Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Sunday, July 5, 2015

Nicholas Winton, Rescuer of 669 Children From Holocaust, Dies at 106

By Robert D. McFadden, NY Times, July 1, 2015

Nicholas Winton, a Briton who said nothing for a half-century about his role in organizing the escape of 669 mostly Jewish children from Czechoslovakia on the eve of World War II, a righteous deed like those of Oskar Schindler and Raoul Wallenberg, died on Wednesday in Maidenhead, England. He was 106.

It was only after Mr. Winton’s wife found a scrapbook in the attic of their home in 1988–a dusty record of names, pictures and documents detailing a story of redemption from the Holocaust–that he spoke of his all-but-forgotten work in the deliverance of children who, like the parents who gave them up to save their lives, were destined for Nazi concentration camps and extermination.

For all his ensuing honors and accolades in books and films, Mr. Winton was a reluctant hero, often compared to Schindler, the ethnic German who saved 1,200 Jews by employing them in his enamelware and munitions factories in Poland and Czechoslovakia, and to Wallenberg, the Swedish businessman and diplomat who used illegal passports and legation hideaways to save tens of thousands of Jews in Nazi-occupied Hungary.

Mr. Winton–Sir Nicholas in England since 2003, when he was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II–was a London stockbroker in December 1938 when, on an impulse, he canceled a Swiss skiing vacation and flew to Prague at the behest of a friend who was aiding refugees in the Sudetenland, the western region of Czechoslovakia that had just been annexed by Germany.

“Don’t bother to bring your skis,” the friend, Martin Blake, advised in a phone call.

Mr. Winton found vast camps of refugees living in appalling conditions. The pogroms of Kristallnacht, the “Night of Broken Glass,” had recently struck Jewish shops, homes and synagogues in Germany and Austria. War looked inevitable, and escape, especially for children, seemed hopeless, given the restrictions against Jewish immigration in the West.

Britain, however, was an exception. In late 1938, it began a program, called Kindertransport, to admit unaccompanied Jewish children up to age 17 if they had a host family, with the offer of a 50-pound warranty for an eventual return ticket. The Refugee Children’s Movement in Britain sent representatives to Germany and Austria, and 10,000 Jewish children were saved before the war began.

But there was no comparable mass-rescue effort in Czechoslovakia. Mr. Winton created one. It involved dangers, bribes, forgery, secret contacts with the Gestapo, nine railroad trains, an avalanche of paperwork and a lot of money. Nazi agents started following him. In his Prague hotel room, he met terrified parents desperate to get their children to safety, although it meant surrendering them to strangers in a foreign land.

As their numbers grew, a storefront office was opened. Long lines attracted Gestapo attention. Perilous confrontations were resolved with bribes. Eventually he registered more than 900 children, although he had names and details on 5,000. In early 1939, he left two friends, Trevor Chadwick and Bill Barazetti, in charge in Prague and returned to London to find foster homes, raise money and arrange transportation.

He and a few volunteers, including his mother, calling themselves the British Committee for Refugees from Czechoslovakia, Children’s Section, enlisted aid from the Refugee Children’s Movement, had photos of the children printed and appealed for funds and foster homes in newspaper ads and church and synagogue bulletins.

Hundreds of families volunteered to take children, and money trickled in from donors–not enough to cover all the costs, but Mr. Winton made up the difference himself. He also appealed to the Home Office for entry visas, but the response was slow and time was short. “This was a few months before the war broke out,” he recalled. “So we forged the Home Office entry permits.”

In Prague, Mr. Chadwick quietly cultivated the chief of the Gestapo, Karl Bömelburg–they called him “the criminal rat” after his inspector’s rank of kriminalrat–and arranged for forged transit papers and bribes to be passed to key Nazis and Czech railway officials, who threatened to halt trains or seize the children unless they were paid off. The Gestapo chief proved instrumental, clearing the trains and transit papers, Mr. Chadwick said.

Mr. Winton sent more money, some for bribes and some to cover expenses for children whose parents had been arrested and shot or had fled into hiding, while many of the Czech families sold possessions to pay for their children’s escape. The red tape and paperwork seemed endless.

But on March 14, 1939, it all came together. Hours before Hitler dismembered the Czech provinces of Bohemia and Moravia as a German “Protectorate,” the first 20 children left Prague on a train. Survivors told of searing scenes on the station platform in the final moments before departure as children sobbed and pleaded not to be sent away and parents faced giving up their children.

Mr. Winton and his colleagues later arranged for eight more trains to get the rest of the children out, crossing the Third Reich through Nuremberg and Cologne to the Hook of Holland, then across the North Sea by boat to Harwich, Essex, and on by British rail to the Liverpool Street Station in London. There, he and the host families met the children. Each refugee had a small bag and wore a name tag.

But only seven of the eight trains made it through, the last in early August, bringing the total rescued to 669. About 250 children, the largest group, were on board the last train out, on Sept. 1, 1939. On that day, however, Hitler invaded Poland, all borders controlled by Germany were closed and Mr. Winton’s rescue efforts came to an end.

“Within hours of the announcement, the train disappeared,” he recalled. “None of the 250 children aboard was ever seen again.” All were believed to have perished in concentration camps.

Nearly all the saved children were orphans by war’s end, their parents killed at Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen or Theresienstadt. After the war, many remained in Britain, but others returned to Czechoslovakia or emigrated to Israel, Australia or the United States. The survivors, many now in their 70s and 80s, still call themselves “Winton’s Children.”

Venus and Jupiter’s Proximity Leads to Prophetic Speculation

By Melody Dareing, June 30, 2015

A unique sight produced by Venus and Jupiter’s proximity leads to prophetic speculation among those who believe in Biblical prophecy. The two planets will draw incredibly close to each other beginning tonight, June 30, in the constellation of the Lion. The proximity of the two planets to the star Regulus, the brightest star in the Leo constellation, makes for an unusual occurrence that will produce what will look like one bright star in the western sky.

The event, which scientists said last occurred 2,000 years ago, has been dubbed “The Star of Bethlehem” because many theorize the event is what the wise men following the star actually saw, rather than one bright star. This event will last only a few days of visibility with the naked eye although it will be able to be seen with a telescope for more than a year. The wise men, if one believes scripture and Middle Eastern historical evidence, followed the star for at least a year before they found baby Jesus, who was then living in an apartment with his family.

Part of the wonder involved with this celestial event of Venus and Jupiter is the study of the Bethlehem Star by Johannes Kepler, a non-scientist who took on studying the original event thousands of years ago. He determined the alignment being seen this week was, in fact, the star, and that the event played into Biblical prophecy.

According to Kepler, Venus and Jupiter aligning in Leo points to the Jewish tribe of Judah, known as the Lion tribe, which is located within ancient prophecies regarding the Messiah. The researcher concluded that the conjunction happened at the beginning the Jewish New Year. Additionally, Virgo is the constellation rising in the east behind Leo as Jupiter and Regulus made their first close contact. Virgo is tied to the image of a virgin. Virgo, in the event 2,000 years ago, received the Sun’s rays and was above a new moon. According to John in the Book of Revelation, the virgin was clothed in the Sun with a moon at her feet. Kepler thinks this verse refers to this event.

Saturday, July 4, 2015

How About a Global Currency?

By Leonid Bershidsky, Bloomberg, July 1, 2015

It’s almost a truism to say that membership in the euro exacerbated the Greek crisis. The thinking goes like this: Because Greece doesn’t have its own currency, it couldn’t increase its competitiveness and boost growth through devaluation. Although devaluation is a valuable instrument, I think most countries and companies would benefit if the world, not just Europe, used a single currency.

Today’s fragmented financial world is unfair. On the one hand, there’s Denmark with such a glut of currency, local and foreign, that its central bank’s key deposit rate is minus 0.75 percent and companies are considering overpaying their taxes because the Tax Ministry pays 1 percent interest on the excess. Then there’s Greece, which has had to limit withdrawals from automated teller machines to 60 euros a day because of a severe cash crunch.

Consider the case of Apple, with an enormous cash pile that earns next to nothing. The company had about $160 billion in March 2014 and made $1.795 billion in interest and dividend income that year–which is less than 1 percent, considering that the company’s kept increasing the cash holding. And there are companies, even entire countries, that would kill to be financed at that rate–but are forced to accept much higher ones, and not necessarily because they are unsafe borrowers, but because they are often dragged down by risk perceptions that have little to do with reality.

Before the 2008 financial crisis, financial globalization–defined as international capital inflows–was on the rise, partly because investors underestimated risk. After the mortgage crash, it became clear that rating agencies weren’t much help to investors in making such estimates and that local and specialized knowledge was needed to make intelligent decisions. The European debt crisis only confirmed this.

The fiscal regimes, political and macroeconomic risks of countries vary so much that mistakes happen, even when a foreign investor can afford detailed and knowledgeable analysis. The bond guru Michael Hasenstab’s investment in Ukrainian bonds for Franklin Templeton is a case in point: The trade was thoroughly analyzed and Hasenstab traveled to Kiev last year to talk to officials and executives, but the country now wants him to accept a 40 percent haircut as part of its International Monetary Fund-led bailout.

To ensure that financial resources are distributed more evenly throughout the world, it would make sense to cut down country-specific risk. Taking monetary policy out of individual countries’ hands would go a long way toward that goal. Currency risk would be eliminated–the same monetary unit would be in use everywhere–and there would be a uniform interest rate environment. The creditworthiness of specific borrowers would be investors’ biggest area of concern. That’s still a big unknown, and there would always be enough coups, revolutions, corruption, fraud and mismanagement to throw the best models off kilter. Yet there would be much less to worry about.

Now, the world’s 140 or so currencies sometimes make cross-border flows dangerous. Switzerland and Denmark have both suffered from their commitment to their own currencies this year. The ability to devalue is nice, but it’s illusory, to a large extent: It helps balance a budget, bring down debt levels and make exports more competitive, but it hits ordinary people with high inflation. Besides, according to a 2010 paper by Stephen Kamin, director of international finance at the Federal Reserve System, by giving up the right to print their own money, governments stand to lose less and less. And they might even need the discipline imposed by an outside monetary policy authority.

If the world used the same currency, the problems inadvertently caused by the euro wouldn’t be replicated. German banks were too willing to lend to projects in the European periphery because they felt they could trust members of the same exclusive currency club and because the euro made investing in Europe almost frictionless, an advantage the rest of the world didn’t have. The one world, one currency club would make friction disappear.

Of course, there would be the question of who should administer the global central bank. The U.S. would want to–the dollar is as close to a global currency as we have–but resistance from other global players would sink the project. This is where something like Bitcoin could come in handy: a decentralized system that works with little human intervention. “Mining” rules could be established to prevent anyone from cornering the market, but the system would self-regulate.

This is naive utopianism, of course. The obstacles to such a project are beyond estimation, as so is the technical complexity. But this pipe-dream is a reminder of how tough and complex the euro project is. Those who hasten to write it off as a failure don’t show it enough respect. Sure, there have been setbacks, and some countries may prove unable to keep taking part, but its participants are accumulating data that may one day allow us to figure out how to bring the whole world closer together.

Wanted in College Graduates: Tolerance for Ambiguity

Jeff Selingo, LinkedIn Pulse, June 29, 2015

Three months after I graduated from college and following a summer journalism fellowship at the Arizona Republic in Phoenix, I had my first interview for a full-time newspaper reporting job. It was in Wilmington, N.C. The managing editor of the newspaper picked me up at the airport and after a quick lunch, he dropped me off on Front Street, the historic main thoroughfare along the banks of the Cape Fear River. He told me to go find a story.

It was a Friday afternoon in late August and I had to report and write the story by 5 p.m. I had never been to Wilmington before and I didn’t know anyone else in town. I didn’t have a car. All I had was the notepad and pen the editor kindly gave me. For the next several hours, I roamed the streets talking to business owners, local residents, and tourists. I eventually found a story–about a tourism campaign the state was undertaking after a close call with a hurricane–and filed it on time.

But as the editor later told me, the article itself was not the test. It was my reaction when he dropped me off: he wanted to see what I would do in an unfamiliar situation. Other job candidates, he said, either panicked and asked for a specific assignment or they figured out how to get the job done. He wanted employees who could cope with the unknown on a daily basis.

As artificial intelligence increasingly makes many jobs obsolete, success in the future will belong to those able to tolerate ambiguity in their work. Too many recent graduates, however, approach their job descriptions the way they did a syllabus in college–as a recipe for winning in a career. They want concrete, well-defined tasks, as if they were preparing for an exam in college. “Excelling at any job is about doing the things you weren’t asked to do,” said Mary Egan, founder of Gathered Table, a Seattle-based start-up and former senior vice president for strategy and corporate development at Starbucks. “This generation is not as comfortable with figuring out what to do.”

Like many of the other 21st Century skills sought by employers, a tolerance for ambiguity is often developed early in life. The feedback children get from adults and teachers have an enormous impact on their ability to deal with uncertainty.

Carol Dweck, a Stanford University psychologist, has found that praising children for their intelligence, rather than for their effort, often leads them to give up when they the encounter the unknown. It’s much better in her opinion to compliment children for their persistence. People perform better when they can focus on things they can control rather than things they cannot.

Dweck has conducted several studies over the years that found people would do better if they thought of their intelligence as flexible and not something fixed at birth. People with what she calls a “growth mind-set” see challenges as opportunities to broaden their skills. But people who have been constantly praised for their intelligence freeze in ambiguous situations when they don’t know the answer and often tie themselves in knots trying to reach perfection.

The ability to tolerate ambiguity on the job requires people to think contextually, what I call the “connective tissue” that occupies the space in-between ideas. It is the “killer app” of today’s workplaces. We make these connections by following our curiosity and exploring and learning from peers.

Knowledge is not just what is in our brains, but is distributed throughout our networks. Learning happens by building and navigating those networks. But these networks are not just virtual–places such as Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, or LinkedIn. Some of the best connections between knowledge occur in face-to-face conversations.

When I interviewed for that reporting job in North Carolina twenty years ago, I had no clue how much journalism would evolve over the coming decades. Even so, the set of skills journalism provided me–particularly, the initiative to find a story every day, the ability to recognize patterns and trends, and to synthesize disparate ideas–remain invaluable no matter what I do. You don’t need to major in journalism or become a reporter, of course, to acquire those set of skills, but they are crucial to navigating a future workplace marked with so much uncertainty.

Friday, July 3, 2015

Escolha Ser Positivo


Link
Uma compilação

Quando você muda a sua perspectiva, as coisas mudam.—Max Planck

*

Muitos anos atrás, cuidei de um senhor com Alzheimer.

Por mais de seis meses eu o alimentava, dava banho, vestia, fazia companhia, limpava o seu bumbum e o levava para caminhar. Eu também suportava os seus ímpetos, como, por exemplo, quando ele tentou me bater o caminho todo de volta à casa e depois me impediu de entrar e ficou rindo feito um louco (Claro! Rsrsrs.)

Eu comecei a cuidar dele porque gostei de sua esposa logo na primeira entrevista. Eu gostei muito dela como pessoa. Suas olheiras mostravam o cansaço extremo por ter que cuidar dele 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana. Mas puxa, quanto amor por aquele homem. Ela olhava para ele com tanta ternura! Ele nem a reconhecia, no entanto ela permanecia inabalável. Eu queria ajudá-la, por isso entrei no time.

Aprendi muito nesse período. Eu estava tão sensível que nem suportava contato físico. Mas às vezes, aquele senhor idoso só se acalmava quando alguém segurava suas mãos. Eu tinha que segurar sua mão e me retirar e encontrar um ponto de quietude no meu íntimo para energizá-lo. Só então ele sossegava.

Eu o observava passar horas olhando para fora da janela. Ele via coisas que eu não via, e eu ficava curiosa. Será que seus óculos eram mágicos e lhe permitiam ver outros mundos?

Seria possível dizer que ele sofria, mas nunca saberei ao certo, e não acho que seja o caso. Ele vivia com a cabeça em outro lugar, mas parecia feliz e saudável a maior parte do tempo.

As pessoas que realmente sofrem com esse tipo de situação são os membros da família. Os seus muitos filhos e sua esposa, uma pessoa bastante animada. Mas sofrer era uma decisão que cabia a eles, e preferiram não sofrer. Optaram por incluir o mal de Alzheimer como um fator a mais na equação de suas vidas pelo meio do qual pudessem aprender e crescer em família. Eles ficaram muito mais unidos. Viram que precisavam pedir ajuda na hora da necessidade (nesse caso estou incluída), e criar uma rede de puro amor para amparar esse homem que era tão importante na vida de todos eles.

O mal de Alzheimer foi uma tragédia, pois retirou este homem, em vida, do seio familiar. Foi uma dádiva no sentido que lhes deu a oportunidade de crescer em espírito e como família, de uma maneira que não teria acontecido de outra forma. Eram todas pessoas adoráveis.



A minha filha tem um cromossomo a mais [síndrome de Down]. Muitas pessoas gostam de dizer que ela sofre com uma doença. Não acredito que seja isso, pois não é o que ela transparece. Mas vai saber, né?

Gosto de pensar que ela é uma dissidente que desejava vivenciar o mundo de uma perspectiva diferente. Gosto de pensar que ela me empurra na direção de entender o amor incondicional. Essa menininha jamais se encaixará em uma caixa, qualquer que seja. A natureza da síndrome de Down torna o futuro um incógnito.

Preciso amá-la como ela é, neste exato momento, e no future, como quer que ele se desenrole, e aconteça o que acontecer.

Considero isso uma lição digna de ser aprendida.—Meriah[1]

*

Uma atitude de louvor ou gratidão em situações difíceis atrai o Espírito e o poder do Senhor na situação. Eleva o nosso espírito e o das pessoas ao nosso redor, pois nos ajuda a ter uma perspectiva positiva. Dá-nos fé – fé no Senhor e fé diante de circunstâncias negativas, e a fé é a vitória. Sem dúvida a fé muda a situação, mas em situações ruins muitas vezes é difícil ter fé para orar, pois nossa reação natural é se entristecer, ficar perturbado ou desanimar. Por isso o louvor é o contra-ataque a essas coisas negativas. Ele domina o nosso espírito e reação às circunstâncias, dando-nos fé, confiança no Senhor e uma energia espiritual positiva.—Maria Fontaine[2]

*

Nós sempre enfrentaremos dificuldades nesta vida. As circunstâncias nunca serão perfeitas aqui na terra, enquanto estivermos na vida física. Por isso, às vezes, somos tentados a temer e nos preocupar. Mas a maneira de superar tudo isso é olhando para Mim, concentrando-se na luz.

Concentrar-se na luz é deixar de olhar para as poças de lama dos desapontamentos, temores ou situações difíceis, e olhar para o chafariz de águas borbulhantes que é a Minha perspectiva positiva. Em vez de fazer caretas por causa da lama, venha admirar o meu espetacular chafariz. Pode contemplar as lindas cores se movimentando nas águas refrescantes, juntar as mãos e matar a sua sede. Pode tirar os sapatos e pular na água borbulhante, jogar água pra cá e pra lá, e beber à vontade.

Mantenha os olhos em Mim, lembrando-se que Eu estou no controle. Absorva as Minhas promessas por meio da leitura e meditação. Brinque alegremente na água na Minha presença, Me louvando apesar do que acontece ao seu redor. Isso é concentrar-se na luz! Jesus fala em profecia[3]

*

Tudo tem o seu lado positivo. Toda pessoa e toda situação tem algo de bom, e a maior parte do tempo não é muito óbvio. É preciso procurar, e às vezes procurar com bastante atenção. O meu velho eu estava satisfeito em se recostar e observar ao meu redor. Se eu via algo negativo, seguia meus sentimentos. Não queria procurar ou pensar muito no positivo. Era muito mais fácil relaxar e apenas aceitar o que via (geralmente o lado negativo e ruim).

Agora, quando estou diante de uma situação difícil ou de um desafio, eu penso: “O que isso tem de bom?” Por mais terrível que seja a situação, sempre posso encontrar algo de bom se parar para pensar a respeito. Tudo tem seu lado bom e ruim, e nos oferece aprendizado. Então, no mínimo, podemos aprender com as experiências ruins; mas geralmente não para por aí. Se observarmos com atenção, geralmente descobriremos algo bom e positivo sobre toda pessoa ou situação.—Dani[4]

*

A maior descoberta da minha geração é que o ser humano pode alterar sua vida se mudar suas atitudes. —William James

*

Escolher uma atitude positiva é um processo. Não é algo que se faz apenas uma vez e conta que tudo vai ser perfeito a partir daquele momento. Ainda sofreremos reveses, demoras, acidentes, frustrações, argumentos, fadiga, e medo. O segredo é a maneira como reagimos a tudo isso. Queremos deixar as situações arruinarem nosso dia, ou preferimos encarar o futuro com esperança? Temos o poder de escolher…

Ao optarmos por uma atitude positiva cada dia, na verdade estamos atraindo mais experiências positivas, e reduzindo a possibilidade de termos experiências negativas. Você talvez tenha reparado que cada experiência muitas vezes determina a qualidade da experiência seguinte, causando uma reação em cadeia em nossas vidas. Se uma coisinha der errado, pode desencadear uma série de problemas no resto do dia. Nesse contexto, é fácil perceber a força de uma atitude positiva. Em vez de deixar pequenas coisas arruinarem o nosso dia, deveríamos ignorá-las e seguir adiante sem nos deixarmos afetar.—Autor anônimo[5]

*

O coração alegre serve de bom remédio.—Provérbios 17:22[6]

Publicado no Âncora em julho de 2013. Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli.


[1] www.mamapedia.com/voices/the-choice-to-suffer.

[2] Publicado originalmente em fevereiro de 2007.

[3] Publicado originalmente em agosto de 2008.

[4] www.positivelypresent.com/2010/03/train-yourself-to-be-positive.html.

[5] http://www.wingsfortheheart.com/consciously-choosing-a-positive-attitude.htm.

[6] NVI.

To Be a Great Leader, You Absolutely Must Be a Reader

By Rick Warren

If you’ve ever been to Israel, you know there’s a real contrast between the Sea of Galilee and the Dead Sea. The Sea of Galilee is full of water and full of life. There are trees and vegetation. They still do commercial fishing there. But the Dead Sea is just that—dead. There are no fish in it and no life around it. The Sea of Galilee is at the top of Israel and receives waters from the mountains of Lebanon. They all come into the top of it and then it gives out at the bottom. That water flows down through the Jordan River and enters into the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea takes in but it never gives out. That’s why it’s stagnant. The point is, there must be a balance in our lives to stay fresh with both input and output. There’s got to be an inflow and an outflow.

Somebody has said, “When your output exceeds your income, your upkeep will be your downfall.” There must be a balance. Most Christians get too much input and not enough output. They attend Bible study after Bible study. They’re always taking in but they’re never doing any ministry. The problem we pastors and church leaders face is the opposite. You’re always giving out, and if you don’t get input, you’ll dry up.

Paul wrote his second letter to Timothy in prison. At the end of the letter he tells Timothy, “When you come, bring my coat, bring the books, too, and especially the ones made of parchment” (2 Timothy 4:13). At the end of his life, while in prison, Paul wants two things… “I want my coat and I want my books.” C. H. Spurgeon commenting on this passage says:

He is inspired, yet he wants books. He has been preaching at least thirty years, yet he wants books. He’s seen the Lord, yet he wants books. He’s had a wider experience than most men, yet he wants books. He’s been caught up to heaven and has heard things that are unlawful to utter, yet he wants books. He’s written a major part of the New Testament, yet he wants books.

Oswald Sanders in his book Spiritual Leadership says: “The man [and woman] who desires to grow spiritually and intellectually will be constantly at his books.” I remember reading the biographies of both John Wesley and Jonathan Edwards. Both of them were intellectual giants. They stayed fresh by having a book continually while they were on horseback riding from event to event. Everywhere they traveled, they had a book. I’ve seen drawings of Wesley with a book in one hand, reading, not even looking where his horse is going.

Leaders are readers. Every leader is a reader. Not all readers are leaders but all leaders are readers. A lot of people read, but they’re not leaders. If you’re going to lead, you’ve got to be thinking further in advance than the people that you’re leading. There are at least four reasons reading is essential.

1. You must read for inspiration and motivation.

Harold Ockenga said, “Read to refill the wells of inspiration.” William Long, who wrote Christian Perfection and a number of Christian classics, wrote “Reading on wise and virtuous subjects is, next to prayer, the best improvement of our hearts. It enlightens us, calms us, collects us, collects our thoughts, prompts us to better efforts. We say a man is known by the friends he keeps, but a man is known even better by his books.” Personally, I feel few things get me out of sluggishness more than reading a good book. It gets my creative juices flowing. So the first thing I do is read for inspiration.

2. You must read to sharpen your skills.

Aldous Huxley said, “Every man who knows how to read has in his power to magnify himself, to multiply the way in which he exists, to make his life full, significant and interesting.” Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body. Your mind is a muscle, and just like any muscle, the more you exercise it, the stronger it gets. You cannot wear out your mind. No one ever died of an overused mind.

Just like every other professional, you as a minister have to continually be upgrading your skills. The way you do that is through reading. Make a list of the skills that are needed for your facet of ministry and then read in those areas.

3. You must read to learn from others.

It’s wise to learn from experience but it’s even wiser to learn from the experience of others. All of us learn from the school of hard knocks—trial and error. But we don’t have time to make all the mistakes ourselves. Socrates said, “Employ your time in improving yourselves by other men’s documents, so you shall come easily by what others have labored hard for.” Employ your time reading what other men have already learned and then you can learn much easier what others have labored hard for.

The fact is, you can learn from anybody. You don’t have to agree with everything they do, but everybody has something to teach you. We have assimilated lots of good ideas from many different sources and put them together in a new format, and that’s what creativity is. All truth has been around forever. There are no truly new ideas. Creativity is taking existing ideas and making them work in a new way.

4. You must read to stay current in a changing world.

If books are any indication of personal growth of senior pastors, a lot of pastors in America stopped thinking when they got out of school. They’re not reading anything new, yet they’re trying to speak on a weekly basis. In today’s society, obsolescence comes very quickly. You can write a science textbook and by the time it gets to press, it’s out of date. You cannot live out your entire ministry on what you learned in seminary. You have to keep growing and keep learning.

With that as a background, I want to share with you some tips about how to get more out of your reading:
Analyze your reading habits to see what you’ve read and what you really need to read next.
Be intentional about scheduling time for reading, then read snippets of books wherever you are.
Balance your reading. Read broadly. Include people you don’t agree with. This is how we are stretched.
Mark up your books and take notes. If you use a reading app, make highlights and store them.
Know what not to read. Know your favorite authors, read the covers and tables of contents and the bibliographies to see if the book is worth your time.
Read book reviews and book summaries to process even more books in less time.
Build your library. Whether you prefer print or e-books, collect a library to reference and to leave behind.

And above all, remember that the Bible is our number-one priority in reading. You can get so caught up in reading other books that you don’t read the Bible. Make time for God’s Word before reading anything else. It is a lamp to our feet and a light to our path. We need to spend more time reading it than anything else.

If you want to be a growing leader of a healthy movement, keep reading. It’s the only way to stay out front.

http://pastors.com/great-leader-absolutely-must-reader

Short of Cash, U.N. Cuts Syria Refugees’ Rations Again

Reuters, July 1, 2015

GENEVA–The World Food Programme, running short of cash, will halve the value of food vouchers given to Syrian refugees in Lebanon this month and may cut all help for 440,000 Syrians in Jordan next month, the U.N. agency said on Wednesday.

“Just when we thought things couldn’t get worse, we are forced yet again to make yet more cuts,” Muhannad Hadi, WFP’s Regional Director for the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia and Eastern Europe, said in a statement. “Refugees were already struggling to cope with what little we could provide.”

United Nations aid agencies said last week that a $4.5 billion appeal to tackle the Syrian refugee crisis in 2015 was less than a quarter funded, putting millions of vulnerable people at risk, and had already led to cuts in vital assistance.

The shortfall has meant 1.6 million refugees have had food assistance cut this year and 750,000 children are not attending school, the agencies and partner organizations said, calling on countries to deliver on their pledges.

WFP said Syrian refugees in Lebanon would now get $13.50 to spend on food in the month of July. The organization needs $139 million to keep helping almost 4 million Syrian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Iraq and Turkey until September.

WFP said its global contributions rose by 27 percent in 2014, but the unprecedented number of humanitarian emergencies–including Syria, Iraq, South Sudan and the West African countries hit by Ebola–meant its needs were rising even faster, and continued to outpace available funding.

Syria’s conflict is now in its fifth year and has killed more than 220,000 people and displaced around half of the population. U.N. aid agencies have described it as one of the worst refugee crises since World War Two.

The United Nations predicts there will be 4.27 million Syrian refugees in the region by the end of 2015. U.N. funds also aim to help more than 20 million local people in communities hosting refugees in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt.

Drug cops took a college kid’s savings and now 13 police departments want a cut

By Christopher Ingraham, Washington Post, June 30, 2015

In February 2014, Drug Enforcement Administration task force officers at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport seized $11,000 in cash from 24-year-old college student Charles Clarke. They didn’t find any guns, drugs or contraband on him. But, according to an affidavit filled out by one of the agents, the task force officers reasoned that the cash was the proceeds of drug trafficking, because Clarke was traveling on a recently-purchased one-way ticket, he was unable to provide documentation for where the money came from, and his checked baggage had an odor of marijuana. (He was a marijuana smoker.)

Clarke’s cash, which says he he spent five years saving up, was seized under civil asset forfeiture, where cops are able to take cash and property from people who are never convicted of–and in some cases, never even charged with–a crime. The DEA maintains that asset forfeiture is an important crime-fighting tool.

But the practice has become contentious, in part because agencies are generally allowed to keep a share of the cash and property they seize. In cases like Clarke’s, where local and federal agents cooperate on a seizure, federal agencies typically keep at least 20 percent of the assets, while local cops split the remainder among themselves. Critics argue that this creates a profit motive and leads to “policing for profit.”

Two local agencies were involved in the seizure of Clarke’s cash: the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport Police, and the Covington Police Department, which is the home office of the DEA task force officer who detained and spoke with Clarke. But according to the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit civil liberties group now representing Clarke in court, 11 additional law enforcement agencies–who were not involved in Clarke’s case at all–have also requested a share of Clarke’s cash under the federal asset forfeiture program. They include the Kentucky State Police, the Ohio Highway Patrol, and even the Bureau of Criminal Investigations within the Ohio Attorney General’s office.

These numbers all come from an Institute for Justice review of the Justice Department’s Consolidated Asset Tracking System, the federal asset forfeiture database. The airport police have requested the lion’s share of Charles Clarke’s $11,000, at 40 percent. The Cincinnati Police Dept. has requested an additional 6.14 percent of it, with the rest of the agencies requesting 3.07 percent each. That all adds up to just under 80 percent, which by law is the maximum amount local agencies are allowed to receive in cases like this.

The practice of civil asset forfeiture has drawn increasing scrutiny from lawmakers. Just recently, three Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter to the acting head of the Drug Enforcement Administration expressing concern over a recent forfeiture case involving a young man, Joseph Rivers, who had $16,000 seized at an Amtrak stop in New Mexico. The letter describes the circumstances of the seizure as “disturbing,” particularly Rivers’ contention that he was racially profiled as the only black person on that part of the train.

Like Joseph Rivers, Charles Clarke is a young black man. And like Rivers, he lost his cash at a so-called “cold consent” encounter–that is, a warrantless search voluntarily agreed to–at one of the nation’s transportation hubs. Clarke didn’t have any marijuana on him or in his baggage, so he hasn’t been charged with any drug crimes. He was charged with resisting arrest and assaulting an officer, however, after he tried to prevent the agents from seizing his money by yelling at them and struggling with the agents when they grabbed the cash, according to the agent’s affidavit. The charges were subsequently dropped, according to his lawyers at the Institute for Justice.

So why are 11 agencies that were not involved with the forfeiture of Clarke’s cash requesting a cut of it? The most likely reason, according to Darpana Sheth, the lead attorney representing Charles Clarke, is that they all participate in the same DEA drug task force that’s home to the officer who made the seizure.

“Law enforcement agencies are just scrambling to get a cut of the money and it has nothing to do with legitimate law enforcement incentives,” said Clarke’s attorney Darpana Sheth. “It’s more about policing for profit.” The small amounts that most agencies requested–just a few hundred dollars–represent what Sheth calls the “pettiness” of much of civil asset forfeiture. “It’s really just the money, it’s not anything else that’s driving the request,” she said.

And over time, these payouts can add up. The Institute for Justice provided numbers from their analysis of Department of Justice forfeiture data on the cash value of seizures at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG) from 2000 to 2013. Those number show seizure amounts spiking sharply in recent years, even as overall passenger volume has dropped precipitously.

According to the Federal Aviation Administration, passenger departures at CVG have dropped by about 75 percent since 2005, from a high of roughly 11 million down to fewer than 3 million in 2013. Over the same time, the total amount of cash seized at the airport has increased more than sixteen-fold, from $147,000 to $3 million in 2012. So in stepping up their seizure efforts, authorities at the airport are squeezing more cash out of fewer passengers.

In some ways, this increase mirrors the overall rise in asset forfeitures seen around the country in recent years. And it’s worth reiterating that this is all above-board and perfectly legal. But for critics, that’s precisely the problem. And their efforts are starting to bear fruit: Congress has been holding hearings on the issue. Senator Rand Paul has introduced legislation that would remove some of the profit motive from asset forfeiture practices.

But until such reforms pass, people like Charles Clarke will have to work within the current forfeiture system, which allows law enforcement officers to seize property first under the presumption of guilt. The title of the federal government’s lawsuit perfectly encapsulates the odd situation that forfeiture defendants find themselves in: “United States of America v. $11,000 in United States Currency and Charles L. Clarke, II.”

Thursday, July 2, 2015

The Sovereign Man

Notes from the Field
Singapore

Yesterday over coffee, a friend of mine leaked the news that JP Morgan’s private banking division here in Singapore is going to start charging negative interest rates.

I almost fell out of my chair.

He’s a successful hedge fund manager and one of their best customers. So when he received the notice, he rang up his private banker and demanded to know why.

Between ridiculously low interest rates (banks are closing loans here for 0.9% or lower) and the increasing costs of compliance, “we can’t make money anymore...” was the response.

It certainly paints a clear picture of how screwed up the entire financial system is.

Compliance is a major component in this. Bankers around the world are buried up to their eyeballs in paperwork and regulations now.

They can’t make a move or approve a single transaction without first doing anti-money laundering, terrorist financing, and tax evasion due diligence.

Imagine it like this: your banker rings you up tomorrow and says,

“The government of China requires us to have all of our depositors fill out this paperwork. So I need you to send this form back to me ASAP…”

You’d probably think it was a joke.

Or at a minimum think, “Wait, what? I’m not Chinese. You’re not a Chinese bank. Who cares about some stupid Chinese regulation?”

And you’d be right.

Except that’s precisely what the United States is doing right now.

All over the world, bankers are contacting their customers and forcing them to fill out paperwork to comply with idiotic US government regulations. Even when there’s no connection to the US.

Here in Singapore, the bankers are completely miserable about it.

They’re so angry for having to call customers and say, “Yes I know you’re in India, and I know we’re in Singapore, and I know you’ve been a customer for 10 years. But you still have to fill out this US government form or else we’ll close your account.”

It’s ridiculous-- all of this because the US government is bankrupt.

A few years ago they passed the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)-- a major part of their crusade to stamp out tax evasion and bring in more tax revenue.

FATCA is now in full force. Banks all over the world have been forced to enter into information sharing agreements with the IRS, meaning that they have to report on all of their customers and force them to fill out meaningless forms.

Needless to say, this costs a lot of money.

If you own a business, you can just imagine how frustrating and expensive it would be to have your employees toil away on senseless paperwork instead of... you know, doing real business.

The US government tells us that all of these disclosure programs have brought in about $6.5 billion in tax revenue.

Yet the costs of compliance are estimated to cost at least $8 billion, with some estimates over 10x higher.

Now that’s a neat trick. Uncle Sam gets the money and passes off the costs to everyone else.

And those who don’t comply with America’s rules are destroyed.

The most blatant example of this was last year, when a French bank was fined $9 billion for doing business with countries that Uncle Sam didn’t like.

Bear in mind, this was a French bank, not an American bank.

They violated no French laws. Yet they had to pay the US government $9 billion for doing business with places like Cuba.

(Ironically, Cuba is now BFFs with the United States, but it’s not like the bank is going to get a refund.)

More recently, the US government destroyed an Andorran bank that was accused of weak anti-money laundering controls.

And a few years ago they took down the oldest private bank in Switzerland.

Every bank in the world has seen these incidents, and they’re scared. They could be next.

And that’s why you can’t get a single financial transaction done anymore without first submitting a mountain of paperwork to prove that you’re not a terrorist. Or financing terrorists. Or laundering money. Or doing business with the Axis of Evil.

Even outside of banking it has become utterly ridiculous.

A friend of mine here runs one of the largest bullion depositories in Singapore; he wanted to buy some raw gold and have it made into bars, so he contacted a refiner.

The refiner said, “Sure no problem. I just need you to send us some compliance documentation before we get started.”

Then he sent a list of no fewer than 22 items that he needed to submit-- copies of licenses, passports, certificates, etc.

22 items. Just to have a refiner make some gold bars. Ridiculous.

So obviously they’re not going to waste their time. Which means there’s some business that could have been done, but won’t, simply because of the compliance costs.

The US government has really screwed the world on this. Paperwork is the priority. Not business.

And all because America is bankrupt.

This trip to Singapore has been very eye-opening for me as I’m just now starting to understand how much people within the financial system despise the US government.

They feel like they’re being forced at gunpoint to be volunteer spies and tax collectors, simply because US politicians have been financially irresponsible.

And to me, it’s the biggest sign yet that America’s financial dominance is coming to an end. They’ve essentially engineered it themselves by alienating the whole world.

The transition isn’t going to be smooth. And it won’t happen overnight. But there will come a time, and likely soon, when the United States gets displaced.

And the rest of the world can hardly wait.
Until tomorrow,

Simon Black
Founder, SovereignMan.com

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith