not to give you burdens that are more than you can bear. I can show you a way to fulfill what I am speaking to your heart about. Dawson stepped out with just a Bible study, and I multiplied his efforts because he did what he could with what he had. What is important is your faithfulness to do what you can. What matters is the position of your heart and the desire to turn what you have into a tool to help others find My love and truth. I will bring the results as you are diligent to follow what I show you to the best of your ability. It’s not the number of years in a life but what is put into the years that makes a life complete.”

For more information see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawson_Trotman

http://bit.ly/1PNacXV

http://www.navigators.org/Home

http://www.navigators.org/About-Us/History

Netanyahu says UN chief Ban Ki-moon ‘encouraging terror’

BBC, 27 January 2016

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon of “encouraging terror”.

Referring to the Palestinians, Mr Ban said it was human nature for oppressed peoples to react to occupation.

Speaking at the UN Security Council, Mr Ban also condemned recent stabbings of Israelis by Palestinians.

More than 155 Palestinians, 28 Israelis, an American and an Eritrean have died in violence since October.

“The comments of the UN secretary general encourage terror,” Mr Netanyahu said in a statement. “There is no justification for terror.”

So cautious in his use of language for so long, Mr Ban seems determined to speak more plainly as he prepares to leave office, says the BBC’s Nick Bryant in New York.

Mr Ban told the Security Council the wave of attacks was driven by a “profound sense of alienation and despair” among some Palestinians, particularly the young.

“Palestinian frustration is growing under the weight of a half century of occupation and the paralysis of the peace process,” he said.

“As oppressed peoples have demonstrated throughout the ages, it is human nature to react to occupation, which often serves as a potent incubator of hate and extremism.”

He condemned the attacks but said Israel’s settlement-building programme cast doubt on its commitment to the creation of a Palestinian state.

Ronald S Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, said Mr Ban’s remarks were a “dangerous justification of terrorism”.

US-backed peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians collapsed in 2014.

The Palestinians complained that Israel was building settlements on land they claim for a future state.

Israel has approved the construction of 153 new settler homes in the West Bank, the NGO Peace Now said on Monday.

The move marked the end of an informal construction freeze in the West Bank that lasted for 18 months, Peace Now added.

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Prosseguindo para o Alvo

Compilação
Link

Não que eu já tenha obtido tudo isso ou tenha sido aperfeiçoado, mas prossigo para alcançá-lo, pois para isso também fui alcançado por Cristo Jesus. Irmãos, não penso que eu mesmo já o tenha alcançado, mas uma coisa faço: esquecendo-me das coisas que ficaram para trás e avançando para as que estão adiante, prossigo para o alvo, a fim de ganhar o prêmio do chamado celestial de Deus em Cristo Jesus.—Filipenses 3:12–14[1]

*

Quando penso no passado, algo que me ajuda é lembrar que o futuro não é limitado pelo nosso passado. Não importam suas antigas decisões ou de outras pessoas ou em que ponto se encontra agora, o futuro continua sendo tão promissor quanto as promessas de Deus, uma das quais diz que, “todas as coisas são possíveis ao que crê”.[2] Caso não se encontre na posição em que gostaria de estar, ainda há tempo para mudar!

Se uma decisão aparentemente teve um mau resultado, ou não foi o que você esperava, lembre-se que provavelmente ainda não viu o resultado total. O que lhe parece uma pedra ou serpente pode muito bem acabar sendo um pão, ou uma refeição completa de bênçãos.[3] Como Orson Welles certa vez disse, “Um desfecho feliz depende do ponto onde você interrompe a sua história.” Esse princípio com certeza se aplica aos que amam o Senhor, porque Ele vai fazer tudo contribuir para o nosso bem. Ou, podemos dizer, “Tudo vai dar certo no final; e se não tiver dado certo é porque ainda não é o final.”

Conte as suas bênçãos quando pensar no passado, não pense apenas nas situações que “poderiam ter sido”. Lembre-se das coisas boas, amáveis, admiráveis e dignas de louvor que compõem o mosaico da sua vida.[4] E agradeça ao Senhor pelas boas decisões tomadas anteriormente, e as outras que Ele o ajudará a tomar, além do futuro maravilhoso que terá junto com Jesus, tanto aquina terra como eternamente no Céu!—Maria Fontaine


Com os olhos na meta

O atleta em uma corrida não fica olhando para trás para ver quem vem atrás dele, senão pode tropeçar e cair de cara no chão. Pelo contrário, sua intenção é chegar à sua meta à frente. Quantas pessoas você conhece que parecem viver olhando para trás? Elas contam suas perdas, seus remorsos, seus fracassos. Não é de admirar que estejam derrotadas.

Graças a Deus pelo perdão! Em Cristo, encontramos perdão para os nossos próprios fracassos. Em Cristo podemos encontrar graça para perdoarmos até mesmo as mágoas mais profundas. De modo que Paulo não olha para trás. “Esquecendo” é o verbo gregoepilanthanomai, “não ter que lembrar de algo, esquecer.” Não acho que isso signifique que quaisquer lembranças de mágoas ou fracassos passados sejam totalmente apagados de nossas mentes, mas escolhemos não nos lembrar mais. Escolhemos esquecer. Escolhemos olhar para frente.

Não podemos correr a corrida olhando para trás. Temos que voltar nossas mentes e corações à corrida presente e à nossa meta. Paulo olha adiante, para a linha de chegada, a palavra grega skopos, vem de um radical que significa “olhar à distância”. Ou seja, o marco distante ao qual se deve olhar, a “meta ou o resultado que se tem em vista.”

Quando eu estava no ensino médio jogava no time de tênis do colégio. Quantas vezes meu técnico não gritou com a gente, “Mantenham os olhos na bola!” No baseball o batedor tem que ficar com os olhos na bola. Um cristão tem de ter os olhos na meta—submeter-se totalmente e comungar com Jesus Cristo. Se os nossos olhos caírem nas coisas temporais, perdemos o foco no mundo espiritual e a direção. Esqueça o que ficou para trás. Mantenha os olhos na meta!—Dr. Ralph F. Wilson


Almeje o que está adiante

Ninguém nunca venceu uma corrida focando no que já passou. Se quisermos permanecer nesta corrida até ao fim teremos que criar o hábito de esquecer.

Paulo tinha um passado, mas para ser eficaz para Cristo, ele teve que deixar seu passado para trás. Ele costumava espancar cristãos e colocá-los na prisão. Ele ajudou no assassinato de Estevão. Que tipo de discípulo inútil ele não teria sido se não tivesse confessado seus pecados passados e pedido perdão ao Senhor? Não se pode correr uma corrida quando se está arrastando a culpa do passado. É como tentar correr uma corrida com botas de chumbo. Se quiser se livrar do peso da culpa pelo seu passado, tem que confessar, pedir perdão ao Senhor, colocar tudo aos pés da Cruz, e escolher se distanciar disso. O Senhor vai perdoá-lo, mas se você escolher não perdoar a si mesmo, então estará escolhendo permanecer atrelado ao seu passado.

Enquanto ele ainda estava correndo a corrida, Paulo teve essa visão de pé na tribuna diante do Rei Jesus, e ouviu Jesus dizer: “Muito bem!” Esse era o seu foco. Seus olhos estavam no prêmio. Ele olhava adiante.

Não importa em que ponto do percurso você se encontra, siga em frente. Lute pelo o que está adiante. Dê tudo de si. Vai requerer tudo o que você tem para dar, mas com a ajuda de Deus, você chegará até ao fim. Que este seja o seu lema para o resto da vida:

“Uma coisa faço: esquecendo-me das coisas que ficaram para trás e avançando para as que estão adiante, prossigo para o alvo, a fim de ganhar o prêmio do chamado celestial de Deus em Cristo Jesus.”[5]—David McChesney


O caminho do justo

Quando fazemos uma retrospectiva do nosso passado, muitas vezes ficamos com remorso desejando ter feito isto, aquilo ou aquiloutro, ou pelo menos ter feito algumas coisas de uma maneira melhor.

O Senhor, melhor do que ninguém, sabe exatamente como nos sentimos, pois conhece o nosso coração e nossos pensamentos. Cada um deles, inclusive cada ato, está registrado no Seu livro, juntamente com os resultados dos pensamentos, ações e orações. Ali se encontram as mentes que foram mudadas, os corações tocados, as vidas transformadas e o efeito que tivemos nas pessoas ao nosso redor e no próprio mundo.

Quando refletimos no passado, deveríamos lembrar que a nossa visão é limitada e não é perfeita. Mas o Senhor vê o homem ou a mulher que está formando, a profunda compaixão adquirida, a sabedoria conquistada e a maturidade desenvolvida por meio de todas essas experiências. A Bíblia diz que o caminho do justo é como a luz da aurora, que brilha mais e mais até ser dia perfeito.[6] O Senhor prometeu iluminar a nossa vereda rumo ao futuro, levando-nos até ao dia da reconciliação completa Consigo.[7]—Maria Fontaine

Publicado no Âncora em janeiro de 2016.

[1] NVI.
[2] Marcos 9:23.
[3] Lucas 11:11–13.
[4] Filipenses 4:8.
[5] Filipenses 3:13–14 NVI.
[6] Provérbios 4:18.
[7] Colossenses 1:20.

Seek Ye First

By D. Brandt Berg Link

Audio length: 12:01

Download Audio (11MB)

The story of the final and crowning temptation that the Devil offered Jesus is found in Matthew 4: “Again, the devil taketh Him up into an exceeding high mountain, and showeth Him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them.” That’s the most riches anybody had ever been offered—the whole world. “And saith unto Him, ‘All these things will I give Thee, if Thou wilt fall down and worship me.’” There was the final crowning temptation the Devil tried on Jesus. What did Jesus answer? “Get thee hence, Satan: For it is written, ‘Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.’”1 Satan says, “Fall down and worship me!” Jesus said, “Get behind Me. God says you should only worship God.”

So the worship of the riches of this life is idolatry. The Lord warned us in Matthew 6:19–21 to “Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through and steal. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.” He says don’t bury your heart in those treasures, because those treasures will vanish away or get stolen, rust, corrupt, or rot—along with your heart. They’ll corrupt your heart!

The 24th verse says, “No man can serve two masters: For either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.” It’s impossible to serve two people equally. If you’ve got more than one boss, you’re bound to like one of them better than the other one. In fact, you may get to the point where you love one and hate the other. “Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

Jesus says: “I say unto you, take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on.”2 Don’t worry about whether you’re going to have anything to eat or enough to wear. Now there are two things that God knows you can’t possibly do without for very long—food and clothing. Jesus said don’t even worry about the things that you really have to have, much less the things that you don’t have to have, that you just want.

He says don’t even worry about the necessities of life. “Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?” He says, “Listen, don’t you know that I know that your life is more valuable than your food? And your body is much more valuable than the clothes that you put on it! I know it! I made your body, I gave you life. Don’t you think I’m going to take care of it? If I went to all the trouble to make something as valuable as your body and as priceless as your life, don’t you think I’m going to give you enough of your necessary food to eat, so it will keep you alive? And some raiment, some clothes, to wear to protect your body?”

If God made you and your life, He’ll certainly provide food and clothing for you. He’ll certainly take care of that body and that life He gave you.

“Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them.” They don’t have to reap and store up for the future. “Are you not much better than they?”3 He said, “Listen, if I can feed the birds, don’t you think I’m going to feed you?” Don’t you think you’re important enough that God will give you what you need?

“And which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? Why take ye thought for raiment?” Don’t worry about your clothes! Keep them clean, but don’t worry about whether you’re going to have any. He says, “Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin. And yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.”4 He says, “Here, look at the lilies. Look at these nice pretty flowers. God makes them, God clothes them, and they didn’t even work for it.” So, certainly God’s going to take care of you! If you serve Him, He’ll take care of you.

“Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is cast into the oven, shall He not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?”5 If He’s so careful to take care of the grass which only lasts a little while before somebody mows it down, casts it in the oven, and burns it, don’t you think He’s more concerned about you? He takes care of the grass, so He’ll surely take care of you, won’t He?

“Therefore take no thought”—that means fretting, anxious thought. It doesn’t mean never to prepare. We don’t go in there and sit down to the table, and say, “Okay now, God, feed us.” Somebody has to take a little thought, as far as preparation is concerned. That’s not the kind of thought it’s talking about. It’s talking about worrying, being afraid that you’re not going to get what you need. Don’t worry about, “What shall we eat, or how shall we be clothed? For after all these things do the Gentiles”—the unbelievers—“seek.”6

Many worldly people, that’s all they live for, all they work for. That’s their life: to have something to eat, drink, wear, and live in. They’re slaves of things.

I remember a friend of mine, when I was in college. One day, while he was out, some guy came in and stole his camera, typewriter, and everything else. You know, he had a better attitude about that loss than most Christians do. He acted relieved, believe it or not. He said, “I’m almost glad. I was getting to where I belonged to those things. I was a slave of those things, instead of them belonging to me and serving me.”

I wonder how many people own a car, or how many people cars own? I’m wondering how many people own houses, and how many houses own people? You can be a slave to your home, a slave to your car, a slave to things. They can own you instead of you owning them. You can be working for them instead of them working for you.

“For your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.” God knows your needs. Don’t be a slave of those things. Let them be your slave. Let them work for you; don’t work for them.

It’s not that there’s anything wrong with money, riches, or wealth—there’s nothing wrong with having money, riches or wealth. It all depends on whether you own money or the money owns you. It’s your attitude toward it. It all depends on how the money is used, whether the money or the wealth is using you or you’re using the wealth.

“But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and His righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you!”7 Put God’s kingdom first.

What is God’s kingdom? Jesus said it’s within you. What’s it composed of? What does He reign or rule over? He rules and reigns over the church. And what is the church? It is souls, people, His people! The kingdom of God is not a building or a denomination or an organization. It’s not this earthly ball. It’s the people who live on it who love Him.

Now if people are God’s kingdom, and if you’re going to seek first God’s kingdom, what are you going to seek? You’re going to seek souls for God’s kingdom. You’re going to do that which helps the kingdom of God: Be a witness and soul winner yourself, or help others to witness and win souls. You’re going to help advance the kingdom of God in some way.

To help His kingdom is to help people. In helping people, you’re helping God, because He wants to help people. And the way He helps people is through you and me. Then how are you going to seek first His kingdom? Getting God’s kingdom in you to begin with, and then getting other people into His kingdom. That’s seeking first the kingdom of God, by loving God first of all, and then loving your neighbor as yourself.

It says, “Seek first the kingdom of God.” There’s a greater and more important meaning of the word “first”—meaning foremost and above all, before everything else, above everything else, beyond everything else, and more than anything else. That means you’re seeking God’s kingdom more than anything else on this earth. First and above all!

It means working for God and others more than for yourself, more than for money, more than for riches, more than for pleasure, more than for health, more than for anything else. That’s seeking first the kingdom of God and His righteousness.

If you put Him and others first, He says, “All these things shall be added unto you.” If you put God first, won’t He give you all these other things if you need them? He might not give you everything you want. He might not give you everything you’d like to have, or sometimes not even the things you think you need to have, but He will give you what He knows you actually have to have for the sake of His kingdom.

Bible economics is utterly contrary to the economics of man. Man’s economics says: “Self-preservation is the first law of nature. I’m going to preserve myself and my own first.” The first law of man’s fallen human nature is: “I’m going to live for myself. First, I’m going to take care of myself. First, I’m going to get mine. Self-preservation.”

What is God’s law of economics? “He that would come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me. For he that loseth his life for My sake and the gospel’s shall save it; but he that saveth his life”—self-preservation—“the same shall lose it.”8

If you spend your life trying to save your life, Jesus says you’re going to lose your life. Spend your life losing your life to do God’s will, for His kingdom and others—that’s the secret of saving it. The secret to God’s economy is: “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.”

From a talk given in September 1962. Adapted and republished January 2016.
Read by Jon Marc.

1 Matthew 4:8–10.
2 Matthew 6:25.
3 Matthew 6:26.
4 Matthew 6:27–29.
5 Matthew 6:30.
6 Matthew 6:31–32.
7 Matthew 6:33.
8 Mark 8:34–35.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Speaking the Truth in Love

A compilation
Link


Audio length: 8:45
Download Audio (8MB)

Instead, we will speak the truth in love, growing in every way more and more like Christ.—Ephesians 4:151

*

We must strike a balance between conviction of the truth and graciousness or civility in manner. Some people, having strong convictions about their beliefs, can often lack civility in their demeanor. Yet others are so “nice” that they have no boldness and no conviction regarding standards of truth and morality. They are too cowardly to stand up for anything. The proper approach lies in the middle: both heartlessness and spinelessnessmust be replaced by speaking the truth in love.2—Paul Copan

*

People who looked to Jesus as their political savior were constantly befuddled by his choice of companions. He became known as a friend of tax collectors, a group clearly identified with the foreign exploiters, not the exploited. Though he denounced the religious system of his day, he treated a leader like Nicodemus with respect, and though he spoke against the dangers of money and of violence, he showed love and compassion toward a rich young ruler and a Roman centurion. In short, Jesus honored the dignity of people, whether he agreed with them or not. He would not found his kingdom on the basis of race or class or other such divisions. Anyone, even a half-breed with five husbands or a thief dying on a cross, was welcome to join his kingdom. The person was more important than any category or label.

I feel convicted by this quality of Jesus every time I get involved in a cause I strongly believe in. How easy it is to join the politics of polarization, to find myself shouting across the picket lines at the “enemy” on the other side. How hard it is to remember that the kingdom of God calls me to love the woman who has just emerged from the abortion clinic (and, yes, even her doctor), the promiscuous person who is dying of AIDS, the wealthy landowner who is exploiting God's creation. If I cannot show love to such people, then I must question whether I have truly understood Jesus' gospel.

A political movement by nature draws lines, makes distinctions, pronounces judgment; in contrast, Jesus' love cuts across lines, transcends distinctions, and dispenses grace. Regardless of the merits of a given issue … political movements risk pulling onto themselves the mantle of power that smothers love. From Jesus I learn that, whatever activism I get involved in, it must not drive out love and humility, or otherwise I betray the kingdom of heaven.—Philip Yancey

*

Without the work of the Spirit, no argument—no matter how persuasive—will be effective. But neither will any act of love nor any simple presentation of the gospel. Add the Spirit, though, and the equation changes dramatically. Here’s the key principle:Without God’s work, nothing else works; but with God’s work, many things work. Under the influence of the Holy Spirit, love persuades. By the power of God, the gospel transforms. And with Jesus at work, arguments convince. God is happy to use each of these methods.—Greg Koukl

*

One of the most effective ways to present the gospel to someone is to tell them what Christ has done for you. They may argue or ask all kinds of questions you may not know how to answer—but they can’t deny what Christ has done in your life. Take time to think through your own testimony, and then ask God to help you tell it briefly and clearly whenever He gives you the opportunity. The Bible says, “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.”3

In addition, pray for those around you who do not know Christ. You cannot pray consistently for someone to come to Christ but remain indifferent to them. Nor can you pray for their salvation without realizing that God may want to use you to touch their lives. Before prayer changes others, it first changes us.

But prayer is crucial in evangelism for another reason: Only God can change the heart of someone who is in rebellion against Him. No matter how logical our arguments or how fervent our appeals, our words will accomplish nothing unless God’s Spirit prepares the way.—Billy Graham4

*

If you have the love of Jesus, you cannot hide it. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid, and if men have a candlestick, they don’t put it under the table; they put it on the table that it may give light to the whole house.5 If you have this light, you cannot hide it—it’s impossible! We have to tell others about Jesus. If you believe it, if you have Him in your heart, if you have His love, you’ll show it; you’ll tell others and you’ll share it with them. This is what faith is all about—standing up and witnessing for Jesus and the truth. The Bible says, “He that winneth souls is wise.”6 It takes a lot of wisdom and a lot of love.

Your own personal testimony can be the most effective thing you have. The apostle Paul was a great witness, and he often started his witness before kings and judges, or whoever it was, with his own personal testimony: “This is what happened to me.” If you say it with sincerity in the power of the Holy Spirit in real earnestness and honesty, they will believe that you’re telling the truth. They will believe your testimony.

Once they believe that it’s possible for it to happen to you, then it’s possible for it to happen to others. If it’s happened once, it’s most likely to happen again, and it can happen to them. Once they admit the possibility, there’s a spark of faith, a mustard seed of faith that has been planted.

The cowboys in the U.S. have an old saying: “You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.” That’s true of people too. You can lead them to the truth, in love, but you can’t make them drink it. If they don’t want it, you can’t drink it for them. So to make the decision to receive the truth is their job, not ours. You can speak to their heart, but only the Spirit of God can really win their soul, their spirit.

Our job is to witness and to show them the Word. When you show them Revelation 3:20 and they see that He’s promised to come in if you ask Him to come in, God by His Spirit can quicken their faith to believe it so that He will come in, because the Word is the foundation of faith. “Faith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word about Christ.”7—David Brandt Berg

Published on Anchor January 2016. Read by Jason Lawrence.



1 NLT.


2 Ephesians 4:15.


3 1 Peter 3:15.


4 The Journey (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2006).


5 Matthew 5:14–15.


6 Proverbs 11:30.


7 Romans 10:17 NIV.

U.S. Relies Heavily on Saudi Money to Support Syrian Rebels

By Mark Mazzetti and Matt Apuzzo, NY Times, Jan. 23, 2016

WASHINGTON–When President Obama secretly authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to begin arming Syria’s embattled rebels in 2013, the spy agency knew it would have a willing partner to help pay for the covert operation. It was the same partner the C.I.A. has relied on for decades for money and discretion in far-off conflicts: the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Since then, the C.I.A. and its Saudi counterpart have maintained an unusual arrangement for the rebel-training mission, which the Americans have code-named Timber Sycamore. Under the deal, current and former administration officials said, the Saudis contribute both weapons and large sums of money, and the C.I.A takes the lead in training the rebels on AK-47 assault rifles and tank-destroying missiles.

The support for the Syrian rebels is only the latest chapter in the decadeslong relationship between the spy services of Saudi Arabia and the United States, an alliance that has endured through the Iran-contra scandal, support for the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan and proxy fights in Africa. Sometimes, as in Syria, the two countries have worked in concert. In others, Saudi Arabia has simply written checks underwriting American covert activities.

The joint arming and training program, which other Middle East nations contribute money to, continues as America’s relations with Saudi Arabia–and the kingdom’s place in the region–are in flux. The old ties of cheap oil and geopolitics that have long bound the countries together have loosened as America’s dependence on foreign oil declines and the Obama administration tiptoes toward a diplomatic rapprochement with Iran.

And yet the alliance persists, kept afloat on a sea of Saudi money and a recognition of mutual self-interest. In addition to Saudi Arabia’s vast oil reserves and role as the spiritual anchor of the Sunni Muslim world, the long intelligence relationship helps explain why the United States has been reluctant to openly criticize Saudi Arabia for its human rights abuses, its treatment of women and its support for the extreme strain of Islam, Wahhabism, that has inspired many of the very terrorist groups the United States is fighting. The Obama administration did not publicly condemn Saudi Arabia’s public beheading this month of a dissident Shiite cleric, Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr, who had challenged the royal family.

Although the Saudis have been public about their help arming rebel groups in Syria, the extent of their partnership with the C.I.A.’s covert action campaign and their direct financial support had not been disclosed. Details were pieced together in interviews with a half-dozen current and former American officials and sources from several Persian Gulf countries. Most spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the program.

From the moment the C.I.A. operation was started, Saudi money supported it.

“They understand that they have to have us, and we understand that we have to have them,” said Mike Rogers, the former Republican congressman from Michigan who was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee when the C.I.A. operation began. Mr. Rogers declined to discuss details of the classified program.

The White House has embraced the covert financing from Saudi Arabia–and from Qatar, Jordan and Turkey–at a time when Mr. Obama has pushed gulf nations to take a greater security role in the region.

Spokesmen for both the C.I.A. and the Saudi Embassy in Washington declined to comment.

When Mr. Obama signed off on arming the rebels in the spring of 2013, it was partly to try to gain control of the apparent free-for-all in the region. The Qataris and the Saudis had been funneling weapons into Syria for more than a year. The Qataris had even smuggled in shipments of Chinese-made FN-6 shoulder-fired missiles over the border from Turkey.

The Saudi efforts were led by the flamboyant Prince Bandar bin Sultan, at the time the intelligence chief, who directed Saudi spies to buy thousands of AK-47s and millions of rounds of ammunition in Eastern Europe for the Syrian rebels. The C.I.A. helped arrange some of the arms purchases for the Saudis, including a large deal in Croatia in 2012.

By the summer of 2012, a freewheeling feel had taken hold along Turkey’s border with Syria as the gulf nations funneled cash and weapons to rebel groups–even some that American officials were concerned had ties to radical groups like Al Qaeda.

The C.I.A. was mostly on the sidelines during this period, authorized by the White House under the Timber Sycamore training program to deliver nonlethal aid to the rebels but not weapons. In late 2012, according to two former senior American officials, David H. Petraeus, then the C.I.A. director, delivered a stern lecture to intelligence officials of several gulf nations at a meeting near the Dead Sea in Jordan. He chastised them for sending arms into Syria without coordinating with one another or with C.I.A. officers in Jordan and Turkey.

Months later, Mr. Obama gave his approval for the C.I.A. to begin directly arming and training the rebels from a base in Jordan, amending the Timber Sycamore program to allow lethal assistance. Under the new arrangement, the C.I.A. took the lead in training, while Saudi Arabia’s intelligence agency, the General Intelligence Directorate, provided money and weapons, including TOW anti-tank missiles.

The Qataris have also helped finance the training and allowed a Qatari base to be used as an additional training location. But American officials said Saudi Arabia was by far the largest contributor to the operation.

While the Obama administration saw this coalition as a selling point in Congress, some, including Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, raised questions about why the C.I.A. needed Saudi money for the operation, according to one former American official. Mr. Wyden declined to be interviewed, but his office released a statement calling for more transparency. “Senior officials have said publicly that the U.S. is trying to build up the battlefield capabilities of the anti-Assad opposition, but they haven’t provided the public with details about how this is being done, which U.S. agencies are involved, or which foreign partners those agencies are working with,” the statement said.

When relations among the countries involved in the training program are strained, it often falls to the United States to broker solutions. As the host, Jordan expects regular payments from the Saudis and the Americans. When the Saudis pay late, according to a former senior intelligence official, the Jordanians complain to C.I.A. officials.

While the Saudis have financed previous C.I.A. missions with no strings attached, the money for Syria comes with expectations, current and former officials said. “They want a seat at the table, and a say in what the agenda of the table is going to be,” said Bruce Riedel, a former C.I.A. analyst and now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

The C.I.A. training program is separate from another program to arm Syrian rebels, one the Pentagon ran that has since ended. That program was designed to train rebels to combat Islamic State fighters in Syria, unlike the C.I.A.’s program, which focuses on rebel groups fighting the Syrian military.

While the intelligence alliance is central to the Syria fight and has been important in the war against Al Qaeda, a constant irritant in American-Saudi relations is just how much Saudi citizens continue to support terrorist groups, analysts said.

“The more that the argument becomes, ‘We need them as a counterterrorism partner,’ the less persuasive it is,” said William McCants, a former State Department counterterrorism adviser and the author of a book on the Islamic State. “If this is purely a conversation about counterterrorism cooperation, and if the Saudis are a big part of the problem in creating terrorism in the first place, then how persuasive of an argument is it?”

In the near term, the alliance remains solid, strengthened by a bond between spy masters. Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, the Saudi interior minister who took over the effort to arm the Syrian rebels from Prince Bandar, has known the C.I.A. director, John O. Brennan, from the time Mr. Brennan was the agency’s Riyadh station chief in the 1990s. Former colleagues say the two men remain close, and Prince Mohammed has won friends in Washington with his aggressive moves to dismantle terrorist groups like Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

The job Mr. Brennan once held in Riyadh is, more than the ambassador’s, the true locus of American power in the kingdom. Former diplomats recall that the most important discussions always flowed through the C.I.A. station chief.

Current and former intelligence officials say there is a benefit to this communication channel: The Saudis are far more responsive to American criticism when it is done in private, and this secret channel has done more to steer Saudi behavior toward America’s interests than any public chastising could have.

The roots of the relationship run deep. In the late 1970s, the Saudis organized what was known as the “Safari Club”–a coalition of nations including Morocco, Egypt and France–that ran covert operations around Africa at a time when Congress had clipped the C.I.A.’s wings over years of abuses.

“And so the kingdom, with these countries, helped in some way, I believe, to keep the world safe at a time when the United States was not able to do that,” Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former head of Saudi intelligence, recalled in a speech at Georgetown University in 2002.

In the 1980s, the Saudis helped finance C.I.A. operations in Angola, where the United States backed rebels against the Soviet-allied government. While the Saudis were staunchly anticommunist, Riyadh’s primary incentive seemed to be to solidify its C.I.A. ties. “They were buying good will,” recalled one former senior intelligence officer who was involved in the operation.

In perhaps the most consequential episode, the Saudis helped arm the mujahedeen rebels to drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan. The United States committed hundreds of millions of dollars each year to the mission, and the Saudis matched it, dollar for dollar.

The money flowed through a C.I.A.-run Swiss bank account. In the book “Charlie Wilson’s War,” the journalist George Crile III describes how the C.I.A. arranged for the account to earn no interest, in keeping with the Islamic ban on usury.

In 1984, when the Reagan administration sought help with its secret plan to sell arms to Iran to finance the contra rebels in Nicaragua, Robert C. McFarlane, the national security adviser, met with Prince Bandar, who was the Saudi ambassador to Washington at the time. The White House made it clear that the Saudis would “gain a considerable amount of favor” by cooperating, Mr. McFarlane later recalled.

Prince Bandar pledged $1 million per month to help fund the contras, in recognition of the administration’s past support to the Saudis. The contributions continued after Congress cut off funding to the contras. By the end, the Saudis had contributed $32 million, paid through a Cayman Islands bank account.

When the Iran-contra scandal broke, and questions arose about the Saudi role, the kingdom kept its secrets. Prince Bandar refused to cooperate with the investigation led by Lawrence E. Walsh, the independent counsel.

In a letter, the prince declined to testify, explaining that his country’s “confidences and commitments, like our friendship, are given not just for the moment but the long run.”

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Israel Says Will Seize West Bank Land; Demolishes EU Structures

Reuters, Jan. 21, 2016 --

JERUSALEM–Israel confirmed on Thursday it was planning to appropriate a large tract of fertile land in the occupied West Bank, close to Jordan, a move likely to exacerbate tensions with Western allies and already drawing international condemnation.

In an email sent to Reuters, COGAT, a unit of Israel’s Defence Ministry, said the political decision to seize the territory had been taken and “the lands are in the final stages of being declared state lands”.

The appropriation, covers 154 hectares (380 acres) in the Jordan Valley close to Jericho, an area where Israel already has many settlement farms built on land Palestinians seek for a state. It is the largest land seizure since August 2014.

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon denounced the move and Palestinian officials said they would push for a resolution at the United Nations against Israel’s settlement policies.

“Settlement activities are a violation of international law and run counter to the public pronouncements of the government of Israel supporting a two-state solution to the conflict,” Ban said in a statement.

The land, in an area fully under Israeli civilian and military control and already used by Jewish settlers to farm dates, is situated near the northern tip of the Dead Sea.

Palestinian officials denounced the seizure.

“Israel is stealing land specially in the Jordan Valley under the pretext it wants to annex it,” Hanan Ashrawi, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, told Reuters. “This should be a reason for a real and effective intervention by the international community to end such a flagrant and grave aggression which kills all chances of peace.”

The United States, whose ambassador angered Israel this week with criticism of its West Bank policy, said it was strongly opposed to any moves that accelerate settlement expansion.

“We believe they’re fundamentally incompatible with a two-state solution and call into question, frankly, the Israeli government’s commitment to a two-state solution,” Deputy State Department spokesman Mark Toner said on Wednesday.

In a development likely to further upset Europe, Israeli forces demolished six structures in the West Bank funded by the EU’s humanitarian arm. The structures were dwellings and latrines for Bedouins living in an area known as E1–a particularly sensitive zone between Jerusalem and the Dead Sea.

“This is the third time they demolished my house and every time I rebuilt it, this time also I will rebuild it and I am not leaving here. If we leave they will turn the place into a closed military zone,” said Saleem Jahaleen, whose home was razed.

Israeli officals did not respond to requests for comment on the demolitions. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last week the EU was building illegally in the area.

There are now about 550,000 Jewish settlers living in the West Bank and East Jerusalem combined, according to Israeli government and think-tank statistics. About 350,000 Palestinians live in East Jerusalem and 2.7 million in West Bank.

Israel is hoping that in any final agreement with the Palestinians it will be able to keep large settlement blocs including in the Jordan Valley, both for security and agricultural purposes. The Palestinians are adamantly opposed.

Russia to Strengthen Military in Response to NATO Expanding Drills

(Reuters) --  Russia will form four new military divisions this year to strengthen its western and central regions in response to the increase in NATO drills, Russian news agencies cited a senior defense ministry officials as saying.

(Dennis) -- Could this be preparation for the future invasion of the Middle East at the beginning of the Great Tribulation, when a combined military force invades Israel?

The Russian ruble has hit a new low against the dollar as oil prices continue to slide

By James Ellingworth,   Associated Press, Jan. 21, 2016

MOSCOW (AP)–The Russian ruble has hit another historic low against the dollar as currencies slid across the former Soviet Union against the backdrop of low oil prices.

The ruble traded above 85 to the dollar for the first time in Moscow early Thursday afternoon, a fall of more than three percent, which beat the previous low of 82.4 to the dollar set in trading Wednesday evening. It later recovered slightly to trade around 84.2.

Thursday’s slip means the ruble is at its lowest level since the currency was redenominated in 1998, during Russia’s worst post-Soviet economic crisis. President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov, however, said the situation was not critical.

“I wouldn’t use the word ‘collapse.’ The rate is really changing, the rate is volatile, but it’s far from a collapse,” he said Thursday in comments reported by Russian news agencies. Putin has no plans for any emergency meetings, he added.

The steep decline in oil prices–now at a 12-year low below $28 a barrel–has been a severe blow to Russia’s oil-dependent economy. The ruble’s new lows this week follow the lifting of international sanctions against Iran, which increases the supply of oil on global markets.

The IMF predicted Tuesday that Russia’s economy will contract 1 percent in 2016 following a fall of 3.7 percent last year, before returning to 1 percent growth next year. The ruble has lost more than half its value against the dollar in the last two years.

Thursday’s fall in the ruble was accompanied by slides in other post-Soviet currencies. The Belarusian ruble slid 5.1 percent to the dollar, trading at 21.564 Thursday afternoon. It has lost around 14 percent of its value against the dollar since January 1.

In the Central Asian nation of Kazakhstan, another major ex-Soviet oil producer, the tenge currency fell to a record 383.91 against the dollar Thursday as the economy feels the pressure of low energy prices. Central bank head Daniyar Akishev ruled out introducing capital controls and said he did not expect major shocks for the country’s balance of payments since “most of the negative scenarios … have already happened.”

By 2050, there will be more plastic than fish in the world’s oceans, study says

By Sarah Kaplan,  Washington Post, January 20, 2016 -

There is a lot of plastic in the world’s oceans.

It coagulates into great floating “garbage patches” that cover large swaths of the Pacific. It washes up on urban beaches and remote islands, tossed about in the waves and transported across incredible distances before arriving, unwanted, back on land. It has wound up in the stomachs of more than half the world’s sea turtles and nearly all of its marine birds, studies say. And if it was bagged up and arranged across all of the world’s shorelines, we could build a veritable plastic barricade between ourselves and the sea.

But that quantity pales in comparison with the amount that the World Economic Forum expects will be floating into the oceans by the middle of the century.

If we keep producing (and failing to properly dispose of) plastics at predicted rates, plastics in the ocean will outweigh fish pound for pound in 2050, the nonprofit foundation said in a report Tuesday.

According to the report, worldwide use of plastic has increased 20-fold in the past 50 years, and it is expected to double again in the next 20 years. By 2050, we’ll be making more than three times as much plastic stuff as we did in 2014.

Meanwhile, humans do a terrible job of making sure those products are reused or otherwise disposed of: About a third of all plastics produced escape collection systems, only to wind up floating in the sea or the stomach of some unsuspecting bird. That amounts to about 8 million metric tons a year–or, as Jenna Jambeck of the University of Georgia put it to The Washington Post in February, “Five bags filled with plastic for every foot of coastline in the world.”

The report came a day before the start of the glitzy annual meeting arranged by the World Economic Forum to discuss the global economy. This year’s meeting in Davos, Switzerland, is centered on what the WEF terms “the fourth industrial revolution”–the boom in high-tech areas like robotics and biotechnology–and its effect on the widening gulf between the wealthy and the world’s poor.

But the plastic situation–fairly low-tech and more than a century old at this point–is a reminder that we still haven’t quite gotten the better of some of the problems left over from the first few “industrial revolutions.”

According to the report, more than 70 percent of the plastic we produce is either put in a landfill or lost to the world’s waterways and other infrastructure. Plastic production accounts for 6 percent of global oil consumption (a number that will hit 20 percent in 2050) and 1 percent of the global carbon budget (the maximum amount of emissions the world can produce to prevent global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius). In 2050, the report says, we’ll be spending 15 percent of our carbon budget on soda bottles, plastic grocery bags and the like.

Once it gets washed into waterways, the damage caused by plastics’ presence costs about $13 billion annually in losses for the tourism, shipping and fishing industries. It disrupts marine ecosystems and threatens food security for people who depend on subsistence fishing.

Besides which, all that plastic in the water isn’t too great for the animals trying to live there.

The data in the report comes from interviews with more than 180 experts and analysis of some 200 studies on “the plastic economy.”

The report was published on the same day that a study came out in the journal Nature Communications asserting that the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization is drastically underestimating the overfishing of the oceans. The study, from researchers Daniel Pauly and Dirk Zeller of the University of British Columbia’s Sea Around Us project, found that global catches between 1950 and 2010 were probably 50 percent higher than previously thought–meaning that damage to the world’s fish stocks was also much worse.

Overall, it was not a good news day for anyone with fins.

But both reports gave some signs for optimism. Pauly and Zeller told The Washington Post that the underestimation of how much humans were fishing means the U.N. also underestimated how much fish the oceans can provide.

“If we rebuild stocks, we can rebuild to more than we thought before,” Pauly said. “Basically, the oceans are more productive than we thought before.”


Copyright © Fight for Your Faith