Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

I Owe It All to Community College

By Tom Hanks, NY Times, Jan. 14, 2015

In 1974, I graduated from Skyline High School in Oakland, Calif., an underachieving student with lousy SAT scores. Allowed to send my results to three colleges, I chose M.I.T. and Villanova, knowing such fine schools would never accept a student like me but hoping they’d toss some car stickers my way for taking a shot. I couldn’t afford tuition for college anyway. I sent my final set of stats to Chabot, a community college in nearby Hayward, Calif., which, because it accepted everyone and was free, would be my alma mater.

For thousands of commuting students, Chabot was our Columbia, Annapolis, even our Sorbonne, offering courses in physics, stenography, auto mechanics, certified public accounting, foreign languages, journalism—name the art or science, the subject or trade, and it was probably in the catalog. The college had a nursing program that churned out graduates, sports teams that funneled athletes to big-time programs, and parking for a few thousand cars—all free but for the effort and the cost of used textbooks.

Classmates included veterans back from Vietnam, women of every marital and maternal status returning to school, middle-aged men wanting to improve their employment prospects and paychecks. We could get our general education requirements out of the way at Chabot—credits we could transfer to a university—which made those two years an invaluable head start. I was able to go on to the State University in Sacramento (at $95 a semester, just barely affordable) and study no other subject but my major, theater arts. (After a year there I moved on, enrolling in a little thing called the School of Hard Knocks, a.k.a. Life.)

By some fluke of the punch-card computer era, I made Chabot’s dean’s list taking classes I loved (oral interpretation), classes I loathed (health, a requirement), classes I aced (film as art—like Jean Renoir’s “Golden Coach” and Luis Buñuel’s “Simon of the Desert”), and classes I dropped after the first hour (astronomy, because it was all math). I nearly failed zoology, killing my fruit flies by neglect, but got lucky in an English course, “The College Reading Experience.”

A public speaking class was unforgettable for a couple of reasons. First, the assignments forced us to get over our self-consciousness. Second, another student was a stewardess, as flight attendants called themselves in the ‘70s. She was studying communications and was gorgeous. She lived not far from me, and when my VW threw a rod and was in the shop for a week, she offered me a lift to class. I rode shotgun that Monday-Wednesday-Friday totally tongue-tied. Communicating with her one on one was the antithesis of public speaking.

Classes I took at Chabot have rippled through my professional pond. I produced the HBO mini-series “John Adams” with an outline format I learned from a pipe-smoking historian, James Coovelis, whose lectures were riveting. Mary Lou Fitzgerald’s Studies in Shakespeare taught me how the five-act structures of “Richard III,” “The Tempest” and “Othello” focused their themes.

In Herb Kennedy’s Drama in Performance, I read plays like “The Hot L Baltimore” and “Desire Under the Elms,” then saw their productions. I got to see the plays he taught, through student rush tickets at the American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco and the Berkeley Repertory Theater. Those plays filled my head with expanded dreams. I got an A.

Of course, I goofed off between classes eating French fries and looking at girls; such are the pleasures, too, of schools that cost thousands of bucks a semester. Some hours I idled away in the huge library that anchored Chabot’s oval quad. It’s where I first read The New York Times, frustrated by its lack of comics.

If Chabot’s library still has its collection of vinyl records, you will find my name repeatedly on the takeout slip of Jason Robards’s performance of the monologues of Eugene O’Neill. On Side B he was Hickey, from “The Iceman Cometh,” a recording I listened to 20 times at least. When I worked with Mr. Robards on the 1993 film “Philadelphia,” he confessed to recording those monologues at 10 in the morning after lots and lots of coffee.

President Obama hopes to make two years of free community college accessible for up to nine million Americans. I’m guessing the new Congress will squawk at the $60 billion price tag, but I hope the idea sticks, because more veterans, from Iraq and Afghanistan this time, as well as another generation of mothers, single parents and workers who have been out of the job market, need lower obstacles between now and the next chapter of their lives. High school graduates without the finances for a higher education can postpone taking on big loans and maybe luck into the class that will redefine their life’s work. Many lives will be changed.

Chabot College is still in Hayward, though Mr. Coovelis, Ms. Fitzgerald and Mr. Kennedy are no longer there. I drove past the campus a few years ago with one of my kids and summed up my two years there this way: “That place made me what I am today.”

Europe is becoming a no God zone

By Cristina Odone, Daily Telegraph, 14 Jan 2015

The visitor to London walks past the plaited breads stacked in the window of a Jewish Deli. A passerby wears a hijab. Children in grey uniforms run out of the gates of the Catholic school. The air fills with their cries—and with the peal of bells from the Anglican church.

A snapshot of our capital city, circa 2015. Cherish it, because the odds are it will not survive. The tragedy of the Paris attacks does not stop with the victims murdered by extremists. It spills over into our daily existence. In Europe, many have the courage to proclaim “Je Suis Charlie”, but how many Jews dare show their observance after a kosher grocery store was targeted by Islamist gunmen?

No wonder a poll today shows half of the 250,000 Jews in Britain do not see a future for themselves here; and another shows that 100,000 Jews have left France in the last few years.

But Jews are not alone. In some parts of the world, wearing the label “Christian” also carries a death sentence. Whether executed for the crime of apostasy in Pakistan, or attacked as “kefirs” (infidels) in Mosul, in northern Iraq, Christians are forced to die for their faith in parts of the Middle East.

Nor are Muslims spared the persecution the other Abrahamic religions suffer: in western China and episodically in India, public allegiance to Islam is punishable by death.

In ever-greater swathes of the world, being a believer means embracing martyrdom. “Civilised” countries have failed to defend the persecuted—and in fact have created an atmosphere where the person of faith finds themselves pushed into an intolerable place. The extremists want their blind allegiance or will claim their lives; while the secularists suspect their collusion with hot-head co-religionists.

How much longer will believers dare to stand up and be counted? Soon Europe, even London, the much-vaunted bastion of multiculturalism, will become No God Zones, banning any public display of religiosity. ‘For your own good’, the authorities will tell their pious citizens, “you must carry out your ancient rituals in secret. We cannot vouch for your safety otherwise.” Believers will have to hide their precious religious symbols, and conceal their rites. Like the early Christians in the catacombs, they will lead lives in the shadow.

Two years ago, I wrote No God Zone, an e-book predicting that strident secularism would push religion out of public life in the West. I had under-estimated the dangers to people of faith—the enemies come from two sides, not one. Secularists once sought only a separation between Church and State; today they want to purge all signs of religion from all public space: the staff at Charlie Hebdo said they did not want to hear the bells of Notre Dame mourning their colleagues’ murders. Salman Rushdie weighed in, saying religion, as a “maedieval form of unreason”, is the enemy. Meanwhile, extremists have no truck with the moderates in their own religion—and only vicious hatred for outsiders.

Friday, January 16, 2015

A Little History: Cyrus I Scofield and the Tribulation

http://proliberty.com/observer/20090507.htm
After reviewing Revelation and the Rothschild connection (The IO, April, 2009), it occurred to us that the article was lacking in details connecting Cyrus Scofield to the Rothschilds and the meaning of Tribulation (that is tribulation with a capital T). So, down the rabbit hole we went with Scofield. This character’s life is filled with so many anomalies and obfuscations that he fits a pattern that has been established by an, if you will pardon the pun, "illuminative" research model pioneered by Don Nicoloff. In essence, you can take any political figure of prominence today or in history and trace their lives backwards and you will find that names, dates and places do not add up as they do with most people. Further research into family ties, ship manifests and public records reveals that many people of power and influence were operatives and spies for old money with European allegiances. Scofield, as it turns out, fits this bill.


By Anne Wilder Chamberlain

Don K Preston, in his book, In Flaming Fire (2005), delves deeply into the question of whether or not the tribulation in the letters of the apostle Paul to the Christians at Thessalonica is spelled with a capital "T," as asserted by followers of the Scofield Reference Bible (revised 1917), an annotated King James Version study Bible, edited by Cyrus I Scofield, and published by the Oxford University Press.

The Greek word for tribulation is "thlipsis," which means "persecution." The antithesis to "thlipsis" is "anesis," which means "relief."

Preston points out that 2 Thessalonians 1:1-7 clearly reveals that Paul was writing to a group of living Christian believers suffering persecution (thlipsis) at the hands of their persecutors (the Jewish Church leaders) and he clearly promises these Christians relief (anesis) in their lifetime (v. 7) when Jesus returns. Preston states that either Paul lied to the Thessalonians (his prediction failed and he is therefore a false prophet), or he told them the truth and their persecutors were persecuted (thlipsis) in kind at the coming of Christ (v. 6-8).

Those who claim that Paul was writing to Christians 2000 years hence should try applying that logic to any letter written to themselves by any missionary or teacher sending a message of hope to them.

Preston states that Jesus came "in flaming fire" as a spiritual force of retribution at the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, just as God had at its prior destruction as described in Isaiah 2:10, 19, and 21, and 4:2, which Paul quotes in his first letter to the Thessalonians (2:15-17).

Who first taught pretribulation rapture?

Dave MacPherson, author of the book The Rapture Plot (2005) and Ed Tarkowski, a Christian essayist, trace the origin of pretribulation rapture. From the early Church fathers until the Reformation, the generally accepted view of Bible prophecy was "linear historic," that Revelation was in the process of being fulfilled throughout the Christian era. But in the 16th century, a new view of Bible prophecy was devised by a Jesuit priest to stop the Reformers from teaching that the Catholic Church was probably the "whore of Babylon" of Revelation 17:3-6.

In 1591 AD, the Jesuit Ribera invented a "futurist" view. He claimed that Revelation would not be fulfilled until the end of the Christian Era. Ribera taught of a rebuilt Babylon, a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem and an end-time Antichrist, near the end of the age of the "three and a half years" when the books of Daniel and Revelation would be fulfilled. The Antichrist would be a person to rise in the future. He also brought forth the idea of a rapture, but not at the beginning or end of Daniel’s "70th week" (see Revelation and the Rothschild connection). He wrote that the Church would be taken to heaven 45 days before the end of the three and a half years.

In 1767, a Chilean-born Catholic Priest, Manuel de Lacunza y Diaz came to Imola, Italy, when the Jesuits were expelled from Spain because of their brutality. There he claimed to be a converted Jew named Rabbi Juan Jushafat Ben-Ezra. Under that alias, he wrote a 900 page book titled, The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty. Lacunza theorized that the Church would be taken to be with the Lord to escape the reign of Antichrist in the last 3-1/2 years of the age, some 45 days before Jesus’ final return to Earth. During that 45 days (while the Church was in heaven), God would pour out His wrath upon the wicked remaining on Earth.

In 1828, "Glory and Majesty" was translated into English by a radical cultist London preacher named Edward Irving. Lacunza’s views could have died there, for most in England saw Irving as a heretic.

At the same time Margaret MacDonald from Port Glasgow, Scotland, claimed she received divine revelations from God about a rapture. According to MacPherson, Miss Margaret had occultic ties, including a friendship with a girl who was into psychic powers and automatic writing. She sent her vision in a letter to Irving and, shortly thereafter, her revelation showed up in print. In September, 1830, The Morning Watch, a periodical put out by Irving’s church, published, "Commentary on the Epistles to the Seven Churches in the Apocalypse."(1)

According to James Whisler (2), the MacDonald clan was intimately associated with the Knights Templar - Margaret’s hometown being in one of the main areas that the Templars sailed to and settled in when they left France. He added, these "Satanic bloodlines" often chose the Christian religion as a cover to hide their origins and their true religion.

About the same time as Margaret Macdonald’s vision, John Nelson Darby was playing with the dispensationalist idea of dividing history into ages or "dispensations." Many prophecy teachers of today credit John Darby with the origin of these teachings because he was a well-educated man who authored many books. In fact, Darby went to see Margaret and her family shortly after she gained notoriety for her vision, and in later years, claimed them as his own.

With financial backing, the "vision" spread

Darby then headed out, promoting, improvising and adding to his new doctrine. He came to America several times and traveled all across the country to preach dispensation. As "luck" would have it, there always seemed to be wealthy benefactors nearby. This included men like eccentric banker Henry Drummond, who was involved from the beginning, making his resources available to Irving’s church in London and continuing to support the movement. Researcher Robert L. Pierce noted "…Darby’s unusual mobility, for his day and time and his seeming lack of financial problems."

On at least one occasion Darby went to Saint Louis and met with Presbyterian minister James H. Brookes (1830-1897), Scofield’s mentor and a key leader in the Niagara Bible Conferences. The conferences were held annually from 1876 to 1897, initially in different resort locations around the U.S. and, as of 1883 at Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario—the Queen’s Royal Hotel. It was there that the fundamentalist movement was born and solidified. It then began to shape the Christian landscape in the United States and laid the foundation for "Premillennialism," the foundation for Christian Zionists.

The conferences attracted some of the most well known Christian leaders of the time, including D. L. Moody, a world known evangelist who founded the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA), the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago, and the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (BIOLA). Cyrus Scofield’s financiers knew that if Scofield could be moved into those organizations, the dispensationalist doctrine could be spread faster and further into the Christian community.

"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." -- Matthew 7:20

At the outbreak of the American Civil War, Cyrus I. Scofield (1843-1921), a Michigan native, lied about his age in order to enlist in the Confederate Army in 1861, where he served in the 7th Tennessee infantry for a year.

In 1866 he married a Roman Catholic girl named Leontine Cerre. They had two girls, Abigail and Helene.

According to sweetliberty.org (3), as a young con-artist in Kansas after the Civil War, Scofield met up with John J. Ingalls, an aging Jewish lawyer/senator. Pulling strings both in Kansas and with his compatriots back east, Ingalls assisted Scofield in gaining admission to the Bar and procured his appointment as the federal attorney for Kansas. Scofield committed perjury when he took his oath, stating that he had never voluntarily borne arms against the United States. He was forced to resign after six months because of questionable financial transactions.

By 1877, Scofield was making a living on swindles and schemes and writing bogus checks. Ingalls and Scofield became partners in a railroad scam which led to Scofield serving time for criminal forgery.

In 1879, while he was in prison, a group of Christian women who had a jail ministry witnessed to Scofield and he made a profession of faith in Christ. He then began to study the writings of John Darby and embraced Darby’s theology about the rapture and the need for Jews to resettle the land of Israel

Upon his release from the prison, Scofield began to work in the evangelical campaign of D. L. Moody. In 1879, Scofield became acting secretary of the YMCA and was licensed to preach in 1880. (4)

Torell (3) stated he believes that Ingalls informed his Jewish peers that Scofield would be the perfect candidate to develop and penetrate fundamental Christian churches and denominations. All it would take was the right "handlers" and cash.

At this time Scofield "happened to be in the one city" singled out by Darby for "planting the seed" of his "special brand of Bible teaching," and they met.

Then on November 6, 1879, a criminal case against Scofield was dismissed in an Appeals Court.

In 1877, Scofield had deserted his first wife and his two daughters and left them destitute. According Wikipedia, this was "perhaps because of alcoholism," but Joseph Canfield (3) asserts: "The very sudden quashing of the criminal charges without proper adjudication suggests that Scofield’s career was in the hands of someone who had clout never available to either Ingalls, Pomeroy, or anyone of the Choteau Clan. But, the career was to be of such a nature that Leontine, the Catholic wife, had to go."

Scofield then took as his mistress a young girl from the St. Louis Flower Mission. He later abandoned her for Hettie Hall von Wartz whom he married in 1884. Leontine filed for divorce in 1881, finalized in 1883, listing "abandonment" as a reason.

The apostle Paul wrote in 1 Timothy 3:2-4: "A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre….One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity."

Scofield’s supporters kept his background secret for a long time in order to make him a licensed minister of the Gospel. The only biography his life is a collection of "Sunday School" articles by Charles G. Trumbull. Published into a book, The Life Story of C.I. Scofield in 1920 by the Oxford Press, it is the official "white wash" to clean up Scofield for future generations. It contains many inaccuracies, including a "conversion" story that happens, not in jail, but at a law office that did not even exist at the time.

The Scofield Reference Bible

In 1895 Scofield was asked to be a pastor at one of Moody’s churches in Northfield, MA. By now he had built up a "clean" reputation and was ready to be moved there to larger work.

He seemed to have access to money above what he earned as a minister; his backers included New York Jewish lawyer Samuel Untermeyer and Union 76 oil baron Lyman Stewart.

In 1901, Scofield was offered a membership in the Lotus Club of New York, a prestigious club in the literary circles of the United States catering to non-Christians. This was a club in which one had to be invited and have a sponsor. He settled there and listed it as his residence for the next 20 years. It was here that he presented his ideas for a new Christian Bible concordance, and was taken under the wing of Untermeyer (1858-1941)—a criminal attorney well known for his political connections, bribery and for being a fanatical Zionist agent of the Rothschild banking cartel.

Untermeyer introduced Scofield to numerous Zionist and socialist leaders, including Samuel Gompers, Fiorello LaGuardia, Abraham Straus, Bernard Baruch and Jacob Schiff. These people financed Scofield’s research trips to Oxford and arranged for the publication and distribution of his concordance.

One of Scofield’s first moves in producing his reference Bible was to take a trip to the British Isles for research. He immediately sought out the controversial scholars Westcott and Hort in London. Hailed as Bible scholars, both men were very active in occult rituals. Westcott had formed a secret club called "Hermes," noted for aggressive homosexual activities between its members. In 1851, Hort and Westcott also started the Ghost Society, which was first billed as the study of spiritual events, but in time it became more of a séance group. Its members included Arthur Balfour who, in 1917, bequeathed Palestine to the Rothschilds as "a national home for the Jewish people."

The following passage is from page two of the Introduction to the 1945 edition of the Scofield Bible: "….The discovery of the Sinaitic MS, and the labours in the field of textual criticism of such scholars as…..Westcott and Hort, have cleared the Greek Textus Receptus of minor inaccuracies….."

The comment memorializes Scofield’s reliance on Wescott and Hort and explains Scofield’s justification for tampering with the word of God.

And the reason is…

"Why would a wealthy German Jew like Untermeyer living in America sponsor Scofield and spend money on a man who was working on a new Bible translation and preaching Jesus Christ?" Torell asked.

Jewish leaders long ago recognized the bonanza for them if they could force the teaching of an imminent rapture on Christians and move them to abandon their moral hold on society. Darby was financially supported and Scofield, Darby’s successor, could make this teaching central in all Christian churches. Removal of Christians from politics and public schools would leave the door open for Jewish writers and political leaders to move in and remove the Bible and prayer from public schools and political institutions. The ACLU is a Jewish organization, having only a few Gentiles in it for window dressing, he stated.

In 1907, the International Zionist movement had its "payday" when, after some 120 years they were finally able to have a document produced that would forever change the theology of Christian churches around the world so that, in time, believers in Christ would be transformed into Christian Zionists. Even though they had to "pay good money" to further the cause of fundamentalism, it was worth it to them because the fundamentalists would be led like a bull with a ring in his nose in the direction the Jewish masters wanted them to go.

Forty-one years later, the political state of Israel came into existence. "Without the Scofield Bible, it never would have happened," Torell said.

It is impossible to overstate the influence of Cyrus Scofield on 20th century Christian beliefs. The Scofield Bible is the standard reference work in virtually all Christian ministries and divinity schools. It is singularly responsible for the Christian belief that it is Hebrew Prophecies that describe the pre-Tribulation Second Coming of Jesus, and not, instead, a Zionist vision of a man-made New World Order.



Note: The Scofield rabbit hole is getting deeper...

The progenitor of "dispensationalism" and the "Rapture," Scofield and his Bible have come under scrutiny in recent years by biblical scholars and historians alike. Those researchers question the unlikelihood that Scofield could have penned that literary work, given his propensity to swindle many of his Christian followers and unsuspecting business associates prior to his having been "saved."

Embarking upon the exact research model that revealed the invented genealogies of the "Bush (Scherff)/Walker" clan, the "McCain" (McCann) clan and the "Dunham/Obama/Soetoro families," this author immediately recognized the prototypical obfuscation and deceit that follows those whose life mission is dictated by the international bankers who bribe INS agents, government officials and anyone else likely to stand in their way.

The religious author who sought to create a chronological study of biblical events and prophecies somehow neglected to employ the same standards when documenting the facts behind his own turbulent life. It appears that family members, business associates, and his European handlers left similar blemishes on Scofield’s life chronology, leading this journalist to conclude that his biography is but another fictional account intended to hoodwink the masses.

The absence of the normal, provable details in Cyrus Ingerson Scofield’s biographical history can only be explained by considering that the records, themselves, have likely been "raptured" into oblivion. Fortunately, for those who seek the truth, Scofield left a trail in his wake. And so did his Illuminati handlers. We are hot in this trail. ~Don Nicoloff



Thursday, January 15, 2015

Bill Nye: Teach What Is Observable Fact But Call It Unobservable Evolution

Georgia Purdom by Georgia Purdom

Bill Nye has a knack for entangling observational science with historical science, and his recent Big Think episode “Bill Nye Talks to Dogs and Explores the Lessons of Canine Evolution” is no exception. Nye makes the “startling” statement that all dogs are dogs and then goes on to point out two lessons that can be learned from this fact. First he states that all dogs descended from wolves (or possibly an ancestor to wolves). He then discusses an experiment in which foxes were selected for behaviors that were more dog-like (e.g., friendliness), and in three generations the foxes were much more like dogs. He believes that modern dogs are the result of human-wolf interactions in the past. Then he concludes by saying, “It’s really quite an insight and it’s a result of evolution.”


“Bill Nye Talks to Dogs and Explores the Lessons of Canine Evolution”—Image from
http://bigthink.com/videos/bill-nye-on-the-evolution-of-dogs
Newsflash, Bill—this isn’t evolution! In fact, the study with the foxes showed just the opposite. Significant changes can occur in organisms in just a few short years; it doesn’t take eons of time, and those changes don’t result in a change of kind—dogs remain dogs. I’m sure if you asked Nye to define evolution, he would probably give the typical molecules-to-man scenario in which all living things descended from a common ancestor. However, what he described about dogs is speciation and adaptation, not evolution. After all, he said all dogs are dogs! Nye would likely argue that given millions and billions of years, the small changes we observe with speciation (i.e., different species and breeds of dogs) result in the large changes (which we don’t observe) that result in one kind of animal changing into another (i.e., non-dogs to dogs). However, as I have said many times before, time is not the key. The key is a genetic mechanism that can result in the gain of new genetic information leading one kind of animal to evolve into a different kind. I will give Bill all the time he wants, but evolution won’t occur without a mechanism to gain this type of genetic information. All dogs are dogs—always have been and always will be. Observational science confirms the historical science based on God’s Word.

The second lesson that can be learned from dogs according to Bill Nye has to do with reproduction. He gives the example of two domestic dogs of different breeds “interacting” (by this he means sexual interaction) and says, “all you get is a dog. You don’t get any new thing, new species, you just get a dog.” Not terribly earth-shattering, Bill, and once again has absolutely nothing to do with evolution! Although the title of Nye’s new book is Undeniable, referring to evolution, what is really undeniable is speciation and an affirmation of the biblical account of creation. God created all animals according to their kind, and they reproduce according to their kind (Genesis 1). This is exactly what we observe with dogs, as he so deftly points out.

Nye then applies the example of dog “evolution” to humans. He states that when two people of different ethnic backgrounds, like a person from Papua New Guinea and a person from Sweden, produce offspring, “all you get is a human. There’s no new thing you’re going to get. You just get a human.” He concludes his video saying, “So this is a lesson to be learned. There really is, for humankind there’s really no such thing as race. There’s [sic] different tribes but not different races. We’re all one species.” For once, I completely agree with Bill Nye!

According to Genesis, God created two human beings, Adam and Eve, and told them to be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth (Genesis 1:28). Adam called his wife’s name Eve because she was the mother of all the living (Genesis 3:20), and according to Acts 17:26, God “made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth.” It’s clear from Scripture that all humans are one race descended from Adam and Eve, and genetics, including the Human Genome Project, has confirmed the biblical truth that all humans are one race (although there are different people groups that resulted from people migrating to different locations after the Tower of Babel event).

I couldn’t help thinking after I listened to the video that, with a few exceptions, if I hadn’t known who was speaking in the video, I might have thought it was a video produced by Answers in Genesis! Honestly, if Bill Nye wants more people to believe in evolution, then he needs to present data that actually supports it. The problem is, as this video showed, there isn’t any.

Keep fighting the good fight of the faith!

Quer que eu Ore por Você?

http://anchor.tfionline.com/pt/post/quer-que-eu-ore-por-voce/
Tommy Paluchowski

Estava refletindo outro dia na postagem de Maria, “O presente que requer coragem para dar,” escrito no começo deste ano.

Maria disse:

“É orar pessoalmente por aqueles a quem o Senhor me guia. Descobri que se eu estiver aberta para ser um instrumento de Deus dessa forma, Ele vai me guiar àqueles que precisam de oração. Eu simplesmente digo à pessoa, ‘Eu costumo orar pelas pessoas. Tem algo pelo qual você gostaria que eu orasse?’ … Temos muitas oportunidades de nos oferecermos para orar pelas necessidades, cura, salvação, paz de espírito, pelos amados da pessoa, por sua situação financeira, etc. … Orar por alguém é ser atencioso e altruísta.”

Fiquei pensando nisso da perspectiva de alguém que já esteve mais de uma vez do lado de quem recebe tal oferta. Deixe-me explicar.

Você não demoraria muito para perceber que tenho algum tipo de problema ao me conhecer. Minha voz baixa e tremores aleatórios nas mãos denunciam os sintomas do Mal de Parkinson. A maioria das pessoas não demonstra nenhuma reação, pelo menos não abertamente. Mas alguns cristãos sentem-se compelidos a reagir de uma maneira ou de outra. Eu diria que há três tipos de reação:

Primeiro: “Vou orar por você.”

Segundo: “Posso fazer uma oração por você agora?”

Terceiro: “Vamos orar por você um dia desses.”

A maioria das pessoas que tem alguma reação é do primeiro grupo. Conseguem vencer sua timidez e me perguntar qual é o meu problema. Eu explico e elas prometem orar por mim. Eu sempre lhes agradeço e aprecio sua oferta. Por fé sei que vão orar.

Mas francamente, de vez em quando me pergunto se realmente lembram de orar por mim. A julgar pelo meu próprio mau exemplo, há ocasiões em que prometo orar por alguém e sua situação e, apesar de geralmente orar por elas e às vezes até mesmo pedir a outros para orarem, por vezes esqueço completamente.

O segundo grupo é muito menor, mas consiste de homens e mulheres que agem instantaneamente. Assim que sabem qual é o meu problema se oferecem para orar dizendo, “Posso fazer uma oração por você agora?” Depois que concordo, eles então oram ali mesmo, na hora, não importam as circunstâncias.

Isso muitas vezes leva a uma situação bem interessante. Como a vez quando um homem muito mais alto do que eu impôs as mãos na minha cabeça e orou por mim no meio do corredor de um shopping cheio de gente. Com certeza foi algo que chamou a atenção de algumas pessoas. Mas ainda assim, prezo a preocupação e o esforço dessas pessoas.

O terceiro grupo consiste de cristãos que estão ocupados a caminho de algum lugar. Parece que ainda assim sentem-se obrigados a reagir de alguma forma, de modo que dizem coisas do tipo, “Se precisar de oração, venha me ver no escritório. Sou o bispo fulano de tal.”

Um pastor sênior me deu um cartão dele e me aconselhou a entrar em contato com sua secretária para combinar uma reunião em seu escritório para ele poder orar por mim. Eu nunca fui atrás dessas ofertas, pareciam algo muito burocrático. Outro cristão me disse, “Temos que nos ver algum dia para orarmos pela sua situação.” E aquela foi a primeira e a última vez que nos encontramos.

Apesar das respostas a todas essas orações ainda estarem à caminho, tenho certeza que está claro que abordagem me encoraja mais e impacta mais.

As pessoas que pararam para orar por mim bem ali no mesmo instante me marcaram para sempre. Posso não me lembrar exatamente das palavras que usaram nas suas orações e às vezes nem tenho muita certeza se entendi seus nomes direito, mas não acho que vou me esquecer muito rápido de seu entusiasmo e crença sinceros no poder da oração. Isso sem mencionar sua consideração e simpatia por mim—afinal de contas, eu era um estranho para elas. Essas pessoas fizeram o melhor que podiam por mim sendo que não tinham nenhuma obrigação no que me diz respeito. Na minha opinião, elas foram um exemplo do amor de Jesus por mim, demonstrado em suas ações atenciosas—suas orações.

Oração de Ano Novo e Profecias

http://anchor.tfionline.com/pt/post/oracao-de-ano-novo-e-profecias/
Uma compilação

Consagre ao Senhor tudo o que você faz, e os seus planos serão bem sucedidos.—Provérbios 16:3[1]

*

Querido Senhor, por favor, dê à Sua Família em toda a parte um derramamento lindo e especial de Seu espírito este ano. Por favor, fortaleça os compromissos de cada um com o que Você tem para eles; e renove em seus corações a dedicação e o amor por Você, e o desejo de fazer a Sua vontade e reconhecer Você a cada passo deste novo ano. Não importam os obstáculos com os quais se deparem, ajude-os a estarem tão firmes na sua conexão com Você e na sua fé em Você que permanecerão fortes na fé.

Por favor, esteja bem próximo deles de uma maneira especial ao longo deste ano. Renove em cada coração um desejo ardente de permanecer próximo e conectado a Você. Ajude-os a começar a ver uma restauração de algo que foi quebrado e a solução para quaisquer problemas que enfrentaram. Que eles saibam pelo Seu Espírito que Você vai lhes trazer uma grande renovação na vida. Mostre-lhes que há muitas vitórias pela frente, que grandes coisas foram prometidas a cada um de nós se apenas permanecermos firmes em nossa fé e olharmos para Você em busca de respostas.

Sabemos que se olharmos para Você, Você vai nos fortalecer e inspirar; vai nos dar uma vitória maravilhosa de aparentes derrotas em nossas vidas, e nos permitirá ver a fênix levantando das cinzas numa beleza gloriosa. Mantenha-nos perto de Seus braços, Jesus, e nos console e encoraje com Suas palavras de amor. Amém.—Maria Fontaine

*

Eu estou lhes deixando um presente — a paz de espírito! E a paz que Eu dou não é passageira como a paz que o mundo dá. Portanto, não se aflijam e nem tenham medo.—João 14:27[2]

*

Ao passo que este ano vai chegando ao fim, receba a Minha paz. Isto ainda é o que você mais precisa, e eu, seu Príncipe da Paz, anseio derramar a Mim mesmo para satisfazer esta necessidade. Minha abundância e seu vazio se encaixam perfeitamente. Eu o criei de modo a não ser suficiente em si mesmo. Eu o criei como um vaso de barro, separado para uso sagrado.[3] Quero que seja cheio do Meu próprio ser, permeado com paz.

Venha a Mim com um espírito fácil de ser ensinado, ávido para mudar. Caminhar próximo a Mim significa uma vida de constante novidade. Não se prenda aos velhos caminhos ao entrar neste novo ano. Pelo contrário, busque a Minha face com uma mente aberta, sabendo que sua jornada Comigo envolve ser transformado pela renovação de seu entendimento.[4] Ao focar seus pensamentos em Mim, esteja ciente de que estou totalmente atento a você. Eu o vejo com um olhar fixo, porque Minha concentração é infinita. Eu o conheço e entendo totalmente; Meus pensamentos o abraçam em um amor eterno. Eu também conheço os planos que tenho para você: planos de fazê-lo prosperar e não de causar dano, planos de dar-lhes esperança e um futuro.[5] Entregue-se totalmente à esta aventura de estar cada vez mais atento à Minha presença.—Jesus, falando em profecia[6]

*

Sei em quem tenho crido e estou bem certo de que ele é poderoso para guardar o meu depósito até aquele dia.—2 Timóteo 1:12[7]

*

Meus queridos amigos, parabéns! Vocês talvez se perguntem: "Parabéns pelo quê?" Eu lhes dou os parabéns pela sua fidelidade a Mim durante o ano que passou. Foi uma realização e tanto. Sei que passaram por muitos desafios e que cada um de vocês teve que tomar muitas decisões.

Este ano que passou foi um bom ano, um ano frutífero, um ano próspero. Eu guardei e protegi vocês e supri suas necessidades. As boas novas da Minha salvação foi disseminada e muitos foram alcançados com o evangelho. Mas, apesar de todas as vitórias sei que houve muitos sacrifícios pessoais da parte de cada um de vocês. Cada um de vocês teve que decidir abrir mão dos pesos e pecados que os prendiam. Tiveram que estar dispostos a permitir que a Minha luz brilhasse em seu coração.

Dou parabéns a cada um de vocês pela sua fé e confiança. Vocês puseram a sua mão na Minha, e agora não têm que se preocupar, pois Eu os guiarei. Tal como os mantive sãos e salvos no ano que passou, assim os guiarei neste próximo ano de sua vida.

Se passaram por águas profundas ou momentos de provações no ano que passou, que não se preocupem nem temam o que este novo ano lhes reserva. Não lhes darei mais do que conseguem suportar. Se tiverem verdadeiramente posto sua vida nas Minhas mãos, Eu os guiarei por um caminho frutífero e seguro. Eu os tomarei em Minhas mãos. Saibam que o alicerce da sua fé o manterá firme. Vocês não serão levados nem açoitados pelos ventos ferozes, pois o seu alicerce é sólido. Vocês têm o lastro forte da Minha Palavra que os manterá a cada passo na vida.

No ano que entra, continuarei abençoando e tocando a obra de suas mãos com o Meu Espírito; manterei tudo o que colocarem sob os meus cuidados. Portanto, busquem-Me diligentemente a cada passo, a cada encruzilhada, a cada oportunidade. Eu os orientarei e guiarei. Eu os orientarei dia a dia, passo a passo, a cada momento, se apenas voltarem os olhos para Mim e Me entregarem todos os seus planos.—Jesus, falando em profecia

Publicado no Âncora em janeiro de 2015.


[1] NVI.

[2] BV.

[3] 2 Coríntios 4:7.

[4] Romanos 12:2.

[5] Jeremias 29:11.

[6] Sarah Young, Jesus Calling (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010).

[7] NVI.

If I Were to Start My Life Again

http://anchor.tfionline.com/post/if-i-were-start-my-life-again/
By Christina Vernier

Toward the end of the year, as I review the year and set new goals, at times I think, “If I were to start my life again, what changes would I make?”
Love at the center

If I were to start my life again, one of the main goals I’d set is to do everything out of love.

After I got saved 40 years ago, I dedicated my life to the Lord and strove to be willing to do anything He asked of me. I should imagine that I would have become a more loving person. Yet after years of busy Christian service, mostly in the production of Christian literature, I felt that my life often seemed to revolve more around Christian service than love.

It was necessary to translate and produce Christian literature in a difficult Asian language, to help new converts of a totally different culture to understand faith and to ground their belief in the Lord. But I was a young convert and mother as well, and with all the busyness, I didn’t take time to tune into my own spiritual growth, let alone work on personal interaction skills with others. I was businesslike and had a temper. Looking back, I can see that I should have slowed down, taken on less, and cared for people around me a lot more.

I’ve learned that besides having good communion time with the Lord, I needed to make sure I had a daily exchange of wills with Him so that He’d be able to give me the love, joy, and peace that I needed, which I could in turn impart to folks around me. I should have let the Lord carry the load and let Him show me what to do step by step. It reminds me of the Anchor post “The Lamp.” I was burning the wick by relying too much on my own talent and organizational skill. Though I got a lot of work done, my relationship with others needed great improvement.

Well, it’s never too late for love, and the Lord has given me a new start. During the last few years, I have had a chance to start my life all over again. I’ve made a resolution to center my life on love and ask the Lord to check me whenever I’m going too fast spiritually, being businesslike, or starting to develop any attitude that’s not of Him. He’s so faithful. He’s been speaking to me, reminding me every step of the way.

He’s also given me a great victory in helping my actions to be based on love. Love permeates my thinking and attitude, and thus influences my actions. I still have a long way to go, but at least I feel the spirit of work doesn’t have a grip on me anymore. I catch myself thinking, “What can I do to obey the Lord more? What can I do for this person? How will my action or speech affect them?” It’s the beginning of a new life. Thank the Lord!

I do have to make some sacrifices. For example, in yielding to the Lord completely, I don’t always get to do what I’d like to do. At this time, the Lord is calling me to be an assistant to my husband and my son’s family, to put their happiness and ministries before my own. Seeing their faces beaming with happiness and fulfillment is a reward all in itself, not to speak of the peace and joy the Lord is rewarding me with daily.
Physical health

Ever since I was a child, I’ve mainly been into reading books and doing low-impact activities with my friends. After becoming a busy mom and working on translation, etc., I simply put exercising on the back burner.

I’d been working at a desk for 30 years, and due to aging and lack of calcium (as I can’t take in a lot of dairy products), my back developed a condition called “vertebrae degeneration.” I had osteoporosis and easily injured muscles. My body began developing a few other problems as well—possible diabetes, obesity, heart palpitations, and tendonitis. Was the Lord saying something to me? Yes. Besides using my body signals, He spoke to me in prophecy that it was time to get off the chair and do some exercise daily, to keep my “temple” in good shape so that I can enjoy health and long life.1

Seeing the good health my husband and my son enjoyed, all due to faithful exercise, motivated me to change. I might not be able to play basketball or soccer, but at least I could start doing some low-impact exercise such as swimming, aerobics, walking, and dancing.

I’m convicted that by not having developed good exercise habits from the time I was a child, I suffered all these ailments. I’ve been using myself as a dandy bad example to warn young people to build up their health so they can enjoy their lives more. The old adage “health is wealth” is so true.

I’m thankful that during the last few years the Lord has given me a chance to restart. People have commented that I look healthier and more radiant now. I feel much better too. This in turn has improved my mood. I feel more hopeful. As soon as a sad mood starts to set in, I just head out the door for a good walk, and the Lord’s sunshine, fresh air, and fragrant nature floods into my soul and being and chases away the shadows of unhappiness. Thank God!

These are the two areas of my life I am making changes in. Perhaps the Lord will show me more areas to renovate in the future. I pray this little article is a blessing for you, and I pray you’ll enjoy a happy New Year in His service and love!



1 See 1 Corinthians 3:16.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith