Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

The Boy who was Turned into a Girl

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/boyturnedgirl.shtml
First shown: BBC2 9.00pm Thursday 7th December 2000

In 1965 in the Canadian town of Winnipeg, Janet Reimer gave birth to twin boys - Bruce and Brian. Six months later a bungled circumcision left Bruce without a penis. Based on a radical new theory of gender development the decision was taken to raise Bruce as a girl. In 1967 Bruce became Brenda and for the next three decades this case would be at the heart of one of the most controversial theories in the history of science.

The man behind this work was world-renowned psychologist Dr John Money. In the 1950s Dr Money developed a theory that revolutionised our understanding of gender. Money believed that what he called our 'gender identity' - what makes us think, feel and behave as boys or girls - is not fully formed by the time of birth. While we may have some innate sense of being a boy or a girl, for up to two years after birth, our brains are, in effect, malleable and we can be taught to grow up as either a boy or girl by how we are raised - by the toys we are given, the guidance we receive from adults and the clothes we are given to wear. This became known as the 'theory of gender neutrality'.

Dr Money had reached this conclusion by working with a rare group of individuals born with ambiguous genitals - people known as intersexuals or hermaphrodites. Dr Money studied groups of intersex children, and concluded that these children could be brought up as either boys or girls regardless of their genetic or physical sex. The legacy of Dr Money's work was a revolution in the treatment of 'intersex'. From the 1950s to the present day many intersex children born with a tiny penis are reassigned as female even if they are actually genetically male.

But not everyone agreed with Dr Money's theories. Since the 1950s a small group of scientists including Dr Milton Diamond have questioned John Money's work. Diamond believed that our sex is already defined in our brains before we are born. He was convinced that the power of our genes and hormones was so strong that no amount of nurturing could override them.

But John Money's theory had already become firmly accepted around the world and the most dramatic confirmation of the theory came from one particular case - the case of Bruce Reimer.

Bruce was a normal boy, not an intersex child, and yet the decision was made to turn this boy who had lost his penis, into a girl. Under the guidance of Dr Money and his team at Johns Hopkins University this baby boy was surgically changed into a girl. After surgeons at Hopkins had castrated baby Bruce, he became baby Brenda. The family were instructed how to bring up Brenda as a normal little girl. According to Dr Money's theory she would grow up believing herself to be female and would go on to live a normal happy life as a woman. It seemed the ultimate test that nurture could override nature.

Thirty years after Bruce became Brenda, the impact of this extraordinary story continues. After almost 14 years living as a female, Brenda Reimer reverted to her true biological sex - the case of the boy who was turned into a girl had failed. Brenda took the name David and for the last twenty years he has lived anonymously in his hometown of Winnipeg. For almost all this time no one knew the outcome of John Money's celebrated case. But now that David has gone public, the case is being widely discussed once again and its impact on John Money's theory of gender development and the treatment of intersex children is being hotly debated.

Vanished: The Plane That Disappeared

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/vanished.shtml
BBC2 9:00pm Thursday 2nd November 2000


On August 2nd 1947, a British civilian version of the wartime Lancaster bomber took off from Buenos Aires airport on a scheduled flight to Santiago. There were 5 crew and 6 passengers on board the plane - named "Stardust". But Stardust never made it to Santiago. Instead it vanished when it was apparently just a few minutes from touchdown. One final strange morse code radio message - "STENDEC" - was sent, but after that nothing more was heard from the plane.

Despite a massive search of the Andes mountains no trace of the plane was ever found. For 53 years the families of those who disappeared have not known what happened to their loved ones.

But earlier this year the plane suddenly reappeared on a glacier high up in the Andes, more than 50 km’s from the area where the plane was last reported. In February this year the Argentine army arranged a major expedition to visit the crash site beneath the massive Tupangato peak (6800m). Their aim was to bring back the human remains which had been found at the site, so that an attempt could be made at identifying them. The expedition also offered a unique opportunity for crash investigators to see if they could finally explain what happened to the ill-fated plane.

'Horizon' gained exclusive access to this expedition, and now for the first time the full story of what happened to "Stardust" can be told. Why did the plane crash without warning? Why was it so far from its planned route across the mountains? What was the meaning of the last mysterious message - "STENDEC" - sent by the plane’s radio operator? Would it be possible more than 50 years after the crash to identify the remaining fragments of human remains that so graphically testified to the horrific destructive forces involved in the crash? And perhaps most mysteriously, why did the wreckage elude discovery for so long, despite regular mountaineering trips to Tupangato over the years?

The expedition was joined at an army base in the Andes foothills. The threat of altitude sickness and the approach of winter meant that the trip required meticulous planning. More than 100 mules were used on the four day journey to the crash site, ferrying people and supplies to base camp, and then on up to an advance camp on the glacier. Several mules fell on the perilous journey over a 4500m pass; others bolted.

After four gruelling days the expedition finally reached the Tupangato glacier. They had enough supplies for 36 hours to investigate the crash site and finally explain what had happened to Stardust, and why it had disappeared for so long. At the crash site 'Horizon' followed the crash investigator as his ideas on the crash changed with each new discovery. The plane’s main wheels were discovered, one still fully blown up. One of Stardust’s Rolls Royce engines was lying on the ice, and nearby it’s propeller. Damage to the propeller indicated that the engine was working normally at the time of the crash. The wreckage offered no smoking gun to explain why the crash happened.

Human remains were discovered - a hand, parts of a torso half buried in ice, fragments of hair - poignant reminders that this was above all a human tragedy. At a lab in Buenos Aires scientists are still trying to extract sufficient DNA from the remains to allow the remains to be identified. Few of those who went down with the aircraft were old enough to have children, so DNA matches are being made with more distant relatives, further complicating the work. The difficult task of identifying the remains brought down from Tupangato is still underway.

Meanwhile the air crash investigators focused on the mystery of why the plane had not been found for so many years. Their analysis led them to suspect that the reason the plane had remained hidden for so long could lie with the glacier the wreckage was lying on. As soon as they returned from the mountains the investigators visited a glacial specialist in Mendoza. He told them that if the plane had crashed on the upper part of the glacier it would have been gradually buried by year on year snowfall, until it became a part of the glacier itself. It would then have travelled downhill with the glacier under the influence of gravity. Eventually it reached a warmer zone, and here the ice started to melt. Gradually, out of the melting ice, came the remains of Stardust. The wreckage hadn’t been found because for more than 50 years it had been buried inside the glacier.

Stardust isn’t the only plane to be buried inside a glacier. In Greenland an entire squadron of second world war aircraft which crash landed on top of the Greenland ice cap in 1942 were recently discovered a hundred metres under the ice. They too had been buried by years of snowfall which gradually hardened into ice, until planes and glacier became one.

But having solved the mystery of why Stardust had disappeared for so long, much hard work remained - particularly trying to explain why the plane was more than 50 miles off course when it crashed. The Argentine investigation needed to explain why a highly experienced crew could make such a massive error. They focused on a meteorological phenomenon that was virtually unknown in 1947 - the 'jetstream'. This high altitude wind can blow at more than one hundred miles an hour. But in 1947 very few planes flew high enough to encounter the jetstream. Stardust was one of the exceptions.

On the day of the flight bad weather over the Andes persuaded the crew to fly close to the plane’s maximum altitude, so they could fly over the top of the weather… and the mountains. Stardust’s superior performance should have guaranteed it’s safety. But in fact it was the decision to fly high that was at the root of the disaster. Unknown to the crew, they were flying straight into the jetstream. And because of the bad weather, they couldn’t see the ground, so they had no way of knowing that the jetstream was dramatically slowing them down. It meant that although the crew’s calculations showed they had crossed the Andes, in fact the jetstream’s powerful wind meant they were still on the wrong side of the mountains. So when Stardust began it’s descent, rather than being above Santiago airport, it was on a collision course with Mount Tupangato.

The jetstream finally explained the reason for the massive navigation error, and therefore the crash. But the investigators were unable to explain one final mystery, the last radio message - Stendec - sent by Stardust just before the crash. Many explanations have been advanced, but to this day none has convincingly explained what the message meant.

Nosso Campo de Missão: O Mundo

Peter Amsterdam

Nos últimos meses, tenho pensado nos primeiros discípulos e algumas das mudanças que vivenciaram no início de sua caminhada de fé. Passaram uns três anos e meio com Jesus, compartilhando das coisas grandiosas que Ele fez, ouvindo-O pregar, ensinar e contar parábolas, e vendo-O fazer milagres.

Viviam uma vida incrivelmente emocionante, muito diferente das pessoas comuns. Tinham um relacionamento especial com Jesus. Ele os ensinava pessoalmente. Participavam de Seu ministério. Conviviam com Ele. Sabiam que havia apenas cinco pães e dois pequenos peixes, mas distribuíram o suficiente para alimentar 5 mil pessoas; e em outra ocasião sete pães e uns poucos pequenos peixe alimentaram 4 mil pessoas. Dá para imaginar como isso deve ter sido incrível?

Viajar com Ele, aprender com Ele, ouvir revelações diretamente de Sua boca, vê-lO curar os enfermos, sendo desafiado e desafiando os escribas e fariseus, expulsar os cambistas e ressuscitar os mortos deve ter sido eletrizante. Isso sim é um estilo de vida impressionante!

A expectativa era que a vida continuasse assim até que Jesus se tornasse rei, quando então estariam ao Seu lado revestidos de poder e honra. É por isso que discutiam, provavelmente até brigavam, sobre quem dentre eles seria o maior no reino e quem sentaria à Sua direita. Afinal, como Ele Se tornaria rei, eles teriam prestígio e influência. As pessoas buscariam sua proteção e favores. Seriam ricos, famosos e importantes. Eles seriam poderosos.

Quando finalmente chegaram a Jerusalém, as multidões espalharam seus mantos e ramos no chão e Jesus, montado em um jumento, entrou na cidade. O povo gritava: “Hosana! Bendito é o que vem em nome do Senhor!"[1] Que emocionante! Imaginem a expectativa dos discípulos. Parecia que o futuro estava garantido, que tudo ia bem e que ficaria cada vez melhor.

Então... Surpresa! Jesus foi preso!

Menos de 24 horas mais tarde Ele estava morto! Que choque! Tudo muda de um dia para o outro. Todas as esperanças dos discípulos ficam destroçadas, o estilo de vida com o qual se acostumaram e suas expectativas para futuro foram destruídos. Acabou! Tudo mudou. Todo o ambiente, toda a cultura, tudo que tinham foi embora! Deve ter sido terrivelmente difícil. Não dá nem para imaginar o que eles passaram. Eles não entendiam o que estava acontecendo, ficaram com medo e se esconderam.

Claro que, três dias mais tarde, Ele estava com eles novamente. Imaginem a alegria! Jesus passou então quarenta dias explicando as Escrituras aos discípulos, e eles começam a entender os desafios que estavam enfrentando, bem como a tarefa que tinham pela frente.

Então, Jesus ascende ao céu e, dias mais tarde, o Espírito Santo desce sobre eles, e dá início a uma explosão de testificação. Passaram a pregar com grande poder. Cinco mil convertidos em um dia e três mil no próximo. Estão em Jerusalém, com muitos novos discípulos os quais ensinam e treinam. Recebem as pessoas novas, estão juntos, compartilham todas as coisas, vivem Atos 2:44–45: “E todos os que criam estavam juntos.” Com o tempo alguns problemas começam a surgir. As pessoas começam a resmungar e reclamar. É preciso algum tipo de estrutura: elegem diáconos para ajudar a cuidar dos problemas pessoais, estabelecem regras, etc.

Jesus os havia incumbido de ir por todo mundo, fazer discípulos de todas as nações. Disse que depois que o Espírito Santo viesse, seriam testemunhas em Jerusalém, Judeia, Samaria e até os confins da terra.

Começaram em Jerusalém, e pelo que parece estavam bastante ocupados com tantos novos convertidos. Demorou para começarem a ir por todo o mundo. Ao ler o livro de Atos é fácil ficar com a impressão de que essas coisas aconteceram rapidamente. Que eles estavam em Jerusalém se enchendo do Espírito Santo e algumas semanas mais tarde na Antioquia, e pouco tempo depois o Apóstolo Paulo já estava levando o Evangelho para a Turquia e Grécia. Mas, na verdade, demoraram anos. É muito provável que havia coisas que eles tiveram de aprender enquanto trabalhavam juntos para ensinar, treinar e cuidar de todos aqueles convertidos, as quais os ajudariam a realizar o trabalho que teriam quando não estivessem todos juntos.

Chegou o momento em que eles tiveram de se dispersar, quando os discípulos tiveram de ir a outras terras e povos. Viveram e trabalharam juntos por anos, tinham uma história em comum, eram amigos, camaradas de lutas, e agora havia chegado a hora de se separarem, de se mudarem e levar o Evangelho a novos horizontes.

As coisas mudaram. Chegara a hora de partir, de ir embora, alguns sozinhos; outros, em pequenos grupos, para lugares onde o cristianismo não existia, onde as pessoas não haviam ouvido falar de Jesus. De certa forma, precisavam começar tudo de novo. Mudar para longe de seus amigos e sem o apoio de uma grande comunidade. Tiveram de começar do nada, conhecer pessoas, testificar para elas, edificar um trabalho do zero. Deve ter sido terrivelmente solitário. Deve ter sido um grande desafio. Deve ter sido muito diferente do que eles estavam acostumados. Mas foram esses homens e mulheres que levaram o Evangelho aos lugares que Deus lhes mostrou, e que fizeram que os ensinamentos e a mensagem de Jesus se espalhassem por todo o mundo.

Eles testificaram, pregaram, ensinaram, venceram, construíram comunidades, e a fé continuou em frente. Tinham de fazer o que podiam todos os dias para levarem a fé para outras pessoas. E foi o que fizeram. Era diferente de antes. Provavelmente mais difícil e, sem dúvida, levou algum tempo para começarem de novo, para se ajustarem às mudanças; mas estavam determinados a fazer sua parte, a realizar a missão onde Deus os guiasse.

Ele ainda chama Seus seguidores a pregarem o Evangelho e fazer discípulos. Ele quer usá-lo para ganhar o seu mundo. Onde quer que você esteja, em seja o que for que Ele tenha lhe chamado para fazer, você pode alcançar o seu mundo, as pessoas ao seu redor e aquelas que encontrar no seu caminho.

O Senhor quer que você use seus dons de forma que você possa brilhar para valer. Você possui dons, talentos e habilidades que lhe são únicos, que formam quem você é. Deus quer que você os use para a Sua glória, para o bem dos outros, para mudar o mundo deles e o seu.

Algumas pessoas têm dons musicais, outras têm jeito para negócios, ou sabem cuidar fisicamente dos demais; algumas são boas em ouvir, outras desfrutam de hobbys que proporcionam oportunidades para conhecer pessoas. Seja qual for o seu dom, talento ou desejo, o Senhor pode usar isso como um meio para ajudá-lo a alcançar os outros com o Seu amor e Sua mensagem. A liberdade de permitir que Ele o guie para onde e para o que Ele quer, deixa você em uma posição muito melhor para Ele usar os talentos que Ele lhe deu. Para muitos, as mudanças na Família geraram oportunidades melhores e mais personalizadas de evangelizar.

Além de tornar seus talentos bênçãos para os outros, Ele quer que sejam bênçãos para você também. Dizem que o trabalho ideal é aquele no qual você pode usar os seus dons, fazer aquilo que faz bem e que desfruta fazer. Existe melhor forma de realizar a missão do que combinando seus talentos para levar as pessoas para o Reino dos Céus?

Ele lhe deu os talentos e o chamou para, enquanto discípulo e cristão, alcançar outras pessoas. Fomos chamados para compartilhar as boas novas com outros. Sua missão pode ser em sua cidade natal. Pode ser em um campo de missão distante. Você foi chamado ao “mundo” para o qual Ele o guiou, para as pessoas com as quais você interage, seja no trabalho, no parque com seus filhos, ou até mesmo os seus filhos, ou em ministério em tempo integral. Seu chamado é para alcançar as pessoas no seu mundo, aquelas com as quais entra em contato, que talvez tenham os mesmo interesses ou pertençam ao mesmo “clube” que você.

Não importa o lugar para o qual Deus o guiou em sua vida, o mundo a sua volta é seu campo de missão. Isso não quer dizer que você vá se envolver em um ministério em tempo integral, mas, conforme interage com elas, surgirão oportunidades para conhecer pessoas para as quais ministrar, pelas quais orar, influenciar para o bem, levar a salvação, ensinar e treinar.

Imagino que quando os discípulos saíram, mais sozinhos do que antes, se sentiam solitários e se perguntavam como conseguiriam fazer uma diferença. Foi difícil, provavelmente desanimador, mas eles testificaram, pregaram, ensinaram e ganharam outras pessoas para o Senhor, e com o tempo, construíram comunidades de crentes. Formaram novas redes de relacionamento, novas amizades, influenciaram as pessoas ao seu redor e, por terem feito o que podiam dia após dia, ano após anos, o cristianismo cresceu e passou de geração em geração.

Talvez se sentiram sozinhos, mas não estavam. Talvez você se sinta sozinho, mas não está. O Senhor está com você, e se você O estiver seguindo, indo aonde Ele quer que você vá, fazendo o que Ele lhe diz, então pode estar confiante de que Ele estará com você em qualquer situação. Ele quer e vai usá-lo para fazer uma diferença em seu mundo.

Deus quer que você faça uma diferença em seu mundo. Você tem essa oportunidade ao fazer o que Ele lhe chamou para fazer, vivendo como Ele lhe chamou para viver, deixando sua luz brilhar, influenciado as pessoas ao seu redor, plantando sementes de fé nas vidas das pessoas, e fazendo discípulos daqueles que se sentem chamados. Talvez demore um pouco, mas fazer sua parte todo o dia é o que vai ajudá-lo a mudar o mundo à sua volta, a mudar os corações das pessoas que o Senhor trouxe para sua vida. Esse é o nosso chamado. Essa é a missão.

Publicado originalmente em outubro de 2011. Adaptado e republicado em janeiro de 2014. Tradução Denise Oliveira. Revisão Hebe Rondon Flandoli.


[1] Marcos 11:9–10.

Our Mission Field: The World

By Peter Amsterdam

Audio length: 12:04
Download Audio (11MB)

Over the last months, I have been thinking about the first disciples and some of the changes they went through early on in their walk of faith. They were with Jesus for about three and a half years, witnessing the great things He did, listening to Him preach, teach, tell parables, and seeing Him perform miracles.

They lived an incredibly exciting life, a very different life from that of the average person. They had a special relationship with Jesus. They were personally taught by Him. They took part in His ministry. They saw Him up close and personal. They knew there were only five loaves and two fishes, but they passed out enough to feed 5,000; and another time seven loaves and a few small fish fed 4,000. Can you imagine how incredible that must have been?

Traveling with Him, being taught by Him, hearing revelations direct from His mouth to their ears, seeing Him heal the sick, being challenged by, and challenging the scribes and Pharisees, overturning the moneychangers’ tables, raising the dead, all must have been electrifying. Talk about an amazing lifestyle!

They were expecting it to continue on until Jesus became king, and when He did, they were going to be right there with Him, with power and glory. That’s why they would have discussions, probably arguments, as to which of them would be the greatest in the kingdom, who would sit at His right hand. Because if He was going to be king, then they were going to be prestigious and influential. People would come to them for patronage, for favors. They would be rich and famous and important. They would be powerful.

They finally come to Jerusalem, and the crowds spread their cloaks and branches on the ground as Jesus, riding on a colt, comes into town. The people are shouting: Hosanna! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord! Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David! Hosanna in the highest!1 What excitement! What expectations the disciples must have had. Their future was set, everything was going great, and it was only going to get better and better.

And then … wham! Jesus is arrested!

Less than 24 hours later, He’s dead. What a shock. From one day to the next, everything changes. All of their hopes are dashed, the lifestyle they were used to and their expectations for the future are destroyed. It’s over, it’s all changed. The whole atmosphere, the whole culture, everything that they had, is now gone! It must have been incredibly difficult. I can’t even imagine what they were going through. They didn’t understand, they were fearful, they hid.

Of course, three days later He was with them again. What a joy that must have been! For the next forty days He explains more from Scripture, and they begin to understand the changes they are facing, as well as the task before them.

Then He ascends into heaven and days later the Holy Spirit descends upon them, and the witnessing explosion begins. They powerfully preach. Five thousand converts one day. Three thousand another. They’re bunched up there in Jerusalem, with lots of new disciples whom they are teaching and training. They’re gathering people in, they’re staying together, they’re sharing all things, they’re living Acts 2:44–45, All that believed were together. Eventually there are problems; people begin to murmur and complain. They have to build some kind of structure; they elect deacons to help take care of the personal problems, they develop rules, etc.

Jesus had commissioned them to go into all the world, to make disciples of all nations. He said that after the Holy Spirit had come, they would be witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and unto the uttermost parts of the world.

They started off in Jerusalem, and from the sounds of it, they had their hands full for a while with so many immediate converts. It took time before they started heading out into the rest of the world. When reading the book of Acts, one can get the impression that these events happened quickly. That they were in Jerusalem getting filled with the Holy Spirit and then a few weeks later they were in Antioch, and not long after that the apostle Paul was taking the Gospel to Turkey and Greece. But actually all of this took years. Most likely there were things they needed to learn while working together to teach, train, and manage all of those first converts—things that would help them do the job when they were going to be more on their own.

The time came when they had to disperse, when the disciples had to go to other lands and other people. They had lived and worked together for years, they had a common history, they were friends, comrades in arms, and now it was time to leave one another, to move on and take the Gospel to new horizons.

Things changed. It was time to head out and to go, perhaps alone or perhaps with a handful of others, to where Christianity didn’t exist, where people hadn’t heard about Jesus. In a sense they had to start all over. They moved away from their friends and didn’t have the backing of large communities. They had to start from scratch, meet new people, witness to them, build a work from the ground up. They needed to survive in a new situation. They had to start witnessing and winning all over again. It must have been terribly lonely. It must have been a huge challenge. It must have been so different from what they were used to. But it was those men and women who brought the Gospel to the places where God had led them to, and who caused the teachings and message of Jesus to be spread throughout the world.

They witnessed, they preached, they taught, they won, they built communities, and the faith carried on. They had to do what they could day by day to bring the faith to others. And they did. It was different from their past. It was probably more difficult, and it no doubt took time for them to start over, to adjust to the changes; but they were committed to doing their part, to doing the mission where God had led them.

He’s still calling His followers to preach the Gospel, to make disciples. He wants to use you to reach your world. Wherever you are, whatever He’s called you to do, you can reach your world, those who are around you, those that He brings across your path.

The Lord wants you to use your gifts in a way that you can brightly shine. You have gifts, talents, and abilities that are unique to you, which make up who you are. God wants you to use them for His glory, for the good of others, to change your world and theirs.

Some people are gifted in music, others in business, some in physically caring for others; some are good at communicating with people, others are experts at caring for children, some are great at listening to others; others have hobbies which make for opportunities to meet others. Whatever your gift, whatever your talent, whatever your passion, the Lord can use it as a means to assist you in reaching others with His love and message.

Besides your talents being used in a way that is a blessing to others, He wants them to be a blessing to you as well. It’s often been said that the ideal job is the job where you can use your gifts, where you can do the things that you are good at and that you enjoy doing. What better way to do the mission throughout your life than combining your talents with bringing people into the kingdom of heaven?

He’s given you those talents, and as disciples, as Christians, He’s called you to reach people. We’re called to share the good news with others. Your mission may be your hometown. Your mission may be a faraway mission field. You are called to “the world” He has led you to, those you interact with, whether it’s at a job, or at a park with your children, or even to your children, or in full-time ministry work. You are called to reach those in your world, those you come into contact with, who may have the same interests or who may belong to the same club you do.

No matter where God has led you in your life, the world around you is your mission field for as long as He has you there. It doesn’t necessarily mean you are going to be engaged in full-time ministry, but as you interact with others, there will be opportunities to meet those you can witness to, pray for, influence for good, bring salvation to, and teach and train.

I imagine that when the disciples went out, when they were more on their own than they had been in the past, they felt alone and wondered how in the world they would make a difference. It was hard, probably discouraging at times, but they witnessed, they preached, they taught, they won others to the Lord, and in time, over the years, they built up communities of believers. They made new networks, new friends, they influenced those around them, and because they did what they could day by day, year after year, Christianity grew and was passed on from generation to generation.

They may have felt alone, but they weren’t. You may feel alone at times in your life, but you’re not. The Lord is with you, and if you’re following Him, going where He’s shown you to go, doing what He’s shown you to do, then you can have the confidence that no matter what the situation is right now, He’s there. He wants to, and will, use you to make a difference in your world.

God wants you to make a difference in your world. You have the opportunity to do so by doing what He’s called you to do, living the life He’s called you to live, letting your light shine, influencing those around you, sowing the seeds of faith in people’s lives, giving them Jesus, walking with them on their spiritual path, and making disciples of those who feel the call. It may take time, but it’s doing your part day by day that’s going to help you change the world around you, by changing the hearts of those the Lord has brought into your life. That’s our calling. That’s the mission.

Originally published October 2011. Adapted and republished January 2014.
Read by Jerry Paladino.


1 Mark 11:9–10 ESV.

Monday, January 6, 2014

Neutral--in Whose Favor?

By Uri Avnery, Counterpunch, Jan. 3, 2014

A former Israeli army Chief of Staff, a man of limited intelligence, was told that a certain individual was an atheist. “Yes,” he asked, “but a Jewish atheist or a Christian atheist?”

Lenin, in his Swiss exile, once inquired about the party affiliation of a newly elected member of the Duma. “Oh, he is just a fool!” his assistant asserted. Lenin answered impatiently: “A fool in favor of whom?”

I am tempted to pose a similar question about people touted to be neutral in our conflict: “Neutral in favor of whom?”

The question came to my mind when I saw an Israeli documentary about the US intermediaries who have tried over the last 40 years or so to broker peace between the Palestinians and us.

For some reason, most of them were Jews.

I am sure that all of them were loyal American citizens, who would have been sincerely offended by any suggestion that they served a foreign country, such as Israel. They honestly felt themselves to be neutral in our conflict.

Bur were they neutral? Are they? Can they be?

My answer is: No, they couldn’t.

Not because they were dishonest. Not because they consciously served one side. Certainly not. Perish the thought!

But for a much deeper reason. They were brought up on the narrative of one side. From childhood on, they have internalized the history and the terminology of one side (ours). They couldn’t even imagine that the other side has a different narrative, with a different terminology.

This does not prevent them from being neutral. Neutral for one side.

By the way, in this respect there is no great difference between American Jews and other Americans. They have generally been brought up on the same history and ideology, based on the Hebrew Bible.

Let us take the latest example. John Kerry is carrying with him a draft plan for the solution of the conflict.

It was prepared meticulously by a staff of experts. And what a staff! One hundred and sixty dedicated individuals!

I won’t ask how many of them are fellow Jews. The very question smacks of anti-Semitism. Jewish Americans are like any other Americans. Loyal to their country. Neutral in our conflict.

Neutral for whom?

Well, let’s look at the plan. Among many other provisions, it foresees the stationing of Israeli troops in the Palestinian Jordan valley. A temporary measure. Only for ten years. After that, Israel will decide whether its security needs have been met. If the answer is negative, the troops will remain for as long as necessary—by Israeli judgment.

For neutral Americans, this sounds quite reasonable. There will be a free and sovereign Palestinian state. The Jordan valley will be part of this state.

If the Palestinians achieve their long-longed-for independence, why should they care about such a bagatelle? If they are not considering military action against Israel, why would they mind?

Logical if you are an Israeli. Or an American. Not if you are a Palestinian.

Because for a Palestinian, the Jordan valley constitutes 20% of their putative state, which altogether consists of 22% of the territory they consider their historical homeland. And because they believe, based on experience, that there is very little chance that Israelis will ever willingly withdraw from a piece of land if they can help it. And because the continued military control of the valley would allow the Israelis to cut the State of Palestine off from any contact with the Arab world, indeed from the world at large.

And, well, there is such a thing as national pride and sovereignty.

Imagine Mexican—or even Canadian—troops stationed on 20% of the territory of the USA. Or French troops in control of 20% of Germany. Or Russian troops in 20% of Poland. Or Serbian troops in Kosovo?

Impossible, you say. So why do American experts take it for granted that Palestinians are different? That they wouldn’t mind?

Because they have a certain conception of Israelis and Palestinians.

The same lack of understanding of the other side is, of course, prevalent in the relations between the two sides themselves.

On the last day of anno 2013, Israel had to release 26 Palestinian prisoners, who had been held since before the 1993 Oslo Accord. This was part of the preliminary agreement achieved by John Kerry for starting the current negotiations.

Every time this happens, there is an outcry in Israel and rejoicing in Palestine. Nothing exemplifies the mental gap between the two peoples more clearly than these contrasting reactions.

For Israelis, these prisoners are vile murderers, despicable terrorists with “blood on their hands”. For Palestinians, they are national heroes, soldiers of the sacred Palestinian cause, who have sacrificed more than 20 years of their young lives for the freedom of their people.

For days, all Israeli networks have reported several times a day on demonstrations of bereaved Israeli mothers, clutching in their hands large photos of their sons and daughters, crying out in anguish against the release of their murderers. And immediately after, scenes in Ramallah and Nablus of the mothers of the prisoners, clutching the portraits of their loved ones, dancing and singing in anticipation of their arrival.

Many Israelis were cringing at this sight. But the editors and anchormen would be astonished if they were told that they were inciting the people against the prisoner release, and—indirectly—against the peace negotiations. Why? How? Just honest reporting!

This revulsion at the other side’s rejoicing seems to be an ancient reaction. The Bible tells us that after King Saul was killed in the war against the Philistines, King David lamented: “Tell it not in Gath, publish it not in the streets of Askelon (both Philistine towns) ; lest the daughters of the Philistines rejoice, lest the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph.” (II Samuel. 1:20)

Binyamin Netanyahu went further. He made a speech denouncing the Palestinian leadership. How could they organize these demonstrations of joy? What does that say about the sincerity of Mahmoud Abbas? How could they rejoice at the sight of these abominable murderers, who had slaughtered innocent Jews? Doesn’t this prove that they are not serious about seeking peace, that they are all unreformed terrorists at heart, out for Jewish blood? So we cannot give up any security measures for a long, long time.

The prisoners themselves, when interviewed by Israeli TV immediately after their release, argued in excellent Hebrew (learned in prison) that the main thing was to achieve peace. When asked, one of them said: “Is there a single Israeli, from Netanyahu down, who hasn’t killed Arabs?”

The gap of perceptions is, to my mind, the largest obstacle to peace.

This week Netanyahu gave us another beautiful example. He spoke about the continued incitement against Israel in Palestinian schoolbooks. This item of right-wing Israeli propaganda pops up every time the other tired arguments are let out to grass.

How can there be peace, Netanyahu exclaimed, if Palestinian children learn in their classes that Haifa and Nazareth are part of Palestine? This means that they are educated to destroy Israel!

This is so impertinent, that one can only gasp. I don’t think that there exists a single Hebrew schoolbook that does not mention the fact that Jericho and Hebron are part of Eretz Israel. To change this one would have to abolish the Bible.

Haifa and Hebron, Jericho and Nazareth are all part of the same country, called Palestine in Arabic and Eretz Israel in Hebrew. They are all deeply rooted in the consciousness of both peoples. A compromise between them does not mean that they give up their historical memories, but that they agree to partition the country into two political entities.

Netanyahu and his ilk cannot imagine this, and therefore they are unable to make peace. On the Palestinian side there are certainly many people who also find this impossible, or too painful.

I wonder if Irish schoolbooks have obliterated 400 years of English domination or abomination. I doubt it. I also wonder how English schoolbooks treat this chapter of their history.

In any case, if an independent (neutral?) commission of experts were to examine all the schoolbooks in Israel and Palestine, they would find very little difference between them. Of Israel’s four main school systems (national, national-religious, western-orthodox and eastern-orthodox), at least the three religious ones are so nationalist-racist that a Palestinian competitor would be hard-pressed to trump them. None of them says anything about the existence of a Palestinian people, not to mention any rights on the country they may possess. God forbid (literally)!

To be more than a mere fragile armistice, peace needs reconciliation. See: Mandela.

Reconciliation is impossible if either side is totally oblivious to the narrative of the other, their history, beliefs, perceptions, myths.

John Kerry does not need 160 or 1600 experts, neutral or otherwise. He needs one good psychologist. Or maybe two.

One can easily understand the feelings of a mother whose son was killed by a Palestinian militant. If one tries, one can also understand the feelings of a mother whose son was ordered by his leaders to attack Israelis and who returns from prison after 30 years.

Only if the American intermediaries, neutral or otherwise, understand both can they contribute to furthering peace.

Friday, January 3, 2014

Thursday, January 2, 2014

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Van Til's Life And Impact By Dr. Greg Bahnsen

Penpoint VI:5 (May, 1995) © Covenant Media Foundation, 800/553-3938

Cornelius Van Til may not have seemed a likely candidate to accomplish a "Reformation of Christian Apologetics," but God is in the habit of utilizing unlikely candidates to mount great victories for His kingdom. Van Til "wanted to be a farmer.... Instead he became one of the foremost Christian apologists of our time," to use the words of David Kucharsky in Christianity Today (Dec. 30, 1977, p. 18).

Van Til was born May 3, 1895, in Grootegast, Holland, as the sixth of eight children to a devout dairyman-farmer. At the age of ten his family sailed to America and settled in Indiana. Cornelius enjoyed the soil and animals, but his evident intellectual strengths got him sent to Calvin Preparatory School in 1914.

He worked his way through as a part-time janitor and wholly loved the study of philosophy. By the time he enrolled in Calvin Seminary in 1921, he was already familiar with the works of Abraham Kuyper and Herman Bavinck and had added a knowledge of Hebrew, Greek, and Latin to his Dutch and English! He studied systematic theology under Louis Berkhof and Christian philosophy under W. H. Jellema. During his first year of seminary J. Gresham Machen - the man who stood head and shoulders above others as presenting a Christian faith worthy of scholarly defense - published The Origin of Paul's Religion.

The next year Van Til transferred to Princeton where he could study with Machen as well as at the philosophy department of Princeton University (under the Scottish personalist, A. A. Bowman). At the seminary Van Til managed the student dining club, and lived on the same floor in Alexander Hall with "Das" Machen, who was busy publishing numerous apologetical studies (including his monumental Christianity and Liberalism [1923]). Van Til's seminary adviser, C. W. Hodge Jr., was a grandson of Charles Hodge and the successor to B. B. Warfield. Van Til profited from the solid Biblical instruction of men like Hodge, Robert Dick Wilson, William Park Armstrong, and Oswald T. Allis, but the professor closest to his heart was Geerhardus Vos, the respected Dutch scholar who championed the method of "Biblical theology."

Van Til won the prize-winning student papers for both 1923 (on evil and theodicy) and 1924 (on the will and its theological relations). The seminary granted him a Th.M. in systematic theology in 1925, after which he married his long-time sweetheart, Rena Klooster. At the university Van Til's prowess in metaphysical analysis and mastery of Hegel's philosophy had gained high praise from A. A. Bowman, who offered him a graduate fellowship.

In 1927 the university granted him the Ph.D. in philosophy for a dissertation on "God and the Absolute." In the same year his first published piece (a review of A. N. Whitehead's Religion in the Making) clearly exhibited the salient lines of presuppositional analysis: (a) locating an opponent's crucial presuppositions, (b) criticizing the autonomous attitude which arises from a failure to honor the Creator-creature distinction, (c) exposing the internal and destructive philosophical tensions which attend autonomy, and then (d) setting forth the only viable alternative, Biblical Christianity.

When J. Gresham Machen declined the chair of apologetics at Princeton Seminary, deciding to remain in the New Testament department, the Board of the seminary was encouraged by William Brenton Greene (1854-1928), the retired professor of apologetics, to invite Van Til to lecture in the department for the 1928-1929 academic year. Following the reception of his doctorate and his first visit back to the Netherlands (1927), Van Til had accepted the pastorate of the Christian Reformed Church in Spring Lake, Michigan. Although installed for only a year, he took a leave of absence from the congregation and taught apologetics at Princeton, impressing everyone so favorably (even though the youngest instructor there) that at the end of only one year the Board elected him to assume the Stuart Chair of apologetics and ethics. However, within weeks the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. reorganized Princeton Seminary in such a way that control of the once conservative bastion of Reformed orthodoxy was turned over to men who desired to see many different viewpoints represented at Princeton and who favored a "broad church." Machen resigned and immediately started work to establish Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. Van Til likewise resigned and returned to Michigan.

In the mean time, Machen handpicked Van Til to teach apologetics in the new seminary, even traveling with Ned B. Stonehouse to Michigan in August to plead for Van Til's acceptance of the position - after a previous visit from O. T. Allis had not secured it. After declining at first, Van Til took up teaching duties at Westminster Seminary in the fall of 1929, where he continued in that ministry until retiring more than forty years later. When Machen was unjustly forced out of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. in 1936, Van Til supported him in the founding of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, where he came to have a decided influence for years to come, both as a scholar and as a powerful pulpit preacher.

From the outset of his teaching career Van Til sought to develop a distinctively, consistently Christian philosophical outlook. He wanted to see everything in terms of a Biblical world-and-life-view. The first major syllabus produced by Van Til at Westminster Seminary, (now titled A Survey of Christian Epistemology) in 1933. In it he traced through history various epistemological positions, noting the bearing of metaphysical convictions upon them, and advanced the necessity of a transcendental, presuppositional method of argumentation. He insisted that Christians must reason with unbelievers, seeking to reduce the non-Christian worldview (whatever form it takes) to absurdity - by exposing it to be epistemologically and morally self-contradictory. Van Til's insight, a brilliant and apologetically powerful one, was that antitheism actually presupposes theism. To reason at all, the unbeliever must operate on assumptions which actually contradict his espousedpresuppositions - assumptions which comport only with the Christian worldview.

Van Til's presuppositional approach has been a powerful impetus for reform in Christian thinking. Outwardly, it directs a transcendental challenge to all philosophies which fall short of a Biblical theory of knowledge, demonstrating that their worldviews do not provide the philosophical preconditions needed for the intelligible use of logic, science, or ethics. Inwardly, it calls for self-examination by Christian scholars and apologists to see if their own theories of knowledge have been self-consciously developed in subordination to the word of God which they wish to vindicate or apply. It has likewise cut a wide swath through a large number of relevant areas of interest, requiring that every area of life be governed by the inscripturated word of God.

Those who knew Dr. Van Til personally will testify that he was not only a man of principle and conviction, a towering intellectual, but equally a man of warmth, humor, and compassion. On April 17, 1987, he joined all the saints who from their labors rest.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith