Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Fé Racional

Elsa Sichrovsky
[A Rational Faith]
http://anchor.tfionline.com/pt/post/fe-racional/

Como um típico deslumbrado calouro da faculdade sentado na minha primeira aula de literatura ocidental, ouvi a minha professora favorita, Sra. Chang, ler a história de Abraão e Isaque. A singularidade da história do Gênesis, com a sua narrativa judaica tipicamente seca que registra histórias profundas como aquela sobre o Deus que dá o primeiro filho a um casal e manda o pai assassinar seu filho alguns anos mais tarde — e na hora H muda de ideia, tudo isso confundiu os outros calouros. Não era exatamente o que a maioria de nós imaginava quando pensava na linda palavra mitologia, a definição da minha professora a essas histórias. Um mito.

Ela olhou para cima tirando os olhos do pesado volume, sorriu com empatia para os alunos perplexos e disse: “É por isso que eu não sou cristã. O Deus da Bíblia hebraica não faz sentido para mim. A fé é irracional.”

“E, por favor”, ela continuou, “se houver cristãos nesta sala, não tentem discutir comigo. Estamos estudando literatura, não religião.” Tive que me esforçar para ficar quieto.

Segundo ela, a fé, a pedra angular da minha vida desde que aprendi a cantar “Jesus me ama” com entusiasmo infantil, era uma noção ridícula e bizarra demais para se dar o trabalho de tentar compreender. A fé o colocava em situações estranhamente difíceis com um Deus falível e errático que apenas o faz passar por experiências torturantes para Sua própria satisfação. Certamente não era coisa para estudantes brilhantes como ela pensava.

Não foi a primeira vez que ouvi um comentário como esse. Desde pequeno, a experiência em atividades de evangelismo pessoal me deixou acostumado a olhares incrédulos e gargalhadas daqueles que eu tentava convencer a aceitar a mensagem da salvação. Mas quando a pessoa que eu tanto admirava disse a mesma coisa, isso desencadeou uma série de perguntas na minha cabeça: Por que a fé é tão difícil de entender? Se é tão importante para a vida eterna e a felicidade presente, por que haveria de ser um conceito tão estranho e até repulsivo? Por que Deus não fez a Bíblia um pouco menos crítica e mais como os artigos de autoajuda na Internet que explicam todos os valores importantes de viver bem em três pontos principais, com resumos claros e destaques?

Pior ainda, suas palavras soaram desconfortavelmente verdadeiras segundo minha própria experiência espiritual. Os caminhos de Deus tantas vezes me pareceram além da razão e levaram a caminhos de luta e dolorosos. Às vezes, o propósito por trás da incerteza ficava claro, mas muitas outras vezes eu passava por uma provação com perguntas não respondidas. Tinha valido a pena me agarrar à uma fé que muitas pessoas dizem não fazer sentido e que na verdade acrescentava incerteza à minha vida?

De repente, para minha surpresa, uma citação que eu tinha lido no ensino médio no livro de Biologia me ocorreu:

“Se o cérebro fosse tão simples a ponto de conseguirmos entendê-lo, seríamos tão simplórios que não conseguiríamos.”[1]

O cérebro estava além da nossa compreensão não por ser um projeto mal feito que não valia a pena a nossa atenção; era simplesmente mais maravilhoso, mais espantosamente complexo do que a mente humana é capaz de analisar e processar. O fato dos humanos não conseguirem compreender o cérebro não foi razão para Watson desistir de Biologia e declarar a Ciência um monte de mentiras; pelo contrário, os mistérios não resolvidos da mente humana se tornaram ainda mais fascinante para ele, algo ao qual valia a pena dedicar a vida para descobrir seus segredos.

A calma aceitação de Lyall Watson da complexidade insolúvel do cérebro humano me fez pensar sobre os prós de se ter uma fé que não nem sempre se consegue explicar para a satisfação dos que não têm fé. Abraão conseguia confiar que Deus cumpriria Sua promessa de multiplicar a semente de Abraão porque conhecia e amava o Deus que estava por trás daquele comando ultrajante. Quando enfrento problemas no meu relacionamento com Deus e simplesmente não consigo aceitar a maneira que Ele parece estar guiando, a única coisa que me dá força para seguir em frente com o que estou sendo solicitado é o amor que nos une— amor a Deus e pela humanidade. O amor triunfa no que a razão e a lógica não conseguem sustentar. A partir desta perspectiva, a obediência por amor é a coisa certa a fazer, e portanto, a coisa racional.

Além disso, se eu pudesse encontrar uma maneira de explicar cada incidente na Bíblia e anexar documentos para provar cada uma das reivindicações espirituais do Cristianismo, não haveria razão para confiar na força de Deus e investir em conhecê-lO profundamente e envolvê-lO em todos os aspectos da minha vida. Eu teria todas as respostas e não haveria lugar para Deus. Não se trata de me contentar em tatear no escuro para sempre. Jesus tem as respostas, por isso as perguntas me fazem recorrer a Jesus em cada etapa da minha caminhada com Ele, buscando-O e ansiando pelo Seu espírito. Sempre que me deparo com algo para o qual não tenho uma resposta fácil, lembro-me da imperfeição inerente à minha existência humana e minha necessidade de salvação.

Passei a entender que poderia me agarrar à minha fé com uma confiança proveniente de Cristo porque a dificuldade de ter fé na verdade atesta o seu valor. Não há necessidade de fé se todos os aspectos de um sistema de valores é mecânico, simétrico e demonstrável por método científico. Tal sistema de valores certamente seria racional, mas limitado à racionalidade da finita mente humana. O Cristianismo não pretende ser capaz de apresentar aos crentes valores sucintos e doutrinas que se encaixam perfeitamente em ideias preconcebidas. Em vez disso, oferece entrada para um mundo além do que eu atualmente considero racional. Como o teólogo Peter Kreeft diz: “A fé só pode existir em um mundo onde ela é difícil.” Se a fé em Deus fosse facilitada e alterada para apelar aos cinco sentidos, não seria capaz de nos levar Àquele cujos caminhos são mais altos que os nossos caminhos.[2]

[1] Atribuído a Lyall Watson.

[2] Isaias 55:8: “Pois os meus pensamentos não são os pensamentos de vocês, nem os seus caminhos são os meus caminhos”, declara o Senhor.

Why Does God Desire Our Praise?

A compilation

Audio length: 13:15
Download Audio (12.1MB)

Sing to God, sing in praise of his name, extol him who rides on the clouds; rejoice before him—his name is the LORD.—Psalm 68:41
Consummation of joy

C. S. Lewis saw that praising God is the consummation of joy in God. Therefore, when God is pursuing—even demanding—our praise, he is pursuing the consummation of our joy. This may feel at first counter-intuitive—that when we are small and feel insignificant, while God is great and central, at those very moments we reach our highest joy. But it’s not counter to our deepest sense of where joy comes from.

Joy is not in thinking highly of ourselves. Joy reaches its height in moments of self-forgetfulness in the presence of beauty and greatness.—John Piper

*

Think about the things you really love. Praise comes escaping from your lips before you can even think about it. As [C. S.] Lewis puts it, “the world rings with praise.”

Think about a book you recently read you just loved. The words fell off the page like brilliant jewels, and the story captured you from the first page to the last. You can’t wait to sing its praises. You can barely stand not to talk about it, and refer your friends to it.

“I think we delight to praise what we enjoy,” Lewis continues, “because the praise not merely expresses but completes the enjoyment; it is its appointed consummation. It is not out of compliment that lovers keep on telling one another how beautiful they are; the delight is incomplete till it is expressed.”—Amanda Hill
Joy in relationship

Make a joyful noise to the Lord, all the earth! Enter his gates with thanksgiving and his courts with praise! Give thanks to him; bless his name!—Psalm 100:1, 42

*

The Lord honors your coming into His presence with praise and thanksgiving. The Lord loves praise: the High and the Holy One dwells in the praises of His people.3 The fragrance of the Lord is in the perfume of the praises of His children. He likes to smell our praises and our prayers like the fragrance of flowers.

He made all things to glorify Him, and all things were created to praise the Lord. Like a sea of sound, God’s wonderful creation just throbs and pulsates so beautifully in living sound. “All nature sings of Christ our King!” It’s like the very rocks crying out to the Lord, singing His praises. Even the meanest and ugliest little creatures can praise the Lord and sing praises to Jesus. Even the lowliest, most despised creatures can lift up their voice in song. His whole creation praises Him; they all sing His praises!

Even the frogs praise Him. When they all get together, they make a beautiful joyful noise! So even if you’re just a frog, you can do your best for the Lord. Even if you feel like you’re ugly and small and despised, you can still glorify God!

So even if you think you can’t sing, you can lift your voice and praise the Lord! If you can only croak for Jesus, you can at least make a joyful noise unto the Lord! “Let everything that hath breath praise the Lord! Praise ye the Lord!”4—D. B. Berg

*

Worship doesn’t have to be the static recitation of qualities and facts about God, but can be a deliberate and personal relationship with God—and a relationship is naturally more appealing than mandating formalities.

On a lesser scale, I can compare it to praising my wife. Talking about how great she is is nice, and it’s moderately pleasing for both of us. But, it is profoundly more satisfying to speak, even sing, my praises to her. Why talk about her when I can talk with her? Why settle for merely acknowledging the truth when I can live it interactively?

Worship is most naturally relational; it should be the personal and relational recognition of God’s unique glory. And it can be done in everything properly ordered to glorify the Creator. I testify to God’s generous provision by drinking my morning orange juice. I testify to His marvelous creative order when my body heals from a cut. I witness to His gracious love when I forgive other people as He has forgiven me.

Understanding worship like this, it only makes sense to worship God. Why worship God?! Why wouldn’t I!—John Ferrer
Who gets the credit?

It was not their own strong arm that gave them victory. It was your right hand and strong arm and the blinding light from your face that helped them, for you loved them.—Psalm 44:35

*

The challenge is that God is vain because He desires praise. The irony is, that if praise is rational at all, virtually all of it goes properly to God, even the things that we want to take credit for. Because He is the source, to quote James 1, “He is the source of every good and perfect gift.”

If praise is properly deserved, then … it is properly obligatory. In other words, it is not only proper for God to receive praise, we owe it to Him. And in fact, we owe praise to God for the things that we think we ought to be praised for. In fact, what we are doing is we are stealing His credit and taking it for our own…

It’s no wonder then when you reflect on this that the Psalmist writes in Psalm 150:2, “Praise Him for His mighty deeds, praise Him according to His excellent greatness.” We praise God for what He does. We praise Him for who He is. We ascribe worth to Him.—Greg Koukl

*

Is God a megalomaniac ... the transcendent Egotist? Of course not. In the truest sense, this is an arrogant and irresponsible question. How can God be other than he is in his perfection? But in another sense, the question is helpful, for it directs our thinking to the essence of God’s glory and resets our theological framework. God shows his love for us in the display of his glory and in his jealous concern for his own name and reputation. Our greatest joy is found in beholding his glory and in glorifying the triune God for all eternity.

Fallen creatures, blinded by sin, cannot see that to rob God of his glory is to rob ourselves of true joy. It takes the grace of God to make that known to us, and, incredibly enough, God glorifies himself in making himself known to sinners and in saving them through Christ’s perfect atonement for sin. For now, we see the glory of God most perfectly displayed in the cross of Christ.—R. Albert Mohler, Jr.

*

But thou art holy, O thou that inhabitest the praises of Israel.—Psalm 22:3

*

This is God’s work, and if this thing be of God, no man can stand against it. It is not dependent on any man or even any group of us. Don’t for one moment give yourself the credit for one little thing you’ve done, or say, “Look how big we are, and look how we’regrowing!” God is the one who is doing all this, and all we have to do is follow Jesus. Amen? Praise the Lord.

He cannot fail. He cannot deny Himself. Even though we are faithless, yet He remaineth faithful.6 He cannot break His word; He is going to see it through. God is going to carry us through. He has begun a good work in us, and He’s going to complete it to the end.7 … Don’t think you have to complete it. Don’t think, “Well, I know God started this thing, but now we’re going to have to finish it.”

God is the one who wants to get the glory and God is the only one who can do it. Then He wants you to praise and thank Him and glorify Him because He did it. Because if you could do it, you could pat yourself on the back for it and say, “Well, look what we’ve done. Look how great we are. Look how wonderful we’re doing.” Watch out when you talk like that; you’re headed for trouble. You’d better keep saying, “Wow, look what God has done! Look what the Lord is doing. Look how great He’s working.”

Give God all the credit all the time at every turn for every little thing, and He will never fail to continue to prosper you, empower you, protect you, keep you, multiply you, and do all things just like He did for the early church.—D. B. Berg

Published on Anchor October 2016. Read by Gabriel Garcia Valdivieso.
Music by John Listen. http://anchor.tfionline.com/post/why-does-god-desire-our-praise/

1 NIV.
2 ESV.
3 Psalm 22:3.
4 Psalm 150:6.
5 NLT.
6 2 Timothy 2:13.
7 Philippians 1:6.

USA Debt $19.6 Trillion up $1.4 Trillion in one year!

By Simon Black-Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile
It’s official.

The United States government closed out the 2016 fiscal year that ended a few days ago on Friday September 30th with a debt level of $19,573,444,713,936.79. 

That’s an increase of $1,422,827,047,452.46 over last year’s fiscal year close.

Incredible. By the way, that debt growth amounts to roughly 7.5% of the entire US economy. 

By comparison, the Marshall Plan, which completely rebuilt Western Europe after World World II, cost $12 billion back in 1948, or roughly 4.3% of US GDP at the time. 

The initial appropriation for the WPA, perhaps the largest of Roosevelt’s New Deal “make work” programs that employed millions of people, cost 6.7% of US GDP. 

And, more recently, the US $700 billion bank bailout at the beginning of the 2008 financial crisis was the equivalent of 4.8% of GDP. 

So basically these people managed to increase the national debt by a bigger percentage than the cost of the New Deal, Marshall Plan, and 2008 bank bailout. 

What exactly did you get for that money? 

Did they spend $1.4 trillion on achieving world peace, eradicating poverty, saving the planet, or some other pipedream? 

Did they finally fix America’s crumbling infrastructure that has been in desperate need of repair? 

Did they send a gigantic tax refund check to every man, woman, and child in the country? 

Actually the answer is (D), none of the above. They squandered it all. 

In fact, the 2016 fiscal year had the THIRD largest increase in government debt in US history. 

The only two previous times in which the debt increased more than the 2016 fiscal year were during the financial crisis. 

But there was no financial crisis in 2016. 

The government didn’t have to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out the banks. 

All things considered, 2016 was a pretty normal fiscal year for the federal government. There were no major emergencies to drain taxpayer funds. 

Yet they still managed to blow $1.4 trillion because this level of waste and spending is now baked into the system. 

Even if they dramatically slashed spending and got rid of entire departments of the federal government, they would still be hemorrhaging cash at a rate far greater than the economy can now possibly grow. 

Social Security and Medicare are now the largest parts of that financial sinkhole, and according to their own projections, their drain on the budget is growing each year. 

All other government spending COMBINED pales in comparison to Social Security and Medicare. 

So if you add up military spending, homeland security, national parks, and President Obama’s jet, it’s just a fraction of what they spend on Social Security and Medicare. 

These programs consume the vast majority of US tax revenue, forcing the government to borrow mind-boggling amounts of money to fund its operations, even in good times. 

(Just imagine how much the debt will grow when times get tough again.) 

What’s even more crazy is that Social Security and Medicare aren’t even properly funded. Both are rapidly running out of money. 

The programs’ annual trustee reports show that their primary trust funds will become completely depleted starting in the next few years. 

In fact one of Social Security’s major trust funds for Disability Insurance was actually fully depleted last year. 

So even though these programs are already draining taxpayer resources and forcing the government to take on more and more debt, they are in need of a HUGE bailout. 

This leaves precisely ONE option: default… but on whom? 

It’s possible the government could try to borrow the $42 trillion that they calculate is necessary to make these programs solvent again. 

That seems extraordinarily unlikely. 

But even if it were possible to print and/or borrow that much money, it would either create a terminal currency crisis, or force the US government to default on unaffordable interest payments, throwing the financial system into chaos. 

The other option is to simply default on the future beneficiaries of these programs, telling people, “Hey sorry, we wasted all of your money and there’s nothing left.” 

So their choice comes down to either screwing the banks or screwing the taxpayer. 

Gee I wonder which option they’ll pick… 

Until tomorrow, 



Monday, October 3, 2016

Shimon Peres Was No Peacemaker

By Robert Fisk, The Independent, Sept. 30, 2016

Not for the sensitive

When the world heard that Shimon Peres had died, it shouted “Peacemaker!” But when I heard that Peres was dead, I thought of blood and fire and slaughter.

I saw the results: babies torn apart, shrieking refugees, smouldering bodies. It was a place called Qana and most of the 106 bodies–half of them children–now lie beneath the UN camp where they were torn to pieces by Israeli shells in 1996. I had been on a UN aid convoy just outside the south Lebanese village. Those shells swished right over our heads and into the refugees packed below us. It lasted for 17 minutes.

Shimon Peres, standing for election as Israel’s prime minister–a post he inherited when his predecessor Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated–decided to increase his military credentials before polling day by assaulting Lebanon. The joint Nobel Peace Prize holder used as an excuse the firing of Katyusha rockets over the Lebanese border by the Hezbollah. In fact, their rockets were retaliation for the killing of a small Lebanese boy by a booby-trap bomb they suspected had been left by an Israeli patrol. It mattered not.

A few days later, Israeli troops inside Lebanon came under attack close to Qana and retaliated by opening fire into the village. Their first shells hit a cemetery used by Hezbollah; the rest flew directly into the UN Fijian army camp where hundreds of civilians were sheltering. Peres announced that “we did not know that several hundred people were concentrated in that camp. It came to us as a bitter surprise.”

It was a lie. The Israelis had occupied Qana for years after their 1982 invasion, they had video film of the camp, they were even flying a drone over the camp during the 1996 massacre–a fact they denied until a UN soldier gave me his video of the drone, frames from which we published in The Independent. The UN had repeatedly told Israel that the camp was packed with refugees.

This was Peres’s contribution to Lebanese peace. He lost the election and probably never thought much more about Qana. But I never forgot it.

When I reached the UN gates, blood was pouring through them in torrents. I could smell it. It washed over our shoes and stuck to them like glue. There were legs and arms, babies without heads, old men’s heads without bodies. A man’s body was hanging in two pieces in a burning tree. What was left of him was on fire.

On the steps of the barracks, a girl sat holding a man with grey hair, her arm round his shoulder, rocking the corpse back and forth in her arms. His eyes were staring at her. She was keening and weeping and crying, over and over: “My father, my father.” If she is still alive–and there was to be another Qana massacre in the years to come, this time from the Israeli air force–I doubt if the word “peacemaker” will be crossing her lips.

There was a UN enquiry which stated in its bland way that it did not believe the slaughter was an accident. The UN report was accused of being anti-Semitic. Much later, a brave Israeli magazine published an interview with the artillery soldiers who fired at Qana. An officer had referred to the villagers as “just a bunch of Arabs” (‘arabushim’ in Hebrew). “A few Arabushim die, there is no harm in that,” he was quoted as saying. Peres’s chief of staff was almost equally carefree: “I don’t know any other rules of the game, either for the [Israeli] army or for civilians…”

Peres called his Lebanese invasion “Operation Grapes of Wrath”, which–if it wasn’t inspired by John Steinbeck–must have come from the Book of Deuteronomy. “The sword without and terror within,” it says in Chapter 32, “shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of grey hairs.” Could there be a better description of those 17 minutes at Qana?

Yes, of course, Peres changed in later years. They claimed that Ariel Sharon–whose soldiers watched the massacre at Sabra and Chatila camps in 1982 by their Lebanese Christian allies–was also a “peacemaker” when he died. At least he didn’t receive the Nobel Prize.

Peres later became an advocate of a “two state solution”, even as the Jewish colonies on Palestinian land–which he once so fervently supported–continued to grow.

Now we must call him a “peacemaker”. And count, if you can, how often the word “peace” is used in the Peres obituaries over the next few days. Then count how many times the word Qana appears.

Russia: Christians Face Increasing Persecution

By Eric Metaxas, BreakPoint.org, Oct. 1, 2016

We all know about the dire circumstances faced by Christians in the Islamic world. Even the White House has finally called what’s happening to Christians in Iraq and Syria “genocide.”

But there’s another place where religious freedom is under assault: Russia.

This is a surprise to some. After all, post-Soviet Russia takes pride in its Christian heritage. Its president, Vladimir Putin, has positioned himself as a champion of Russian Orthodoxy. His stance on traditional marriage and opposition to homosexual activists has won him praise and admiration from many conservative Christians.

But just ask Donald Ossewaarde if he thinks that Putin and Putin’s Russia are champions of religious freedom. Ossewaarde, a Baptist missionary from the United States, was one of the first people to run afoul of the recently passed “Yarovaya Law.”

The Yarovaya Law, which purports to be a counter-terrorism and public safety measure, prohibits “religious gatherings in unregistered places,” restricts promoting religion on the internet, and makes it easier for Russian officials to deny entry into and departure from the country.

And since the Yarovaya Law places severe restrictions on evangelization (or “proselytizing” as the Russian government sees it), it’s not hard to see how a Baptist missionary might get into trouble.

The law defines “missionary work” as “the activity of a religious association, aimed at disseminating information about its beliefs among people who are not participants (members, followers) in that religious association, with the purpose of involving these people as participants (members, followers).”

Activity that falls under this definition may “only be performed ‘without hindrance’ at [designated] churches and other religious sites … [and it is] expressly forbidden to perform missionary activities in private residences.”

Ossewaarde was arrested for holding a Bible study in his home and for posting public notices announcing his Bible study. He was fined 40,000 rubles, roughly $625. And his Russian court-appointed lawyer warned him to accept the fine and leave Moscow. Ossewaarde, however, is appealing his conviction.

Other groups such as Seventh-day Adventists, Mormons, and especially Pentecostals are rightly nervous about what happens next. A leader of Russia’s Pentecostal Union told Forum 18, a Christian Human Rights group based in Oslo, that “the local police officer came to a home where a group of Pentecostals meet each Sunday … [and] with a contented expression he told them: ‘Now they’re adopting the law, I’ll drive you all out of here.’”

Thus the law threatens to be yet another chapter in the century-old story of the persecution of Russian Pentecostals.

It should be clear that the law has little, if anything, to do with defending Christianity and everything to do with Russian nationalism. As author David Aikman told Christianity Today, “The Russian Orthodox church is part of a bulwark of Russian nationalism stirred up by Vladimir Putin … Everything that undermines that action is a real threat, whether that’s evangelical Protestant missionaries or anything else.”

Thing is, Islamists and Hindu nationalists also view uncooperative Christians as a threat to their idea of a “good society.” And while, thankfully, Russia isn’t using violence–at least not yet–the violation of religious freedom is just as real.

Her son killed Amish children 10 years ago. Their families helped her forgive.

By Colby Itkowitz, Washington Post, October 1, 2016

NICKEL MINES, Pa.–A single word in black cursive font hangs above a large double pane window in Terri Roberts’ sun room. It says, “Forgiven.”

The word–and the room itself, a gift built by her Amish neighbors just months after the unimaginable occurred–is a daily reminder of all that she’s lost and all that she’s gained these last 10 years.

The simple, quiet rural life she knew shattered on Oct. 2, 2006 when her oldest son, Charles Carl Roberts IV, walked into a one-room Amish schoolhouse on a clear, unseasonably warm Monday morning. The 32-year-old husband and father of three young children ordered the boys and adults to leave, tied up 10 little girls between the ages of 6 and 13, and shot them, killing five and injuring the others.

Terri Roberts’ husband thought they’d have to move far away. He knew what people thought of parents of mass murderers. He believed they would be ostracized in their community, blamed for not knowing the evil their child was capable of.

But in the hours after the massacre, as Amish parents still waited in a nearby barn for word about whether their daughters had survived, an Amish man named Henry arrived at the Roberts’ home with a message: The families did not see the couple as an enemy. Rather, they saw them as parents who were grieving the loss of their child, too. Henry put his hand on the shoulder of Terri Roberts’ husband, and called him a friend.

The world watched in amazement as, on the day of their son’s funeral, nearly 30 Amish men and women, some the parents of the victims, came to the cemetery and formed a wall to block out media cameras. Parents, whose daughters had died at the hand of their son, approached the couple after the burial and offered condolences for their loss.

Then, just four weeks after the shooting, the couple was invited to meet with all the families in a local fire hall. One mother held Roberts’ gaze as both women’s eyes blurred with tears, she said. They were all grieving; they were all struggling to make sense of the senseless.

But the Amish did more than forgive the couple. They embraced them as part of their community. When Roberts underwent treatment for Stage 4 breast cancer last December, one of the girls who survived the massacre helped clean her home before she returned from the hospital. A large yellow bus arrived at her home around Christmas, and Amish children piled inside to sing her Christmas carols.

“The forgiveness is there, there’s no doubt they forgive,” Roberts said.

Steven Holt, a professor of Amish studies at Elizabethtown College, said that for most people forgiveness and acceptance comes at the end of a long emotional process. But the Amish forgive first, and then every day work through the emotions of it. This “decisional forgiveness” opened a space for Roberts to offer her friendship, which normally in their situation would be uncomfortable, he said.

Ten years later, the Amish families are still consciously deciding to forgive every day. About six miles from the Roberts’ home, down narrow country roads lined with corn stalks and rolling crop fields, the small village of Nickel Mines is visually unchanged, except that where there was once a schoolhouse by the road, there is now just overgrown grass. Many of the school-age children were not yet born, or are too young to remember.

But it’s impossible to forget. In one home, a 16-year-old girl sits immobile in her wheelchair, unable to speak or feed herself. Nearby, a 23-year-old man sits at his kitchen table, also struggling to speak, though for him it’s not because he isn’t physically able. He just can’t find the words to express the emotional pain he’s felt every day for the last 10 years.

Rosanna King was among the youngest in her class that day, only 6 years old. Aaron Esh, Jr., then 13, was the oldest.

Roberts has developed bonds with both of them.

It started at a summer picnic in her sprawling backyard.

It was only nine months after her son’s attack on their children when Roberts invited all the Amish families to her home for a get-together. They all came, including Rosanna.

Roberts, a grandmother, held Rosanna in her arms, rocking her and singing her lullabies.

Several months later, Roberts had all the women back to her home for a tea–a gathering that’s now become an annual tradition. As she played again with Rosanna, she asked the girl’s mother if she might help care for her. In the intervening years, Roberts spent nearly every Thursday evening at the Kings’ farm, bathing and reading and attending to Rosanna until her bedtime. After the first couple of visits, Roberts said, she would cry uncontrollably the entire drive home, overwhelmed by the reality that this little girl was severely handicapped because of her son.

That’s not lost on Rosanna’s father either. There’s never an evening that Roberts is there visiting that Christ King doesn’t think of what her son did, but he said it never changes the goodwill he feels toward her.

Roberts has cut back on her visits because of her illness, and on this Thursday evening, it is King who adjusts the wide-rim black glasses on his daughter’s face and shifts the blanket over her lap. He unhooks her IV to replace the bag of fluids. Rosanna barely moves, staring straight ahead, her mouth agape, exposing a full set of braces, like any other teenage girl.

For King, forgiveness has not come easy. Some parents have mourned the death of their daughters. Others have seen their daughters fully heal. His daughter survived, but he also lost her. Every day he fights back his anger. Every day he has to forgive again.

Sitting in a folding chair, with Rosanna’s hospital bed in view behind him, King speaks slowly, methodically, measuring each word. There are joy-filled moments with their daughter, like when she seems to perk up when he comes in from work. But then there are days when she has seizures or she’s up in the night and can’t be comforted.

“I’ve always said and continue to say we have a lot of hard work to be what the people brag about us to be,” he said.

But, then, he says this of Roberts: “She’s strong enough, has enough of a backbone, to go out and become such a part of the life of a girl that her son tried to kill. She’s so much a part of our routine that there’s something missing when she’s not there. She’s welcome here any time.”

Aaron’s trauma is less visible. Since the morning of the shooting, when he and the other boys ran for help, he’s struggled with crippling anxiety over his guilt that as the oldest boy in the class he didn’t protect the girls. Even when a state trooper assured him there was nothing he could have done, it took a long time for him to forgive himself.

He started overeating, and when he gained weight rapidly, he stopped eating, eventually having to be hospitalized for anorexia.

At the picnic in 2007, Roberts knew Aaron was suffering, which made it all the more moving when at the end of the party he told her he’d had fun.

Since then she’s developed a special affection for Aaron, a quiet, contemplative boy. He traveled with her to Ohio where she gave a talk about her story. In her presence he found his voice, getting up with her to share his experience. But he hasn’t really been able to share since.

Aaron is now a man, tall and lean, yet still boyishly handsome with the same bowl cut hairstyle he had when he was young, his brown hair streaked blond from hours doing construction work in the sun. Sitting in his home one evening, he strains to find the words to articulate what he’s feeling.

“There are still times, especially around this time of year when you think, ‘Why did this have to happen,’ and you have to catch yourself or you can become bitter real quick,” he said. “I don’t know if I’ve had complete peace with it, I don’t know. I think I’m struggling more than I realize and I don’t want to admit it.”

Roberts worries about him, how he internalizes everything. He worries about her, too. He sends her messages letting her know when he’s going away with friends or checking to see how she’s feeling. But he hasn’t seen her in a few months.

“I don’t want her to see me struggling,” he said. “I want to be her friend, but I don’t want to hurt her. Over the past 10 years, she’s been the biggest inspiration to us all, for sure. We all had it tough but I can’t imagine being in her shoes, I just can’t imagine.”

It’s a grey, chilly morning when Roberts, now 65, sits in her sun room sipping tea days before the 10-year anniversary of her son’s massacre.

The walls and shelves in Roberts’s home are like any other proud mother’s, filled with photos of her children and grandchildren. Her oldest son’s engagement photo is still there, as are pictures of him as a boy.

But there’s one small picture frame she’s hidden in a drawer, the only photo she has of her oldest son alone. In it, he’s wearing glasses and a baseball hat, and not looking directly at the camera. She normally has it out on a table in her kitchen, but she hides it away when her Amish friends come over.

They’d just been there for tea Monday. They don’t need to have that in their face, Roberts says.

Nothing about her new reality, about coming to terms with her son’s demons, has been easy. But it would have been unthinkably harder without her Amish friends.

“No one could ever imagine on that day that something like this would be formed from it,” she said. “Because of the response of forgiveness we were able to heal.”

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Sovereign Man: on watching the Presidential debate.

By Simon Black September 27, 2016 Santiago, Chile 

I used to watch wrestling when I was a kid… I come from the age of Hulk Hogan, Ultimate Warrior, and Randy “Macho Man” Savage. 

Huddling close to the television each weekend, my friends and I would cheer for our favorite stars and their signature moves. 

My dad ruined it all one day when I was about 6 years old; he pulled me aside and said casually, “You know it’s all fake, right?” 

I was stunned. It seemed so real… the matches, the hits, the drama. 

Every time Hulk Hogan would be at the point of near-exhaustion, and then rally to victory from the chants and cheers of the crowd, I had believed it all. 

When I actually started paying attention it became obvious that professional wrestling was a farce staged purely for entertainment purposes. 

Funny thing– even though I knew it was fake, I continued to watch wrestling for several more years, until I was probably 10 or 11. It was, after all, still entertaining. 

That’s how I felt last night watching the Presidential debate. 

It was pure entertainment… a guilty pleasure that ranks somewhere between Wrestlemania and stuffed-crust pizza. 

I know a lot of people feel the same way, that debates are meaningless vacuums of intelligent discourse which are simultaneously entertaining and awkward to watch, like witnessing two intoxicated lovers engage in a very public, dramatic breakup. 

Sadly, this is what passes as a critical component of the political process in the most advanced economy in the world. 

I recognize that people feel they have an important choice to make, whether to give the system a deserved enema or maintain the status quo… and that perhaps they’ll glean some insight into the candidates’ agendas by watching the debates. 

In reality you’ll find more substance in a fourteen year old’s Twitter feed. 

There’s no talk of actual plans, metrics, priorities, or details… just a bunch of zingers and platitudes. 

That’s not how things are supposed to work in the real world. 

I run several companies– agriculture, manufacturing, publishing, and now banking, with a total of roughly 350 employees. 

Our management teams lay out concrete plans to the stakeholders articulating the specific goals and vision of each business, how we achieve those objectives, and what specific metrics can measure our performance. 

Plus regular updates report on our progress, any deviations to the plan, and whether or not we are on-time and on-budget. 

This isn’t rocket science or some radically innovative concept. It’s what any competent, ethical business manager does. 

But that’s not how government works, and it’s not how the political system works. 

Whenever I visit the US, people frequently ask me who I’m voting for. 

It came up over dinner on Saturday night in Connecticut with Peter Schiff and his wife Lauren. 

I typically joke that Trump is the only qualified candidate because he’s declared bankruptcy so many times… and with nearly $20 trillion in government debt, you want to have someone in office who knows which paperwork to file. 

But my honest answer is that I don’t vote. 

For starters, it doesn’t actually matter who’s in office. 

The government spends nearly the entirety of the tax revenue it collects just to pay interest on the debt and cover mandatory entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. 

They could literally cut everything we think of as government, from the military to the Internal Revenue Service, and it would barely make an impact. 

Plus, even the government’s own optimistic projections show that the debt will continue to grow at a much faster pace than the economy itself. 

So any choice ultimately leads to the same set of extreme economic consequences. 

But it’s more than that. 

As I explained to my friends, voting only validates a rotten system that has not only abandoned its primary stakeholders, but is now rigged against them. 

Besides, what are we really voting for anyhow? 

People typically cast a ballot for the person they believe will bring the most prosperity. 

But this is ludicrous when you think about it. Can we really expect that some politician thousands of miles away will magically increase our incomes? 

No. WE are the ones who have the most influence to grow our own prosperity. 

From learning new skills to making better investments, starting businesses, cutting taxes… we have nearly unlimited ways to become more prosperous and provide a better life for our families. 

So the truth is that there’s only one viable candidate to make your dreams and ambitions a reality. That’s you.

Until tomorrow,



Simon Black

Founder, SovereignMan.com

Doctor's Experience with the Afterlife

When a neurosurgeon found himself in a coma, he experienced things he never thought possible—a journey to the afterlife.
BY DR. EBEN ALEXANDER


As a neurosurgeon, I did not believe in the phenomenon of near-death experiences. I grew up in a scientific world, the son of a neurosurgeon. I followed my father’s path and became an academic neurosurgeon, teaching at Harvard Medical School and other universities. I understand what happens to the brain when people are near death, and I had always believed there were good scientific explanations for the heavenly out-of-body journeys described by those who narrowly escaped death.

The brain is an astonishingly sophisticated but extremely delicate mechanism. Reduce the amount of oxygen it receives by the smallest amount and it will react. It was no big surprise that people who had undergone severe trauma would return from their experiences with strange stories. But that didn’t mean they had journeyed anywhere real.
Sign up Sign up to our daily newsletter for up to date global news and features.

Although I considered myself a faithful Christian, I was so more in name than in actual belief. I didn’t begrudge those who wanted to believe that Jesus was more than simply a good man who had suffered at the hands of the world. I sympathized deeply with those who wanted to believe that there was a God somewhere out there who loved us unconditionally. In fact, I envied such people the security that those beliefs no doubt provided. But as a scientist, I simply knew better than to believe them myself.

In the fall of 2008, however, after seven days in a coma during which the human part of my brain, the neocortex, was inactivated, I experienced something so profound that it gave me a scientific reason to believe in consciousness after death.

I know how pronouncements like mine sound to skeptics, so I will tell my story with the logic and language of the scientist I am.

Very early one morning four years ago, I awoke with an extremely intense headache. Within hours, my entire cortex—the part of the brain that controls thought and emotion and that in essence makes us human—had shut down. Doctors at Lynchburg General Hospital in Virginia, a hospital where I myself worked as a neurosurgeon, determined that I had somehow contracted a very rare bacterial meningitis that mostly attacks newborns. E. coli bacteria had penetrated my cerebrospinal fluid and were eating my brain.

When I entered the emergency room that morning, my chances of survival in anything beyond a vegetative state were already low. They soon sank to near nonexistent. For seven days I lay in a deep coma, my body unresponsive, my higher-order brain functions totally offline.


Then, on the morning of my seventh day in the hospital, as my doctors weighed whether to discontinue treatment, my eyes popped open.

'You have nothing to fear.' 'There is nothing you can do wrong.' The message flooded me with a vast and crazy sensation of relief.PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY NEWSWEEK; SOURCE: BUENA VISTA IMAGES-GETTY IMAGES

There is no scientific explanation for the fact that while my body lay in coma, my mind—my conscious, inner self—was alive and well. While the neurons of my cortex were stunned to complete inactivity by the bacteria that had attacked them, my brain-free consciousness journeyed to another, larger dimension of the universe: a dimension I’d never dreamed existed and which the old, pre-coma me would have been more than happy to explain was a simple impossibility.

But that dimension—in rough outline, the same one described by countless subjects of near-death experiences and other mystical states—is there. It exists, and what I saw and learned there has placed me quite literally in a new world: a world where we are much more than our brains and bodies, and where death is not the end of consciousness but rather a chapter in a vast, and incalculably positive, journey.

I’m not the first person to have discovered evidence that consciousness exists beyond the body. Brief, wonderful glimpses of this realm are as old as human history. But as far as I know, no one before me has ever traveled to this dimension (a) while their cortex was completely shut down, and (b) while their body was under minute medical observation, as mine was for the full seven days of my coma.

All the chief arguments against near-death experiences suggest that these experiences are the results of minimal, transient, or partial malfunctioning of the cortex. My near-death experience, however, took place not while my cortex was malfunctioning, but while it was simply off. This is clear from the severity and duration of my meningitis, and from the global cortical involvement documented by CT scans and neurological examinations. According to current medical understanding of the brain and mind, there is absolutely no way that I could have experienced even a dim and limited consciousness during my time in the coma, much less the hyper-vivid and completely coherent odyssey I underwent.

It took me months to come to terms with what happened to me. Not just the medical impossibility that I had been conscious during my coma, but—more importantly—the things that happened during that time. Toward the beginning of my adventure, I was in a place of clouds. Big, puffy, pink-white ones that showed up sharply against the deep blue-black sky.

Reliving History: The search for the meaning of the afterlife is as old as humanity itself. Over the years Newsweek has run numerous covers about religion, God, and that search. As Dr. Alexander says, it's unlikely we'll know the answer in our lifetimes, but that doesn't mean we won't keep asking.

Higher than the clouds—immeasurably higher—flocks of transparent, shimmering beings arced across the sky, leaving long, streamerlike lines behind them.

Birds? Angels? These words registered later, when I was writing down my recollections. But neither of these words do justice to the beings themselves, which were quite simply different from anything I have known on this planet. They were more advanced. Higher forms.

A sound, huge and booming like a glorious chant, came down from above, and I wondered if the winged beings were producing it. Again, thinking about it later, it occurred to me that the joy of these creatures, as they soared along, was such that they had to make this noise—that if the joy didn’t come out of them this way then they would simply not otherwise be able to contain it. The sound was palpable and almost material, like a rain that you can feel on your skin but doesn’t get you wet.

Seeing and hearing were not separate in this place where I now was. I could hear the visual beauty of the silvery bodies of those scintillating beings above, and I could see the surging, joyful perfection of what they sang. It seemed that you could not look at or listen to anything in this world without becoming a part of it—without joining with it in some mysterious way. Again, from my present perspective, I would suggest that you couldn’t look at anything in that world at all, for the word “at” itself implies a separation that did not exist there. Everything was distinct, yet everything was also a part of everything else, like the rich and intermingled designs on a Persian carpet ... or a butterfly’s wing.

It gets stranger still. For most of my journey, someone else was with me. A woman. She was young, and I remember what she looked like in complete detail. She had high cheekbones and deep-blue eyes. Golden brown tresses framed her lovely face. When first I saw her, we were riding along together on an intricately patterned surface, which after a moment I recognized as the wing of a butterfly. In fact, millions of butterflies were all around us—vast fluttering waves of them, dipping down into the woods and coming back up around us again. It was a river of life and color, moving through the air. The woman’s outfit was simple, like a peasant’s, but its colors—powder blue, indigo, and pastel orange-peach—had the same overwhelming, super-vivid aliveness that everything else had. She looked at me with a look that, if you saw it for five seconds, would make your whole life up to that point worth living, no matter what had happened in it so far. It was not a romantic look. It was not a look of friendship. It was a look that was somehow beyond all these, beyond all the different compartments of love we have down here on earth. It was something higher, holding all those other kinds of love within itself while at the same time being much bigger than all of them.

Without using any words, she spoke to me. The message went through me like a wind, and I instantly understood that it was true. I knew so in the same way that I knew that the world around us was real—was not some fantasy, passing and insubstantial.

The message had three parts, and if I had to translate them into earthly language, I’d say they ran something like this:

“You are loved and cherished, dearly, forever.”

“You have nothing to fear.”

“There is nothing you can do wrong.”

The message flooded me with a vast and crazy sensation of relief. It was like being handed the rules to a game I’d been playing all my life without ever fully understanding it.

“We will show you many things here,” the woman said, again, without actually using these words but by driving their conceptual essence directly into me. “But eventually, you will go back.”

To this, I had only one question.

Back where?

The universe as I experienced it in my coma is ... the same one that both Einstein and Jesus were speaking of in their (very) different ways.ED MORRIS / GETTY IMAGES

A warm wind blew through, like the kind that spring up on the most perfect summer days, tossing the leaves of the trees and flowing past like heavenly water. A divine breeze. It changed everything, shifting the world around me into an even higher octave, a higher vibration.

Although I still had little language function, at least as we think of it on earth, I began wordlessly putting questions to this wind, and to the divine being that I sensed at work behind or within it.

Where is this place?

Who am I?

Why am I here?

Each time I silently put one of these questions out, the answer came instantly in an explosion of light, color, love, and beauty that blew through me like a crashing wave. What was important about these blasts was that they didn’t simply silence my questions by overwhelming them. They answered them, but in a way that bypassed language. Thoughts entered me directly. But it wasn’t thought like we experience on earth. It wasn’t vague, immaterial, or abstract. These thoughts were solid and immediate—hotter than fire and wetter than water—and as I received them I was able to instantly and effortlessly understand concepts that would have taken me years to fully grasp in my earthly life.

I continued moving forward and found myself entering an immense void, completely dark, infinite in size, yet also infinitely comforting. Pitch-black as it was, it was also brimming over with light: a light that seemed to come from a brilliant orb that I now sensed near me. The orb was a kind of “interpreter” between me and this vast presence surrounding me. It was as if I were being born into a larger world, and the universe itself was like a giant cosmic womb, and the orb (which I sensed was somehow connected with, or even identical to, the woman on the butterfly wing) was guiding me through it.

Later, when I was back, I found a quotation by the 17th-century Christian poet Henry Vaughan that came close to describing this magical place, this vast, inky-black core that was the home of the Divine itself.

“There is, some say, in God a deep but dazzling darkness ...”

That was it exactly: an inky darkness that was also full to brimming with light.

I know full well how extraordinary, how frankly unbelievable, all this sounds. Had someone—even a doctor—told me a story like this in the old days, I would have been quite certain that they were under the spell of some delusion. But what happened to me was, far from being delusional, as real or more real than any event in my life. That includes my wedding day and the birth of my two sons.

What happened to me demands explanation.

Modern physics tells us that the universe is a unity—that it is undivided. Though we seem to live in a world of separation and difference, physics tells us that beneath the surface, every object and event in the universe is completely woven up with every other object and event. There is no true separation.

Before my experience these ideas were abstractions. Today they are realities. Not only is the universe defined by unity, it is also—I now know—defined by love. The universe as I experienced it in my coma is—I have come to see with both shock and joy—the same one that both Einstein and Jesus were speaking of in their (very) different ways.

I’ve spent decades as a neurosurgeon at some of the most prestigious medical institutions in our country. I know that many of my peers hold—as I myself did—to the theory that the brain, and in particular the cortex, generates consciousness and that we live in a universe devoid of any kind of emotion, much less the unconditional love that I now know God and the universe have toward us. But that belief, that theory, now lies broken at our feet. What happened to me destroyed it, and I intend to spend the rest of my life investigating the true nature of consciousness and making the fact that we are more, much more, than our physical brains as clear as I can, both to my fellow scientists and to people at large.

I don’t expect this to be an easy task, for the reasons I described above. When the castle of an old scientific theory begins to show fault lines, no one wants to pay attention at first. The old castle simply took too much work to build in the first place, and if it falls, an entirely new one will have to be constructed in its place.

I learned this firsthand after I was well enough to get back out into the world and talk to others—people, that is, other than my long-suffering wife, Holley, and our two sons—about what had happened to me. The looks of polite disbelief, especially among my medical friends, soon made me realize what a task I would have getting people to understand the enormity of what I had seen and experienced that week while my brain was down.

One of the few places I didn’t have trouble getting my story across was a place I’d seen fairly little of before my experience: church. The first time I entered a church after my coma, I saw everything with fresh eyes. The colors of the stained-glass windows recalled the luminous beauty of the landscapes I’d seen in the world above. The deep bass notes of the organ reminded me of how thoughts and emotions in that world are like waves that move through you. And, most important, a painting of Jesus breaking bread with his disciples evoked the message that lay at the very heart of my journey: that we are loved and accepted unconditionally by a God even more grand and unfathomably glorious than the one I’d learned of as a child in Sunday school.

Today many believe that the living spiritual truths of religion have lost their power, and that science, not faith, is the road to truth. Before my experience I strongly suspected that this was the case myself.

But I now understand that such a view is far too simple. The plain fact is that the materialist picture of the body and brain as the producers, rather than the vehicles, of human consciousness is doomed. In its place a new view of mind and body will emerge, and in fact is emerging already. This view is scientific and spiritual in equal measure and will value what the greatest scientists of history themselves always valued above all: truth.

Proof of Heaven by Eben Alexander, M.D. To be published by Simon & Schuster, Inc.. Copyright (c) 2012 by Eben Alexander III, M.D.

This new picture of reality will take a long time to put together. It won’t be finished in my time, or even, I suspect, my sons’ either. In fact, reality is too vast, too complex, and too irreducibly mysterious for a full picture of it ever to be absolutely complete. But in essence, it will show the universe as evolving, multi-dimensional, and known down to its every last atom by a God who cares for us even more deeply and fiercely than any parent ever loved their child.

I’m still a doctor, and still a man of science every bit as much as I was before I had my experience. But on a deep level I’m very different from the person I was before, because I’ve caught a glimpse of this emerging picture of reality. And you can believe me when I tell you that it will be worth every bit of the work it will take us, and those who come after us, to get it right.

Walking Fends Off Disability, And It’s Not Too Late To Start

Katherine Hobson, NPR, September 26, 2016

People who have reached their later years may think it’s primarily a time to relax, not to increase their physical activity. Not so. Previous research has suggested that exercise can improve memory and reverse muscle loss in older adults, among other benefits. And a study out Monday finds that a regular program of physical activity reduces the time spent with mobility-limiting disability.

Researchers took more than 1,600 sedentary people between 70 and 89 years old who had some functional limitations, but who could walk about a quarter of a mile in 15 minutes or less, unassisted by another person or a walker. (Canes were OK.)

Half of the participants got a health education program involving regular in-person sessions and some stretching exercises, while the other group was told to aim for 150 minutes of aerobic activity as well as strength, flexibility and balance training both at the study’s facilities and at home. “Walking was the cornerstone of the program,” says Thomas Gill, a professor of geriatrics at the Yale School of Medicine and an author of the study, which appears in Annals of Internal Medicine.

The study followed participants for about 2.7 years, and found that the physical activity program cut the amount of time that people spent with a “major mobility disability”–defined as being unable to walk a quarter mile–by 25 percent compared to the education program. Previous findings from the same study showed that the exercise program lowered the risk of becoming disabled in the first place; this one showed that it sped recovery from an episode of disability and lowered the risk of subsequent episodes.

“They’ve done a really nice job of showing the incredible power of physical activity,” says Bradley Cardinal, a professor of kinesiology at Oregon State University who wasn’t involved with the study. “It’s the secret ingredient to successful aging in terms of quality of life.” An editorial accompanying the study, by the University of California, San Francisco’s Patricia Katz and the University of South Carolina’s Russell Pate, also noted that people who engage in physical activity have a lower risk for heart disease, diabetes, certain cancers, depression, cognitive impairment and functional decline.

The exercise program pretty closely followed the government’s recommendations for all adults, including older ones: 150 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity exercise per week, plus two strength sessions that hit all the major muscle groups.

But most Americans don’t get that much exercise, and that becomes increasingly true as people age. According to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, just 28 percent of those 75 and up meet the recommendation for aerobic activity, and only 8 percent also did the suggested amount of strength training.

Cardinal says older adults need to realize that exercise can greatly improve their quality of life by maximizing function as long as possible. But he says that many believe that older age is for relaxing and that physical activity is somehow dangerous or unnatural. That belief “is pervasive among older adults,” he says, even though for many of them, meeting the minimum requirements “is doable.”

Semantics can help. “We try to frame this as more physical activity than exercise,” says Gill. “We talk with older folks and many say, ‘I can’t exercise, but maybe I can become more physically active.’” Study participants were advised to “start low and go slow,” and some were even able to get rid of their canes after six months of exercise, which Gill says they found particularly rewarding.

There are some basic behavioral strategies for getting yourself to get moving, no matter your age, including giving yourself an incentive to change and engineering your environment to encourage the activity.

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Scanning Software Deciphers Ancient Biblical Scroll

AP, Sept. 21, 2016 JERUSALEM–The charred lump of a 2,000-year-old scroll sat in an Israeli archaeologist’s storeroom for decades, too brittle to open. Now, new imaging technology has revealed what was written inside: the earliest evidence of a biblical text in its standardized form.

The passages from the Book of Leviticus, scholars say, offer the first physical evidence of what has long been believed: that the version of the Hebrew Bible used today goes back 2,000 years.

The discovery, announced in a Science Advances journal article by researchers in Kentucky and Jerusalem on Wednesday, was made using “virtual unwrapping,” a 3D digital analysis of an X-ray scan. Researchers say it is the first time they have been able to read the text of an ancient scroll without having to physically open it.

“You can’t imagine the joy in the lab,” said Pnina Shor of the Israel Antiquities Authority, who participated in the study.

The digital technology, funded by Google and the U.S. National Science Foundation, is slated to be released to the public as open source software by the end of next year.

Researchers hope to use the technology to peek inside other ancient documents too fragile to unwrap, like some of the Dead Sea Scrolls and papyrus scrolls carbonized in the Mt. Vesuvius volcano eruption in 79 CE. Researchers believe the technology could also be applied to the fields of forensics, intelligence, and antiquities conservation.

The biblical scroll examined in the study was first discovered by archaeologists in 1970 at Ein Gedi, the site of an ancient Jewish community near the Dead Sea. Inside the ancient synagogue’s ark, archaeologists found lumps of scroll fragments.

The synagogue was destroyed in an ancient fire, charring the scrolls. The dry climate of the area kept them preserved, but when archaeologists touched them, the scrolls would begin to disintegrate. So the charred logs were shelved for nearly half a century, with no one knowing what was written inside.

Last year, Yosef Porath, the archaeologist who excavated at Ein Gedi in 1970, walked into the Israel Antiquities Authority’s Dead Sea Scrolls preservation lab in Jerusalem with boxes of the charcoal chunks. The lab has been creating hi-resolution images of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the earliest copies of biblical texts ever discovered, and he asked researchers to scan the burned scrolls.

“I looked at him and said, ‘you must be joking,’” said Shor, who heads the lab.

She agreed, and a number of burned scrolls were scanned using X-ray-based micro-computed tomography, a 3D version of the CT scans hospitals use to create images of internal body parts. The images were then sent to William Brent Seales, a researcher in the computer science department of the University of Kentucky. Only one of the scrolls could be deciphered.

Using the “virtual unwrapping” technology, he and his team painstakingly captured the three-dimensional shape of the scroll’s layers, using a digital triangulated surface mesh to make a virtual rendering of the parts they suspected contained text. They then searched for pixels that could signify ink made with a dense material like iron or lead. The researchers then used computer modeling to virtually flatten the scroll, to be able to read a few columns of text inside.

“Not only were you seeing writing, but it was readable,” said Seales. “At that point we were absolutely jubilant.”

The researchers say it is the first time a biblical scroll has been discovered in an ancient synagogue’s holy ark, where it would have been stored for prayers, and not in desert caves like the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The discovery holds great significance for scholars’ understanding of the development of the Hebrew Bible, researchers say.

The text discovered in the charred Ein Gedi scroll is “100 percent identical” to the version of the Book of Leviticus that has been in use for centuries, said Dead Sea Scroll scholar Emmanuel Tov from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, who participated in the study.

“This is quite amazing for us,” he said. “In 2,000 years, this text has not changed.”

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith