Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Monday, September 7, 2015

Image of Drowned Syrian, Aylan Kurdi, 3, Brings Migrant Crisis Into Focus

By Anne Barnard and Karam Shoumali, NY Times, Sept. 3, 2015

ISTANBUL–The smugglers had promised Abdullah Kurdi a motorboat for the trip from Turkey to Greece, a step on the way to a new life in Canada. Instead, they showed up with a 15-foot rubber raft that flipped in high waves, dumping Mr. Kurdi, his wife and their two small sons into the sea.

Mr. Kurdi tried to keep the boys, Aylan and Ghalib, afloat, but one died as he pushed the other to his wife, Rehan, pleading, “Just keep his head above the water!”

Only Mr. Kurdi, 40, survived.

“Now I don’t want anything,” he said a day later, on Thursday, from Mugla, Turkey, after filling out forms at a morgue to claim the bodies of his family. “Even if you give me all the countries in the world, I don’t want them. What was precious is gone.”

It is an image of his youngest son, a lifeless child in a red shirt and dark shorts face down on a Turkish beach, that appears to have galvanized public attention to a crisis that has been building for years. Once again, it is not the sheer size of the catastrophe–millions upon millions forced by war and desperation to leave their homes–but a single tragedy that has clarified the moment. It was 3-year-old Aylan, his round cheek pressed to the sand as if he were sleeping, except for the waves lapping his face.

Rocketing across the world on social media, the photograph has forced Western nations to confront the consequence of a collective failure to help migrants fleeing the Middle East and Africa to Europe in search of hope, opportunity and safety. Aylan, perhaps more even than the anonymous, decomposing corpses found in the back of a truck in Austria that shocked Europe last week, has personalized the tragedy facing the 11 million Syrians displaced by more than four years of war.

The case of this young boy’s doomed journey has landed as a political bombshell across the Middle East and Europe, and even countries as far away as Canada, which has up to now not been a prominent player in the Syria crisis. Canadian officials were under intense pressure to explain why the Kurdi family was unable to get permission to immigrate legally, despite having relatives there who were willing to support and employ them. So far, the government has only cited incomplete documents, an explanation that has done little to quiet the outrage at home and abroad.

Mr. Kurdi, a Syrian Kurdish barber, and his brother Mohammad wanted to immigrate under the sponsorship of their sister, Tima Kurdi, 43, who lives in a suburb of Vancouver, British Columbia. She had invited Mr. Kurdi to live in her basement with his family and work in her hair salon.

“They can work with me, doing hair, I can find them a job, and then when they are financially O.K., they can move out and be their own,” she said by phone on Thursday.

Mr. Kurdi, too, said his sister had told Canadian authorities that she would be “responsible for our expenses,” but that “they didn’t agree.”

In fact, Ms. Kurdi said, she had applied at first only for Mohammad’s family, teaming up with friends and relatives to make bank deposits to prove she could support the family.

But in June, she said, Mohammad’s application was rejected for lack of a required document proving he had refugee status. But under Turkish refugee policies, such documents are nearly impossible for Syrians to come by. In any case, the experience persuaded the family that neither brother would ever get a Canadian visa.

That, Ms. Kurdi said, was when she offered to help her brothers finance the boat trip–something, she said through tears, “I really regret.”

Now, she said, “All what I really need is to stop the war. That’s all. I think the whole world has to step in and help those Syrian people. They are human beings.”

Aylan was named after a cousin, Ms. Kurdi’s son Alan, she said. She had never met Aylan or his brother Ghalib, 5, but saw and talked to them often on video chat. Aylan’s father grew up in Damascus, the Syrian capital, in the neighborhood of Rukineddine, but was originally from the Kurdish city of Kobani near the Turkish border. A year or so ago, he said in a telephone interview, he moved his family to Kobani because of increasing strains in Damascus. But he said it was not safe there either, with the Islamic State increasingly attacking the area.

The family eventually moved to Istanbul, but it was difficult for Mr. Kurdi to support himself, and he had to borrow money from his sister for rent.

Ms. Kurdi turned to her local member of Parliament, Fin Donnelly, who hand-delivered a letter appealing for help to Chris Alexander, the citizenship and immigration minister.

“We waited and waited, and we didn’t have any action,” he said.

In Canada, a country that has long prided itself on openness to refugees but has shifted that policy under a conservative government, this amounts to a campaign issue; Mr. Alexander had promised to admit 10,000 refugees from Syria, just over 1,000 had arrived by late August, and opposition parties like Mr. Donnelly’s say more should be welcomed. On Thursday, Mr. Alexander rushed back from the campaign trail to Ottawa, the capital, to deal with the family’s case, declaring that it “broke hearts around the world.”

Mr. Kurdi said he tried several times to cross to Europe on his own. He almost drowned trying to cross the river at Edirne, in Turkey, he said, “and once from the borders with Bulgaria and I got caught and sent back.”

Then he paid 4,000 euros, about $4,450, for the sea crossing–paying extra supposedly to avoid using a rubber raft.

“Of course we were afraid of drowning,” he said, “but the Turkish smuggler said it was going to be a yacht.”

Mr. Kurdi said the family had life jackets that were lost in the accident.

The voyage started in the middle of the night, around 3 a.m. in five-foot seas, he said. It is the season of the relentless Meltemi winds, when the waves can be 15 feet high.

Choking back emotion as he spoke, Mr. Kurdi described how he had flailed about while trying to find his children as his wife held on to the capsized boat.

“I started pushing them up to the surface so they could breathe,” he said. “I had to shift from one to another. I think we were in the water for three hours trying to survive.”

He watched helplessly as one exhausted child drowned, spitting up a white liquid, he said, then pushed the other toward the mother, “so he could at least keep his head up.”

Mr. Kurdi then apologized, saying he could no longer speak, and ended the conversation with one parting message.

“What I really want now is for the smuggling to stop, and to find a solution for those people who are paying the blood of their hearts just to leave,” he said.

“Yesterday I went to one of the smuggling points and told people trying to get smuggled at least not to take their kids on these boats. I told them my story, and some of them changed their minds.”

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Why They Hate Us


By Fred Reed, September 4, 2015

A frequent theme nowadays is “Why do they hate us?” meaning why does so much of the world detest the United States. The reasons given are usually absurd: They hate our freedom or democracy. They hate us for our cultural superiority. They hate us because we are wonderful.

No. Actually the reason is simple if unpalatable. They hate us because we meddle, and have meddled. They hate us because we are the most murderous nation on the planet. They hate our insufferable smugness.

People remember slights. They may not remember them as they actually happened, but they remember them. The Civil War ended in 1865, the Federal occupation in 1877. Yet today many Southerners are still bitter, to the point that their emotional loyalty is to the South, not to Washington.

Silly? Yes, if you are from the North. Grievances matter more to those aggrieved than to the aggrievers.

In Guadalajara, near my home in Mexico, a towering monument in a traffic circle honors Los Niños Héroes, the Heroic Children. These are the little boys who, when the invading American armies attacked Chapultepec in 1847, went out to fight for their country. Avenues are named Niños Héroes all over Mexico. Few Americans even know that there was a war.

Wounds to national pride gall people, and endure. Exactly why, I don’t know, but it happens. Consider China. How many have heard of the Opium Wars of 1839 and 1856? Or understand that the United States and the European powers simply occupied such parts of China as they chose, forced opium sales on China, imposed extraterritoriality, and bloodily suppressed the Boxers? How many people have even heard of the Boxers?

Over a billion Chinese.

My point is not that China is morally superior to the United States. It isn’t. However, if you want to understand why so many countries loathe us, you have to understand how they see us. Whether you agree is irrelevant. Nor does it matter whether their grievances are factual. For example, many South Americans believe their countries to be poor because of exploitation by America. This isn’t true, which doesn’t matter at all.

A few years back I was in Laos and chatted with a young Lao woman. She mentioned in passing the death of her father. What happened to him, I asked? Oh, she said, he died fighting the Americans. A war that many Americans saw as a meritorious crusade against communism was, to the countries involved, an inexplicable attack that killed their fathers and brothers and children. They didn’t see why the internal affairs of their country were America’s business.

Agree with them or don’t, but that’s why they hate us.

Countries usually see their own virtues and the warts of others. Americans, perhaps because they do not much travel, carry this to an extreme and regard their country as superior to all others. The attitude is highly annoying. Consider the US from the point of view of others:

America is both a rogue state and a bully, constantly attacking countries hopelessly inferior in military strength–Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Panama, Cuba, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, etc. Civil rights? The US has more people in prison than any other country. Many of our cities are festering slums. The world saw the victims of Katrina. Morality? The country is rife with drugs, crime, sex. Culture? In education, American students are annually shown to be inferior to those of Thailand, Hungary, Singapore, and so on. America is tasteless and sordid. Look at the movies….

Yes, yes, some of that isn’t fair, and an American might ask, for example, how an Arab country, practicing female circumcision and not allowing girls to study, can lecture anyone on morality. I agree. But how they see things determines their attitudes.

In Google Images, search on “Abu Ghraib.” You will see American Army women grinning as they torture and humiliate Arab men. They are having a wonderful time, and the whole world can see those pictures. This was American policy–low-ranking girl soldiers do not undertake this kind of thing without approval from command. The general in charge was a woman. Torture is still American policy.

Stalin did this sort of thing. So did Adolf. So did Pol Pot. And so does the United States. Other countries know it. When I think how other countries react, I cringe.

Below the Rio Bravo? The first rule of American hemispheric diplomacy south of Texas should be “Don’t get into Latin faces unless you have to.” The US has a long history, of which most Americans aren’t aware, of meddling to the south. At least three invasions of Mexico depending on whether Veracruz counts as an invasion or just a bombardment), at least one of Panama, the installation of Pinochet in Chile and of support for various Central American dictators, United Fruit, the Canal Zone, the Bay of Pigs, on and on and on. These things are remembered.

A couple of examples of abjectly stupid, obnoxious meddling: First, many decades back, Mexico had a comic-book character called Memin Pinguin, a caricature black kid with exaggerated lips and so on who had adventures with white friends. In 2005, Mexico issued postage stamps with Memin’s picture, as we might of Elvis. To Mexicans it was innocent nostalgia. Yet in America outrage erupted. Jesse Jackson attacked the Mexican government and George Bush denounced the stamps as racism. People here were furious: Mexico couldn’t even issue postage stamps without approval from Washington.

Second: In 2006, some Cuban businessmen took a room in the Sheraton in Mexico City. Washington got wind of it and forced Sheraton, an American company, to eject them. Childish, pointless, it enraged Mexicans who see Cuba as yet another small country being bullied by the US, and regarded the ejection as meddling with national sovereignty. The effect of course was to fan sympathy for Cuba.

Further, we tend to see things through lenses of moralistic abstractions: Democracy is good, and freedom is good, and therefore if we bomb Iraq and kill many thousands of soldiers who are someone’s husbands, brothers, children, and fathers, the survivors will throw flowers and turn into Fifth Century Athens. It’s all right to destroy cities because we say we have good intentions.

People detest condescension. Yet we lecture Russia and China condescendingly on human rights, and speak openly of committing “regime change” in various countries as if we had a divine right to determine their form of government. It smells of armed mommyism, which no one can stand.

It is even worth reflecting that our “democracy” and “freedom” do not look as resplendent as we might think to the people of a more collective-minded and well-run country. Try Singapore. Neither democratic nor free in our sense, it is prosperous, free of crime, without a drug problem (a country that executes drug dealers has few of them), enjoys schools far better than ours; lacks graffiti, vandalism, and trash in the streets, and has a high degree of technological advancement. Its people quietly regard themselves as civilizationally superior to a degraded America in decline. (Humility is not a besetting sin of the Chinese.)

Why do we not behave more sensibly? Americans obviously are not stupid people. Dummies don’t build Mars rovers. Yet we seem to have a wanton, almost genetic non-grasp of how others think–which means that we can’t predict what they will do. Often Americans just don’t care what others think. This of course plays into the hands of Hugo Chavez and bin Laden.

That’s why they hate us. We meddle.

How One Doctor Fought a Giant Pesticide Company And Won


By Paul Steinberg, Oxford University Press, August 6, 2015

The following is an excerpt from the new book Who Rules the Earth: How Social Rules Shape Our Planet and Our Lives, by Paul Steinberg (Oxford University Press, 2015):

Faced with an endless stream of alarming news about the environment–rising temperatures and declining water supplies, population growth and species extinction, oil spills and cancer clusters–people increasingly want to know what can actually be done to address these problems. Concerned parents comb through websites late at night in search of safer products for their children. Students pack lecture halls in hundreds of environmental studies programs that have popped up on college campuses across the globe. Our grocery aisles and magazine stands are filled with advertisements promising that sustainability is just one more purchase around the corner.

The major current of environmental thinking today emphasizes the small changes we can make as individuals, which (we are told) will add up to something big. Michael Maniates, a political scientist at Allegheny College, observes that the responsibility for confronting these issues too often “falls to individuals, acting alone, usually as consumers.” Yet solutions that promote green consumerism and changes in personal lifestyles strike many of us as strangely out of proportion with enormous problems like climate change, urban air pollution, and the disappearance of tropical forests. We learn that glaciers are melting and sea levels are expected to rise due to global warming–and in response we are advised to ride a bicycle to work. Scientists tell us that one out of every five mammal species in the world is threatened with extinction, and we react by switching coffee brands. Is it any wonder that people despair that real solutions are not within their grasp?

So what more might we do to move the world onto a more sustainable path? The answer can be found in the story of a country doctor in the small Canadian town of Hudson, who decided it was time to do something extraordinary: She changed the rules.

Dr. June Irwin tended to one of her patients while, a few miles away, the votes were counted. It was May 6, 1991, and the town council of Hudson, Quebec, was considering a proposal to ban all nonessential pesticide use from homes and public spaces throughout their municipality. The move was unprecedented, but local officials had been swayed by Dr. Irwin’s relentless research on the potential dangers to children. “If down the road, science shows that we are wrong,” declared a town councilor, “then all that’s happened because of our actions is a few more dandelions. But if in fact we’re right, how many people did we save?” Ultimately the council voted in favor of the ban–a decision that would have consequences far greater than local officials could possibly have imagined.

Hudson is a picturesque community of some five thousand residents, nestled along a stretch of the Ottawa River thirty-five miles to the west of Montreal. In 1985, Dr. Irwin began showing up regularly at town council meetings, where she pleaded with her elected officials to put a stop to the practice of spraying pesticides on lawns and gardens. With a red-lipsticked smile that complements her 70-something years, June Irwin cuts quite a character. Most days she can be found tending a flock of sheep on her farm, wearing her signature sun hat and long skirt–conjuring an image of a biblical shepherd more than that of a dermatologist with a bustling private practice. Throughout the 1980s, Dr. Irwin grew increasingly concerned as her patients complained of ailments ranging from skin rashes to immune system disorders. She suspected that the culprit might be chemicals like 2,4-D that were routinely applied in home gardens and public parks to control weeds. She began her investigation by asking patients to provide tissue samples to test for pesticide residues. The results revealed that pesticides were present in the blood, hair, semen, and breast milk of the good citizens of Hudson.

Dr. Irwin’s findings were consistent with data collected in large-scale “body burden” studies run by the US Centers for Disease Control, which show that our bodies contain a complex brew of pesticides and other industrial toxins. We are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals on a daily basis, and few of these have undergone rigorous testing for health effects. Medical researchers do know, however, that many pesticides affect the brain, liver, and other organs. Children are most susceptible to these noxious effects because their growing bodies rely on internal chemical cues for the normal development of the nervous system and other vital functions.

As she pored through the medical journals, June Irwin soon reached the conclusion that it is madness to routinely expose children to poisons just to maintain the cosmetic appearance of lawns. Town council members listened patiently as she offered lengthy discourses on pesticides and health, comparing her data on local body burdens with the latest findings from the medical journals. She wrote a steady stream of letters to the local Hudson Gazette in an effort to rally the community. But four years into her one-woman campaign, there was little to show for her efforts.

This all changed in November 1989, when one of the town council members who had endured Dr. Irwin’s lectures, a local carpenter by the name of Michael Elliot, was elected mayor. Six months after his election, Mayor Elliott pushed for approval of By-law 270, banning all nonessential pesticides from homes and public spaces in the quiet little town of Hudson.

What happened next would change the North American landscape, both physically and politically. It began with an aggressive response from the pesticide companies, who moved quickly to quell Hudson’s small act of defiance. In the fall of 1993, as the town’s maples and aspens glowed bright in their full autumn color, ChemLawn and SprayTech, representing Canada’s billion-dollar lawn care industry, sued Hudson in the Quebec Superior Court, arguing that the town had no legal right to regulate pesticides. They worried that if local communities could take it upon themselves to enact environmental rules stronger than those of the Canadian provinces, things could quickly spin out of control.

At a deeper level, there were cultural norms at stake. The pesticide industry relied on the idea that a proper home lawn consists of a uniform stretch of green with no weeds whatsoever–a feat that requires applying poison to the grass. If picturesque Hudson could make do without pesticides, this would challenge the golf course aesthetic that has generated handsome profits for the industry since World War II.

“Nobody thought that we could win this–never,” explained the town clerk to documentary filmmaker Paul Tukey, who followed the story in his film A Chemical Reaction. In the courtroom, a ChemLawn representative showed up with a bottle of pesticides that he intended to drink in front of the judge in a show of confidence. Before ChemLawn’s man had a chance to ingest the poison, the judge demanded that he remove it from the courtroom and then ruled that Hudson was well within its rights in regulating pesticide use.

The publicity generated by the court case caught the attention of other communities. “If they can do it, why can’t we?” asked Merryl Hammond, founder of Citizens for Alternatives to Pesticides. The movement soon spread across Quebec, as one town after the next banned nonessential pesticides (often making exceptions, as did Hudson, for agriculture and golf courses). On the defensive now, the pesticide industry took the case to the Canadian Supreme Court. This time they didn’t attempt to drink pesticides in the courtroom, but repeated the argument that local governments have no right to decide whether chemicals are sprayed in their communities.

On June 28, 2001, in an austere gray court building surrounded by an expansive green lawn, the Canadian Supreme Court justices convened in their traditional red and white gowns and ruled 9-0 in favor of the town of Hudson. The ruling electrified reformers throughout the country. In 2009, the province of Ontario passed even stricter rules than those adopted in Quebec. “When it comes to our homes, playgrounds, schoolyards, and the like,” explained Dalton McGinty, the premier of Ontario, “we think that we have a special shared responsibility owed to the youngest generation.”

A year after the implementation of Ontario’s new rules, concentrations of common pesticides in the province’s waterways dropped by half. By 2010, three-fourths of all Canadian citizens were covered by some form of protective legislation based on the Hudson model.

Mate esse Dragão!



Link

Sejam fortes e corajosos. Não tenham medo nem fiquem apavorados por causa deles, pois o Senhor, o seu Deus, vai com vocês; nunca os deixará, nunca os abandonará.[1]

Durante a vida frequentemente surgem oportunidades e situações que podem abrir novas portas de serviço e influência. Às vezes vemos claramente que é o Senhor abrindo a porta, outras vezes apenas sentimos no nosso íntimo, ou espírito. É um sentimento que chama a nossa atenção, pois é como se o Senhor estivesse nos conduzindo em uma certa direção. Muitas vezes vem acompanhado de excitamento e expectativa positiva que nos impelem a avançar em território desconhecido.

Muitos de nós depois de anos seguindo a Deus, temos bastante experiência em sentir aonde Ele está guiando, e em consultá-lO para confirmar a Sua vontade. Por isso, talvez tenhamos certeza em relação a um novo plano e estejamos prestes a tomar uma decisão e agir. Tudo está preparado e estamos prontos para começar.

Mas o que acontece então? Por que às vezes adiamos a decisão ou evitamos dar os primeiros passos?

Muitas vezes o medo é o culpado disso. Não gosto de admitir, mas o sentimento de medo surge na minha vida de muitas formas, e pode me paralisar. Pensando bem, às vezes tenho medo de falhar, de errar, ou de que algo vai dar muito trabalho, e do que vai me custar em termos de sacrifício.

Mas não só esses temores nos travam. Às vezes, dar um outro passo envolve pedir algo, como, por exemplo, conselho de alguém, ajuda financeira, ou permissão. Nesses casos, o medo de rejeição vem à tona, e mesmo sem pararmos para analisar e identificar nossas emoções, e expressar os temores, eles são reais e nos travam. Então, o que fazer?

A Palavra de Deus diz: “No amor não há medo; pelo contrário o perfeito amor expulsa o medo, porque o medo supõe castigo. Aquele que tem medo não está aperfeiçoado no amor.”[2]

Acreditar na bondade de Deus para conosco e que Ele está nos guiando e quer nos abençoar nos coloca no caminho da superação do medo. Mas essa vitória sobre o medo não pode ocorrer apenas em nossos pensamentos, não é apenas uma questão filosófica ou espiritual. O Senhor muitas vezes espera que enfrentemos nossos temores, temos que agir e seguir na direção em que Ele guia. Obedecer passo a passo, por mais difícil que seja, derrotará o Inimigo e nos ajudará a conquistar nossos temores.

Enfrentar os seus temores neutraliza o poder deles.—Mark Burnett

David, ou fundador de tfi, disse o seguinte sobre o temor na artigo “Ataque”:

O temor é um assunto bastante interessante. Normalmente só percebemos que é subconsciente quando tentamos analisá-lo e expressá-lo em palavras. Imagino que temer falar sobre seus temores é um dos piores medos que existe, porque admiti-los é revelar o nosso íntimo, aquilo que escondemos dos outros, até dos que nos são mais queridos. Na verdade, é algo que tentamos esconder até de nós mesmos, porque temos medo de pensar no assunto. Nós nem queremos admitir que sentimos medo, porque isso seria assinar um atestado de covardia, o que não queremos fazer por medo de nos expormos.

Por isso, não só vale a pena encarar e reconhecer os temores, mas assumir uma postura positiva contra eles, principalmente no poder e Espírito do Senhor, com as promessas da Sua Palavra.[3]

Nós precisamos encarar nossos temores e superá-los para podermos seguir a vocação e plano de Deus para nossas vidas e termos a experiência plena que Ele deseja para nós. Judy Blume explicou muito bem da seguinte forma:

“Cada um de nós precisa enfrentar seus temores de frente. A maneira como lidamos com nossos medos determinará o rumo que tomaremos na vida. — Se vamos viver aventuras ou ficarmos limitados pelo medo de coisas novas.”

Esta é uma outra boa citação, de Rick Warren, sobre encarar o temor:

“O maior fracasso é deixar de tentar. Quando eu morrer quero que escrevam as seguintes palavras no meu túmulo: ‘Pelo menos ele tentou’. Para a glória de Deus nós temos que assumir riscos. É isso o que gera abundância e sucesso na vida. Não tenha medo de arriscar, porque é assim que se obtém resultados.”[4]

Existem alguns passos práticos que podemos tomar no sentido de enfrentarmos nossos temores. Mencionarei alguns, acreditando que você talvez já tenha aprendido outras táticas que funcionam no seu caso.

Digamos que escreveu um livro e procura um editor para publicá-lo. Mas decidiu que, até isso acontecer, vai visitar livrarias e bibliotecas e vender o livro você mesmo. Pega 200 exemplares e começa a falar com gerentes de livrarias e outros com autoridade para ajudá-lo. Mas então percebe que não é tão fácil assim promover o seu livro. Na verdade, é tão difícil que você não consegue convencer ninguém, e começa a pensar em desistir da ideia. Você adia. Entra e sai das livrarias e diz para si mesmo: “Não é o melhor momento; estão todos muito ocupados hoje”. No final, tira os livros do porta-malas do carro achando que talvez depois do ano letivo (verão, feriados ou férias), será uma melhor hora.

Essa mesma atitude de adiar que causa inércia pode se apresentar em diferentes situações. Outros exemplos seriam: você quer pedir um aumento no trabalho; precisa conseguir uma bolsa na faculdade; precisa abordar um colaborador para patrocinar um novo aspecto da obra missionária; convida alguém para sair; deseja que uma certa pessoa seja o seu mentor; quer mais intimidade e uma relação mais profunda com alguém; quer mais responsabilidade no local de trabalho, etc.

Se temos um sonho, ficar esperando não nos ajudará a concretizá-lo. Dizer para nós mesmos que amanhã será melhor por causa disto ou daquilo geralmente é uma desculpa. Estamos com medo, e em vez de admitir e arriscar, dando um passo na tentativa de realizar o sonho, nos convencemos a desistir e ainda justificamos nossa apatia.

Esperar até criar coragem é outra forma de procrastinar. As pessoas mais bem sucedidas agem enquanto sentem medo!—Autor desconhecido ‎

A melhor maneira de mudar a sua situação é fazer algo diferente. Você provavelmente já ouviu estes dois ditados tão conhecidos:

“Agir como sempre dará o resultado de sempre. A definição de insanidade é esperar um resultado diferente do comportamento de sempre.”

Quando sentimos um cutucão no espírito e sentimos que Deus deseja que façamos algo, temos que dar o primeiro passo. Ele não vai fazer isso no nosso lugar. Muitas vezes, quanto mais esperamos, mais nervosos ficamos.

Inatividade gera dúvida e temor; ação gera confiança e coragem. Se quer conquistar o medo, não fique parado em casa pensando. Tome uma atitude.—Dale Carnegie

Nós somos criaturas de hábitos. Nós nos acostumamos com as coisas, por isso é difícil mudar, ficamos com medo, pois temos que sair da nossa zona de conforto.

Crescimento e desenvolvimento exigem desconforto. Como um jovem esquiador disse: “Se quer aprender a esquiar de verdade, tem que se sentir confortável sentindo-se desconfortável.”

[Muitas coisas que precisamos fazer para alcançarmos nossas metas] podem ser desconfortáveis num primeiro momento. Mas não tem importância! Faça assim mesmo! Uma das maneiras de passar da fase desconfortável é simplesmente fazer aquilo que não nos sentimos à vontade fazendo.[5]

Um aspecto importante de sair da zona de conforto é começar antes de se sentir preparado. Se esperar até achar que está “pronto”… olha, sabemos que isso vai resultar em procrastinação, distração, perfeccionismo, e, infelizmente, inércia. Falando realisticamente, você talvez nunca se sinta preparado. Por isso, se conseguirmos reunir coragem suficiente para começar, mesmo sem nos sentirmos prontos, já estaremos na dianteira.

Vencedores são aquelas pessoas que têm o hábito de fazer as coisas que outros não se sentem confortáveis fazendo.—Ed Foreman

Vamos aplicar o sábio conselho de Napoleon Hill:

“Não deixe para depois. Nunca vai existir o momento exatamente certo.”

Quanto mais cedo mergulharmos e suportarmos aqueles primeiros passos desagradáveis, mais rápido passaremos da fase de medo e começaremos a nos divertir e alcançar êxito. O ciclo é previsível: Decida o que vai fazer, tenha confiança quanto à bênção de Deus no assunto, trace um plano, assuma o compromisso de realizar o plano, comece, faça uma vez, faça mais uma vez, e irá melhorando com o tempo!

Se esperar até o tempo estar perfeito, você nunca vai plantar as sementes. Se ficar com medo achando que toda nuvem trará chuva, você jamais fará a colheita.[6]

Como disse o grande jogador de hóquei, Wayne Gretzky: “Você erra 100% das jogadas que nunca faz.”

Diante de algo que é difícil para você fazer, pergunte-se: “Qual a pior coisa que poderia acontecer?” Se responder a essa pergunta e tratar o assunto até decidir que consegue lidar com o pior que poderia acontecer no futuro, verá a tensão se dissipar e conseguirá enfrentar os seus medos.

E se estiver começando um novo projeto ou desafio com o qual não se sente confortável, ou o deixa com medo, é bom dar-se o direito de se sentir desajustado, errar e não ser perfeito. Entenda e aceite que você não terá um bom desempenho no início. Na verdade, pode até falhar logo no começo, e não tem problema.

É normal se sentir um peixe fora d’água até conseguir dominar uma certa atividade, então enfrente o desafio com o pensamento de que está aprendendo, tudo vai dar certo e é perfeitamente aceitável não conseguir desenvolver a atividade, mas se continuar avançando vai melhorar.

Reduzir a expectativa de sucesso imediato torna mais fácil dar o primeiro passo para um novo desafio. Essa atitude pode transformar as primeiras tentativas na porta para um sucesso incrível.

Toda experiência em que você encara o medo acrescenta força, coragem e confiança. ...Você tem que fazer aquilo que acha que não consegue fazer.—Eleanor Roosevelt

Esta é uma história verídica contada por Rory Vaden com a qual todos podemos nos identificar:

Certa vez ouvi falar de uma mulher encurralada no 80º andar de um prédio em chamas. Ela tinha claustrofobia e pavor de altura. Quando o alarme de incêndio disparou, ela se recusou a acompanhar os colegas pela saída de emergência.

Investigando o edifício os bombeiros a encontraram agachada debaixo de sua mesa esperando a morte. Enquanto insistiam que ela descesse a escada, ela gritava: “Estou com medo. Estou com medo!” Por fim um dos bombeiros disse: “Não tem problema. Desça com medo mesmo.” E repetiu isso nos 80 lances de escada até ela chegar em segurança ao andar térreo.

Todos nós já enfrentamos momentos assim na vida profissional, quando sabemos o que precisa ser feito, mas o medo nos trava. Para podermos enfrentar isso devemos cultivar o hábito de agir apesar do medo. Não tem problema sentir medo, simplesmente faça o que tem que fazer apesar do medo. Não tem problema sentir-se inseguro, simplesmente faça apesar da insegurança. Não tem problema sentir-se desconfortável com algo, simplesmente faça mesmo assim. Simplesmente faça.[7]

Eu diria que o mais difícil é dar o primeiro passo. A segunda prova é persistir. Quando você não tem muito talento pra coisa parece que é comum “fracassar”. Voltando ao livro que mencionei antes. Se você não tem experiência em vender o seu livro, provavelmente não vai se sair muito bem. Mas se persistir e aprender a partir das reações das pessoas, dos seus próprios erros e acertos, em breve vai melhorar e eventualmente realizar a proposta com êxito.

Faça — e continue fazendo — aquilo que você tem medo de fazer... é a maneira mais rápida e garantida de descobrir os seus medos e conquistá-los.—Dale Carnegie

Pense em algo que hoje você faz com habilidade e talento, mas que, no começo, sentia-se desajeitado, temeroso e tudo menos capaz.

 Mas você adquiriu confiança e habilidade depois de dar o primeiro passo por fé e enfrentar seus medos repetidas vezes. E isso é difícil para qualquer pessoa!

Um novo desafio pode nos deixar pouco à vontade e até com medo. Mas enfrentar de maneira incisiva e fazer repetidamente aquilo que nos inspira medo, inevitavelmente tornará a tarefa mais fácil e nós nos tornaremos mais hábeis. Isso, em essência, é vencer seus medos!

[1] Deuteronômio 31:6 NVI.

[2] 1 João 4:18 NVI.

[3] “Ataque!” Junho 1972, Artigo 171:1,12.

[4] Rick Warren

[5] Jack Canfield e Mark Victor Hansen, The Aladdin Factor (New York: Berkley Trade, 1995).

[6] Eclesiastes 11:4 NVI.

[7]To Reach the Top, Do What Others Won't,” CNN, 12 de março, 2012.

Slay the Dragon!



Link

Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid or terrified because of them, for the Lord your God goes with you; he will never leave you nor forsake you.1

Throughout our lives, we encounter situations and opportunities that have potential to open new doors of service and influence. Sometimes it’s very clear to us that the Lord is opening a door; other times we simply have a sense in our heart or spirit. That “sense” tugs at our attention, as if the Lord were trying to pull us in a certain direction. There’s often an accompanying feeling of excitement and positive anticipation that calls us to advance into unfamiliar territory.

After years of following God, many of us are pretty experienced in sensing God’s leading and checking in with Him to confirm His will. Therefore, we might feel pretty solid on some new plan and we’re on the verge of making a decision and taking action. Everything is set; we’re ready to start.

But then what happens? Why at times do we delay making the decision or avoid taking the needed first steps?

Often, the culprit is fear. I hate to admit it, but in my own life, fear shows up in many ways and it can be paralyzing. When I stop to think about it, I recognize there are times when I’m afraid of failing or of making a mistake or of what something might cost me in terms of hard work and sacrifice.

Those are not the only kinds of fears that hold us back. Sometimes taking the next step involves asking for something we need—someone’s advice, financial help, or permission. In such instances the fear of rejection comes to the fore. Even if we don’t take the time to analyze and identify our emotions and put these fears into words, they’re there and they hold us back. So, what do we do about that?

God’s Word says: “There is no fear where love exists. Rather, perfect love banishes fear, for fear involves punishment, and the person who lives in fear has not been perfected in love.”2

When we have faith in God’s goodness toward us and we believe He is leading us and He wants to bless us, we are on the path to overcoming fear. But this victory over fear can’t just be in our thoughts; it’s not just a philosophical or spiritual matter. The Lord often expects us to face our fears and take action and move in the direction that He is leading, and through such steps of obedience, no matter how difficult, the Enemy will be defeated and we will overcome our fears.

Facing your fears robs them of their power.—Mark Burnett

The founder of TFI spoke on the topic of fear in an article named “Attack”:

Fear is a very interesting subject. And you don't realize so much of it is subconscious until you try to put it in words and try to analyze it. I suppose my being afraid to talk about my fears is one of the worst fears of all, because to confess your fears is really to expose your innermost self—the part you hide from everybody—even those dearest to you. In fact, the part you're even trying to hide from yourself, because you're afraid to think about it. You don't even want to confess to yourself that you're afraid, because that would be admitting you're a coward, and you don't want to confess you're a coward for fear of being exposed.

So it not only pays to face your fears and to acknowledge them, even confess them, but to take a positive stand against them, especially in the power and Spirit of the Lord with the promises from His Word.3

We have to come to grips with our fears and overcome them so that we can be free to pursue God’s calling and design for our lives—so that we can have the full experience that He intends for us. Judy Blume put it well when she said:

“Each of us must confront our own fears, must come face to face with them. How we handle our fears will determine where we go with the rest of our lives. To experience adventure or to be limited by the fear of it.”

Here’s another good quote on facing fear, this one by Rick Warren:

“The greatest failure is the failure to try. When I die I want four words written on my tombstone: ‘At least he tried.’ For the glory of God. You’ve got to take risks. That’s what brings abundance. That’s what brings success in life. Don’t be afraid to go out on a limb, that’s where the fruit is.”4

In order to take a stand and face our fears, there are practical steps we can take. I’ll touch on a few here, and you might have learned other tactics that work well for you.

Let’s say you have written a book and you’re looking for a publisher. In the meantime, you’ve decided to personally market your book by going to local bookstores and libraries. So you take your 200 printed copies and off you go to pitch your idea to store managers and those who have the authority to help you. But lo and behold, it’s not as easy as you thought it would be to ask them to promote your book. In fact, it’s so hard you don’t make a single request, and you toy with the idea of quitting. You procrastinate. You go to the bookstores, but then walk out again, telling yourself, “It’s not the right time; they’re too busy today.” Eventually you pull the books out of the trunk of your car, thinking that maybe after the school year (or holiday or summer or whatever) will be better timing.

This same scenario of procrastination that leads to inactivity can show up in any number of situations or circumstances. Other examples might include the following: you want to ask for a raise at work, you’re seeking a scholarship for college, you need to approach a donor for sponsorship for a new aspect of your mission work, you want to ask someone out on a date, you want someone to be your mentor, you want more meaning and intimacy from a relationship, you want more responsibility in your place of employment, etc.

If we have a dream, waiting will not help us achieve it. Telling ourselves that tomorrow is better for X reason is usually just an excuse. We’re afraid, and instead of admitting it and taking a chance by taking a step toward that dream, we talk ourselves out of it and then justify our lack of action.

Waiting to develop courage is just another form of procrastination. The most successful people take action while they’re afraid!—Unknown ‎

The best way to change your situation is to do something different. You have likely heard these two familiar sayings:

“If you keep doing what you’ve always done, you’ll keep on getting what you’ve always got. The definition of insanity is continuing the same behavior and expecting different results.”

When we feel that nudge in the spirit and we have a pretty good idea that God wants us to do something, we have to take the first step. He can’t do that for us. Often, the longer we wait, the more nervous we get.

Inaction breeds doubt and fear. Action breeds confidence and courage. If you want to conquer fear, do not sit home and think about it. Go out and get busy.—Dale Carnegie

We are creatures of habit, we get used to things the way they are, and consequently it’s hard and scary to change; it’s uncomfortable.

Growth and development require some discomfort. As one young skiing enthusiast [said], “If you want to get good at skiing, you’ve got to get comfortable being uncomfortable.”

[Many of the things we need to do to reach our goals] may all be things that are uncomfortable at first. So what! Do it anyway! One of the ways to get through the discomfort is simply to do the thing you are uncomfortable doing.5

An important aspect of getting out of your comfort zone has to do with startingbefore you feel ready. If you wait until you feel like you’re “ready”… well, we know what that leads to—procrastination, distraction, perfectionism, and sadly, often total inaction. Realistically, you may never feel like you’re ready. So if we can muster up the courage to just start, even if we don’t feel ready, we’ll be miles ahead.

Winners are those people who make a habit of doing the things that [others] are uncomfortable doing.—Ed Foreman

Let’s apply the wise advice of Napoleon Hill:

“Don’t wait. The time will never be just right.”

The sooner we take the plunge and endure those terribly uncomfortable first steps, the sooner we’ll get past that scary stage and start to have a lot more fun and success. It’s a predictable cycle: Decide what you want to do, be confident of God’s blessing in the matter, make a plan, commit to a plan, begin, do it again and again, and with time you’ll get better and better!

If you wait for perfect weather, you will never plant your seeds. If you are afraid that every cloud will bring rain, you will never harvest your crops.6

As hockey great Wayne Gretzky said, “You miss 100% of the shots you never take.”

When you are faced with doing something that’s difficult for you, ask yourself: “What’s the worst that could happen?” When you answer that question and then deal with it until you determine that you’d be able to handle that worst-case scenario, it will relieve the tension and help you to face your fears.

Also, if you’re embarking on a new project or challenge that makes you feel uneasy and scared, it helps if you give yourself permission to be awkward and to stumble and to not be perfect. Realize and accept that you’re not going to be good in the beginning. In fact, you might fail at first, and that’s okay.

There’s nothing wrong with being awkward while you’re getting the hang of something new, so go ahead with whatever the challenge is and just say to yourself, “I’m learning, I’ll be okay. It’s perfectly fine that I’m not very good at this yet. I’ll get better. I’m going through the steps to greatness.”

When you lower your expectations for immediate success, it makes it easier for you to actually make the first move toward a new challenge. With this attitude, the “firsts” that we’re afraid of can become gateways to amazing progress.

You gain strength, courage and confidence by every experience in which you really stop and look fear in the face. … You must do the thing you think you cannot do.—Eleanor Roosevelt

Here’s a true story that we might all relate to, as told by Rory Vaden:

I once heard a true story of a woman who was trapped in a burning building on the 80th floor. She was terrified of heights and enclosed spaces, and when the fire alarm went off, she refused to follow her colleagues into the stairwell to evacuate to safety.

The firemen did a sweep of the building and found her hiding under her desk, waiting to die. She was screaming “I'm scared, I'm scared!” as the firemen insisted she walk down the stairwell until one fireman said, “That's OK, just do it scared.” He repeated it all the way down the 80 flights of stairs, until he brought her to safety.

We've all faced these moments in our careers—when you know what has to be done, but your fear holds you back. In order to stand out, you must develop the habit of acting in the face of fear. It's fine to be scared—do it scared. It's fine to be unsure—do it unsure. It's fine to be uncomfortable—do it uncomfortable. Just do something.7

I’d say taking that first daunting step is the hardest part. The next biggest test comes in persisting. When you’re not good at something, you encounter a lot of seeming “failure.” Back to the book scenario I mentioned earlier: If you’re not experienced in pitching your book, you probably won’t be that great at it to start with. But if you keep doing it over and over, and learning from others’ reactions and your mistakes and successes, pretty soon you’ll be good, and then great, and eventually find success.

Do the thing you fear and keep on doing it … that is the quickest and surest way ever yet discovered to conquer fear.—Dale Carnegie

You can probably think of some skill or talent that you’re really good at, but when you look back to when you first started, you will recall you were clumsy, scared, and anything but an expert. But becoming skilled and confident all started with you taking the plunge and stepping out by faith to do whatever you were afraid of—again and again and again. And that is not easy for anyone.

A new challenge can be very awkward for us, even scary, at first. But if we deliberately put ourselves out there and do the very thing that we’re afraid of over and over, inevitably it will become easier and we’ll get better at it. Eventually we will no longer be afraid. That is, in essence, conquering our fears!


1 Deuteronomy 31:6 NIV.


2 1 John 4:18 ISV.


3 “Attack!” June 1972, ML 171:1,12.


4 Rick Warren


5 Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen, The Aladdin Factor (New York: Berkley Trade, 1995).


6 Ecclesiastes 11:4 ERV.


7To Reach the Top, Do What Others Won't,” CNN, March 12, 2012.

Russian Military Forces Arrive In Syria, Set Forward Operating Base Near Damascus


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/01/2015

While military direct intervention by US, Turkish, and Gulf forces over Syrian soil escalates with every passing day, even as Islamic State forces capture increasingly more sovereign territory, in the central part of the country, the Nusra Front dominant in the northwestern region province of Idlib and the official "rebel" forces in close proximity to Damascus, the biggest question on everyone's lips has been one: would Putin abandon his protege, Syria's president Assad, to western "liberators" in the process ceding control over Syrian territory which for years had been a Russian national interest as it prevented the passage of regional pipelines from Qatar and Saudi Arabia into Europe, in the process eliminating Gazprom's - and Russia's - influence over the continent.

As recently as a month ago, the surprising answer appeared to be an unexpected "yes", as we described in detail in "The End Draws Near For Syria's Assad As Putin's Patience "Wears Thin." Which would make no sense: why would Putin abdicate a carefully cultivated relationship, one which served both sides (Russia exported weapons, provides military support, and in exchange got a right of first and only refusal on any traversing pipelines through Syria) for years, just to take a gamble on an unknown future when the only aggressor was a jihadist spinoff which had been created as byproduct of US intervention in the region with the specific intention of achieving precisely this outcome: overthrowing Assad (see "Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad").

As it turns out, it may all have been just a ruse. Because as Ynet reports, not only has Putin not turned his back on Assad, or Syria, but the Russian reinforcements are well on their way. Reinforcements for what? Why to fight the evil Islamic jihadists from ISIS of course, the same artificially created group of bogeyman that the US, Turkey, and Saudis are all all fighting. In fact, this may be the first world war in which everyone is "fighting" an opponent that everyone knows is a proxy for something else.

According to Ynet, Russian fighter pilots are expected to begin arriving in Syria in the coming days, and will fly their Russian air force fighter jets and attack helicopters against ISIS and rebel-aligned targets within the failing state.

And just like the US and Turkish air forces are supposedly in the region to "eradicate the ISIS threat", there can't be any possible complaints that Russia has also decided to take its fight to the jihadists - even if it is doing so from the territory of what the real goal of US and Turkish intervention is - Syria. After all, it is a free for all against ISIS, right?

From Ynet:

According to Western diplomats, a Russian expeditionary force has already arrived in Syria and set up camp in an Assad-controlled airbase. The base is said to be in area surrounding Damascus, and will serve, for all intents and purposes, as a Russian forward operating base.

In the coming weeks thousands of Russian military personnel are set to touch down in Syria, including advisors, instructors, logistics personnel, technical personnel, members of the aerial protection division, and the pilots who will operate the aircraft.

The Israeli outlet needless adds that while the current makeup of the Russian expeditionary force is still unknown, "there is no doubt that Russian pilots flying combat missions in Syrian skies will definitely change the existing dynamics in the Middle East."

Why certainly: because in one move Putin, who until this moment had been curiously non-commital over Syria's various internal and exteranl wars, just made the one move the puts everyone else in check: with Russian forces in Damascus implicitly supporting and guarding Assad, the western plan instantly falls apart.

It gets better: if what Ynet reports is accurate, Iran's brief tenure as Obama's BFF in the middle east is about to expire:

Western diplomatic sources recently reported that a series of negotiations had been held between the Russians and the Iranians, mainly focusing on ISIS and the threat it poses to the Assad regime. The infamous Iranian Quds Force commander Major General Qasem Soleimani recently visited Moscow in the framework of these talks. As a result the Russians and the Iranians reached a strategic decision: Make any effort necessary to preserve Assad's seat of power, so that Syria may act as a barrier, and prevent the spread of ISIS and Islamist backed militias into the former Soviet Islamic republics.

See: the red herring that is ISIS can be used just as effectively for defensive purposes as for offensive ones. And since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!

That said, we look forward to Obama explaining the American people how the US is collaborating with the one mid-east entity that is supporting not only Syria, but now is explicitly backing Putin as well.

It gets better: Ynet adds that "Western diplomatic sources have emphasized that the Obama administration is fully aware of the Russian intent to intervene directly in Syria, but has yet to issue any reaction... The Iranians and the Russians- with the US well aware- have begun the struggle to reequip the Syrian army, which has been left in tatters by the civil war. They intend not only to train Assad's army, but to also equip it. During the entire duration of the civil war, the Russians have consistently sent a weapons supply ship to the Russian held port of Tartus in Syria on a weekly basis. The ships would bring missiles, replacement parts, and different types of ammunition for the Syrian army."

Finally, it appears not only the US military-industrial complex is set to profit from the upcoming war: Russian dockbuilders will also be rewarded:

Arab media outlets have recently published reports that Syria and Russia were looking for an additional port on the Syrian coast, which will serve the Russians in their mission to hasten the pace of the Syrian rearmament.

If all of the above is correct, the situation in the middle-east is set to escalate very rapidly over the next few months, and is likely set to return to the face-off last seen in the summer of 2013 when the US and Russian navies were within earshot of each other, just off the coast of Syria, and only a last minute bungled intervention by Kerry avoided the escalation into all out war. Let's hope Kerry has it in him to make the same mistake twice.

Link

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Benjamin Netanyahu Threatens Shoot-To-Kill Crackdown on Stone-Throwers


Jeffrey Heller, The Forward, September 2, 2015

Israel is considering giving its security forces a freer hand to shoot at young Palestinian stone-throwers, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said on Wednesday.

Under standing orders, Israeli soldiers facing violent Palestinian protests can open fire with live bullets only in life-threatening situations. That effectively bans firing at Palestinians who flee after hurling a rock or petrol bomb.

But after meeting with several cabinet ministers and security chiefs to discuss an increase in stone-throwing in Jerusalem and on a highway in the occupied West Bank, Netanyahu suggested the rules could be hardened.

“Since the justice system finds it difficult to deal with minors who throw rocks, changes to orders on opening fire towards stone- and petrol bomb-throwers will be examined,” the prime minister’s office said in a statement.

Netanyahu was quoted as saying at the session that his government’s policy was one of “zero tolerance towards stone-throwing and zero tolerance towards terror.”

Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s Executive Committee, criticized the potential new policy.

“This rightist Israeli fanatic government is pursuing its criminal policy to kill Palestinians. The new regulations would mean more escalation, killings and crimes against our people” he told Reuters.

While tougher action against Palestinian stone-throwers would likely draw international concern, Netanyahu’s government and the military have been facing calls from Israeli settler leaders in the West Bank for a security crackdown.

In July, Israel’s parliament imposed tougher penalties of up to 20 years in prison for people throwing rocks at vehicles, after a wave of Palestinian protests in occupied East Jerusalem.

The Israeli human rights group B’Tselem lists 12 Palestinian minors who were shot and killed by Israeli forces during protests and clashes in the West Bank in 2014. In at least four of those incidents, Israel said the youngsters had been throwing rocks or petrol bombs, according to B’Tselem.

Report: Gaza could be uninhabitable in 5 years

Jeva Lange, The Week, Sept. 2, 2015

There could soon be no more Gaza Strip if conditions don’t turn around very quickly. A recent U.N. report has found that economic conditions in Gaza are so bad that the entire region could be “uninhabitable” by 2020.

A stretch of Palestine wedged between Israel, Egypt, and the Mediterranean Sea, the Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated regions of the world with 1.8 million residents living in a mere 225 square miles of land. But after three conflicts with Israel and an almost decade-long blockade, Gaza now has an almost post-apocalyptic feel.

Its unemployment rate is 44 percent and its GDP dropped below 15 percent last year. Seventy-two percent of households are food insecure and over 95 percent of its main source of water is said to be non-potable. Its electricity production can’t cover even 40 percent of demand.

The report faults the Israeli blockade for impoverishing the population. It also cited the 2014 war with Israel that left 73 Israelis and 2,200 Palestinians dead for wrecking Gaza’s economy and destroying much of its infrastructure. More than 20,000 Palestinian homes and numerous schools, hospitals, and factories were ruined in the conflict.

“The humanitarian catastrophe is man-made,” the deputy director of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights told Al Jazeera. “The answer is only through our man-made policies.”

As Disciplinas Espirituais: Jejum



Link By P. Amsterdam

Muitos têm dificuldade com a prática do jejum enquanto disciplina espiritual. Como muitos de nós, jejuei algumas vezes, mas isso faz muitos anos, décadas. Não tenho sido um grande entusiasta do jejum, mas estudar a esse respeito no ano passado me levou a tentar de novo. Ainda bem. De um modo geral, no ano passado, jejuei uma vez por semana e, em certa ocasião, por três dias. Estou longe de ser um especialista, mas estou muito feliz por estar aprendendo a esse respeito e vivenciando a prática, a qual descobri ser espiritualmente recompensadora.

O jejum na forma como aqui é abordado se limitará à abstinência de alimentos, como é tratado na Bíblia. O princípio pode ser aplicado também à privação de outras coisas, tais como televisão, outras formas de entretenimento, o uso da Internet para fins recreativos, mídias sociais, consumo de álcool ou conversar com os outros. Tudo para permitir maior concentração nas questões espirituais. Contudo, neste ensaio, trataremos especificamente da abstinência de alimentação.

No Antigo Testamento, no Novo Testamento e na prática do cristianismo em geral, jejuar foi, por muitos séculos, uma prática bastante corriqueira. Na Bíblia, lemos sobre tipos de jejum que diferiam entre si no tocante ao consumo de comida ou água.
Tipos de jejum

Um jejum normal seria aquele em que a pessoa se abstém de toda forma de alimento, exceto a água. É provável que ao jejuar por quarenta dias antes de começar Seu ministério, Jesus tenha ficado sem comer, mas consumido água. Lemos em Lucas: Naqueles dias não comeu coisa alguma, e terminados eles, teve fome.[1] Mateus escreveu: Depois de jejuar por quarenta dias e quarenta noites, teve fome.[2] Essas passagens nada dizem sobre Ele ter sede, mas que nada comeu. Como o corpo humano não pode funcionar normalmente por mais de três dias sem água, supõe-se que Ele tenha bebido água naquele período.[3]

Um jejum parcial é aquele em que não se consomem alguns tipos de comida, como fizeram Daniel e seus três companheiros, ao pedirem ao oficial babilônio:“Experimenta, peço-te, os teus servos dez dias, fazendo que se nos deem legumes a comer e água a beber.”[4] Por essa definição, João Batista foi outro que praticou o jejum parcial, ao limitar o que comia a “gafanhoto e mel silvestre”.[5]Em toda a história da cristandade, os crentes se dedicaram a jejuns parciais pela redução da quantidade de comida consumida ou ao se restringir a alimentos simples.

Certas situações demandam jejuns absolutos, em que não há consumo de sólidos nem de líquidos. Ester pediu que os judeus em toda a Susã se abstivessem de comer e de beber durante três dias, nem de dia nem de noite.[6] Saulo, que mais tarde passou a ser conhecido como Apóstolo Paulo, observou jejum absoluto após seu contato com o Cristo ressurreto.

Esteve três dias sem ver, e não comeu nem bebeu.[7]

A Bíblia também fala sobre jejuns sobrenaturais. Donald Whitney assim explica essa modalidade:

Esse tipo de jejum aparece em duas situações. Ao escrever sobre seu encontro com Deus no Monte Sinais, Moises relatou: “Fiquei no monte quarenta dias e quarenta noites, sem comer pão nem beber água” (Deuteronômio 9:9). O versículo 1 Reis 19:8 parece sugerir que Elias fez o mesmo quando foi ao mesmo local do jejum milagroso de Moisés: “Levantou-se, comeu e bebeu. Com a força daquela comida caminhou quarenta dias e quarenta noites até Horebe, o monte de Deus.” Essas experiências exigiram a intervenção sobrenatural de Deus nos processos do corpo e nisso não diferem de outras manifestações e provisão milagrosa de Deus.[8]

Os cristãos hoje que por quarenta dias praticam os chamados jejum normaisconsomem líquidos, diferentemente dos jejuns sobrenaturais que Moisés fez e, possivelmente, Elias também.

