Does your faith need strengthening? Are you confused and wondering if Jesus Christ is really "The Way, the Truth, and the Life?" "Fight for Your Faith" is a blog filled with interesting and thought provoking articles to help you find the answers you are seeking. Jesus said, "Seek and ye shall find." In Jeremiah we read, "Ye shall seek Me, and find Me, when ye shall seek for Me with all your heart." These articles and videos will help you in your search for the Truth.

Sunday, February 2, 2014

How much can an extra hour’s sleep change you

Michael Mosley, BBC News Magazine, 9 October 2013

It has been known for some time that the amount of sleep people get has, on average, declined over the years.

This has happened for a whole range of reasons, not least because we live in a culture where people are encouraged to think of sleep as a luxury—something you can easily cut back on. After all, that’s what caffeine is for—to jolt you back into life. But while the average amount of sleep we are getting has fallen, rates of obesity and diabetes have soared. Could the two be connected?

We wanted to see what the effect would be of increasing average sleep by just one hour. So we asked seven volunteers, who normally sleep anywhere between six and nine hours, to be studied at the University of Surrey’s Sleep Research Centre.

The volunteers were randomly allocated to two groups. One group was asked to sleep for six-and-a-half hours a night, the other got seven-and-a-half hours. After a week the researchers took blood tests and the volunteers were asked to switch sleep patterns. The group that had been sleeping six-and-a-half hours got an extra hour, the other group slept an hour less.

While we were waiting to see what effect this would have, I went to the John Radcliffe hospital in Oxford to learn more about what actually happens when we sleep.

In the Sleep Centre, they fitted me up with a portable electro-encephalograph, a device that measures brain wave activity. Then, feeling slightly ridiculous, I went home and had my seven-and-a-half hours of sleep.

The following day I went to discuss what had happened inside my head during the night with Dr Katharina Wulff.

The first thing she pointed out was that I had very rapidly fallen into a state of deep sleep. Deep sleep sounds restful, but during it our brains are actually working hard. One of the main things the brain is doing is moving memories from short-term storage into long-term storage, allowing us more short-term memory space for the next day. If you don’t get adequate deep sleep then these memories will be lost.

You might think: “I’ll cut back during the week and then make up for it at the weekend.” Unfortunately it doesn’t work like that, because memories need to be consolidated within 24 hours of being formed.

Since deep sleep is so important for consolidating memories it is a good idea if you are revising or perhaps taking an exam to make sure that you’re getting a reasonable night’s sleep. In one study, people who failed to do so did 40% worse than their contemporaries.

Deep sleep only lasts for a few hours. My electrode results showed that during the night my brain went through multiple phases of another kind of activity, called REM sleep.

“This is the phase when you are usually paralysed—so you can’t move,” Wulff explained. But the eye muscles are not paralysed, and that’s why it’s called rapid eye movement sleep.”

During REM sleep an extraordinary thing happens. One of the stress-related chemicals in the brain, noradrenalin, is switched off. It’s the only time, day or night, this happens. It allows us to remain calm while our brains reprocess all the experiences of the day, helping us come to terms with particularly emotional events.

We get more REM sleep in the last half of the night. Which means that if you are woken unexpectedly, your brain may not have dealt with all your emotions—which could leave you stressed and anxious. Drinking alcohol late at night is not a good idea as it reduces your REM sleep while it’s being processed in your body.

Back at the University of Surrey our sleep volunteers had finished their second week of the experiment. What we wanted to see was the effect switching from six-and-a-half hours to seven-and-a-half hours, or vice versa, would have on our volunteers.

Computer tests revealed that most of them struggled with mental agility tasks when they had less sleep, but the most interesting results came from the blood tests that were run.

Dr Simon Archer and his team at Surrey University were particularly interested in looking at the genes that were switched on or off in our volunteers by changes in the amount that we had made them sleep.

“We found that overall there were around 500 genes that were affected,” Archer explained. “Some which were going up, and some which were going down.”

What they discovered is that when the volunteers cut back from seven-and-a-half to six-and-a-half hours’ sleep a night, genes that are associated with processes like inflammation, immune response and response to stress became more active. The team also saw increases in the activity of genes associated with diabetes and risk of cancer. The reverse happened when the volunteers added an hour of sleep.

So the clear message from this experiment was that if you are getting less than seven hours’ sleep a night and can alter your sleep habits, even just a little bit, it could make you healthier. “Have a lie-in, it will do you good”—that’s the kind of health message that doesn’t come along very often.

Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning’s conversion

Jim Denison, Denision Forum, Jan 28, 2014

As this year’s Super Bowl approaches, all eyes are on the weather. While some are watching conditions in the sky, this week we’re thinking about the players on the ground. Each day we’ll discover the Christian commitment of one of the Super Bowl athletes. Today we’ll hear from Peyton Manning, quarterback of the Denver Broncos.

This season, Manning scored more touchdowns and passed for more yards than any quarterback in history. He is famous for his charity work, very funny commercials, and numerous appearances on TV shows such as Saturday Night Live. What is not as well known is that he has been a committed Christian for more than two decades.

In his book Manning, co-authored with his father, Peyton tells the story of his conversion: “My faith has been number one since I was thirteen years old and heard from the pulpit on a Sunday morning in New Orleans a simple question: ‘If you died today, are you one hundred percent sure you’d go to heaven?’

“It was a big church, and I felt very small, but my heart was pounding. The minister invited those who would like that assurance through Jesus Christ to raise their hands, and I did. Then he invited us to come forward, to take a stand, and my heart really started pounding and from where we sat, it looked like a mile to the front. But I got up and did it, and I committed my life to Christ, and that faith has been most important to me ever since.”

Peyton says his four priorities, in order, are: faith, family, friends, and football. He testifies, “My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.” He describes his spiritual life: “I pray every night, sometimes long prayers about a lot of things and a lot of people, but I don’t talk about it or brag about it because that’s between God and me, and I’m no better than anyone else in God’s sight.”

He doesn’t pray to win games. Rather, “I pray to keep both teams injury free, and personally, that I use whatever talent I have to the best of my ability.” And he has made this character commitment: “Dad says it can take twenty years to make a reputation, and five minutes to ruin it. I want my reputation to be able to make it through whatever five-minute crises I run into. I’m a lot more comfortable knowing where my help is.”

The minister who led a 13-year-old boy to Christ had no idea the platform God would entrust to that young man. Dwight Moody noted, “There are many of us that are willing to do great things for the Lord, but few of us are willing to do little things.” Here’s the paradox: in God’s hands, little things done for his glory are great things for his Kingdom.

What will you do for Jesus today?

Saturday, February 1, 2014

25 Things I Know Now That I’m 60

By Sally Stich, Grandparents.com, January 20, 2014

Before I turned 60, I had moments of dread unlike any big birthday before. But, as I discovered, turning 60 is a huge milestone—one to be embraced. It’s the beginning of a decade informed by wisdom, self-acceptance, love for family and friends, and best of all, great discounts that make me proud to be my age.

Here are 25 things I learned when I entered my seventh decade.

1. Patience, patience, patience. At this age, I understand that patience is the greatest virtue. That 16-year-old waitress who messed up my order could’ve been my daughter. That elderly gentleman driving 25 miles per hour reminds me of my dad. Now, I think twice before I snap, hoping that when I goof up or drive in two lanes, someone will grant me the same gift.

2. Toxic relationships aren’t worth it. The clock’s ticking, and I’m not wasting one more minute on people who bring me down, like the friend who is always complaining that I’m not supportive enough or the family member who always belittles me. Take my lead and say “Adios!” out loud or mentally wave good-bye.

3. Let the five pounds stay there. Long shirts or tunics your best friend? Good for you! I no longer obsess over those last five pounds—the hardest to lose—because it’s simply not worth the deprivation.

4. Senior discounts rock. Two bucks here, 30 percent off there—it adds up, and it seems almost naughty to get a senior discount when I feel so much younger than my age. Go to Gift Card Granny for a list of 196 discounts for seniors.

5. Being called “Ma’am” makes me feel old. Truthfully, when you call me “Ma’am” it makes me feel like I’m my mother-in-law, who is old. And don’t call me “young lady” either. It’s condescending. I don’t need any special title just because I’ve hit 60. I’m still 40 inside my head.

6. Forgetting something does not mean Alzheimer’s. Every time I forget a word or a name, I’m convinced I have Alzheimer’s. My friends are convinced they are getting Alzheimer’s, too. It seems to be the biggest worry among people over 60. (For the record, I don’t have Alzheimer’s because I researched the difference between normal memory loss and Alzheimer’s, and you can, too.) Forgetting things is a normal part of aging. It’s when we can’t remember how to do daily tasks or something that just happened, that we need to worry.

7. “Organ recitals” are very popular. I’m not talking about music, I’m talking about: “My back went out,” “My cholesterol’s too high,” “I’m having a colonoscopy tomorrow” or “My blood pressure is off the charts.” I personally don’t enjoy this kind of banter—it’s boring and aging—but I’ve learned that it comes with the territory. People like to talk about their ailments. The best thing you can do is sit politely (or excuse yourself for a glass of water) until the subject changes.

8. Sunscreen = good, sun = bad. I look at my skin and my hands and see brown spots (or age spots). These are the result of too much sun and not enough sunscreen in my youth. I’ve reversed the formula—less sun and lots of sunscreen. I’ve also discovered that a good foundation can hide those spots.

9. Facebook isn’t a waste of time. I suddenly delight in connecting with pals from my past, more so than ever before. Sure, I have wonderful friends in my adult life, but there’s something uplifting, energizing and meaningful about finding an old friend on Facebook, a friend who knew me when I was in my formative years. If you’re not on Facebook, you’re missing something.

10. Not planning for the inevitable is stupid. I’ve started thinking about things like end-of-life issues more seriously than ever before. Why? I have friends whose parents have recently died and left everything a mess. I vow to get everything in place so my kids don’t have to make tough decisions while weeping over my hospital bed.

11. Being an over-achiever doesn’t matter. Good grades in college, career success—the past doesn’t matter to me as much now. My mind is all about the present. Where once I did most activities to bump up my resumé, now I choose activities that keep my brain stimulated, which in turn makes me stimulating—and hopefully good company. At this age, I want to be current, not a dinosaur.

12. Romance still exists. As empty nesters, my husband and I split a whole cherry pie for dinner, if that’s what we want. We sleep in till 10 a.m., if there’s no compelling reason to get up. We are all about us as often as we can be. We’ve figured out that sharing the little things together keeps the spark alive.

13. Being proud of my kids isn’t boastful. I’ve lived long enough to see the fruits of my parental labor, and after years of hard work and financial sacrifice, I now sit back and see what kind of adults my children have become. I’m pleased with the results, and I think it’s okay to talk about that with friends and family.

14. Being fit is about strength, not toned abs. In a perfect world, I’d like a better butt and flat abs, but I’ll settle for feeling good and strong. “At this age, it’s about endurance, moderate strengthening, balance and stretching,” says Dr. Carly Stewart, medical expert at MoneyCrashers.com. “It’s about maintaining muscle mass so you don’t get physically weaker as you age.”

15. My hairstylist is my anti-aging consultant. When she suggested I go with a shorter ‘do because shorter styles are less aging than longer ones, I said, “Lop it off.” She was right. I get many more positive comments now.

16. Frizzy, dry hair looks bad. I now realize my dry, brittle frizzy hair (from years of processing) is the appearance equivalent of an unmade bed in an otherwise neat room. The eye only notices the messiest thing. Here again, I turn to my hairdresser for anti-aging help,

17. Invest in a good pair of tweezers. I hate to admit it, but I’ve noticed a few coarse hairs growing on my chinny chin chin—yuck! Really good, expensive tweezers can work wonders.

18. Laugh every day. An episode of The Big Bang Theory, a Dave Barry column, time with a silly friend—find little things that make you laugh every day. Besides being fun, laughter also has proven health benefits. It lowers blood pressure, reduces stress hormones, even suppresses pain. And it’s something I can do when other parts of my body fail me.

19. Problem-solving comes easier. Whether it’s because of changes in the brain that actually improve certain skills as we age, or the fact that you just don’t get to be 60 without knowing how best to get from A to B, wading through the details to figure out how to solve a problem is so much simpler than it was when we were younger.

20. Control isn’t the holy grail. Between my 20s and 50s, I believed I knew the answer to almost everything. I didn’t just suggest solutions; I inserted myself into the solution. By the time I got to my late 50s, I was exhausted, frustrated and disappointed that no one seemed to appreciate my “help.” At 60, a light bulb went on. Control does not equal happiness. The world operated just fine without my interference. The kids goof up and they can actually problem solve without me. My husband does the laundry his way and I now say, “Thank you,” rather than, “Thank you, but….”.

21. Turkeys don’t have it so good. Turkeys and I share the same neck—a fleshy, jiggly wattle. Sigh. I now invest in cool scarves and high necked shirts. And turning up the collar of a button-down shirt works wonders.

22. Forget presents; just give me your presence. When my friends ask what I want for my birthday, I tell them I want to do something together—lunch at a new restaurant, a trip to the museum, an afternoon movie, a walk. I don’t need more tchotchkes; I want time with my gal pals. It’s experiences that we remember.

23. Protecting my bones is worth it. I do strength training, get 10 minutes of vitamin D exposure several days a week (without sunscreen; it defeats the purpose), and I’ve added calcium to my diet in the form of milk, fat-free plain yogurt, fish and dark greens. I’ve also reduced my chances of falling and breaking a bone by removing small area rugs and getting up slowly to avoid dizziness. Every little bit helps.

24. It’s okay to pamper myself. After years of putting everyone else first…Need I say more?

25. Take every opportunity to express love and gratitude. I’ve reached this milestone, so why wait to tell others how I feel? My favorite phrases: “I love you” and “thank you.”

Of East and West

By Eric Metaxas, Breakpoint, January 29, 2014

If I asked you to describe the state of Christianity in Europe, you’d probably answer “not good.” And there’d be ample reason to do so. Most of us are familiar with the depressing statistics regarding church attendance in Western Europe and Scandinavia.

But there is more to Europe than Britain, France, and Sweden. And in Central and Eastern Europe, a different story is being written.

This story was the subject of a recent First Things article by Filip Mazurczak. In it, Mazurczak reveals to readers what is going on in former communist societies such as Hungary and Croatia. For instance, while the European Union omitted any mention of Europe’s Christian heritage in the preamble to its constitution, Hungary’s new constitution “ties Christianity to Hungarian nationhood.”

By way of additional contrast to the secularized E.U., the document “defines marriage as the union of a man and woman, [and] speaks of the rights of unborn Hungarians.”

An even more encouraging story is unfolding in Croatia. In December, two-thirds of the population there voted to amend the constitution to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman. For a nation aspiring for E.U. membership, this definitely went against the grain.

In fact, as Mazurczak pointed out, left to their own devices, Croatia’s elites would have caved to E.U. pressure on this issue. But they weren’t left to their own devices: fully one-fifth of Croatia’s adult population signed a petition demanding a referendum on the issue.

You shouldn’t be surprised to learn that the reaction to this and other examples of Eastern Europeans rediscovering their Christian heritage has been, frankly, hysterical. The Guardian newspaper called them “symptomatic of a Europe-wide slide back to the worst nightmares of the 20th century.”

It lumped the Croatian vote with “the French Roma expulsion, the Golden Dawn in Greece … Hungary’s far-right turn, [and] … the rise of antisemitism in Sweden [and] Islamophobia in Denmark” as “symptoms” of “the rotten heart of Europe.”

A similar paranoid intolerance was on display when American media outlets made a big deal out of cooperation between American Christians and their Russian counterparts on issues concerning the family.

What these commentators could not fathom was that anyone would disagree with them, either concerning the nature of marriage or the role of religion in public life. So, when they weren’t labeling it “moderate fascism” or part of a larger “conspiracy,” they blamed it on high levels of unemployment which, in turn, led to intolerance of minorities.

What they’re unwilling or incapable of considering is that the turn toward Christianity in Central and Eastern Europe is born of an acknowledgment that something vital is missing from people’s lives. People who were force-fed atheism have a hard-earned appreciation of how empty life can be when God is automatically excluded from the equation.

In Russia, “more monasteries and parishes are reopened, growing numbers of Russians profess belief in God, and more young Russians are choosing a religious vocation.” Vladimir Putin may be taking advantage of Russians’ hunger for God, but he didn’t create that hunger. Seventy-four years of state-sponsored atheism, and the wreck it left in its wake, did that all by itself.

Thus we are left with, in Mazurczak’s words, “a West that has largely abandoned its religious roots, and an East that is rediscovering its heritage.” Two completely different stories.

Exercise to Age Well, Whatever Your Age

By Gretchen Reynolds, NY Times, Jan. 29, 2014

Offering hope and encouragement to the many adults who have somehow neglected to exercise for the past few decades, a new study suggests that becoming physically active in middle age, even if someone has been sedentary for years, substantially reduces the likelihood that he or she will become seriously ill or physically disabled in retirement.

The new study joins a growing body of research examining successful aging, a topic of considerable scientific interest, as the populations of the United States and Europe grow older, and so do many scientists. When the term is used in research, successful aging means more than simply remaining alive, although that, obviously, is the baseline requirement. Successful aging involves minimal debility past the age of 65 or so, with little or no serious chronic disease diagnoses, depression, cognitive decline or physical infirmities that would prevent someone from living independently.

Previous epidemiological studies have found that several, unsurprising factors contribute to successful aging. Not smoking is one, as is moderate alcohol consumption, and so, unfairly or not, is having money. People with greater economic resources tend to develop fewer health problems later in life than people who are not well-off.

But being physically active during adulthood is particularly important. In one large-scale study published last fall that looked at more than 12,000 Australian men aged between 65 and 83, those who engaged in about 30 minutes of exercise five or so times per week were much healthier and less likely to be dead 11 years after the start of the study than those who were sedentary, even when the researchers adjusted for smoking habits, education, body mass index and other variables.

Whether exercise habits need to have been established and maintained throughout adulthood, however, in order to affect aging has been less clear. If someone has slacked off on his or her exercise resolutions during young adulthood and early middle-age, in other words, is it too late to start exercising and still have a meaningful impact on health and longevity in later life?

To address that issue, researchers with the Physical Activity Research Group at University College London and other institutions turned recently to the large trove of data contained in the ongoing English Longitudinal Study of Aging, which has tracked the health habits of tens of thousands of British citizens for decades, checking in with participants multiple times and asking them how they currently eat, exercise, feel and generally live.

For the study, appearing in the February issue of the British Journal of Sports Medicine, scientists isolated responses from 3,454 healthy, disease-free British men and women aged between 55 and 73 who, upon joining the original study of aging, had provided clear details about their exercise habits, as well as their health, and who then had repeated that information after an additional eight years.

The researchers stratified the chosen respondents into those who were physically active or not at the study’s start, using the extremely generous definition of one hour per week of moderate or vigorous activity to qualify someone as active. Formal exercise was not required. An hour per week of “gardening, cleaning the car, walking at a moderate pace, or dancing” counted, said Mark Hamer, a researcher at University College London who led the study.

The scientists then re-sorted the respondents after the eight-year follow-up, marking them as having remained active, become active, remained inactive or become inactive as they moved into and through middle-age. They also quantified each respondent’s health throughout those years, based on diagnosed diabetes, heart disease, dementia or other serious conditions. And the scientists directly contacted their respondents, asking each to complete objective tests of memory and thinking, and a few to wear an activity monitor for a week, to determine whether self-reported levels of physical activity matched actual levels of physical activity. (They did.)

In the eight years between the study’s start and end, the data showed, those respondents who had been and remained physically active aged most successfully, with the lowest incidence of major chronic diseases, memory loss and physical disability. But those people who became active in middle-age after having been sedentary in prior years, about 9 percent of the total, aged almost as successfully. These late-in-life exercisers had about a seven-fold reduction in their risk of becoming ill or infirm after eight years compared with those who became or remained sedentary, even when the researchers took into account smoking, wealth and other factors.

Those results reaffirm both other science and common sense. A noteworthy 2009 study of more than 2,000 middle-aged men, for instance, found that those who started to exercise after the age of 50 were far less likely to die during the next 35 years than those who were and remained sedentary.

But in this study, the volunteers did not merely live longer; they lived better than those who were not active, making the message inarguable for those of us in mid-life. “Build activity into your daily life,” Dr. Hamer said. Or, in concrete terms, if you don’t already, dance, wash your car and, if your talents allow (mine don’t), combine the two.

Prioritization

By Scott McDowell, 99u, Jan. 28, 2014

We live in a culture of urgency. Most of us work in always-switched-on companies where everything feels urgent. Call backs, emails, and meetings are wrought with peak energy.

The constant influx of information from social media, emails, clients, advertising, etc., makes it difficult to decipher what’s important, what to abandon and what to work on now. Can you even add up the sheer number of small decisions you make each day?

The media theorist and writer Douglas Rushkoff describes his concept of “present shock” as “one big now… where everything is happening so fast it may as well be simultaneous.” He says the incoming barrage of information has degraded our ability to create long-term plans, and instead sets us up to react, react, react.

“The Principle of Priority states (a) you must know the difference between what is urgent and what is important, and (b) you must do what’s important first.”—Steven Pressfield, The War of Art

Urgency is a great motivator, but a flimsy one. The problem with urgency is that no one can remember what’s really important, so we spend too much time and energy on activities that don’t matter.

For several months, I’ve been experimenting with relentless prioritizing. I prioritize twice a day, as a ritual. The process for figuring out what is important is really just a simple series of questions:

Do I really have to do this now?
If so, is it “The Most Important Thing?”
If not, where does it fit relative to the other tasks?
Is someone waiting on me for this?
If so, when do they need it?
Does working/not working on this now have long-term consequences that I’m missing?

Part of reducing present shock is refusing to react. The best practice I’ve come up with is to not react to demands as they come in. Instead, I recognize them, and add them to a running list. Only when I have a proper break do I put them on the to-do list. The moment we enter “reaction” mode, we’ve surrendered our day to the whims of others.

The first check-in occurs in the middle of the day, before or after lunch. Am I working on what I said I was going to work on? Am I making progress? Am I working on the most important thing? I re-order appropriately. I’ve saved myself lots of frustration by course-correcting in the middle of the work day.

Check-in #2 is right before bed, when I plan for the next day. That way when I start at my desk in the morning, I don’t fall back into my inbox and back into response mode. And, if I do find I’m constantly reacting to the flood, I show myself some compassion. Drifting isn’t always a bad thing.

Being consistent about prioritization has produced interesting results. My major projects are moving along nicely. I feel less harried. The things I choose not to do, I choose purposefully. I’m able to focus longer and get back on track when necessary.

Friday, January 31, 2014

The Dead Forests Of Antarctica

By Darmon Richter, Atlas Obscura, 27 Jan 2014

As a continent, Antarctica is often overlooked. Its total surface area stands in excess of 14 million km², which places it ahead of Europe in terms of size—and makes it almost twice the size of Australia. As much as 98% of the continent’s surface is covered in thick, compacted ice, reaching an average depth of over a mile. The continent is beset by some of the fiercest winds on the planet, and temperatures have been reported to drop as low as -129 °F… the lowest temperature ever recorded anywhere.

Despite being the most inhospitable place on the planet however, recent scientific discoveries suggest that this forgotten continent—sometimes nicknamed the “Great White Desert”—may in fact have once been carpeted in forest.

The discovery has come in the form of fossilized impressions of wood and leaves in the region of Antarctica’s Mount Achernar. Even the stumps of ancient tree trunks have been uncovered, believed to date back to prehistoric times.

It is commonly accepted that the whole world was once far hotter than it is today.

Sarah Feakins, a biogeochemist from the University of Southern California, posits that the Antarctic coast was once lined with beeches and conifers; based on evidence taken from leaf waxes found in sediment cores extracted from the Ross Ice Shelf.

A period of warmer climate around 15 million years ago, known as the Miocene period, could have had areas of the Antarctic resembling the kind of forested tundra seen today in New Zealand or parts of Chile. Chemical study of the leaf wax samples indicates that during the summer months, the coast of Antarctica could have been as warm as 15°F.

However, due to the extreme southern placement of the continent, even a warmer Antarctica would have been without light for months on end during the winter—while summer would have been one endless day. This raises the question of how plants were able to survive, the light required for photosynthesis being unavailable for months at a time.

The answers, claims Patricia Ryberg, Assistant Professor of Biology with Park University, can be found by studying these fossilized tree samples; “because trees record physiological responses,” she explained to Live Science.

During a recent research trip, Ryberg and her team collected samples from the fossilized wood in order to analyze the rings of these ancient trees. A pattern soon emerged in the cells, showing how the forests would grow upwards and outward before turning dormant for months at a time, storing carbon in their cells.

On analysis, the pattern of growth in the Antarctic tree samples showed habits typically associated with evergreen trees. However, the fossilized leaf impressions demonstrated what appeared to have been a matting effect, layers of plant tissue indicative of a forest shedding all of its leaves at once: a deciduous forest.

The research would seem to suggest then that these were mixed forests, containing both evergreen and deciduous tree populations.

Ryberg has also hypothesized that much of the ring structure in these samples shares characteristics with tropical trees. As tropical trees experience less of a seasonal effect, they are known to go through periods of short-term dormancy; a process that results in sporadic bursts of growth. This might well account for how the forests of Antarctica were able to survive during extended periods of darkness.

In the meantime, the discovery has given new strength to speculation about life in the Great White Desert.

Antarctica is devoid of native human settlements, although there are a number of research stations scattered across the continent generally catering to anywhere between 1,000 and 5,000 visitors at a time. Besides that, the only life forms to thrive in this lost continent are those creatures specifically adapted for the extreme cold temperatures; penguins, seals and their mites, algae, fungi, and bacteria.

The discovery of fossilized forests however, would seem to suggest that life had once been more abundant here.

It’s not the first time that people have speculated about life in the extreme south. Such theories date back to antiquity; there were myths of a “Terra Australis” (or “Southern Land”) as early as the 15th century, when this mysterious mass began appearing on maps and atlases. Rather than basing such theories on survey though, it was a popular belief that the landmass in the northern hemisphere should logically be balanced by a similar mass in the south.

Antarctica was officially first sighted by an expedition of the Imperial Russian Navy in 1820. Within the next ten months both British and American ships would also confirm the sighting of a new continent.

By this time, the British explorer Matthew Flinders had already linked the name “Terra Australis” to Australia. In his 1814 book A Voyage to Terra Australis, Flinders wrote: “There is no probability, that any other detached body of land, of nearly equal extent, will ever be found in a more southern latitude.”

In 1929 this history would be challenged, however, with the discovery of a map drawn by the 15th century Turkish admiral Piri Reis. Reis’ map was inspected by the United States Hydrographic Institute, which was reportedly amazed by its accuracy as a comprehensive chart that predates the official discovery of Antarctica by 300 years.

More recently though, “evidence” has come to light which reinforces those ancient theories of Terra Australis—and has led many to speculate about ancient civilizations lost beneath the ice of Antarctica.

On one recent trip to the Antarctic, a team of American and European scientists discovered what they believed to be the tips of three ancient pyramids. The story captured the imagination of the Russian press, in particular. Voice of Russia radio reported that the team was keeping quiet about the discovery, but if the pyramids were revealed to be manmade, it would bring about “the biggest revision of human history ever made”.

Already, some commentators are making the connection between a forested, pyramid-filled Antarctica and—brace yourself—the lost civilization of Atlantis.

It seems likely that we’ll hear more over the coming years about ancient life in the forests of Antarctica, but, attractive as the notion may sound, don’t go holding your breath for news of ancient Atlantean pyramids.

Jesus É o nosso Consolo na Tristeza

J. R. Miller

Muitas pessoas, mesmo acreditando na doutrina da ressurreição sofrem com a morte de um ente querido e se privam do consolo que essa perspectiva do futuro pode nos dar. Jesus assegurou a Marta que o seu irmão se levantaria dos mortos. “Eu sei. Ele vai ressuscitar no último dia”, disse ela sem esperança de que fosse acontecer naquele momento. O seu sentimento de perda superava qualquer outro. Marta ansiava estar na companhia do irmão que havia perdido. Todos que já perderam um amigo querido tiveram esse mesmo sentimento de não conseguir extrair consolo nessa esperança, mesmo acreditando firmemente na ressurreição dos mortos.

A resposta do Mestre ao coração faminto de Marta oferece um grande consolo. Ele disse: “Eu sou a ressurreição”. É uma afirmação maravilhosa que alimenta a fé do cristão. Para Marta, pensar na ressurreição era um consolo distante e anuviado. “Eu sou a ressurreição”, Jesus disse. A ressurreição era para aquele momento, não algo distante. Suas palavras abrangiam a bem-aventurada verdade da imortalidade: “Aquele que vive e crê em Mim nunca morrerá.” Para quem está em Cristo não existe morte. O corpo morre, mas a pessoa em si continua viva. A ressurreição se dará no futuro, mas não existe um intervalo na vida do crente. Jesus não está aqui, não O vemos nem ouvimos Sua voz, não podemos tocar Suas mãos, mas Ele continua vivendo, pensando, sentindo, lembrando e amando. A morte não extinguiu absolutamente nenhum poder que Ele possui, não esmaeceu a Sua beleza nem destruiu Sua capacidade.

Esse foi o consolo que Jesus deu em parte aos Seus amigos na hora do sofrimento. Ele lhes garantiu que, para o crente, não existe morte. Os que ficam sofrem a dor da separação e sentem falta de quem partiu, mas não precisamos ter receio algum quanto àquele que parte.

Como é que Jesus consola os amigos que ficam? A história da dor e sofrimento neste lar em Betânia nos revela a resposta. As pessoas dizem: “Ele ressuscitou aquele morto, portanto consolou a família porque desfez a obra da morte e da tristeza. Se Ele fizesse o mesmo agora, em todos os casos para aqueles que a Ele clamam, então o consolo seria real”. Mas devemos lembrar que a volta de Lázaro ao lar foi uma restauração temporária. Ele voltou à vida mortal, à tentação, doenças, dores e morte. — E apenas por um tempo. Não foi uma ressurreição para a vida imortal, apenas uma restauração da vida mortal. Ele teve que passar novamente pelo mistério da morte, e da segunda vez suas irmãs experimentaram a agonia da separação e sentiram falta dele. Na realidade, o que aconteceu é que a separação final só foi adiada.

Mas Jesus deu às irmãs o consolo verdadeiro, que vai além disso. A Sua presença era um consolo, pois sabiam que as amava. Muitas vezes antes de Lázaro morrer, Jesus entrara naquele lar e ali deixara a Sua bênção. Os três irmãos sentiam paz e segurança junto com Ele. E na ocasião, até mesmo a dor que sentiam ficou menos aguda quando se encontraram com Jesus. Com certeza o amor verdadeiro, forte e terno do ser humano pode nos consolar, e a companhia de um amigo de confiança nos ajuda a superar uma perda. Mas o crente pode suportar qualquer pesar se estiver na companhia de Jesus.

O problema é que muitas vezes nós não percebemos a presença do Mestre, mesmo Ele estando ao nosso lado, então deixamos de receber o consolo do Seu amor. Maria estava ao lado do túmulo vazio com o coração dilacerado, clamando ao Senhor, que a essa altura já estava atrás dela, mas despercebido. “Ela pensou que fosse o jardineiro.” Mas um momento ela ouviu o seu nome proferido em um tom de voz familiar. Jesus Se revelou a ela, e imediatamente a sua dor deu lugar à alegria. Assim nós, muitas vezes nos vemos nas profundezas da dor, ansiando por consolo e amor, sendo que Cristo está ao nosso lado, mais perto do que um amigo de carne e osso poderia estar. Devemos secar as lágrimas e contemplar a Sua face com fé, então o Seu maravilhoso amor inundará a nossa alma, e a dor será tragada por alegria plena. Não existe a mínima dúvida quanto à presença de Cristo nos nossos momentos difíceis. A única razão porque não somos consolados é porque não percebemos a Sua presença.

Outro elemento no consolo recebido por essas irmãs de luto foi a solidariedade de Jesus. Ele tratou a primeira, e depois a segunda, com muita gentileza. Maria sofria mais do que Marta, e quando Jesus a viu chorando, Ele gemeu no espírito e ficou perturbado. Vemos então o versículo mais curto da Bíblia, que nos revela o íntimo, o coração do Mestre, e a Sua impressionante empatia.

“Jesus chorou.” Nos momentos de sofrimento é um grande consolo ter alguém ao nosso lado, saber que alguém se importa, e divide a nossa dor. Teria sido um grande consolo se João, Pedro, ou Tiago, tivessem chorado com elas diante do túmulo do irmão. Mas as lágrimas do Mestre transmitiram uma mensagem inigualável. Foi uma demonstração do maior sentimento de empatia que o mundo já viu, o próprio filho de Deus chorando junto com duas irmãs, compartilhando de um momento de profunda dor humana.

Este versículo mais curto na Bíblia não foi apenas um complemento na narrativa, mas uma revelação dos sentimentos de Jesus que transcende as eras. Sempre que um crente sofre, Alguém está ao lado, sem ser visto, dividindo a sua dor. Não é possível dimensionar o consolo que se sente ao saber que o Filho de Deus partilha do nosso sofrimento, divide conosco nossas aflições, e tomou sobre Si as nossas enfermidades. Saber disso nos ajuda a suportar com mais tranquilidade os nossos problemas.

Existe outra maneira sugestiva de Cristo consolar Seus amigos. A empatia humana é um sentimento. Nossos amigos choram conosco, dizem que sentem muito, no entanto não podem fazer muito para efetivamente nos consolar. Mas a empatia de Jesus em Betânia teve caráter prático. Ele não só demonstrou o Seu carinho pelos amigos ao vir lá de Perea para lhes fazer companhia naquele momento; Ele não demonstrou o Seu amor apenas por meio de palavras divinas de consolo que marcaram o mundo positivamente, e não só chorou com elas naquele momento de dor, mas também realizou o maior de todos os Seus milagres para lhes devolver a alegria.

Sem dúvida, milhares de outros amigos de Jesus que estavam sofrendo desejaram receber o mesmo consolo na forma de ter a pessoa amada de volta ao convívio. Muitas vezes o Senhor faz isso em resposta à oração cheia de fé. Ele poupa a vida dos que nos são queridos e que aparentemente vão partir desta vida. Ao orarmos pela cura de um amigo doente, devemos pedir com aceitação, e sempre terminar dizendo, “não seja feita a minha vontade, mas a Tua”. Conseguimos conter até mesmo o nosso grande desejo e carinho pela pessoa, no sossego e na confiança da fé. Se não for o melhor para o nosso amado, se não seria uma verdadeira bênção, se não é como Deus quer agir, então, “seja feita a Tua vontade”. Se assim orarmos, devemos acreditar que, qualquer que seja a questão ou situação, o resultado será o que Deus achar melhor. Se nossos amigos forem levados desta vida, encontraremos um consolo inexprimível na certeza de que foi a vontade de Deus. Se eles se recuperarem, então Cristo vai devolvê-los a nós, como devolveu Lázaro a Marta e Maria.

É importante entendermos claramente a questão da dor e do pesar, para que, na hora do sofrimento, possamos receber a bênção e não ficarmos sofrendo com a experiência. Deus faz com que todo pesar na nossa vida resulte em algo positivo. Jesus Cristo possui uma fonte inesgotável de consolo, basta abrirmos o coração para receber. Dessa forma passaremos pela situação difícil apoiados pelo auxílio e amor divinos, e ao final da experiência estaremos com o caráter mais forte e a vida mais abençoada. Nossos pesares determinam lições para nós, e deveríamos procurar diligentemente assimilar o que o Mestre deseja nos ensinar. Toda dor inclui também a semente da bênção, e deveríamos nos certificar de dar a essa semente a oportunidade de crescer para podermos colher resultados. Toda lágrima esconde um arco-íris, mas só quando o sol brilha sobre a gota cristalina é que o esplendor se torna visível.

Trechos adaptados de The Ministry of Comfort (Hodder & Stoughton, 1901). Publicado no Âncora, em outubro 2013. Tradução Hebe Rondon Flandoli.

The Stories Jesus Told: The Unjust Judge, Luke 18:1–8


by Peter Amsterdam 

The parable of the unjust judge, often called the story of the importunate woman, is a parable about prayer. It’s sometimes referred to as the “twin” of the parable of the friend at midnight, as they have a number of similarities. Traditionally, both have been seen as primarily teaching persistence in prayer. The parable of the unjust judge does speak about prayer, yet when taking a closer look, we see that Jesus was also telling us something about what God is like when it comes to His hearing and answering our prayers. Let’s start by reading the parable, which we find in Luke, chapter 18.

And he told them a parable to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart. He said, “In a certain city there was a judge who neither feared God nor respected man. And there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him and saying, ‘Give me justice against my adversary.’ For a while he refused, but afterward he said to himself, ‘Though I neither fear God nor respect man, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will give her justice, so that she will not beat me down by her continual coming.’” And the Lord said, “Hear what the unrighteous judge says. And will not God give justice to his elect, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long over them? I tell you, he will give justice to them speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?”[1]

Let’s begin by looking at the two characters of the story.

The Judge

The judge in the parable is not an honorable man. Jesus describes him as someone who does not fear God or respect people. Fearing God was linked to wisdom, yet this judge doesn’t fear God. He does not accept God’s authority, nor does he pay much attention to other people’s opinions.[2] As a result, people can’t appeal to him by saying “For God’s sake, judge in my favor,” because he lacks fear of God and he doesn’t care what people think about him. He has no sense of honor. He feels no shame. The appeal of “for the sake of this widow who is in need” has no effect on him.

The Talmud, which contains the writings of rabbinical Judaism and expresses the opinions of the ancient rabbis, speaks of some judges who were willing to pervert justice for a bowl of meat. Some judges were called “robber-judges” because of how they perverted judgment.[3]

Jesus uses the extreme case of the unjust judge, a man who has no moral scruples and lacks shame in the sight of the community, to point out that the widow, one of the most vulnerable of people in Israel, is not likely to get justice before him.

Now let’s look at the widow’s situation.

The Widow

Widows in first-century Palestine and throughout the Old Testament could be extremely vulnerable. They were considered a symbol of the innocent, powerless, and oppressed.[4]Scripture admonishes that widows should not be mistreated, and if they are, it says that God will hear their cry, as He is the protector of widows. Anyone who perverts the justice of a widow is cursed.

You shall not mistreat any widow or fatherless child. If you do mistreat them, and they cry out to me, I will surely hear their cry.[5]

Father of the fatherless and protector of widows is God in his holy habitation.[6]

Cursed be anyone who perverts the justice due to the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow.[7]

Learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause.[8]

A wife who lost her husband in first-century Israel was in a very vulnerable position. She not only lost her natural protector but also her position and status in society. A widow’s vulnerability is expressed by Jesus when He spoke of scribes who devour widows’ houses,[9]which is likely speaking of some manner of financial exploitation.[10]

Since the widow is bringing her case before a single judge instead of a tribunal, it could be that it involves a financial matter, a debt owed to her, a pledge or part of an inheritance being withheld from her.[11] It could be that she has a suit against one of the heirs of her husband’s property, or perhaps she is being evicted from her home, as sometimes happened to widows. Though a widow didn’t inherit her husband’s property, she had the right of continued support from his estate and could live in his home as long as she remained a widow.[12] However, if she remained in her husband’s family, she had an inferior position, almost like a servant. If she went back to her family, the money given to her father at her wedding had to be returned to her husband’s family.[13]

As women at this time often married at the age of 13 or 14, the widow in the story may have been a fairly young woman. That she went to a judge indicates that she probably had no son or brother or other man in her extended family to speak for her, as if she had male relatives, they would have probably gone before the judge instead of her.

In the context of the story it’s understood that the widow is in the right. She’s seeking what is rightfully hers. The disciples to whom this parable was originally told would have understood that the woman was defenseless and helpless, with no one to stand up for her or defend her. She didn’t have money to offer a bribe. Her perseverance was her only defense.

They would have also recognized that the woman was acting out of character. As a widow, she would have been expected to act like a helpless victim. She instead assumes the responsibility for her own well-being. She steps into a man’s world before the judge, and when rebuffed, she persists.[14]

The Parable

The parable begins with Luke, the Gospel writer, noting what the parable is about.

And [Jesus] told them a parable to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart.[15]

As we will see later, this initial phrase, followed by the whole parable, was told to Jesus’ disciples within the context of the Parousia, which is the theological word for the second coming of Jesus.

He said, “In a certain city there was a judge who neither feared God nor respected man. And there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him and saying, ‘Give me justice against my adversary.'”[16]

We have the unprotected yet bold widow coming before the unjust judge. She’s asking him to take up her case, to bring her justice against her adversary. It’s obviously not the first time she’s come before him. She has repeatedly returned, and for some time he has rebuffed her, refusing to help her.

“For a while he refused, but afterward he said to himself, ‘Though I neither fear God nor respect man, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will give her justice, so that she will not beat me down by her continual coming.’”[17]

Eventually it becomes clear to the judge that the widow is not going to stop pleading for justice. She won’t give up, which causes him to become annoyed and irritated. He admits that he doesn’t care what God or man thinks, but he does care that he’s being constantly bothered by her. He decides to give her justice not because of any goodness or compassion on his part, or even because it’s the right thing to do. His decision stems from being sick and tired of the widow bothering him. He is concerned that he will be beaten down or worn out by her never-ending pleas.

The word translated as “beaten down,” or in other translations as “wear me out” or “weary me,” comes from a Greek word that literally means to “beat black and blue,” especially on the face below the eye; in other words, to give a black eye. Some commentators say that the judge was afraid that the widow would physically attack him out of frustration. Most commentators feel it was meant metaphorically, that she would completely wear him out with her continual coming to seek justice.

Though it’s not specifically stated—and we must remember that parables by nature give very few specifics, with the listener expected to fill in the gaps—it’s possible that the judge was waiting to receive a bribe. Perhaps he had already received a bribe from the woman’s adversary, and because of that he kept putting the woman off. But because of her out-of-character persistence and unceasing demands for justice, he decides to rule in her favor. Simply put, she’s wearing him out with her “continual coming.” The Greek phrase used forcontinual implies going on forever. One author calls it a war of attrition,[18] a gradual wearing away of the judge’s resistance by her continual pleading. The judge concludes that the woman will never give up, so he relents.[19]

One Western author, writing in the 1890s, described an experience he had in Iraq that might help us visualize what Jesus was speaking about in this parable.

It was in the ancient city of Nisibis, in Mesopotamia. Immediately on entering the gate of the city on one side stood the prison, with its barred windows, through which the prisoners thrust their arms and begged for alms. Opposite was a large open hall, the court of justice of the place. On a slightly raised dais at the further end sat the Kadi, or judge, half buried in cushions. Round him squatted various secretaries and other notables. The populace crowded into the rest of the hall, a dozen voices clamoring at once, each claiming that his cause should be the first heard. The more prudent litigants joined not in the fray, but held whispered communications with the secretaries, passing bribes, euphemistically called fees, into the hands of one or another. When the greed of the underlings was satisfied, one of them would whisper to the Kadi, who would promptly call such and such a case. It seemed to be ordinarily taken for granted that judgment would go … for the litigant who had bribed highest. But meantime, a poor woman on the skirts of the crowd perpetually interrupted the proceedings with loud cries for justice. She was sternly bidden to be silent, and reproachfully told that she came there every day. “And so I will,” she cried out, “till the Kadi hears me.” At length, at the end of a suit, the judge impatiently demanded, “What does that woman want?” Her story was soon told. Her only son had been taken for a soldier, and she was alone, and could not till her piece of ground; yet the tax-gatherer had forced her to pay the impost, from which as a lone widow she could be exempt. The judge asked a few questions, and said, “Let her be exempt.” Thus her perseverance was rewarded. Had she had money to fee a clerk, she might have been excused long before.[20]

This account, with its similarities, gives us more of a feel for what the plight of the widow in this parable might have been.

Jesus then gets to the meat of the matter, the point He is trying to get across:

And the Lord said, “Hear what the unrighteous judge says. And will not God give justice to his elect, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long over them?”[21]

Jesus draws attention to what the judge says, and then makes His point. When we pray, our prayers aren’t heard by an unjust judge who cares for no one, who only responds to the woman’s persistent asking for his own selfish reasons. Instead, we bring our petitions to our Father, who loves us and answers the pleas of those who come to Him in prayer.

This parable speaks of the need to pray and to not lose heart if our prayers aren’t answered immediately. Perseverance in prayer is one point of the parable; however, there is more to it.

Luke places this parable right after a discourse from Jesus about the return of the Son of Man.

And he said to the disciples, “The days are coming when you will desire to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and you will not see it.”[22]

Jesus tells His disciples that the time will come when they will long to see the day of His return, but they won’t see it. He then gives an explanation of what it will be like prior to His coming, that it will be like the days before the Flood, and the days of Lot, before judgment came upon the people. There was eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, until suddenly the judgment came. The believers will desire to see the Son of Man, but instead life continues on. But when that day comes, judgment will be swift.[23]

Then Luke begins the story of the judge and the widow, which we read earlier, starting with verse one:

And [Jesus] told them a parable to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart.

The context of the parable is the unfulfilled hope of the coming of the Son of Man. The point is that believers should not lose heart as they wait for the fulfillment of God’s promises, but that as we wait, we should continue to pray in faith, knowing that God will not fail to answer. As Jesus said:

And will not God give justice to his elect, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long over them?[24]

In the context of the return of the Son of Man, God will bring justice to His people at the time of His choosing. The Greek word translated as justice is translated in other places in the New Testament as avenge,[25] vindicate,[26] and bringing punishment to evildoers.[27]Jesus is saying that God will vindicate His people and punish those who do evil. The time of reward for believers and judgment for evildoers will eventually come. And while we wait, our responsibility is to pray and trust, to not give up, get weary, or become exhausted, which are other definitions of the Greek word translated as “to lose heart.”

Jesus goes on to say:

I tell you, he will give justice to them speedily.

God will answer the prayers of His children down through the ages for justice through Jesus’ return. When He comes, justice will be given speedily.

Then Jesus asks a very sobering question:

Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?[28]

That’s a question worth pondering. At Jesus’ return, will He find those of faith, those who have persevered, who trusted and believed? Will Jesus find that we who are Christians have remained faithful to Him?

Jesus told this parable to His disciples prior to His arrival in Jerusalem, not long before He would be arrested, tried, and crucified. His disciples were about to face perilous times. They were being told to pray and to not lose heart.

After Jesus’ resurrection and ascension into heaven, the disciples had the expectation that Jesus would return soon, as did the apostle Paul. In the book of Revelation, the apostle John saw the souls of those who had been slain for the Word of God crying out to God, “How long before you will judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” To which God tells them to rest a little longer.[29]

Christians throughout time have longed to see the return of Jesus, the return of the Son of Man. Jesus is saying that it will happen. God will give justice to His elect, to those who have been crying to Him day and night, and when it comes, the judgment will be swift.

Jesus asked if, when He returns, He will find faith on earth. Through that, we can see that He understands that we are human, that our faith is tested in times of trial. By linking this fact to prayer, He’s making the point that our ability to remain in faith is linked to our faithfulness to pray, to put our trust in God.

While this parable has something to do with the question of God vindicating His people, there are other points about prayer and God’s nature which we can draw from it.

Unlike the judge, who doesn’t respond until he’s sick and tired of hearing from the woman, God does hear our prayers. And He responds, not because we bother Him, but because Heloves us.

We are meant to be persistent in our prayer lives. That means being tenacious, determined to pray, praying regularly, and continuing to pray in faith even if we don’t receive the answer quickly. Just as the woman came boldly before the judge, we are to come boldly before the Lord in prayer.

As we are told in the parable of the friend at midnight:

And I tell you, ask, and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened.[30]

The asking, seeking, and knocking in these verses can be seen as meaning that they go ondoing these things.[31] The petitioners are faithful to bring their requests before God on a regular basis.

At the same time, Jesus cautioned His disciples to not be like Gentiles who “heap up empty phrases” and “think that they will be heard for their many words,”[32] or like the scribes who “for a pretense make long prayers.”[33] Jesus is not seeking lengthy prayers or repetitious prayers. What is important is that our prayers are heartfelt communication with our Father who loves us.

The idea of persistence in prayer isn’t that we are to try to wear God out with our asking over and over. We are to bring our requests before Him with faith and trust, knowing that He loves us like a father loves his child, and will give us what we ask for when it is good for us and within His will to do so. That being said, it should be understood that being persistent in prayer will not always result in God answering the way that we are asking.

We shouldn’t lose faith if our prayers aren’t answered immediately. We’re told to not lose heart. Jesus instructs us to carry on in faith and confidence, knowing that God is a fair and generous judge, a loving father, who will answer according to His will and in His time.

The parables about prayer—the Pharisee and the tax collector, the friend at midnight, the Father’s good gifts, and the unjust judge—all teach us different aspects of prayer. In brief, these are:
We are to pray from our hearts in humility.
We can come before God and boldly ask for our needs.
We should be persistent in our prayers by regularly bringing our petitions before Him.
We can expect God, our heavenly Father, to give us our needs and the things that are good for us.

And perhaps most important of all to remember, God loves each of us as His children. He cares for us. He has our best interests at heart. We can and should come to Him in prayer with faith, trust, humility, and love for the one who loves us with His everlasting love.

Notes

Unless otherwise indicated, all scriptures are from the Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

[1] Luke 18:1–8.


[2] Kenneth E. Bailey, Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2008), 263.


[3] Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, Complete and Unabridged in One Volume (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1993), 674.


[4] Kenneth E. Bailey, Poet & Peasant, and Through Peasant Eyes, combined edition (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1985), 133.


[5] Exodus 22:22–23.


[6] Psalm 68:5.


[7] Deuteronomy 27:19.


[8] Isaiah 1:17.


[9] Luke 20:47.


[10] David Wenham, The Parables of Jesus (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1989), 186.


[11] Joachim Jeremias, Rediscovering the Parables, (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1966), 122.


[12] Arland J. Hultgren, The Parables of Jesus (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2000), 254.


[13] Klyne Snodgrass, Stories With Intent (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2008), 453.


[14]Joel B. Green, The Gospel of Luke (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1997), 640.


[15] Luke 18:1.


[16] Luke 18:2–3.


[17] Luke 18:4–5.


[18] T.W. Manson, The Sayings of Jesus (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1979), 306.


[19] Snodgrass, Stories With Intent, 458.


[20] H. B. Tristram, Eastern Customs in Bible Lands in Poet & Peasant, and Through Peasant Eyes,combined edition, Kenneth E. Bailey (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1985), 134.


[21] Luke 18:6–7.


[22] Luke 17:22.


[23] “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man. They were eating and drinking and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot—they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all—so will it be on the day when the Son of Man is revealed” (Luke 17:26–30).


[24] Luke 18:7.


[25] Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord” (Romans 12:19).


[26] For observe this very thing, that you sorrowed in a godly manner: What diligence it produced in you, what clearing of yourselves, what indignation, what fear, what vehement desire, what zeal, what vindication! In all things you proved yourselves to be clear in this matter (2 Corinthians 7:11 NKJV).


[27]Or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil… (1 Peter 2:14).


[28] Luke 18:8.


[29] Revelation 6:9–11.


[30] Luke 11:9–10.


[31] Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1992), 624.


[32] Matthew 6:7.


[33] Mark 12:40.

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Banquetes

Marcus Vernier

“O coração bem disposto está sempre em festa.”[1] Este é um versículo interessante, principalmente a primeira parte: “Todos os dias do oprimido são infelizes.” Esse versículo fala de duas condições: estar alegre e afligido. Na vida, às vezes estamos alegres, outras vezes afligidos. “A vida é feita de altos e baixos”, as pessoas dizem. Então, qual o significado desse versículo? Simplesmente afirma o óbvio, que a “vida é feita de altos e baixos”. Pode ser, mas nós sabemos que as Escrituras nunca são banais ou desnecessárias. Eu acho que deve haver alguma lição a ser aprendida nesse versículo, alguma instrução para nós.

Lembro-me na juventude, caminhando penosamente para a escola em Londres, contando nas mãos todos os meus problemas, pesares e revezes, todas as minhas desvantagens. Era o contrário do que procuro fazer hoje, que é contar as minhas bênçãos. Logicamente, naquela época eu não conhecia o Senhor, e aposto que milhares de outras pobres almas perdidas provavelmente faziam o mesmo, até mesmo se desesperando por falta de dedos para contar.

Mas isso mudou depois que recebi Jesus como Salvador. De repente senti esperança, podia ver um melhor amanhã, e qualquer coisa era possível! “Com Deus tudo é possível.”[2] Subitamente passei a ter esperança no coração.

Eu acho que existe uma instrução no versículo sobre um coração alegre. Se formos “alegres”, a vida será um banquete contínuo. Mas se nos desesperançarmos, a vida será um banquete constante. Mas se nos desiludirmos e angustiarmos, vamos nos sentir afligidos. Portanto, podemos optar por ficar alegres. Podemos dar pequenos passos de louvor, optando por pensar positivamente e aproveitar a bondade de Deus que nos é transmitida pela Palavra e as promessas nas Escrituras, por meio dos testemunhos dos Seus filhos ao longo das eras, e também por meio das lembranças do que Ele tem feito em nossas vidas. Isso pode começar uma reação em cadeia na nossa vida, do poder de Deus. Certa vez ouvi alguém dizer: “A sua vontade e a força de Deus geram força de vontade!”

Até mesmo o cristão pode se desviar do caminho da vontade de Deus e acabar em um beco sem saída de tristeza e pesares, por se concentrar nos problemas, circunstâncias e condições. A fé fica mais fraca e a sua luzinha parece em desvantagem em comparação às trevas e à impossibilidade das circunstâncias. Mas ao se esforçar e acreditar, pode extrair força de Deus e ser o que Ele pretende que sejamos.

No meu último aniversário, ganhei entre outras coisas uma linda cadernetinha com a minha foto artisticamente colada na capa. “Uáu!”, eu pensei, “mas para o que isso serve?” Foi algumas semanas atrás, mas ontem o Senhor me mostrou para usar a caderneta como um diário de louvor, ao estilo “ação gratidão”, onde eu poderia escrever breves pensamentos de gratidão. Foi em resposta a algo que Peter Amsterdam escreveu:

Algo que pode fazer para cultivar mais gratidão na sua vida e pensar mais nas suas bênçãos e todas as coisas boas é escrevendo um diário de gratidão. Eu estava pensando nisso um tempo atrás, então decidi começar um diário de gratidão.

De acordo com estudos, escrever as coisas pelas quais está agradecido gera benefícios surpreendentes, como, por exemplo, mais alegria, melhores noites de sono, menos solidão, e menos sintomas de doenças. O que eu amo sobre isso é que me faz lembrar do que Deus fez por mim, das muitas alegrias que tenho na vida, das orações atendidas, das vitórias conquistadas, das coisas que Ele tem feito na vida dos que me são queridos. Faz-me lembrar de que Deus participa da minha vida. E ler a respeito do que Ele tem feito me faz amá-lO e agradecer-Lhe ainda mais.

Escrever um diário de gratidão o ajuda a pensar mais nas coisas boas. Você percebe como cada dia é especial, e como as pequenas coisas são maravilhosas. Ao pararmos para nos lembrar e escrever aquilo pelo que estamos agradecidos, percebemos outras bênçãos, e damos ainda mais valor a todas elas. Estar agradecidos pelas coisas boas gera mais coisas boas.[3]

No primeiro dia eu registrei 13 coisas boas. E quando releio o que escrevi, o poder do louvor se torna quase tangível.

O outro dia eu li um trecho de um livro de A. B. Simpson:

O rei Salomão deixou nos provérbios, suas palavras de sabedoria, uma receita para os corações doentes e tristes, e é um medicamento seguro. “O coração alegre serve de bom remédio.” A alegria restaura e cura. A alegria de espírito traz saúde para os ossos e vitalidade para os nervos quando todo o resto falha e outros sedativos não acalmam. Você está doente? Comece a se regozijar no Senhor, e os seus ossos vicejarão como uma erva; seus semblantes reluzirão de saúde e vigor. Preocupação, temor, desconfiança e nervosismo são um veneno! A alegria é um balsam que cura, e se você se regozijar, Deus lhe dará o poder. Ele ordenou que sejamos alegres e nos regozijemos, e Ele nunca deixa de apoiar Seus filhos e cumprir Seus mandamentos. “Alegrem-se no Senhor”, Ele diz. Isso significa que, por mais triste que nos sintamos, por maior que seja a tentação, por mais doente que estejamos, por mais que soframos, devemos nos regozijar no Senhor, e começar agora mesmo.

A alegria do Senhor é a força do nosso corpo,
A alegria de Jesus é o bálsamo para nossa dor,
Sua vida e abundância, nossa fonte de cura,
Sua alegria, nosso elixir para o corpo e o intelecto.[4]


[1] Provérbios 15:15 NVI.

[2] Mark 10:27.

[3]Tudo Fica Melhor com Gratidão” Peter Amsterdam, 10 de julho, 2013.

[4] A. B. Simpson, "A Merry Heart Doeth Good Like a Medicine," no livro Days of Heaven Upon Earth(Nyack, NY: Christian Alliance Publishing, 1897).

Copyright © Fight for Your Faith