FDA Approves New Moderna mRNA Flu Vaccine!
Friday, August 7, 2026
Thursday, August 6, 2026
Wednesday, June 3, 2026
Thursday, March 26, 2026
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
On the Road to the Mark of the Beast - Coming Soon to Your Country
6G AI Brain Chips, Self-Assembling Implants, and the CIA Document That Buried Anti-Parasitic Cancer Research for Over 50 YearsEpidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher on The Daily Pulse with Maria Zeee
Yesterday on The Daily Pulse with Maria Zeee, we discussed the rapid acceleration of biological implant technologies being developed under the banners of telecommunications infrastructure, artificial intelligence, and biomedical innovation. Many people still assume these ideas belong to science fiction, but the reality is that governments, defense agencies, and technology companies are actively pursuing systems designed to integrate electronics, nanotechnology, and biological systems directly into the human body. These developments are closely tied to the infrastructure now being built for 6G wireless networks, which government documents openly state will support implantable technologies. What we are witnessing is the early architecture of a transhumanist future—one where the boundary between humans and machines begins to dissolve. We also discussed a CIA-classified report summarizing Soviet cancer research that remained buried for more than 50 years. The report suggested that anti-parasitic drugs might also attack malignant tumors—a line of inquiry that today is finally gaining attention after decades of neglect. 6G AI Brain Chips (BISC)
Trump recently signed a directive to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to operate implantable technologies. This likely involves a new paper-thin AI BRAIN CHIP known as the Biological Interface System to Cortex (BISC).  This system involves an ultra-thin semiconductor chip that can be implanted directly into the brain. The device contains tens of thousands of electrodes capable of recording neural activity and transmitting that information wirelessly. This represent one of the first serious attempts to merge human consciousness with artificial intelligence. I will NOT take the 6g AI brain chip. Gates-Funded Microneedle Patch “Vaccines” and Quantum Dot Identifiers
A new Gates Foundation-funded microneedle patch implant installs BOTH mRNA and permanent quantum-dot “QR codes” under your skin. Originally developed in 2019, it’s been upgraded in 2025 with AI-readable tags that store your vaccine data—scannable directly from your wrist.
Planned for deployment during the next plandemic — a biological “vaccine” passport controlling who can shop, dine, or travel.
Gates-Funded Self-Assembling Birth Control Implants
A study published in Nature Chemical Engineering titled “Self-aggregating long-acting injectable microcrystals” reveals Bill Gates’s latest investment. As expected, this “innovation” does not improve the health of humanity by any means, but instead seeks to further reduce already-collapsing birth rates.
The technology, dubbed SLIM (Self-aggregating Long-acting Injectable Microcrystals), enables the self injection of microcrystals that self-assemble into a semi-permanent drug implant. The implant slowly releases synthetic hormones like levonorgestrel—a potent contraceptive—over months to years. This technology is designed to provide long-duration fertility suppression through a single injection. The CIA Document That Delayed Cancer ResearchMore than 60 years ago, the CIA classified a scientific report summarizing 1950 Soviet research from Leningrad examining biochemical similarities between parasitic organisms and malignant tumors. The study noted that parasites and cancer cells share key metabolic features, including strong anaerobic metabolism and large glycogen stores.
The report also documented that an anti-parasitic drug—Myracil-D—was effective against bilharzia parasites and showed activity against cancerous tumors in laboratory experiments. The report was classified and effectively buried for decades, only being publicly released in 2011. The result was that an important line of cancer research remained largely unexplored for more than half a century. The largest systematic review ever conducted on ivermectin use in cancer patients identified 14 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across 12 cancer types and reported no safety concerns.
A recent study by Dr. William Makis documented complete remission of Stage IV cancers in patients treated with fenbendazole. The paper was recently unethically retracted by the Chemo Cartel.
Taken together, these findings suggest that a major avenue of cancer research—repurposing anti-parasitic drugs as anti-cancer therapies—may have been delayed for more than 50 years. ConclusionThe technologies discussed are not science fiction. They are already being developed and tested today. Brain-computer interfaces, self-assembling injectable nanotechnologies, biological identification markers, and long-acting implants represent the early stages of a new technological paradigm in which human biology becomes directly integrated with AI. Once biological implants and AI-integrated systems become normalized, reversing course may be impossible. As with smartphones today, It will become increasingly difficult to function in modern society without being implanted with these technologies. We are headed down a dangerous path to dystopia. Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation www.mcculloughfnd.org Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content. |
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Covid Vaccine Linked to Febrile Seizure Risk
Toxic Exposures
Moderna COVID Vaccine Linked to Higher Risk of Febrile Seizure
Children who received Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine had a statistically significant higher risk of having a febrile seizure within a day of vaccination, according to a peer-reviewed study by the FDA. It’s unclear if the FDA warned the public about the risk when the study was first published as a preprint.
February 10, 2026
Children who received Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine were at higher risk of a febrile seizure within one day of vaccination than within 8-63 days after vaccination, according to a peer-reviewed study by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Among kids ages 2 to 4, the risk was roughly two-and-a-half times higher, according to the report, published Feb. 4 in Vaccine.
The FDA funded the study and conducted it as part of its Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) System. However, the report included a disclaimer stating that it “should not be construed to represent FDA’s views or policies.”
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) senior research scientist, said it was noteworthy that an FDA-led study confirming a vaccine’s downside was published in a major journal. “That likely wouldn’t have happened a few years ago,” he said.
The FDA did not respond to The Defender when asked if the agency publicly announced the febrile seizure safety signal for Moderna’s vaccine in March 2024, when the study was first published as a preprint.
Last month, the FDA asked the makers of several flu vaccines to add a warning that the vaccines can cause febrile seizures in young children.
CDC website cites reports of febrile seizures, but no longer recommends COVID vaccination for kids
On its website on COVID-19 vaccine safety, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledges that febrile seizures have been reported after vaccination with Moderna’s shot, including during Moderna’s clinical trial.
At the time of the study, both Moderna and Pfizer’s shots were authorized for emergency use for children under 5. Now, Pfizer’s shot is licensed only for kids 5 and up. Moderna’s shot is licensed for infants and children 6 months and up.
However, the CDC no longer recommends routine COVID-19 vaccination for children. On Oct. 6, 2025, the agency updated its recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination for children 6 months and older, advising “individual-based decision-making.”
Daniel O’Connor, founder and CEO of TrialSite News, which first reported on the FDA study, said now that there’s no blanket recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination for children, the data revealed by the FDA “helps parents weigh real benefits against real risks” of vaccination.
TrialSite News claimed the FDA’s study had “no signal” that “suggested persistent or delayed neurological harm.”
But Jablonowski called that claim “baseless” because the study didn’t evaluate long-term neurological conditions — the authors looked only at claims filed up to 63 days after vaccination.
Neurological harm “would likely only be evident throughout the child’s development and not confined to the 63 observation days,” Jablonowski said.
The study’s corresponding author did not respond to our comment request by the deadline.
‘Mild’ febrile seizures can double children’s risk of epilepsy
Febrile seizures are convulsions most often caused by fevers triggered by infections related to common childhood illnesses. The seizures typically occur in children 6 months to 5 years old when they have a fever over 100.4 F.
Most febrile seizures last less than 15 minutes and are not life-threatening. According to Medpage Today, they “do not cause any permanent harm and do not have any lasting effects.”
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., CHD’s chief scientific officer, disagreed. “Any seizure is bad, period,” he said.
Hooker said that “‘mild’ febrile seizures can double a child’s chance of an epilepsy diagnosis and ‘complex’ febrile seizures, which last more than 15 minutes, can increase that risk up to 10 times.”
Jablonowski said a 2023 review in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology showed that “febrile seizures occurring during neurodevelopment … may ‘ultimately lead to disease.’”
A 2024 review in Pediatric Neurology concluded that “febrile seizures can lead to negative lifelong consequences such as cognitive deficits, brain abnormalities, and the development of temporal lobe epilepsy in a subset of children.”
This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.
The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.
Moderna vaccine had ‘substantially more DNA contamination’
The study authors analyzed health claims from roughly mid-2022 to mid-2023 for kids ages 2 to 5 from three insurance companies, including Carelon Research, CVS Health and Optum. The companies accounted for roughly 17% of all U.S. pediatric claims, according to the authors.
The authors compared the number of febrile seizures reported 0-1 days after getting Moderna or Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine with the number reported 8-63 days after vaccination.
The Moderna vaccine showed a statistically significant increase in febrile seizures in the first day after vaccination. Pfizer’s vaccine also showed an increase, but it wasn’t statistically significant.
Neither shot showed a statistically significant increase in febrile seizures when the study authors looked at the whole first week after vaccination, rather than days 0-1. However, the authors found that the risk of both febrile and non-febrile seizures more than doubled in the week after vaccination for both the Pfizer and Moderna shots, compared to the following 8 weeks — and the finding was statistically significant.
It biologically makes sense that Moderna’s shot would induce more febrile seizures than the Pfizer shot, Jablonowski said. A child’s dose of Moderna’s shot contains 25 micrograms (mcg) of mRNA while Pfizer’s shot contains only 3 mcg, he said.
“Moderna also had substantially more DNA contamination than Pfizer, which could immediately activate the innate immune system.”
Related articles in The Defender