As Escrituras falam também de jejum congregacionais,[9] em que os crentes jejuam juntos para um fim específicos e jejuns nacionais[10], durante os quais participam todo o país ou todo o povo. Neste arquivo, trataremos dos jejuns particulares, aos quais Jesus se referiu quando ensinou:

Tu, porém, quando jejuares, unge a cabeça, e lava o rosto, para não pareceres aos homens que jejuas, mas a teu Pai, que está em secreto; e teu Pai, que vê em secreto, te recompensará.[11]

De um modo geral, os atuais praticantes do jejum enquanto disciplina espiritual se abstêm de comida, mas não de água (jejuns normais) e muitos o fazem sem que os outros o saibam (jejuns particulares).

Não há um mandamento explícito no Novo Testamento segundo o qual os cristãos devam jejuar. Não é uma obrigação expressa. Entretanto, a maneira como Jesus tratou o tema revela que havia uma expectativa de que os crentes aderissem à prática. No versículo citado anteriormente, Jesus diz que quandojejuarmos, não devemos parecer tristes e que devemos fazê-lo em segredo. Usou uma linguagem similar ao ensinar acerca da oração:

“E, quando orares, não sejas como os hipócritas,[...] mas [...] ora a teu Pai que está em secreto. E, orando, não useis de vãs repetições, como os gentios…”[12]

Da mesma forma falou sobre dar:

“Portanto, quando deres esmola, não faças tocar trombeta diante de ti […]Quando tu deres esmola, não saiba a tua esquerda o que faz a tua direita…”[13]

A palavra “quando” usada dessa forma sugere que se pressupõe que essas práticas se deem com alguma frequência.

Richard Foster assim explica essa questão:

É de certa forma um pressuposto que dar, orar e jejuar sejam parte da devoção cristã. Não temos por que excluir a prática do jejum dos ensinamentos [de Jesus], da mesma forma que não excluímos a generosidade ou a oração. … Tendo dito isso, contudo, devemos entender que essas palavras não se constituem mandamento. Jesus estava ensinando como deveria ser o exercício de uma prática comum nos Seus dias. Nada disse sobre ser algo certo ou que devesse ser continuado. Ele não diz “Se você orar” nem “Você tem de orar.” Suas instruções dizem respeito simplesmente a “quando você orar.”[14]

Quando os discípulos de João Batista questionaram Jesus com respeito aos motivos de Seus discípulos não jejuarem, ao contrário do faziam eles próprios e os fariseus, respondeu:

“Podem estar tristes os convidados para o casamento, enquanto o noivo está com eles? Dias, porém, virão em que o noivo lhes será tirado, e nesses dias jejuarão.”[15]

Como Jesus estava com eles, era tempo de festejar; não, jejuar.[16] Aproximava-se contudo o tempo em que Ele lhes seria tirado e, então, jejuariam. Não há registro na Bíblia de que Seus discípulos tivessem feito algum jejum no período em que Jesus estava com eles, mas lemos de situações em que, depois da Sua ascensão, a igreja primitiva jejuou.[17]

É interessante notar que nas vezes em que Jesus falou que em segredo deveriam ser feitas as doações aos necessitados, as orações e os jejuns, explicou que essas práticas tinham atreladas a elas uma promessa de recompensa.

Quando tu deres esmola, não saiba a tua esquerda o que faz a tua direita, para que a tua esmola seja dada secretamente. Então teu Pai, que vê em secreto, te recompensará.[18] Quando orares, entra no teu aposento, e, fechando a tua porta, ora a teu Pai que está em secreto. E teu Pai, que vê secretamente, te recompensará.[19] Quando jejuares, unge a cabeça, e lava o rosto, para não pareceres aos homens que jejuas, mas a teu Pai, que está em secreto; e teu Pai, que vê em secreto, te recompensará.[20]

Mesmo não sendo um mandamento no Novo Testamento, o jejum é uma disciplina espiritual disponível aos que desejam se tornar como Jesus para crescer em santidade. Como todas as disciplinas espirituais, a prática do jejum não é uma forma de crescer em merecimento ou em favor diante de Deus. Não jejuamos para impressioná-lO, para conseguir algo que desejamos nem para sermos por Ele aceitos. O amor e a aceitação de Deus já nos são garantidos pelo sacrifício de Jesus na cruz.

Resumi a seguir exemplos que Donald Whitney deu de diferentes situações no Antigo Testamento que mostram quando e por que o jejum pode ser benéfico.
Para fortalecer a oração

Quando ouvi estas palavras, assentei-me e chorei. Lamentei por alguns dias, e estive jejuando e orando perante o Deus dos céus.[21]

Dirigi o meu rosto ao Senhor Deus, para o buscar com oração e rogos, com jejum, pano de saco e cinza.[22]

Assim jejuamos, e pedimos isto ao nosso Deus, e ele atendeu à nossa oração.[23]

No livro “O jejum escolhido por Deus”, Arthur Wallis explica:

O jejum tem a intenção de denotar urgência e importunidade em nossa oração, para dar força ao pedido que levamos à corte do céu. Quem ora em jejum comunica ao céu que está de fato determinado … Mais que isso, expressa sua determinação de uma maneira que Deus disse que deveria. Está usando um recurso por Deus escolhido padra fazer sua voz ser ouvida no Céu.[24]
Ao buscar a orientação de Deus

O jejum pode ser útil quando se está buscando a vontade de Deus em alguma decisão, quando se busca Sua orientação. Vemos um exemplo disso quando os filhos de Israel jejuaram e oraram em busca da Sua vontade no que dizia respeito a continuar lutando, depois de terem sofrido perdas devastadoras por dois dias consecutivos.

Então todos os filhos de Israel, o exército todo, subiram e, vindo a Betel, choraram, e estiveram ali perante o Senhor. Jejuaram aquele dia até a tarde e ofereceram holocaustos e ofertas pacíficas perante o Senhor … dizendo: “Tornaremos a sair ainda a pelejar contra os filhos de Benjamim, nosso irmão, ou desistiremos?” Respondeu o Senhor: “Subi, que amanhã eu os entregarei nas vossas mãos.”[25]
Em tempos de angústia

São muitos os exemplos bíblicos em que se recorreu ao jejum e à oração para se lidar com o sentimento de perda causado pela morte de alguém.[26] Jejuar também pode ser uma resposta à angústia e ao remorso resultante do pecado, assim como uma maneira de expressar nosso pesar por havermos pecado contra o Senhor. O jejum não produz o perdão, pois este é uma dádiva concedida pela salvação. Entretanto, somos instruídos a confessar nossos pecados ao Senhor. Se confessarmos os nossos pecados, ele é fiel e justo para nos perdoar os pecados, e nos purificar de toda injustiça.[27] Jejuar não faz ninguém mais digno de perdão, mas pode comunicar a angústia que a confissão em palavras não consegue expressar.[28]
Ao buscar libertação ou proteção

Em todo o Antigo Testamento encontramos exemplos de pessoas que acrescentaram o jejum às suas orações por proteção e libertação. Em várias dessas situações, temos casos de jejuns congregacionais ou nacionais, em que os ameaçados pelo perigo jejuaram juntos, rogando a proteção do Senhor.

Então vieram alguns e disseram a Jeosafá: “Vem contra ti uma grande multidão dalém do mar e da Síria. Já estão em Hazazom-Tamar, que é En-Gedi Temeu Jeosafá, e pôs-se a buscar o Senhor, e apregoou jejum em todo o Judá. Judá se ajuntou para pedir socorro ao Senhor; também de todas as cidades de Judá o povo veio para buscar ao Senhor.[29]

Então [eu, Esdras] apregoei ali um jejum junto ao rio Aava, para nos humilharmos diante da face de nosso Deus, a fim de lhe pedirmos jornada segura para nós e para nossos filhos, e para todas as nossas posses. Tive vergonha de pedir ao rei soldados e cavaleiros para nos defenderem do inimigo no caminho, porque tínhamos dito ao rei: “A mão do nosso Deus é sobre todos os que o buscam para o bem, mas a sua força e a sua ira sobre todos os que o deixam.” Assim jejuamos, e pedimos isto ao nosso Deus, e ele atendeu à nossa oração.[30]

Há também o relato de quando Ester pediu aos judeus moradores em Susã jejuassem e orassem antes que ela arriscasse a vida ao ir diante de Deus sem ser anunciada.[31]

Lemos também quando o rei Davi jejuou e orou porque as pessoas falavam e faziam acusações contra ele com grande ódio. Pelo que se lê, parece que seu jejum foi longo, a ponto de seu corpo ficar magro e fraco.

Ó Senhor Deus, sê comigo por amor do teu nome; por causa da bondade do teu amor, livra-me! Pois estou aflito e necessitado, e dentro em mim está aflito o meu coração. De jejuar estão enfraquecidos os meus joelhos; a minha carne emagrece.[32]

Quando você for difamado, acusado falsamente ou perseguido pela sua fé, você pode ir ao Senhor em oração e jejuar por proteção e libertação.
Humilhe-se diante de Deus

O jejum pode ser uma expressão física de humildade diante do Senhor. Davi disse em Salmos: Usei vestes de lamento, humilhei-me com jejum e recolhi-me em oração.[33] Se por um lado, não há nada que possamos fazer para nos tornar humildes, jejuar expressa ao Senhor que dependemos dEle e que somos fracos sem Ele. O jejum nos faz entender quão rapidamente a falta de comida nos afeta. Muitas vezes, sentimo-nos fortes e autossuficientes, de forma que pode ser bem humilhante perceber quão frágeis na verdade somos.
Para superar a tentação e se dedicar ao Senhor

Pode haver situações em que precisemos de ajuda adicional para vencer certas tentações ou pecados recorrentes. É possível que nos vejamos diante de decisões que vão trazer benefícios para nossa vida, mas talvez nos coloquem em uma condição em que teremos menos tempo para o Senhor ou mais próximos de alguma tentação. É em momentos assim que o jejum pode nos ajudar a dominar a tentação ou renovar nossa dedicação ao Senhor. Durante o jejum que fez antes do início do Seu ministério, Jesus derrotou todas as tentações que o assediavam, pelo que recebeu o poder de Deus.[34]
Para expressar amor pelo Senhor e adorá-lO

O jejum pode ser uma forma de devoção a Deus, uma expressão do nosso amor por Ele, de gratidão por tudo que faz por nós, um ato de adoração e louvor. Jejuar pode ser uma forma de mostrar a Deus que Ele é mais importante para você do que alimentar-se, que você está disposto a deixar de lado o prazer e até a necessidade de comer por um tempo para se concentrar nEle e que estar à Sua presença é alimento para você.
Quando jejuar …

Como explicado anteriormente, não há um mandamento explícito segundo o qual temos de jejuar. O jejum é um assunto privado entre cada um e o Senhor. O jejum não soma pontos a seu favor, não lhe dá melhores condições de barganha com Deus nem garante que Ele atenderá às suas orações. Entretanto, a exemplo das demais disciplinas espirituais, quem jejua se coloca numa situação de maior receptividade a Deus.

Se escolher jejuar, pode ser melhor começar por abster-se de uma refeição ou talvez duas, do passar três dias ou mais sem comer. Na primeira vez, poderá ficar sem almoçar e, na seguinte, passar também sem o jantar. Dessa forma, logo depois de uma refeição, começa o jejum que terminará no café da manhã seguinte, o que significa que jejuou cerca de 24 horas. Com o tempo, poderá começar após a janta e se abster do café da manhã, almoço e jantar do outro dia, quebrando o jejum na manhã do dia seguinte. Assim, jejuaria por 36 horas. Para alguns, tornar o jejum uma prática regular funciona bem. Há várias opções de jejum, alternativas para se iniciar na prática e formar o hábito, o que dá aos que escolhem jejuar a possibilidade de experimentar e encontrar o que lhe parecer melhor para si.

Jejuns que durem três, cinco, dez dias ou mais exigem maiores conhecimentos quanto às possíveis consequências, quanto às formas para se manter hidratado e quebrar o jejum sem prejudicar o corpo. Se escolher jejuar por períodos mais longos, consulte os sites da Internet relacionados no fim deste artigo com informações importantes que devem ser lidas e observadas. O jejum não é aconselhável para diabéticos, para pessoas cuja saúde é afetada pela dieta, mulheres grávidas ou que amamentam, indivíduos enfermos, frágeis, em período de recuperação após alguma doença ou com qualquer outro problema de saúde. Aqueles nessas condições que desejarem jejuar devem antes consultar um médico. O mesmo se aplica aos que estejam tomando medicamentos fortes. Pessoas com quaisquer problemas de saúde devem consultar o médico para averiguar se é seguro jejuar. As crianças não devem pular refeições, mas podem, se quiserem, abrir mão de sobremesas ou de comer doces.

Talvez não lhe seja possível jejuar várias refeições consecutivas por motivos de trabalho, de saúde ou por ter de cuidar de sua família. Uma opção para esses casos é abster-se de uma refeição e dedicar o tempo que gastaria para comer à oração, leitura ou, talvez, à testificação. Uma ideia para quem come fora nos dias de trabalho ou tem o hábito de sair para jantar é abster-se de uma refeição por semana e doar o dinheiro economizado para alguém que precise.

Jejuar pode parecer um passo grande para alguns. Para mim, parecia. Posso dizer, contudo, da minha experiência, que estou feliz por ter dado esse passo, pois sinto que tenho me beneficiado da prática dessa disciplina espiritual. Não posso dizer necessariamente que jejuar me trouxe alguma bênção ou recompensa específica, mas não é para isso que jejuo. Não faço jejum para conseguir algo do Senhor, mas porque O amo, por ser uma maneira de expressar esse amor e lhe dizer que Ele está em primeiro lugar na minha vida. As bênçãos espirituais ou outros resultados que disso advierem são efeitos secundários e estão completamente nas mãos do Senhor. Jejuar ou praticar qualquer uma das outras disciplinas espirituais é um compromisso que tenho em viver de acordo com a palavra e natureza de Deus. Meu desejo é fazer o que puder para ser mais como Jesus, para ter um relacionamento estreito com Deus e viver em conformidade com Sua vontade. Para mim isso já é recompensador. Vou concluir com uma citação de Donald Whitney que expressa o que tenho vivenciado desde que passei a jejuar.

Como todas as disciplinas espirituais, o jejum abre a vela da alma ao gracioso vento do Espírito de Deus. Além disso, jejuar adiciona uma dimensão especial à sua vida espiritual e o ajuda a crescer na semelhança de Cristo.[35]

Sites da Internet com informações sobre os aspectos físicos de fazer e interromper o jejum:

http://www.ihopkc.org/about/fasting-guidelines-and-information/

http://viralchrist.com/spiritual-growth/prayer/1163-the-most-important-part-of-fasting-is-how-to-break-it
Nota

A menos que de outra forma indicado, todos os versículos aqui citados foram extraídos da “Bíblia Sagrada” — Tradução de João Ferreira de Almeida — Edição Contemporânea, Copyright © 1990, por Editora Vida.



[1] Lucas 4:2.

[2] Mateus 4:2.

[3] Donald S. Whitney, Disciplinas espirituais para a vida cristã (Editora: Batista Regular, 2009).

[4] Daniel 1:12.

[5] Ver Mateus 3:4.

[6] Ester 4:16.

[7] Atos 9:9.

[8] Whitney, Disciplinas Espirituais, 162.

[9] Tocai a trombeta em Sião, santificai um jejum, proclamai um dia de assembleia solene. Congregai o povo, santificai a congregação, ajuntai os anciãos, congregai os filhinhos, e os que mamam. Saia o noivo da sua recâmara, e a noiva do seu tálamo. (Joel 2:15–16).

[10] Temeu Jeosafá, e pôs-se a buscar o Senhor, e apregoou jejum em todo o Judá. Judá se ajuntou para pedir socorro ao Senhor; também de todas as cidades de Judá o povo veio para buscar ao Senhor (2 Crônicas 20:3–4). Ver também Neemias 9:1, Ester 4:16 e Jonas 3:5–8.

[11] Mateus 6:17–18.

[12] Mateus 6:5–7.

[13] Mateus 6:2–3.

[14] Richard J. Foster, Celebração da Disciplina (São Paulo: Editora Vida, 2007.).

[15] Mateus 9:15.

[16] Foster, Celebração da Disciplina.

[17] Servindo eles ao Senhor, e jejuando, disse o Espírito Santo: “Apartai-me a Barnabé e a Saulo para a obra a que os tenho chamado.” Então, depois de jejuarem e orarem, puseram sobre eles as mãos, e os despediram. (Atos 13:2–3).

E, havendo-lhes por comum consentimento, eleito anciãos em cada igreja com oração e jejuns, os encomendaram ao Senhor, em quem haviam crido (Atos 14:23).

[18] Mateus 6:3–4.

[19] Mateus 6:6.

[20] Mateus 6:17–18.

[21] Neemias 1:4.

[22] Daniel 9:3.

[23] Esdras 8:23.

[24] Arthur Wallis, God’s Chosen Fast (Fort Washington, PA: Christian Literature Crusade, 1968), 42, cotado em Donald S. Whitney, Disciplinas espirituais para a vida cristã (Colorado Springs: Navpress, 1991), 166.

[25] Juízes 20:26–28.

[26] 1 Samuel 31:12–13; 2 Samuel 1:11–12; Juízes 20:25–26.

[27] 1 João 1:9.

[28] Whitney, Disciplinas espirituais, 169.

[29] 2 Crônicas 20:2–4.

[30] Esdras 8:21–23.

[31] Vai, ajunta todos os judeus que se acharem em Susã, e jejuai por mim. Não comais nem bebais durante três dias, nem de dia nem de noite, e eu e as minhas moças também assim jejuaremos. Depois irei ter com o rei, ainda que seja contra a lei. E se eu perecer, pereci (Ester 4:16).

[32] Salmo 109:21–22, 24.

[33] Salmo 35:13 NVI.

[34] Whitney, Disciplinas espirituais, 175.

[35] Whitney, Disciplinas espirituais, 180.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith