Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Like a Tarantino movie: carjacking victim tells of 90 harrowing minutes spent with Tsarnaev brothers

Eric Moskowitz, The Boston Globe, April 26, 2013
The 26-year-old entrepreneur had just pulled his new Mercedes to the curb on Brighton Avenue to answer a text when an old sedan swerved behind him, slamming to a stop. A man in dark clothes got out and approached the passenger window. It was nearly 11pm.

The man rapped on the glass, speaking quickly. Danny, unable to hear him, lowered the window—and the man reached an arm through, unlocked the door, and climbed in, brandishing a silver handgun.

“Don’t be stupid,” he told Danny. He asked if he had followed the news about the previous Monday’s Boston Marathon bombings. Danny had, down to the release of the grainy photos of suspects less than six hours earlier.

“I did that,” said the man, who would later be identified as Tamerlan Tsarnaev. “And I just killed a policeman in Cambridge.”

He ordered Danny to drive—right on Fordham Road, right again on Commonwealth Avenue—the beginning of an achingly slow odyssey in which Danny felt the possibility of death pressing on him like a vice.

Now, Danny—the victim of the Tsarnaev brothers’ much-discussed but previously little-understood carjacking—filled in some of the last missing pieces in the timeline between the murder of MIT police officer Sean Collier, just before 10.30 p.m. on April 18, and the Watertown shoot-out that ended just before 1am. Danny asked that he be identified only by his American nickname.

The story of that night unfolds like a Tarantino movie, bursts of harrowing action laced with dark humor and dialogue absurd for its ordinariness, reminders of just how young the men in the car were. Girls, credit limits for students, the marvels of the Mercedes-Benz ML 350 and the iPhone­ 5, whether anyone still listens to CDs—all were discussed by the two 26-year-olds and the 19-year-old driving around on a Thursday night.

Danny described 90 harrowing minutes, first with the younger brother following in a second car, then with both brothers in the Mercedes, where they openly discussed driving to New York, though Danny could not make out if they were planning another attack. Throughout the ordeal, he did as they asked while silently analysing every threatened command, every overheard snatch of dialogue for clues about where and when they might kill him.

“Death is so close to me,” Danny recalled thinking. His life had until that moment seemed ascendant, from a province in Central China to graduate school at Northeastern University to a Kendall Square start-up.

“I don’t want to die,” he thought. “I have a lot of dreams that haven’t come true yet.”

After a zigzagging trek through Brighton, Watertown, and back to Cambridge, Danny would seize his chance for escape at the Shell Station on Memorial Drive, his break turning on two words—“cash only”—that had rarely seemed so welcome.

When the younger brother, Dzhokhar, was forced to go inside the Shell Food Mart to pay, older brother Tamerlan put his gun in the door pocket to fiddle with a navigation device—letting his guard down briefly after a night on the run. Danny then did what he had been rehearsing in his head. In a flash, he unbuckled his seat belt, opened the door, stepped through, slammed it behind, and sprinted off at an angle that would be a hard shot for any marksman.

“F—-!” he heard Tamerlan say, feeling the rush of a near-miss grab at his back, but the man did not follow. Danny reached the haven of a Mobil station across the street, seeking cover in the supply room, shouting for the clerk to call 911.

His quick-thinking escape, authorities say, allowed police to swiftly track down the Mercedes, abating a possible attack by the brothers on New York City and precipitating a wild shootout in Watertown that would seriously wound one officer, kill Tamerlan, and leave a severely injured Dzhokhar hiding in the neighborhood. He was caught the following night, ending a harrowing week across Greater Boston.

Danny spoke softly but steadily in a 2 ½-hour interview at his Cambridge apartment.

Danny, who offered his account only on the condition that his Chinese name not be revealed, said he does not want attention. But he suspects his full name may come out if and when he testifies against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

“I don’t want to be a famous person talking on the TV,” Danny said, kneading his hands, uncomfortable with the praise he has received from the few friends he has shared the story with, some of whom encouraged him to go public. “I don’t feel like a hero… I was trying to save myself.”

Danny, trained as an engineer, made scrupulous mental notes of street signs and passing details, even as he abided the older Tsarnaev’s command not to study his face.

“Don’t look at me!” Tamerlan shouted at one point. “Do you remember my face?”

“No, no, I don’t remember anything,” he said.

Tamerlan laughed. “It’s like white guys, they look at black guys and think all black guys look the same,” he said. “And maybe you think all white guys look the same.”

“Exactly,” Danny said, though he thought nothing of the sort. It was one of many moments in their mental chess match, Danny playing up his outsider status in America and playing down his wealth—he claimed the car was older than it was, and he understated his lease payments—in a desperate hope of extending his life.

Danny had come to the United States in 2009 for a master’s degree, graduated in January 2012, and returned to China to await a work visa. He came back two months ago, leasing a Mercedes and moving into a high-rise with two Chinese friends while diving into a startup. But he told Tamerlan he was still a student and that he had been here barely a year. It seemed to help that Tamerlan had trouble understanding even Danny’s pronunciation of the word “China.”

“Oh, that’s why your English is not very good,” the brother replied, finally figuring it out. “OK, you’re Chinese … I’m a Muslim.”

“Chinese are very friendly to Muslims!” Danny said. “We are so friendly to Muslims.”

When the ordeal had started, Danny prayed it would be a quick robbery. Tamerlan demanded money, but Danny had just $45 in cash—kept in the armrest—and a wallet full of plastic. Evidently disappointed to get so little out of holding up a $50,000 car, he told Danny to drive. The old sedan followed.

“Relax,” Tamerlan said, when Danny’s nerves made it hard for him to stay in the lane. Danny, recalling the moment, said, “My heart is pounding so fast.”

They lapped Brighton and crossed the Charles River into Watertown, following Arsenal Street. Looking through Danny’s wallet, Tamerlan asked for his ATM code—a friend’s birthdate.

Directed to a quiet neighborhood in East Watertown, Danny pulled up as instructed on an unfamiliar side street. The sedan stopped behind him. A man approached—the skinnier, floppy-haired “Suspect No. 2” in the photos and videos released by investigators earlier that evening—and Tamerlan got out, ordering Danny into the passenger seat, making it clear that if he tried anything he would shoot him. For several minutes, the brothers transferred heavy objects from the smaller car into Danny’s SUV. “Luggage,” Danny thought.

With Tamerlan driving now, Danny in the passenger seat, and Dzhokhar behind Danny, they stopped in Watertown Center so Dzhokhar could withdraw money from the Bank of America ATM using Danny’s card. Danny, shivering from fear but claiming to be cold, asked for his jacket. Guarded by just one brother, Danny wondered if this was his chance, but he saw around him only locked storefronts. A police car drove by, lights off.

Tamerlan agreed to retrieve Danny’s jacket from the back seat. Danny unbuckled, put on the jacket, then tried to buckle the seat belt behind him to make an escape easier. “Don’t do that,” Tamerlan said, studying him. “Don’t be stupid.”

Danny thought about his burgeoning start-up and about a girl he secretly liked in New York. “I think, ‘Oh my god, I have no chance to meet you again,’ ” he recalled.

Dzhokhar was back now. “We both have guns,” Tamerlan said, though Danny had not seen a second weapon. He overheard them speak in a foreign language—“Manhattan” the only intelligible word to him—and then ask in English if Danny’s car could be driven out of state. “What do you mean?” Danny said, confused. “Like New York,” one brother said.

They continued west on Route 20, in the direction of Waltham and Interstate 95, passing a police station. Danny tried to send telepathic messages to the officers inside, imagined dropping and rolling from the moving car.

Tamerlan asked him to turn on and demonstrate the radio. The older brother then quickly flipped through stations, seemingly avoiding the news. He asked if Danny had any CDs. No, he replied, he listens to music on his phone. The tank nearly empty, they stopped at a gas station, but the pumps were closed.

Doubling back, they returned to the Watertown neighbourhood—“Fairfield Street,” Danny saw on the sign—and grabbed a few more things from the parked car, but nothing from the trunk. They put on an instrumental CD that sounded to Danny like a call to prayer.

Suddenly, Danny’s iPhone buzzed. A text from his roommate, wondering in Chinese where he was. Barking at Danny for instructions, Tamerlan used an English-to-Chinese app to text a clunky reply. “I am sick. I am sleeping in a friend’s place tonight.” In a moment, another text, then a call. No one answered. Seconds later, the phone rang again.

“If you say a single word in Chinese, I will kill you right now,” Tamerlan said. Danny understood. His roommate’s boyfriend was on the other end, speaking Mandarin. “I’m sleeping in my friend’s home tonight,” Danny replied in English. “I have to go.”

“Good boy,” Tamerlan said. “Good job.”

The SUV headed for the lights of Soldiers Field Road, banking across River Street to the two open gas stations. Dzhokhar went to fill up using Danny’s credit card, but quickly knocked on the window. “Cash only,” he said, at least at that hour. Tamerlan peeled off $50.

Danny watched Dzhokhar head to the store, struggling to decide if this was his moment—until he stopped thinking about it, and let reflexes kick in.

“I was thinking I must do two things: unfasten my seat belt and open the door and jump out as quick as I can. If I didn’t make it, he would kill me right out, he would kill me right away,” Danny said. “I just did it. I did it very fast, using my left hand and right hand simultaneously to open the door, unfasten my seat belt, jump out … and go.” Danny sprinted between the passenger side of the Mercedes and the pumps and darted into the street, not looking back, drawn to the Mobil station’s lights. “I didn’t know if it was open or not,” he said. “In that moment, I prayed.”

The brothers took off. The clerk, after brief confusion, dialed 911 on a portable phone, bringing it to Danny in the storeroom. The dispatcher told him to take a deep breath. The officers, arriving in minutes, took his story, with Danny noting the car could be tracked by his iPhone and by a Mercedes satellite system, mbrace.

After an hour or more—as the shoot-out and manhunt erupted in Watertown—police brought Danny to Watertown for a “drive-by lineup,” studying faces of detained suspects in the street from the safety of a cruiser. He recognized none of them. He spent the night talking to police and the FBI, appreciating the kindness of a state trooper who gave him a bagel and coffee. At 3 the next afternoon, they dropped Danny back in Cambridge.

“I think, Tamerlan is dead, I feel good, obviously safer. But the younger brother—I don’t know,” Danny recalled thinking, wondering if Dzhokhar would come looking for him. But the police knew the wallet and registration were still in the bullet-riddled Mercedes, and that a wounded Dzhokhar had probably not gotten far. That night, they found him in a boat.

The "Facts" Keep Changing About the Boston Bombings--And It's Fueling a Conspiracy Theory Industry

(DID THE GOVERNMENT HAVE PRIOR INFORMATION THAT A BOMB WAS PLANTED AT THE MARATHON BUT DECIDED NOT TO POSTPONE THE EVENT?) Dennis

By Alex Seitz-Wald, Salon, April 25, 2013

In the aftermath of massive, complicated crimes it’s not uncommon for a bit of crucial information to be immediately put forward by police, only to be contradicted later on. While it’s understandable that initial leads and assertions might end up being wrong in a dynamic situation like the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing, wholesale contradictions can encourage skepticism of the motives of those releasing inaccuracies—as with initial, false reports that Osama bin Laden hid behind his wife when U.S. forces shot him. Another effect of changing details can be to encourage conspiracy theorists who latch onto inconsistencies, and to undermine trust in authorities. (IF AUTHORITIES WANT TRUST THEY NEED TO BE TRUTHFUL)


Now, almost a week after the Tsarnaev brothers fought a rolling street battle with dozens of heavily armed police officers, we learned Wednesday night that they had only a single handgun, according to sources who spoke with ABC News and the AP, something that directly contradicts what officials had previously said.


Here are some of the biggest changes to facts released in this investigation:


•Suspects’ arms—After the manhunt, Boston Police Commissioner Ed Davis said the brothers were “heavily armed” and numerous reports detailed a fairly extensive arsenal. According to a New York Times report from April 21 citing a law enforcement official, “The authorities found an M-4 carbine rifle … two handguns and a BB gun.” Now unnamed sources say there was only a single 9mm pistol between the two brothers. Indeed, photos of the shootout suggest only one brother had a weapon. (MAYBE THE POLICE STARTED SHOOTING AT THEM!)


•Boat gunfight?—Police initially reported that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev fired on police when they found him hiding in a boat Friday night. “It was back and forth … yes—he was firing,” Watertown Police Chief Ed Deveau told CNN Saturday (though the FBI cautioned at the time that only federal authorities had official information). The Washington Post reported that the suspect inside the boat “was shooting back.” But later, the Washington Post and the AP reported yesterday that Tsarnaev was unarmed when police found him after what was described as a gunfight. As it turns out, police may have been spooked by an errant shot, and fired into the boat, but apparently zero shots came out. (THE MAN THAT FOUND HIM SAID HE SEEMED TO BE BADLY INJURED AND UNCONSCIOUS)


•7 -Eleven and the MIT officer—Initial reports suggested the brothers tried to hold up a 7-Eleven, and then killed an MIT officer who either responded to the robbery or just happened to be in the area. But days later, authorities revealed that the holdup was committed by different suspects and the confusion was caused by the close proximity of the two events. It’s still unknown exactly why the brothers killed the police officer. (DO WE KNOW IT WAS THEM?)


•Carjacking—Some reports indicate that the person whom the brothers carjacked escaped while they inexplicably went into a store to buy snacks, while others say the brothers let the victim go because he wasn’t American. It’s also still unclear which brother stole the black SUV, and which drove the Honda that followed.


•Trip to NYC—What the suspects did after the bombing remains a mystery, but one detail that emerged was that they were planning to head to New York City—to party. That’s what New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said yesterday. But today, NBC News reports the brothers discussed trying to detonate a bomb in Times Square, but that the plan was not well developed and “aspirational at most.” (WILL WE EVER KNOW THE TRUTH?)(IT STARTS SOUNDING LIKE DALLAS 1963 ALL OVER AGAIN)

Catholics try their hand at old-fashioned evangelism


Tim Townsend, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Apr 25, 2013
SHREWSBURY, Mo. (RNS) On a recent rainy Saturday, about 125 Catholics packed a basement conference room, many of them older, most of them lay people. Many were representing their parishes.

They gathered here to learn how to spread the faith, a concept that is both fundamental to Christianity and nearly foreign to modern Roman Catholics.

For the first hour of the conference, Kenneth Livengood, a parishioner at Holy Trinity Parish in St. Ann, Mo., detailed one way—door-to-door evangelization, a missionary strategy more familiar to Mormons or Jehovah’s Witnesses.

“We’ve been tricked into thinking faith is a private matter,” Livengood told the audience. “That’s a lie. Faith is meant to be public, and there are many ways to share it.”

He taught them how to form a door-to-door ministry, explained how to divide a boundary map of their parish into geographical sections, suggested useful handouts, gave safety tips, and showed videos that detailed the best way to respond to various reactions from those on the other side of the door.

“Divide up into teams of two,” Livengood said. “One of you can do the talking and the other should be a silent prayer warrior. At the next house, flip your roles.”

Evangelization is central to the Christian mission, but for the average adherent, the physical act of approaching a neighbor, work colleague or family member can be daunting.

A pamphlet produced by the Archdiocese of St. Louis called “Witnessing Christ Door-to-Door” offered a list of suggestions “since this may be a novel, perhaps, intimidating path.”

The suggestions include:

•”Ask each person you meet if they are in need of prayer.”

•”Early Saturday mornings may not make for the most receptive ears.”

•”Trying to provide too many facts about the Church may cause misunderstandings.”

•”Doing a little role-playing before going out for visits may be helpful.”

•”Sometimes a person answering the door thinks getting back to regular Mass attendance would make their grandmothers very happy, which might present a welcoming start for conversation.”

In the final scene of the Gospel of Matthew, the resurrected Christ appears to his disciples and tells them—in what has come to be called the “Great Commission”—to make new disciples by “teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”

Catholics are no less engaged by the Great Commission than evangelicals, but over the last century, the church has relied on evangelizing through the example of its social justice work, relieving those in the pews from having to knock on a neighbor’s door.

In the late 1980s, Pope John Paul II began referring to “the new evangelization” as a strategy of bringing lapsed Catholics in Europe back into the church.

In his book “Crossing the Threshold of Hope,” the pope wrote that evangelization “has never been absent” in the church. He quoted the Apostle Paul from the book of 1 Corinthians: “Woe to me if I do not preach the Gospel!”

Pope Benedict XVI made his predecessor’s “new evangelism” a central theme of his papacy, even convening a monthlong meeting of bishops from around the world last fall to discuss it.

During a speech to his fellow cardinals in Rome last year, New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan called evangelization “the sacred duty,” saying in the words of St. Augustine that it is “ever ancient, ever new.”

“The how of it, the when of it, the where of it, may change,” Dolan said, “but the charge remains constant.”

Many observers have cited Pope Francis’ humble behavior as its own kind of evangelization. Or, to use a phrase attributed to his namesake, St. Francis of Assisi: “Preach the gospel at all times. When necessary, use words.”

Bevans said images of Francis stopping to bless a disabled man during his papal inauguration, or washing the feet of women during Holy Week, were especially powerful.

Julie Bostick, executive director of the St. Louis archdiocese’s office of laity and family life, said the archdiocese would hold another “how to” conference in June, focusing on evangelizing in the family. Another in the fall will tackle evangelizing in the workplace.

“Sometimes people get a little nervous talking about their faith, but spreading the message of Jesus Christ has always been the mission of the church,” she said. “We’re just trying to refocus.”

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Manter a Visão Celestial

Jesus falando em profecia

Manter a visão celestial é como observar por um planetário as realidades colossais, infinitas e magníficas do espaço sideral.

Manter a visão celestial significa focar em Mim acima de tudo, colocar as coisas do espírito acima das da carne. Significa lembrar-se por que assumi a forma humana, sofri e morri por você, para poder remi-lo, compreendê-lo, e perdoar-lhe sempre, curá-lo e protegê-lo.

Significa colocar a Palavra em primeiro lugar em sua vida, acreditar e agir segundo a sua verdade. Significa entrar no templo Comigo cada dia, ter comunhão com o Meu Espírito e se alimentar espiritualmente. Significa clamar as Minhas promessas não importa como se sinta ou quais as circunstâncias no físico.

*

Um atleta em treinamento para se classificar para as Olimpíadas tem que manter essa visão e meta. Ele tem a “visão olímpica”, que o faz aguentar os treinos e exercícios difíceis e exaustivos. Ele não dá importância ao fato de não ter tempo de folga, a fadiga do dia, ou as poucas horas de sono. — Porque aquela meta, a visão, se torna mais importante do que quaisquer dificuldades atuais. Para conseguir sobreviver aos anos de treinamento, a meta tem que ser algo que vai valer a pena para ele — tem de ser tudo para ele. E assim que ele decide que é, precisa lutar para permanecer concentrado naquela meta e manter aquela visão diante de si o tempo todo.

Tem que decidir se vale a pena deixar tudo o mais de lado pela Minha Palavra e as Minhas promessas para o futuro para ganhar esse prêmio. Então, assim que tiver decidido, tem de lutar para manter sua concentração, essa visão perante você!

Muitos de vocês já tomaram essas decisões; mas agora é o período em que têm que ser tenazes e determinados, quando é preciso lutar para não perder o foco.

O que pode fazer na prática para manter a visão celestial?

— Lute para ter o seu tempo no templo Comigo. Esta é a maneira mais eficaz de se renovar com a Minha visão e para não se esquecer da Minha visão celestial.

—Obedeça a Minha Palavra não importa como se sinta.

—Louve-Me regularmente, louve-Me consistentemente.Nada clareia a sua visão mais rápido do que o louvor. O louvor abre seus olhos para a visão celestial para que correr atrás dela, almejá-la e lutar por ela seja muito mais fácil para você. A visão se torna mais real para você, o que faz com que seu desejo de correr atrás dela seja ainda mais forte e efetivo.

*

A visão celestial, como Paulo disse, significa “prosseguir para o alvo, pelo prêmio da soberana vocação de Deus.”[1] Significa fazer da Minha vontade — da Minha soberana vocação — a sua meta e propósito na vida. É tudo pelo que você luta, “corre atrás” e procura — cumprir a Minha vontade, a ponto de considerar isso o prêmio. Não somente um prêmio, mas o prêmio, tudo o que sempre quis fazer na vida!

Tal como Paulo disse, é “a soberana vocação de Deus em Cristo Jesus”. Essas são palavras-chave: “em Cristo Jesus”. Você encontra essa soberana vocação em Mim — ao olhar para Mim, ao viver para Mim. Esta soberana vocação é no final das contas o chamado para viver por Mim. Tudo o que faz na vida está relacionado a Mim, ou seja, você tem que estar olhando para Mim. Tem que manter os olhos em Mim para alcançar a sua meta — Minha meta — para você.

*

Você mantém a visão celestial fazendo as escolhas que o levam para perto de Mim — a linha de chegada, se preferir. É como um corredor na pista: ele só pode ir na direção na qual está olhando. Se estiver com os olhos fixos na linha de chegada, é lá que vai parar. Mas se os seus olhos estiverem em outras trilhas que o distanciam da pista de corrida, não vai alcançar a meta da corrida.

Se quiser manter a visão celestial na sua corrida da vida, concentre-se em Mim, o Autor e Consumador da sua fé, do curso da sua vida. Mantenha a visão permanecendo focado em Mim e tomando apenas as decisões que você sabe que vão levá-lo para uma vida mais plena em Mim.

*

Uma conexão forte Comigo no espírito o ajudará a manter a visão celestial o tempo todo.

Pode fortalecer essa conexão através dos momentos que passa Comigo na Palavra. Você fortalece seu enfoque espiritual ao se concentrar no Meu poder. Ganha este elo mais forte sendo fiel, obediente, e seguindo adiante. Você mantém a visão forte ao ficar mais próximo e íntimo Comigo como seu Marido.

As chaves para manter essa visão são encontradas ao fazer aquelas coisas que o aproximam mais de Mim, que aumentam a sua fé e encorajam o seu espírito; aquilo que os funde ao mundo espiritual e traz o espírito muito mais à tona na sua vida. É assim que você mantém a visão. É assim que se mantém conectado e consegue correr com paciência a carreira que lhe está proposta — e vencer![2]

*

E vi um novo céu, e uma nova terra. Porque já o primeiro céu e a primeira terra passaram, e o mar já não existe.

E eu, João, vi a santa cidade, a nova Jerusalém, que de Deus descia do céu, adereçada como uma esposa ataviada para o seu marido.

E ouvi uma grande voz do céu, que dizia: Eis aqui o tabernáculo de Deus com os homens, pois com eles habitará, e eles serão o seu povo, e o mesmo Deus estará com eles, e será o seu Deus.

E Deus limpará de seus olhos toda a lágrima; e não haverá mais morte, nem pranto, nem clamor, nem dor; porque já as primeiras coisas são passadas.

E o que estava assentado sobre o trono disse: Eis que faço novas todas as coisas. E disse-me: Escreve; porque estas palavras são verdadeiras e fiéis.

E disse-me mais: Está cumprido. Eu sou o Alfa e o Omega, o princípio e o fim. A quem quer que tiver sede, de graça lhe darei da fonte da água da vida.

Quem vencer, herdará todas as coisas; e eu serei seu Deus, e ele será meu filho."—Apocalipse 21:1–7[3]

Publicado originalmente em 2006. Atualizado e republicado em abril.
Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli. Revisão Edson Campos.


[1] Filipenses 3:14.

[2] Hebreus 12:1.

[3] NVI.

Golden Opportunities

By D.Brandt Berg

Download Audio (10.5MB)

When very special opportunities arise, we’ve found from years of experience in the Lord’s work that it's something God does in a special way to reach a special audience that you may not have the opportunity to reach again.—Someone He wants to reach or some particular field of ministry that He wants you to proceed with and pursue and not to forsake too soon.

The primary ministry of all of us is reaching the lost and reaching the people who need the message. It’s more important even to leave the ninety-and-nine and go out and seek the one lost sheep—the ninety-and-nine are safe in the fold.1 There are far more out there who are unsaved and who need salvation and who need the message and the love of the Lord who do not yet know Him and are not yet convicted about serving Him, to whom you can speak and give the message both of His love and His call to service.

So I would not pass up a golden opportunity to reach people who are needy, including the poor rich, who seldom are ministered to by missionaries, particularly missionaries like us with such a simple message of His love. They are also in turn able to provide you more opportunities of service, as well as to help support the Lord’s work.

It’s important not to neglect those golden opportunities which the Lord presents and gives you a foot in the door to pursue. We have found it’s best to go ahead with those things as long as you can, and you’ve at least entered the field and covered as much of it as you can while you can, because you can’t always go back to it. You don’t always have a second chance. Sometimes we’ve thought, “Well, we have something else we’ve got to do in the meantime; we’ll go back to that later”—and we went back later and there had been a change of heart and they had grown cold.

God has certain setups that are golden opportunities, and that kind of opportunity is very rare. You have to have a real sixth sense of the Lord—maybe it’s a seventh sense of the Holy Spirit and His guiding—to recognize such unusual opportunities and to realize that this is something that God has suddenly opened to you, a golden opportunity that must be pursued at once and followed up now or it may never come again and you may never be able to reach those same people again, or that class of people or that type of people in that particular field again.

God has His harvest times, and they don’t always last, because as He said, “The harvest truly is plenteous, but the laborers are few. The field is already white unto harvest.”2 Why is He in such a hurry? Why does He want to get so many laborers into the harvest quickly? Because the harvest won’t last if it’s not reaped when it’s ripe, and then you’ll be sorry.

You may find out when you come back that the harvest has been devastated by some storm of the enemy or some opposition or some freeze of their hearts, and it’s gone and past and you’ll never have it again. So it’s important to try to seize these golden opportunities of harvest time which may come but once, sometimes never again.

God rarely opens doors that He doesn’t want you to enter. When He opens doors like that, it generally means that you’re supposed to enter and follow it up until He closes the door. I have found that He will always let you know, and the time will come when the door will close, if you’ll follow it up at the time and do your best, harvest rapidly while the field is free and open and the harvest is good and the opportunity is golden and the people are receptive and responsive and their hearts are open.

If you wait too long or neglect it or put it off, you may find that the door has closed or God has even allowed it to be closed because you missed the ideal time, the psychological moment, the spiritual moment, God’s golden-harvest moment: His golden opportunity when the harvest is ripe and ready to be reaped.

We say, “I’ll do that when I get back” or “Later.” We procrastinate, we put it off, we postpone it, and we find out when we come back that the whole situation has changed—there are different people in charge who are not interested; the people have lost interest. The whims of man are fleeting, fame is fleeting, and when you’re on that wave of receptivity, you’ve got to ride it as long as it lasts, because it may eventually crash on the beach and go to pieces. But you can ride it while it lasts and you can get the glory of it while it’s going.

I preached almost this same sermon to a little group of 50 hippies in a little club called the Light Club in Huntington Beach a long time ago. I told them, "We’ve got to ride the wave now while it’s here, because it won’t last forever!" And it only lasted a few months, but as a result we became known almost nationwide before it crashed.

I have found that God’s appointments will not be disappointments. But you can disappoint God if you don’t meet His appointment, if you don’t get there and stay there when He wants you to be there. If you set for yourself too rigid a schedule, you may miss something that God is opening up. You may miss some choice field, some ripe harvest, and find out you just cannot get back in again, discovering that things will never be the same again. We must follow up such golden opportunities when we have them and ride the crest of that wave until it breaks on the shore.

This is what we have done many times over the years, and we have ridden the crest of a wave of popularity and receptiveness, a ripe harvest field, and we have reaped it until the Lord shut the door and it was no more.

This reminds me of a marvelous opportunity we had at the 1964-1965 New York World’s Fair, six months of reaching 10,000 people a day with our witness at our little booth there; handing out hundreds of thousands of tracts and pieces of Gospel literature to thousands of people who maybe never heard or never got anything else with a personal sweet witness, smiling happy face of a young person, a kind loving word, and would remember it forever.

Our booth had a beautiful seven-foot-tall picture of Christ, the Prince of Peace. The theme of the fair was peace, and it had a beautiful golden frame with a blue tinge to the picture against this bright orange wall. Blue and orange were the fair colors, so a lot of the news media took pictures of it and marveled at the beauty of our little exhibit, which was the cheapest, smallest one in the whole building. People commented on it, and the manager loved us and loved it.

We had that opportunity only two summers and that was it. We almost didn’t go back the second summer, but the Lord convicted us and gave my mother a vision that we had forsaken our plow.

So we went back and we did what the Lord told us to do. We followed God instead of following our schedule or even some of our own ideas and our own plans and our own personal feelings. It was a marvelous opportunity that only lasted a little while. If we’d failed to go back, it would have been gone forever.

So don’t leave that plow deserted in a fertile field before a ripe harvest which God has opened a door to. Don’t forsake it, and don’t forsake the task God has given you. Don’t abandon something that is fruitful and paying off—as long as you’re reaping and fruitful and getting souls or support or the blessing of the Lord spiritually or in some other way. As long as God is blessing you and making you fruitful and making you a blessing, pursue it and keep after it until it comes to its end. And it generally will end, because harvests don’t last forever, fields are not open forever, doors do not stay open forever. Something closes them in the long run, and the time is gone, the time is past. “The summer is ended, the harvest is past,” the Scripture says, “and yet we are not saved.” They are not saved and the time is gone.3

“There is a time for everything,” God’s Word says. “A time to laugh, a time to weep, a time for peace and a time for war.”4 And there’s a time for each field, a time for each harvest, and we need to get action on the harvest fields when they are “white unto harvest” and ripe and ready, before they rot in the field or are destroyed by the storm or the freeze.

It’s important to go through the open doors and accept the invitations and take advantage of the golden opportunities which may only knock once and be gone forever. The door may only be opened once and then be slammed shut and locked forever afterwards. May God help us never to fail to go through those open doors and take advantage of those marvelous harvest fields which may never be available again.

When things are going strong, that’s the time to keep at it! If Nehemiah had come down to fiddle around with something else then, he might never have finished the wall.5 We have to keep on the job until it’s finished. Do the thing until the time is spent and over and the harvest is harvested and the door is shut and the wave is spent and crashed; then God will let you know when it’s time to go on someplace else and do something else.

“Let every man abide in the calling wherein he is called.”6 When God calls you to a certain ministry, you’ll want to stay in it until you’re finished, and then go on to whatever else God wants you to do.

Don’t pass up those golden opportunities, leaving a plow in the field that may not be there when you get back. The field may not be there either. It may be their last chance. Seize it today!

Originally published October 1980. Updated and republished April 2013.
Read by Simon Peterson.


1 Matthew 18:12.

2 Matthew 9:37; John 4:35.

3 Jeremiah 8:20.

4 Ecclesiastes 3:1–8.

5 Nehemiah 6:3.

6 1 Corinthians 7:20.

Palestinian Christians battle Israel barrier route

By Diaa Hadid, AP, Apr 24, 2013
BEIT JALA, West Bank (AP)—Palestinians in this Christian village are hoping the new pope can succeed where others have failed—pressing Israel to drop plans to build a stretch of its West Bank separation barrier through their picturesque valley.

Since Vatican properties are affected, residents have appealed to the Roman Catholic Church to use more of its significant influence in the Holy Land to reroute the barrier, even as local Catholic leaders hold a special protest Mass in threatened orchards each week.

The Vatican has called on Israel not to seize the lands, but local Palestinian Catholics want the new pontiff to lean more heavily on Israel.

“We have hope in the new pope, as he is close to the poor and the oppressed,” said the Rev. Ibrahim Shomali, the Palestinian priest who has been leading the protests.

Israel has been building the barrier since 2002 in response to a wave of suicide bombings early last decade that killed hundreds of people. Israel says the barrier is needed to keep out Palestinian attackers.

Palestinians say the barrier is a land grab because it zigzags through the West Bank. When complete, nearly 10 percent of the West Bank, including many Israeli settlements, would lie on Israel’s side, according to the United Nations. Roughly two-thirds of the 700 kilometer (450-mile) structure has been built.

Beit Jala is a postcard-pretty Christian town of 16,000 in the overwhelmingly Muslim West Bank. The likeness of the Palestinian patron, Saint George, is carved into building facades. Groceries sell beer and butchers sell pork, items banned under Islamic law. A bowling alley faces an Israeli military base.

Yet the village feels hemmed in. It abuts the biblical town of Bethlehem on one side. On another, barbed wire separates Beit Jala from the Jewish settlement of Har Gilo. Part of the separation barrier seals in another side, protecting a nearby road used by Jewish settlers. Residents say the planned stretch of construction will close off one of the village’s last remaining open spaces.

“They are crowding us inside a ghetto,” sighed Issa Khalilieh, whose family lost 12 acres (five hectares) in years of Israeli confiscations, and is poised to lose another three acres (one hectare) to the barrier.

In the Beit Jala area, Israel’s Defense Ministry plans to seize some 790 acres (320 hectares) of the Cremisan Valley, said lawyer Ghaith Nasser. Some one-third of the land is Vatican-owned, with a monastery surrounded by pines, playground and vineyard that monks have used to make wine since 1882. Nearby is a convent where nuns run a school for 600 Palestinian students. Some 60 families own the rest, a series of terraced olive and apricot orchards plunging into the valley. Residents go there to relax, barbecue and pray.

If the route goes as planned, the monastery and orchards will be on Israel’s side of the barrier. The convent and school will be on the Palestinian side, surrounded by high concrete walls, lawyers said.

Yigal Palmor, spokesman for Israel’s Foreign Ministry, said the government is in “direct dialogue” with the Vatican and affected monks and nuns in the area to try come to an amicable decision.

An Israeli-Palestinian documentary on the fight of residents in the village of Bilin to reroute the barrier was nominated for an Oscar this year.

The route of the barrier has drawn accusations that Israel is using the structure to incorporate some Jewish settlements, how home to more than 500,000 Israelis, into its future borders.

“The barrier has a route that … is clearly not defined by what Israel calls security reasons,” said Aviv Tatarsky of Ir Amim, an advocacy group that monitors the route of the barrier around Jerusalem. “The planned route goes way into the West Bank to put the settlement blocs within its area.”

Friday, April 26, 2013

Whatever Happened to France's Voice in Europe?


Reuters, April 24, 2013
BRUSSELS/PARIS (Reuters)—A few hours after midnight one Sunday last month, as negotiations over a rescue for Cyprus dragged into a second day, French Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici fell asleep.

Most euro zone ministers in Brussels that night failed to notice, continuing to pore over the details of the multi-billion-euro deal. It fell to Christine Lagarde, French director of the International Monetary Fund, to approach Moscovici and nudge him awake, according to witnesses at the March 24 talks.

The sight of the IMF head waking up France’s top finance official in a crisis meeting neatly illustrates a question that is troubling European diplomats: what has happened to France’s voice in Europe?

For decades France has been central to the European project that was born out of World War Two and now reaches from Europe’s Atlantic coast to beyond the former Iron Curtain.

Straddling north and south, France has a unique perspective on Europe. It is the European Union’s largest economy after Germany. One of six founders of the original European coal and steel community in 1951, it has shaped and often led, the institutions that make the EU tick.

The readiness of successive French and German leaders to work together has for decades created a consensus among two former enemies that has steered Europe through crisis and change—from the end of the Cold War and Germany’s reunification, to the expansion of the EU to the east and the introduction of the single European currency in 1999.

For much of the past four years, during which the euro zone was nearly torn apart by a debt crisis, the Franco-German axis has held true. But in the past six months, questions have arisen about what France is offering in terms of fresh ideas, and how it is dealing with the rest of Europe.

“You can see a shrinking presence, a progressive disappearance of France on most issues that concern the economic agenda,” said Fredrik Erixon, director of the European Centre for International Political Economy, a Brussels think tank.

European diplomats from a range of member states, speaking on condition of anonymity, are more blunt.

“You don’t hear France’s voice at all. They are nowhere, just nowhere,” said a senior European diplomat who is in frequent contact with other member states.

“This is a critical country and yet it seems absent,” he said, mentioning as an example a lack of sustained French input to the debate on how to strengthen economic and monetary union.

“It’s not just strange, it’s worrying,” he said. “Everyone is aware of the problem. There’s concern at multiple levels.”

Even France accepts something is wrong. Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault told parliament this month it was time the country reasserted itself so that “what it says counts in Europe, and that it can rediscover the leadership role it has lost”.

Diplomats, officials and analysts interviewed by Reuters offered a range of theories for the ebbing French influence—from the style-change since the consensual Francois Hollande took over from the more combative Nicolas Sarkozy, to the fact that English is displacing French as Brussels’ lingua franca.

There is broad agreement that one root of the problem lies in France’s inability so far to follow Germany’s lead in reforming its economy. A lack of economic competitiveness has undermined France’s ability to project influence in Brussels.

Hollande insists early reforms such as a deal with trade unions to loosen labour law should be given time to work, and points to the fact that he has already managed to reduce France’s public deficit from its Sarkozy-era levels.

Yet critics say the pace of reform is not fast enough, especially when it comes to pensions reform and overhauling a centralised economy.

Away from the economy, France remains vocal. On foreign and defence policy, its intervention to help combat Islamist rebels in Mali and its diplomatic efforts to end the Syrian conflict show the veto-holding U.N. Security Council member remains a powerful voice, and one able to make an impact. In such matters, France is as confident as it was a decade ago when it galvanised European resistance to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

But on Europe’s most pressing economic issue—how it sees off the debt crisis and puts itself on a footing to compete with the United States and Asia—the weakness of France’s economy and public finances means its voice is muffled.

“If you don’t have your house in order, it’s very difficult to influence others,” said Erixon of the ECIPE think tank. “This is not the sort of France we’ve grown used to having in the European Union.”

Just how the European Union will evolve if French influence is durably muted and Germany is pushed against its will into a lone leadership role is hard to predict.

But it did not go unnoticed in Paris that it was the prime minister of Britain and his family who were recently invited to spend the weekend with Merkel at a country estate.

“These days it is with David Cameron that Angela Merkel tries to build a common position,” wrote Le Point weekly with a hint of pique. “And not with Francois Hollande.”

Photographer's loss offers hope for Boston wounded


By Emilio Morenatti, AP, Apr 23, 2013
BARCELONA, Spain (AP)—In the first horrific moments after the Boston bombing, with smoke still billowing around the wounded, I know what is going through the minds of the maimed victims.

They are at once conscious and unconscious. They want to scream, but they cannot scream. They want to wake up from a nightmare, but they are awake.

I lost my leg in a bomb blast. I know the violent shock of a day that begins well and ends with an amputation, the fog of drugs and surgery, the months of painful rehabilitation.

I know the suffering that lies ahead for these people in Boston. And I know the possibilities, too.

For those who lost a limb or more in the Boston Marathon, Monday, April 15, 2013, was the day their world changed forever.

Mine changed on Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2009. I had been embedded with the U.S. military for two weeks in southern Afghanistan as a photographer for The Associated Press, and this was to have been my last patrol before going home. It had been a long day in the open desert of Kandahar province and I was whipped, barely awake, in fact, when our eight-wheel armored Stryker vehicle hit a roadside bomb and flipped over, knocking me unconscious.

When I came to, I tried to get up but couldn’t; my left foot was hanging by a few tendons. I felt brutal pain, like an electric shock, that began in my leg and swept through the rest of my body. Lying inside the vehicle, I thought of my wife, and willed myself to stay alive.

Eventually, a soldier found me and tied on a tourniquet.

In my years as a photojournalist, I’d taken many pictures of wounded soldiers and victims of suicide bombers. I had covered medical evacuations from Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Palestinian territories, and found it odd to suddenly be among those pulled from an inferno and carried on a stretcher—along with two other soldiers and AP Television News videographer Andi Jatmiko.

They loaded me onto a helicopter next to a soldier who had lost both of his legs and we locked hands as the chopper took off for the provincial capital of Kandahar. The solidarity in that moment is the last thing I remember before waking up in a hospital tent to find my left leg had been amputated below the knee. There was no option to save it, doctors told me. Bone and tissue were destroyed by shrapnel. But fortunately my knee was intact, and that would make a substantial difference in my future mobility, they explained.

That offered little comfort as I lay alone and exhausted in a hospital bed in Afghanistan. I had so many questions about life with just one leg but I preferred sleep to thinking about my uncertain future.

The difference between those who lost limbs in Boston and me is that I knew I was taking a risk in a war zone and assumed it willingly, while they had merely gone out to cheer friends and relatives at a family sporting event.

I was a photographer documenting soldiers at war and everyday life for civilians under fire. But before violence grabs you, does anyone really believe he will become one of the dead or wounded? No. Nothing had happened to me on dozens of previous patrols with the military through hostile lands. And while I suspected I was playing a kind of Russian roulette, I also told myself that car accidents happen every day and most people don’t stop driving because of that.

For months after the explosion I was tortured by so many “what ifs.” What if I had stayed back to pack rather than going on patrol that day? What if I had sat a little bit to the right, would the shrapnel have missed my leg? Or if I had sat to the left, would I have lost both legs like the soldier next to me?

I imagine those in Boston whose bodies were torn up by nails or the blasts have similar thoughts: Why didn’t I stand at mile 25, go for water, leave earlier, stay home? I would like to tell them that these questions fade as one begins to accept the reality of losing a limb.

The morphine they gave me to dim the pain of my amputation sapped my energy. I wanted off it so I could start my recuperation with all my strength and walk as soon as possible. I am a Spanish citizen, not American, and was lucky that the AP was able to work bureaucratic miracles to get me admitted to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, one of the world’s best rehab hospitals.

I was 40 years old, agile and in good shape from exercise and work as a photographer in rough terrain. I even used to jog in the Afghan capital of Kabul when I lived there. So just a month after the explosion, I threw myself into rehab. Although my wounds were still fresh, I put on my first prosthesis and took my first steps. I was determined.

And I was completely unprepared for the difficulty.

It took tremendous strength to learn to walk again. I needed practice, but practice rubbed my wounds raw. Exercise was essential and exercise produced blisters where the prosthesis was joined to my leg—more hot pain.

I was frustrated and felt useless on the days I couldn’t exercise, waiting for the blisters to drain and heal. Then I would put the prosthesis back on and push myself to my limit until the skin broke again.

In those first days, I could only take a few steps. In the first weeks, it took me an hour to walk a mile. I worked out on a bicycle, on a treadmill and with weights. And month by month, I increased my speed so that finally I could walk the 2 1/2 miles from my rented home to the hospital in 25 minutes.

If those maimed in Boston were to ask me what was harder, the physical or psychological recovery, I would say the two go hand-in-hand.

At first I thought it was enough to recover physically, and that learning to walk and work again would naturally produce a psychological recovery.

I was wrong.

The strength of the wounded soldiers at Walter Reed helped me a great deal. Even though many of their injuries were so much worse than mine, I never heard them complain about pain or withdraw in self-pity.

I lost only the lower half of my left leg and came to understand that important distinction alongside soldiers who had lost a leg up to the hip, both legs, or legs and arms. We shared our daily experiences and hardships, often with humor. When a soldier who had lost both arms and legs teasingly called me “Paper Cut” for my lesser wounds, I called him “Trunk” and we laughed.

The soldiers, and some of my Spanish friends with amputations, also taught me the difference between losing a leg and missing a leg. The missing leg can be replaced with a prosthetic, but a loss is permanent. If you don’t confront the feelings of loss—the fact that your world has changed—you never fully recover from the amputation.

The support of my family and friends was crucial. My relationship with my wife after the accident changed to a deeper love. I could see that the patients who didn’t have as many visitors, as much love and reassurance around them, did not respond to physical therapy as quickly.

And then there was my camera. The very instrument that had gotten me into this mess, if you will, became my inspiration and part of my salvation. I carried it with me all the time to photograph the recovery of my hospital mates and to test my own. It took a lot of practice to be able to look through the lens and maintain my balance while walking, as I had done before the amputation.

With a prosthetic, you have to watch for bumps and dips in your path because you have no feeling in your false foot. If you take a wrong step, it is easy to fall, and I fell many times before learning to compensate. Running is much harder, as the body struggles to adjust to a prosthetic leg. When I was 15, I ran a marathon. Now, I am running three miles once a week and I am exhausted. My goal is to run again and recapture the runner’s high, the feeling of strength that I used to experience.

The new amputees in Boston will discover, as I did, that there is a whole world of prosthetics to choose from. Who would know if you didn’t need one? There are feet made for running, walking, climbing, cycling, even for swimming and golfing. But it turns out there’s no such thing as an all-terrain prosthesis, so in the end, I accumulated several.

I normally wear a versatile, durable foot, but I also carry a couple of extras in a backpack, one spare foot and a special one for running. I even have one for roller skating, which, after multiple clashes with trees, parked cars and the pavement, is now one of my favorite sports.

In the same way I have always tended to my cameras, I now must care for my prosthetics, making sure they are always in perfect working condition.

Like the amputees in Boston today, 3 1/2 years ago I joined a community to which no one wishes to belong. I have changed over the years, as they will.

For better or worse, I am more vulnerable now. If I were to offer advice, it would be that it’s possible to accept help without feeling dependent. I would tell them what I tell myself, “Emilio, you’re missing a foot so don’t be too hard on yourself, and when someone offers you a seat on the bus, take it.”

I would tell them the greatest truth I have learned is that I am a man who had a leg amputated, not an amputee. I am still a whole person.

I have returned to work as a photojournalist with the AP. I have tried to become a better person, sharing my small successes with all the people who have helped me in critical times. I appreciate that I live in a nice house in Barcelona with my wife, who is pregnant. I am looking forward to becoming a father for the first time.

I know they cannot imagine this in Boston now, but I want them to know that while certainly I miss my leg, I feel very fortunate.

Pope Francis' preaching style is low-key and mostly private

Alessandro Speciale, Religion News Service, Apr 22, 2013
VATICAN CITY (RNS) When you’re the pope, few things matter as much as what you say and, especially, where you say it.

From the pulpit of St. Peter’s Basilica or an outdoor altar erected in St. Peter’s Square, popes can command global media attention. Pope Francis, however, has settled in with a smaller congregation for his homilies that’s more in keeping with his low-key style.

Every day at 7 a.m., Francis celebrates Mass in the chapel of the Casa Santa Marta, the Vatican’s hotel-style guesthouse he has chosen to call home instead of the luxurious papal apartments. His brief, colorful homilies are delivered to small groups of Vatican workers, from policemen to doctors and bank employees.

Often quoting anecdotes from his time as a pastor and archbishop in Buenos Aires, Francis has used his morning homilies to offer spiritual reflections in an accessible, down-to-earth style—a far cry from the lengthy and highly intellectual public homilies of his predecessors.

According to the Vatican’s chief spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, Francis regularly speaks off the cuff at Santa Marta, without any prepared text.

It is unclear whether these homilies are official papal texts; in fact, they are not published on the Vatican website.

But Vatican Radio and L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican’s semiofficial newspaper, have been reporting on them regularly, publishing extracts of Francis’ texts.

Their recurrent themes—the risks of gossip and slander among Christians, the virtue of meekness, the threats of the devil—offer an insight into the pope’s main concerns, framed in simple imagery that a parish priest might use. The impression is reinforced by frequent photos of Francis sitting in prayer in the back seats at the end of the Mass.

The pope’s morning homilies are “fascinating, a kind of mini Magisterium,” according to John Thavis, a former Rome bureau chief for Catholic News Service and a frequent Vatican commentator. “They seem designed to provide food for thought at a very accessible level.”

In some cases, though, it is possible to find hints on how Francis might handle the bigger challenges he faces as pope.

On April 9, talking about gossiping and criticizing others as “temptations of the evil one who does not want the Spirit to come to us and bring about peace and meekness,” he advised a course of action to deal with a community’s internal problems: “Keep quiet, and if you have something to say, say it to the interested parties, to those who can remedy the situation … not to the entire neighborhood.”

On April 16, Pope Benedict XVI’s 86th birthday, Francis discussed the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), whose modernizing reforms became a point of contention after his predecessor tried to reconcile with ultra-conservative traditionalists who reject the council’s reforms. Francis criticized “those who wish to turn the clock back” within the church.

The morning homilies at Santa Marta started on March 21, just a week after Francis’ election. The first “guests” were the staff of the guesthouse itself, followed by Vatican garbage collectors and gardeners.

Here are some choice nuggets from Pope Francis’ morning homilies:

March 22: “If our heart is closed, if our heart is made of stone, then the stones will end up in our hands, and we will be ready to throw them at someone.”

April 2: “Sometimes in our life tears are the glasses to see Jesus.”

April 5: “In order to solve their problems, many people resort to fortune tellers and tarot cards. But only Jesus saves and we must bear witness to this! He is the only one.”

April 15: “The age of martyrs is not yet over, even today we can say, in truth, that the Church has more martyrs now than during the first centuries.”

April 17: When the church doesn’t empower the laity it is “not the mother, but the babysitter, that takes care of the baby—to put the baby to sleep. It is a church dormant.”

April 18: Christians don’t believe in “an ‘all over the place’—god, a ‘god-spray’ so to speak, who is a little bit everywhere but who no-one really knows anything about … We believe in persons, and when we talk to God we talk to Persons.

My Best Mistake: Not Telling My Boss He Stank

By Charlene Li, April 23, 2013

My boss stank. And I mean, he literally smelled bad. At the start of the day, he’d be freshly showered, but by the end of the work day, a horrible body odor hung around him. I knew I wasn’t the only person noticing this as other people in the office began mentioning it to me. The worst part: he was a really awesome boss and no one could bring it upon themselves to tell him.


I stressed about this for days—and then weeks had gone by. All the time, the gossip kept building. I finally got up the courage to tell him during an upcoming check-in meeting. We spent most of the meeting going over things we each needed to do, and he then asked, “So, is there anything else that we should discuss?”


The moment had finally come. I cleared my throat and said. “Yes, there is one more thing. At the end of the day, you have really bad body odor. I realized you didn’t know this, or you would have done something about it.” Then I sat there, absolutely mortified.


Without missing a beat, my boss said, “Well, that’s good to know. I’ll put on my list to pick up a really strong deodorant.”


And that was it. The next day, no more body odor.


On the surface, this doesn’t seem like a big mistake, only a highly embarrassing professional moment both for me and my boss. My colleagues and I stressed about it for weeks, leading to who knows how many hours of lost productivity. My big mistake wasn’t telling my boss that he stank, but waiting so long to finally getting around to it.


This is a mistake that I’ve continued to make throughout my career—waiting far too long to deliver bad news to people. This odiferous affair taught me that people are far more resilient than we give them credit for, and that we are all so much better to be forthright with each other than to avoid hard truths.


I hope you learn from my big career mistake and take it upon yourself to tell share quickly something that you’ve been meaning to say. You’ll be a far better friend and colleague for doing this, and I’ll bet you’ll kick yourself for not having brought it up sooner.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith