Sunday, June 10, 2018
Is There Life After death? or Is It All a Myth?
Some of you have told me that life is all there is and when you’re dead you’re dead. You’ve said that it doesn’t really matter if there is life after death. You’re just going to live for the here and now and be good for goodness sake. I want to share something with you, some evidence to the contrary. I don’t know if you’re really interested in evidence. Your mind might already be made up and you don’t want to be bother with “more evidence.” After all you’ve come to your conclusions and this God stuff has only gotten us war after war. Look at the Middle East with the Muslims, Jews, and Christians. And, how can you know the truth? Look at all the different Christian denominations and sects there are. It’s just too much even to bother.
Besides, Dennis, you Christians are really homophobic. I read one of your articles about same-sex relations. You need to bring your ranching up to date. Pope Francisco is more in tune with the 21st century than you are. You’ve been reading that Bible too much. You actually think it’s true. Come on, Dennis, take your blinders off. Relax, people have been warning about the “end of the world” for I don’t know how long, and we’re still hear. We’ve muddle through this far and we’ll keep muddling through. Calm down, take a vacation, watch some television and put that old book made for monks in the monastery away and enjoy the last years of your life. If there’s life after death we’ll find out when we die. Stop worrying about it now. Just be good for goodness sake, like us. That’s all you need. That’s all the religion any of us need. So don’t try to convince us otherwise.
I am sorry you feel like that and have had such a bad experience with religion some place in your life. However, to be truthful with you, I had a pretty similar experience with religion which left me an atheist. But when I saw the arbitrariness of my atheistic faith, when I saw I couldn’t be a consistent atheist, I abandomed atheism for ignosticism. But the fact that love existed, and nature proclaimed the existence of something more, plus the perfect harmony of the stars and planets pushed me further along into Deism. It just seemed more logical that some kind of force or power or energy was in some way in control of the universe. Maybe it just got things started, but life and living things, and sunsets, and mountains, and beautiful people just seemed to cry out that there was some sort of creator or alien race out there somewhere that made us.
I just wanted to share with you some experiences I have had or have been told to me by others, experiences that give us some glimpses into the “other side,” or other dimension. I know you’re not ready for it and don’t want to hear it. But for those of you that do, here goes.
The first experiences comes from close friend of mine who I work with regularly. She’s a woman of great faith and worked in Brazil with a Christian organization that helped the poor people in the favelas to improve their living conditions. However, her greatest pleasue was not just transforming the favela physically, but helping to transform the lives of those who lived within the favela with the love of God and the truth of His word. She not only helped transform their lives, but also the lives of those who became partners with her in her humanitarian work: business owners, teachers, pyschologists, lawyers and other volunteers. Here’s one of her stories which just took place recently in Portugal.
Maria, my friend, was asked by a young woman she had met and talked to about Jesus, if she would go and visit her Aunti who was dying of cancer in a local hospital. My friend agreed to go with her one day soon for a visit. The day came and they arrived at the hospital, but only two people were allowed in the room with the patient at a time. Finally, it was their turn to go in and visit the dying woman. The friend who had invited Maria, chose to stay in the hallway and asked Maria to go in alone. Maria entered and went to the side of the woman’s bed. Maria could actually see how the cancer was destroying the woman’s insides as the nurses were doing some changing and the sheet was up.
Maria asked the woman if she believed in God. The woman responed that she did. Maria asked her if she was sure she was going to heaven when she died? The woman said she thought she was but she wasn't sure. Maria explained to the woman about asking Jesus into her heart to forgive her of her sins and to give her the free gift of eternal life, if she believed. The woman said that she indeed believed and wanted to say the prayer with Maria to receive Jesus. After they prayed, Maria asked the woman if she was at peace. The woman responded that she was, that she was at peace. She asked Maria to help her husband as it would be difficult for him to lose her as he was very dependent on her spiritually.
At that point, the woman told the nurse who was standing near by, she said, “I won’t be needing this mask anymore.” (She had been using a mask for breathing) "My angels are coming for me. I can see them. They are coming for me." Maria said that though the cancer was eating up the woman’s internal organs it hadn’t affected her mind and she was very lucid in her thinking, and even happy and bubbling, though she was dying. At that point, Maria gave the woman a kiss and said goodbye. Her husband was then able to return to the room and the woman and her husband had a few more minutes together and then she died. Maria was standing out in the hall with her friend when it happened. The woman had indeed seen her angels. Watch this scene from the movie Ghost giving us a glimpse at this event.
How can we explain that? Illusion? Imagination? Maybe the food or medicine she was taking caused her to see things? If there is no spiritual dimension and death is the end to everything why did she see her angels? Was it wishful thinking so that she would accept death peacefully. Had evolution developed the mind so well that it could conjure up visions to placate the soul in times of distress? I don’t think so. I’m more inclined to believe that the woman did see her angels coming for her. The whole event reminds me of the old song, “Swing Low Sweet Chariot,” song by the colored people during their times of affliction. Here it is sung by Johnny Cash.
Here’s a similar account from my own history. I had been visiting a friend of ours called Mimi. She owned a restaurante in town and came down with cancer. I think it was stomach cancer. During her time of treatment I would go and visit her at her home and sing Christian songs and read the Bible with her. She was a dear old woman of faith, generous, and loving. She had five children. Funny enough her husband was about twenty years older than me, but we had the same day of year for our birthday. While she was about twenty years older than my wife and their days of birth were just two days apart. She was born on March 9th, and my wife on March 11th. So we had this close bound with her and her husband, a sweet couple who came from Angola in 1975 when the revolution took place there.
Anyway, as things turned out, Mimi took a turn for the worse and her organs started to fail. The doctors told the children who were about ten to fifteen years my younger. Mimi went home from the hospital for a weekend and was going to go back to the hospital on Monday morning. Her oldest son called us to let us know to come and visit her on Sunday, as she was dying and it would be our last chance to see her. But he asked me to please not tell their Mom she was dying. That’s what they thought was best to do. That really annoyed me as I felt that if I was dying I would want to know about it and not be told a lie. With regrets even now when writing this, I conformed to their wishes, though now I wish I had done otherwise. But peer pressure is a powerful tool to silence us from speaking the truth to one another.
So, my wife an I got ready and drove over to Mimi’s new apartment they had recently bought. We rang the bell and waited for someone to open the door. Lo and behold, it was Mimi herself. She smiled, with that sweet loving smile of hers. Then she said, “Do you know what? I can see your angels. You have two shining angels standing right beside you.” She went on, “It’s funny, some of the others that have entered have angels also.” See this short clip on seeing angels.
We knew God himself was preparing Mimi for her soon departure by giving her a glimpse of the spiritual dimension. Even though our lips were sealed, God would not be mocked and He Himself was revealing the spiritual realities to His beloved daughter. She died the next day in the hospital. I was able to be with the family almost to the time of her death. But the nurses came in and saw so many people, Mimi’s five children and myself and a young portuguese adult who spoke English whom I brought with me to help in communicating to the family and she monitored me and my friend out. Family only, she commanded.
It’s really a shame that we are so afraid of death that we hardly want to talk about it. It used to be a natural thing that people did at home with there loved ones standing there besides them. The famous Christian Evangelist Dwight L. Moody died with his family all around him. He had been going in and out of consciousness throughout the day. The doctors had told the family that Moody was coming to his end, so they were all respectfully there at his side. But something unusal happened just before he died. There he had been almost the whole day sleeping or unconsciousness, yet just before death he awoke and said excitedly to his family, “I’ve been there. I’ve been inside the gates. It’s beautiful. More than you can image.” His oldest son replied, "Dad, you’ve been dreaming." Moody responed, “Son, it was more real than any dream.” With that he fell back into unconsciousness and died shortly afterwards.
My own father told me that he didn’t want to be recusitated when he died. He had been there to see the proceedure used on my grandfather whom the doctors brought back to life. My grandfather did not gain consciousness afterwards and laid for two more weeks in bed sleeping. My father was there when he died. Suddenly grandfather, who hadn’t shown any signs of life during that two week period, sat up with his eyes wide open as if he saw something entering the room. Just as quickly as he sat up, he laid back down and died. My father said he was sure that grandfather had seen the angels coming into the room for him.
My mother also shared one of her death experiences with us when we were children. I can vaguely remember the event. I was a small child when it happened. My mom’s God-father was sick. He lived out on Long Island while we lived in Central Jersey about an hour and a half apart. On the night of her God-father’s death she dreamed he came and said good-bye to her. The next morning, her auntie, her God-father’s wife, called her informing her that her God-father had died the night before. How do you naturalists explain that? Did they have such a strong emotional connection that her God-father could communicate with her over a hundred miles?
At the time of my 27 years old son’s death, I , too, had a spiritual experience. I had put down the phone from the call from my son’s roommate in the Bermudas who had informed me that my son had gone missing and that they had found his clothes on the beach side. I fell to my knees in prayer. “Oh, God, oh God, why?” “Please be with him, help him.” In that moment, suddenly, I saw in my mind's eye a vision of my son entering into the gates of heaven. It was more like he was getting off a boat and going up a ramp into a crowd of people. I could see my father embracing him. A friend who had just recently died of brain cancer, was also there to well-come him. There was a throng of people celebrating my son’s arrival. That was the end of the vision.
From that point on, I knew he would not be found alive. Five days later his body washed ashore and was found by some German tourists walking along the beach some 21 miles from where his clothes had been found. It was really a miracle for the police told me some other foreigners had also gone missing in the water never to be seen again. I thanked God that I was able to mourn knowing without a shadow of doubt that my son had gone home to his reward.
But that was not the only spiritual or super-natural event that took place at my son’s death. The next one happened when I was in the Bermudas cleaning up my son’s things. I was getting his clothes ready to give away to the local Red Cross and tying up his loose ends. But grief would overcome me like tidal waves. I was in his room, cleaning up his remaining things, and I couldn’t go on any longer. The pain was just too much to bear. I was crying uncontrollably. I stopped working and went to my lap top to check my mail. Maybe there was something there that would help me.
And there it was. A former girlfriend of my son had written me an e-mail. She said, “Dennis, I wanted to tell you that this morning I had a dream with your son, Martin. He told me to tell you that everything is alright. Not to worry about him. He said now he understands everything you tried to teach him.” End of message I just broke done and bawled even more, and yet my tears changed from mourning into rejoicing. Martin was home, safe in the arms of Jesus, my beloved Friend and Savior.
There you go, dear friends. I hope these testimonies have helped you have faith that there is more to life than meets the eye. Jesus said that unless a man be borned again he could not see the kingdom of God. Maybe you are not seeing these things because you haven’t been born again by God’s spirit into the new life. Maybe you haven’t been hungering and thirsting for righteousness and have just accepted the weary meaningless world that we have. But it doesn’t have to be so, my friend. Call out to God in honest desperation and He promises to answer you and reveal Himself to you.
You could pray a simple prayer like this one, or something similar from your heart. “Dear Jesus or God or whoever you are, reveal yourself to me. I don’t want to be in darkness. I don’t want to be deceived. Like Neo in the Matrix movie, I want the truth. Reveal the truth to me. Is Jesus really the son of God like Dennis claims? Is all this true that he has shared with me? Help me God, or Jesus, if you are there. I’m tired of doing things my way. I’ve done it my way for too long. If You have a better way show me. My head has been bloodied and unbowed, but now I bow my head and ask that You really reveal Yourself to me. Help me. I need your help. I pray this, in Jesus’ name. Amen."
If you pray a prayer like that one, God has promised to reveal Himself to you if you are seeking Him in sincerity. You’ve got to make an effort and not let compromises keep you from the truth. If you need any help, please feel free to write me on messenger or whatsup, or at my google address: dennismedwards@gmail.com I love you and am praying for you that you’ll make the right decision and stand up and be counted for God. Love, Dennis The following video from the Billy Graham ministry might be helpful.
Thursday, June 7, 2018
Matthew Fontaine Maury: "Pathfinder Of Sea" Psalms 8
Maury Tombstone located at Hollywood Cemetery in Richmond. Can someone send me the inscription text? Bibliography: A Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin, 1888 The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930 M.F. Maury, Physical Geography of the Sea and its Meteorology, 21 edition, 1888 AD Matthew Fontaine Maury, Trail maker of the seas, Hildegarde Hawthorn, 1943 Matthew Fontaine Maury, Scientist of the Sea, Frances Leigh Williams, 1963 Doretha Vaughan, 550 E. Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23219; 804-782-2777 The Fontaine/Maury Society Library; Fred Fontaine, Librarian 10 Broadway Street, Montgomery, AL 36110 Phone: 334-263-5325 Additional resources:
Lewis, Charles Lee (1927), Matthew Fontaine Maury: The Pathfinder of the Seas (Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Institute, 1969 reprint by AMS Press, New York).
Major, T. (1995), "Honor to Whom Honor...Matthew Fontaine Maury (1806-1873)," Creation Research Society Quarterly, 32:82-87.
Documentation section:
"With the light which these discoveries met, we ... (Plate 1.) why air, which has completed it. circuit to the whirl* about the Antarctic regions, should then, according to the laws of magnetism, be repelled from the south, and attracted by the opposite pole toward the north. Footnote: * 'It whirleth about continually.' - Bible" (M.F. Maury, Physical Geography of the Sea and its Meteorology, 1888 AD, p 121, section 225)
It has been reserved for one of our own countrymen to discover the paths of the sea; to map the tracks of the winds; to shorten sailing time to California thirty days, to Australia twenty, and to Rio Janeiro ten. He has communed with the spirit of the sea earnestly and lovingly; and while it shouted to others in thunder peals of omnipotence, and majesty, and eternity, it came and whispered to him in gentle and soothing tones of divine beneficence, wisdom, love. The American Franklin drew the lightning from heaven; the American Morse sent it as an errand-boy along the oscillating wire; and now again American genius stands confessed in high superiority, as Maury tells us "whence the wind cometh and whither it goeth," and then declares that long, long ago the Bible announced the same teachings. He has shown us that the most exquisite proofs of perfect design and infinite skill are manifested in ocean laws. Take the Gulf Stream. Here we have a river in the sea, "which in the severest drouths never fails, in the mightiest floods never overflows; with banks and bottom of cold water, while the current is of warm." It flows ceaselessly from the Gulf of Mexico to the Arctic Seas. It has a current more rapid than the Mississippi or Amazon. Some of our American writers supposed this stream was caused by the Mississippi river, which had accumulated so much western American force of character, that, entering the ocean through the Gulf, it pushed boldly on, holding tenaciously together on the ground that "the union must be preserved, and refusing to submit to any interference from Neptune till it paid its homage to Terminus in the Arctic Sea, and, in a quiet, respectable, and eminently American (The Sea by , Eddy, Rev. T. M., A. M.: pp 460, The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion./ vol. 15, iss. 8 Publication Date: Aug 1855)
Dr. Franklin was the first to suggest that the Gulf Stream clearly defined the longitude of vessels, and notified them of their approach to the shores of this continent. Its waters are separated from the common sea-water by a sharp dividing line. In making our northern coast in winter the sailor encountered furious snow-storms and "gusty gales," which baffled his skill and drove back his vessel, while the intense cold covered it with a mass of ice. The only refuge was to hold her away for the Gulf Stream. When reached, the weary ship passed at once, as from the frigid zone, to the balmy air of the tropics. "The ice disappears; the sailor bathes his limbs in tepid water; feeling himself refreshed and invigorated with the genial warmth about him, he realizes the fable of Antsaus and his mother Earth." These storm-conflicts were protracted and severe. Vessels bound to Norfolk or Baltimore have encountered them as far down as the capes of Virginia, and have been repeatedly driven back into the Gulf Stream, and have kept out forty, fifty, and even sixty days in vain attempts to make the anchorage. Hence, ship captains naturally enough sought to secure more southerly markets, and took their commerce to the ports of the Carolinas. "Before the temperature of the stream was known, vessels beat back as above described had no refuge short of the West Indies." Dr. Franklin's discovery of its temperature, and its importance in determining longitude-by the thermometer-and ascertaining the locality of the ship, was made in 1775, but, in consequence of the war with the mother-country, was not made public till 1790. When made known it demonstrated that in approaching this country the warm water of the Stream and the cold water on the sides forming its banks, if tried by the thermometer, would ascertain approximately his position. An old navigator, writing to the Doctor, said that if the Gulf Stream had been of green and the banks of yellow, they could not more certainly mark the sailor's path than they did by the use of the thermometer. (The Sea by , Eddy, Rev. T. M., A. M.: p 461, The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion./ vol. 15, iss. 8 Publication Date: Aug 1855)
When our own Franklin flew his kite in the storm, who would have thought that the inkling which he then caught as to a law of nature would enable us to turn aside the artillery of heaven? Or when, at another time, he dipped his thermometer into the sea, how could the most keen sighted utilitarian have perceived that the fact thus Stream, is matter of conjecture. Before their temperature was known, vessels thus distressed, knew of no place of refuge short of the West Indies; and the newspapers of that day,-Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette among them,-inform us that it was no uncommon occurrence for vessels, bound for the Capes of the Delaware in winter, to be blown off and to go to the West Indies, and there wait for the return of spring before they would attempt another approach to this part of the coast. Accordingly, Dr. Franklin's discovery of the Gulf Stream temperature was looked upon as one of great importance, not only on account of its affording to the frosted mariner in winter a convenient refuge from the snow storm, but because of its serving the Navigator with an excellent land mark or beacon for our coast in all weathers. And so viewing it, the Doctor concealed the discovery, for we were then at war with England. (Paper on the Gulf Stream and Currents of the Sea, MF Maury p. 395)
Matthew Fontaine Maury achieved considerable respect in the middle of the nineteenth century for founding the science of oceanography. His mappping of the world's major ocean and wind currents for the benefit of sailing ships earned him the title "pathfinder of the Seas." Other fields, such as meteorology, navigation, and ordnance, also profited from his methodical and inventive mind. Although largely forgotten outside his native Virginia, Maury endures in Bible-science literature as a credible scientist who took a literal view of Scripture. According to one common story, Maury's reading about the "paths of the sea" in Psalm 8:8 led him to discover ocean currents. Although various aspects of this legend fail historical scrutiny, Maury held strongly to the view that the Bible and science were in perfect harmony. For modern creationists, he represents a successful scientist who eschewed the modernistic trend to divide secular and biblical knowledge. (Trevor J. Major, M.Sc., 1995, "Honor to Whom Honor...Matthew Fontaine Maury (1806-1873)," Creation Research Society Quarterly, 32:82-87)
"On a monument erected by the state of Virginia to his memory is found a plaque that reads as follows: "Matthew Fontaine Maury, Pathfinder of the Seas, the genius who first snatched from the oceans and atmosphere the secret of their laws. His inspiration, Holy Writ, Psalm 8:8; Ecclesiastes 1:6." A genius? No. Just a simple Bible-believing Christian who trusted the inerrancy of the Word of God. (Duane Gish, Days of Praise; Daily Bible Readings and Devotional Commentaries, January 2000)
I found the monument [Ann Lamont incorrectly calls it a tombstone in her book] information here: Matthew Maury (1806-1873), On his tombstone [wrong: it is th monument, not the tombstone] at the U.S. Naval Academy is inscribed the eighth Psalm, verse eight: which says in part ". . . whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas." He believed that if God said there were paths in the seas, it should be possible to find them. He dedicated his life to doing just that, and find them he did. (Ann Lamont, 21 Great Scientists who Believed the Bible, Creation Science Foundation, Australia, 1995, pp. 120-131.)
Did Maury discover Ocean currents?
See this link: God's inspired message to man. Scientific evidences to prove it!!!
Did Maury himself know about ocean currents before his word began? Bible haters suggest that the ocean currents were quite well known and make it sound like Maury hardly discovered anything regarding the paths in the sea. The issue is not if some others knew about a single ocean current like the gulf stream, but if Maury had this information available to him.
"The first chart of the Gulf Stream was prepared about 1769 under the direction of Benjamin Franklin while he was Deputy Postmaster General of the Colonies. The Board of Customs in Boston had complained that the mail packets coming from England took two weeks longer to make the westward crossing than did the Rhode Island merchant ships. Franklin, perplexed, took the problem to a Nantucket sea captain, Timothy Folger, who told him this might very well be true because the Rhode Island captains were well acquainted with the Gulf Stream and avoided it on the westward crossing, whereas the English captains were not. Folger and other Nantucket whalers were personally familiar with the Stream because, he explained: 'in our pursuit of whales, which keep to the sides of it but are not met within it, we run along the side and frequently cross it to change our side, and in crossing it have sometimes met and spoke with those packets who were in the middle of it and stemming it. We have informed them that they were stemming a current that was against them to the value of three miles an hour and advised them to cross it, but they were too wise to be counseled by simple American fishermen'." (The Sea Around Us, Rachel Carson, p. 127)
Before leaving New York [In 1831] he had searched in every direction for reliable information as to the winds and currents to be encountered, and the best path for his vessel to follow. He soon found that little was known on the subject. (A Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin, 1888 AD p21-23)
By 1853 Maury had won distinction in many fields. His deeds suggested various titles of honor, but the one of chief renown and the one by which he is still most widely known is "Pathfinder of the Seas." The waters, the whales, and even the winds have paths over or through the seas; tracing these, Maury found also the best paths for ships. On the land a river now and then cuts a new channel. At first we might suppose that a river in the sea will do so more frequently, but this is probably not the case. The banks of water seem to hold a current in its channel as well as banks of clay and stone. Maury's description of ocean currents is interesting. He says: "There are rivers in the sea. They are of such magnitude that the mightiest streams of the land are rivulets compared to them. They are either of warm or cold water, while their banks and beds are water of the opposite temperature. For thousands of miles they move through their liquid channels unmixed with the confining waters. They are the horizontal movements called currents. "The mariner can sometimes detect them by the different color of their stream, while, if they give no such visible sign of their existence, he can trace them by testing their temperature with his thermometer. "There is an equatorial current sweeping from east to west all along on either side of the equator, and well nigh encircling the globe. There are polar currents setting from the polar regions toward the equator; and there are return currents setting from the equator toward the poles." (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930, p81)
"About the year 1846, when Maury was beginning to chart the seas, there were nearly a thousand vessels of various countries engaged in whaling ..." (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930, p82)
Even the roving winds may be tracked and charted. "The direction in which a wind blows, says Maury, "is so constantly changing that we often speak of the winds as fickle, inconstant, and uncertain. There is, however, order in the movements of the atmosphere. The fickle winds are obedient to laws. "Certain of the winds blow without interruption in the same direction, and at nearly the same rate. So constant are they that vessels often sail in them for days and days without, as the sailors say, 'changing a stitch of canvas.' It was the steady blowing of these winds which so alarmed the crew of Columbus on his first voyage to America, and led them to fear that they should never get back to Europe. From their always pursuing one trade (path), or from their importance to navigators, these winds have been called the trade winds or trades. They are currents of air which are ceaselessly winging their flight from the polar and temperate regions toward the equator." (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930, p83)
On his way down to Rio in the Falmouth, in 1831, Maury first saw the need of wind and current charts, and perhaps made up his mind to make such charts if he ever had a chance. Sixteen years later, after years more on the ocean and years of work at Washington, he published his first wind and current chart of the North Atlantic. Sending this out in large numbers, he soon began to receive in return the records of the thousand captains and more who used it. Every ship that used his chart and answered his questions became a "floating observatory, a temple of science." (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930, p84)
In light of the new facts thus collected he revised his chart of the North Atlantic; and as time passed he made other charts-of the South Atlantic, the North Pacific, the South Pacific, and the Indian Ocean. In 1851 President Fillmore stated in his annual message that by means of Maury's wind and current charts the passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific ports of our country had been shortened by about forty days. In 1854 the Secretary of the Navy asserted that Maury's work had promoted commerce by pointing out to the mariner new paths in the great deep where favorable winds and currents lent aid; that his charts and sailing directions, by shortening the voyages of merchant vessels, were saving millions of dollars. The "Pathfinder" was laying thousands under tribute, but he was making the world his debtor. Before Maury charted the best paths from the Atlantic to the Pacific, it usually took a ship about 180 days to sail from New York to San Francisco, fifteen thousand miles, around Cape Horn; but by the year 1855, after his charts had been in use for seven or eight years, the average time had been reduced to about 133 days. In 1851, as we have seen, the Flying Cloud made the run in slightly less than ninety days. The same year there was a famous race between the Sea Witch, the Typhoon, and the Raven. The Raven won, making the long voyage in 105 days. The year before she had made the same voyage in 97 days.
Another long voyage for the sailing ships of those days was the trip from England to Australia and New Zealand. They went down by the coasts of Spain and Portugal and the long shores of Africa, turned eastward close around the Cape of Good Hope, and then crossed the wide Indian Ocean. Homeward bound, they came back over the same route, often fighting against adverse winds. It took them about one hundred and twenty days each way. Maury proposed a new route for them. Following his directions, they made a wide circle around the Cape of Good Hope going eastward, and then instead of turning back for the homeward voyage they continued eastward ' the winds strong behind them, circled the globe, and came up into the Atlantic around Cape Horn. By this new route they saved about forty-eight days on the round trip.
It is estimated that following the paths mapped out by Maury saved the merchants and ship owners of the United States over two million dollars a year, and those of Great Britain about ten millions each year. In 1853 a number of merchants and other business men of New York presented him with several fine pieces of silverware and a purse of $5,000. In 1854 Columbia University made him a Doctor of Laws. The next year a New York firm named one of their fast ships in his honor; and a few years later he received a letter of appreciation signed by 363 men in different parts of the country. In 1855 a bill was offered in Congress proposing to give him $25,000 from public funds, but this was not passed. (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930, p85)
When Did Maury's daughter say he first conceived the idea of paths of the sea?
During a time at sea, after having searched in vain for ocean current charts, when he was intensely studying the Bible. Maury likely first connected the Bible verse of Ps 8 here before he was married (2 years later) and over the next 10 years continued his research. This does not prove the story about being in a sick bed and having his son read to him Ps 8 untrue, only that it may have provided a second reminder of something he had already conceived. In any case, it is clear that the Bible was the inspiration for his work.
"In 1831 Maury was appointed master of the sloop-of-war 'Falmouth,' which had been ordered to the Pacific Station. ... His was eminently an original mind, and he delighted to spend hours in meditation, working out his own great ideas. But he had the Bible and Shakespeare at his fingers' ends, and his many writings abound in quotations from both. It was during this voyage in the 'Falmouth' to Rio de Janeiro, on his way to the Pacific, that he conceived the idea of the celebrated Wind and Current Charts, which have since accomplished so much for the commerce of the world." (A Life of Matthew Fontain Maury, Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin, 1888 AD p21-23)
TRUE OR FALSE? The Maury story: "He took God at His word and believed Ps 8 "Paths of the sea" and used it as a motivation to discover the ocean currents.
See this link: God's inspired message to man. Scientific evidences to prove it!!!
Matthew Fontaine Maury, Pathfinder of the Seas, by C.L. Lewis. 1927 by the U. S. Naval Institute, RECOUNTS THE ENTIRE STORY. Mr. Maury "took God at His word" and found that word to be accurate.
Maury's Monument: At "Goshen Pass" a granite shaft to Maury, was erected in 1923 by the State of Virginia with this inscription: "Matthew Fontaine Maury Pathfinder Of The Seas The Genius Who First Snatched From The Ocean And Atmosphere The Secret Of Their Laws. [stuff deleted] HIS INSPIRATION HOLY WRIT Psalms 8 and 107, Verses 8, 23 and 24 Ecclesiastes Chap. 1, Verse 8 A Tribute By His Native State Virginia. 1923" (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930)
Maury was a Bible fundamentalist who used the Bible to prove that the Bible contains factual scientific statements very similar to the way we would today. Read the five different sections below that document this fact:
Science and the Bible! Maury believed the Bible was inspired by God and contained scientific truths revealed before man discovered it for himself! For the Bible he entertained the highest veneration, and its testimony, to his mind, was ever strengthened by the progress of scientific discovery.(A Life of Matthew Fontain Maury, Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin, 1888 AD p287)
You ask about the "harmony of science and revelation," and wish to know if I find distinct traces in the Old Testament of scientific knowledge, and in the Bible any knowledge of the winds and ocean currents. Yes, knowledge the most correct and reliable. ("A Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury" by Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin. 1888 AD, p158)
Astronomy ignores the existence of man, physical geography confesses that existence, and is based on the, Biblical doctrine 'that the earth was made for man.' 'Upon no other theory can it be studied-upon no other theory can its phenomena be reconciled. ... I have been blamed by men of science, both in this country and in England, for quoting the Bible in confirmation of the doctrines of physical geography. The Bible, they say, was not written for scientific purposes, and is therefore, of no authority in matters of science. I beg pardon! The Bible is authority for everything it touches. What would you think of the historian who should refuse to consult the historical records of the Bible, because the Bible was not written for the purposes of history ? The Bible is true and science is true and therefore each, the truth of the other if truly read, but proves the truth of the other. The agents in the physical economy of our planet are ministers of Him who made both it and the Bible. The records which He has chosen to make through the agency of these ministers of His upon the crust of the earth are as true as the records which, by the hands of His prophets and servants, He has been pleased to make in the Book of Life. ("A Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury" by Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin. 1888 AD, p175)
"As our knowledge of the laws of nature has increased, so have our readings of the Bible improved.- The Bible frequently makes allusion to the laws of nature, their operation and effects. ... And as for the general system of atmospherical circulation which I have been so long endeavoring to describe, the Bible tells it all in a single sentence: The wind goeth towards the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits."" - Ecclesiastes 1:6 (M.F. Maury, Physical Geography of the Sea and its Meteorology, 1888 AD, 21 edition, p82, section 216)
For the Bible lie entertained the highest veneration, and its testimony, to his mind, was ever strengthened by the progress of scientific discovery. (A Life of Matthew Fontain Maury, Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin, 1888 AD p287)
"M. F. Maury believed that God was profoundly interested in man, had made the earth for man, and was more eager to reveal than to withhold the secrets of nature for man's benefit. MFM never turned aside from the convictions he expressed in 1834 to his brother, "Learn your duties, Dick, from the Bible. There you have them laid down in example, law, and precept. I love to see Christians after the Bible and according to their own consciences, and not according to the opinions of other men."" MFM to Richard L. Maury, Tennessee, Nov. 16, 1834, MP, Vol. 1, LC. (Matthew Fontaine Maury, Scientist of the Sea, Frances Leigh Williams, 1963, p 341, footnote 82 on page 592)
A book or a chart in the hand in Richmond monument???
1. The Encyclopedia Britannica (on Line edition) refers to this website for more information about the Maury statue that says Maury is holding a book. "In this sculpture, Maury is seated in an armchair holding a book. Behind him stands a large base on which rests a globe of the world and relief figures moving about it. The vertical axis established by Maury in the armchair and the globe hovering above is balanced by the horizontal axis of Maury's elbows splayed outward on the armrests of the chair. Sievers has rendered Maury sitting in a contemplative mood, his head is tilted downward as if the weight of this world bears upon him.
2. "In his right hand are the pencil and compass, and his left hand a chart." (Matthew Fontaine Maury, Pathfinder of the Seas, by C.L. Lewis. 1927 by the U. S. Naval Institute)
3. This book has a good black and white photo of the monument in Richmond. Although not definitive, it appears to be a chart because of the curly shape of it. (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930)
This photo settles the issue: Maury's article: The Bible And Science, Jan. 22, 1855
From the Southern Churchman : -
1etter, by M. F. MAURY.
THE BIBLE AND SCIENCE.
Observatory, Washington, Jan. 22, 1855.
Your letter revived pleasant remembrances. Your questions are themes. It would require volumes to contain the answers to them.
You ask about the "harmony of science and revelation," and wish to know if I find distinct traces in the Old Testament of scientific knowledge, and in the Bible any knowledge of the winds and ocean currents. Yes, knowledge the most correct and reliable.
Canst thou bind the sweet influences of the Pleiades ? It is a curious fact, that the revelations of science have led astronomers of our own day to the discovery, that the sun is not the dead centre of motion around which comets sweep and planets whirl, but that it, with its splendid retinue of worlds and satellites, is revolving through space at the rate of millions of miles in a year, and in obedience to some influence situated precisely in the, direction of the star Alcyon, one of the Pleiades. We do not know how far off in the immensities of space that centre of revolving cycles and epicycles may be, nor have our oldest observers or nicest instruments been able to tell us how far off in the, skies that beautiful cluster of stars is hung "whose influences man can never bind." In this question alone, and the answer to it, are involved both the recognition and the exposition of the whole theory of gravitation.
Science taught that the world was round; but potentates pronounced the belief heretical, notwithstanding the Psalmist, while apostrophizing the works of creation in one of his sublime moods of inspiration, " when prophets spake as they were moved," had called the world " the round world," and bade it rejoice."
You remember when Galileo was in prison a pump-maker came to him with his difficulties, because his pump would not lift water higher than thirty-two feet. The old philosopher thought it was because the atmosphere would not press the water up any higher; but the hand of persecution was upon him, and he was afraid to say the air had lie weight. Now had he looked to the science of the Bible would have discovered that the " perfect man of Uz," moved by inspiration, had proclaimed the fact thousands of years before-" He maketh weight for the wind." Job is very learned, and his speeches abound iii scientific lore. The persecutors of the old astronomers would also have been wiser and far more just had they paid more attention to this wonderful book, for there they would have learned that He "stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing."
Here is another proof that Job was familiar with the laws of gravitation, for lie knew how the world was held in its place ; and as for " the empty place " in the sky, Sir John Herschel has been sounding, the heavens with his powerful telescope, and gauging the stars ; and where do you think lie found the most barren part--" the empty places " of the sky ? In the north, precisely where Job told Bildad, the Shuhite, empty place was stretched out. It is there where comets most delight to roam and hide themselves in emptiness.
I pass by the history of creation as it is written on the tablets of the rocks and in the Book of Revelation, because the question has been discussed so much and so often, that you, no doubt, are familiar with the whole subject. In both the order of creation is the same. First, the plants to afford subsistence, and then the animals, the chief point of apparent difference being as to the duration of the period between "the evening and the morning." "A thousand years are in His sight as one day," and the Mosaic account affords evidence itself that the term "day," as there used, is not that which comprehends our twenty-four hours. It was a day that had its " evening and morning " before the sun was made.
I will, however, before proceeding further, ask pardon for mentioning a rule of conduct which I have adopted in order to make progress with these physical researches, which have occupied so much of my time and so many of my thoughts. The rule is, never to forget who is the Author of the great volume which Nature spreads out before us, and always to remember that the same Being is the Author of the book which revelation holds up to us, and though the two works are entirely different, their records are equally true, and when they bear upon the same point, as now and then they do, it is as impossible that they should contradict each other as it is that either should contradict itself. If the two cannot be reconciled, the fault is ours, and is because, in our blindness and weakness, we have not been able to interpret aright either the one or the other, or both.
Solomon, in a single verse, describes the circulation of the atmosphere as actual observation is now showing it to be. That it has its laws, and is obedient to order as the heavenly host in their movements, we infer from the facts announced by him, and which contain the essence of volumes by other men. " All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full; " " Into the place from whence, the rivers come, thither they return again."
To investigate the laws which govern the winds and rule the sea is one of the most profitable and beautiful occupations that a man -an improving, progressive man- can have. Pecked with stars as the sky is, the field of astronomy affords no subjects of contemplation more ennobling, more sublime, or more profitable than those which we may find in the air and the sea. When we regard these from certain points of view, they present the appearance of wayward things obedient to no law, but fickle in their movements and subject only to chance.
Yet, when we go as truth-loving, knowledge -seeking explorers, and knock at their secret chambers and devoutly ask what are the laws which govern them, we are taught, in terms the most impressive, that " when the morning stars sang together the waves also lifted up their voice," and the winds too, joined in the mighty anthem."
And as the discovery advances, we find the mark of order in the sea and in the air that is in tune with the "music of the spheres," and the conviction is forced upon us that the laws of all are nothing else but perfect harmony.
Yours respectfully,
M. F. MAURY, Lieut. U.S. Navy
("A Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury" by Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin. 1888 AD, p158)
Maury's Public Address: Nov. 30th, 1860
Nov. 30th, 1860
Maury's address at the laying of the corner-stone of the University of the South, on the Sewanee Mountains in East Tennessee, was delivered at the request of Bishop Otey on Nov. 30th, 1860.
"Physical geography," he said, "makes the whole world kin. Of all the departments in the domains of physical science, it is the most Christianising. Astronomy is grand and sublime; but astronomy overpowers with its infinities, overwhelms with its immensities. Physical geography charms with its wonders, and delights with the benignity of its economy. Astronomy ignores the existence of man physical geography confesses that existence, and is based on the, Biblical doctrine 'that the earth was made for man.' 'Upon no other theory can it be studied-upon no other theory can its phenomena be reconciled. . . .
The astronomer regards the light and heat of the sun as emanations; -is forces to guide the planets in their orbits and light comets in their flight - nothing more. But the physical geographer, when he warms himself by the coal fire in winter, or studies by the light of the gas-burner at night, recognizes in the light and heat which lie then enjoys the identical light and heat which came from the sun ages ago, and which, with provident care, have been bottled away in the shape of a mineral, and stored away in the bowels of the earth for man's use, thence to be taken at his convenience and liberated at will for his manifold purposes.
" Here, in the schools which are soon to be opened, within the walls of this institution which we are preparing to establish in this wood, and the corner-stone of which has just been laid, the masters of this newly-ordained science will teach our sons to regard some of the commonest things as the most important agents in the physical economy of our planet. They are also mighty ministers of the Creator.
Take this water " (holding up a glassful) " and ask the student of physical geography to explain a portion only of its multitudinous offices in helping to make the, earth fit for man's habitation. There may be in it a drop of the very same (for in the economy of nature nothing is ever lost or wasted) which watered the Garden of Eden when Adam was there; escaping thence, through the veins of the earth into the rivers, it reached the sea. Passing along its channels of circulation, it was conveyed far away by its currents to those springs in the ocean which feed the winds with vapour for rains among these mountains; taking up the, heat in these southern climes, where otherwise it would become excessive, it bottles it away in its own little vesicles. These are invisible; but, rendering the heat latent and innocuous, they pass like sightless couriers of the air through their appointed channels, and arrive in the upper sky. This mountain draws the heat from them; they are formed into clouds and condensed into rain, which, falling to the earth, make it soft with showers, causing the trees of the fields to clap their hands, the valleys to shout, and the mountains to sing.". Thus the earth is made to yield her increase, and the heart of man is glad.
Nor does the office of this cup of water in the physical economy end here. It has brought heat from the sea in the, southern hemisphere to be set free here for the regulation of our climates; it has ministered to the green plants, and given meat and drink to man and beast. It has now to cater among the rocks for the fish and insects of the sea. Eating away your mountains, it fills up the valleys, and then, loaded with lime and salts of various minerals, it goes singing and dancing and leaping back to the sea, owning man, by the way, as a task-master-turning mills driving machinery, transporting merchandise for him-and finally reaching, the ocean. It there joins the currents to be conveyed to its appointed place, which it never fails to reach in due time, with food ill due quantities for the inhabitants of the deep, and with materials of the right kind to be elaborated, in the workshops of the sea, into pearls, corals, and islands-all for man's use.
"Thus the right-minded student of this science is brought to recognize in the, dewdrop the materials of which 'He who walketh upon the wings of the wind maketh His chariot.' He also discovers in the raindrop a clue by which the Christian philosopher may be conducted into the very chambers from which the, hills are watered.
I have been blamed by men of science, both in this country and in England, for quoting the Bible in confirmation of the doctrines of physical geography. The Bible, they say, was not written for scientific purposes, and is therefore, of no authority in matters of science. I beg pardon! The Bible is authority for everything it touches. What would you think of the historian who should refuse to consult the historical records of the Bible, because the Bible was not written for the purposes of history ? The Bible is true and science is true and therefore each, the truth of the other if truly read, but proves the truth of the other. The agents in the physical economy of our planet are ministers of Him who made both it and the Bible. The records which He has chosen to make through the agency of these ministers of His upon the crust of the earth are as true as the records which, by the hands of His prophets and servants, He has been pleased to make in the Book of Life.
They are both true; and when your men of science, with vain and hasty conceit, announce the discovery of disagreement between them, rely upon it, the fault is not with the witness of His records, but with the worm who essays to interpret evidence which lie does not understand.
When I, a pioneer in one department of this beautiful science, discover the truths of Revelation and the truths of science reflecting light the one upon the other, how can I as a truth-loving knowledge-seeking man, fail to point out the beauty and rejoice in its discovery? Reticence on such an occasion would be sin, and were I to suppress the emotion with which such discoveries ought to stir the soul the 'waves of the sea would lift up their voice,' and the very stones of the earth cry out against me.
As a student of physical geography, I regard earth, sea, air, and water as parts of a machine, pieces of mechanism, not made with hands, but to which, nevertheless, certain offices have been assigned in the terrestrial economy ; and when, after patient research, I am led to the discovery of one of these offices, I feel, with the astronomer of old, 'as though I had thought one of God's thoughts, and tremble. Thus as we, progress with our science, we are permitted now and then to point out here and there the physical machinery of the earth a design of the Great Architect when He planned it all.
"Take the little Nautili. Where do the fragile creatures go? What directing hand guides them from sea to sea ? What breeze fills the violet sails of their tiny craft? And by whose skill is it enabled to brave the sea, and defy the fury of the gale? What mysterious compass directs the flotilla of the graceful Argonauts? Coming down from the Indian Ocean, and arriving off the stormy Cape, they separate, the one part steering for the Pacific, the other standing for the Atlantic Ocean. Soon the ephemeral life that animates these little Navigators will be extinct; but the same power that cared for them in life, now guides them after death; for though dead, their task in the physical economy of our planet is not yet finished, nor have they ceased to afford instruction in philosophy.
The frail shell is now to lie drawn to distant seas by the lower currents. Like the leaf carried through the air by the wind the lifeless remains descend from depth to depth by an insensible fall, even to the appointed burial-place, on the bottom of the deep, there to be collected into heaps, and gathered into beds -which at some day are to appear above the surface, a storehouse rich with fertilizing ingredients for man's use. Some day science will sound the depths to which this dead shell, has fallen, and the little creature will perhaps afford solution for a problem as yet -unsolved ; for it may be the means of revealing the existence of the submarine currents that have carried it off, and of enabling the physical geographer to trace out the secret paths of the sea.
"Had I time I might show how mountains, deserts, winds, and water, when treated by the light of this beautiful science, all join in one universal harmony, for each one has its part to perform in the great concert of nature. . . .
The Church, ere yet physical geography had attained to the dignity of a science in our schools, and even before man had endowed it with a name saw and appreciated its dignity, the virtue of its chief agents. What have we heard here in this grove by a thousand voices this morning ? A song of praise, such as these hills have not heard since the morning stars sang together the 'Benedicite' of our mother Church invoking the very agents whose workings and offices it is the business of the physical geographer to study and point out. In her services she teaches her children in their songs of praise to call upon certain physical agents, principals in this newly-established department of human knowledge; upon the waters above the, firmament, upon the showers, dew, wind, fire and heat winter and summer frost and cold ice and snow, night and day, light and darkness, lightning and clouds, mountains and hills, green things, tree and plants, whales and all things that move in the waters fowls of the air, with beasts and cattle, to bless, praise, and magnify the Lord!
("A Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury" by Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin. 1888 AD, p175)
"216. As our knowledge of the laws of nature has increased, so have our readings of the Bible improved.- The Bible frequently makes allusion to the laws of nature, their operation and effects. But such allusions are often so wrapped in the folds of the peculiar and graceful drapery with which its language is occasionally clothed that the meaning, though peeping out from its thin covering all the while, yet lies in some sense concealed, until the lights and revelations of science are thrown upon it; then it bursts out and strikes us with exquisite force and beauty. As our knowledge of Nature and her laws has increased, so has our understanding of many passages in the Bible been improved.
The Psalmist called the earth the round world;" yet for ages it was the most damnable heresy for Christian men to say the world is round; and, finally, sailors circumnavigated the globe, proved the Bible to be right, and saved Christian men of science from the stake. Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades Astronomers of the present day, if they have not answered this question, have thrown so much light upon it as to show that, if ever it, be answered by man, he must consult the science of astronomy. It has being recently all but proved, that the earth and sun, with their splendid retinue of comets, satellites, and planets, are all in motion around some, point or centre of attraction inconceivably remote, and that the point is in the direction of the star Alcyon, one or the Pleiades. Who but the astronomer, then, Could tell their " sweet influences?" And as for the general system of atmospherical circulation which I have been so long endeavoring to describe, the Bible tells it all in a single sentence: The wind goeth towards the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits."" - Ecclesiastes 1:6 (M.F. Maury, Physical Geography of the Sea and its Meteorology, 1888 AD, p82, section 216)
The early career of Fontaine:
In 1831 Maury was appointed master of the sloop-of-war 'Falmouth,' which had been ordered to the Pacific Station. ... In the 'Falmouth' Maury had a cabin to himself, and in addition to his own small store of books he had the use of a fine collection belong to a richer messmate (William Irving brother to the author of the 'Sketch-book'). But he was never a great reader. He was often heard to say that it was not until he had been put repeatedly to the blush because. of his ignorance of the standard literature of the day and had wondered at the evident delight afforded to some of his companions on reading or quoting a beautiful or striking passage, that he resolutely set himself to work to read the English classics, and to try to enjoy what gave so much pleasure to the most cultivated of his associates. His was eminently an original mind, and he delighted to spend hours in meditation, working out his own great ideas.
But he had the Bible and Shakespeare at his fingers' ends, and his many writings abound in quotations from both. It was during this voyage in the 'Falmouth' to Rio de Janeiro, on his way to the Pacific, that he conceived the idea of the celebrated Wind and Current Charts, which have since accomplished so much for the commerce of the world. This was the first occasion in which he accepted the responsibility of sailing-master and lie was naturally anxious to make a quick voyage. Before leaving New York he had searched in every direction for reliable information as to the winds and currents to be encountered, and the best path for his vessel to follow. He soon found that little was known on the subject. Here was a deplorable want which the man of genius resolved he would one day supply. It was on this voyage also that he observed and began to study the curious Phenomenon of the 'low barometer' off Cape Horn, and it was upon this subject that he wrote his first scientific paper for publication, which appeared in the American 'Journal of Science.' But the labours of his pen did not end here, for it was on this cruise also that lie began to prepare for the press a work on navigation, the, materials for which he had been gathering together in his mind for several years. (A Life of Matthew Fontain Maury, Diana Fontaine Maury Corbin, 1888 AD p21-23)
Goshen Pass Monument with inscription The Inscription on bronze plaque: MATTHEW FONTAINE MAURY PATHFINDER OF THE SEAS THE GENIUS WHO FIRST SNATCHED FROM THE OCEAN AND ATMOSPHERE THE SECRET OF THEIR LAWS. Born January 14th, 1806 Died at Lexington, Va., February 1st, 1873 Carried through Goshen Pass to his Final Resting Place in Richmond, Virginia. EVERY MARINER FOR COUNTLESS AGES AS HE TAKES HIS CHART TO SHAPE HIS COURSE ACROSS THE SEAS, WILL THINK OF THEE. HIS INSPIRATION HOLY WRIT Psalms 8 and 107, Verses 8, 23 and 24 Ecclesiastes Chap. 1, Verse 8 A TRIBUTE BY HIS NATIVE STATE VIRGINIA. 1923 From: The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930
Today the stream through the picturesque and historic gorge is called Maury River, and the winding road from Lexington to Goshen is Maury Highway. Halfway through the pass, under the shadow of a cliff and bordered by spruce and rhododendron, stands a granite shaft to Maury, erected in 1923 by the State of Virginia. A bust-relief of Maury is at the top of the bronze tablet on the shaft, and below it is this inscription:
MATTHEW FONTAINE MAURY PATHFINDER OF THE SEAS THE GENIUS WHO FIRST SNATCHED FROM THE OCEAN AND ATMOSPHERE THE SECRET OF THEIR LAWS. Born January 14th, 1806 Died at Lexington, Va., February 1st, 1873 Carried through Goshen Pass to his Final Resting Place in Richmond, Virginia. EVERY MARINER FOR COUNTLESS AGES AS HE TAKES HIS CHART TO SHAPE HIS COURSE ACROSS THE SEAS, WILL THINK OF THEE. HIS INSPIRATION HOLY WRIT Psalms 8 and 107, Verses 8, 23 and 24 Ecclesiastes Chap. 1, Verse 8 A TRIBUTE BY HIS NATIVE STATE VIRGINIA. 1923 At the base of the granite shaft is a huge iron anchor; and around the small enclosure is the long anchor chain. On the anchor is a small bronze plate with this inscription: "THE PATHFINDER OF THE SEAS" IN APPRECIATION OF HIS SERVICES TO THE MARINERS OF THE WORLD VIRGINIA PILOT ASSOCIATION (The Pathfinder of the Seas, The Life of Matthew Fontaine Maury, John W. Wayland, 1930) Information from Brooke Ramsey and Sarah Dobson at the University of Virginia The Matthew Fontaine Maury Monument was the last of the Confederate monuments to be erected on Monument Avenue. The Women's Club of Virginia was the driving force behind the construction of this monument. Donations from the State of Virginia, the City of Richmond, and private benefactors were collected by the Women's Club in order to amass $60,000 which was the cost of the monument. The site selected was at Belmont and Monument, marking the second end point of Monument Avenue, the first had been The Jefferson Davis Monument. The Matthew Fontaine Maury Monument was unveiled on November 11, 1929. The sculptor of The Stonewall Jackson Monument, Richmonder William F. Sievers, was also selected to design the Maury monument. In this sculpture, Maury is seated in an armchair holding a book. Behind him stands a large base on which rests a globe of the world and relief figures moving about it. The vertical axis established by Maury in the armchair and the globe hovering above is balanced by the horizontal axis of Maury's elbows splayed outward on the armrests of the chair. Sievers has rendered Maury sitting in a contemplative mood, his head is tilted downward as if the weight of this world bears upon him. Sievers composed this statue with images of water, land, and sky, relating to Maury's achievements in oceanography, navigation, and meteorology. Jellyfish are sculpted in the arms of the chair, and bats, swallows, and fish encircle the base supporting the globe. Arguably the most arresting aspect of the statue, the globe tilts off-axis with figures of humans and animals projecting from it. Sculpted in high relief, the expressive nature of these figures lends a feeling of movement and rotation to the sculpture. The action of the figures is divided into scenes of desperation and struggle on water and land. In the water scene, Sievers created a group of people clinging to a capsized boat; the boat is being towed, possibly to safety, by a female figure. In the land scene a male farmer and his son appear to be running from danger and are followed by their dog and cow. The farmer leads this group with his hand outstretched to the woman towing the capsized boat from the water scene. The Matthew Fontaine Maury Monument stands at the end of the historic section of statues on Monument Avenue. Stylistically speaking, this sculpture is the most complex of all the monuments. Sievers captured an entire range of experiences in this monument and equated Maury with playing a part in all of them. His talents reach beyond the Civil War, and for this reason the statue has been referred to as the man of peace amidst the other Confederate war heroes. (A web site created and maintained by Brooke Ramsey and Sarah Dobson at the University of Virginia.) Compiled by Steve Rudd Go To Start: WWW.BIBLE.CA |
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
Are Loving Same-Sex Relationships Morally Correct?
You asked me some time ago if same-sex relationship was morally correct if the two people loved each other and treated each other lovingly? Since “God is love,” wouldn’t this fall under a morally correct relationship? You mentioned that in many heterosexual relationships there is a lack of love and at times even abuse.
Isn’t a loving same-sex relationship more morally correct than an unloving heterosexual relationship? Wow, good question. I’ll try to answer with my limited experience in this field. But here goes.
Your reasoning sounds very good, and my logical response would be, “Sure, why not?” I am sure most people would agree with that line of thinking. “If two people love each other, why shouldn’t they be free to share their love without constraint.”
But the trouble is and you know me for this, I never just did what the majority believed was right. I’m a free-thinker. While others at college were taking courses so they could have a good career in front of them, I was searching for the truth and the courses I took were in that context. When it came to Vietnam, others were looking for a deferment, or a way to get out of the draft, while I was looking for the morally correct stand to take. Then in November, 1971, I found God and that changed everything. Jesus has transformed my life. He saved me from having to go to Vietnam, and I promised Him that if He did that, I would serve Him all the days of my life.
I have been reading, and studying, and trying to follow the light of God’s word for 47 years. Even before, as a Catholic, I was trying to follow the dictates of my conscience and Catholic upbringing since my Holy Communion, at age seven. So all together, I have been trying to follow God for 62 years. But it wasn’t until I was 22 years old that I received Christ as my Savior and began an intense study of God’s word searching for truth.
I have come to realize that it’s not what I think, but what God says that matters. When I received Christ that Sunday morning back in November, 1971, I was desparate for answers. I was facing an arrest by the FBI as I had refused military induction. Upon praying the prayer of salvation, I also prayed to receive the Holy Spirit. Jesus had promised us to send the Holy Spirit as a guide into all truth. I needed to know the truth and what I should do with the military breathing down my neck. And so, I joined the Jesus People group and studied God’s word with them for three months.
That is what I have tried to do for the last 47 years: follow the light of God’s word as it speaks to my heart. Have I always been a good obedient student? No, I haven’t. I have not only made mistakes, but I have willingly done things which I knew would cause me to lose God’s blessing. But the Lord is a patient, and a loving Father and I have learned over time, especially through the school of hard knocks.
So, after the three-month course with the Jesus People, I was asked if I wanted to help in a training center for new disciples in Boston. In Boston, I learned to go out and share my new faith with young students at the universities. I made telefone calls and found doners who wanted to support the Youth Center. I made contacts with local businesses who wanted to donate goods or services that we needed. But the most enjoyable experience was leading others to Jesus.
I remember one young guy we met who had had a bad drug trip and couldn’t talk. We had been singing in the park and he followed us home and didn’t want to leave. The Lord showed us to put him on the headphones so he could listen to an old Christian radio program that we had on cassetes. We did that and after 3 days, little by little, he came down from his drug trip and starting talking again.
Another girl we met had also had a very bad drug trip and had a spirit of fear or paranoia. We put her on the cassetes and she too recovered. What was it that brought her back to reality and chased away the spirit of fear? It was God’s word. God’s word spoken in love had a powerful effect on the minds of these young people.
God’s word also was transforming my life and thinking habits. God’s word was giving me new interests and desires. Like Apostle Paul said, “If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature. Old things are passed away. All things become new.”[1] I was, also, becoming a new man. My mind was being transformed by the reading and the following of God’s word. As Paul wrote, “Be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.”[2]
What I learned as a young Christian was that I needed to follow Christ. I needed to follow what He said, and not my own reasoning, or what the world was saying. But how do we know what Christ wants us to do? Well, the first place to look is in His Word. Go to His Word. What did Jesus say in His sermons and words to His disciples? Read and study His Words.
Where do we find Jesus’ Words? They are written in the New Testament. As His followers we should read and study His words and let them speak to our hearts. We should follow the Light and the Truth that they teach, and let them enlighten the darkness of our hardened hearts. We need to resist the Devil, that he may flee from us, and that we may be born anew into God’s kingdom of Love and Light.
The Bible says that, “The word of God is quick (alive) and powerful, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” In other words, knowing God’s word gives us His discernment. It helps us know right from wrong. Like Abraham Lincoln said, “In regards to this Great Book, (the Bible), I have but to say, it is the best gift God has given to man. All the good the Saviour gave the world was communicated through this book. But for it, we could not know right from wrong. All things most desireable for man’s welfare, here and hereafter, are found portrayed with in it.”
We need to decide who is our ultimate authority concerning morality? Ourselves? Our peers? The State? The Supreme Court? Or God? Only the last one, God, is an absolute authority. All the rest are relative and in the long run cannot be trusted to give us the truth. Our own feelings are fleeting and lie to us. They are here today and gone tomorrow. Even our own reasoning is subject to peer pressure, feelings, dislikes, prejudices, and our sexual desires like Aldous Huxley so candidly confessed.
He said, “I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning, consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in puré metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom.”[3]
In the Psalms we read, “Wherewithall shall a young man cleanse his way, by taking heed thereto according to Thy word.”[4] Will we trust that God’s word is true? Will we believe that God has preserved it down through the centuries just like he said He would? Simon Greenleaf, one of the 19th centuries foremost academics in the field of law and founder of the Harvard Law School said, “Of the Divine character of the Bible, I think, no man who deals honestly with his own mind and heart can entertain a reasonable doubt. For myself, I must say, that having for many years made the evidences of Christianity the subject of close study, the result has been a firm and increasing conviction of the authenticity and plenary inspiration of the Bible. It is indeed the Word of God.”
Apostle Peter says, if we are really seeking God, we should be like little babies who suck at their mother’s breast, but instead, we should be sucking from the word of God. He goes on to say, “We have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty.”[5]Peter then goes on to share a testimony of his experience on the Holy Mountain with Jesus and three other of His disciples, when they heard the voice from heaven saying, “This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased.”[6]
Peter says he heard the voice. He had an experience. But then he says there is something even better than his relative, subjective, personal experience. He goes on and says, “We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts.”[7]
When the lights go out and there is no light, we are drawn to whatever light there is. That light becomes our salvation. Peter is telling us we should be drawn to God’s word and read it and study it until the light of Christ enlightens our minds. If we seriously study God’s word and suck from it like new born babes suck from their mother’s breats, ultimately we will have that awakening experience and understand what Christ meant by being born again. That’s why Augustine said, “Seek not to understand that you might believe, but seek to believe that you might understand.” C.S. Lewis said it like this, “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen, not only because I can see it, but because by it I can see everything else.”
Unless we are born again, we cannot see or understand the kingdom of God. But that second birth is similar to that experience that Neo, in the first Matrix movie, goes through when he takes the red pill and goes down the rabbit hole. His whole mindset had to change, because his whole world view was a lie. We need to ask the Lord to send us that infilling of His Holy Spirit so that we will find the truth, and not be fooled by the lies.
If Jesus is really the Son of God we should follow Him and His teachings. It’s just that simple. Jesus said, “Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.”[8]But Jesus is actually quoting from the Old Testament. In fact, much of what Jesus said was in reference to the Old Testament scriptures.
Even when Jesus cried on the cross, “My God, my God, why have you forseken me?” He was quoting from Psalm 22, the very psalm that prophecized the Messiah’s crucifixion. Jesus constantly referred to Himself as the “Son of Man.” Who was the Son of Man? The Son of Man is a reference to a prophecy by Daniel the prophet about God the Father giving the ruling and reigning of the Kingdom into the hands of the “Son of Man,” or commonly referred to as the Messiah. Jesus was calling himself the Messiah.
If we read the New Testament with an open heart and mind, I think we will come to the conclusion that Apostle Paul was the most influential disciple of Jesus. Of the twenty-seven books in the New Testament, thirteen are written by Paul and another, the book of Acts, though written by Luke, is largely based on the witnessing experiences of Apostle Paul. Paul openly stood up to the religious compromises of both Peter and James teaching that faith in Christ alone was the soul necessity for salvation.
Coming back to the original question that you made me, “What is wrong about a loving same-sex relationship?” how am I to answer? I first prayed and asked God to help my reasoning. Second, I looked to His word for what He has said before. His word is the standard which I use to judge all truth and error. Here’s what Paul wrote in his letter to the Colossians in which he mentions sexual relationships among other things.
“Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. As such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.”[9]
In Paul’s letter to the Romans, known like the Greeks for their sexual liberties, Paul addresses the subject of same-sex relationships. He writes, “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold back the truth in unrighteousness (In other words, they fight against what they deep down inside know to be true.); for the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.”
Paul is telling us that nature proclaims the existence of God. Many great men of the past have made the same observation. Isaac Newton, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Albert Einstein are a few who said something very similar.
Paul continues, “Because that, when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were they thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.”[10]
“Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleaness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves; who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their woman did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.”[11] “Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.”[12]
My Friend, these are pretty strong words. Paul is saying that same-sex relationships are wrong according to God’s standard. He’s not saying that two males cannot have a loving relationship, nor two females. But he is saying that crossing the barrier and participating in same-sex is wrong.
This is not something new that Paul made up. God had clearly made His guidelines to sexual behavior and given them to Moses to share with the Israelites on their way to the Promised Land. You can read them in Leviticus chapter 18. Those guidelines are still the same, but the strong judgments are not. God’s law is now ministered with love and mercy, not with the rigor of the Old Testament law. The Law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith in His work for our salvation. We have all sinned and come short of God’s goodness and it’s only His goodness and mercy that saves us, not our own.
The following is the list of people God tells Moses that the Israelites should not have sex with: Your father or your mother, your father’s wife, your sister, or half-sister, your grandchild, or step-grandchild, your aunt, your uncle’s wife, your brother’s wife, your wife’s sister, a woman who is on her period, your neighbor’s wife. The Lord finishes up by saying, “Thou shall not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shall thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith.”[13] The reason I put that list there is so that you can see that it is not just same-sex relationships that God puts guidelines, but other sexual relationships.
God has reasons for limiting our sexual relations to heterosexual ones, though he doesn’t give us all the details, some of them we can probably figure out ourselves. But we can not get a round the fact that God’s word unequivocally states that same-sex relationships are wrong. It’s so because God says so. But again, it’s not just same-sex relationships that are wrong. Those others are also wrong.
God has His reasons, and He has set down His guidelines. I believe He does all things in love for our own sake. If we really believe the Bible is God’s word, then we should follow what it teaches. I know it’s not always easy. That’s why Paul tells us, “Set your affections on things above, not on things on the earth. Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleaness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence (desire or lust), and covetousness, which is idolatry.”[14] We have got to do some fighting and resisting against these strong tendencies or desires especially because they bring us such pleasure.
When the children of Israel were getting ready to cross the Jordon River to go into the Promised Land, Joshua, the new leader on Moses’ death, held up the Scripture left by Moses and shouted, “This book of the Law shall not depart out of thy mouth, but thou shalt mediatate therein day and night, that thou may observe to do according to all that is written therein, for then thou shall make thy way prosperous, and then thou shall have good success.”[15]
Please, Friend, dig into God’s word with an honest heart and mind and let God Himself talk to you through His Word. God’s word is food for our soul, and strength for the battle. Read, study, and memorize it and you won’t be disappointed, but transformed into the man of God He wants you to be. Jesus is calling, “Take up your cross, and follow me.”[16]
Thanks so much for giving me the oportunity to share with you what I think about this important question. Your friendship means a lot to me. I hope my answer will cause you to read His Word for direction. I will be sending you a study Bible in the mail. There is a lot more on this subject in both the Old and New Testament. I pray that this has been a help to you, and would love to hear back from you about what you think.
We are praying for you daily and hoping we will see you again shortly. We really love you and enjoyed our time together. I hope this letter doesn’t hurt you but is a help to you.
Your friend,
Dennis
Notes:
[1] 2 Corinthinians 5: 17
[2] Romans 12: 2
[3] Aldous Huxley, “Confessions of a Professed Atheist,” June 1966
[4] Psalm 119: 34
[5] 2 Peter 1: 16
[6] 2 Peter 1: 17
[7] 2 Peter 1: 19
[8] Matthew 4: 4
[9] 2 Corinthians 6: 9-11
[10] Romans 1: 18-23
[11] Romans 1: 24-27
[12] Romans 1: 32
[13] Leviticus 18: 22-23
[14] Colossians 3: 2 and 5
[15] Joshua 1: 8
[16] Matthew 16: 24



























