Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Bible Prophecy - Mathematically Impossible!

by Dennis Edwards

At the end of the New Testament in the first verse in the Book of Revelation, we find the following words,

1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John.[1]

At the end of the revelation, John tries to worship the angel who brought him the end-time message. The angel says,

10 See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. [2]

A testimony is a document that confirms the will of the testifier. Like a person’s will is a document giving evidence or proof or testament to his desires. The spirit of prophecy found in the Bible is the testament or proof or evidence that Jesus is God. The accuracy of God’s prophecies confirms or testifies that Jesus is the Christ. The accuracy of God’s prophecies confirms or testifies to the fact that the Bible is true.

In my condensed Bible concordance I can find some 48 Old Testament Messianic prophecies, or prophecies concerning the coming of the Jewish Messiah, all of which were fulfilled in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Nowhere in all of ancient Greek and Latin literature can there be found any real specific prophecy of a great historical event to come in the distant future. To the contrary, the Bible is full of countless, detailed, specific prophecies, all of which have been miraculously fulfilled and come true—except the final End-time prophecies which are either to be fulfilled in the near future or are coming to pass right now.[3]

What would be the chance of one person just happening to fulfill all 48 prophecies by chance?

After researching, I have found some interesting information. In 1957 Peter W. Stoner, a university professor at Pasadena City College in California, did a study of the possibility of one person fulfilling 48 of the nearly 300 to 350 Messianic prophecies. His work was published in 1957 by Moody Press in Chicago, Illinois and was titled SCIENCE SPEAKS, An Evaluation of Certain Christian Evidences.[4] The research was done with the help of the students from twelve different classes who were taking a course on Christian Evidence.

First Professor Stoner, with the help of each Evidence class, estimated the odds for just eight of the Messianic prophecies being fulfilled by one man. They made “reasonable and conservative estimates” which the students agreed upon unanimously. For example, they tried to figure out the odds of a child born in Bethlehem at the beginning of the first century becoming the Messiah. What were the odds of three wise men would come from the east and bestow gifts on the child and his family? What were the odds that they same child would escape the slaying of the male children of Bethlehem by Herod the Great? What were the odds of that child traveling specifically to Egypt and then returning later to live in Nazareth so that later he would be called a Nazarene?

Stoner then took the average result for each of the possible eight prophecies calculated by the twelve different classes. By multiplying the probability that was found for one of the prophecies by the other seven prophecies, he came up with the probability of one man fulfilling all eight prophecies.[5]

Making the reasonable and conservative assumption that the other forty prophetic possibilities would have nearly the same rate of probability, he did the math. He found that the odds of one person fulfilling all 48 prophecies would be 1 in 10 to the 157th power or one over 10 followed by 157 zeros, or one chance out of

10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

French Mathematician Emil Borel suggested in the late 1950’s that a number with a probability of 10-50, or one in ten to the fiftieth power, represents “a negligible event on the cosmic scale.”[6] Therefore 10 to the negative 157 would be even less negligible. It’s just beyond possibility for one person to accidentally fulfill all 48 prophecies of the some 300-350 total Messianic prophecies found in the Bible. Nevertheless, Jesus did.

Attorney Lee Stroebel, the former agnostic journalist with the Chicago Tribune, who had received Illinois’ highest honor for public service in investigating reporting from United Press International, said in 2007 that statistical information presented in Professor Stoner’s Science Speaks about the Messianic prophecies was one of the factors which gave him confidence to believe in Christ. Lee went on to become a New York Times besting-selling author with his books The Case for Christ, The Case for Faith and The Case for Easter.[7]

Footnotes:

[1] Revelation 1:1

[2] Revelation 19:10b

[3] Treasures, World Services, Zurich, Switzerland, 1987, pg.19.

[4] http://dstoner.net/Science_Speaks/Science_Speaks.html

[5]http://www.bereanpublishers.com/the-odds-of-eight-messianic-prophecies-coming-true/ ; http://jvmi.co.uk/who-is-yeshua/reasons-to-believe/prophecies.html

[6] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/borelfaq.html

[7] http://www.leestrobel.com/Bio.php

Scientist fired from university after discovering shocking dinosaur bones believed to be only 4,000 years old

http://www.naturalnews.com/046315_dinosaur_fossils_soft_tissue_wrongful_termination.html#

Tuesday, August 05, 2014 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer
Tags: dinosaur fossils, soft tissue, wrongful termination

(NaturalNews) A recent archaeological discovery that throws a wrench into the conventional theory of evolution has reportedly cost a California professor his job. Mark Armitage, a former scientist at California State University, Northridge (CSUN), was reportedly fired after claiming to have unearthed a dinosaur fossil that still contains soft, flexible tissue, suggesting that it can't be millions of years old.

A 30-year veteran in his field, Armitage has published many studies over the years in peer-reviewed journals. One of his most recent was published last July, pertaining to a discovery he made at the Hell Creek Formation excavation site in Montana. According to The Christian Post, Armitage was evaluating a triceratops horn fossil when he came across preserved soft tissue.

A lawsuit recently filed in Armitage's defense describes his reaction to the discovery as "fascinated," since flexible matter has never before been discovered on a dinosaur fossil. Naturally, Armitage published his findings -- in this case, he published them in the Elsevier journal Acta Histochemica -- and proceeded to share his findings with his students.

Not long after, Armitage was approached by a CSUN faculty head who reportedly shouted at him, "We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department!" Armitage's finding, of course, contradicts the evolutionary theory that CSUN has embraced for decades, and there doesn't appear to be any room for discussion on the matter, since he was also let go from his position.

"Terminating an employee because of [his] religious views is completely inappropriate and illegal," stated Armitage's lawyer, Brad Dacus, in a public statement. "But doing so in an attempt to silence scientific speech at a public university is even more alarming. This should be a wakeup call and warning to the entire world of academia."

NC paleontologist claims to have explanation for soft tissue, but even this is just a theory

Concerning Armitage's discovery, molecular paleontologist Mary Schweitzer from North Carolina State University (NCSU) claims to have come up with a valid explanation that, though unprovable, is making the media rounds. In a story published by The Huffington Post, Stephanie Pappas explained that iron in dinosaurs' blood may have a preservative effect on soft tissue.

According to the report, Schweitzer and her colleagues had discovered soft tissue in the fossilized leg of a Tyrannosaurus rex, which she says was unusually soft and still transparent for being supposedly 68 million years old. But because its free radical oxidation potential can have an effect similar to formaldehyde, the chemical used in embalming, iron in the creature's blood may have preserved the soft tissue in ways previously undiscovered.

"The problem is, for 300 years, we thought, 'Well, the organics are all gone, so why should we look for something that's not going to be there?' and nobody looks," was Schweitzer's explanation as to why soft tissue hasn't been observed in other fossil excavations.

At the same time, Schweitzer's explanation for the preservation of soft tissue on dinosaur bones is still just a theory, and one that supporters of Armitage say ignores the presence of radioactive carbon-14 in dinosaur fossils. Carbon-14 (C-14) dating of dinosaur bones collected from many different sites across the U.S. have revealed that, at most, these bones are only 39,000 years old.

"Dinosaur bones with Carbon-14 dates in the range of 22,000 to 39,000 years before present, combined with the discovery of soft tissue in dinosaur bones, indicate that something is wrong with the conventional wisdom about dinosaurs," says New Geology.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.christianpost.com

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com

http://www.sciencedirect.com

http://www.huffingtonpost.com

http://newgeology.us

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046315_dinosaur_fossils_soft_tissue_wrongful_termination.html##ixzz39XhLKKNE

SCIENCE SPEAKS: Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of Prophecy and the Bible

http://dstoner.net/Science_Speaks/index.html#c4

The above link will take you the on-line book by Professor Peter Stoner. Below is a capsule summary. I found this book very interesting and worth a read.

by Peter W. Stoner

In this revised edition of Science Speaks Professor Stoner examines the findings of science and the Genesis account of creation. He considers the day by day order of creation and shows the accuracy of Moses' record. The well-accepted principle of probability is applied to Bible prophecy. A fascinating discussion centers around Ezekiel's prophecy concerning Tyre, Micah's predictions about Samaria, and Jeremiah's utterances dealing with Moab, Ammon and Babylon. Attention is given to Old Testament prophecy which finds fulfillment in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ.


The attack by critics of the Bible has often come in the name of science. Faith has been threatened because the Bible has been thought to be in serious error. Today, through the efforts of Christian scientists, items of conflict between science and the scriptures are being harmonized. The evidence continues to accumulate in favor of the Bible as the product of Divine intelligence. Science Speaks is an enlightening comparison of Biblical truth and the established scientific data.

The book can also be found on-line in Spanish at the following link:

http://dstoner.net/Science_Speaks/spanish/CienciaHabla.html

Monday, August 4, 2014

The Music is the Message or the Sirens of Babylon!

By Dennis Edwards --

Another aspect of Babylon the Whore in the book of Revelation is her music ministry. In one of the last verses in chapter eighteen which depicts the destruction of Babylon, we see what could be interpreted as the destruction of the music and entertainment industry.

And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, shall be heard no more at all in thee.[1]

In the same chapter we also have read that Babylon was “the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit.”[2]

Jesus has shown us that words are actually spiritual in nature and therefore spiritual forces. He said, “The words I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life.”[3]

Words are real things. They bless or they curse. They lift up or they pull down.

Death and life are in the power of the tongue,[4] for out of the abundance of the heart does the mouth speaks.[5]

James even wrote a whole chapter about the tongue. The subject of the tongue is worth our while reviewing because it is a very important part of a successful life. Here it is for you to meditate on.


1 My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.2 For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body.
3 Behold, we put bits in the horses' mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body.
4 Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth.
5 Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!
6 And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.
7 For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind:
8 But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.

9 Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.

10 Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.11 Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?
12 Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.
13 Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom.
14 But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.
15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.

16 For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.
17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.18 And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.[6]

Are you bringing peace to the world with your words, or strife and division?

Jesus said,

36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. [7]

He also said, “The word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.”[8]

In other words, if we have heard God’s word and rejected it, we will be accountable for its truth whether we choose to believe it or not. Like James has said,“To him that knows to do good and does it not, to him it is sin.”[9]

In another discourse Jesus said,


Not which goes into the mouth defiles a man; but that which comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man. Do not you understand that whatsoever enters into the mouth goes into the belly, and is cast out into the draught? 
But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man. 
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, and blasphemies: these are the things which defile a man.[10]


That which goes into a man is not what condemns him, but that which comes out of a man. Could the music industry, with its capital in America and its often open rebellion against God and traditional American values and morals be a foul spirit with its perverse lyrics promoting suicide, sex, violence, and Satanist Aleister Crowley’s “Do all that you will” philosophy. Could the music and television and movie industry be polluting the world with the words they pour out against God and all that is called godly?

In the past America has produced a lot of good movies and a lot of good music like the protest music of the 60s and 70s. Let’s take a look at some of the songs from the Viet Nam war period and afterwards. Bryan McGuire sang one of my favorites called “Eve of Destruction.”[11]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4rYJoVILjo P.F.Sloan, who wrote the song, gave various metaphors showing that it certainly seemed like the world was headed for destruction. I am sorry I cannot include the lyrics here but because of copyright laws you will have to check them out on the internet if you are not familiar with them. Even today when we watch the evening news, it certainly seems like the world is on the eve of destruction.

The Sloan/McGuire song reminds me of the words from Paul,

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God, having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away….Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth….But evil men shall wax worse and worse deceiving and being deceive. [12]

In earlier song by Peter Seeger and L. Hays from the ‘60s called “If I Had a Hammer,”[13]  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5G4YPNGnVE the authors sing a song of godly warning of the danger approaching our land because of the lack of love between people, the lack of justice and true freedom.

The song brings to my mind the words of Moses who said,

Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous. That which is altogether just shall thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. [14]

The Lord through Jeremiah said something similar many years later.

Thus saith the Lord; Excute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.[15]

Seeger and Hays are calling out for someone to hammer out righteous judgment against the evil which we see so prevalent in the world today. I think it is a universal sentiment within us which yearns for true justice and liberty for all mankind. It is certainly what we find in the writings of Moses and Jeremiah and the other prophets in both the Old and New Testaments.

In the song “People Got to Be Free,” [16] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxkwlnesPe4 with words by Felix Cavaliere and music by Edward Brigati, Jr., we find a simple melody reminding us that people everywhere just want to be free. They don’t want big business. They don’t want big government. They don’t want big wars. They just really want to live in peace and harmony.

Sad to say, because of man’s sinful nature, and the lust and greed of evil men, those days of peace and harmony will not be reached until God himself enters once again into our reality during the 1000 year reign of Christ on earth. But even that wonderful Millennium period will end in war and destruction until God forms a new heaven and new earth where,

God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain; for the former things are passed away.[17]

Finally there will be peace on earth and goodwill towards men.

In Bob Dylan’s “Blowing in the Wind,” [18]  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWwgrjjIMXA he contemplates in sadness how man seems incapable of learning from the past. Like Arnold Toynbee the famous historian said quoting from Hegel,

The only thing we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.[19]

I remember singing Dylan’s song as I sat contemplating my own life and the decision I, as a young adult, had to make concerning the war in Vietnam. Besides the words of Jesus, it was the songs of that era which gave me faith to resist the draft and refuse to become part of America’s war machine against the poor nations of the world. Country Joe and the Fish had a great song in 1-2-3-What Are We Fighting For?[20]  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuUBCF3KKxc And there were many others.

As Solomon wrote,

Sorrow is better than laughter: for by the sadness of the countenance the heart is made better.[21]
The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth.[22]

I had gotten a very low lottery draft number and was surely headed for the war after my college deferment ended. Nevertheless, the sorrow of heart that I experienced during my college years, wondering what I should do, caused me to seek desperately for answers to life’s big questions. That sorrow caused me to search for truth and in the end I found God.

In the song “He Ain’t Heavy, He’s My Brother,”[23] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT57tjz9py8
by B.Scott and B.Russell, we could hear the heart cry of youth of those years who rejected the dog eat dog values of modern society and yearned to live in brotherly love. As Jesus said, “No greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”[24]

And John so aptly puts,


11 For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous.
13 Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.
14 We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.
15 Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
16 Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.

17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?
18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.[25]

Scott and Russell’s song reminds me of the old Indian story from the Himalayan Mountains.[26] I believe it is a true story. Two men were travelling in the mountains when a terrible storm broke out. With much difficulty they struggle on in hope of finding shelter and safety in the next mountain village. As they travel, they come upon the body of a man dying from cold, unable to go forward. The men debate on whether they should stop and help this wearied stranger who was as good as dead already. But they are not able to come to an agreement.

Finally one walks off in disgust claiming they could barely save their own lives, let alone help some other poor cap nearly dead anyway. The other traveler, however, feels the conviction of heart to stop and help that weakened soul. In great effort he manages to lift the nearly frozen man to his shoulders and more slowly than before struggles forward.

Soon, the extra effort and friction of the frozen man’s body against his own causes his own body to warm up. The weary traveler’s body also began to revive from the same heat. Shortly, they come across the frozen body of the man who had refused to help. He had walked off in defiance to save his own life only to die alone without the help of others. In the end, the dying man wasn’t so heavy after all, but was the salvation of the man who took compassion upon him, a good lesson for us all, and similar to the message of Scott and Russell’s song “He Ain’t Heavy, He’s My Brother.”

Simon and Garfunkel’s song, “Bridge Over Troubled Waters,”[27] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-PNun-Pfb4 is another one of those nearly prophetic songs of that bye-gone era. I once saw the song performed by a Kenyan National Dance group, while on a humanitarian trip to Mozambique. We had been invited to the National Dance Theater in downtown Maputo to watch Mozambique’s National Dance Troupe perform a dance rendering the country’s defeat of the Portuguese imperialistic power. It was a war drudge if ever I saw one honoring the National Police among whom we sat.

However, after an unentertaining hour of Africans dancing to war rhythms, we were pleasantly surprised by the beautiful rendition of “Bridge Over Troubled Waters,” by the visiting Kenyan dancers. The two renditions were like night and day. One was of war, while the other was of love and compassion. The words of Simon and Garfunkel’s song seemed as if God was speaking, His Holy Spirit calling down comforting words of assurance. God would himself be the bridge over troubled waters and as Jesus had laid down his life, so His Holy Spirit would be with us to help us in our moments of trial and difficulty and encourage us to be bridges over troubled waters for one another.

Even a Coca Cola commercial in the early 1970’s gave a message of peace and love. The song “I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing,” [28] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ib-Qiyklq-Q sung by the Hillside Singers had a cute little rhythm but promoted world-wide brotherly love in a commercial. The mass media can in fact be used for good.

Of course you all remember the lyrics of John Lennon and Paul McCartney’s “All You Need Is Love.” [29] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-pFAFsTFTI That was all we really needed at that time, love. That was all we felt the whole world needed, love. That’s what we thought was the solution to the world’s problems, love; love for God and love for fellow man. As Jesus said, “A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye love one another.”[30]

Paul goes on to say, “All the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.” [31]

Paul went on to write one of the most beautiful and thought provoking chapters in the entire Bible, which I will reprint here for your reflection and encouragement. I will leave it in the original King James for copyright reasons, although I’ll drop some of the “ths.” But I suggest when reading, you use the word LOVE instead of CHARITY for better clarity.


1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity (love), I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity (love), I am nothing.
3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity (love), it profiteth me nothing.
4 Charity (Love) suffers long, and is kind; charity (love) envies not; charity (love) vaunts not itself, is not puffed up,
5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeks not her own, is not easily provoked, thinks no evil;
6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth;
7 Bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
8 Charity (love) never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
13 And now abides faith, hope, charity (love), these three; but the greatest of these is charity (love). [32]



The songs which I have mentioned above surely have a Christian element in them. Some admittedly have more than others. They were very popular songs sung during the 60s to 80s with a powerful affect on their audience, you and me. Surely they were more meaningful than much of what is presently being pumped out by the music industry.


But perhaps today’s music is a fulfillment of Jesus’ own words which he spoke to his disciples when he was asked, “What shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?”[33]

Part of Jesus’ replies was, “And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.”[34]Are we seeing the love of many waxing cold even in the songs we listen to for entertainment?

Let me continue in my argument. I have previously applied the following verse to the banking system in an earlier article.

For thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.[35]

But another element of the sorceries helping to deceive the whole world could clearly be the music and entertainment industry which promotes materialism and the worship of money and the things that money can buy. The Bilderberg group contains financial barons and those who own the movie and television industries among others. The music and entertainment industry promotes self worship and even an open worship of or fascination with the dark side and Satan himself. Could the sorceries that deceive the nations be in fact the power of the mass media: music, television, radio, video, computer games, etc.? Are there spiritual realities behind these devices, inspiring them?

Scotland’s Alan Watt, author of radio show and website “Cutting Through the Matrix,” says,

Never watch the television. Never watch the television. It’s the greatest scientific indoctrination tool ever devised. Have you figured that out? It has changed the whole culture of nations, not just one nation. Why do you think it was mandatory that everyone have access to televisions in Britain by the government? Why do you think China is under the same program right now, because they love to be entertained? Do you really believe that? Most of your ideas and opinions come from television, because you mimic what you see. Never watch the television. You can’t even watch a movie unless you do it critically.[36]  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmBymKXgrV4

Could the mass media with music, television, radio, video, computer games, rock concerts etc., be the “sirens” of today’s modern world? The Sirens of Greek mythology were beautiful woman who “sat on the shore and sang with voices seductive and compelling that anyone who heard their song became absolutely mesmerized with them. So mesmerized, in fact, that they became obsessed with reaching the shore to get closer to the sound.”[37]But the sailors were being deceived as the Sirens were actually some sort of beasts luring the sailors to their death.

The term "siren" is used both in ancient and modern mythology, as well as in modern language in general, to describe something that is simultaneously dangerous and compelling. In later myths and legends, any creature that lured a man in only to cause harm might be considered "a siren" in the general context of the term.[38]

Were the ancient Greek mythologies actually warning us of the spiritual realities and how music and beauty can be part of it? Is it any wonder that today’s top musicians are beautiful woman many of which use all their seductive sexual charms to lore us into accepting the message of their music which may in fact be dangerous to us spiritually? Are the beautiful actresses or handsome actors on television or in the movies there for the same reason, to get us to accept the message that is being propagated?

I propose that America is deceiving the world with her sorceries. America is contaminating the world through her ungodly music. She is contaminating the world through her ungodly television programs, movies and addictive computer programs. America is contaminating the world through her humanistic, atheistic, anti-God philosophy found in education, science, economics, and politics and propagated in the movies, music, television programs for both old and young alike.

Surely it is by the “sorcery” of modern mass media and the internet that the world is being convinced that violent acts are a normal day occurrence, that traditional sexual limits are out of fashion and restrictive, that the worship of material things, and man himself will bring ultimate happiness and fulfillment. Man is being convinced that God is dead and man through his own evolutionary process will succeed in bringing peace on earth and good will to all men without the need of God or the supernatural myths of our unenlightened ancestors. May God help us!

For those interested in watching a documentary about the Satanic side of Hollywood view the following links entitled Hollywood Unmasked part one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u1z0NDZy5U and part two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B9FCqAM4Lk by Dr.Jason Kovar.

Footnotes:

[1] Revelation 18:22
[2] Revelation 18:2
[3] John 6:63
[4] Proverbs 18:21
[5] Matthew 12:34
[6] James 3:1-18
[7] Matthew 12:36-37
[8] John 12:48
[9] James 4:7
[10] Matthew 15:11, 17-20
[11] P. F. Sloan, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4rYJoVILjo
[12] 2 Timothy 3:1-5, 7 & 13
[13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5G4YPNGnVE
[14] Deuteronomy 16:19-20
[15] Jeremiah 22:3
[16]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxkwlnesPe4
[17] Revelation 21:4
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWwgrjjIMXA
[19] https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/6188.Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel
[20] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuUBCF3KKxc
[21] Ecclesiates 7:3
[22] Ecclesiates 7:4
[23] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT57tjz9py8
[24] John 15:13
[25] 1 John 3:11-18
[26] Simon Peterson, How To Win, Aurora productions.com
[27] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-PNun-Pfb4
[28] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ib-Qiyklq-Q
[29] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-pFAFsTFTI
[30] John 13:34
[31] Galatians 5:14
[32] 1 Corinthians 13:1-13
[33] Matthew 24:3b
[34] Matthew 24:12
[35] Revelation 18:23
[36] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmBymKXgrV4
[37]http://www.gods-and-monsters.com/sirens-mythology.html
[38] ibid

Get moving: Doctor warns we are ‘sitting ourselves to death’

Catherine Garcia, The Week, Aug. 1, 2014

In words that will strike fear in the heart of lazy people everywhere, Dr. James Levine says that sitting around could be worse for your health than smoking.

In his new book Get Up!, the director of the Mayo Clinic-Arizona State University Obesity Solutions Initiative writes that people lose two hours of life for every hour spent sitting. He says it’s not hard to get moving, and even taking a short walk after dinner is better than doing nothing. “On one hand, the good news is that this is incredibly easy,” he told the Los Angeles Times. For those that are tied to their computers for eight hours a day, though, “it’s incredibly difficult.”

In his book, Levine talks about nonexercise activity thermogenesis, or NEAT. This is the energy expenditure of an activity that isn’t a sport, like going for a walk or shoveling snow. Someone with a job that keeps them moving and active uses more NEAT calories, and “low NEAT is linked to weight gain, diabetes, heart attacks, and cancer.” He thinks employers are starting to understand that their workers can’t be sitting down all day, and that soon they’ll learn “you will make money if your workforce gets up and gets moving. Your kids will get better grades if they get up and get moving. The science is not refuted.”

Until everyone is free to frolic all day, the most important thing they can do is get up whenever they are able. “Sitting is more dangerous than smoking, kills more people than HIV and is more treacherous than parachuting,” Levine said. “We are sitting ourselves to death.”

Sunday, August 3, 2014

The Media’s Pro-Israel Bias: Why Does TV News Look Like a Netanyahu Ad?

By Chris McGreal, The Guardian, July 31, 2014

Here are a few questions you won’t hear asked of the parade of Israeli officials crossing US television screens during the current crisis in Gaza:

What would you do if a foreign country was occupying your land?

What does it mean that Israeli cabinet ministers deny Palestine’s right to exist?

What should we make of a prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, who as opposition leader in the 1990s was found addressing rallies under a banner reading “Death to Arabs”?

These are contentious questions, to be sure, and with complicated answers. But they are relevant to understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict today. They also parallel the issues routinely raised by American journalists with Palestinian officials, pressing to consider how the US would react if it were under rocket fire from Mexico, to explain why Hamas won’t recognise Israel and to repudiate Palestinian anti-Semitism.

But it’s a feature of much mainstream journalism in the US, not just an issue of coverage during the last three weeks of the Gaza crisis, that while one set of questions gets asked all the time, the other is heard hardly at all.

In years of reporting from and about Israel, I’ve followed the frequently robust debate in its press about whether Netanyahu really wants a peace deal, about the growing power of right-wing members inside the Israeli cabinet opposed to a Palestinian state, about the creeping air of permanence to the occupation.

So it has been all the more striking to discover a far narrower discourse in Washington and the notoriously pro-Israel mainstream media in the US at a time when difficult questions are more important than ever. John Kerry, the US secretary of state, and a crop of foreign leaders have ratcheted up warnings that the door for the two-state solution is closing, in no small part because of Israel’s actions. But still the difficult questions go unasked.

Take Netanyahu’s appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. The host, Bob Schieffer, permitted the Israeli leader to make a lengthy case for the his military’s ground attack, guiding him along with one sympathetic question after another. Finally, after describing Netanyahu’s position as “very understandable”, Schieffer asked about dead Palestinian civilians—but only to wonder if they presented a public relations problem in “the battle for world opinion”.

As if Schieffer’s position wasn’t already blindingly clear, he went on to quote former prime minister Golda Meir’s line that Israelis can never forgive Arabs “for forcing us to kill their children”.

As way of balance, CBS followed with a short clip of an interview by Charlie Rose with the Hamas leader, Khaled Meshaal, who was pressed on his willingness to recognise Israel.

There has been fine reporting from on the ground in Gaza by courageous American journalists who have laid bare the price being paid by ordinary Palestinians. That, in turn, has prompted some stiff questioning in American TV studios of Israeli officials about the scale of civilian deaths and shelling of schools and hospitals. Some pro-Israel American pundits admit to have becoming “less pro-Israel”.

But the broader framework of how the conflict is presented in the US is more troubling.

Former MSNBC contributor Rula Jebreal drew widespread attention to the media divide when she condemned NBC News on air, on MSNBC, for pulling its only Arab-American correspondent, Ayman Mohyeldin, out of Gaza, only to reinstate him because of the backlash. “We are disgustingly biased on this issue,” she said.

She has a point.

An analysis by Punditfact of CNN coverage during the first two weeks of the latest Gaza crisis showed that appearances by Israeli officials outnumbered Palestinian officials by more than four-to-one. There were substantially more interviews with what Punditfact called Palestinian “laymen”, but they included the relatives of a Palestinian-American beaten by Israeli soldiers that offered little insight into the bigger picture.

All appearances by Palestinian officials were outnumbered by interviews with a single man: Israel’s former ambassador to the US, Michael Oren, whom CNN hired as a Middle East analyst earlier this year. The network presents Oren as a kind of neutral interpreter, when just a few months ago he was vigorously defending Israel on behalf of Netanyahu’s government. His limited value as an analyst was swiftly exposed by his assertion that Hamas was trying to get Israel to kill as many Palestinian children as possible as part of a media strategy.

Palestinians should face difficult questions about recognition of Israel, about Hamas’s policies and actions, about how peace would work in practice.

Israel’s preferred representatives in the US media—Oren, plus the Israeli ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, and Netanyahu’s spokesman, Mark Regev—all project the country as a liberal democracy, an unwilling occupier that is thirsting for peace.

But that does not fit with the views of leading politicians back in Israel. Naftali Bennett, the economy minister and leader of the most powerful political party on the right, has said: “I will do everything in my power to make sure [the Palestinians] never get a state.”

Danny Danon, the increasingly powerful chairman of the central committee of Netanyahu’s Likud party, openly opposes a Palestinian state and has said the prime minister doesn’t believe in it either. “I want the majority of the land with the minimum amount of Palestinians,” Danon, whom Netanyahu just fired as deputy defense minister for being critical of opposition to a ceasefire, told me last year.

And Israel’s ultranationalist foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, wants a good chunk of Israel’s Arab population stripped of citizenship.

Perhaps none of these men will get what they want. But they hold important levers of power, and good journalism would seem to demand that probing questions get asked about where Israel is headed under such leadership.

It’s no secret that younger Americans do not rely on the nightly news, cable networks or printed newspapers for information in the way many older people do. The internet has opened access to foreign news media, which often has a different take in Israel, and has opened up a stream of links to first-hand accounts as well as writing by analysts and activists who offer insights and information wilfully ignored by the Bob Schieffers and Sean Hannitys of the world.

There is evidence of a shift in public opinion, mostly generational: a Pew poll this month showed falling support for Israel among younger Americans. Over 65s backed the Jewish state by 60% to just 9% support for the Palestinians. Among young adults, aged 18-29, just 44% were behind Israel with backing for the Palestinians rising to 22%.

As opinion shifts, it will be harder to go on presenting just one side of the story.

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith